Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 49875

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : February | Volume : 18 | Issue : 2 | Page : LC05 - LC11 Full Version

A Cross-sectional Study on Awareness and Utilisation of Government Health Insurance Schemes among Patients at a Tertiary Level Hospital in Kolkata, India


Published: February 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/66294.19042
Poulomi Mukherjee, Adwitiya Das, Aditya Banerjee, Kaushik Mitra, Debasis Das

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 3. Student, Department of Community Medicine, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Burdwan Medical College, Burdwan, West Bengal, India. 5. Professor and Head, Department of Community Medicine, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence Address :
Kaushik Mitra,
Flat K-3, Cluster - Eight, Purbachal, Salt Lake, Kolkata-700097, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: drkmitra@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the presence of multiple Government Health Insurance (GHI) schemes in West Bengal, the National Family Health Survey report (NFHS-5) has indicated that only 29.3% of households are covered by a health scheme. Awareness of health insurance schemes increases their utilisation. The absence of health insurance coverage results in increased out-of-pocket health expenditures, pushing families into debt. Therefore, there is a need to determine whether this lack of awareness among patients contributes to the issue.

Aim: To estimate the awareness level, enrollment in GHI schemes, experiences of their utilisation, and to determine the contributory factors of awareness and enrollment among patients attending the Outdoor Patient Departments (OPDs) at a tertiary care hospital in Kolkata.

Materials and Methods: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted from April 2023 to June 2023 at Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. A total of 390 respondents were chosen using a systematic random sampling technique and were interviewed using a predesigned, pretested, and semistructured questionnaire. Data were analysed using R Studio version 4.3.0. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Awareness about Swasthya Sathi was found to be present in 318 (81.54%) patients, but only 109 (34.28%) of them were enrolled. Awareness of Sishu Saathi and Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram (RBSK) was 12 (3.08%) and 10 (2.57%), respectively, and none were enrolled. The major source of information (11.03%) regarding health insurance among respondents was informal sources such as friends, relatives, and neighbours. The age of the respondents, type of family, occupation, and economic status were found to have a significant association with the right awareness (p=0.008, 0.012, 0.0005, and 0.029, respectively). The patient satisfaction level after utilising Swasthya Sathi was found to have a significant positive correlation with the right awareness (Spearman’s ρ=0.322, p-value <0.01). The determinants of enrollment in Swasthya Sathi were female gender, rural residence, and right awareness (p<0.001). The commonest reason for not enrolling in any GHI among the non subscribers was a lack of awareness (82.56%).

Conclusion: Correct awareness was found to be a determinant of enrollment in GHI. In order to bridge the gap between awareness and utilisation of GHI, there is a need to focus on Information, Education, and Communication (IEC) activities involving mass media and frontline health workers.

Keywords

Health expenditures, Out-of-pocket, Patient satisfaction, Swasthya sathi

Health insurance is defined as coverage that provides for the reimbursement of payments incurred because of sickness or injury. It includes insurance for losses from accidents, medical expenses, disability, or accidental death and dismemberment (1). The benefit is administered by a central organisation, such as a government agency, private organisation, or non profit entity. Accident insurance was first offered in 1850 in the United States (US), which gradually evolved into the present-day concept of health insurance by the early 20th century (2). In India, government-sponsored health insurance was first introduced as a part of the Employees’ State Insurance (ESI) Act in the year 1948 (3). Subsequently, many public GHI schemes were introduced in the country targeting several groups. However, with a population approaching 1.425 billion, health insurance penetration in India is one of the lowest, with only 41% of households reported to be covered by a health scheme according to the NFHS-5 report (2),(4),(5).

According to the World Bank, out-of-pocket health expenditures in India were 50.59% in 2020 (6). This can have a disastrous effect on the country’s economy, leading to an increased incidence of health expenditure-induced poverty. A survey conducted by the National Sample Survey Organisation in 1999 found that every year an additional 37 million Indians were pushed below the poverty line due to healthcare expenses, amounting to an almost 12% increase in poverty (7). A field research done in 2002 pointed out that health-related expenses were one of the top three reasons for the decline into poverty (8).

In view of the escalating cost of healthcare and high out-of-pocket health expenditures, the Government of India has initiated several GHI schemes in recent past. Notable among them are RBSK, launched in February 2013, and Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY) under Ayushman Bharat, launched in September 2018 (9),(10). The West Bengal Government launched Sishu Saathi on 21st August 2013 to provide free cardiac surgery for children from birth to 18 years (11). Swasthya Sathi was flagged off on 30th December 2016 to provide basic health cover for secondary and tertiary care up to five lakh rupees per annum per family (12). However, according to the NFHS-5 report, the proportion of households covered by a health scheme has declined from 33.4% to 29.3% in the state (13). The paucity of data in West Bengal warrants the identification of factors responsible for awareness of people about GHI and utilisation of its services. In this context, the present study was conducted with an aim to estimate the awareness and utilisation of GHI schemes among patients attending a tertiary care centre in Kolkata.

Material and Methods

An observational cross-sectional study was conducted from April 2023 to June 2023 at Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (MCH/KOL/IEC/NON-SPON/1878/05/2023 dated 10/05/2023). The present study was conducted for purely academic interest. Participation was voluntary, anonymous, and without financial benefits for shared time. Informed written consent was taken from all participants before the interview. Confidentiality and anonymity were maintained. Patients unaware of the GHI benefits were made aware and guided for any query.

Sample size calculation: Considering an awareness level of 64% as reported in a previous community-based study among the South Indian population (14), α of 0.05%, and an absolute precision of 5%, the minimum sample size was calculated as 354 using the equation 4PQ/D2. Considering 10% non response, the sample size was corrected to 389 and then rounded off to 390, and the respondents were chosen by systematic random sampling method.

Inclusion criteria: Patients and parents accompanying minor patients aged between 18 to 80 years attending emergency, medicine, surgery, paediatrics, orthopaedics, gynaecology and obstetrics outpatient department of the hospital were included.

Exclusion criteria: Patients who were severely ill and unable to respond or were not willing to furnish personal information or consent were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

A predesigned pretested and semistructured questionnaire was used pertaining to awareness and utilisation of GHI schemes among patients. The questionnaire was developed in English and later forward translation to Bengali and backward translation to English was done by two independent bilingual translators. The questionnaire was pilot tested on 40 patients for validation, and reliability was good (Cronbach alpha 0.68).

The questionnaire consisted of three sections: socio-demographic characteristics, awareness, and utilisation of GHI [Annexure-1]. Socio-demographic characteristics included age, gender, religion, caste, residence, type of family, educational status, occupation, and economic status of the respondents. Awareness regarding three GHI schemes, namely Swasthya Sathi, Sishu Sathi, and RBSK, had a total of 15 items, out of which nine questions were about Swasthya Sathi. The first question was whether they have heard about Swasthya Sathi, and the rest 8 questions were about the right awareness regarding the scheme. Six questions were about Sishu Sathi and RBSK schemes.

Total six items in the awareness section were in a three-point Likert scale as yes, no, and don’t know. A ‘yes’ response received a score of 1, while a ‘no’ or ‘do not know’ response received a score of 0. Three items assessed their awareness in a true/false response, and six items assessed the respondent’s awareness in verbatim. A correct response received a score of 1, and a wrong response received a score of 0. The sum of the awareness scores was used to compute the participant’s right awareness. The maximum score for the awareness section was 15. The median value of the respondent’s awareness was 5. A score less than 5 was considered poor awareness, while a score of 5 or higher indicated good awareness.

The utilisation section consisted of a total of 13 items. Eleven items were related to the status of enrollment in GHI, reasons for non subscription to GHI, the name of the scheme enrolled, source of awareness, experiences during utilising services like any guidance received within the hospital from the registration desk, any delay to complete preauthorisation request, admission, discharge, and out-of-pocket health expenditures incurred. Two items tested the satisfaction of the beneficiary after utilising GHI schemes on a 5-component Likert scale, namely ‘Very satisfied’, ‘Satisfied’, 6‘Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied’, ‘Dissatisfied’, ‘Very dissatisfied’ and received the scores from 5 to 1.

Other parameters studied were the correlation of patient satisfaction with the right awareness about Swasthya Sathi and determinants of enrollment in Swasthya Sathi.

Outcome definitions:

• Awareness about GHI-knowledge of the respondent on the presence of GHI schemes, its principles, and significance (15).
• Enrollment in GHI-the process through which an approved applicant is signed up with the health insurance scheme, and coverage is made effective (16).
• Utilisation of GHI-utilisation of healthcare services in case of healthcare need in the past by any GHI schemes (17).

Statistical Analysis

Data were analysed using R studio version 4.3.0. Missing data were excluded from the analysis. Frequencies and percentages were calculated for categorical variables, and the median and Interquartile Range (IQR) were calculated for ordinal variables with a non parametric distribution like scores on awareness and satisfaction of the beneficiaries. The Chi-square (χ2) test was used to find out the association between awareness and socio-demographic variables. Spearman’s correlation test was done to find out the correlation between right awareness and satisfaction of the beneficiaries after the utilisation of Swasthya Sathi. Multivariate logistic regression was carried out to find out the determinants of GHI (Swasthya Sathi) possession. All statistical evaluations carried out were two-sided, and the cut-off for statistical significance was taken as p<0.05.

Results

Of the total 390 respondents, the majority of them were in the age group of 30-39 years (34.62%), females (67.18%), residents of rural areas (73.33%), and stayed in nuclear families (55.64%). About 31.8% of respondents had completed their education until middle school, and 18.72% were illiterates. The majority of them were unemployed (61.03%) and were above the poverty line (75.38%) (Table/Fig 1).

The majority, 318 (81.54%), were aware of Swasthya Sathi, whereas very few had heard about Sishu Sathi 12 (3.08%) and RBSK 10 (2.57%) (Table/Fig 2).

Regarding the awareness of the various key functionalities of Swasthya Sathi among respondents who had heard of it, the majority of them could respond correctly regarding the entire contribution of the premium by the state government, smart card-enabled transactions, cashless treatment facility, and coverage of expenses incurred for diagnostic tests and surgeries. However, only 1.26% of respondents could answer correctly regarding who the members in the family included in Swasthya Sathi are (Table/Fig 3).

Among the 12 respondents who had heard the name of the Sishu Sathi scheme, none could answer correctly regarding the age group covered under the scheme, and 8 persons (66.67%) could tell correctly that the scheme provides free treatment to children who need heart surgeries. Among the 10 respondents who had heard the name of RBSK, only 4 persons (40%) could correctly answer that the scheme covers children from birth to 18 years of age, but none were aware of the conditions, namely defects at birth, diseases, deficiencies, and development delays for which the scheme provides free treatment and management.

The majority of respondents, 206 {n2 (52.82%)}, had an awareness level equal to or above the median (5), and 184 {n3 (47.18%)} respondents had an awareness level below it (Table/Fig 4).

The age of the respondents, type of family, occupation, and economic status were found to have a significant association with the right awareness about GHI with p=0.008, 0.012, 0.0005, and 0.029, respectively. Poor awareness was noted to be more among respondents belonging to the age group of 40-49 and 50-59 years, nuclear families, and unskilled workers (Table/Fig 4). However, when these factors were put in the logistic regression model, the age and occupation of the respondents didn’t show any significant difference between individual categories.

Of the 318 people (n1) aware of GHI schemes, 109 (34.28%) respondents had enrolled, and all of them had procured Swasthya Sathi. (Table/Fig 5) shows 11.03% of respondents had got the information regarding the scheme from friends, relatives, neighbors, locality, insurance agents. Mass media was noted to have contributed to awareness in only 1.54% of respondents.

The experiences of beneficiaries after utilising services under the Swasthya Sathi scheme are shown in (Table/Fig 6), which depicts that only 24.77% received any guidance from the registration desk of the hospital during treatment. Time delays in the approval of preauthorisation requests, admission, and discharge of patients from the hospital were reported only by a minority. A total of 33.03% of beneficiaries informed that they incurred out-of-pocket health expenditures for buying medicines, equipment, or diagnostic tests.

The majority of the beneficiaries were either satisfied (43.12%) or very satisfied (33.94%) with the Swasthya Sathi scheme. The median and IQR score of the patient satisfaction level regarding Swasthya Sathi was 4 (1).

(Table/Fig 7) shows that the patient satisfaction level after utilising healthcare services under Swasthya Sathi had a significant positive correlation with the right awareness regarding the scheme (Spearman’s rho correlation coefficient=0.322, p-value <0.01).

The commonest reason for not subscribing to any GHI was a lack of knowledge (82.56%) regarding the scheme or enrollment process (Table/Fig 8).

To determine the predictors of enrollment in the Swasthya Sathi scheme, a multivariate logistic regression was done. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated that the data fitted the model well (χ2 (8) 14.840, p>0.05); it explained 40.55% of the variance in subscription to GHI schemes (Nagelkerke R2) and correctly predicted 79.4% of cases. (Table/Fig 9) shows that enrollment in Swasthya Sathi had a significant association with female gender (p<0.001), rural residence (p<0.001), and increasing right awareness about the scheme (p<0.001). A significant difference was obtained when the age group of 20-29 years was compared to other age categories (up to 59 years); however, age was not significant as a whole (p=0.1).

Discussion

The present study attempted to assess individuals’ awareness, enrollment, experiences of utilisation, and to know the determinants of awareness and enrollment in the area of GHI in West Bengal, especially in reference to Swasthya Sathi, Sishu Saathi, and RBSK. Though the majority of the study participants (81.54%) were aware of Swasthya Sathi, they had not heard about Sishu Sathi or RBSK. Among 318 respondents who were aware of Swasthya Sathi, only 34.28% had enrolled in it. The majority of the beneficiaries were satisfied with Swasthya Sathi after utilising the services; however, issues of out-of-pocket payments (33.03%) and inadequate support provided by helpdesks in hospitals (24.77%) were identified. Older age of the respondents, nuclear family, unskilled workers were found to have a significant association with poor awareness about GHI. The main barrier to enrollment in any GHI among the study population was a lack of awareness (82.56%), and the determinants of enrollment in GHI were female gender, rural residence, and right awareness.

Health insurance literacy enables individuals to find and evaluate information about health plans, select the best plan according to their financial and health circumstances, and subsequently use the plan once enrolled by their knowledge, ability, and confidence (18). Knowledge about health insurance can boost individuals’ confidence and self-efficacy; thus, it is an important priority factor that is required to get enrolled in a health insurance scheme (19). In many low-income and middle-income countries, health insurance literacy is poor (15).

In the present study, 81.54% of the respondents were aware of Swasthya Sathi, which confirms the findings of a previous study conducted in the rural population of South India (20). However, this was lesser compared to the study done by Luke S and Vincent J with an 89.7% awareness level in a tertiary care centre of South India (21), but better than the study done by Reshmi B et al., (64%), Indumathi K et al., (75.7%), Surender R et al., (53.8%) (14),(22),(23). The majority of the respondents had the right awareness regarding the key functionalities and benefits of the Swasthya Sathi scheme, except for awareness of the fact that pre-existing diseases are covered (39.3%), monetary coverage per year per family (40.3%), and no cap on family size covered under the scheme (1.26%). However, awareness about Sishu Saathi and RBSK was poor (3.08% and 2.57%, respectively). Right awareness regarding the age group covered under Sishu Saathi and the conditions for which RBSK offers screening was reported by none.

Previous studies conducted in other countries have shown that multiple factors like individual (age, gender, education, employment status, marital status) (24),(25),(26) and household characteristics (wealth, size of family) are responsible for awareness and enrollment in health insurance schemes (18),(25),(27). In India, studies done in rural and urban populations have found religion, education, occupation, family income per month, socio-economic status, type of family as determinants of awareness of health insurance (14),(22),(23). In the present study, the age of the respondents, type of family, occupation, and economic status were found to have a significant association with the right awareness about GHI. The probable explanation might be that aged people, those belonging to nuclear families, and unskilled workers had poor access to information regarding existing GHI schemes in the state.

Among 318 (81.54%) of respondents who were aware of GHI, only 34.28% had enrolled in the Swasthya Sathi scheme. However, this was less compared to the study done by Indumathi K et al., (66.9%) but better than the study done by Surender R et al., (17.5%) (22),(23). This gap between awareness and enrollment status could be due to the fact that the right awareness of respondents regarding existing GHI was average. Individuals usually enroll in health insurance because of their personal experiences or word-of-mouth advertisements (27). Mass media such as newspapers, radio, and television play an important role in making people aware of health insurance schemes. Friends, community, and health workers contribute to increasing the health insurance awareness of the people (18). In the present study, most of the subscribers (39.45%) had received information regarding the scheme from informal sources (friends, relatives, neighbours). Results of studies carried out elsewhere were also in agreement with this finding (14),(22). However, mass media was the major source of information, as reported by Choudhary ML et al., but it was noted to have contributed to awareness in only 5.50% of beneficiaries in this study (28). The information regarding health insurance is spread in rural areas through Panchayat offices where the cards are issued to the people; we found awareness through Panchayat/Block development office to be 24.77% among subscribers.

Capturing beneficiaries’ experience of utilising healthcare services at the public and private hospitals empaneled in the Swasthya Sathi scheme is vital in providing insights into the responsiveness of Swasthya Sathi in terms of prompt service delivery, financial burden faced by the beneficiaries in terms of out-of-pocket payments, and patient satisfaction with the experience of hospitalisation. The time delay as experienced by the proportion of beneficiaries in the present study at different stages of hospitalisation was highest for preauthorisation approval (8.26%). After reaching a hospital, the insurance helpdesk is supposed to act as a major source of information about the scheme and provide support to the beneficiaries in the hospitalisation process and avoid unnecessary delays (29). In terms of the information and support provided by the helpdesk, only 24.77% of beneficiaries reported to have received help. Moreover, 33.03% of beneficiaries informed that they had made out-of-pocket payments separate from the cashless payment of the scheme. In a previous study conducted in India exploring the experience of Pradhan Mantri Jan Aarogya Yojana (PM-JAY) beneficiaries, 52% reported receiving information about PM-JAY, help with documents and computerised registration, and guidance about treatment within the hospital. 26% of respondents reported that they made out-of-pocket health expenditures before, during, or after hospitalisation (29). In the present study, the majority of the beneficiaries were satisfied with the Swasthya Sathi scheme, which is similar to that reported for PM-JAY in Gujarat (82%) and Madhya Pradesh (71%) (29).

The primary barrier to enrolling in any GHI among those who had not subscribed to any GHI was lack of awareness (82.56%) about the concept, availability of health insurance, or the formalities to subscribe. This is comparable to the findings of a previous study (21). This implies that a high number of patients are receiving treatment without the cover of GHI and are making out-of-pocket health expenditures.

The determinants of enrollment in GHI were female gender, rural residence, and correct awareness. This could be due to the preponderance of females among the respondents and the wider popularity of GHI among the rural population compared to urban areas, where people can afford to pay for the premium of private health insurances. The present study confirms the findings of previous studies that awareness of health insurance schemes increases their utilisation and subsequently facilitates healthcare uptake (18),(19),(24).

Limitation(s)

As this was a tertiary healthcare institute-based study, patients attended OPDs from all districts of West Bengal, as well as neighbouring states and countries like Bihar, Odisha, and Bangladesh. GHI schemes unique to West Bengal, such as Swasthya Sathi and Sishu Saathi, might not be relevant to many respondents, which might have affected the results in terms of awareness level. Moreover, as all OPD services are free of cost at any government hospital in West Bengal, some patients might have been confused regarding responding to questions about utilisation. Also, there could be conscious falsification of responses to questions regarding enrollment or utilisation of various GHI, which may have introduced some bias. Despite sincere efforts, the crowded OPD setting might have made respondents feel a lack of privacy, which might have influenced their responses.

Conclusion

The present study showed that even though the majority of the respondents had heard about the Swasthya Sathi scheme, they were not utilising it mainly due to a lack of correct awareness. Correct awareness had a significant association with enrollment and patient satisfaction after utilising Swasthya Sathi. Therefore, in order to bridge the gap between awareness and utilisation of GHI, effective IEC activities are needed, focussing on the involvement of mass media, frontline healthcare workers, wide display of GHI schemes through appropriate use of signage in government health facilities, and strengthening the functioning of the helpdesk in hospitals to ensure prompt service delivery of GHI schemes.

References

1.
Claxton G, Kaiser. How private insurance works: A primer. Washington, DC: Kaiser Commission On Medicaid And The Uninsured; 2002.
2.
Wikipedia Contributors. Health insurance [Internet]. Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation; 2019. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_insurance.
3.
The Evolution of Health Insurance in India- ACCESS [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jun 1]. Available from: https://accessh.org/evolution-health-insurance-india/.
4.
Nations U. India to overtake China as world’s most populous country in April 2023, United Nations projects [Internet]. United Nations. 2023. Available from: https://www.un.org/en/desa/india-overtake-china-world-most-populous-country-april-2023-united-nations-projects#:~:text=24%20April%202023%20%2D%20China%20will.
5.
Government of India. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5)2019-21. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; 2021.
6.
World Bank Open Data [Internet]. World Bank Open Data. [cited 2023 Jun 1]. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.OOPC.CH.ZS?end=2020&locations=IN&start=2000&view=chart.
7.
India National Sample Survey Organisation. Consumer expenditure survey, 55th round, 1999-2000. New Delhi: Ministry of Statistics, Government of India, 2001.
8.
Krishna A. Escaping poverty and becoming poor: Who gains, who loses, and why? World Development. 2004:32(1):121-36. [crossref]
9.
Rashtriya Bal SwasthyaKaryakram [Internet]. pib.gov.in. [cited 2023 Jun 1]. Available from: https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=106931#:~:text=RashtriyaBalSwasthyaKaryakram%20(RBSK)%20was%20launched%20in.
10.
National health authority about Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PM-JAY). Available from: https://nha.gov.in/PM-JAY [cited 2023 Jun 1].
11.
Sishusaathi- Egiye Bangla [Internet]. Wb.gov.in. 2013. Available from: https:// wb.gov.in/government-schemes-details-sishusaathi.aspx.
12.
Swasthya Sathi.gov.in [Internet]. swasthyasathi.gov.in. Available from: https:// swasthyasathi.gov.in/AboutScheme.
13.
Bengal W. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare State Fact Sheet [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jun 10]. Available from: https://www.im4change.org/docs/West%20Bengal%20NFHS-5%20Factsheet.pdf.
14.
Reshmi B, Nair S, Sabu K, Unnikrishnan B. Awareness of health insurance in a south Indian population-A community-based study. Health and Population; Perspectives and Issues. 2007;30(3):177-88.
15.
Reshmi B, Unnikrishnan B, Parsekar SS, Rajwar E, Vijayamma R, Venkatesh BT. Health insurance awareness and its uptake in India: A systematic review protocol. BMJ Open. 2021;11(4):e043122. Doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043122. PMID: 33858867. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
eHealth. Health Insurance Glossary. [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jun 20]. Available from: https://www.ehealthinsurance.com/health-insurance-glossary/terms-e/#:~:text=Enrolment%3A,in%20a%20health%20insurance%20plan.
17.
Kusuma YS, Pal M, Babu BV. Health insurance: Awareness, utilisation, and its determinants among the urban poor in Delhi, India. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2018;8(1-2):69-76. Doi: 10.2991/j.jegh.2018.09.004. PMID: 30859791. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Basaza R, Kyasiimire EP, Namyalo PK, Kawooya A, Nnamulondo P, Alier KP. Willingness to pay for Community Health Insurance among taxi drivers in Kampala City, Uganda: A contingent evaluation. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2019;12:133-43. Doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S184872. PMID: 31410075. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Ghaddar S, Byun J, Krishnaswami J. Health insurance literacy and awareness of the affordable care act in a vulnerable hispanic population. Patient Educ Couns. patient ed. 2018;101(12):2233-40. Doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.033. PMID: 30220598. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Gowda S, Manjunath C, Krishna D. Awareness about health insurance in rural population of South India. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2015;2:648-50. Doi: 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20151064. [crossref]
21.
Luke S, Vincent J. Awareness and utilisation of health insurance among patients of a tertiary care centre in South India. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2020;7(10):4033-36. Doi: 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20204372. [crossref]
22.
Indumathi K, Ishaq HS, Gopi A, Subramanian M. Awareness of health insurance in a rural population of Bangalore, India. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2016;5(10):2162-67. Doi: 10.5455/ijmsph.2016.15042016476. [crossref]
23.
Surendar R, Arthi M, Madhumadhi S, Saravanan R, Karrunya S, Srikanth S. Awareness on health insurance among a selected urban population in Puducherry. Nat J Res Community Med. 2019;8(2):176-79. [crossref]
24.
Mirach TH, Demissie GD, Biks GA. Determinants of community-based health insurance implementation in West Gojjam zone, Northwest Ethiopia: A community based cross sectional study design. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):544. Doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4363-z. PMID: 31375108. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Kanmiki EW, Bawah AA, Akazili J, Agorinyah I, Awoonor-Williams JK, Phillips JF, et al. Unawareness of health insurance expiration status among women of reproductive age in northern Ghana: Implications for achieving universal health coverage. J Health Popul Nutr. 2019;38(1):34. Doi: 10.1186/s41043-019-0190-4. PMID: 31775904. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Seddoh A, Sataru F. Mundane? Demographic characteristics as predictors of enrolment onto the National health insurance scheme in two districts of Ghana. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):330. Doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3155-1. PMID: 29728110.[crossref][PubMed]
27.
Michael GC, Aliyu I, Grema BA, Suleiman AK. Perception of factors influencing primary health-care facility choice among National health insurance enrollees of a northwest Nigerian Hospital. J Patient Exp. 2019;6(3):247-52. Doi: 10.1177/ 2374373518790072. PMID: 31535014. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Choudhary ML, Goswami KI, Khambati SN, Shah VR, Makwana NR, Yadav SB. Awareness of Health insurance and its related issues in rural areas of Jamnagar district. Natl J Community Med. 2013;4(2):267-71.
29.
Trivedi M, Saxena A, Shroff Z, Sharma M. Experiences and challenges in accessing hospitalisation in a government-funded health insurance scheme: Evidence from early implementation of Pradhan Mantri Jan Aarogya Yojana (PM-JAY) in India. PLOS ONE. 2022;17(5):e0266798. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266798. PMID: 35552557.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/66294.19042

Date of Submission: Jun 28, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Sep 19, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Dec 16, 2023
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 01, 2023
• Manual Googling: Sep 21, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Dec 13, 2023 (14%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com