Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 38232

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : March | Volume : 18 | Issue : 3 | Page : SC09 - SC12 Full Version

The Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation as Adjuvant to Phototherapy versus Phototherapy Alone on Neonatal Jaundice: A Randomised Controlled Trial


Published: March 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/64646.19181
Ghanshyam Das, Abhinay Jain, Vijay Gupta, Durgesh Shukla

1. Professor, Department of Paediatrics, G.R. Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India. 2. Senior Resident, Department of Paediatrics, G.R. Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Neonatology, G.R. Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India. 4. Demonstrator Cum Statistician, Department of Community Medicine, G.R. Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Ghanshyam Das,
Professor, Department of Paediatrics, G.R. Medical College, Veer Savarkar Marg, Gwalior-474009, Madhya Pradesh, India.
E-mail: drghshyamh@rediffmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Neonatal jaundice, or neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia, is a common and significant concern among newborns globally. Given that phototherapy is the primary treatment for neonatal jaundice, exploring alternative adjunctive treatments is beneficial.

Aim: To observe the impact of vitamin D supplementation as an adjuvant therapy alongside phototherapy in managing neonatal jaundice.

Materials and Methods: A hospital-based double-blinded randomised controlled trial was conducted at the Special Newborn Care Unit (SNCU) in Department of Paediatrics, G.R. Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, a tertiary care neonatal centre in North India, over a two-year period (April 2020 to March 2022). The study included 70 newborns with neonatal jaundice, divided into two groups: one receiving phototherapy and vitamin D (Group 1), and the other receiving phototherapy alone (Group 2). The average levels of bilirubin were compared at baseline, 48 hours, 96 hours, and 120 hours in the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 22.0, calculating frequency, percentage, mean, Standard Deviation (SD), and applying the independent t-test for comparison. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The mean total serum bilirubin at admission in Group 1 was 18.58±1.76 mg/dL, and in Group 2 was 17.77±2.01 mg/dL, with a p-value of 0.077. At 48 hours, the levels in Group 1 were 15.11±1.99 mg/dL, and in Group 2 were 14.69±1.53 mg/dL, with a p-value of 0.339. At 96 hours, the levels in Group 1 were 14.75±5.62 mg/dL, and in Group 2 were 13.16±1.49 mg/dL, with a p-value of 0.237. At 120 hours, the levels in Group 1 were 8.90±4.66 mg/dL, and no patients were observed in Group 2. The study found that vitamin D as an adjuvant to phototherapy did not significantly impact the rate of decline of serum bilirubin, and the duration of phototherapy was not affected significantly.

Conclusion: The study concludes that vitamin D, as an adjuvant to phototherapy, does not significantly affect the rate of decline of serum bilirubin, and it does not alter the duration of phototherapy when comparing both groups.

Keywords

Full-term, Hyperbilirubinaemia, Neonates

Neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia is a prevalent condition worldwide and is considered one of the most critical issues in neonates, particularly when levels of indirect bilirubin increase to a point where they could cross the blood-brain barrier, leading to bilirubin encephalopathy or kernicterus if not promptly treated (1). Pathological jaundice can be influenced by various factors such as gestational age, birth weight, premature rupture of membranes, maternal infection, and other conditions during pregnancy (2). Vitamin D activation occurs through 25-hydroxylation in hepatocytes followed by 1-hydroxylation in the kidneys. Despite vitamin D being synthesised in the liver, it also plays a role in metabolising indirect bilirubin to direct bilirubin. The metabolisms of vitamin D and bilirubin occur in two distinct pathways, but they may influence each other during the biosynthesis stage in the liver (3).

Although, the present study was conducted at a tertiary care centre, the results can provide valuable insights for primary healthcare physicians regarding the role of vitamin D in treating neonatal jaundice. Exploring any treatment modality that could reduce the need for phototherapy, shorten hospital stays, and decrease serum bilirubin levels is essential. Thus, the present study was designed to assess the additional role of vitamin D alongside phototherapy for the treatment of neonatal jaundice. The objective of the study was to evaluate the role of vitamin D supplementation as adjuvant therapy with phototherapy in managing neonatal jaundice.

The present study was conducted with the null hypothesis that vitamin D supplementation as adjuvant therapy with phototherapy has no effect on the management of neonatal jaundice. As an alternative hypothesis, it was hypothesised that vitamin D supplementation as adjuvant therapy with phototherapy is more effective in managing neonatal jaundice.

Material and Methods

This hospital-based double-blinded randomised controlled trial was conducted at the SNCU Department of Paediatrics, G.R. Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India, over a two-year period (April 2020 to March 2022), following ethical clearance from the institutional ethical committee (IEC number: 488/IEC-GRMC/2019).

Sample size calculation: The study involved a total of 70 newborns, with the sample size calculated using the formula (4):

at a 5% level of significance and 80% power of the test, assuming a 1.8 effect size with a standard deviation of 2.6 in the vitamin D group and a standard deviation of 2.7 in the control group based on the pilot study.

The obtained sample size was 34 in each group, approximated to 35 in each group, i.e., Group 1 (allocated to intervention-received phototherapy and vitamin D) and Group 2 (allocated to intervention-received phototherapy and placebo). The total number of children included in the present study was 70, selected using purposive sampling technique.

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: Full-term neonates (>37 weeks) admitted to SNCU with neonatal jaundice and total serum bilirubin levels ranging from 14-20 mg/dL were included in the study. Exclusion criteria comprised preterm neonates, conjugated hyperbilirubinaemia, sepsis, neonatal asphyxia, respiratory distress, major congenital anomalies, liver or kidney disease in the neonates or their mothers, bilirubin encephalopathy, hyperbilirubinaemia requiring exchange transfusion, and subjects residing more than 10 km from the hospital, those newborns who received vitamin D supplementation prior to admission, and newborns with haemolytic disorders.

Study Procedure

After inclusion, the study subjects were randomised into two groups using a simple randomisation method. The intervention group received vitamin D and phototherapy, while the comparative group received phototherapy and a placebo. Randomisation was performed by the principal investigator using computer-generated opaque sealed envelopes with random numbers. The intervention was administered using opaque vials of vitamin D and placebo prepared by a third person, with only the statistician aware of the coding (Table/Fig 1).

Informed written consent was obtained from the parents of the neonates. Venous blood samples were collected from each neonate for bilirubin estimation using standard aseptic precautions. The bilirubin estimation was conducted in the Biochemistry Department of GR Medical College, Gwalior (MP) using a BA 400, fully automated Biosystem company machine based on the principle of photometry.

Phototherapy was administered using the Seefar Nice 4000 Spot Light-emitting Diode (LED) phototherapy machine, a microprocessor-controlled system with 24 Hi Bright Blue LED lamps and 3 white LED lamps. The irradiance level was maintained at 30 micro watt/cm2/nm at a distance as close as possible. During the phototherapy process, there was no exposure of infrared rays and ultraviolet rays to the neonates. Infants under phototherapy lights were kept naked except for eye patches and genital covering, and they were turned every two hours. The infant’s temperature was monitored at six-hour intervals.

Baseline parameters such as body weight, head circumference, and gestational age were recorded after enrollment. Newborns received phototherapy as per the standard unit protocol, along with vitamin D3 drops (400 IU) once daily orally in the intervention group, while the comparative group received phototherapy and a placebo. Treatment, investigations, and basic care were consistent across both groups. Newborns were evaluated with baseline serum bilirubin and compared for both groups at baseline, 48 hours, 96 hours, and 120 hours.

In both groups, phototherapy was discontinued once the serum bilirubin level declined to <14 mg. After discharge, vitamin D was continued for both groups as per the unit policy.

Statistical Analysis

Data were entered in Microsoft excel software and analysis were performed on SPSS 22.0 version. For comparison of two groups, independent t-test was applied. The p-value was calculated and statistical significance was set at 5% level.

Results

The study included a total of 70 newborns, with 35 newborns in each group. The mean age in Group 1 was 3.89±1.41 days, while the mean age in Group 2 was 3.89±1.13 days (p=1.00), indicating that the mean age of newborns was matched in both groups. The mean birth weight in Group 1 was 2.62±0.39 kg, and in Group 2, it was 2.41±0.28 kg, with a statistically significant p-value (p<0.015). The mean gestational age in Group 1 was 38.11±1.28 weeks, and in Group 2, it was 37.63±0.84 weeks (p<0.06). The mean head circumference in Group 1 was 33.71±1.65 cm, and in Group 2, it was 32.93±1.47 cm, with a p-value of 0.04. The mean haemoglobin of Group 1 was 14.47±1.44 g/dL, and in Group 2, it was 15.05±1.54 g/dL, with a p-value of 0.11. The mean reticulocyte count of Group 1 was 4.86±0.8%, and in Group 2, it was 4.91±1.12%, with a p-value of 0.83 (Table/Fig 2).

The mean total serum bilirubin at admission in Group 1 was 18.58±1.76 mg/dL, and in Group 2, it was 17.77±2.01 mg/dL, with a p-value of 0.077. At 48 hours, the mean total serum bilirubin in Group 1 was 15.11±1.99 mg/dL, and in Group 2, it was 14.69±1.53 mg/dL, with a p-value of 0.339. At 96 hours, the mean total serum bilirubin in Group 1 was 14.75±5.62 mg/dL, and in Group 2, it was 13.16±1.49 mg/dL, with a p-value of 0.223. At 120 hours, the mean total serum bilirubin in Group 1 was 8.90±4.66 mg/dL, and all Group 2 patients were discharged within three days (Table/Fig 3).

The mean duration of phototherapy in Group 1 was 3.74±0.56 days, and in Group 2, it was 3.54±0.50 days (p-value=0.122), which was not statistically significant (Table/Fig 4).

Discussion

Adding vitamin D to a pregnant women’s diets is associated with a decrease in neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia (5),(6). Thus, the present study was framed to assess the additional role of vitamin D supplementation for the treatment of neonatal jaundice. The present study reported that there was no significant difference in Group 1 (phototherapy with adjuvant vitamin D) and Group 2 (phototherapy and placebo) in treatment of neonatal jaundice. Duration of phototherapy was found to be same in both the groups. Also, the baseline parameters of birth weight and head circumference showed significant difference; though these parameters may not overall affect the outcome.

Similar to current study results, the study conducted by Mehrpisheh S reported that the mean serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were 10.76±8.6 ng/dL in the case group and 14.88±11.38 ng/dL in the control group. There were no significant differences between the two groups (p=0.11) (7). Bhat JA et al., conducted a study on 100 newborns, who were divided into two groups (50 in each group) on the basis of their serum bilirubin level on the 5th day of life (8). Newborns having serum bilirubin levels in the physiological range were included in the control group, and newborns having serum bilirubin levels out of the physiological range and who needed treatment were included in the case group. It was observed that the mean vitamin D level of newborn was in the normal range in controls but significantly decrease in cases and the difference were statistically significant.

Mutlu M et al., suggested that low level of serum vitamin D may be associated with hyperbilirubinaemia in full term neonates and noted a significant negative correlation between serum vitamin D and serum parathyroid hormone level among neonates (9). Similarly another trial conducted by Abed NT et al., found that decreased levels of vitamin D significantly correlated with neonatal indirect hyperbilirubinaemia, therefore low vitamin D can be considered as risk factor for neonatal jaundice (10). Another study done by Elfarangy MS et al., found that low serum levels of vitamins C, D and E were present in neonatal jaundice group indicating that neonatal jaundice is accompanied by decrease in the serum levels of these vitamins attracting the attention of researchers to study the effect of the vitamin supplementation as an adjuvant therapy in neonatal jaundice (3).

Huang J et al., also found that vitamin D levels were lower in neonates with hyperbilirubinaemia as compared to term neonates without hyperbilirubinaemia (5). So this can possibly suggest that neonates with lower serum vitamin D levels are at higher risk of developing hyperbilirubinaemia. Interestingly, a trial by Shahriarpanah S et al., found that the mean serum vitamin D levels significantly increased after phototherapy (11). They also found that serum calcium and magnesium significantly decrease after phototherapy, so the present study showed that phototherapy could decrease levels of calcium and magnesium and increase the level of vitamin D.

Another trial by Aletayeb SMH et al., compared serum vitamin D levels of healthy term jaundiced and non jaundiced newborns and their mothers. They showed significant differences in the serum vitamin D levels of term jaundiced newborns, despite a non significant difference in the vitamin D levels of their mothers. They found a negative correlation between vitamin D levels and serum Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) and Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) (12). Maternal vitamin D levels have also been found to be associated with neonatal jaundice.

In a previous study conducted by Jaiswal BP et al., it was found that the presence of maternal vitamin D deficiency could effectively predict the increased risk of neonatal jaundice (13). Vitamin D deficiency is common in pregnant women, so vitamin D supplementation can be given for preventing maternal hypovitaminosis D and subsequent neonatal jaundice.

El Rifai NM et al., found that maternal vitamin D levels strongly correlate with neonatal levels (14). They revealed that 68.9% of mothers and 92.4% of their neonates had vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency. They also revealed a strong correlation between neonatal vitamin D and calcium levels.

Rashwan NI et al., found that without vitamin D3 supplementation, neonates with low vitamin D and physiological jaundice who received phototherapy showed considerable improvement in vitamin D levels five days later (15). They found significantly low vitamin D3 levels in full-term neonates with physiological hyperbilirubinaemia; however, whether this is an association or a pathogenic mechanism would require further investigation.

Zahrah MAAI et al., concluded that vitamin D and melatonin could be used as adjuvant treatment in neonatal jaundice in combination with phototherapy, with the superiority of vitamin D over melatonin (16). In the present study, it was found that in Group 1, the mean duration of phototherapy was 3.74±0.56 days and in Group 2 was 3.54±0.50, although this difference was not statistically significant.

Similar to the study results, a prior study conducted by Mehrpisheh S et al., reported that the mean and standard deviation of serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D level were 10.76±8.6 ng/dL in the case group {term infant with Neonatal Indirect Hyperbilirubinemia (NIH)} and 14.88±11.38 ng/dL in the control group (non icteric term infant) (7). Results suggested that there was a lack of relationship between vitamin D level and NIH.

In the study by Gilles DR et al., it was shown that there was no significant increase in plasma 25-hydroxy vitamin D3 after 48 hours of phototherapy. It was concluded that such treatment does not stimulate the biosynthesis of vitamin D (17).

It is known that vitamin D deficiency may increase the occurrence of neonatal jaundice. The present study’s results showed that there is no significant role of vitamin D in neonatal jaundice in terms of the duration of phototherapy and the fall of serum bilirubin, thus accepting the null hypothesis.

Limitation(s)

The present study was conducted at a tertiary care centre and has limitations for generalisability. The mothers of the infants were not assessed for the vitamin D level, which may affect the outcome of the neonates. A multicentric study on a larger sample needs to be conducted in the future to confirm the present study findings.

Conclusion

In the present study, vitamin D, along with phototherapy in the treatment of neonatal jaundice, did not have any role in the fall of serum bilirubin or the duration of phototherapy. However, previous studies show the association of vitamin D and neonatal jaundice, which may be due to region-specific, race, ethnicity related to vitamin D. Large multicentric trials are needed to confirm the role of vitamin D in the treatment of neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia along with phototherapy.

References

1.
Ullah S, Rahman K, Hedayati M. Hyperbilirubinemia in neonates: Types, causes, clinical examinations, preventive measures and treatments: A narrative review article. Iran J Public Health. 2016;45(5):558-68.
2.
Bahr TM, Christensen RD, Agarwal AM, George TI, Bhutani VK. The Neonatal Acute Bilirubin Encephalopathy Registry (NABER): Background, aims, and protocol. Neonatology. 2019;115(3):242-46. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Elfarargy MS, Ali DA, Al-Ashmawy GM, Mohamed SA. Detection of serum levels of Vitamin C, D, and E in neonatal jaundice. J Clin Neonatol. 2019;8(4):222-26. [crossref]
4.
Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research? Indian J Psychol Med. 2013;35(2):121-26. Doi: 10.4103/ 0253-7176.116232. PMID: 24049221; PMCID: PMC3775042. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Huang J, Zhao Q, Li J, Meng J, Li S, Yan W, et al. Correlation between neonatal hyperbilirubinemia and vitamin D levels: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021;16(5):e0251584. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Jahanjoo F. Maternal and neonatal metabolic outcomes of vitamin D supplementation in gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Nutr Metab. 2018;73(2):145-59. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Mehrpisheh S, Memarian A, Mahyar A, Valiahdi NS. Correlation between serum vitamin D level and neonatal indirect hyperbilirubinemia. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18(1):178. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Bhat JA, Sheikh SA, Ara R. Correlation of 25-hydroxy vitamin D level with neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in term healthy newborn. Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2021;8(1):05-09. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Mutlu M, Çayir A, Çayir Y, Özkan B, Aslan Y. Vitamin D and Hyperbilirubinaemia in Neonates. HK J Paediatr (new series). 2013;18:77-81.
10.
Abed NT, Negm FF, Ahmad ES, Mohammed HA. Vitamin D levels in full-term neonates with indirect hyperbilirubinemia. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2020;81(5):2030-35. [crossref]
11.
Shahriarpanah S, Haji EbrahimTehrani F, Davati A, Ansari I. Effect of phototherapy on serum level of calcium, magnesium and Vitamin D in infants with hyperbilirubinemia. Iran J Pathol. 2018;13(3):357-62.
12.
Aletayeb SMH, Dehdashtiyan M, Aminzadeh M, Malekyan A, Jafrasteh S. Comparison between maternal and neonatal serum vitamin D levels in term jaundiced and non jaundiced cases. J Chin Med Assoc. 2016;79(11):614-17. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Jaiswal BP, Kumar A, Ansari MA, Saran J. To evaluate the effect of maternal vitamin D deficiency on increased risk for hyperbilirubinemia in term newborns: An observational study. Int J Health Clin Res. 2021;4(1):273-77.
14.
El Rifai NM, Moety GAA, Gaafar HM, Hamed DA. Vitamin D deficiency in Egyptian mothers and their neonates and possible related factors. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(10):1064-68. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Rashwan NI, El-Abd Ahmed A, Hassan MH, Bakheet TF, Mohamed AME, Helmi BA. Assessments of serum 25-Hydroxy Cholecalciferol levels in neonates with physiological jaundice candidates for phototherapy. Int J Pediatr. 2021;9(5):13445-54.
16.
Zahrah MAAI, Booran MSN, Rand AAA. Effect of vitamin D and melatonin supplementation as adjuvant in treatment of neonatal jaundice. World J Pharm Life Sci. 2020;6(3):01-05.
17.
Gillies DR, Hay A, Sheltawy MJ, Congdon PJ. Effect of phototherapy on plasma 25(OH)-vitamin D in neonates. Biol Neonate. 1984;45(5):225-27.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/64646.19181

Date of Submission: Apr 11, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jun 06, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Dec 29, 2023
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 13, 2023
• Manual Googling: Dec 25, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Dec 27, 2023 (17%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com