Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 51491

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : February | Volume : 18 | Issue : 2 | Page : OC01 - OC04 Full Version

Clinical Manifestations and Treatment Outcomes of Brucella Endocarditis: A Retrospective Cohort Study at a Tertiary Cardiac Centre in Bengaluru, Karnataka, India


Published: February 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/66400.19035
Jagadeesan Naveena, KR Nishanth, Nanjunda Swamy Prapulla Kumari, Puttaswamy Nandhini, Karur Kavitha, CN Manjunath

1. Professor, Department of Microbiology, Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Cardiology, Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 3. Microbiologist, Department of Microbiology, Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 5. Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 6. Professor, Department of Cardiology, Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. KR Nishanth,
Room No 9, Professors Chambers, SJICR, Bengaluru-560041, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: kr.nishanth@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Brucella is a rare cause of Infective Endocarditis (IE), requiring prompt early recognition and treatment to prevent life-threatening complications. Diagnosis is often missed or delayed, leading to an increase in cardiac morbidity and mortality.

Aim: To analyse the clinical profile, laboratory parameters, cardiac manifestations, management patterns, and outcomes of Brucella endocarditis.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Department of Cardiology, Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research, Bangaluru, Karnataka, India on patients with blood culture-confirmed Brucella endocarditis, diagnosed using modified Duke’s criteria between January 2010 and December 2021. The present study evaluated the clinical presentation, treatment modalities, and outcomes. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed.

Results: A total of 34 cases were identified during the study period. The mean age of the patients was 35.6±14 years (age range: 15-66 years), with 82.4% males and 17.6% females. Underlying valvular heart disease was present in 82.4% of the patients, while 17.6% had no pre-existing valvular heart disease. Both aortic and mitral valves were involved with equal frequency. All patients presented with fever. Most patients had a normal leukocyte count (61.8%). Thrombocytopenia (32.3%) and pancytopenia (17.6%) were also observed. Large vegetations (>1 cm) were seen in 38.2% of patients, and complications related to IE were observed in 35.2%. The majority of patients (82.4%) were managed medically alone in the acute phase. The antibiotic regimen of doxycycline with rifampicin combined with intravenous gentamicin was used in the majority of the patients. The observed mortality rate was 17.6%.

Conclusion: Brucella endocarditis can present with thrombocytopenia/pancytopenia along with normal or reduced leukocyte count. The addition of intravenous gentamicin to oral therapy may reduce relapse rates.

Keywords

Brucellosis, Doxycycline, Vegetations

Human brucellosis is a zoonotic disease transmitted through the consumption of infected unpasteurised milk, dairy products, inhaled aerosols, and direct contact with infected animal parts (1). The causative pathogen is a gram-negative intracellular bacillus of the genus Brucella, which leads to chronic granulomatous infection with multiorgan involvement (1). The bacteria usually grow in the regional lymph nodes and enter the bloodstream through the ductus thoracicus (1). Brucellosis cases have been reported from countries across the globe, with the highest concentration of cases in Central Asia and the Mediterranean region (1),(2),(3).

Cardiovascular manifestations of brucellosis include Infective Endocarditis (IE), myocarditis, and pericarditis, occurring in about 2% of infections (4). IE is the major cause of mortality in brucellosis, accounting for 70-80% of deaths (5). Being a slow-growing, fastidious organism, and given the limitations of serological tests, the diagnosis of brucellosis poses significant challenges and is often missed (1). The prevalence of Brucella endocarditis is 1.3-1.7% (3). Data from India is limited to case reports and case series (3),(6),(7). Haematological parameters and treatment outcomes have not been evaluated in India. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical manifestations, cardiac involvement, treatment modalities, and outcomes in Brucella endocarditis from a tertiary cardiac care centre in India.

Material and Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Department of Cardiology, Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research, Bangaluru, Karnataka, India by reviewing medical records. Patients diagnosed with Infective Endocarditis (IE) and isolation of Brucella species in blood culture between January 2010 and December 2021 at Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research, India, were included in the study. The study was planned in the year 2022, with data analysis and interpretation completed in the same year. A total of 34 patients were included in the study. Institutional Ethics Committee approval (SJICR/EC/2021-2022/034) was obtained for the study.

Inclusion criteria:

• Patients diagnosed with definite IE as per the modified Duke criteria [8,9].
• Isolation of Brucella species in blood culture.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with only serological diagnosis (i.e., elevated antibody titers) of brucellosis but without organism isolation in blood culture were excluded.

Study Procedure

Blood culture isolation and identification of Brucella species were performed using the automated Bact/Alert culture media and VITEK 2 system (Biomerieux, USA) (10),(11). The Standard Agglutination Test (SAT) (10),(11), which measures total agglutinating antibodies {Immunoglobulin M (IgM) and Immunoglobulin G (IgG)}, was used to detect antibody titers. A single titer of >1:640 was considered significant (11),(12).

Clinical symptoms and signs at presentation were evaluated. Dyspnoea was graded based on the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (13). Anaemia was defined as a haemoglobin value of <12 g/dL in females and <13 g/dL in males. Thrombocytopenia was defined as a platelet count of <1.5 lac/mm3. Liver transaminase elevation of >2 times the upper limit of normal was considered significant. Serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL was considered as renal impairment. Treatment regimens and antibiotics used, along with dosages, were evaluated. Relapse and mortality rates were studied. Medical management included treatment with antibiotics and heart failure medications.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistical analyses were conducted for variables of interest. Results of continuous measurements are presented as mean or median. Results of categorical measurements are presented as numbers (%). For data analysis, Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 18.0 statistical software and the R environment version 3.2.2 were used.

Results

Between January 2010 and December 2021, a total of 34 patients with definite Infective Endocarditis (IE) and Brucella isolate in blood culture were identified and included in the study. The mean age of the population was 35.6±14 years (age range 15-66 years), with 82.4% males and 17.6% females. The symptoms at presentation and underlying heart disease are summarised in (Table/Fig 1). A history of fever was present in all patients at presentation. The median duration of fever was one month, and the longest duration of fever was seven months.

The majority of patients (82.4%) had underlying structural heart disease, with rheumatic heart disease being the most common (64.7%). The blood investigations and laboratory parameters are summarised in (Table/Fig 2). Normal leukocyte count was seen in most patients (61.8%), and thrombocytopenia was noted in about one-third of the patients. About one-third of the patients had renal impairment at presentation, defined as a serum creatinine value of more than 1.5 mg/dL. Both aortic and mitral valves were involved with equal frequency (41.2%), as shown in (Table/Fig 3). Tricuspid and pulmonary valve involvement were not observed. Large vegetations (size >1 cm) were seen in 38.2% of patients, and complications related to IE were noted in 35.2% of the patients (Table/Fig 3). Antibody titers measured by the Standard Agglutination Test (SAT) were >1:640 in all patients. Most patients (82.4%) were managed medically in the acute phase, and the antibiotic protocols are shown in (Table/Fig 4). The overall mortality rate noted in the present study was 17.6%, with relapse of the disease seen in 5.8% of the patients. All patients had heart failure with severe valve regurgitation.

Discussion

Brucellosis can present acutely, subacutely, or chronically (4). Infective Endocarditis (IE), which can lead to degeneration of the native valve and heart failure if left untreated, is a major cause of mortality in brucellosis (4). Human brucellosis is often described as a disease with diverse manifestations (1). Fever is almost always present in most patients (1),(12), and in the present study, all patients had fever at presentation. The challenges associated with a microbiological diagnosis of brucellosis, even in the presence of valve vegetations, often result in delays, and several studies have reported a prolonged duration of fever associated with the disease (6),(14),(15). The median duration of fever in the present study was one month, with the longest duration recorded being seven months. In a study by Keshtkar JM et al., the mean duration of symptoms was 99.7 days (15). While fever is the most common symptom, it may not be present in all patients, as observed in the Gulhane study where 11.3% of patients did not have fever at presentation (16). The presence of dyspnoea in brucellosis suggests possible cardiac involvement. Although brucellosis is known to cause reactive arthritis, joint pain can also occur in IE due to other organisms and has limited localising value (1). In this study, 17.6% of patients reported a history of arthralgia. The bacteria has a tropism for the reticuloendothelial system, and the presence of lymphadenopathy can raise suspicion of brucellosis in a patient with IE; however, the incidence of clinically significant lymphadenopathy is low (7-10%) (1). None of the patients in the present study had significant lymphadenopathy on physical examination. Splenomegaly was noted in 23.5% of the patients.

Haematological findings commonly seen in brucellosis include anaemia, mild leucopenia with relative lymphocytosis, and thrombocytopenia. In the present study, the majority of patients (61.1%) had a normal leucocyte count, with leucopenia observed in 14.7% of patients. The Gulhane study (16) also reported that the majority of patients had a normal leucocyte count (Mean: 6964.9/mm3, Range: 2500-13100/mm3). Leucocytosis was observed in patients who had complications of IE, such as perivalvular abscess and systemic embolism. Thrombocytopenia and pancytopenia are frequently seen in brucella infections (1) and were observed in 32.3% and 17.6% of patients, respectively. These findings have been attributed to hypersplenism and bone marrow involvement (1),(14). The presence of thrombocytopenia and pancytopenia in IE should raise a suspicion of brucellosis. Thrombocytopenia and pancytopenia normalised in all patients who showed clinical improvement with antibiotic therapy.

The laboratory diagnosis of brucellosis includes blood culture, serological tests, and nucleic acid amplification assays (10),(11). Brucella is a slow-growing, fastidious organism. With modern automated blood culture systems, the mean time for identification ranges from 3-7 days, and sometimes subculture growths have been identified as late as 20 days (11),(12). In the present study, Bact/Alert media was used for culture, and the mean duration of blood culture growth was 5.8 days. Brucella melitensis was isolated in all cultures. In cases of IE, especially when Brucella is suspected, it is advisable to incubate blood cultures beyond 7-10 days. Additionally, bone marrow cultures are recommended in cases with a strong suspicion due to Brucella’s affinity for the reticuloendothelial system. For serological tests detecting antibodies, the diagnostic cut-off is a titer of >1:160 in non endemic areas and >1:320 in endemic areas (12). In our study, a Standard Agglutination Test (SAT) was performed to detect antibodies, and the titers were >1:640 in all patients.

Brucella endocarditis can affect normal, damaged, and prosthetic heart valves (15),(16). In the present study, the majority of patients (64.7%) had underlying Rheumatic Heart Disease (RHD), 14.8% had prosthetic mechanical valves, and 17.6% had no pre-existing valve disease. Brucella endocarditis was observed in patients with no pre-existing valvular disease in 30.6% of patients in a study by Keshtkar JM et al., and in 39.6% in the Gulhane study (15),(16). The most commonly involved valve in Brucella endocarditis, as reported in the literature, is the aortic valve, with involvement ranging from 52-70% in most studies (15),(16),(17). In this study, both the aortic and mitral valves were involved with equal frequency. The higher incidence of mitral valve involvement in the present study is due to the higher incidence of RHD in India, where mitral valve involvement is predominant. Brucella endocarditis is associated with large vegetations and systemic embolisation. Approximately one-third of patients in the present study had vegetations larger than 1 cm, and 14.7% of patients had systemic embolisation, including stroke and limb ischaemia. Aortic perivalvular abscesses have been frequently reported with brucellosis (15),(16),(18). Five patients in the present study had an aortic perivalvular abscess, and one of them led to a sinus of Valsalva aneurysm. No significant conduction system abnormalities were noted in the present study.

The management of brucella endocarditis includes medical and surgical treatment based on the severity of valve involvement and complications (15),(16),(17),(18),(19). In the present study, 82.4% of the patients were managed medically during the acute phase. Rifampicin (450-600 mg/24 h) and doxycycline (200 mg/24 h) were used in all patients for a total duration of three months. For patients with paravalvular complications, large vegetations, prosthetic valves, and those requiring surgery, additional Intravenous (i.v.) gentamycin was administered for four weeks. A few patients (23.5%) also received oral co-trimoxazole (960 mg/24 h) in addition to rifampicin and doxycycline, at the discretion of the treating physician. The number of patients in the present study is too small to compare the different antibiotic regimens. The ESC guidelines (9) propose using a combination of doxycycline, rifampicin, and cotrimoxazole for 3-6 months, and some authors recommend adding gentamycin for the first four weeks (15),(16),(19). Relapse was observed in 2 (5.8%) patients. Both patients had received an oral antibiotic regimen of doxycycline and rifampicin for 12 weeks without any intravenous drug. The results of the Gulhane study (16) showed that mortality was lowest in patients who received i.v. aminoglycoside in addition to the oral regimen. A study by Jia B et al., also showed a lower relapse rate with the addition of quinolone or aminoglycoside (20). Due to the lack of large series, the optimal duration of treatment is still unclear. Patients without complications or severe valve lesions can be managed medically alone (16),(17),(19).

In the present study, emergency surgery was performed on six patients in the acute phase of IE who had severe valve regurgitation, paravalvular abscess, and refractory heart failure not responding to medical treatment. The mortality rate associated with emergency surgery was 33.3%. Emergency surgery is reserved for patients with paravalvular complications or refractory heart failure that is not stabilised by medical management, and it carries a higher perioperative mortality compared to elective surgery (15),(16),(17). Patients with significant valve lesions who were stabilised medically in the acute phase underwent elective surgery after six weeks. Elective surgery after completion six weeks of antibiotic therapy is preferred in such patients (15),(17). There was no mortality associated with elective surgery in the present study. All patients who underwent surgical treatment received four weeks of intravenous gentamycin during their hospitalisation in addition to oral antibiotics. Oral rifampicin and doxycycline were continued postoperatively to complete a total duration of three months. A review by Keshtkar JM et al., showed that combined medical and surgical treatment decreased mortality from 32.7% in the medical group to 6.7% in the combined surgical and medical treatment group (15). A combined approach is necessary for patients with significant valve lesions to improve outcomes.

The meta-analysis by Narimisa N et al., reported a mortality rate of 26% for brucella endocarditis (3). In the present study, the observed mortality rate was 17.6%. All patients in the study had heart failure with severe valve regurgitation. Two-thirds of these patients had multiorgan involvement, which deemed them very high-risk for surgery in the acute phase. One-third of the patients who died had undergone emergency surgery with valve replacement. Risk factors for mortality included refractory heart failure requiring surgery in the acute phase and multiorgan dysfunction. Patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis in the present study did not experience any complications and were managed solely with medical treatment. A recent review demonstrated favourable outcomes in patients with brucella prosthetic valve IE when timely treatment was provided (21).

Limitation(s)

The limitations of the present study include a small sample size and a retrospective cohort design. Detailed data regarding contact with farm animals or animal products were not available. Additionally, information on antibody titers post-treatment during follow-up was not accessible. Despite these limitations, the current study contributes to the limited knowledge about Brucella endocarditis.

Conclusion

Brucella endocarditis is frequently characterised by the presence of large vegetations and can lead to paravalvular and embolic complications. The presence of thrombocytopenia/pancytopenia with a normal or reduced leukocyte count in a patient with endocarditis should raise a suspicion of brucellosis. Prolonged incubation of blood cultures is necessary when there is a clinical suspicion. The addition of intravenous gentamycin to oral therapy may help decrease relapse rates.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Professor Dr. BG Mantur (Belgaum), Professors Dr. Nagarathna Chandrashekar and Dr. Veena Kumai HB from NIMHANS, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India, microbiology technologists at Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research for helping in serological testing.

References

1.
Pappas G, Akritidis N, Bosilkovski M, Tsianos E. Brucellosis. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(22):2325-36. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra050570. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Pappas G, Papadimitriou P, Akritidis N, Christou L, Tsianos EV. The new global map of human brucellosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6(2):91-99. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70382-6. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Narimisa N, Razavi S, Khoshbayan A, Masjedian Jazi F. Prevalence of Brucella endocarditis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Sci Rep. 2023;6(5):e1301. Doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1301. PMID: 37251523; PMCID: PMC10213485. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Colmenero JD, Reguera JM, Martos F, Sánchez-DMD, Delgado M, Causse M, et al. Complications associated with Brucella melitensis infection: A study of 530 cases. Medicine. 1996;75(4):195-211. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005792- 199607000-00003. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Peery TM, Belter LF. Brucellosis and heart disease. II. Fatal brucellosis: A review of the literature and report of new cases. Am J Pathol. 1960;36:673-95.
6.
Raju IT, Solanki R, Patnaik AN, Kumari NR, Gulati AS. Brucella endocarditis- A series of five case reports. Indian Heart J. 2013;65(1):72-77. http://doi. org/10.1016/j.ihj.2012.12.017. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Kaushik M, Chauhan V, Chahota R, Pathania JS. Brucella endocarditis: A forgotten entity. IHJ Cardiovascular Case Reports. 2019;3(1):01-03. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ihjccr.2019.04.003. [crossref]
8.
Li JS, Sexton DJ, Mick N, Nettles R, Fowler Jr VG, Ryan T, et al. Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30(4):633-38. https://doi.org/10.1086/313753. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Habib G, Lancellotti P, Antunes MJ, Bongiorni MG, Casalta JP, Del Zotti F, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis: The task force for the management of infective endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). Eur Heart J. 2015;36(44):3075-128. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv319. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Cekovska Z, Petrovska M, Jankoska G, Panovski N, Kaftandzieva A. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility of brucella blood culture isolates. Prilozi. 2010;31(1):117-32.
11.
Yagupsky P, Morata P, Colmenero JD. Laboratory diagnosis of human Brucellosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019;33(1):e00073-19. Doi: 10.1128/CMR.00073-19. PMID: 31722888; PMCID: PMC6860005. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Edathodu J, Alamri M, Alshangiti KA, Alfagyh NS, Alnaghmush AS, Albaiz F, et al. Clinical manifestations and treatment outcomes of human brucellosis at a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med. 2021;41(2):109-14. https:// doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2021.109. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, Allen LA, Byun JJ, Colvin MM, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the management of Heart failure: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022;145(18):e876-e894. [crossref]
14.
Buzgan T, Karahocagil MK, Irmak H, Baran AI, Karsen H, Evirgen O, et al. Clinical manifestations and complications in 1028 cases of brucellosis: A retrospective evaluation and review of the literature. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14(6):e469-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2009.06.031. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Keshtkar JM, Razavi SM, Gholamin S, Hossain M, Sajadi MM. Medical versus medical and surgical treatment for brucella endocarditis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94(6):2141-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.07.006. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Koruk ST, Erdem H, Koruk I, Erbay A, Tezer-Tekce Y, Erbay AR, et al. Management of Brucella endocarditis: Results of the Gulhane study. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012;40(2):145-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.04.009. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Sasmazel A, Baysal A, Fedakar A, Buğra O, Özkokeli M, Büyükbayrak F, et al. Treatment of Brucella endocarditis: 15 years of clinical and surgical experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89(5):1432-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. athoracsur.2010.01.048. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Inan MB, Eyileten ZB, Ozcinar E, Yazicioglu L, Sirlak M, Eryilmaz S, et al. Native valve Brucella endocarditis. Clin Cardiol. 2010;33(2):E20-E26. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.01.048. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Mert A, Kocak F, Ozaras R, Tabak F, Bilir M, Kucukuglu S. The role of antibiotic treatment alone for the management of Brucella endocarditis in adults: A case report and literature review. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;8(6):381-85.
20.
Jia B, Zhang F, Lu Y, Zhang W, Li J, Zhang Y. The clinical features of 590 patients with brucellosis in Xinjiang, China with the emphasis on the treatment of complications. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(5):e0005577. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005577. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Karima T, Fatma H, Hedi G. Brucella prosthetic valve endocarditis: A systematic review. J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2021;33(3):198-212. https://doi.org/10.37616/2212- 5043.1257.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/66400.19035

Date of Submission: Jul 09, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Sep 26, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Nov 30, 2023
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 11, 2023
• Manual Googling: Oct 12, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Nov 27, 2023 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com