Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 47809

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : January | Volume : 18 | Issue : 1 | Page : SC01 - SC05 Full Version

Oral Daily Iron Supplementation among Rural Children Aged 36-59 Months with Mild-to-moderate Anaemia: A Quasi-experimental Study from Central Karnataka, India


Published: January 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/66337.18914
Shubha Davalagi, Anurupa Maganalli, Muganagowda Patil, Vaman Nayak

1. Associate Professor, Department of Community Medicine, JJM Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka, India. ORCID: 0000-0002-8674-9965. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Community Medicine, JJM Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka, India. 3. Professor and Head, Department of Paediatrics, JJM Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka, India. 4. Senior Resident, Department of Community Medicine, AJ Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Shubha Davalagi,
Associate Professor, Department of Community Medicine, JJM Medical College, Davangere-577004, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: shubhadavalagi@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Anaemia is a serious concern for young children because it can result in impaired cognitive performance, behavioural and motor development, coordination, language development, and scholastic achievement, as well as increased morbidity from infectious diseases. While severe anaemia is typically addressed with urgency, mild-to-moderate anaemia is sometimes overlooked. However, even mild cases can have a significant impact on a child’s health and development. Thus, oral iron supplementation, by reducing anaemia, can contribute to the development of a healthier and more productive population.

Aim: To assess the effect of daily Iron Folic Acid (IFA) supplementation among 36-59 month old children with mild-to-moderate anaemia.

Materials and Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted in the rural field practice areas of a tertiary care teaching hospital in central Karnataka, India from March 2022 to February 2023. After baseline assessment, 53 children aged between 36-59 months old in Anganwadi centres of the study area with mild-to-moderate anaemia (Haemoglobin - Hb: 10.9 – 7 g/dL) were recruited for the study after obtaining informed written consent from the parents. The IFA supplementation was administered under supervision for six months. The primary outcome was rise in the Hb concentration. The paired t-test was used to statistically analyse the data.

Results: Among the 53 study participants, the majority (27, 51%) were boys, and the mean age of the study participants was 46.6±8.4 months. The study showed that after six months of iron supplementation among 36-59 month old children with mild-to-moderate anaemia, there was a rise in the mean {Standard Deviation (±SD)} Hb by 0.71±0.32 gm/dL in the study participants, and it was found to be statistically significant (2.579, p=0.011). The increase in Hb was found in both girls (0.84±0.41 gm/dL) and boys (0.83±0.39 gm/dL).

Conclusion: The study concluded that supervised intervention for mild-to-moderate anaemia in preschool children has the potential to reduce the prevalence of iron deficiency anaemia among this vulnerable population, but it requires a joint effort from all stakeholders involved.

Keywords

Development, Early childhood, Elemental iron, Folic acid, Growth, Haemoglobin

Anaemia is a condition where the Haemoglobin (Hb) concentration or red blood cell count is below the prescribed cut-off value (1). If the body has abnormally low levels of red blood cells or insufficient Hb, the blood’s ability to deliver oxygen to the body’s tissues will be decreased. Worldwide, a total of 1.6 billion individuals suffer from anaemia, with 47.4% of them being preschoolers (2).

To effectively manage this problem, it is essential to address the root causes of anaemia in a multifaceted manner (3),(4),(5). This includes increasing knowledge and education about anaemia and nutrition, promoting access to nutrient-dense food, bolstering the healthcare system, and tackling socio-economic inequities (6),(7),(8). It also includes improving the implementation and coverage of iron and folic acid supplementation programs. Cooperation between the government, medical experts, community organisations, and other stakeholders is crucial in significantly reducing the prevalence of anaemia in India (9),(10),(11).

The recently released National Family Health Survey (NFHS 5) data shows an increase in the incidence of anaemia in under-5 children in India from 58.6% (NFHS 4) to 67%, and in Karnataka from 60.9% (NFHS 4) to 65.5% (12),(13). Iron deficiency typically starts manifesting around the age of six months, coinciding with the depletion of iron stores and the introduction of complementary foods. Many developing countries recommend iron supplementation for pregnant women and young infants (14),(15),(16),(17). The anaemia management protocol for children, as per the Government of India’s Anaemia Mukth Bharath Abhiyan guidelines, recommends daily administration of 3 mg of iron/kg/day for two months among children aged 36-59 months (2 mL IFA syrup once a day) (18).

A study assessing the effectiveness of iron supplementation in improving Hb levels among children with anaemia can provide evidence of whether supplementation is a viable strategy for addressing this issue. With this background, the present study was undertaken to assess the feasibility, acceptance, and effectiveness of daily oral iron supplementation in reducing mild-moderate anaemia among children aged 36-59 months in rural areas of central Karnataka, India.

Material and Methods

A quasi-experimental study was conducted in the rural field practice area of JJM Medical College, a tertiary care teaching hospital in central Karnataka, India, for one year from March 2022 to February 2023. The study was initiated after receiving approval from the Institutional Ethical Committee (Reference No.: JJMMC/IEC-11-2022) prior to the study’s commencement. Study participants were recruited after obtaining informed written consent from the parents.

Inclusion criteria: Children aged between 36-59 months with mild-to-moderate anaemia (Hb: 7-10.9 g/dL) (19), residing in the rural field practice area, and whose parents consented to their children’s Hb estimation and intervention were included.

Exclusion criteria: Children with any chronic illness and a history of regular consumption of IFA tablets in the past three months were excluded from the study.

Sample size: The study setting included three villages with an approximate population of 9,300 as per the 2011 census (20). The study population comprised all 281 children aged 36-59 months registered in the 10 anganwadi centres of the three villages covered under the rural field practice area.

Study Procedure

The study was conducted in stages as described below:

Stage 1: Community engagement

During the preinitiation stage, various stakeholders in the public health sector and the community were engaged using a participatory approach to understand their perceptions towards preventing anaemia in children. These stakeholders included medical officers in charge of Primary Health Centres in the three villages, Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs), Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs), Community Development Project Officers (CDPOs), Anganwadi Teachers (AWTs), village panchayat members, village leaders, and parents/primary caregivers of children aged 36-59 months.

Stage 2: Identification of children with mild-to-moderate anaemia

The rural field practice area of the tertiary care teaching hospital provides services to three villages comprising 2,660 households and a population of 9,300. Children aged 36-59 months were screened for anaemia at anganwadi centres in a phased manner.

A situational analysis was conducted in phases to understand the anaemia status of children aged 36-59 months. The selection criterion was children with mild-to-moderate anaemia (Hb: 7-10.9 g/dL) (19). All children in the age group 36-59 months were line-listed anganwadi-wise in the study area. Blood samples were collected from the children at the designated anganwadi centres, with prior intimation of the date and time and written consent from the parents.

Collection of blood sample: Under aseptic precautions, 2.5 mL of blood was drawn from the antecubital vein for a Complete Blood Count (CBC). The grading of anaemia was based on the concentrations of Hb in the blood (19):

• Mild anaemia: Hb of 10-10.9 g/dL
• Moderate anaemia: Hb of 7-9.9 g/dL
• Severe anaemia: Hb of <7 g/dL

Stage 3:

Intervention: The children received daily oral supplementation of IFA syrup based on their weight. The intervention consisted of IFA syrup containing a combination of elemental iron (80 mg) and folic acid (200 micrograms) (21).

All children aged 36-59 months who were found to have mild-to-moderate anaemia (Hb level of 7-10.9 g/dL) were offered intervention. The intervention involved daily observed oral iron supplementation (weight-based) given five days a week (Monday to Friday) for six months, ensuring that each child would receive at least 120 doses within 180 days. The study protocol is discussed in (Table/Fig 1).

Regular monitoring was conducted by trained local female research assistants who visited the anganwadi centres. Additionally, weekly visits were made to the households of the mothers of the beneficiary children. During these visits, a pretested semi-structured questionnaire was used to monitor adverse effects, address any concerns the mothers had regarding the supplementation, and improve awareness of the signs and symptoms of anaemia and its complications. Hb estimation was performed every three months to monitor the improvement in the children’s Hb levels.

Postintervention: Postintervention, Hb estimation was repeated after three and six months to assess the changes in Hb levels among the beneficiaries.

Quality control: Quality control measures were implemented. Daily examination and plotting of all three levels of Internal Quality Control (IQC) samples (normal, low, and high) were conducted using a Levy Jennings plot. All data were found to be within a 2 SD range, without any patterns that could be interpreted as an IQC fault.

Statistical Analysis

The data analysis was performed by comparing means using International Business Machines (IBM) Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) v25.0, with the treatment effect (before vs after supplementation) as a within-subject factor. The paired t-test and Fisher’s-exact test were used to assess the mean difference (after-before). A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The results are presented in tables and figures, as appropriate.

Results

A total of 281 children in the age group of 36-59 months were screened for anaemia. Among them, 55 children (19.6%) were diagnosed with anaemia. Two children had Hb levels below 7 gm/dL (severe anaemia) and were referred to a tertiary care teaching hospital for further evaluation and management.

Among the children with mild-to-moderate anaemia, 53 (18.9%) were included in the study after obtaining informed written consent from their parents. Of the study participants, 27 (50.9%) were boys, and 32 (60.3%) belonged to the age group of 36-47 months. The mean age of the study population was 46.6±8.4 months. The majority of children were of Hindu religion 36 (67.9%). Among the 53 children, 32 (60.4%) had mild anaemia, and 21 (39.6%) had moderate anaemia (Table/Fig 2).

During the intervention, the compliance with daily IFA supplementation among children was found to be 78%. The reasons given by the AWTs for non compliance were travel and/or absence of children from the anganwadi due to illnesses and local festivals/fairs. A total of 12 children (22.6%) were lost to follow-up after 3 months, and another 8 children (15.1%) were lost to follow-up after 6 months of intervention. Therefore, a total of 20 children (37.7%) were excluded from the postintervention evaluation. The reasons for loss to follow-up were migration of families out of the study area and children being sent to residential schools.

There was also an improvement in the grading of anaemia among the children from pre- to postintervention. At baseline, the majority of children 32 (60.4%) had mild anaemia. Six months postintervention, 11 children (33.3%) showed improvement in Hb levels above 11 gm/dL. The improvement in the grading of anaemia among the study participants was found to be statistically significant (Table/Fig 3).

After six months of daily IFA supplementation, there was an increase in the mean Hb from 9.79±1.11 gm/dL to 10.02±0.21 gm/dL (at 3-month postintervention) and 10.5±1.43 gm/dL (at 6-month postintervention). The improvement in Hb from baseline to 6-month postintervention was found to be statistically significant (2.579, p=0.011). The improvement in mean Hb at 6-month postintervention was statistically significant among both girls and boys (Table/Fig 4).

Eighteen children (33.9%) reported common side effects of IFA syrup, with 12 children (22.6%) experiencing constipation, 4 children (7.5%) experiencing heartburn, and two children (3.9%) experiencing stomach cramps.

Discussion

In the present study, one-fifth (19.6%) of the children aged 36-59 months were found to be anaemic. Among the children who started on IFA supplementation, 20 (37.7%) children were lost to follow-up during the intervention as they moved out of the study area. Among the children who completed six months of supplementation, 11 (33.3%) children became non anaemic, and 12 (36.4%) children improved their status from moderate to mild anaemia.

Previous national and sub-national surveys in India, including the National Family Health Survey (NFHS 4 and 5) (12),(13), District Level Household Survey (DLHS) (22), National Nutrition Monitoring Bureau Survey (NNMB) (23), and Comprehensive National Nutrition Survey (CNNS) (24), have provided some but not adequate information on the prevalence of anaemia among children under six years of age over the years. The NFHS 4 and 5, NNMB survey, DLHS 4, and CNNS survey all conducted Hb estimation among preschool children between 2010 and 2020. The data from the NFHS surveys show a 10% increase in the prevalence of anaemia between NFHS 4 and 5. This increase may be partly attributed to the change in the method (Haemocue) used for Hb estimation. However, in the present study, the authors used venous blood for Hb estimation, and the prevalence of anaemia among 36-59 month old children was found to be 19.6%, which is much lower compared to the national survey results.

The World Health Organisation (WHO) expert groups recommend oral iron supplementation as a public health intervention for reducing the prevalence of anaemia in preschool children. Studies on IFA supplementation in preschool children have shown that daily IFA supplementation for three months or longer has resulted in an improvement in mean Hb levels (~0.5-1 g/dL) and ferritin levels (21).

In the present study, the children received 6 months of daily weight-based IFA supplementation. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies assessing the effects of daily iron supplementation in 2 to 5-year-old children also found that daily iron supplementation increases Hb levels (25). Studies have also documented that the improvement in Hb levels was higher with daily supplementation compared to biweekly or weekly supplementation, but maintaining compliance with daily supplementation on a long-term basis was more challenging (26),(27). The current WHO guidelines recommend daily IFA supplementation for three months every year in settings where the prevalence of anaemia is 40% or higher (21).

In the present study, at 6 months postintervention, 33.3% of the children improved their Hb levels to normal values. This finding is consistent with a randomised double-blind trial conducted to assess the effects of iron supplementation among iron-deficient infants, which showed an increase in Hb values at 4 months postintervention (28).

The compliance with daily IFA supplementation was 78%, and the authors observed a loss to follow-up of 20 children (37.7%). This observation is also consistent with studies that reported iron with multi-micronutrient fortification resulting in a clear reduction in anaemia and an increase in Hb levels (29). The authors also found that adherence was better among children whose mothers were supportive of the intervention and attended the monthly health awareness group discussions. This finding is similar to another study conducted among children aged 12 to 59 months in rural southern India, which found that adherence to iron treatment improved through a combination of trial participation, improved maternal anaemia awareness, and close follow-up by lady health workers (30).

The postintervention results showed an improvement in anaemia and an increase in Hb levels among both boys and girls. This demonstrates that the use of an iron supplementation program for children with mild-to-moderate anaemia, through an intervention that is easy to operate and reproduce with active involvement of mothers, can make a huge difference in reducing anaemia among preschool children (31),(32).

In the present study, the daily intervention was administered at the anganwadi centre, and at 6 months postintervention, there was a significant rise in Hb levels (p<0.011). Another study found a greater increase in Hb levels among children receiving weekly intervention at home compared to the healthcare clinic, and this difference was also statistically significant (p<0.00005) (33). A few studies that have used intermittent supplementation have noted improvements in Hb levels when larger iron dosages, longer intervention times, and concurrent administration of vitamins and minerals are employed (34),(35).

The involvement of AWTs, support from local public health workers, and a locally trained woman acting as a research assistant in monitoring the supplementation and engaging mothers through home visits contributed to an adherence rate of over 50%. This finding aligns with a similar study conducted in the Empowered Action Group (EAG) states of India, which stated that interventions targeting only IFA supplements will not be sufficient. There is a need for policymakers to implement multiple interventions and approaches targeting the major preventable causes of anaemia among children aged 36-59 months (36).

Limitation(s)

The present research has some limitations. The diagnosis of anaemia was based solely on Hb levels, which restricted the classification of additional etiological categories of anaemia. Information on the duration of exclusive breastfeeding, the introduction of complementary foods, dietary patterns, parasite infestations, and genetic Hb abnormalities was not included in the present study. As a result, these factors were not assessed in the final analysis.

Conclusion

The compliance with daily IFA supplementation was 70-80%, and there was an increase in Hb levels among children postintervention. The increase was observed in both girls and boys. The grading of anaemia also showed improvement. A three-pronged strategy of supplementation, improving maternal anaemia awareness, and regular follow-ups by a local research assistant was employed in the present study. This emphasises the need for collaborative efforts between the public health sector, community organisations, and other stakeholders for the health of children.

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the AWTs, ASHA workers, and local leaders for their active participation in the study. The authors also thank the Principal, Director, Administration, and faculty-in-charge of the field workers at the rural health training centre for their support. Additionally, the authors would like to express their gratitude to all the mothers and caretakers of the children for their active cooperation throughout the study.

References

1.
Kotwal A. Iron deficiency anaemia among children in South East Asia: Determinants, importance, prevention, and control strategies. Curr Med Res Pract. 2016;6(3):117-22. [crossref]
2.
Global anaemia estimates in women of reproductive age, by pregnancy status, and in children aged 6-59 months. WHO Global Anaemia estimates, 2021 Edition. (Accessed on 15/06/2023). Available at: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/anaemia_in_women_and_children.
3.
Walter T. Effect of iron-deficiency anaemia on cognitive skills and neuromaturation in infancy and childhood. Food Nutr Bull. 2003;24(4 Suppl):S104-10. [crossref]
4.
Khandelwal N, Mandliya J, Nigam K, Patil V, Mathur A, Pathak A. Determinants of motor, language, cognitive, and global developmental delay in children with complicated severe acute malnutrition at the time of discharge: An observational study from Central India. PLoS One. 2020;15(6):e0233949. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
McCann S, Perapoch Amadó M, Moore SE. The role of iron in brain development: A systematic review. Nutrients. 2020;12(7):2001. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Grantham-McGregor S, Baker-Henningham H. Iron deficiency in childhood: Causes and consequences for child development. Annales Nestlé (English ed). 2010;68(3):105-19. [crossref]
7.
Oppenheimer SJ. Iron and its relation to immunity and infectious disease. J Nutr. 2001;131(2S-2):616S-33S. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Lozoff B. Iron deficiency and child development. Food Nutr Bull. 2007;28(4_suppl4):S560-S71. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
( Accelerating anaemia reduction: A comprehensive framework for action. WHO. Accessed on 17/06/2023). Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240074033.
10.
Anaemia Action Alliance. WHO. (Accessed on 17/06/2023). Available at: https:// www.who.int/teams/nutrition-and-food-safety/anaemia-action-alliance.
11.
Sant-Rayn Pasricha, Hal Drakesmith, James Black, David Hipgrave, Beverley-Ann Biggs; Control of iron deficiency anaemia in low- and middle-income countries. Blood. 2013;121(14):2607-17. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
( International Institute for Population Sciences. National Family Health Survey NFHS-4) Mumbai: IIPS; 2016. (Accessed on 17/06/2023). Available at: http://rchiips.org/nfhs/factsheet_NFHS-4.shtml.
13.
( International Institute for Population Sciences. National Family Health Survey NFHS-5) Mumbai: IIPS; 2021. (Accessed on 17/06/2023). Available at: http://rchiips.org/nfhs/factsheet_NFHS-5.shtml.
14.
Lopez A, Cacoub P, Macdougall IC, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Iron deficiency anaemia. The Lancet. 2016;387(10021):907-16. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Pacifici GM. Effects of iron in neonates and young infants: A review. International Journal of Pediatrics. 2016;4(7):2256-71.
16.
Crawley J. Reducing the burden of anaemia in infants and young children in malaria-endemic countries of Africa: From evidence to action. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;71(2_suppl):25-34. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Janus J, Moerschel SK. Evaluation of anaemia in children. Am Fam Physician. 2010;81(12):1462-71.
18.
Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. Guidelines for control of iron deficiency anaemia. National Iron Plus Initiative. New Delhi: MoHFW, Government of India; 2013. (Accessed on 19/06/2023). Available at: http://nhm.gov.in.
19.
WHO. Haemoglobin concentrations for the diagnosis of anaemia and assessment of severity. Vitamin and Mineral Nutrition Information System. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2011 (WHO/NMH/NHD/MNM/11.1) (Accessed on 19/06/2023). Available at: http://www.who.int/vmnis/indicators/haemoglobin.pdf.
20.
Population Census. (Accessed on 17/06/2023). Available at: https://www. census2011.co.in/data/village/606548-kakkaragolla-karnataka.html.
21.
Daily iron supplementation in infants and children. WHO, 2016. (Accessed on 17/05/2023). Available at: Chrome- https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/204712/9789241549523_eng.pdf.
22.
International Institute for Population Sciences. District Level (Household Survey DLHS-4) Mumbai: IIPS; 2016. (Accessed on 17/06/2023). Available at: http://rchiips.org/DLHS-4.html.
23.
Prevalence of micronutrient deficiencies. NNMB technical report 22 (2003). (Accessed on 15/06/2023). Available at: http://nnmbindia.org/NNMB%20MND%20REPORT%202004Web.pdf.
24.
Comprehensive national nutrition survey (2016-18) reports. (Accessed on 12/06/2023). Available at: https://nhm.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&level=2&sublinkid=1332&lid=713.
25.
Thompson J, Biggs BA, Pasricha SR. Effects of daily iron supplementation in 2- to 5-year-old children: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2013;131(4):739-53. Doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2256. PMID: 23478873. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Moorthy D, Merrill R, Namaste S, Iannotti L. The impact of nutrition-specific and nutrition-sensitive interventions on haemoglobin concentrations and anaemia: A meta-review of systematic reviews. Adv Nutr. 2020;11(6):1631-45. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Stoltzfus JR. Iron interventions for women and children in low-income countries. J Nutr. 2011;141(4):756S-62S. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Iskandar I, Afandi N, Ijradinata P. Effects of iron supplementation on haemoglobin concentration in 12-18-month-old iron-deficient anaemic infants. PI. 2018;34(7-8):179-76. [crossref]
29.
Mithra P, Khatib MN, Sinha AP, Kumar N, Holla R, Unnikrishnan B, et al. Interventions for addressing anaemia among children and adolescents: An overview of systematic reviews. Front Pediatr. 2021;8:549549. Doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.549549. PMID: 33665173; PMCID: PMC7921152. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Shet AS, Zwarenstein M, Rao A, Jebaraj P, Arumugam K, Atkins S, et al. Effect of a community health worker-delivered parental education and counseling intervention on anaemia cure rates in rural Indian children: A pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173(9):826-34. Doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.2087. PMID: 31329246; PMCID: PMC6646977. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Arcanjo FPN, Pinto VPT, Coelho MR, Amâncio OMS, Magalhães SMM. Anaemia reduction in preschool children with the addition of low doses of iron to school meals. J Trop Pediatr. 2008;54(4):243-47. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Abdel-Rasoul GM, Elgendy FM, Abd Elrazek ML. Iron deficiency anaemia among preschool children (2-6 years) in a slum area (Alexandria, Egypt): An intervention study. Menoufia Med J. 2017;30(1):213-20. [crossref]
33.
Coutinho GGPL, Goloni-Bertollo EM, Pavarino-Bertelli ÉC. Effectiveness of two programs of intermittent ferrous supplementation for treating iron-deficiency anaemia in infants: Randomized clinical trial. Sao Paulo Med J. 2008;126(6):314-18. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Palupi L, Schultink W, Achadi E, Gross R. Effective community intervention to improve haemoglobin status in preschoolers receiving once-weekly iron supplementation. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65(4):1057-61.[crossref][PubMed]
35.
Thu BD, Schultink W, Dillon D, Gross R, Leswara ND, Khoi HH. Effect of daily and weekly micronutrient supplementation on micronutrient deficiencies and growth in young Vietnamese children. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69(1):80-86 [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Singh RK, Patra S. Extent of anaemia among preschool children in EAG States, India: A challenge to policy makers. Anaemia. 2014;2014:868752.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/66337.18914

Date of Submission: Jul 01, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Sep 18, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Nov 18, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: The study was funded by SS Care Trust®, Karnataka, India.
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 07, 2023
• Manual Googling: Oct 11, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Nov 11, 2023 (4%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com