Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 49413

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2024 | Month : March | Volume : 18 | Issue : 3 | Page : VD01 - VD03 Full Version

Successful Resolution of Messianic Delusion following Bi-temporal Modified Electroconvulsive Therapy in a Patient with Treatment-resistant Schizophrenia


Published: March 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/65271.19167
Aakanksha Kharb, Sunny Garg, Priti Singh

1. Senior Resident, Department of Psychiatry, B.P.S. Government Medical College for Women, Khanpur Kalan, Sonipat, Haryana, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, B.P.S. Government Medical College for Women, Khanpur Kalan, Sonipat, Haryana, India. 3. Senior Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Mental Health, Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.

Correspondence Address :
Aakanksha Kharb,
Senior Resident, Department of Psychiatry, B.P.S. Government Medical College for Women, Khanpur Kalan, Sonipat-131305, Haryana, India.
E-mail: aakanksha151kharb@gmail.com

Abstract

Messianic delusion comprises a delusional system centered on the patient’s conviction that he has been selected by God for a special task or mission and has unique abilities to carry it out. The present case report describes a case of Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia (TRS) with Messianic delusion in a 23-year-old unmarried male who presented to the Emergency Department with complaints of muttering to himself, decreased sleep, suspiciousness, socio-occupational dysfunction, aggressive behaviour, and a recent suicide attempt. Key interventions offered during the ward stay included rapid tranquilisation, antipsychotics, and benzodiazepines. The patient completely recovered with the concurrent use of clozapine and Modified Electroconvulsive Therapy (MECT). The patient received 16 sessions of MECT. He achieved both short-term and long-term remission with the therapy, as observed during regular follow-ups in the next six months. The present case emphasises the need for a multidisciplinary approach to the management, early detection, and adequate treatment of this challenging illness.

Keywords

Antipsychotics, Clozapine, Religious delusion

Case Report

A 23-year-old unmarried male, a skilled labourer from a rural nuclear family of lower socio-economic status, without a significant past, personal, or family history of medical and surgical illness, presented with his mother and paternal uncle to the Emergency Department of a tertiary hospital located in Northern India with symptoms of unusual talk, aggressive and abusive behaviour towards family members, along with difficulty in initiation and maintaining sleep for the last one to two days. Upon further exploration, the patient was found to be agitated and non co-operative towards the examiner and had to be chemically restrained with an injection of Haloperidol 5 mg and an injection of Lorazepam 4 mg Intramuscularly (IM). Subsequently, the patient was admitted to the psychiatry ward and was kept in a segregated room under observation for the next 24 hours. Further evaluation from his family members revealed that the patient had a chronic history of psychiatric illness for the past seven years (since his school days), which was insidious in onset and continuous in nature. This was characterised by symptoms of muttering to himself in a low tone, attributing himself as a messenger of God, poor self-care and hygiene, and socio-occupational dysfunction.

The history dates back to 2016, when the family members and teachers started noticing a change in his behaviour. The patient stopped talking and started remaining aloof at home and at school. They also noticed a change in his sleep patterns and observed that he used to sit calmly on his bed at night. Additionally, they noticed a decrease in his appetite, and a deterioration in his self-care, as he would take a bath, brush his teeth, and change his clothes only once every 3-5 days. After 2-3 months, family members started noticing that the patient had begun talking to himself in a low tone, which was not audible or comprehensible to others, along with gesturing in the air. Initially, this behaviour occurred for 1 to 2 hours a day, gradually increasing to the entire day over the subsequent six months. It was also observed that the patient had started laughing out loudly on occasion without any apparent reason. After 8-10 months from the onset of the illness, the patient absconded from his school. About 10-12 days later, the patient, in an unkempt condition with torn clothes, was identified by one of his relatives at a railway station situated around 130-150 kilometres from his home. The patient was then brought back home, and consultation was sought from a general physician, but the patient’s symptoms did not show any improvement in the next month. The patient’s academic performance also declined and he failed, in contrast to his average scholastic performance in the 10th class, eventually leading to his dropping out of school. Family members took him to a faith healer, who later advised them to take the patient to a psychiatrist. After a period of 12 to 14 months of untreated illness, the patient was taken to a nearby tertiary hospital, where the patient revealed 2nd person auditory hallucinations during the Mental Status Examination (MSE) (documented). He was then advised to take risperidone 3 mg in divided doses along with benzodiazepines.

On subsequent follow-ups, risperidone was increased to 8 mg in divided doses. He was on regular outpatient follow-up with a private psychiatrist, and his medications were supervised at home by his mother for the next 4-5 years. Gradually, within a period of 8-10 months, his psychotic symptoms decreased, and the patient started interacting with family members, but only with persuasion. The patient did not attain remission, as he remained engaged in non productive activities at home, and a few times he would roam in the village without any purpose. Subsequently, the patient discontinued the medication and stopped attending follow-up appointments. However, his previous symptoms (muttering to himself and suspiciousness) worsened over the next six months. During this period, the patient began to refer to himself as a gatekeeper of God on a special mission and started suspecting his family members of being involved in a conspiracy to prevent him from completing his mission. Within a few days, the patient left his home. After being missing for five months, or just five days before the day of admission, his family members received a call from the urban police station of a district distant from his hometown (approximately 100 km), informing them that the patient was found wandering in a disheaveled condition near their premises. He was then referred to a tertiary Government hospital where he provided his name, address, and his mother’s phone number. His family members reached the hospital and left against medical advice the next day. On the same day, at the railway station, he attempted to jump in front of a moving train. Upon being stopped, the patient became aggressive and attempted to strangle his mother. He also began to verbally abuse other people present. When questioned about his self-injurious act, he stated that his mission on earth as “Gatekeeper” was over, and in order to unite with God, he had to end his human life, as he had already been assigned his next mission in the universe. Despite repeated explanations by his family members, the patient remained unconvinced that these thoughts were implausible and that he was not a messenger of God. Subsequently, the patient was manually restrained by family members and brought to the Emergency Department of a Tertiary Hospital in eastern Haryana, where he was admitted.

On the 3rd day of admission, the patient was shifted to the general psychiatry ward from the segregated room as he was found to be co-operative. General physical and systemic examinations, along with a neurological examination, were found to be normal. There was no history of seizures, head trauma, forgetfulness, weakness of limbs, or substance abuse in the patient. The patient did not report any other psychiatric history. Further exploration revealed that the birth and developmental history were normal. During the MSE, the patient was observed to be ill-kempt, had poor eye-to-eye contact, and exhibited hallucinatory behaviour. His speech was spontaneous, with an increased rate, tone, and volume. His mood was found to be elated. The poverty of content of speech, use of neologisms (such as “gatekeeper”), and 2nd person auditory hallucinations were other notable findings. A score of 66 was found on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) (1). Based on the history and clinical assessments, a diagnosis of “Paranoid Schizophrenia” was considered, and the patient underwent routine investigations (complete blood count, blood sugar, liver function tests, kidney function tests, thyroid profile, lipid profile, viral markers, and chest X-ray), which were all found to be normal. On the 5th day of admission, the patient was started on Tab Olanzapine 5 mg and clonazepam 1.5 mg in divided doses.

On the 15th day of admission, the patient began to elaborate on the voices he was hearing. At times, when asked, he would say that he was talking to God and addressed himself as God’s gatekeeper. When questioned about the term “gatekeeper,” he would elaborate, stating that he was a messenger of God and had been sent to Earth for a special mission for mankind, similar to other messengers sent previously, namely Lord Rama and Lord Krishna. He also elaborated that he was able to hear the voices of Lord Vishnu in clear consciousness, and these voices had informed him about his mission. As there was not much improvement in the symptomatology, the doses were further increased to 20 mg (Olanzapine) over the next 20 days. In subsequent MSEs over the next four weeks, the patient also revealed delusions of grandiosity, religious delusions, delusions of a special mission, and delusions of persecution. Higher mental functions revealed that the patient had concrete thinking, poor judgement, and insight. As his BPRS score only reduced to 54 in the next four weeks on the tablet olanzapine, the option of treatment with the tablet Clozapine was discussed with the family members. Written informed consent was obtained from the family members.

On the 35th day of admission, after baseline recording of weight, body mass index, and a complete blood count, the patient was started on tablet clozapine up to 25 mg in divided doses. On the 45th day of admission, the patient attempted to jump from the second floor of the ward. When questioned about his behaviour, the patient replied that doctors, hospital staff, and family members were impeding his mission accomplishment and that the voices of God had instructed him to jump from the window. Consequently, the patient was prepared for Modified Electric Convulsive Therapy (MECT) along with an increase in the dose of clozapine. During the course in the ward, the patient received 16 sessions of MECT over the next five weeks, along with an increment of tablet clozapine up to 250 mg per day. The patient started showing improvement, and his BPRS score decreased to 18. After 82 days of hospitalisation, the patient was discharged in good condition with residual deficits in social interaction. On subsequent follow-ups for the next six months, there was no re-emergence of delusions and hallucinations, and no notable side-effects of clozapine were noticed with regular monitoring of complete blood count. At his latest follow-up, around six months after his discharge, the patient had started sharing household responsibilities and had begun working as a skilled labourer.

Discussion

Spirituality is an aspect of an individual’s subjective experience. It is still difficult for mental health professionals to discern between healthy religious experiences and pathological ones in modern times. Additionally, religious themes are frequently present in mental disorders. Patients suffering from schizophrenia often present with religious content, which includes both religious delusions and hallucinations (2). In a study conducted on 262 patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders, it was found that around 101 (39%) patients had religious delusions. The study also reported that there were 3.6 times higher odds of the risk of religious delusions in patients with strong religious activities (3).

Religious delusions have been further categorised into messiah syndrome (grandiose identity delusions), persecutory delusions (by demons, devils), delusions of sin, somatic passivity, and antichrist delusions (hetero-destructive behaviour) (2). The core of a messianic delusional condition is the patient’s belief that they have been crafted by God for a unique and immutable mission. For completing this task, the patient believes that they possess multiple unique abilities and proclaims the resurrection and is also a saviour (4). Religious delusions are commonly seen in patients with schizophrenia, but there are only a few reports on messianic delusions.

Although religious practices are cited as an important coping strategy for many people living with schizophrenia, and frequent use of religious coping or higher levels of religiosity among these patients have been linked to a better quality of life (5), it has been reported in the literature that religious delusions have been associated with higher severity of illness, longer duration of untreated illness, higher medication dosages, treatment resistance, and poor outcomes, which is in consonance with the present case report as well (2),(6),(7). In addition to this, it was reported that patients with delusions of religious content hold their delusions with greater conviction as compared to other patients without religious delusions (2),(8). Hence, people with religious delusions are a difficult group to treat, as evidenced in the present case.

Apart from this, it was also observed that patients with religious delusions preferred magicoreligious healing. A study conducted in Taiwan on 55 schizophrenia patients found that these patients had a greater preference for magico-religious healing as compared to psychiatric treatment (6). Another study conducted in India on 40 patients with schizophrenia found that most of the patients (n=23) had undergone magico-religious treatment (9). These types of non psychiatric treatment can affect thoughts and beliefs about health and psychiatric illness, and as a result, there might be poor adherence to psychiatric treatment, which might result in the colouring of the psychopathology of the patient and have increased the duration of untreated illness. It can be speculated that these above mentioned plausible reasons might have influenced the psychopathology (higher conviction of religious delusions) and treatment-related behaviour (delay in seeking treatment, and poor adherence) of the index patient.

A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 studies found the rate of TRS to be around 24.2% in first-episode schizophrenia patients, with men having 1.57 times higher chances than women of developing TRS (10). In line with the present case, it has been found in the literature that religious delusions in schizophrenia are associated with treatment resistance, as in the present case, which failed to show improvement with recommended adequate trials of antipsychotics (11). Evidence also suggests that a subgroup of patients with religious delusions have a higher likelihood of violence and self-injurious behaviour, which was also observed in the present case in the form of higher suicidality (12),(13). Additionally, it has been reported in the past that the lifetime risk of suicide in schizophrenia patients is 5% (14). The literature also confirms that suicidality in schizophrenia has been associated with socio-demographic risk factors such as young age, male gender, and illness-associated risk factors like active hallucinations and delusions, which were also found in the present case (15).

The index case of TRS with high suicidality indicated that the patient needed aggressive management; hence, the patient was started on the tablet clozapine and MECT concurrently. Clozapine has been approved for use in TRS, and it has been observed that around 60-70% of patients with TRS responded to clozapine (16). Previous reports have indicated that the combination therapy of clozapine and MECT is highly effective for positive symptoms among these patients (17). In accordance with the present case, a study conducted by Tor PC et al., to assess the effect of Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) on suicidality in schizophrenia patients revealed that around 86.45% of the patients showed improvement in expressed suicidality after an average of 10.2 sessions of ECT (18). Additionally, a recent review of 40 reports by Grover S et al., found that clozapine with concurrent use of MECT or MECT augmentation in clozapine-resistant patients was effective for both short-term (37.5% to 100% of patients) and sustained long-term improvement, and overall this combination was found to be safe (19). The supremacy of clozapine against other antipsychotics when combined with MECT was also reported (20). Similarly, in the present treatment-resistant case with high BPRS scores and high suicidality, the patient was administered ECT and Clozapine concurrently and attained partial remission without side-effects, as described previously in the literature. In line with a previous study, the present case also maintains partial remission for the long-term on this combination and was found to be a good and safe (20).

Conclusion

The present case report was intended to increase clinician awareness about Messianic delusion and highlight the hurdles in treating a patient with TRS and suicidality. The treating team should adequately address religious and cultural factors associated with religious delusions and hallucinations. It also highlights the timely intervention of MECT to prevent suicide among these patients and the role of combination therapy of clozapine along with MECT to attain remission in a patient with TRS.

Declaration of patient consent: The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given his consent for clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that his name and initial will not be published, and due efforts will be made to conceal the identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

References

1.
Andersen J, Larsen JK, Schultz V, Nielsen BM, Kørner A, Behnke K, et al. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Dimension of schizophrenia--reliability and construct validity. Psychopathology. 1989;22(02-03):168-76. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Sofou N, Giannakopoulos O, Arampatzi E, Konstantakopoulos G. Religious delusions: Definition, diagnosis, and clinical implications. Psychiatriki. 2021;32(3):224-31. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Anderson-Schmidt H, Gade K, Malzahn D, Papiol S, Budde M, Heilbronner U, et al. The influence of religious activity and polygenic schizophrenia risk on religious delusions in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2019;210:255-61. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Perez L. The messianic idea and messianic delusion. Ment Health Soc. 1978;5(5- 6):266-74.
5.
Triveni D, Grover S, Chakrabarti S. Religiosity among patients with schizophrenia: An exploratory study. Indian J Psychiatry. 2017;59(4):420-28.
6.
Getz GE, Fleck DE, Strakowski SM. Frequency and severity of religious delusions in Christian patients with psychosis. Psychiatry Res. 2001;103(1):87-91. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Huang CL, Shang CY, Shieh MS, Lin HN, Su JC. The interactions between religion, religiosity, religious delusion/hallucination, and treatment-seeking behaviour among schizophrenic patients in Taiwan. Psychiatry Res. 2011;187(3):347-53. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Appelbaum PS, Robbins PC, Roth LH. Dimensional approach to delusions: Comparison across types and diagnoses. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156(12):1938-43. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Kulhara P, Avasthi A, Sharma A. Magico-religious beliefs in schizophrenia: A study from north India. Psychopathol. 2000;33(2):62-68. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Siskind D, Orr S, Sinha S, Yu O, Brijball B, Warren N, et al. Rates of treatment- resistant schizophrenia from first-episode cohorts: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2022;220(3):115-20. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Rosenbaum DMS, Robertson D, Law S. Psychiatric futility and palliative care for a patient with Clozapine-resistant Schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Pract. 2022;28(4):344-48. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Clark RA. Self-mutilation accompanying religious delusions: A case report and review. J Clin Psychiatry. 1981;42(6):243-45.
13.
Large M, Babidge N, Andrews D, Storey P, Nielssen O. Major self-mutilation in the first episode of psychosis. Schizophr Bull. 2009;35(5):1012-21. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Sadock B, Sadock V, Ruiz P. In: Kaplan & Sadock’s Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry. 10th ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2017: Pp. 1406-25.
15.
Hor K, Taylor M. Suicide and schizophrenia: A systematic review of rates and risk factors. J Psychopharmacol. 2010;24(Suppl 4):81-90. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Pandey A, Kalita K. Treatment-resistant schizophrenia: How far have we traveled? Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:e994425. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Havaki-Kontaxaki BJ, Ferentinos PP, Kontaxakis VP, Paplos KG, Soldatos CR. Concurrent administration of clozapine and electroconvulsive therapy in clozapine-resistant schizophrenia. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2006;29(1):52-56. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Tor PC, Bin Abdin E, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, Loo C. Relief of expressed suicidality in schizophrenia after electroconvulsive therapy: A naturalistic cohort study. Psychiatry Res. 2020;284:e112759. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Grover S, Hazari N, Kate N. Combined use of clozapine and ECT: A review. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2015;27(3):131-42. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Ahmed S, Khan AM, Mekala HM, Venigalla H, Ahmed R, Etman A, et al. Combined use of electroconvulsive therapy and antipsychotics (both clozapine and non-clozapine) in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: A comparative meta-analysis. Heliyon. 2017;3(11):e00429.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/65271.19167

Date of Submission: May 06, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Aug 05, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Sep 05, 2023
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 12, 2023
• Manual Googling: Aug 23, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Sep 02, 2023 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 5

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com