Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 47921

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : January | Volume : 18 | Issue : 1 | Page : ZC36 - ZC41 Full Version

Efficacy of Two Paediatric Rotary Systems: Kedo-SG BlueTM and Prime PedoTM Files in Primary Mandibular Molars: A Randomised Clinical Trial


Published: January 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/63534.18917
Saranya Jeepalyam, SVSG Nirmala, Sivakumar Nuvvula

1. Former Resident, Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Narayana Dental College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India. 2. Professor, Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Narayana Dental College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India. 3. Professor and Head, Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Narayana Dental College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
SVSG Nirmala,
Professor, Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Narayana Dental College and Hospital, Chilthareddypalem, Nellore-524003, Andhra Pradesh, India.
E-mail: nimskrishna2007@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The success of root canal procedures depends on cleaning and shaping of canals. There are several instrumentation techniques available for root canal preparation. Recently, exclusive rotary file systems called Kedo-SG Blue and Prime-Pedo have been introduced for root canal preparation in primary teeth. The inherent flexibility of these files allows them to preserve the anatomy of curved canals in primary molars.

Aim: To compare the instrumentation time, obturation time, and quality of obturation using two paediatric rotary file systems, Kedo-SG BlueTM and Prime-PedoTM, in mandibular primary molars.

Materials and Methods: A randomised clinical trial was conducted in the outpatient Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Narayana Dental College and Hospital, Nellore Andhra Pradesh, India, from February 1, 2019 to January 20, 2020. Fifty primary molars with necrotic pulp were included and randomly divided into two groups, with 25 teeth in each group. Group 1 and Group 2 were instrumented with Kedo-SG BlueTM and Prime-PedoTM, respectively. The time taken for instrumentation and obturation was noted in minutes, and the quality of root canal filling was recorded as optimal, underfilled, or overfilled. The data were statistically analysed using an independent Student’s t-test for time measurements and a Chi-square test for the quality of obturation.

Results: There was a statistically significant difference in instrumentation time and obturation time between the two groups (p-value=0.009; 0.011). The Kedo-SG BlueTM rotary system showed a better quality of obturation compared to the Prime-PedoTM rotary system, although the difference was not statistically significant (p-value=0.22).

Conclusion: The Kedo-SG BlueTM rotary system demonstrated shorter instrumentation and obturation times, as well as a higher number of optimally filled canals compared to the Prime-PedoTM rotary system. Therefore, the Kedo-SG BlueTM rotary system exhibited better clinical performance in primary molars than the Prime-PedoTM rotary system.

Keywords

Children, Instrumentation time, Paediatric endodontics, Primary teeth, Pulpectomy

Dental caries is ubiquitous worldwide, causing dental pain and tooth loss in the population. If left untreated, dental caries can progress into the pulp, resulting in severe pain and infection, leading to premature exfoliation of primary teeth and affecting the permanent teeth. The most commonly used procedure in paediatric endodontics is pulpectomy, which aims to restore the form and function of primary teeth to prevent these problems (1). According to the AAPD, pulpectomy is a root canal procedure for irreversibly infected or necrotic pulp tissue due to caries or trauma (2). The purpose of pulpectomy is to maintain arch length, preserve occlusal function, and promote the eruption of permanent teeth (3),(4).

Endodontic treatment is performed to control infection in the root canals and promote the healing of periapical tissues (5). This objective is achieved through biomechanical instrumentation and canal irrigation (6). Cleaning and shaping of the root canals are critical aspects of endodontic therapy, aiming to remove all pulp tissue, bacteria, and bacterial toxins from the root canal system (7).

Rotary nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) systems have been developed to preserve the original canal shape and are widely used in permanent teeth due to reduced instrumentation time in curved molar root canals and enhanced patient comfort (8),(9),(10).

Barr ES et al., introduced rotary instruments in paediatric endodontics, highlighting that the inherent flexibility of these files allows them to preserve the anatomy of curved canals in primary molars (11). They concluded that using Ni-Ti rotary files in root canal preparation was cost-effective, time-saving, and resulted in predictable and uniform fillings (12). Kuo C et al., suggested that a rotary file with modified dimensions (length, taper, and tip size) would be more beneficial for pulpectomy in primary teeth (13).

Various designs of Ni-Ti rotary instruments are available in the market. Manufacturers have modified their designs to enhance the cleaning efficiency of root canal preparations, simplify the procedure, and reduce instrumentation time. Some of the commercially available paediatric rotary files include Kedo-STM, Kedo-SGTM, Kedo-SG BlueTM (India), Prime-PedoTM (India), DXL-Pro PedoTM (India), Pro AF Baby GoldTM (India), NeolixTM (France), Denco® Kids files (China), and Sani® Kid rotary files (China).

The Kedo-SG BlueTM file system has an innovative feature of the triangular cross-section with variably variable taper design (4-8%) and tip diameter, facilitating efficient root canal wall preparation. The Kedo-SG BlueTM rotary files are a single file system that includes D1, E1, and U1 files, with a total length of 16 mm and a working area (cutting flutes) of 12 mm in length (Table/Fig 1). These files are made of heat-treated NiTi with an additional titanium oxide coating formed through special thermomechanical processing, providing increased flexibility, enhanced safety, and improved resistance to cyclic fatigue, with 75% greater resistance to cyclic fatigue. This design reduces the chances of instrument fracture (14).

Another paediatric rotary system, the Prime PedoTM, consists of four files: Starter, P1, P2, and Endosonic file. The Prime PedoTM file system includes the Starter file (8% taper, 16 mm), P1 file (#15, 6% taper, 18 mm), P2 file (#25, 6% taper, 18 mm), and endodontic file (2% taper, 18 mm). The length markings on the file are as follows: 12 mm up to the flutes, 13 mm stopper above the flutes, 14 mm marker ring present, and 15 mm above this mark, with a marker ring at 16 mm (Table/Fig 1). As a result, a ruler or scale is not required to align the stopper for repeatedly setting the working length. The Prime PedoTM files have a gold treatment and controlled memory, which allows them to be centered in the curved canals of primary molars (15).

Existing literature does not provide any studies comparing the Kedo-SG BlueTM and Prime PedoTM rotary systems. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of these two rotary systems in primary molars. Hence this study was conducted to compare the instrumentation time between the rotary Kedo-SG BlueTM and Prime PedoTM filing techniques in primary molars along with the time taken for obturation with Metapex after instrumentation using either of the two rotary files and compare and analyse the quality of root canal filling with Metapex in primary molars instrumented using either of the two rotary files.

Material and Methods

This double-blinded, two-parallel-arm quantitative study with a balanced allocation of a 1:1 ratio was conducted in the outpatient Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, as well as school dental health programs conducted by Narayana Dental College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India, from February 1, 2019, to January 20, 2020. Ethical clearance was obtained from the institutional ethical committee (IEC Ref No: NDC/IECC/PEDO/DISS/12-18/02), and the trial was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry-India (CTRI) (registration number CTRI/2019/08/020947 given in August 2019). The parents or legal guardians were provided with an explanation of the clinical procedure, and informed consent was obtained from the parents of the participants before starting the procedure.

Inclusion criteria: Healthy children irrespective of race or socio-economic status, aged 4-9 years with indication of mandibular molars for pulpectomy, absence of internal or external pathological root resorption with atleast two-thirds of the root length present were included in the study by block randomisation technique.

Exclusion criteria: Those children with any systemic illness, or tooth with perforated pulpal floor, extensive mobility,furcal abscess or presence of less than two-thirds of the root were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: Based on the requirement for the randomised clinical trial, a minimum sample of 49.6 was required with 80% power and a 5% error (16). Therefore, the authors considered sample of 50 for this study.

The simple block randomised clinical trial included 50 primary mandibular molars from 50 children (25 boys and 25 girls) (Table/Fig 2). Among the 50 primary mandibular molars, there were 12 first molars and 38 second molars with carious lesions that indicated the need for pulpectomy. The teeth were divided into two groups (n=25 in each group) based on the paediatric rotary systems used.

The two groups were divided according to the interventions:

Group I: Instrumented with Kedo-SG BlueTM using a standard protocol (14).
Group II: Instrumented with Prime PedoTM using a modified protocol (13).

Procedure

A single operator performed all the procedures in a single-visit treatment, following the manufacturer’s instructions. An intraoral investigation with periapical radiographs of the indicated tooth for pulpectomy was obtained before the start of the clinical procedure. Pulpectomy was performed on the selected molars under appropriate local anaesthesia using 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline, and the tooth was isolated using a rubber dam. After assessing both subjective and objective signs of the action of local anaesthesia, a no.4 carbide bur was used to remove caries, and access opening was performed using a high-speed aerator. The pulp tissue in the pulp chamber was removed using a round bur, and the canals were located using a DG16 endodontic explorer (Hu-Friedy Mfg. Co. LLC). Pulpal tissue was then extirpated from the root canals using barbed broaches. A No.10 size K-file (Dentsply Maillefer, OK, USA) was used to check the root canal’s patency, and a No.15 K-file was placed into each canal to determine the canal length. The working length was determined using the radiographic technique, with the file positioned 1 millimeter short of the apex.

In Group I (n=25), the root canals were instrumented with Kedo-SG BlueTM rotary files using a crown-down technique with a lateral brushing motion. The canal working length was determined using a No.15 K-file. The D1 rotary file (red colour-coded, tip diameter 0.25, VV taper) was used to instrument the narrow mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canals. The E1 rotary file (blue colour-coded, tip diameter 0.30, VV taper) was used to instrument the wider distal canals to the full working length. The instrumentation was performed at a speed of 300 rpm and torque of 2.2 N.cm using the ENDO-MATE DT (NSK, Nakanishi Inc., Japan), following the manufacturer’s instructions (Reeganz Dental Care Pvt., Ltd., India).

In Group II (n=25), the root canals were instrumented with Prime PedoTM paediatric rotary files using a crown-down technique. The Kuo’s protocol (13) was modified in this study to standardise the number of rotary files used during instrumentation. The P1 file (#15, 6% taper, 18 mm) was used to instrument the narrower canals (mesiobuccal and mesiolingual), and the P2 file (#25, 6% taper, 18 mm) was used for the wider distal canals. The instrumentation was performed using the ENDO-MATE DT (NSK, Nakanishi Inc., Japan) at a rotational speed of 300 rpm and torque of 2.4 N/cm, following the manufacturer’s instructions (Sky International Enterprises, India).

During instrumentation, each file was used gently with an in-and-out brushing motion, and each canal was irrigated with 2 mL of normal saline after instrumentation in both groups. For both groups, during instrumentation, each canal was lubricated with Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA) to remove the smear layer and smoothen the canals, preventing file fracture within curved canals. A digital stopwatch was used to record the instrumentation time for each group in minutes. The timer was started, which included the total instrumentation time of the used files, excluding the time for irrigation between files, in order to assess the accurate time needed for instrumentation in each group. An operator noted the corresponding instrumentation time for each group.

After the last irrigation, the canals were dried with sterile paper points and obturated with Metapex material during the same appointment. The Metapex material was gently pushed into the canals using cotton pellets. The time taken for obturation was also recorded using the same digital stopwatch in minutes. Excess material was removed, and the coronal space was filled with conventional Glass ionomer cement.

Post-operative radiographs were taken, and an investigator and two paediatric dentists assessed the quality of obturation as optimal, underfilled, or overfilled based on the criteria established by Coll JA and Sadrian R (1996) (17). Stainless steel crowns (3M, ESPE, USA) were placed as the final restoration in all the pulpotomised teeth to prevent restoration fracture and microleakage. The crowns were placed within seven days after obturation in the second appointment, as some younger children could not tolerate long appointments. Therefore, in the second visit, all the crowns were placed in all the children to ensure a standardised procedure (Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 4).

In this study, both the participants and the assessing reviewers were blinded to the technique used. Since both rotary systems have distinguishable characteristics, they could not be confounded to the operator, thus minimising bias.

Statistical Analysis

Data were collected using predesigned case record forms and entered into Microsoft Excel sheets. Statistical analysis was conducted using independent Student’s t-test for continuous parameters and Chi-square tests for categorical parameters to determine statistical significance. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20.0 software (IBM Corp., Somers, NY, USA). A reliability analysis was conducted to assess the reliability of the observations/data by Cronbach’s alpha value and Kappa value was calculated to measure the concordance or agreement between the observations recorded by the blinded examiners.

Results

Fifty primary mandibular molars from 50 children aged between 4-9 years were included in the study. The mean age of the children was 6.8±0.8 years in the Kedo-SG BlueTM group and 6.5±1.0 years in the Prime-PedoTM group (Table/Fig 5).

The Kedo-SG BlueTM group consisted of 13 boys and 12 girls, while the Prime-PedoTM group had 12 boys and 13 girls. There was no statistically significant difference in gender distribution between the two groups (p-value=0.77) (Table/Fig 6).

When comparing the mean instrumentation time between the two groups using an independent Student’s t-test, it was found that the Kedo-SG BlueTM group had significantly less instrumentation time compared to the Prime-PedoTM group (p-value=0.009) (Table/Fig 7).

The obturation time was also found to be significantly less in the Kedo-SG BlueTM group compared to the Prime-PedoTM group (p-value <0.05) (Table/Fig 8). Regarding the quality of obturation, there was no statistically significant difference observed between the Kedo-SG BlueTM and Prime-PedoTM groups (p-value=0.486) (Table/Fig 9),(Table/Fig 10),(Table/Fig 11).

Discussion

The field of dentistry is continuously evolving with the introduction of advanced technology, allowing dental professionals to provide the best services to their patients. Each year, innovative technologies emerge in the dental field, improving patient comfort worldwide.

Root canal preparation can be performed using hand instruments such as files, reamers, drills, and rotary files. However, hand instrumentation techniques are time-consuming and can result in iatrogenic errors. As trends change, there has been a growing focus on making pulpectomy procedures more efficient and time-saving (17). Rotary instrumentation has made significant advancements in the field of endodontics, including its application in paediatric dentistry (18).

Therefore, in the present study, the authors compared the instrumentation time, obturation time, and quality of obturation using the Kedo-SG BlueTM and Prime-PedoTM rotary file systems, which are specifically designed for paediatric patients. Previous studies by Kuo CI et al., used a combination of a manual file and two ProtaperTM instruments (S.X. and S2) and concluded that the modified protocol was effective for root canal preparation in primary molars (13). Other studies have also reported clinical success in primary molars using a modified protocol with ProTaper files (13),(19),(20). In the present study, the authors modified the instrumentation protocols for the Prime-Pedo rotary systems (P1, P2) to ensure safe and efficient use of rotary files in root canal preparation for primary molars. Additionally, the authors modified Kuo’s protocol in this study to standardise the number of rotary files used during instrumentation and prevent bias when calculating the instrumentation time.

In the current study, the preparation time included both the time for instrumentation and the time required for canal irrigation. However, the time taken for changing files was excluded.

The mean instrumentation time for the Kedo-SG Blue group was 1.76±0.33, while for the Prime PedoTM group it was 2.03±0.37. The Kedo-SG Blue group had significantly less instrumentation time. The duration of instrumentation is influenced by the technique employed and the type of instruments used (14). In paediatric rotary endodontics, reducing the instrumentation time is crucial as it can positively impact a child’s behaviour and cooperation during dental treatment. It also helps to minimise operator and patient fatigue due to shorter working time and improves treatment quality (21). This finding regarding instrumentation time is consistent with the results of a study by Priyadarshini P et al., (14), who concluded that the mean instrumentation time for Kedo SG-Blue was shorter. The reduced instrumentation time in the Kedo SG-Blue group can be attributed to the file’s reduced stress due to its triangular cross-section, which minimises contact areas with dentin (22). This design provides higher flexibility and potential fatigue resistance. Increased fatigue resistance can reduce the risk of rotary file fracture in curved root canals of primary molars (23). Similar results have been reported in other studies (24),(25),(26),(27).

This study is the first to compare two paediatric rotary systems in terms of obturation time. The mean obturation time for the Kedo-SG Blue system was (1.04±0.26), which was lower than the Prime-PedoTM system (1.21±0.19). Both rotary systems demonstrated a statistically significant difference in obturation time.

These findings are in line with a study conducted by Ochoa-Romero T et al., who concluded that the use of the rotary technique in primary teeth reduced obturation time in 68% of cases (28). Similar results were also reported by Babaji P et al., and Morankar R et al., where they found that rotary files had shorter obturation times compared to manual K-Files (26),(29).

The ultimate goal of root canal treatment is to create a fluid-tight seal throughout the entire length of the root canal system, from the coronal opening to the apical termination. Therefore, the success of root canal treatment in primary teeth depends on achieving complete obturation of the canal space (29).

The quality of obturation is a critical factor in determining the success of pulpectomy (30). A higher conicity of the root canal shape allows for easier placement of the filling material and facilitates condensation. This shape also helps in retaining the material inside the canal, preventing apical extrusion of the filling material. This is crucial because clinical research studies analysing the quality of filling in pulpectomies have shown high success rates with optimally and underfilled canals, regardless of the material used. However, there is a significant decrease in success rates when overfilling occurs, irrespective of the material used. Other factors that can influence the success of treatment include previous pulp pathology and resorption (31).

In this study, the quality of obturation was assessed using the criteria established by Coll JA and Sadrian R (1996). Their study reported an overall significant success rate for teeth (incisors and molars) that were filled to the apex (89%) or filled short (87%), compared to teeth that were overfilled, which had a success rate of 58% (17). It is important to note that achieving a tight apical seal is not always possible in primary teeth after pulpectomy, even in cases where the pulpectomy is considered successful (32).

In the present study, regarding the quality of obturation, 2 (8%) teeth were overfilled, 23 (92%) teeth were optimally filled, and no teeth were underfilled in the Kedo-SG Blue group. In the Prime-PedoTM group, 19 (76%) teeth were optimally filled, 5 (20%) teeth were overfilled, and 1 (4%) tooth was underfilled. However, there was no statistically significant difference observed between the two rotary systems. The Kedo-SG Blue group showed superior quality of root canal filling. This may be attributed to the progressively increased taper, which results in higher cervical enlargement and restricted apical preparation. Additionally, the increased flexibility of the Kedo-SG Blue files aids in negotiating even the narrowest canals and adapting to the primary canal curvature. The additional titanium oxide coating of the file also contributes to a smoother flow of obturating material and optimal quality of obturation (14).

The results of this study were similar to the study conducted by Priyadarshini P et al., who reported that 80% of teeth were optimally filled, 20% were overfilled, and none were underfilled with Kedo-SG Blue (14). Similar findings were also reported in other studies (24),(26),(27),(33),(34),(35),(36).

In this study, for the prime Pedo group, 76% of teeth were optimally filled, 20% were overfilled, and 4% were underfilled. However, Ghadge S et al., reported that 3.8% were underfilled, which is consistent with the present study, while 96.2% of teeth were optimally filled and none were overfilled, which is inconsistent with this study findings. (37) This discrepancy can be attributed to variations in operator skill, irrigating solution, and the type of obturating material used. Similar studies from the literature have been compared in (Table/Fig 12) (14),(15),(30),(38),(39).

The Prime PedoTM group exhibited the highest number of overfilled canals compared to the Kedo-SG BlueTM group. This difference may be attributed to variations in working length, as well as the gradual taper design of each file. It is important to note that when working with rotary files, exceeding the working length should be avoided due to their conicity.

Calcium hydroxide-based obturating materials possess beneficial properties such as bio-absorbability, anti-bacterial activity, induction of mineralised tissue formation, activation of alkaline phosphatase, collagen synthesis, and the ability to hydrolyse bacterial endotoxin (36),(40),(41),(42). Additionally, iodoform-based materials resorb within two weeks if pushed beyond the apex, and their rate of resorption is faster than that of the root (43). Therefore, in the present study, although the Prime PedoTM group had more overfilled canals than the Kedo-SG BlueTM group, it does not hinder the eruption of permanent teeth or cause any foreign body reaction.

Paediatric patients often have limited mouth opening, making it challenging to use longer instruments. To address this issue, paediatric rotary files were specifically designed with shorter lengths. These files offer several advantages when working with paediatric patients, including ease of operation, reduced chairside time, improved debris and tissue removal, increased patient cooperation, and effective cleaning and shaping of canals.

It is important to note that the procedure is technique-sensitive and relies on the experience of the operator and cooperation of the child. Therefore, caution should be exercised when generalising the results obtained with these rotary instruments to clinical practice.

Limitation(s)

The quality of obturation was assessed using 2D radiographs. However, the quality of obturation can be better evaluated using three-dimensional imaging. It is important to assess the clinical and radiographic success of pulpectomy procedures performed with different file systems through long-term follow-up.

Conclusion

The instrumentation time was shorter for the Kedo-SG BlueTM rotary system compared to the Prime-PedoTM rotary system. Similarly, the obturation time was shorter for the Kedo-SG BlueTM rotary system than the Prime-PedoTM rotary system. The Kedo-SG BlueTM rotary system exhibited the highest number of optimally filled canals, indicating that the cleaning efficacy of Kedo-SG BlueTM files was superior to that of Prime-PedoTM files. Therefore, based on this study, the Kedo-SG BlueTM paediatric rotary file system can be recommended for use in primary teeth to enhance root canal preparation and achieve good quality root canal filling.

References

1.
Rotstein I, Ingle JI. Ingle’s Endodontics 7 th edition, PMPH, USA. (Pp.832).
2.
AAPD. Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2009;34:12-13. https://www.aapd.org/media/Policies_Guidelines/ BP_PulpTherapy.pdf.
3.
Primosch RE, Ahmadi A, Setzer B, Guelmann M. A retrospective assessment of zinc oxide-eugenol pulpectomies in vital maxillary primary incisors successfully restored with composite resin crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2005;27(6):470-77.
4.
Fuks AB. Current concepts in vital primary pulp therapy. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2002;3(3):115-20.
5.
Takahashi K. Microbiological, pathological, inflammatory, immunological and molecular biological aspects of periradicular disease. Int Endod J. 1998;31(5):311-25. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Shuping GB, Ørstavik D, Sigurdsson A, Trope M. Reduction of intracanal bacteria using nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation and various medications. J Endod. 2000;26(12):751-55. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Pinheiro SL, Araujo G, Bincelli I, Cunha R, Bueno C. Evaluation of cleaning capacity and instrumentation time of manual, hybrid and rotary instrumentation techniques in primary molars. Int Endod J. 2012;45(4):379-85. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Short JA, Morgan LA, Baumgartner JC. A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation techniques. J Endod. 1997;23(8):503-07. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Gergi R, Rjeily JA, Sader J, Naaman A. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of twisted files, Pathfile-ProTaper system, and stainless steel hand K-files by using computed tomography. J Endod. 2010;36(5):904-07. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Johnson E, Lloyd A, Kuttler S, Namerow K. Comparison between a novel nickel- titanium alloy and 508 nitinol on the cyclic fatigue life of Profile 25/.04 rotary instruments. J Endod. 2008;34(11):1406-09. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Barr ES, Kleier DJ, Barr NV. Use of nickel-titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22(1):77-78.
12.
Siqueira JF Jr, Araújo MC, Garcia PF, Fraga RC, Dantas CJ. Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of root canals. J Endod. 1997;23(8):499-502. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Kuo CI, Wang YL, Chang HH, Huang GF, Lin CP, Li UM, et al. Application of Ni-Ti rotary files for pulpectomy in primary molars. J Dent Sci. 2006;1:10-15. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Application-of-Ni-Ti-Rotary-Files-for- Pulpectomy-in-Kuo-Wang/a3be85d9dbfacfebb870f3fe037d88c2ee9948fe.
14.
Priyadarshini P, Jeevanandan G, Govindaraju L, Subramanian EM. Clinical evaluation of instrumentation time and quality of obturation using paediatric hand and rotary file systems with conventional hand K-files for pulpectomy in primary mandibular molars: A double-blinded randomised controlled trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020;21(6):693-701. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Katge F, Ghadge S, Poojari M, Jain K, Patil DP. Comparative evaluation of cleaning efficacy of Prime Pedo™ and DXL-Pro™ Pedo Rotary Files with Conventional H files in root canals of primary teeth: An in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2019;13(7):06-09. [crossref]
16.
Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research? Indian J Psychol Med. 2013;35(2):121-26. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Coll JA, Sadrian R. Predicting pulpectomy success and its relationship to exfoliation and succedaneous dentition. Pediatr Dent. 1996;18(1):57-63.
18.
Moghaddam KN, Mehran M, Zadeh HF. Root canal cleaning efficacy of rotary and hand files instrumentation in primary molars. Iran Endod J. 2009;4(2):53-57.
19.
Finn SB. Morphology of the primary teeth. Clinical pedodontics. 1973;4:59-70.
20.
Govindaraju L, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian EM. Knowledge and practice of rotary instrumentation in primary teeth among Indian dentists: A questionnaire survey. J Int Oral Health. 2017;9(2):45. [crossref]
21.
Mortazavi M, Abbasi A, Khodadadi E. Comparison of canal cleansing time and pulpectomy success rate in deciduous molars by use of hand and rotary files. Dental Journal of Shiraz University of Medical Science. 2006;2:111-19.
22.
Musale PK, Mujawar SA. Evaluation of the efficacy of rotary vs. Hand in root canal preparation of primary teeth in vitro using CBCT. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2014;15(2):113-20. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Versluis A, Kim HC, Lee W, Kim BM, Lee CJ. Flexural stiffness and stresses in nickel-titanium rotary files for various pitch and cross-sectional geometries. J Endod. 2012;38(10):1399-403. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
de Arruda Santos L, de Azevedo Bahia MG, de Las Casas EB, Buono VT. Comparison of the mechanical behavior between controlled memory and super elastic nickel-titanium files via finite element analysis. J Endod. 2013;39(11):1444-47. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Jeevanandan G, Govindaraju L. Clinical comparison of Kedo-S paediatric rotary files vs manual instrumentation for root canal preparation in primary molars: A double blinded randomised clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018;19(4):273-78. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Babaji P, Mehta V, Manjooran T. Clinical evaluation of rotary system over manual system in deciduous molars: A clinical trial. Int J Pedod Rehabil. 2019;4(1):13-16. [crossref]
27.
Panchal V, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian EM. Comparison of instrumentation time and obturation quality between hand K-file, H-files, and rotary Kedo-S in root canal treatment of primary teeth: A randomised controlled trial. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dentistry. 2019;37(1):75-79. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Ochoa-Romero T, Mendez-Gonzalez V, Flores-Reyes H, Pozos-Guillen AJ. Comparison between rotary and manual techniques on duration of instrumentation and obturation times in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011;35(4):359-63. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Morankar R, Goyal A, Gauba K, Kapur A, Bhatia SK. Manual versus rotary instrumentation for primary molar pulpectomies-A 24 months randomised clinical trial. Pediatr Dent J. 2018;28(2):96-02. [crossref]
30.
Lakshmanan L, Mani G, Jeevanandan G, Ravindran V, Ganapathi SE. Assessing the quality of root canal filling and instrumentation time using Kedo-s files, reciprocating files and k-files. Braz Dent Sci. 2020;23(1):01-07. [crossref]
31.
Chonat A, Rajamani T, Ephraim R. Obturating Materials in Primary Teeth-A Review. Research & Reviews: Journal of Dental Sciences. 2018;6(1):20-25.
32.
Ranly DM, Garcia-Godoy F. Current and potential pulp therapies for primary and young permanent teeth. J Dent. 2000;28(3):153-61. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Crespo S, Cortes O, Garcia C, Perez L. Comparison between rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2008;32(4):295-98. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Sunitha B, Kiran KP, Puppala R, Kethineni B, Ravigna, Dandotikar DR. Resorption of extruded obturating material in primary teeth. Ind J Med Allied Sci. 2014;2(1):64-67. [crossref]
35.
Divya S, Jeevanandan G, Sujatha S, Subramanian EMG, Ravindran V. Comparison of quality of obturation and post-operative pain using manual vs rotary files in primary teeth-A randomised clinical trial. Indian J Dent Res. 2019;30(6):904-08. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Juliet S, Jeevanandan G, Govindaraju L, Ravindran V, Subramanian EM. Comparison between three rotary files on quality of obturation and instrumentation time in primary teeth-a double blinded randomized controlled trial. J Orofac Sci. 2020;12:30-34. [crossref]
37.
Ghadge S, Katge F, Poojari M, Jain K, Patil D. Clinical evaluation and comparison of obturation quality using pediatric rotary file, rotary endodontic file and H file in root canal of primary molars: A double blinded randomized controlled trial. Int J Res Rep Dent. 2020;3(4):12-19.
38.
Ramezanali F, Afkhami F, Soleimani A, Kharrazifard MJ, Rafiee F. Comparison of cleaning efficacy and instrumentation time in primary molars: Two rotary instruments vs. Hand K-Files. Iran Endod J. 2015;10(4):240-43.
39.
Ramazani N, Mohammadi A, Amirabadi F, Ramazani M, Ehsani F. In vitro investigation of the cleaning efficacy, shaping ability, preparation time and file deformation of continuous rotary, reciprocating rotary and manual instrumentations in primary molars. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2016;10(1):49-56. [crossref][PubMed]
40.
Gupta S, Das G. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of zinc oxide eugenol and metapex in root canal treatment of primary teeth. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011;29(3):222-28. [crossref][PubMed]
41.
Fuks AB, Papagiannoulis L. Pulpotomy in primary teeth: Review of the literature according to standardised criteria. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006;7(2):64-71. [crossref][PubMed]
42.
Rifkin A. The root canal treatment of abscessed primary teeth-A three to four year follow-up. ASDC J Dent Child. 1982;49(6):428-31.
43.
Garcia-Godoy F. Evaluation of an iodoform paste in root canal therapy for infected primary teeth. ASDC J Dent Child. 1987;54(1):30-34.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/63534.18917

Date of Submission: Feb 17, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Apr 28, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Sep 20, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 04, 2023
• Manual Googling: May 04, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Sep 16, 2023 (19%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com