Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 41350

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2024 | Month : January | Volume : 18 | Issue : 1 | Page : TR01 - TR05 Full Version

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Spinal Bone Marrow Signal Alterations with Emphasis on Pattern Recognition: A Case Series


Published: January 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/68552.18938
Chandrasekhar Patil, Bharath Shekarapa Gadagoli, Naini Manender Reddy, Sree Sreya Chinnapolla, Prashanth Kumar

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, Malla Reddy Medical College for Women, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Subbaiah Institute of Medical Sciences, Shimoga, Karnataka, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, Malla Reddy Medical College for Women, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. 4. Junior Resident, Department of Radiology, Malla Reddy Medical College for Women, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. 5. Professor, Department of Radiology, Malla Reddy Medical College for Women, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Sree Sreya Chinnapolla,
Junior Resident, Department of Radiology, Malla Reddy Medical College for Women, Hyderabad-500055, Telangana, India.
E-mail: sreyachowdary96@gmail.com

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive imaging modality available to detect bone marrow oedema. Different pathological conditions of the spine exhibit distinct and specific bone marrow oedema patterns or signal characteristics. Understanding these patterns for various types of bone marrow oedema in the spine, such as degenerative and pathological conditions, helps to prevent unnecessary investigations and further work-up. In this article, authors detail the specific imaging characteristics of benign versus malignant or pathological fractures, tuberculosis and non tubercular infections of the spine, as well as the imaging appearance of multiple myeloma, among others. Therefore, this article mainly emphasises the approach to bone marrow oedema detected in the spine, aiding in reaching the correct diagnosis and guiding proper management.

Keywords

Metastasis, Multiple myeloma, Spondylodisctis

Back pain is the most common presenting symptom in most spinal conditions, and MRI is an effective diagnostic tool for evaluating back pain. MRI is highly sensitive in detecting early marrow oedema long before morphological changes occur in bone, and it is radiation-free. Another primary imaging modality for evaluation of back pain is X-ray, but it has several disadvantages, such as radiation exposure, low resolution-especially in obese patients-and the inability to be reformatted. One advantage of X-ray is its ready availability, especially in peripheral areas, and it can be used as a primary screening modality in the evaluation of back pain. Plain Computed Tomography (CT) scan is useful as an adjunct to MRI in conditions like polytrauma, particularly in the better evaluation of bone fractures with its multiplanar reconstruction. Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) scan, Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT), and nuclear scintigraphy all carry the risk of radiation exposure and require the use of exogenous contrast material/radionuclide injection. Therefore, these imaging modalities cannot be used in pregnant women, paediatric patients, and those with chronic renal disease. The most common conditions causing back pain include degenerative diseases of the spine, benign conditions, inflammatory or infective spondylodiscitis, and benign fractures. Metastasis, primary bone tumours, multiple myeloma, etc., are other spinal diseases that can cause back pain, often accompanied by other symptoms.

Bone marrow is responsible for normal haematopoiesis and accounts for approximately 5% of body weight in an adult human (1),(2). The function of bone marrow is to provide different blood cell lineages involved in tissue nutrition, oxygenation, and the body’s immune reactions (3). The bone marrow mainly contains stem cells responsible for producing erythrocytes, granulocytes, monocytes, lymphocytes, and platelets, and contains supportive cells such as macrophages, adipocytes, osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and adventitial reticular cells, which provide nutrients and cytokines for the proliferation, differentiation, and maturation of haematopoietic cells (2). These cellular elements are enmeshed within the medullary bony trabeculae, which act as a supporting structure and store calcium and phosphate. There are two types of bone marrow in the spine: red marrow (Table/Fig 1)a,b and yellow marrow (Table/Fig 1)c. The red marrow is named for its richness in haemoglobin in the erythrocyte lineage and is richly vascular, while the yellow marrow, named for its abundant carotenoid bodies in its fat cells, is scarcely vascular (3). The nutrition of spinal marrow is derived mainly from the ambient sinusoids branching from nutrient vessels piercing the vertebral cortices and drained via Batson’s venous plexus. Bone marrow is a dynamic organ with continued changes occurring throughout the life with increased age and increased haematopoietic demands in different health and pathological states (4),(5). These changes in marrow composition contribute to the altered signal characteristics on different MRI sequences. Understanding these signal changes of bone marrow in MRI is key to diagnosing different disease conditions.

Most commonly, marrow signal changes seen in routine MRI are the degenerative end plate changes (Table/Fig 2)a-d. These are classified as Modic type I (oedema), in which the end plate is T1 hypointense and T2 hyperintense, Modic Type II (fatty), in which the end plate is hyperintense on both T1 and T2, and finally Modic type III (sclerosis) (6).

Case Report

Case 1

A 39-year-old male patient presented with complaints of a fall from a height one day prior, followed by difficulty in walking and back pain since then. There was no evidence of vomiting, headache, or loss of consciousness. Upon general examination, the patient was conscious, coherent, and cooperative, and vitals were stable. Clinical examination revealed paraspinal tenderness noted at the L3-L4 level. The patient was advised MRI lumbar spine screening, which revealed a hypointense horizontal line with subtle marrow oedema involving the L1 vertebra, with a slight decrease in vertebral body height, suggestive of a traumatic compression fracture (Table/Fig 3). Based on the imaging, the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) (7) was given as one. Consequently, the patient was treated conservatively with rest and analgesic medications.

Below are two companion cases demonstrating the imaging features of benign and insufficiency fractures (Table/Fig 4),(Table/Fig 5).

Case 2

A 64-year-old male patient presented with complaints of a sudden fall while walking, followed by weakness of both lower limbs for 15-20 days, along with associated fever, malaise, shortness of breath, and loss of appetite. There was no evidence of bladder or bowel disturbances. Upon general examination, the patient was conscious, 2

coherent, and had stable vitals. Neurological examination revealed a decrease in sensation of the left lower limb with a power of 4/5 in both lower limbs. The patient was admitted for further evaluation. Routine blood investigations revealed mild leucopenia, raised Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), and raised C-Reactive Protein (CRP), indicating a suspicion of an infective aetiology. The patient was then referred for an MRI of the dorsal spine, which revealed marrow oedema of the D7 and D8 vertebrae, with thick irregular exudative enhancement seen in the subarachnoid space around the cord at the D7-D8 level, extending into the neural foramina on either side, causing focal bilateral moderate cord compression at this level (Table/Fig 6)a-d. There was cord oedema at the D7-D8 level. Additionally, there was mild enhancement of the subarachnoid space around the cord, extending from D8 to the conus medullaris. Imaging features were suggestive of infective spondylitis, with the possibility of Brucellosis or Tuberculosis, with sparing of the D7-D8 intervertebral disc. Subsequently, a CT-guided biopsy of the D7 vertebra was performed, and the tissue sample was sent for Tuberculosis Polymerase Chain Reaction (TB-PCR) and Brucella antibodies, from which the Brucella IgG antibody tested positive. The patient was started on tab doxycycline and rifampicin for Brucella infection, and the patient showed clinical improvement in the symptoms on follow-up visits.

Case 3

A 39-year-old male patient presented with complaints of neck pain, sore throat, fever, and difficulty in swallowing for three months, as well as tingling and numbness in his right upper and lower limbs for the last four days. Upon examination, the patient was conscious, coherent, and cooperative, and his vitals were stable. Clinical examination revealed a bulge and congestion in the pharynx and a few palpable lymph nodes in the neck. The patient was admitted for further evaluation, and all necessary investigations were conducted. Blood investigations showed an elevated Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) and a decrease in lymphocyte count. The patient was advised to undergo an MRI of the cervicodorsal spine, which revealed a large retropharyngeal abscess complicated by a cervical spine epidural abscess, spondylodiscitis, and cervical compressive myelopathy at the C5-C6 level (Table/Fig 7)a-d. The rest of the spine was unremarkable. Imaging features were suggestive of a tubercular aetiology. The retropharyngeal abscess was drained transorally, and the sample was sent for culture and histology. The culture was positive for tubercular bacilli. The screening chest was unremarkable. The patient was then put on antitubercular therapy for 6-9 months. On follow-up visits, the patient showed clinical improvement.

Case 4

A 63-year-old male patient presented with complaints of being unable to walk, weakness in both legs, and pain in bilateral lower limbs for 15 days. There was no history of fever, vomiting, or loss of consciousness. The patient had a history of multiple myeloma. Upon general examination, the patient was conscious and coherent, and vitals were stable. Based on previous imaging and other investigations, the patient was diagnosed with multiple myeloma involving the D2-D4 thoracic spine, for which he underwent D2-D4 decompressive laminectomy. On follow-up visits postsurgery, a plain and contrast MRI of the dorsal spine was advised, which showed multilevel heterogeneous patchy and discrete altered marrow signal intensities with variable postcontrast enhancement seen involving almost the entire spine, including the posterior bony elements and bilateral ribs (Table/Fig 8)a-d. The imaging features were suggestive of progression of multiple myeloma. The patient was discharged with a prescription of Tab Pantocid, Tab Linezolid, Tab Enzoheal, Tab Rejyunex Cd3, and 1 Tab Dical-D. On a further one-month follow-up visit, the patient was advised to undergo a repeat follow-up MRI, which revealed newly developed bulky soft-tissue lesions involving the bilateral pedicles and transverse process of the D3 vertebra, suggestive of new onset lesions. At present, the patient is undergoing radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

Case 5

A 30-year-old male patient presented with complaints of lower backache for 25 days, which he experienced while riding a bike, as well as swelling on the left-side of the neck. Upon general examination, the patient was conscious and coherent, and his vitals were stable. Clinical examination revealed tenderness in the paraspinal muscles, with no evidence of focal neurological deficits. The patient was admitted for primary evaluation and supportive management, and all necessary investigations were conducted. The MRI of the dorsal spine revealed multilevel ill-defined lesions with patchy marrow oedema in the dorsal vertebrae, along with an anterior wedge compression fracture of the D11 vertebra (resulting in a 50-60% decreased body height) (Table/Fig 9)a-d. In addition, the posterior bony elements of the D5, D9, and D11 vertebrae were also involved. A few enlarged para-aortic lymph nodes were also noted in the scan. Based on these findings, the diagnosis of spinal metastasis was made. To determine the primary site, a PET-CT scan was performed, which revealed multiple bony and liver metastases, with a suspected primary site in the stomach. An endoscopy-guided biopsy from the stomach confirmed adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) of the supraclavicular lymph nodal swelling revealed adenocarcinoma metastasis. Emergency radiation to the dorsal spine was advised, but the patient refused, and he was discharged with a prescription of Tab dexamethasone 8 mg (1 tablet BD), Tab morphine plain 10 mg (1 tablet 6 times daily), Tab gabanet at bedtime, and Tab ondansetron 8 mg (1 tablet BD). On follow-up, the patient succumbed to the disease within one month.

Case 6

A 40-year-old female patient presented with a chronic history of easy fatigue, back pain, decreased appetite, and weight loss for 7-8 months. On physical examination, she exhibited severe pallor, mild glossitis, and a bounding pulse with borderline blood pressure of 160/90. She was advised to undergo routine blood investigations and an MRI of the lumbar spine to evaluate her back pain. The lab reports revealed a low haemoglobin level of 6 g/dL and mild vitamin B12 deficiency. The cause of her anaemia was found to be nutritional anaemia. The MRI of the lumbar spine revealed haematopoietic marrow hyperplasia due to chronic severe anaemia (Table/Fig 10)a,b, with no evidence of significant disc bulges or nerve root compression noted on the MRI scan. She was prescribed vitamin B12 and iron tablet supplements and advised to follow a proper nutritional diet. On follow-up, the patient’s symptoms had improved.

Discussion

The abnormal marrow in the spine can exhibit different patterns and signal characteristics. This article mainly focuses on describing these various pathological marrow conditions in different clinical contexts, thereby helping to narrow the differential diagnosis. Routinely, MRI T1, T2 weighted, and fat suppression sequences were used to assess the marrow abnormalities. Diffusion Weighted Image (DWI) is useful in differentiating osteoporotic versus neoplastic vertebral fractures (8), in differentiating infective versus degenerative endplate changes (9), and in the follow-up of neoplastic vertebral lesions (10). The role of DWI is controversial in studying the bone marrow, and however, it should be interpreted in line with other native sequences (11),(12).

The very common signal changes that radiologists observe on routine MRI spine images include red marrow, which is highly vascular, yellow marrow, which is fatty, fatty nodular hyperplasia, islands of red marrow hyperplasia, haemangiomas, enostosis, and so on. (Table/Fig 11) briefly describes the signal characteristics of these different conditions on different MRI sequences.

Marrow signal alterations can be diffuse, involving most or the entire spine, as in multiple myeloma, myelofibrosis, marrow reconversion states as in chronic anaemia, leukaemia, and metabolic diseases, or focal, limited to one vertebra or one vertebral segment, as in the case of solitary metastasis, infective spondylodiscitis, primary vertebral tumours like giant cell tumour.

Haematopoietic red marrow hyperplasia can pose a diagnostic dilemma sometimes, but most often the Signal Intensity (SI) on T1 is not lower than the adjacent disc/muscle.

One of the most commonly seen lesions on routine MRI spine are haemangiomas. Typical haemangiomas are bright on T1 and T2W images (Table/Fig 12), and on STIR images, they may show signal suppression or sometimes show high-SI on STIR due to slow flow in vascular channels (13). Its benign nature is ascertained by corresponding high-SI on T1W images due to its abundant fat content. Metastases show cortical destruction more often than haematopoietic malignancies (14).

Traumatic or Benign Fractures

Traumatic fractures are usually wedge compression fractures or burst fractures with marrow oedema in the case of acute trauma, or associated cord injury depending on the type and severity of the fracture, with or without paraspinal haemorrhage or collection. On MRI, benign fractures from malignant fractures can be readily differentiated based on the fact that benign fractures will have a low SI fracture line that is parallel to vertebral end plates. On the other hand, malignant fractures show diffuse vertebral body marrow oedema, convex bulging of the posterior cortex, an absent fracture line, marrow oedema involving pedicles, with or without an associated paraspinal soft-tissue component (15).

Tuberculosis of Spine

One of the most common infections of the spine in India is tubercular spondylodiscitis. There are three main patterns of spine involvement in tuberculosis: paradiskal, anterior, and central (16). Jung NY et al., found that MRI showed a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 80%, and an accuracy of 90% in diagnosing TB when compared to pyogenic infection (17). Their most indicative signs of vertebral TB were: well-defined paraspinal abnormal signal, thin and smooth abscess wall, combination of both findings, presence of soft-tissue or intraosseous abscess, subligamentous spread to three or more vertebral levels, involvement of multiple vertebral bodies, thoracic spine localisation.

Brucellosis of Spine

Brucellosis needs to be differentiated from tuberculosis because both require different management and have different prognoses. Commonly, brucellosis involves vertebral end plates, adjacent vertebrae, with minor bone destruction (18), sparing vertebral morphology. It usually doesn’t affect the posterior elements, and paravertebral or psoas abscesses are rare. Additionally, disc spaces are spared early in the disease. In present case, most of these features described for spinal brucellosis were present, making it a classical case of brucellosis.

Multiple Myeloma

There are five different types of marrow signal changes described in multiple myeloma. The first type is that of normal marrow. The second pattern is focal infiltration, which appears as focal hypointense on T1, and focal hyperintense on T2/STIR images. The third pattern is diffuse bone marrow infiltration, which appears as a homogeneous hypointense T1 signal, and a homogeneous hyperintense T2/STIR signal. The fourth pattern is combined focal and diffuse infiltration, which appears as a diffuse hypointense T1 signal, interspersed with focal hyperintense T2/STIR lesions. The last pattern is the typical “salt-and-pepper” infiltration, which appears as patchy, inhomogeneous T1 and T2 signal (19). In present case of multiple myeloma, the fourth pattern was observed, which is focal and diffuse. (Table/Fig 13) briefs the different patterns of spinal marrow changes in different pathological conditions and helps narrow the differentials.

Conclusion

The MRI spine is the most preferred imaging modality for the evaluation of back pain, which is the most common presenting symptom in most spinal pathologies. Knowledge of marrow signal alterations on MRI in different age groups and different disease conditions is very important for differentiating normal marrow from abnormal and further distinguishing among abnormal pathological conditions. This article describes the appearance of normal marrow signal changes on different MRI sequences with age and details the salient features of different pathological conditions.

References

1.
Vogler 3rd JB, Murphy WA. Bone marrow imaging. Radiology. 1988;168(3):679-93. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Travlos GS. Normal structure, function, and histology of the bone marrow. Toxicologic Pathology. 2006;34(5):548-65. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Riley RS, Williams D, Ross M, Zhao S, Chesney A, Clark BD, et al. Bone marrow aspirate and biopsy: A pathologist’s perspective. II. interpretation of the bone marrow aspirate and biopsy. J Clin Lab Anal. 2009;23(5):259-307. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Strong PN, Goerke J, Oberg SG, Kelly RB. Beta-Bungarotoxin, a pre-synaptic toxin with enzymatic activity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1976;73(1):178-82. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Vande Berg BC, Malghem J, Lecouvet FE, Maldague B. Magnetic resonance imaging of the normal bone marrow. Skeletal RADIOLOGY. 1998;27:471-83. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Modic MT, Steinberg PM, Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Carter JR. Degenerative disk disease: Assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging. Radiology. 1988;166(1):193-99. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Vaccaro AR, Lehman Jr RA, Hurlbert RJ, Anderson PA, Harris M, Hedlund R, et al. A new classification of thoracolumbar injuries: The importance of injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurologic status. Spine. 2005;30(20):2325-33. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Karchevsky M, Babb JS, Schweitzer ME. Can diffusion-weighted imaging be used to differentiate benign from pathologic fractures? A meta-analysis. Skeletal radiology. 2008;37:791-95. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Eguchi Y, Ohtori S, Yamashita M, Yamauchi K, Suzuki M, Orita S, et al. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging to differentiate degenerative from infectious endplate abnormalities in the lumbar spine. Spine. 2011;36(3):E198-202. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Padhani AR, Koh DM, Collins DJ. Whole-body diffusion-weighted MR imaging in cancer: Current status and research directions. Radiology. 2011;261(3):700-18. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Baur A, Huber A, Dürr HR, Nikolaou K, Stäbler A, Deimling M, et al. Differentiation of benign osteoporotic and neoplastic vertebral compression fractures with a diffusion-weighted, steady-state free precession sequence. RoFo: Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. 2002;174(1):70-75. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Castillo M, Arbelaez A, Smith JK, Fisher LL. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging offers no advantage over routine noncontrast MR imaging in the detection of vertebral metastases. Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21(5):948-53.
13.
Baudrez V, Galant C, Vande Berg BC. Benign vertebral hemangioma: MR-histological correlation. Skeletal Radiology. 2001;30:442-46. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Parfitt AM. The hyperparathyroidism of chronic renal failure: A disorder of growth. Kidney International. 1997;52(1):03-09. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Jung HS, Jee WH, McCauley TR, Ha KY, Choi KH. Discrimination of metastatic from acute osteoporotic compression spinal fractures with MR imaging. Radiographics. 2003;23(1):179-87. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Weinstein SL. The Pediatric spine principles and practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.
17.
Jung NY, Jee WH, Ha KY, Park CK, Byun JY. Discrimination of tuberculous spondylitis from pyogenic spondylitis on MRI. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(6):1405-10. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Erdem H, Elaldi N, Batirel A, Aliyu S, Sengoz G, Pehlivanoglu F, et al. Comparison of brucellar and tuberculous spondylodiscitis patients: Results of the multicenter “Backbone-1 Study”. The Spine Journal. 2015;15(12):2509-17. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Dutoit JC, Verstraete KL. Whole-body MRI, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and diffusion-weighted imaging for the staging of multiple myeloma. Skeletal Radiology. 2017;46:733-50. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Yuh WT, Zachar CK, Barloon TJ, Sato Y, Sickels WJ, Hawes DR. Vertebral compression fractures: Distinction between benign and malignant causes with MR imaging. Radiology. 1989;172(1):215-18. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Park GE, Jee WH, Lee SY, Sung JK, Jung JY, Grimm R, et al. Differentiation of multiple myeloma and metastases: Use of axial diffusion-weighted MR imaging in addition to standard MR imaging at 3T. PLoS One. 2018;13(12):e0208860.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/68552.18938

Date of Submission: Nov 08, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Dec 08, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Dec 20, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 11, 2023
• Manual Googling: Dec 19, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Dec 20, 2023 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 5

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com