Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 51494

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : February | Volume : 18 | Issue : 2 | Page : EC34 - EC37 Full Version

Seroprevalence of Transfusion Transmitted Infections among Blood Donors at the Tertiary Care Hospital in Nadiad, Gujarat, India


Published: February 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/62976.19105
Nilam Hardik Patel, Jyoti Prakash Sapre, Kirti Nishant Vyas, Hitesha Nanjibhai Radadia

1. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Dr. N. D. Desai Faculty of Medical Science and Research, Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadiad, Gujarat, India. 2. Professor, Department of Pathology, Dr. N. D. Desai Faculty of Medical Science and Research, Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadiad, Gujarat, India. 3. Professor, Department of Pathology, Dr. N. D. Desai Faculty of Medical Science and Research, Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadiad, Gujarat, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Dr. N. D. Desai Faculty of Medical Science and Research, Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadiad, Gujarat, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Nilam Hardik Patel,
A1/3, MPUH Doctor Staff Quaters, Civil Road, Nadiad-387001, Gujarat, India.
E-mail: nilamhardik88@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Blood transfusion is an effective treatment for saving millions of lives, even though transfusion-transmissible infections are a major problem. An integrated approach for blood safety is required, which includes the collection of blood only from voluntary, non-remunerated blood donors.

Aim: To assess the seroprevalence of Transfusion-Transmissible Infections (TTIs) among blood donors in a tertiary care center in Nadiad, India.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted from August 2019 to September 2022 at the blood bank of a tertiary care center in Nadiad, India. Data were collected in an Excel datasheet pertaining to all donors who were screened for Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg), Hepatitis C virus (HCV), Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), syphilis, and malaria and analysed. The associations between categorical variables were tested using the Chi-square test.

Results: A total of 6103 voluntary and replacement donors were screened, out of which 5855 (95.93%) were males and 248 (4.06%) were females. The prevalence rate was highest for syphilis 81 (1.32%), then Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) 32 (0.52%), HCV 09 (0.14%), HIV 05 (0.08%), and malaria 00 (0%) in decreasing order. Out of 6103 donors, 127 donors showed seropositivity for TTI (2.08%). The present study shows seropositivity for TTI only in male replacement donors (100%).

Conclusion: Blood is still one of the main sources of transmission of infections such as HIV, HBsAg, HCV, syphilis, and malaria. The present study showed a higher prevalence of syphilis than HBsAg, HCV, HIV, and malaria, in decreasing order. The study showed seroprevalence only in male replacement donors, so efforts to motivate and ensure the active participation of voluntary blood donors, including females, are needed. Meticulous donor screening, the use of highly sensitive techniques for the detection of TTIs, and improved post-donation counseling are highly recommended to ensure the safety of blood for recipients.

Keywords

Blood donation, Hepatitis B, Transfusion-transmissible infections

Blood Transfusion Services (BTS) are an important part of the modern healthcare system, without which efficient medical care is impossible. The aim of BTS is to provide effective blood and blood products that are safe and adequate to meet a patient’s needs (1). However, blood transfusions are associated with certain risks that can cause adverse consequences. They may cause acute complications such as haemolysis, febrile reactions, allergy, anaphylactic reactions, and delayed complications like haemolysis, carrying the risk of transmitting infections (2).

There is a 1% chance of transfusion-associated problems, including transfusion-transmitted diseases, with every one unit of blood transfused (3). According to the Global progress report on HIV, viral hepatitis, and sexually transmitted infections, 2021, 1.5 million (1.0 million-2.0 million) people acquired HIV infection in 2020, hepatitis B and C caused 1.1 million deaths and 3.0 million new infections per year, and 7.1 million (2.4 million-11.5 million) people were newly infected with Treponema pallidum (T. pallidum) in 2020 (4).

An integrated policy for blood safety is required for the elimination of TTIs. The main part of this strategy includes the collection of blood only from voluntary, non-remunerated blood donors, screening for all TTIs, and reduction of unnecessary transfusion. According to the National AIDS Control Organisation (NACO) guidelines, all blood samples must be tested for HIV 1 and 2, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, syphilis, and malaria (5).

Preventing the transmission of infectious diseases through blood transfusion in developing countries is difficult due to limited resources. Despite effective strategies and plans, disease transmission still occurs due to the high cost of screening, lack of trained staff, laboratory testing errors, and the inability of the test to detect the disease in the window period of infection. Therefore, the current study aimed to determine the prevalence of transfusion-transmitted infections in voluntary and replacement donors at a tertiary care hospital-based blood bank in Nadiad.

Material and Methods

It was a retrospective study conducted in the blood bank of a newly established Medical College in Nadiad, India, from August 2019 to September 2022.

Study population: All blood donors, whether voluntary or replacement, during the study period.

Inclusion criteria: Blood donors aged between 18 and 60 years, with a hemoglobin concentration of 12.5 g% or more, a body weight of 45 kg or more, no history of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, HIV, or sexually transmitted diseases, and no history of jaundice in the past year.

Exclusion criteria: Repeat donors and donors whose blood was not tested due to haemolysis or other reasons for TTIs were excluded from the study.

Data collection procedure: The data were collected by studying all the registration books of blood donors from August 2019 to September 2022 maintained in the blood bank. Data of all blood donors, both voluntary and replacement, were noted.

Blood was collected by conducting blood donation camps in Nadiad and adjoining areas and through in-house replacement donation, mainly from friends and relatives of patients of this hospital and other healthcare institutions. Blood donors were requested to fill in the donor form of the blood bank prepared by the Departmental head. Information regarding age, sex, previous history of surgery, chronic illness, hospitalisation, blood transfusion, jaundice, high-risk behaviour, history of vaccination, etc., was recorded. After satisfaction with the answers from donors and medical examination, donors were allowed to donate blood.

Method of testing for TTIs: The method of testing for TTIs involved taking Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA) and serum samples from each donor, and then separating the serum. The serum of all donors was tested for HBsAg, HCV antibodies (anti-HCV), HIV p24 antigen, antibodies 1, 2 (anti-HIV-1,2), Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) for syphilis antibodies, and malaria parasite antigen.

HBsAg testing was performed using the Hepalisa Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) kit for the detection of HBsAg. The anti-HCV test was conducted using the Microlisa ELISA kit for the detection of antibodies to HCV. HIV screening was carried out using the Microlisa 4th generation ELISA test for the detection of HIV-1 p24 antigen and Antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2, known for its 100% sensitivity and 99.95% specificity. These in vitro diagnostic reagents were manufactured by J.Mitra and Co. Pvt., Ltd.

Syphilis screening was performed by rapid chromatographic immunoassay for the qualitative detection of antibodies (IgG and IgM) to T. pallidum in serum, utilising the Aspen syphilis rapid test strip (Serum/plasma/WB) insert. Malaria screening was carried out using the Falcivax rapid test for malaria Pv/Pf, manufactured by Viola Diagnostic systems, a division of Tulip Diagnostics (P) Ltd. The Falcivax test utilises the principle of agglutination of antibodies/antisera with the respective antigen in an immunochromatography format, along with the use of nano gold particles as an agglutination revealing agent.

Reactive cases of HIV were confirmed by immunochromatography and the western blot method. Reactive cases of HBsAg and HCV were confirmed by the chemiluminescence method in the biochemistry lab. Reactive cases of syphilis were confirmed by ELISA. Reactive cases of malaria were confirmed by a thick peripheral smear in the hematology lab. All first-time reactive cases were discarded while maintaining standard biomedical waste disposal procedures.

Statistical Analysis

The data were collected in an Excel datasheet and analysed.

Results

In the present study, out of 6103 total donors, 961 were voluntary and 5142 were replacement donors. Among the total 6103 donors, 5855 (95.94%) were males and 248 (4.06%) were females (Table/Fig 1). Males outnumbered females.

The age range in the present study was 18-60 years. The highest prevalence of seropositive donors was found within the age group 21-40 years for viral infections. The overall cumulative seroprevalence was lowest, with 3 donors (2.36%) in the age group 18-20 years, then increased up to 40 years of age, with a total of 94 donors in the 21-40 years age group, followed by a decline with increasing age. The highest prevalence of syphilis was seen in the 31-40 years of age (Table/Fig 2).

The prevalence of HIV, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, Syphilis, and Malaria infection among blood donors in the study population is shown in (Table/Fig 3). The overall seroprevalence of HBV, HCV, HIV, Syphilis, and malaria was 0.52%, 0.14%, 0.08%, 1.32%, and 0%, respectively. The prevalence rate was highest for Syphilis, followed by HBsAg, HCV, HIV in decreasing order. HBsAg had the highest seroprevalence among viral infections, followed by HCV and HIV (Table/Fig 3).

In our study, three cases of co-infections were detected: HIV and HCV, HIV and HBsAg, HIV and syphilis.

Discussion

Blood transfusion is an important and life-saving procedure in today’s medical practice. However, it also carries the threat of various TTIs such as HIV, hepatitis B, and Hepatitis C, which can be fatal (6). The occurrence of TTIs ranges as follows: HBV - 0.66% to 12%, HCV - 0.5% to 1.5%, HIV - 0.084% to 3.87%, and syphilis 0.85% to 3% among the Indian population (7).

The high prevalence of TTIs has increased the problems of blood safety. It is essential to continuously monitor the magnitude and trend of TTIs in blood donors. This is important for assessing the effectiveness of screening programs, which might also be directly related to the prevalence of the disease in the community. The present study showed that transfusion-transmitted diseases are more common among males than females, which is comparable to other studies (8),(9). This inequality may be due to the large number of male donors in our study and differences in high-risk behaviour. The smaller number of female donors in the study could be due to less awareness, low education levels, and increased deferral rates among Indian female donors because of the high incidence of anemia and underweight.

The study showed seropositivity only in male replacement donors. Voluntary blood donors and female donors (0%) showed no seropositivity. Replacement donors may conceal some facts related to high-risk behaviour and illness as there is a compulsion to donate blood to get blood for their patients. Most of the infected donors in this study were from the 21-40 years (74%) age group. The findings are similar to studies done by Varma AV et al., and Karmakar PR et al., (3),(10). This might be due to the sexual transmission of diseases in this age group.

The overall seroprevalence of 2.08% of various TTIs among apparently healthy adults indicates the need for sensitive and stringent screening of all blood donors, public awareness programs, and behaviour change communication to the young strata of society to keep them free of these infections.

Though the concern for blood safety is mainly due to HIV infection, Hepatitis B was a more prevalent infection in the present study, similar to other studies from India (11),(12). In the study, the seroprevalence of HBV was 0.52% among the donors, similar to the findings by Cheema S et al., (0.49%) and Sundaramurthy R et al., (0.42%) (13),(14). Lower prevalence was reported by Sharma RI et al., (0.29%) and Adhikari L et al., (0.28%) (15),(16). Higher occurrences than the present study were seen in many other Indian studies (Table/Fig 4) (3),(6),(10),(13),(14),(15),(16),(17),(18),(19),(20),(21),(22),(23),(24),(25),(26),(27),(28). The major route of HBV infection is parenteral. It is most infective among blood-borne viruses, and the chronic carrier state is associated with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Even though there is a safe and effective vaccine, the seroprevalence of HBsAg in India is high. This is because of a long window period between initial HBV infection and the detection of HBsAg, during which the virus is transmissible (29).

In this study, the prevalence of HIV was found to be 0.08%. Similar findings by Varma AV et al., (0.076%), Giri PA et al., (0.07%), and Omhare A et al., (1.45%) have been reported (3),(6),(26). Lower prevalence was reported by Cheema S et al., (0.03%), Sharma RI et al., (0.03%), and Adhikari L et al., (0.01%) (13),(15),(16). Many other Indian studies show a higher prevalence of HIV compared to this study (Table/Fig 4). According to WHO, transfusion of one unit of infected blood with HIV can lead to death in children and adults after 2 years and 3-5 years, respectively (30).

The prevalence of Hepatitis C in the present study was 0.14%, similar to findings by Adhikari L et al., (0.12%), Bhutia CT and Das D (0.15%), and Patil PU et al., (0.14%) (16),(27),(28). Lower seroprevalence was seen in the study done by Varma AV et al., (0.072%) (3). Seroprevalence is higher in many other Indian studies than in our study (Table/Fig 4). Hepatitis C is a blood-borne infection. Compared to Hepatitis B, the chances of progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma are higher in hepatitis C infection.

The prevalence of syphilis in the present study was 1.32%, similar to findings by Rawat A et al., (1.62%) (25). The study showed a higher prevalence of syphilis than many other Indian studies (Table/Fig 4). Syphilis is a sexually transmitted disease, which is likely to be associated with an increasing risk of HIV infection and hence increasing the risk of morbidity and mortality (27).

Globally, there were an estimated 247 million malaria cases in 2021 in 84 malaria-endemic countries. India accounted for 79% of cases in the region (31). The NACO guidelines state that donors affected with Malaria should be deferred for at least the next three months (10). In the study, no malaria cases were detected (0%), similar to the findings by Adhikari L et al., (0%) and Pallavi P et al., (0%) (16),(21). Though malaria constitutes a significant health problem globally, the prevalence of malaria among the blood donors is low in most studies and ranges from 0% to 0.06% (Table/Fig 4). The absence of malaria prevalence may be due to proper history taking and effective screening methods used in our blood bank.

In our study, three cases of co-infections were detected: HIV and HCV, HIV and HBsAg, HIV and syphilis. Chandekar SA et al., study also reported six cases of coinfections, commonly HIV and HBsAg followed by HIV and syphilis (32). As these pathogens share common modes of transmission and risk groups, that is the reason for the occurrence of coinfections.

The wide variations of HCV seroprevalence are different in Indian studies. The main reason for this variation can be the use of different ELISA kits with different specificity and sensitivity (25). In India, both HBV and HCV infections occur with variable numbers because of variation in ethnicity and geography (33).

The introduction of more sensitive tests such as the Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT) that can detect acute viral infections during the serological window period when all serological markers are still negative is another strategy to improve the safety of blood donation. The main reason for not using this technique in the present study area is unaffordability (34).

Limitation(s)

The major limitation of the study is that there is no previous data available from this area for comparison. Another limitation of the study may be associated with intrinsic weaknesses of the diagnostic test - the use of serological as opposed to nucleic acid-based techniques. Therefore, the results may underestimate the frequency of TTIs among donors in this population.

Conclusion

Blood is one of the main sources of transmission of HBV, HCV, HIV, syphilis, and malaria infections. The study showed that TTIs were seen in male replacement donors. Thus, there is a need to increase public awareness regarding voluntary donation and its benefits. Female participation is also encouraged for blood donation. The study also shows a higher prevalence of syphilis. Therefore, it requires improved post-donation counseling for continued and sustained efforts for case detection, treatment, and other preventive measures to contain the disease. Availability of safe blood for transfusion is a must for the recipients and the communities. Meticulous donor screening and the use of highly sensitive techniques for the detection of TTIs are highly recommended to ensure the safety of blood for the recipient.

References

1.
Shah RK. Transfusion Medicine Technical manual. Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, 2003 edition, Sponsored by World Health Organization (WHO).
2.
Manzoor I, Hashm NI, Daud S, Ajmal S, Fatima H, Rasheed Z, et al. Seroprevalence of transfusion transmissible infections in blood donors. Biomedica. 2009;25(10):154-58.
3.
Varma AV, Malpani G, Kosta S, Malukani K, Sarda B, Raghuvanshi A. Seroprevalence of transfusion transmissible infections among blood donors at a tertiary care teaching hospital in central India. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research. 2019;6(12):L1-L4. [crossref]
4.
Global progress report on HIV, viral hepatitis, and sexually transmitted infections, 2021. Accountability for the global health sector strategies 2016-2021: Actions for impact. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
5.
National AIDS Control Organization. Standards for Blood Banks and Blood transfusion Services. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India; 2007.
6.
Giri PA, Deshpande JD, Phalke DB, Karle LB. Seroprevalence of transfusion transmissible infections among voluntary blood donors at a tertiary care teaching hospital in rural area of India. J Fam Med Primary Care. 2012;1(1):48-51. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Chattoraj A, Bhel R, Kataria V. Infectious disease markers in blood donors. Med J Armed Forces India. 2008;64(1):33-35. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Choudhary IA, Samiullah, Khan SS, Masood K, Sardar MA, Mallhi AA. Seroprevalence of HBV and C among health donors at Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi. Pak Med J. 2007;23:64-67.
9.
Mumtaz S, Rehman MV, Muzaffar M, Hassan MU, Iqbal W. Frequency of seropositive blood donors for Hepatitis B, C & HIV viruses in railway hospital, Rawalpindi. Pak J Med Res. 2002;41:19-22.
10.
Karmakar PR, Shrivastava P, Ray TG. Seroprevalence of transfusion transmissible infections among blood donors at the blood bank of a Medical College of Kolkata. Indian J Public Health. 2014;58(1):61-64. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Unnikrishnan B, Rao P, Kumar N. Profile of blood donors and reasons for deferral in coastal South India. Australas Med J. 2011;4(7):379-85. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Kaur G, Basu S, Kaur R, Kaur P, Garg S. Patterns of infections among blood donors in a tertiary care center: A retrospective study. Natl Med J India. 2010;23(3):147-49.
13.
Cheema S, Rana V, Kulhari K, Yadav A, Sachdeva A. Prevalence of transfusion infections and associated factors among healthy blood donors in North Indian population-4-year experience of licensed blood bank at tertiary care hospital. J Mar Med Soc. 2022;24(Suppl 1):p S47-S52.
14.
Sundaramurthy R, Arunagiri R, Ganesan V, Perumal S, Tiruvanamalai R, Charles J. Seroprevalence of transfusion transmissible infections among blood donors by chemiluminescent assay in a tertiary care centre. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2018;12(1):31-36. Doi: 10.3855/jidc.9430. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Sharma RI, Patel KJ, Patel HL, Dharaiya CM. Seroprevalence of transfusion transmissible infections among blood donors in tertiary care center of Gandhinagar, Gujrat. Trop J Path Micro. 2018;4:302-07. [crossref]
16.
Adhikary M, Mazumdar M, Mukhopadhyay SG, Phukan JP, Sana PK, Jain BB. Seroprevalence of transfusion-transmitted infections among blood donors in a newly established medical college of Eastern India. Iraqi J Hematol. 2021;10:134-38. [crossref]
17.
Pahuja S, Sharma M, Baitha B, Jain M. Prevalence and trends of markers of hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B virus and human immunodeficiency virus in Delhi blood donors: A hospital-based study. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2007;60(6):389 91. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Bhattacharya P, Chandra PK, Datta S, Banerjee A, Chakraborty S, Rajendran K, et al. Significant increase in HBV, HCV, HIV and syphilis infections among blood donors in West Bengal, Eastern India 2004 2005: Exploratory screening reveals high frequency of occult HBV infection. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(27):3730 33. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Adhikari L, Bhatta D, Tsering DC, Sharma DK, Pal R, Gupta A. Infectious disease markers in blood donors at Central Referral Hospital, Gangtok, Sikkim. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2010;4(1):41 42. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Arora D, Arora B, Khetarpal A. Seroprevalence of HIV, HBV, HCV, and syphilis in blood donors in Southern Haryana. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2010;53(2):308 09. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Pallavi P, Ganesh CK, Jayashree K, Manjunath GV. Seroprevalence and trends in transfusion transmitted infections among blood donors in a University Hospital blood bank: A 5-year study. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2011;27(1):01 06. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Anjali H, Issac A, Anjali MR, Anish TS. Transfusion transmissible infections among voluntary blood donors at Government Medical College Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2012;6(1):55 56. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Negi G, Gaur DS. Trends of transfusion transmissible diseases among blood donors at Uttarakhand, India. Indian J Community Med. 2014;39(3):183-86. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Mandal R, Mondal K. Transfusion transmissible infections among blood donors from a sub-Himalayan rural tertiary care center in Darjeeling, India. J Tradit Complement Med. 2015;6(3):224-29. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Rawat A, Diwaker P, Gogoi P, Singh B. Seroprevalence and changing trends of transfusion-transmitted infections amongst blood donors in a Regional Blood Transfusion Centre in north India. Indian J Med Res. 2017;146(5):642-45.
26.
Omhare A, Purwar N, Singh SK, Rana U. Study of serological prevalence of transfusion transmissible infections among blood donors in a tertiary care hospital in North India. Ind J Pathol Oncol. 2018;5(2):212-15. [crossref]
27.
Bhutia CT, Das D. Prevalence of transfusion transmitted infections from Eastern part of India: A 5-year experience. Annals Pathol Lab Med. 2019;6(11):600-04. [crossref]
28.
Patil PU, Gowai S, Joshi A. Seroprevalence of transfusion transmitted infections among blood donors: A 8-year regional blood bank experience. Gal Int J Health Sci Res. 2020;5(1):150-54.
29.
Gupta R, Singh B, Singh DK, Chugh M. Prevalence and trends of transfusion transmitted infections in a regional blood transfusion Centre. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2011;5(2):177-78. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
National AIDS Control Organization (NACO, India). Standards for blood banks and Blood Transfusion Services. New Delhi: NACO, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2007.
31.
World malaria report 2022. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
32.
Chandekar SA, Amonkar GP, Desai HM, Valvi N, Puranik GV. Seroprevalence of transfusion transmitted infections in healthy blood donors: A 5-year tertiary care hospital experience. J Lab Physicians. 2017;9(4):283-87. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Das S, Harendra kumar ML. Viral hepatitisdes among the blood donors in a rural based hospital: A five-year study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2012;6(4):619-22.
34.
Teo KS, Saparudin MS, Zain Z, Morshidi MA, Metassan N, Jaberudin R, et al. Transfusion transmissible infections in Brunei Darussalam: A blood donor study. Brunei Int Med J. 2011;7(6):321-27.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/62976.19105

Date of Submission: Jan 19, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Mar 07, 2023
Date of Acceptance: May 20, 2023
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 24, 2023
• Manual Googling: May 12, 2023
• iThenticate Software: May 17, 2023 (3%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com