Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 52296

AbstractConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Reviews
Year : 2024 | Month : February | Volume : 18 | Issue : 2 | Page : DE01 - DE05 Full Version

A Bidirectional Immunological Relationship between Diabetes Mellitus and Tuberculosis: A Narrative Review


Published: February 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/67692.18994
Pavithra Selvan, Nalini Jayanthi Nagesh, Leela Kakithakara Vajravelu, C Syed Akram, B Karniha

1. Research Scholar, Department of Microbiology, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, SRMIST, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Respiratory Medicine, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, SRMIST, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, SRMIST, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Postgraduate, Department of Respiratory Medicine, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, SRMIST, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India. 5. Senior Resident, Department of Respiratory Medicine, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, SRMIST, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Ms. Pavithra Selvan,
Research Scholar, Department of Microbiology, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu-603203, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: jeevepavi123@gmail.com

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the most common contagious diseases worldwide. Over the past few decades, researchers have made significant efforts to prevent TB. Recent predictions indicate that the prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) will reach 552 million by 2023 due to ongoing epidemiological changes in several countries across the globe. India is expected to have 62-80 million people with diabetes by 2030, making it the “Diabetes Capital” of the world. Present review discusses the urgent need to understand the mechanisms and implications of DM on the immune systems of TB patients. The correlation between TB and DM has been shown to be bidirectional. Numerous studies have revealed a higher prevalence of diabetes in TB patients, as their immune systems are compromised. TB patients with DM experience progressive deficits in both innate and adaptive immune cell activity, reducing their ability to suppress Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) and increasing their risk of developing TB. Increased inflammation and elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines in circulation are characteristics of TB with DM co-morbidity, which indicate the active involvement of the angiogenesis-inflammation nexus. Therefore, to alleviate the burden of both disorders, it would be beneficial to make informed therapy choices by gaining a better understanding of TB immunology in the context of DM.

Keywords

Adaptive immunity, Cytokines, Innate immunity, Mycobacterium tuberculosis

One of the most prevalent infectious diseases worldwide is TB. In recent decades, researchers have made great strides in TB prevention. The current initiatives to stop the spread of TB appear to have clearly decreased incidence, and these challenges are nearing an end (1). According to World Health Organisation (WHO) data from July 2023, 10.6 million new active TB cases are anticipated to be recorded annually globally (2). As per WHO, there were 108 million people with diabetes in the world in 1980 compared to 422 million in 2014 (3). From this, it was predicted that by 2019, there would be around 463 million people impacted. It was also estimated that by 2030, there would be 578 million people affected, and by 2045, there would be 700 million people affected, respectively (4). According to WHO, DM may be a factor in 15% of all TB cases worldwide (5). By 2025, India would be the “Diabetes Capital” of the world, with an estimated 69.9 million people having the disease (6).

DM is still seen as a possible threat that needs to be managed and treated for TB, despite the fact that its prevalence is rising. To lessen the dual burden, the WHO has nonetheless recommended several important intervention strategies, including the establishment of collaborative control programs, the identification and treatment of DM in TB patients, as well as the detection and management of TB in DM patients (7). Therefore, it is crucial to comprehend the extent and immunological processes by considering the link between TB and diabetes, notably in countries with low and middle incomes. The prevalence of diabetes and TB in different countries indicates an increased preponderance of about 29% in India, 26.5% in Korea, 25% in Mexico-Texas, and 15.8% in Ethiopia (8).

Despite the fact that the relationship between TB and DM has been known for many years, a striking global rise in DM prompted the International Union Against TB and Lung Disease as well as the WHO to issue global recommendations by 2011, mandating that all TB patients be screened for DM (9). Furthermore, TB screening programs using DM have already started in India. However, it has been discovered that a lack of knowledge about the technology and the most effective ways for screening in TB centers was impeding global responses to this epidemic (10).

Although the relationship between TB and DM, as well as their cooperative effect in producing illnesses in humans, has recently been a top focus for basic and clinical studies, it remains a widely known fact. Pulmonary Tuberculosis (PTB) and DM, along with a combination of both ailments, are the two most prevalent conditions that co-exist in various regions of the world, posing a serious risk to global medical treatment (11). As DM manifests as a causal factor for becoming an active TB patient, several clinical and epidemiological investigations have come into sharper focus. Furthermore, the correlation between diabetes and TB among those with the condition has had a negative effect on how the disease manifests and how treatments work. However, the available information is currently insufficient for making informed decisions, as it has negative effects on the health of people with diabetes globally (12). Thus, the present review discusses the robust need for understanding the mechanisms and implications of DM affecting TB patients’ immune systems.

Diabetes- A Potential Tuberculosis (TB) Risk Factor

In developing countries where TB is more prevalent, the incidence of DM is increasing. Consequently, locations with the fewest healthcare resources are most likely to witness the confluence of these two epidemics (13). Diabetes serves as a separate risk factor for all lower respiratory tract infections. Clinical investigations have yielded contradictory findings. However, patients with concomitant TB and DM may also exhibit atypical radiological abnormalities, as well as a high frequency of haemoptysis and fever (14). Several studies have indicated that people with diabetes who have TB develop lung cavities more or less frequently compared to those without diabetes who also have TB (15),(16),(17). TB infection is more likely to occur among individuals with Type 1 DM (T1DM), despite the fact that Type 2 DM (T2DM) is more common. Additional risk factors for TB in people with T1DM include low body weight, youth, and inadequate glycaemic management (18).

Tuberculosis (TB)- The Risk Factor for Diabetes Mellitus (DM)

It has been discovered that there is a bidirectional association between TB and DM. Numerous studies have shown that TB patients have higher rates of diabetes due to their weaker immune systems (19),(20),(21). Impaired glucose tolerance is one of the primary causes of DM development in TB patients. In most of these cases, the risk of contracting TB persists even after effective TB treatment, although the altered glucose tolerance level returns to normal. Hyperglycaemia may be the initial symptom of pancreatic TB, as pancreatitis often results from TB (22). Pancreatic hypofunction emerges as the most crucial factor in this process, despite the possibility that some of the TB-related hyperglycaemic conditions may be caused by intense stress related to the infection itself. Hyperglycaemia associated with TB necessitates diabetic patients to regulate their blood sugar levels, ensuring that the insulin dosage is adjusted accordingly (23).

Aetiological Association

Cellular immunity is known to decline in people with diabetes. Diabetics have a lower neutrophil count and fewer T-cells. Individuals who have both diabetes and TB concurrently exhibit lower production levels of T-helper 1 (Th1) cytokine response, TNF-alpha production, IL-6, and IL-1β compared to those without diabetes (24). Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacilli need to be controlled and inhibited with the help of Th1 cytokines. This reduction in the function and number of T lymphocytes has been considered a key mechanism behind the increased susceptibility of diabetes patients to TB (25). Moreover, diabetes patients also experience impaired phagocytic, chemotactic, and Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) generation in macrophages, which inhibits macrophage activity. The interaction of these dysfunctional processes makes diabetes patients more prone to developing TB (26). It is important to note that the symptoms of these two conditions can resemble each other. Lethargy, exhaustion, fever, weight loss, and loss of appetite are a few symptoms that are common to both. People with diabetes may sometimes complain to their doctors about worsened blood sugar regulation, only to discover that they have TB (27).

Immunological Characteristics of Tuberculosis (TB) and Diabetes Mellitus (DM) Patients

Persistent hyperglycaemia is a hallmark of diabetes, which includes both T1DM and T2DM caused by escalating insulin resistance or insufficient insulin production (28). Previous studies have shown that persistent hyperglycaemia in DM affects the immune system in several ways, including: 1) inflammation leading to a decrease in Dendritic Cells (DCs); 2) Proinflammatory substances are produced more often as a result of increased macrophage infiltration, which will cause islet cell malfunction and death; 3) heightened generation of ROS by neutrophils, increasing the risk of organ damage; and 4) Increases in Natural Killer (NK) cells are accompanied with dysfunctional NK cells that express a lot of Glucose Transporter Type 4 (GLUT4) (29),(30),(31). Additionally, apart from impacting the humoral immune system, high blood glucose levels in diabetes patients also lead to functional abnormalities in CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes due to non enzymatic glycosylation and a number of protein covalent compounds. These impair their ability to eliminate infections and make them more to apoptosis-prone (Table/Fig 1) (30).

Traits of the Immune System in Tuberculosis (TB) and Diabetes Mellitus (DM)

Diabetes can hinder the host’s adaptive and innate immunity, making it more challenging to eradicate M. tuberculosis and increasing the risk of developing TB. Firstly, elevated blood sugar levels can make macrophages more M2 polarised, which reduces their ability to phagocytose by raising the quantity of M. tuberculosis that is present in-vivo (32). Secondly, hyperglycaemia increases the absolute neutrophil count but decreases their phagocytic ability. Thirdly, the increased presence of NK cells, which release TNFα, IL-2, and IL-17F, further exacerbates the illness or results in larger bacterial loads (33). Fourthly, DM decreases the secretion of DCs, thereby reducing CD4+ T-cell activation and compromising adaptive immunity. Hyperglycaemia inhibits the production of cytokines like TNF and Interferons (IFN-γ) by Th1 T-cells, diminishing the effectiveness of the Th1 immune response in eliminating and eradicating M. tuberculosis (34). Additionally, a decrease in IFN-α may impede the activation of CD8+ T lymphocytes by Th1-type cells, leading to reduced production of bactericidal molecules such as IFN-γ, granzyme, and lysozyme. Consequently, the cytotoxic T-cells’ ability to kill the bacilli is compromised. The impaired ability of TB patients with DM to control M. tuberculosis increases their susceptibility to acquiring TB, as both innate and adaptive immune cell functions progressively decline (35).

Innate Immunity of Tuberculosis (TB) with Diabetes Mellitus (DM)

There is limited information available regarding the circumstances leading to the initial interaction between M. tuberculosis and the innate immunity of hosts with DM. To address this, an in-vitro experiment has been initiated to examine how M. tuberculosis interacts with human blood monocytes obtained from M. tuberculosis-naive patients with and without diabetes (36).

Differences in innate immunity between individuals with and without diabetes significantly influence the susceptibility and pathogenesis of TB. Modifications in DM’s metabolism have been shown to negatively impact macrophages, neutrophils, NK cells, DCs, and other components of the innate immune system. Therefore, malfunctioning of the immune system in DM patients can significantly affect the host’s susceptibility to exogenous TB infections and the likelihood of recurrence (37).

Among DM patients, a decreased rate of M. tuberculosis phagocytosis, altered expression of genes involved in M. tuberculosis antigen presentation, and increased production of anti-mycobacterial peptides have been observed, resulting in changes in innate immunity. Additionally, defects may exist in cell trafficking within peripheral blood monocytes. Despite DM potentially causing immunological abnormalities first and then predisposing individuals to TB, patients with both TB and DM may share similar acquired or genetic vulnerabilities that make them more susceptible to both diseases (38).

Adaptive Immunity among Tuberculosis (TB) Patients with Diabetes Mellitus (DM)

Several studies have compared TB patients with DM to TB patients without DM, and it has been found that adaptive immunity to M. tuberculosis plays a more crucial role than DM. TB patients with DM tend to have lower levels of naturally occurring T-regulatory cells (CD4+, CD25+, and CD127-) and elevated levels of cytokines such as Th1 (IL-2, IFN-γ) and Th17 (IL-17A, but not IL-22) (39). Both anti-inflammatory and proinflammatory cytokine levels have been shown to be higher in TB patients with DM compared to TB patients without diabetes, attributable to higher levels of Interleukin-10 (IL-10) (40). Additionally, Sun L et al., discovered that TB patients with diabetes may exhibit an unusual Th2 response in the lung lobes, characterised by lower levels of IFN-γ but higher levels of IL-10 in bronchoalveolar lavage (41).

The majority of studies on the adaptive immune system suggest that TB patients with DM exhibit an overactive cell-mediated response against M. tuberculosis antigens. However, further research is needed to explore this hyper-response and its connection with DM, including its role in immunopathology and increased susceptibility to TB (42),(43),(44). Data from TB patients without DM indirectly support the notion that individuals with diabetes have compromised immunity, rendering them more susceptible to TB. One of these investigations also found that individuals with TB and DM had significantly lower ratios of IFN-γ to IL-10 (Table/Fig 2) (28),(31),(32),(33),(37),(41),(43).

Immunological Effects of Diabetes over Tuberculosis (TB)- Severity and Treatment Outcomes

Diabetes patients experience a faster progression of M. tuberculosis infection compared to non diabetic controls, as well as shorter lifespans, higher rates of pulmonary and extrapulmonary infections, and heavier bacterial loads. Several studies have also noted the detrimental impact of DM on the effective management and prognosis of TB (44),(45),(46). However, there is no conclusive evidence regarding the impact of DM on the efficacy of TB treatments, and the findings are mixed. It is worth noting that DM can alter the pharmacokinetics of certain anti-TB medications. Understanding the detrimental impact of DM on TB therapy is important because the effectiveness of most anti-TB drugs depends on their plasma concentration (47). The altered plasma levels in diabetics may be due to variations in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and/or excretion. Lower plasma levels of anti-TB drugs are associated with drug resistance, which can make the treatment of TB in diabetics more challenging (48).

Furthermore, individuals with TB and DM have higher mortality rates due to the disease’s progression, miliary TB, and increased bacterial burdens. Laboratory studies on animals have shown that inducing hyperglycaemia increases the frequency of M. tuberculosis shedding from the airways, even in the absence of cavitations. This increase in M. tuberculosis shedding may be attributed to changes in the diabetic airway microenvironment and an increase in pulmonary bacterial burden. The persistent hyperglycaemia, coupled with oxidative stress, leads to a proinflammatory response that exacerbates inflammation and increases the risk of TB infection in diabetics (49).

However, DM patients who acquire TB infections deteriorate rapidly before developing M. tuberculosis adaptive immunity. This is attributed to high levels of IL-4 and anti-inflammatory cytokines, which suppress the expression of IFN-γ and contribute to the inability to control bacterial growth. Cohort studies have shown that individuals with diabetes have a higher risk of mortality during TB treatment compared to those without the disease (48),(49),(50). The increased bacterial load at diagnosis is believed to contribute to the likelihood of TB treatment failure and delayed TB clearance in DM patients. These factors may be explained by delayed immune response kinetics in DM patients and alterations in the pharmacokinetics of anti-TB medications (drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion) in TB patients with DM (51).

Management of Diabetes

Aggressive management of DM is necessary in TB patients. Achieving optimal glycaemic control is crucial as it improves patient outcomes. It is recommended to initiate insulin therapy immediately, using a basal bolus schedule or premixed insulin. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists advises the use of modern insulins or insulin analogues as they work more predictably and result in less hypoglycaemia (52). The use of traditional human insulins is discouraged. Initially, insulin requirements are high but tend to decrease after a few weeks once glucotoxicity is corrected and the infection is controlled. However, insulin needs may increase again as appetite returns to normal and calorie intake rises. Sick patients should be checked for ketonuria. Those with ketonuria may not require hospitalisation, and the use of rapid-acting analogues such as part insulin can be beneficial for critically ill patients. Oral hypoglycaemic medications can be used once the TB infection has subsided, but they should not be taken during severe TB (53).

One medication that has a significant impact on DM management in TB is rifampicin, which is a strong inducer of hepatic enzymes. Rifampicin accelerates the metabolism of various oral hypoglycaemic medications, particularly sulphonylureas and biguanides, leading to decreased plasma levels of these drugs. Therefore, using these medications in diabetic patients may result in hyperglycaemia. Rifampicin can also mimic the signs and symptoms of diabetes and enhance intestinal glucose absorption, even in individuals without diabetes (54). Unlike rifampicin, which may increase the plasma levels of these drugs, isoniazid decreases the metabolism of oral hypoglycaemic agents. Sulphonylureas are their primary interaction, whose effect it opposes and makes worse for diabetics using this medication’s glycaemic control. Additionally, it hinders the action and release of insulin, causing hyperglycaemia even in those without diabetes (55). Therefore, insulin doses should be adjusted when adding or removing these drugs from a patient’s prescription. Dipeptidyl protease inhibitors (gliptins), a relatively new class of hypoglycaemic medications, have the potential to reduce immunocompetence due to their mode of action. This may potentially worsen the outcomes of TB patients (56). Researchers now have a new perspective and an opportunity to better understand the aetiology of the illness because of the increasing involvement of DM in TB. They hope that teams from basic science and epidemiological research will eventually work together to produce a strategy for classifying millions of people with DM into groups depending on their risk of contracting M. tuberculosis or developing TB. Accordingly, those who would benefit the most from Latent TB infection treatment would be advised to do so, while others with the worst prognoses would receive TB treatment tailored to meet their unique needs. Numerous studies have been conducted to show that hyperglycaemia impairs the host’s defense systems by promoting the onset and spread of TB and producing a significantly worse prognosis for therapy (57),(58),(59). Expanding the role of DM in TB offers a fresh viewpoint and an opportunity for researchers to learn more about the aetiology of the disease. It is crucial that to conduct in-depth research into the pathogenic processes of TB with DM to fully understand how hyperglycaemia affects the host’s immune system and provide effective therapy. Hence, to reduce the combined burden of both disorders, it would be helpful to make sensible therapy choices by gaining an improved comprehension of TB immunology with DM.

Conclusion

The co-occurrence of TB and DM poses a significant concern for individuals as it substantially complicates the treatment process and adversely affects the overall outcome of the disease. Considering the significant influence of the concurrent presence of TB and DM on the treatment and control of diseases, it is imperative to implement public health measures that prioritise early diagnosis and effective management of both TB and DM. Modifying TB treatment protocols for individuals with DM could result in improved glycaemic control, more favourable outcomes, and decreased morbidity. Therefore, this will contribute to the realisation of the End-TB Strategy and the attainment of Sustainable Development Goals for the elimination of TB.

Authors contribution: All authors hold significant and sincere participation in this review and have accepted it for publishing.

References

1.
Paleckyte A, Dissanayake O, Mpagama S, Lipman MC, McHugh TD. Reducing the risk of tuberculosis transmission for HCWs in high incidence settings. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2021;10(1):106. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Tuberculosis. Fact sheets. World Health Organization [Internet]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tuberculosis. [Last accessed on 2023 September 24].
3.
Diabetes. Fact sheets. World Health Organization [Internet]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/diabetes. [Last accessed on 2023 September 24].
4.
Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, Malanda B, Karuranga S, Unwin N, et al. Global and Regional Diabetes Prevalence Estimates for 2019 and Projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th Edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019:157:107843. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
TB and diabetes. World Health Organization [Internet]. Available from: https:// www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240037021. [Last accessed on 2023 September 24].
6.
Khan J, Shaw S. Risk of cataract and glaucoma among older persons with diabetes in India: A cross-sectional study based on LASI, Wave-1. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):11973. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Joshi R, Behera D, Di Tanna GL, Ameer MA, Yakubu K, Praveen D. Integrated management of diabetes and tuberculosis in rural India – Results from a pilot study. Front Public Health. 2022;10:766847. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Ayelign B, Negash M, Genetu M, Wondmagegn T, Shibabaw T. Immunological impacts of diabetes on the susceptibility of mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Immunol Res. 2019;2019:6196532. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Harries AD, Kumar AM, Satyanarayana S, Lin Y, Zachariah R, Lönnroth K, et al. Diabetes mellitus and tuberculosis: Programmatic management issues. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015;19(8):879-86. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Mave V, Nimkar S, Prasad H, Kadam D, Meshram S, Lokhande R, et al. Tuberculosis screening among persons with diabetes mellitus in Pune, India. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):388. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Li M, Chen T, Hua Z, Yan H, Wang D, Li Z, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of diabetes mellitus in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2021;13(1):127. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Lu P, Zhang Y, Liu Q, Ding X, Kong W, Zhu L, et al. Association of BMI, diabetes, and risk of tuberculosis: A population-based prospective cohort. Int J Infect Dis. 2021;109:168-73. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Fazaludeen Koya S, Lordson J, Khan S, Kumar B, Grace C, Nayar KR, et al. Tuberculosis and Diabetes in India: Stakeholder perspectives on health system challenges and opportunities for integrated care. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2022;12(1):104-12. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Yorke E, Atiase Y, Akpalu J, Sarfo-Kantanka O, Boima V, Dey ID. The bidirectional relationship between tuberculosis and diabetes. Tuberc Res Treat. 2017;2017:1702578. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Sannithi K, Singh T, Angali N, Prasad R, Sureka RK. Intensive case finding of tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus-bidirectional screening of patients attending a tertiary teaching hospital in rural Telangana, India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2022;16(8):DC16-DC21. [crossref]
16.
Nakamura A, Hagiwara E, Hamai J, Taguri M, Terauchi Y. Impact of underlying diabetes and presence of lung cavities on treatment outcomes in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Diabet Med. 2014;31(6):707-13. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Huang LK, Jiang LD, Lai YC, Wu MH, Chang SC. Pulmonary tuberculous cavities in diabetic patients: Glycemic control is still the dominant factor despite the emerging role of metformin. J Chin Med Assoc. 2019;82(8):628-34. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Nyirenda JL, Wagner D, Ngwira B, Lange B. Bidirectional screening and treatment outcomes of diabetes mellitus (DM) and tuberculosis (TB) patients in hospitals with measures to integrate care of DM and TB and those without integration measures in Malawi. BMC Infect Dis. 2022;22(1):28. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Abbas U, Masood KI, Khan A, Irfan M, Saifullah N, Jamil B, et al. Tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus: Relating immune impact of co-morbidity with challenges in disease management in high burden countries. J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis. 2022;29:100343.[crossref][PubMed]
20.
Ferlita S, Yegiazaryan A, Noori N, Lal G, Nguyen T, To K, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and altered immune system leading to susceptibility to pathogens, especially mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Med. 2019;8(12):2219. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Wei R, Li P, Xue Y, Liu Y, Gong W, Zhao W. Impact of diabetes mellitus on the immunity of tuberculosis patients: A retrospective, cross-sectional study. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022;15:611-27. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Gautam S, Shrestha N, Mahato S, Nguyen TP, Mishra SR, Berg-Beckhoff G. Diabetes among tuberculosis patients and its impact on tuberculosis treatment in South Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1):2113. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Raposo-García S, Guerra-Laso JM, García-García S, Juan-García J, López- Fidalgo E, Diez-Tascón C, et al. Immunological response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in blood from type 2 diabetes patients. Immunol Lett. 2017;186:41-45. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Selvan GT, Gollapalli P, Shetty P, Kumari NS. Exploring key molecular signatures of immune responses and pathways associated with tuberculosis in comorbid diabetes mellitus: A systems biology approach. Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 2022;11(1):77. [crossref]
25.
Lavalett L, Ortega H, Barrera LF. Infection of monocytes from tuberculosis patients with two virulent clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis induces alterations in myeloid effector functions. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:163. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Cadena J, Rathinavelu S, Lopez-Alvarenga JC, Restrepo BI. The re-emerging association between tuberculosis and diabetes: Lessons from past centuries. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2019;116S:S89-S97. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
van Crevel R, Koesoemadinata R, Hill PC, Harries AD. Clinical management of combined tuberculosis and diabetes. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2018;22(12):1404-10. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Berbudi A, Rahmadika N, Tjahjadi AI, Ruslami R. Type 2 diabetes and its impact on the immune system. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2020;16(5):442-49. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Kumar Nathella P, Babu S. Influence of diabetes mellitus on immunity to human tuberculosis. Immunology. 2017;152(1):13-24. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Cheng P, Wang L, Gong W. Cellular immunity of patients with tuberculosis combined with diabetes. J Immunol Res. 2022;2022:6837745. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Prada-Medina CA, Fukutani KF, Pavan Kumar N, Gil-Santana L, Babu S, Lichtenstein F, et al. Systems immunology of diabetes-tuberculosis comorbidity reveals signatures of disease complications. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1):1999. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Lopez-Lopez N, Martinez AGR, Garcia-Hernandez MH, Hernandez-Pando R, Castañeda-Delgado JE, Lugo-Villarino G, et al. Type-2 diabetes alters the basal phenotype of human macrophages and diminishes their capacity to respond, internalise, and control Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2018;113(4):e170326. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Kumar NP, Moideen K, George PJ, Dolla C, Kumaran P, Babu S. Impaired cytokine but enhanced cytotoxic marker expression in Mycobacterium tuberculosis-induced CD8+ T cells in individuals with type 2 diabetes and latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J Infect Dis. 2016;213(5):866-70. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Kumar NP, Babu S. Impact of diabetes mellitus on immunity to latent tuberculosis infection. Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2023;4:1095467. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Bisht MK, Dahiya P, Ghosh S, Mukhopadhyay S. The cause-effect relation of tuberculosis on incidence of diabetes mellitus. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023;13:1134036. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Vance J, Santos A, Sadofsky L, Morice A, Cervantes J. Effect of high glucose on human alveolar macrophage phenotype and phagocytosis of mycobacteria. Lung. 2019;197(1):89-94. [crossref][PubMed]
37.
Ssekamatte P, Sande OJ, van Crevel R, Biraro IA. Immunologic, metabolic and genetic impact of diabetes on tuberculosis susceptibility. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1122255. [crossref][PubMed]
38.
Kundu J, Verma A, Verma I, Bhadada SK, Sharma S. Molecular mechanism of interaction of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with host macrophages under high glucose conditions. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2021;26:100997. [crossref][PubMed]
39.
Riza AL, Pearson F, Ugarte-Gil C, Alisjahbana B, van de Vijver S, Panduru NM, et al. Clinical management of concurrent diabetes and tuberculosis and the implications for patient services. Diabetes and Tuberculosis. 2014;2(9):740-53. [crossref][PubMed]
40.
Ahmad SR, Yaacob NA, Jaeb MZ, Hussin Z, Wan Mohammad WMZ. Effect of diabetes mellitus on tuberculosis treatment outcomes among tuberculosis patients in Kelantan, Malaysia. Iran J Public Health. 2020;49(8):1485-93. [crossref][PubMed]
41.
Sun L, Louie MC, Vannella KM, Wilke CA, LeVine AM, Moore BB, et al. New concepts of IL-10-induced lung fibrosis: Fibrocyte recruitment and M2 activation in a CCL2/CCR2 axis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2011;300(3):L341-53. [crossref][PubMed]
42.
Kumar NP, Moideen K, Viswanathan V, Kornfeld H, Babu S. Effect of standard tuberculosis treatment on naive, memory and regulatory T-cell homeostasis in tuberculosis-diabetes co-morbidity. Immunology. 2016;149(1):87-97. [crossref][PubMed]
43.
Kumar NP, Sridhar R, Banurekha VV, Jawahar MS, Nutman TB, Babu S. Expansion of pathogen-specific T-helper 1 and T-helper 17 cells in pulmonary tuberculosis with coincident type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Infect Dis. 2013;208(5):739-48. [crossref][PubMed]
44.
Ponnana M, Pydi S, Gaddam S. Enumeration of lymphocyte subsets during follow-up in the pulmonary tuberculosis patients with co morbid diabetes mellitus. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;510:566-72. [crossref][PubMed]
45.
Lin KH, Luo CW, Chen SP, Tu DG, Lin MS, Kuan YH. α-Glucosidase inhibitor can effectively inhibit the risk of tuberculosis in patients with diabetes: A nested case-control study. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:8085106. [crossref][PubMed]
46.
Ngo MD, Bartlett S, Ronacher K. Diabetes-associated susceptibility to tuberculosis: Contribution of hyperglycemia vs. dyslipidemia. Microorganisms. 2021;9(11):2282. [crossref][PubMed]
47.
Alfarisi O, Mave V, Gaikwad S, Sahasrabudhe T, Ramachandran G, Kumar H, et al. Effect of diabetes mellitus on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tuberculosis treatment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62(11):e01383-18. [crossref][PubMed]
48.
Song WM, Li YF, Liu JY, Tao NN, Liu Y, Zhang QY, et al. Drug resistance of previously treated tuberculosis patients with diabetes mellitus in Shandong, China. Respir Med. 2020;163:105897. [crossref][PubMed]
49.
Workneh MH, Bjune GA, Yimer SA. Prevalence and associated factors of tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus comorbidity: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2017;12(4):e0175925. [crossref][PubMed]
50.
Adane HT, Howe RC, Wassie L, Magee MJ. Diabetes mellitus is associated with an increased risk of unsuccessful treatment outcomes among drug-susceptible tuberculosis patients in Ethiopia: A prospective health facility-based study. J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis. 2023;31:100368. [crossref][PubMed]
52.
Xu G, Hu X, Lian Y, Li X. Diabetes mellitus affects the treatment outcomes of drug-resistant tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2023;23(1):813. [crossref][PubMed]
52.
Bahendeka S, Kaushik R, Swai AB, Otieno F, Bajaj S, Kalra S, et al. EADSG Guidelines: Insulin storage and optimisation of injection technique in diabetes management. Diabetes Ther. 2019;10(2):341-66. [crossref][PubMed]
53.
Niazi AK, Kalra S. Diabetes and tuberculosis: A review of the role of optimal glycemic control. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2012;11(1):28. [crossref][PubMed]
54.
Wang JY, Lee MC, Shu CC, Lee CH, Lee LN, Chao KM, et al. Optimal duration of anti-TB treatment in patients with diabetes: Nine or six months? Chest. 2015;147(2):520-28. [crossref][PubMed]
55.
Te Brake LHM, Yunivita V, Livia R, Soetedjo N, van Ewijk-Beneken Kolmer E, Koenderink JB, et al. Rifampicin alters metformin plasma exposure but not blood glucose levels in diabetic tuberculosis patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019;105(3):730-37. [crossref][PubMed]
56.
Yin R, Xu Y, Wang X, Yang L, Zhao D. Role of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors in antidiabetic treatment. Molecules. 2022;27(10):3055. [crossref][PubMed]
57.
Menon S, Rossi R, Dusabimana A, Zdraveska N, Bhattacharyya S, Francis J. The epidemiology of tuberculosis-associated hyperglycemia in individuals newly screened for type 2 diabetes mellitus: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):937. [crossref][PubMed]
58.
Critchley JA, Restrepo BI, Ronacher K, Kapur A, Bremer AA, Schlesinger LS, et al. Defining a research agenda to address the converging epidemics of tuberculosis and diabetes: part 1: Epidemiology and clinical management. Chest. 2017;152(1):165-73. [crossref][PubMed]
59.
Pal R, Ansari MA, Hameed S, Fatima Z. Diabetes mellitus as hub for tuberculosis infection: A snapshot. Int J Chronic Dis. 2016;2016:5981574.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/67692.18994

Date of Submission: Sep 24, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Dec 07, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Dec 28, 2023
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 25, 2023
• Manual Googling: Dec 09, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Dec 25, 2023 (11%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 5

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com