Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 33422

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : February | Volume : 18 | Issue : 2 | Page : TC07 - TC13 Full Version

Imaging Approaches in Dementia: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Cross-sectional Imaging in the Indian Population


Published: February 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/67220.19055
Sanjana Sanzgiri, Mitusha Verma, Ritvik Thakrar, Prishaa Bhurrji, Deepak Patkar

1. Research Intern, Department of Radiology, Nanavati Max Superspeciality Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. 2. Consultant Radiologist, Department of Radiology, Nanavati Max Superspeciality Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. 3. Fellow in Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Nanavati Max Superspeciality Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. 4. Research Intern, Department of Radiology, Nanavati Max Superspeciality Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. 5. Head, Department of Radiology, Nanavati Max Superspeciality Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Sanjana Sanzgiri,
A/12, Udyan Prabha, Tejpal Scheme, Vile Parle East, Mumbai-400057, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: susanzgiri94@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Dementia is a broad medical term that describes the progressive cognitive decline of brain function due to disease or impairment, resulting in interference with daily activities. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is commonly used for the clinical diagnosis of dementia by identifying cerebral atrophy and structural alterations. Furthermore, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) can detect biochemical abnormalities in dementia patients, which may be beneficial for early diagnosis and treatment.

Aim: To provide a comprehensive protocol and a guidance tool for radiologists to effectively diagnose dementia and its subtypes {Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), frontotemporal lobe dementia, etc.} based on radiological findings coupled with volumetry, spectroscopy, and Arterial Spin Labelling (ASL) findings.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Radiology, Nanavati Max Superspeciality Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India, between June 2022 and June 2023. A total of 125 patients were analysed to observe the correlation between whole brain volume, Intracranial Volume (ICV) of different cortical regions, hippocampal atrophy, and MRS findings. Descriptive statistics were used, and results were expressed as means and standard deviations for continuous variables, and as frequencies and percentages for categorical variables.

Results: Out of 125 patients, 71 (56.8%) were males, and 54 (43.2%) were females, with ages ranging from 41 to 96 years. The majority presented with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) 36 patients (28.8%) and Vascular Dementia (VaD) (18 patients - 14.4%). Some clinical features and imaging findings overlapped, resulting in some cases being a combination of different types of dementia. MRI, MRS, and Medial Temporal Atrophy (MTA) played a crucial role in allowing clinicians to perform a differential diagnosis.

Conclusion: The use of MR volumetry and spectroscopy aids in classifying the type of dementia, which, in turn, gives treating clinicians a better perspective for further treatment and its outcomes.

Keywords

Alzheimer’s disease, Arterial spin labelling, Frontotemporal lobe dementia, Magnetic resonance imaging, Magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Dementia is a clinical syndrome characterised by cognitive impairment, often involving difficulties with patients’ thoughts, behaviour, mood, and memory, which worsen over time (1),(2),(3). It primarily affects the older population (>65 years), but approximately 9% of cases occur in younger individuals. According to the latest World Health Organisation (WHO) report, the number of patients suffering from dementia is expected to increase from 55 million to 139 million by 2050 (4),(5). Distinguishing between the characteristics of typical ageing and dementia is crucial for an accurate diagnosis. Individuals experiencing normal ageing maintain independent functioning and may only occasionally report memory problems. In contrast, patients with dementia depend on others for daily tasks and have significantly impaired memory, often unable to recall events when asked. Moreover, patients with dementia may exhibit socially unacceptable behaviours, whereas those aging normally typically retain social skills (5),(6),(7).

Alzheimer’s disease is the most common form of dementia, accounting for about 60-70% of cases worldwide (8). Other less common forms include VaD, Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD), MCI, and Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB). Accurate classification of different dementias remains a challenge for clinicians, as histopathologic examination alone cannot determine the underlying cause, often revealing mixed pathologies in the patient’s brain (1).

Neuroimaging techniques have been widely used for the diagnosis of dementia by ruling out cognitive impairment due to intracranial haemorrhage or space-occupying lesions. These techniques have become reliable for accurately diagnosing distinct types of dementia (9). Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) combined with MRI is beneficial for confirming findings and identifying abnormalities at an early stage (10).

The aim of the present study was to diagnose the different subtypes of dementia using volume analysis, MRS findings, morphologic factors, and ASL results. A differential diagnosis can enable the development of an effective treatment plan, thereby providing symptomatic relief to patients.

Material and Methods

This retrospective observational study included all adult patients (confirmed cases of dementia) between June 2022 and June 2023 at the Department of Radiology, Nanavati Max Superspeciality Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: Data were collected retrospectively from 125 cognitively impaired participants. These individuals underwent imaging based on complaints such as memory loss, forgetfulness, gait disorders (imbalance, visual disturbances, etc.), and clinical/cognitive function assessment tests such as the finger tapping test, Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) total score, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Participants with memory complaints and a diagnosis of schizophrenia were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

Patients were scanned using a GE 3.0 Tesla MRI Scanner, and the protocols used are illustrated in (Table/Fig 1). To analyse the variation in head size, the authors also calculated the total ICV for each participant using Neuroshield, an artificial intelligence-based clinical tool (11),(12). MRI has been used for decades to measure structural changes in the brain associated with dementia. It is an imaging modality that provides detailed anatomical information due to its excellent tissue contrast, spatial resolution, and levels of image resolution (1),(13). These studies assist in evaluation of neurodegenerative diseases by quantifying the volume of brain structures. Brain volume measurements are a known biomarkers for diagnosing different types of dementia (14). This volumetric analysis serves as a valuable clinical diagnostic support tool, aiding clinicians in calculating volumetric changes, tracking the clinical progression of the disease, and monitoring the percentage of ICV (11).

The MRS is a widely available, non invasive technique that measures biochemical changes in brain tissue (15). N-Acetyl-L-Aspartate (NAA) is a neuronal marker found in neurons, neuroglial precursors, and immature oligodendrocytes, while myo-inositol (mI) is a glial marker present in the frontal, parietal, temporal, and temporoparietal lobes (1). A decrease in the NAA/Creatinine (Cr) ratio correlates with the severity of dementia and cognitive decline (16). Klunk WE et al., demonstrated that a decrease in NAA is linked to neuronal loss (17).

MRI studies aid in identifying the type of dementia based on visual rating scales such as the MTA score, Fazekas scale, and Koedam score. The MTA and Koedam scores assist in identifying AD, while the Fazekas scale helps in determining VaD and normal aging (18). The MTA is a visual score performed on coronal T1-weighted MRI images based on hippocampal height and the width of the choroid fissure and temporal horn (19),(20). The Fazekas scale is 8used to quantify the amount of white matter hyperintensities on Fluid-attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) or T2-weighted images (21),(22). (Table/Fig 2) shows the Fazekas score scale. The Koedam score provides a scale for analysing parietal atrophy in sagittal, coronal, and axial planes and has proven to have a positive predictive value in the diagnosis of AD (23).

ACR appropriateness criteria: Imaging findings in structural MRI studies are non specific and have limited potential to differentiate between types of dementia. Advanced imaging techniques like functional neuroimaging with MRI and MRS can provide a better understanding of neurodegenerative disorders. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria (ACR) offers evidence-based guidelines for clinical conditions that are annually reviewed by an interdisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision involve an extensive analysis of existing medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures. In instances where the evidence is not unequivocal, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment (24),(25).

The PET with FDG is most commonly used to identify neurodegenerative processes (10). FDG PET scans serve as an in-vivo clinical assessment of the autoradiographic technique. These scans are utilised to visualise cerebral glucose metabolism, which is instrumental in the differential diagnosis of dementia and the prediction of cognitive decline by analysing neural degeneration. Glucose is the primary metabolic substrate for energy production in the brain. FDG leverages deoxyglucose as a tracer to detect the exchange of glucose between plasma and the brain (26). Given that glucose is the sole source of energy for the brain, the loss of neurons in neurodegenerative brain diseases may result in decreased glucose consumption in specific brain regions (27). It is important to note that molecular imaging, such as FDG PET, was not utilised in the diagnosis of dementia types in our study.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used, and results were expressed as means and standard deviations for continuous variables, and as frequencies and percentages for categorical variables.

Results

(Table/Fig 3) summarises the statistical analysis of the dataset, detailing whole brain volume and hippocampal volume with respect to gender. The majority of patients were aged between 71-80 years, with 52 (41.6%) falling within this age range (Table/Fig 4).

In the present study, from a cohort of 125 patients, only 10 patients (8%) were diagnosed with AD. Brain volumetry performed on AD patients revealed a mild to moderate reduction in whole brain volume (mean=877.78 cc), and a moderate to severe reduction in hippocampal volumes (mean value of right hippocampal volume: 2.38 cc; mean value of left hippocampal volume: 2.21 cc). MRI scans showed white matter changes in these patients. Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) indicated a decrease in the N-acetylaspartate to creatinine (NAA/Cr) ratio and an increase in the myo-inositol to creatinine (mI/Cr) ratio, further supporting an AD pathology. (Table/Fig 5) presents a moderate reduction in the NAA/Cr ratio, indicative of neuronal loss, and an elevation in the mL/Cr ratio in the grey matter as observed in AD (in a 78-year-old female patient). (Table/Fig 6) shows a similar reduction in the NAA/Cr ratio within the white matter of the same patient.

The MCI cases accounted for 29% of the total sample (n=36), with an average age of approximately 67 years. Compared to AD patients, those with MCI exhibited a mild reduction in whole brain volume (mean=926.43 cc±107.26) and hippocampal volumes (mean value of right hippocampal volume=2.78 cc±0.422; mean value of left hippocampal volume=2.61 cc±0.382) with a MTA score ranging from 1 to 2.

The number of infarcts and the Fazekas score contributed to the diagnosis of VaD. A multi-infarct etiology was most common among the patients. In individuals with VaD, white matter NAA/Cr levels were lower when compared to AD patients. FTD cases (n=10) were diagnosed based on cerebral atrophy and the specific morphological features of the atrophy, particularly in the frontal and temporal lobes.

Additionally, Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH) was identified in the present cohort and was diagnosed based on cerebral atrophy, aqueductal or fourth ventricular flow void, the disproportion of ventricular dilatation to the degree of cortical atrophy, and the callosal angle.

(Table/Fig 7) illustrates the total number of patients diagnosed with different subtypes of dementia within the cohort.

While the cases of dementia discussed represent a broad classification, clinical features and imaging findings may sometimes overlap, resulting in various combinations of dementia. The most common mixed type found was AD with FTD, each with an overlay of multi-infarct status (VaD). MRS is a valuable tool in the diagnosis of different dementias. (Table/Fig 8) summarises the diagnostic factors used by clinicians for differential diagnosis. The NAA/Cr ratio in the white and grey matter, as shown in (Table/Fig 9), is frequently employed to classify the various subtypes of dementia. AD patients exhibited an NAA/Cr ratio below 1.4 in the grey matter spectrum, which is a strong indicator of neuronal loss. Alongside an increased mI/Cr ratio, this could potentially assist radiologists in confirming a diagnosis of AD, although further exploration is needed. In contrast, the NAA/Cr ratio in the grey matter of FTD patients was approximately 1.5. However, for diagnosing VaD, the NAA/Cr ratio in the white matter spectrum is considered.

Discussion

Alzheimer’s Disease (AD)

MRI is more sensitive than Computed Tomography (CT) scans to patterns of cortical atrophy and can better exclude other causes of dementia. It plays a crucial role in the diagnosis of AD by assessing volume changes in characteristic locations of the medial temporal lobe (including the hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, and perirhinal cortex) and the temporoparietal cortical region. (Table/Fig 10) shows MRI images of two patients diagnosed with AD. Medial temporal lobe atrophy can be determined directly or indirectly. Direct assessment depends on the volume loss of the hippocampus or the parahippocampus, while indirect assessment relies on the enlargement of the parahippocampal fissures. Direct assessment is comparatively more sensitive and specific and has been shown to predict the progression of MCI to dementia (28). The MTA scale is a commonly used visual assessment scale that has been clinically and neuropathologically validated. The MTA score has demonstrated significant ability to distinguish AD patients from those with vascular cognitive impairment or DLB (29). Clinically, AD is characterised by a cognitive decline in the form of episodic memory deficits. As the disease progresses, patients may also experience psychological and behavioural problems such as mood disorders, aphasia, visuospatial difficulties, executive dysfunction, and sleep disorders (28),(30). A decrease in the concentration of NAA in the frontal, parietal, temporal lobes, and the hippocampi is commonly seen in AD patients. Various neurodegenerative conditions feature reduced levels of NAA (15). Studies have shown that elevated glial metabolite, myo-inositol/creatine (mL/Cr) levels, and decreased NAA/Cr levels are associated with AD patients (17). Thus, the combination of high mI and low NAA in MRS assists in the early diagnosis of AD (18).

Vascular Dementia (VaD)

The VaD is the second most common type of dementia, and MR images of VaD patients show periventricular white matter hyperintensities (31). Multi-infarct dementia, a subtype of VaD, results from a series of small strokes that lead to permanent brain damage. These patients develop early symptoms such as mood changes and difficulties in understanding, concentrating, and planning. As the disease progresses, patients may show signs of confusion, difficulty following instructions, and inappropriate laughing or crying, along with loss of bladder or bowel control (32). Some symptoms of VaD are similar to those of AD (33),(34).

Binswanger’s disease, another subtype of VaD, arises due to arteriosclerosis and thromboembolism, affecting blood vessels that impact white matter and other subcortical structures. (Table/Fig 11) highlights an example of this rare type of VaD. Most patients experience progressive memory loss, urinary urgency, and an unsteady walking pattern (35),(36). Hyperintense signals on T2-weighted images and Fluid-attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) images aid in the distinct visualisation of both small and large vessel diseases and in identifying microhaemorrhages (37). Additionally, there is a variable appearance with multifocal asymmetrical abnormalities in affected brain regions (10).

Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD)

The FTD consists of three subtypes: behavioural variant, primary progressive aphasia, and motor disorder (31). MRI helps to determine the region and extent of atrophy, which enables the diagnosis of FTD. (Table/Fig 12) is an example of a patient who was diagnosed with FTD (38). The various FTD subtypes seen in literature are the behavioural and semantic variants of FTD, corticobasal syndrome, non fluent agrammatic variant of FTD, and FTD-associated motor neuron disease. Moreover, some patients with FTD present progressive supranuclear palsy in combination, primarily affecting movement. However, in the scope of the present study, only the behavioural variant of FTD and semantic variant of FTD will be discussed (39). (Table/Fig 13) describes the clinical and radiological findings of these two subtypes of FTD.

There is an overlap between the cortical regions affected by atrophy in FTD and AD. FTD shows relatively more atrophy in the frontal lobes, whereas AD shows more atrophy in the lateral, parietal, and occipital cortices (29). This type of dementia is diagnosed in patients within the age group of the 40s to early 60s. The behavioural variant of FTD typically shows asymmetrical frontal and temporal cortical atrophy (31). The semantic variant of FTD typically shows anterior temporal and ventral temporal association area atrophy, in turn, affecting the patient’s ability to use and understand language, whereas progressive non fluent aphasia affects the patient’s ability to speak. Some of the common symptoms of FTD are behavioural changes, impaired judgement, decreased self-awareness, and frequent mood changes, while physical symptoms involve tremors, poor coordination, muscle weakness, etc., (40).

Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)

The MCI is an early stage of loss in cognitive abilities, such as memory, language, or judgement. The symptoms of people diagnosed with MCI are not severe enough to interfere significantly with daily activities (41),(42). The level of memory deficit may remain stable in MCI patients for years, which is unlikely in the case of AD, where cognitive abilities decline gradually (43). A person diagnosed with MCI may be at risk of developing AD or other related dementias (42). The MTA score gives a strong indication of the progression of MCI to Alzheimer’s dementia (23). MRI is extensively used to diagnose MCI and to differentiate it from AD.

The hippocampal T2 prolongation serves as a unique marker to distinguish MCI from AD. Apart from this, MRI T2 signal decay has been used to measure white matter damage in patients with MCI, owing to its sensitivity to water content. Moreover, patients with MCI have a smaller entorhinal cortex and hippocampus compared to healthy subjects. According to many recent studies, hippocampal volume predicts the transformation of MCI to AD (44).

(Table/Fig 14) is a comparative illustration of the MRI scans of a control, an MCI patient, and an AD patient. In the present study, The MR volumetry showed a mild reduction in the whole brain and hippocampal volume. MRS exhibited a slight to moderate reduction in NAA, which is suggestive of neuronal loss. In most patients, a symmetric and maintained cerebral perfusion was identified. (Table/Fig 15) is an example of a female patient diagnosed with MCI.

Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH)

The NPH is one of the few dementias that is potentially reversible, and its timely diagnosis can result in the reversal of symptoms (45). This syndrome can occur in people of any age but is most common in the elderly and may result from head trauma, infection, subarachnoid haemorrhage, tumour, etc., (46). MRI is the best modality to image the morphological changes observed in NPH, and this can be further supported by CSF flow studies, MRS, and CT scans (47).

Radiographic features demonstrate periventricular hyperintensities, thinning of the corpus callosum, widening of temporal horns without hippocampal atrophy, enlarged Sylvian fissures, and basal cisterns (48). In NPH, changes in brain water content are observed as high T2-FLAIR signals on MRI scans and as periventricular hypodensity on CT scans (47). (Table/Fig 16) shows examples of two of the present study NPH patients.

Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB)

The DLB is a form of progressive dementia that affects an individual’s ability to reason, think, and process information, ultimately leading to a decline in independent function (49). People with DLB have characteristic features, including recurrent visual hallucinations, changes in attention and alertness, and confusion (50). DLB typically presents in older adults (50-70 years of age) and is usually sporadic (51). Structural studies measuring cortical thickness demonstrate that DLB patients show lower levels of volume loss in the amygdala, temporal lobe (including less pronounced grey matter loss in the temporal lobe), and hippocampus when compared to AD patients (52). Generally, DLB patients do not show deterioration in the formation of episodic memory, as observed in AD. However, impairments in visuospatial and attention tasks have been reported. The midbrain, particularly the substantia innominata and putamen, exhibit greater decline in volume and atrophy in DLB compared to AD (53).

Other Dementias

Apart from the types mentioned in this paper, other dementias or conditions that cause dementia-like symptoms include behavioural variant FTD, brain tumours causing dementia, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, Huntington’s disease, chronic traumatic encephalopathy, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-associated dementia, and Parkinson-like disease. MRI is used to characterise these dementias at the structural level to guide the diagnosis of the patient and direct them towards appropriate management (10).

Limitation(s)

Although the present study of 125 patients underscores the importance of brain volumetry and MRS in differentiating types of dementia, a more detailed evaluation with a larger study group should be conducted to establish these methods as a gold standard for diagnosis. Molecular imaging was not included in the present study due to the low volume of available data. Compared to existing literature, the present study noted some differences, which may be attributed to demographic, environmental, and genetic factors.

Conclusion

Neuroimaging modalities are enabling healthcare practitioners to diagnose dementia using biomarkers. MR volumetry is yet another tool that assists in the differential diagnosis of dementia types.

References

1.
Hsu YY, Du AT, Schuff N, Weiner MW. Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy in dementias. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2001;14(3):145-66. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/089198870101400308. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Su L, Blamire AM, Watson R, He J, Hayes L, O’Brien JT. Whole-brain patterns of 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging in Alzheimer’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies. Transl Psychiatry. 2016;6(8):e877. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/TP.2016.140. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Types of Dementia Explained n.d. Available at: https://www.webmd.com/alzheimers/guide/alzheimers-dementia. (Accessed June 12, 2023).
4.
Dementia statistics | Alzheimer’s Disease International (ADI) n.d. Available at: https://www.alzint.org/about/dementia-facts-figures/dementia-statistics/. (Accessed November 20, 2023).
5.
Dementia n.d. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dementia. (Accessed November 20, 2023).
6.
Kantarci K. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in common dementias. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2013;23:393. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NIC.2012.10.004. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Dementia: 6 Signs to Look For n.d. Available at: https://www.webmd.com/alzheimers/signs-dementia. (Accessed November 20, 2023).
8.
Dementia n.d. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dementia. (Accessed June 12, 2023).
9.
Staffaroni AM, Elahi FM, McDermott D, Marton K, Karageorgiou E, Sacco S, et al. Neuroimaging in Dementia. Semin Neurol. 2017;37(5):510-37. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0037-1608808. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Patel KP, Wymer DT, Bhatia VK, Duara R, Rajadhyaksha CD. Multimodality imaging of dementia: Clinical importance and role of integrated anatomic and molecular imaging. Radiographics. 2020;40(1):200-22. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1148/RG.2020190070/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/RG.2020190070.FIG19A.JPEG. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Volumetric Analysis Of Brain Structure | Sampurna Sodani n.d. Available at: https://www.sampurnadiagnostics.com/volumetricanalysisofbrainstructure. (Accessed June 12, 2023).
12.
Lee H, Wiggermann V, Rauscher A, Kames C, Beg MF, Popuri K, et al. Brain imaging abnormalities in mixed Alzheimer’s and subcortical vascular dementia. Can J Neurol Sci. 2023;50(4):515-28. Doi: 10.1017/cjn.2022.65.[crossref]
13.
Zeinali R, Keshtkar A, Zamani A, Gharehaghaji N. Brain volume estimation enhancement by morphological image processing tools. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2017;7(4):379-88. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22086/jbpe.v0i0.586.
14.
Maclaren J, Han Z, Vos SB, Fischbein N, Bammer R. Reliability of brain volume measurements: A test-retest dataset. Sci Data. 2014;1:01-09. Available at: https:// doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2014.37. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Maul S, Giegling I, Rujescu D. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in common dementias-current status and perspectives. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:549833. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYT.2020.00769/BIBTEX. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Kantarci K. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in common dementias. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2013;23(3):393-06. Available at: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/J.NIC.2012.10.004. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Klunk WE, Panchalingam K, Moossy J, McClure RJ, Pettegrew JW. N-acetyl- L-aspartate and other amino acid metabolites in Alzheimer’s disease brain: A preliminary proton nuclear magnetic resonance study. Neurology. 1992;42(8):1578-85. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.42.8.1578. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Gaillard F. Medial temporal lobe atrophy score. Radiopaedia Org. 2014. Available at: https://doi.org/10.53347/RID-28451. [crossref]
19.
The Radiology Assistant: Dementia- Role of MRI n.d. Available at: https:// radiologyassistant.nl/neuroradiology/dementia/role-of-mri. (Accessed June 20, 2023).
20.
Rosa-Neto P. Brain imaging using CT and MRI n.d.
21.
The Radiology Assistant: Dementia-Role of MRI n.d. Available at: https:// radiologyassistant.nl/neuroradiology/dementia/role-of-mri#assessment-of-mr-in-dementia-mta-scale-for-medial-temporal-lobe-atrophy. (Accessed June 20, 2023).
22.
El-Feky M, Gaillard F. Fazekas scale for white matter lesions. RadiopaediaOrg 2014. Available at: https://doi.org/10.53347/RID-28447. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
The Radiology Assistant: Dementia-Role of MRI n.d. Available at: https:// radiologyassistant.nl/neuroradiology/dementia/role-of-mri#assessment-of-mr-in-dementia-koedam-score-for-parietal-atrophy. (Accessed June 20, 2023).
24.
Moonis G, Subramaniam RM, Trofimova A, Burns J, Bykowski J, Chakraborty S, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria® dementia. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020;17(5S):S100- S112. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JACR.2020.01.040. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Wippold FJ, Brown DC, Broderick DF, Burns J, Corey AS, Deshmukh TK, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria dementia and movement disorders. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12(1):19-28. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JACR.2014.09.025. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Kato T, Inui Y, Nakamura A, Ito K. Brain fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET in dementia. Ageing Res Rev. 2016;30:73-84. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J. ARR.2016.02.003. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Teune LK, Bartels AL, Leenders KL, Teune LK, Bartels AL, Leenders KL. FDG-PET imaging in neurodegenerative brain diseases. Functional Brain Mapping and the Endeavor to Understand the Working Brain. 2013. Available at: https:// doi.org/10.5772/56505.
28.
Knipe H, Gaillard F. Alzheimer disease. RadiopaediaOrg. 2011. Available at: https://doi.org/10.53347/RID-13455. [crossref]
29.
Brain Imaging in Differential Diagnosis of Dementia-Practical Neurology n.d. Available at: https://practicalneurology.com/articles/2019-june/brain-imaging-in-differential-diagnosis-of-dementia. (Accessed June 20, 2023).
30.
Scheltens P. Imaging in Alzheimer’s disease. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2009;11(2):191-99. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2009.11.2/ PSCHELTENS. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Furtner J, Prayer D. Neuroimaging in dementia. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2021;171(11-12): 274-81. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/S10354-021- 00825-X. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Multi-infarct dementia: Symptoms, causes, diagnosis, and more n.d. Available at: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/multi-infarct-dementia#causes. (Accessed June 22, 2023).
33.
Vascular Dementia: Causes, Symptoms, and Treatments | National Institute on Aging n.d. Available at: https://www.nia.nih.gov/health/vascular-dementia. (Accessed June 22, 2023).
34.
Farooq MU, Min J, Goshgarian C, Gorelick PB. Pharmacotherapy for vascular cognitive impairment. CNS Drugs. 2017;31(9):759-76. Available at: https://doi. org/10.1007/S40263-017-0459-3. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Binswanger Disease-Symptoms, Causes, Treatment | NORD n.d. Available at: https:// rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/binswanger-disease/. (Accessed June 22, 2023).
36.
Huisa BN, Rosenberg GA. Binswanger’s disease: Diagnosis and management. Expert Rev Neurother. 2014;14(10):1203-13. Available at: https://doi.org/10.158 6/14737175.2014.956726. [crossref][PubMed]
37.
Banerjee D, Muralidharan A, Mohammed ARH, Malik BH. Neuroimaging in dementia: A brief review. Cureus. 2020;12(6):e8682. Available at: https://doi. org/10.7759/CUREUS.8682. [crossref]
38.
How do we diagnose FTD disorders? | Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center | Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania n.d. Available at: https://www.med.upenn.edu/ftd/how-do-we-diagnose-ftd-disorders.html. (Accessed July 19, 2023).
39.
Finger EC. Frontotemporal Dementias. Continuum: Lifelong Learning in Neurology. 2016;22:464. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1212/CON.0000000000000300. [crossref][PubMed]
40.
Frontotemporal Dementia | Johns Hopkins Medicine n.d. Available at: https://www. hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/dementia/frontotemporal-dementia. (Accessed June 22, 2023).
41.
Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) | Symptoms & Treatments |alz.org n.d. Available at: https://www.alz.org/alzheimers-dementia/what-is-dementia/related_conditions/ mild-cognitive-impairment. (Accessed June 22, 2023).
42.
What is mild cognitive impairment? n.d. Available at: https://www.alzheimers.gov/ alzheimers-dementias/mild-cognitive-impairment. (Accessed June 22, 2023).
43.
Mild Cognitive Impairment | Memory and Aging Center n.d. Available at: https:// memory.ucsf.edu/dementia/mild-cognitive-impairment. (Accessed June 22, 2023).
44.
Yin CH, Li SO, Zhao WN, Feng JC. Brain imaging of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Neural Regen Res. 2013;8:435. Available at: https:// doi.org/10.3969/J.ISSN.1673-5374.2013.05.007.
45.
Shprecher D, Schwalb J, Kurlan R. Normal pressure hydrocephalus: Diagnosis and treatment. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2008;8(5):371-76. Available at: https:// doi.org/10.1007/S11910-008-0058-2. [crossref][PubMed]
46.
Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke n.d. Available at: https://www.ninds.nih.gov/health-information/disorders/ normal-pressure-hydrocephalus. (Accessed July 11, 2023).
47.
El-Feky M, Singh G. Normal pressure hydrocephalus. RadiopaediaOrg. 2009. Available at: https://doi.org/10.53347/RID-6306. [crossref][PubMed]
48.
Damasceno BP. Neuroimaging in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Dement Neuropsychol. 2015;9(4):350-55. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980- 57642015DN94000350. [crossref][PubMed]
49.
Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) | Symptoms & Causes|alz.org n.d. Available at: https://www.alz.org/alzheimers-dementia/what-is-dementia/types-of-dementia/ dementia-with-lewy-bodies. (Accessed July 11, 2023).
50.
Dementia with Lewy bodies- NHS n.d. Available at: https://www.nhs.uk/ conditions/dementia-with-lewy-bodies/. (Accessed July 11, 2023).
52.
Sharma R, Ho ML. Dementia with Lewy bodies. RadiopaediaOrg. 2009. Available at: https://doi.org/10.53347/RID-7270. [crossref]
52.
Saha A, Banerjee D. Neuroimaging in dementia with lewy bodies. Cureus. 2021;13(6):e15694. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7759/CUREUS.15694. [crossref]
53.
Mak E, Su L, Williams GB, O’Brien JT. Neuroimaging characteristics of dementia with Lewy bodies. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2014;6(2):18. Available at: https://doi. org/10.1186/ALZRT248.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/67220.19055

Date of Submission: Aug 28, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Nov 15, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Dec 21, 2023
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? No
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 01, 2023
• Manual Googling: Oct 13, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Dec 18, 2023 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com