Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 186396

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : February | Volume : 18 | Issue : 2 | Page : NC01 - NC06 Full Version

Ocular Diseases Presenting in Post-COVID-19 Patients: A Cross-sectional Study Conducted at a Tertiary Institute in Andhra Pradesh, Southern India


Published: February 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/67584.19040
Muralidhar Parri

1. Associate Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, AIIMS, Mangalagiri, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Muralidhar Parri,
Associate Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, AIIMS, Mangalagiri, Guntur-522503, Andhra Pradesh, India.
E-mail: drmurali7@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which started in December 2019, has rapidly spread across the globe. Although the prevalence of COVID-19 disease has significantly decreased, there are cases of post-COVID-19 complications affecting multiple organ systems, including the eyes.

Aim: To evaluate ocular diseases presenting in post-COVID-19 patients and their association with demographic profiles, duration of post-COVID-19, and the type of treatment received.

Materials and Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted over a four-month period (August 2021 to November 2021) in the Department of Ophthalmology at AIIMS, Mangalagiri, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India. The study focused on post-COVID-19 patients who had been affected by COVID-19 no more than three months prior. Patients who were not post-COVID-19 and those who had contracted COVID-19 during the first wave were excluded from the study. The patients’ clinical history and symptoms were documented. Visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and detailed anterior and posterior segment findings were recorded for all patients. The study aimed to assess post-COVID-19 ocular complications and any potential associations with hospital stays, steroid intake, or oxygen inhalation on eye diseases. Mean and median calculations were performed for continuous variables, and a Chi-square test was used to study associations. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0 was employed, and a p-value <0.05 was deemed significant.

Results: In the present study, males constituted 41 (62.1%) and females constituted 25 (37.9%), with a male-to-female ratio of 1.64:1. The majority of patients 23 (34.8%) were above 50 years old. Most patients 24 (36.4%) developed eye diseases one month after their COVID-19 infection. Out of 66 patients, 11 (16.7%) were diabetic, 8 (12.1%) were hypertensive, and 40 (60.6%) had no associated co-morbidities. During their COVID-19 illness, 53 (80.3%) patients underwent home isolation and received supportive treatment, while 13 (19.7%) patients were hospitalised. The most common ocular disease observed was conjunctivitis 39 (59.1% of patients) following post-COVID-19. Additionally, 4 (6%) patients developed central serous chorioretinopathy, 4 (6%) developed refractive errors, 5 (7.6%) experienced persistent headaches, and 2 (3%) developed orbital mucormycosis.

Conclusion: The present study presents ophthalmic manifestations in post-COVID-19 patients. Conjunctivitis was found to be the most common ocular disease, more prevalent one month after the COVID-19 infection. COVID-19 retinopathy was the most common posterior segment complication, especially in patients above 50 years old and three months post-COVID-19.

Keywords

Conjunctivitis, Coronavirus disease-2019 retinopathy, Orbital mucormycosis, Persistent headaches, Posterior segment complication, Refractive errors

The COVID-19 pandemic, which began in Wuhan City, China, in December 2019, soon spread across the globe (1),(2). Over time, there have been small strides made in understanding the disease, its management, and vaccination (3),(4). Although COVID-19 cases have declined tremendously, there are still instances of post-COVID-19 complications involving multiple organ systems, including the eyes. There has been a subsequent rise in cases of orbital mucormycosis (5), viral conjunctivitis (6), and presentations of decreased vision in post-COVID-19 patients. Additionally, vision-threatening neuro-ophthalmic disorders, higher ocular surface disease index scores, and lower Schirmer test results (7) have been noted in patients following hospitalisation for COVID-19. Exposure keratitis has also been found in patients admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) units (8).

In the current scenario, almost four years have passed since the occurrence of the first case of COVID-19 in Wuhan city. The authors are now seeing post-COVID-19 vaccine uveitis, simultaneous onset of Graves’ disease and ocular myasthenia gravis, along with dry eye syndromes and orbital mucormycosis [9,10]. Greenhalgh T et al., recently coined a new entity called Post-COVID-19 Syndrome, which is defined as extending beyond three weeks from the onset of the first COVID-19 symptom, and Chronic COVID-19 as symptoms extending beyond 12 weeks (11). There are only case reports and a few studies from different parts of the world, such as Egypt, China, Syria, Malaysia, Poland, and Saudi Arabia, which have documented acute COVID-19 and post-ocular symptoms and isolated post-COVID-19 manifestations pertaining to parts of the eye, such as nerve palsy, retina, ocular surface, and refractive errors (12),(13),(14),(15),(16),(17). There are only a few case series and studies from India which have documented post-COVID-19 ocular manifestations (8),(18). However, in all the available literature (8),(12),(13),(14),(15),(16),(17),(18), there is no exact and comprehensive documentation of ocular diseases persisting after post-COVID-19, and various ocular ailments resulting from acquiring various treatments for COVID-19, especially in South India. The present study aimed to address this gap.

Therefore, the present study aimed to analyse various ocular diseases reported after post-COVID-19 and study their association with the duration, age, gender, co-morbidities, hospitalisation, medication, oxygen intervention, and hypothesise a relevant possible explanation for the aetiopathogenesis of the ocular diseases pertaining to post-COVID-19.

Material and Methods

This was a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted on post-COVID-19 patients who were affected by COVID-19 not more than three months prior in the Department of Ophthalmology at All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Mangalagiri, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India. Approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee board was obtained before conducting the study (IEC no- AIIMS/MG/IEC/2022-23/147). Strict ethical guidelines indicated in the Declaration of Helsinki were followed in the present study, and the present study did not involve any financial issues. Verbal consent was obtained from the patients. The study was conducted over four months, from September 2021 to December 2021.

Inclusion criteria: The study population included patients presenting with ocular ailments, who were post-COVID-19 for not more than three months, of all age groups and both genders.

Exclusion criteria: Patients who were not post-COVID-19 and those who were post-COVID-19 during the first wave were excluded. The reason being the first COVID-19 wave occurred in India in March 2021, and the second COVID-19 wave occurred in February 2021, with a time lapse of more than six months between the onset of the two waves. The present study aimed to study ocular diseases presenting in post-COVID-19 patients within three months only, hence post-COVID-19 patients from the first wave were excluded from the present study.

Sample size calculation: Anticipating that 22% of the subjects would develop eye disease within three months of a COVID-19 infection (based on pilot data of patients attending the hospital with post-COVID-19 ocular complications), with 10% absolute precision and 5% level of significance, the sample size was calculated using the estimation of single proportion formula {n ≥ z1-α/2P(1-P)/d2, with Z at 5% level of significance-1.96, anticipated proportion (P)=0.22, 1-P=0.78, and absolute precision (d)=0.1}.

Study Procedure

This resulted in a sample size of 66. A total of 66 patients were enrolled during the study period after obtaining prior consent. The date of COVID-19 positivity and the date of onset of symptoms were noted. All ocular diseases of presenting patients were recorded, and their clinical demographic profile was documented through proper examination, and the results were analysed. Discrete variables such as gender, hospital admission, oxygen requirement, and continuous variables such as age, blood sugar levels, blood pressure, duration of post-COVID-19, etc., were recorded. The patients’ clinical history and symptoms were recorded. All the patients had their visual acuity recorded using Snellen charts, and intraocular pressure recorded using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. Detailed anterior segment examination was performed under a slit lamp. Fundus findings were recorded using a +90D lens, and further investigations were conducted wherever necessary.

Statistical Analysis

The continuous variables were summarised with mean and standard deviation or median with interquartile range based on the normality of the data. Normality was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Categorical variables were summarised with frequency and proportion. The association of gender and various age groups with ocular disease and other clinical parameters was assessed using the Chi-square/Fisher’s -exact test with SPSS software version 25. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

In the present study, out of 66 patients who presented with ocular diseases following post-COVID-19, males constituted 41 (62.1%) and females constituted 25 (37.9%), with a male-to-female ratio of 1.64:1. The age of the patients ranged between 20 to 60 years, and most of the patients 23 (34.8%) were above 50 years, as summarised in (Table/Fig 1). In the present study, most patients who had developed eye diseases following COVID-19 fell within one month of the COVID-19 attack 24 (36.4%), followed by within less than one month of the COVID-19 attack 20 (30.3%) (Table/Fig 1). Out of the 66 patients who presented with various eye diseases following post-COVID-19 of less than one month to three months duration, 11 were diabetics (16.7%), 8 patients were hypertensive (12.1%), and 40 patients (60.6%) had no associated co-morbidities (Table/Fig 1). A total of 53 patients (80.3%) had undergone home isolation during their COVID-19 time and had received supportive treatment, and 13 patients (19.7%) were hospitalised (Table/Fig 1).

Ocular diseases: The most common ocular disease was conjunctivitis (39 patients) following post-COVID-19. Eight patients had developed central serous chorioretinopathy, and four members developed refractive errors. Five patients developed persistent headaches, and two patients developed Orbital Mucormycosis. All the symptoms were more common in males (Table/Fig 2), except for retinopathy, which showed equal frequency in both genders. However, the higher incidences in the male gender were not statistically significant.

Association between ocular diseases and age distribution (Table/Fig 3): Conjunctivitis and COVID-19 retinopathy were more frequent in individuals over 50 years of age. However, this association was not statistically significant. Association between ocular diseases and the type of treatment received (details shown in (Table/Fig 4)): Refractive error was more frequent in individuals receiving steroids, and this association was statistically significant.

Association between ocular diseases and post-COVID-19 duration (Table/Fig 5): Conjunctivitis was more frequent in individuals who were one month post-COVID-19, and this association was statistically significant. COVID-19 retinopathy was more frequent in individuals who were 2-3 months post-COVID-19, and this association was statistically significant. Similarly, refractive error was more frequent in individuals who were less than one month post-COVID-19, and this association was statistically significant.

Association between ocular diseases and co-morbid diseases (Table/Fig 6): Proptosis and mucormycosis were more frequent in diabetics, and this association was statistically significant. Ophthalmoplegia and optic nerve involvement were seen in one patient each and were more common in patients with diabetes and hypertension, and hemiplegia patients, respectively.

Association between ocular diseases and the place of treatment (Table/Fig 7): The most common symptom in patients under home isolation during COVID-19 and presenting post-COVID-19 was conjunctivitis, followed by ocular headache and COVID-19 retinopathy. Meanwhile, the most common symptom in patients under hospital stay during COVID-19 and presenting post-COVID-19 was conjunctivitis, followed by COVID-19 retinopathy and refractive errors.

Discussion

In the present study, most patients who had developed eye diseases following COVID-19 disease presented one month after the COVID-19 attack or a lesser duration, constituting 24 (36.4%) and 20 (30.3%) patients, respectively. This is similar to the study done by Tohamy D et al., in which patients who developed eye diseases recovered from COVID-19 within one month (12). Very few patients developed eye disease following three months or more after the COVID-19 attack. The probable explanation can be the effect of coronavirus pathogenesis in ocular tissues, and the exaggeration of immunological activity may diminish along with the time since the COVID-19 attack. However, the exact reason is not yet known.

In the present study, anterior segment diseases like conjunctivitis (39 patients, 59.1%) and dry eyes (two patients, 3%) were more common in post-COVID-19 patients who did not have any co-morbidities (28 patients). Conjunctivitis was present in 30.7% with co-morbidities vs 79.3% without co-morbidities, and who had acquired mild COVID-19 infection and had undergone home isolation only, with supportive treatment alone (conjunctivitis (n=39)-82% with home isolation vs 18% with hospitalisation, dry eye (n=2) 100% with home isolation vs 0% hospitalisation). Posterior segment diseases like central serous chorioretinopathy, retinal haemorrhages, etc., were found in eight patients, and 37.5% of these had used steroids during their treatment.

In a study done by Costa IF et al., dry eye diseases were also reported in patients who had suffered from mild to moderate COVID-19 only (19). In a similar study done by Wan KH et al., the authors noticed an association between dry eye-related disease and post-COVID-19 status (13). They have documented an OR of 0.91 (95% CI 0.84- 0.98) for ocular surface symptoms like dry eye within four weeks following diagnosis in patients with a lower viral load.

In the present study, five patients who had persistent headaches were mild cases and had received supportive treatment in home isolation. The majority (3 patients) of them did not have any co-morbidities. The presence of headache in post-COVID-19 patients was also noted in the study by Costa IF et al., (19). Membrilla JA et al., also observed that headache occurred in patients who had mild COVID-19 in the acute stage (20). The probable reason could be the accumulation of SARS-COV-2 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) virus in the trigeminal nerve (nerve endings in the conjunctiva and cornea), which may trigger immune reactivity of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) in cerebral blood vessels and cerebral endothelium, leading to the activation of a cascade of inflammatory reactions and the release of glutamate, resulting in persistent headaches.

Ophthalmoplegia was present in one male patient who received supportive treatment, with one month of post-COVID-19 duration and had both diabetes and hypertension co-morbidities. A similar case of complete ophthalmoplegia in a diabetic patient who had received steroid treatment was reported by Hajjar D et al., (14). In the present study, the patient was on supportive treatment only. Only III and IV cranial nerves were involved, and very few cases of ophthalmoplegia are reported in the literature to date. The probable cause is that an immunological reaction could have been triggered in the patient who had both diabetes and hypertension co-morbidities and was already on supportive therapy.

In the present study, four patients (two male and two female) had developed Central Serous Chorioretinopathy (CSR). Three patients had taken steroids in their treatment and one had received an injection of Remdesivir. The majority (4) of them developed CSR after three months of the post-COVID-19 attack. Three of them were hypertensives, and one of them had diabetes. One patient was in home isolation, and three were hospitalised during the COVID-19 attack. The majority of them were above 50 years of age. A similar case had been reported by Sanjay S et al., in an Asian Indian female who developed CSR unilaterally after using steroids (21). Sharifi A et al., also reported a similar case of CSR in a 49-year-old female patient who was treated with injections of Remdesivir and Dexamethasone (22). Mohd-Alif WM et al., in their study reported bilateral CSCR in a patient who had received both intravenous and oral corticosteroids as treatment during COVID-19 infection (15). The exact aetiology and pathology of CSCR in post-COVID-19 patients are yet to be understood. However, three possible explanations for developing CSCR are as follows: 1) Use of steroids, as per treatment protocols, could have led to the development of Unilateral CSCR in the post-COVID-19 stage, after four weeks to two months; 2) SARS-COV-2 may lead to endotheliitis, escalating to hyperpermeability of the choriocapillaris, endothelial dysfunction, and retinal pigment epithelial pump dysfunction, finally leading to CSCR; 3) Psychological stress faced by the patients during the COVID-19 stage, and mostly hypertensive co-morbidity may have led to CSCR in the post-COVID-19 stage.

Four patients presented with cotton wool spots and retinal haemorrhages, which were similar to the Polish study done by Szkodny D et al., (7), but in the present study, two patients who presented with subtle haemorrhages and cotton wool spots were hypertensives. It is not clear whether cotton wool spots were due to hypertensive retinopathy or COVID-19. However, one patient with haemorrhages did not have any co-morbidity, and the other patient with few cotton wool spots had Hemiplegia as a co-morbid factor. These retinal findings may be attributed to the immunological effect caused by the coronavirus, but the exact mechanism is unclear to date.

In the present study, one female patient had Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus (HZO) after mild COVID-19 (less than one-month duration, under home isolation), and had been diabetic for the past 20 years. Pourazizi M et al., had reported a similar case of HZO in a 25-year-old female following moderate to severe COVID-19 (16). The probable explanation is that, as the patient was already immune-compromised due to long-standing diabetes, SARS-CoV-2 attack could have reactivated Herpes. Immune dysfunction of T cells and immune dysregulation following COVID-19 may be an acceptable pathogenesis, but a lot of research should be done to understand the exact mechanism.

In the present study, two patients had orbital mucormycosis. Both developed orbital mucormycosis within one month of acquiring COVID-19 infection, similar to the study by Ponce-Rosas L et al., (23). In our study, both patients had long-standing diabetes as a co-morbidity, similar to other studies on Rhino-orbital mucormycosis in post-COVID-19 patients, such as those by Arjun R et al., Ponce-Rosas L et al., Desai EJ et al., and Mobeen H et al., (18),(23),(24),(25). One patient had undergone hospitalisation and was administered Injection Remdesivir, similar to the study by Mobeen H et al., and one had received supportive treatment in home isolation (25). In these two patients, there was a decrease in vision, restriction of eye movements, and unilateral proptosis. One patient had undergone orbital exenteration, and the other patient recovered with Amphotericin. Both modalities of treatment were reported by Arjun R et al., and Desai EJ et al., (18),(24). The age of both patients affected by orbital mucormycosis in the present study was above 40 years, middle-aged, and old, which is similar to Ponce-Rosas L et al., (23). Long-standing diabetes and middle to older age of patients should have made the patients more vulnerable to getting orbital mucormycosis following post-COVID-19 sequelae. In the present study, none of the patients had taken steroids as part of COVID-19 treatment, which is in contrast to Mobeen H et al.’s study (25). In studies reported by Arjun R et al., few patients who had suffered from orbital mucormycosis didn’t receive steroids as part of their treatment but were long-standing diabetics, which is similar to the present study (18). The most common similarity in all the studies quoted above and the present study is that all the patients were diabetics, suffered from moderate COVID-19, and were middle-aged patients. Probably, immune compromise by diabetes, already attacked by COVID-19, and hospitalisation may reactivate the invasive fungus, leading to lethal orbital mucormycosis. However, the sample size in the present study was small (two patients out of 66), but the risk factors of acquiring orbital mucormycosis coincided with other studies. It can be concluded that long-standing diabetes is undoubtedly a major risk factor for developing orbital mucormycosis in post-COVID-19 patients.

In the present study, four patients developed refractive error following post-COVID-19 infection. Among them, all three were males. Two patients had received steroids, and one patient had both oxygen and steroids as part of the treatment protocol for COVID-19 disease, with a significant p-value of 0.002. The duration of acquiring refractive error post-COVID-19 was less than one month in two patients, similar to the Alrashidi study and with a significant p-value of 0.001 (17). All patients had no co-morbidities, with two in home isolation and two in hospitalisations. The probable explanation for developing refractive error post-COVID-19 in non refractive error patients is the development of abnormalities in the tonic mechanism of accommodation. However, much research has to be done in this area to have a better understanding of the mechanism.

Limitation(s)

The study is limited by the fact that the hypotheses made on disease pathogenesis were based solely on observations and cannot be proven without experimental or analytical studies to confirm or disapprove the hypotheses. Additionally, the study is limited by its sample size and requires studies with larger sample sizes.

Conclusion

This paper presents ophthalmic manifestations in post-COVID-19 patients thus approving the hypothesis. Conjunctivitis was the most common ocular disease, more common after one month of post-COVID-19. COVID-19 retinopathy was the most common posterior segment complication, more common in patients above 50 years and two to three months post-COVID-19. Around one-tenth of patients had persistent headache post-COVID-19. Ophthalmoplegia and central serous retinopathy were noted in a few patients who had received supportive treatment and presented with co-morbidities.

Acknowledgement

The authorwould like to thank the Department Senior Resident Doctors, Dr. Deepthi Slesser, and Dr. Divya Deepthi, who helped him in collecting data from the patients, and Community Medicine Senior Resident, Dr. Navya Krishna Naidu, who helped him in doing statistical analysis for the present study.

References

1.
Zhu H, Wei L, Niu P. The novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China. Glob Health Res Policy. 2020;5:6. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Ghosh P, Ghosh R, Chakraborty B. COVID-19 in India: Statewise Analysis and Prediction. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020;6(3):e20341. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Purohit N, Chugh Y, Bahuguna P, Prinja S. COVID-19 management: The vaccination drive in India. Health Policy Technol. 2022;11(2):100636. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Parri M. Clinical profile of patients attending ophthalmic clinic during peaks of COVID-19 pandemic: A descriptive study during peaks of COVID-19 pandemic at tertiary institute in south India. Indian J Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022;8(1):09-12. [crossref]
5.
Desai EJ, Pandya A, Upadhya I, Patel T, Banerjee S, Jain V. Epidemiology, clinical features and management of rhino orbital mucormycosis in Post-COVID-19 patients. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;74(1):103-07. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Brantl V, Schworm B, Weber G, Schiefelbein J, Kreutzer TC, Michalakis S, et al. Long-term ocular damage after recovery from COVID-19: Lack of evidence at three months. BMC Ophthalmol. 2021;21(1):421. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Szkodny D, Wyle? gala A, Chlasta-Twardzik E, Wyle? gala E. The ocular surface symptoms and tear film parameters during and after COVID-19 infection. J Clin Med. 2022;11(22):6697. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Bigyabati R, Victor R, Singh CD, Rajkumari B. Ocular manifestations in post- coronavirus disease-2019 patients in a tertiary care institute in North-East India: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Medical Society. 2022;36(3):106-11. [crossref]
9.
Jordan CA, Townend S, Allen N, Sims J, McGhee CNJ, Niederer RL. Navigating Coronavirus Disease 2019 vaccination and uveitis: Identifying the rates and risk of recurrent uveitis after coronavirus disease vaccination. Ophthalmology. 2023;130(5):501-08. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
De Giglio L, Sadun F, Roberti C, Polidori L, Gilardi M, Altavista MC, et al. Post- COVID-19 simultaneous onset of Graves’ disease and ocular myasthenia gravis in a patient with a complex ocular motility impairment. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2023;33(3):NP49-NP51. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Greenhalgh T, Knight M, A’Court C, Buxton M, Husain L. Management of post- acute COVID-19 in primary care. BMJ. 2020;370:m3026. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Tohamy D, Sharaf M, Abdelazeem K, Saleh MGA, Rateb MF, Soliman W, et al. Ocular manifestations of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome, upper Egypt early report. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021;14:1935-44. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Wan KH, Lui GCY, Poon KCF, Ng SSS, Young AL, Hui DSC, et al. Ocular surface disturbance in patients after acute COVID-19. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022;50(4):398-406. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Hajjar D, Sultan D, Khalaf A, Hesso H, Kayyali A. A case of total ophthalmoplegia associated with a COVID-19 infection: Case report. Oxf Med Case Reports. 2022;2022(5):omac050. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Mohd-Alif WM, Nur-Athirah A, Hanapi MS, Tuan Jaffar TN, Shatriah I. Bilateral and multiple central serous chorioretinopathy following COVID-19 infection: A case report and literature review. Cureus. 2022;14(3):e23246. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Pourazizi M, Dehghani S, Abtahi-Naeini B. [Translated article] Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus and COVID-19: A Post-COVID-19 complication or a coincidence? Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2022;113:TS16-17. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Alrashidi SH. Accommodative insufficiency in post-COVID-19 case with refractive error. Oman J Ophthalmol 2022;15(3):403-06.
18.
Arjun R, Felix V, Niyas VKM, Kumar MAS, Krishnan RB, Mohan V, et al. COVID- 19-associated rhino-orbital mucormycosis: A single-centre experience of 10 cases. QJM. 2022;114(11):831-34. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Costa ÍF, Bonifácio LP, Bellissimo-Rodrigues F, Rocha EM, Jorge R, Bollela VR, et al. Ocular findings among patients surviving COVID-19. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1108520. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Membrilla JA, Caronna E, Trigo-López J, González-Martínez A, Layos-Romero A, Pozo-Rosich P, et al. Persistent headache after COVID-19: Pathophysioloy, clinic and treatment. Neurology Perspectives. 2021;1:S31-36. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Sanjay S, Srinivasan P, Jayadev C, Mahendradas P, Gupta A, Kawali A, et al. Post COVID-19 ophthalmic manifestations in an Asian Indian male. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2021;29(4):656-61. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Sharifi A, Daneshtalab A, Zand A. Bilateral central serous chorioretinopathy after treatment of COVID-19 infection. Cureus. 2022;14(3):e23446. [crossref]
23.
Ponce-Rosas L, Gonzales-Zamora J, Diaz-Reyes N, Alarco-Cadillo O, Alave- Rosas J. Rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis in a post-COVID-19 patient from Peru. Case Rep Infect Dis. 2022;2022:2537186. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Desai EJ, Pandya A, Upadhya I, Patel T, Banerjee S, Jain V. Epidemiology, clinical features and management of rhino orbital mucormycosis in post covid-19 patients. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;74(1):103-07. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Mobeen H, Khan NU, Hassan M, Ali I, Jan Z, Hussain N, et al. Orbital mucormycosis - Post SARS-CoV-2 sequelae. Brain Hemorrhages. 2021;2(4):157-60.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/67584.19040

Date of Submission: Sep 17, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Oct 24, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jan 03, 2024
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 18, 2023
• Manual Googling: Dec 07, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jan 01, 2024 (5%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com