Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 37035

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : January | Volume : 18 | Issue : 1 | Page : QC12 - QC17 Full Version

Evaluation of Endometrial Thickness by Transvaginal Sonography in Postmenopausal Women with Bleeding: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: January 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/67553.18975
Ravidali Naga Swetha, Marri Pavani Rao, Rose Mary Penumaka

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Andhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pardesh, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Andhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pardesh, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Andhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pardesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Rose Mary Penumaka,
Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Andhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam-530002, Andhra Pardesh, India.
E-mail: dr.rosemarypenumaka@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Abnormal Uterine Bleeding (AUB), occurring atleast one year after menopause, is one of the most concerning complaints among gynaecological patients. Endometrial atrophy is the most common endometrial finding in women with Postmenopausal Bleeding (PMB), approximately 10-15% of whom have endometrial carcinoma. Earlier studies suggested that obesity, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, and hypertension are risk factors for endometrial hyperplasia. Diabetes mellitus, obesity, and hypertension form the triad of endometrial cancer.

Aim: To assess endometrial thickness by Transvaginal Sonography (TVS) and compare it with histopathological findings in women with PMB, evaluating whether an endometrial thickness of <4 mm on TVS is more suggestive of malignancy.

Materials and Methods: The present cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at King George Hospital, Vishakapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India, from January 2022 to December 2022, comprising n=100 subjects. After routine necessary investigations for PMB, a transvaginal ultrasound examination was carried out to calculate endometrial thickness and compare it with the results of histopathological diagnosis of the endometrium. The parameters assessed were endometrial thickness and appearance, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), hypertension, and Body Mass Index (BMI). The data was compiled and compared using the Chi-square test, with a p-value of ≤0.05 considered highly significant.

Results: The results showed normal atrophic and thickened endometrium in 36% of subjects each, and abnormal endometrium such as hyperplasia, carcinoma, and polyps were recorded in 14%, 8%, and 6% (n=6) of cases, respectively. The histopathological results showed normal endometrium such as atrophic, secretory, and proliferative endometrium in 49%, 6%, and 19% of subjects, respectively. Abnormal endometrial findings such as endometrial hyperplasia, carcinoma, and polyps were observed in 14%, 7%, and 5% of cases, respectively. The majority of cases (58%) had endometrial thickness ≤4 mm, followed by 36% of cases with 5-10 mm and 6% of cases >11 mm, with mean and Standard Deviation (SD) values of 5.8±3 mm. Statistical analysis data on the association between TVS findings and Histopathological Examination (HPE) findings was observed to be statistically significant (p<0.001). A statistically significant association was observed between T2DM, and BMI >25 kg/m2 together, DM+hypertension+BMI (Triad) and endometrial thickness, respectively.

Conclusion: The TVS is easy, simple, non invasive, and involves no complications. Therefore, it can be used as the first diagnostic step in the investigations of women with PMB, combined with histopathological assessment.

Keywords

Histopathological analysis, Hypertension, Obesity, Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Menopause is defined as the permanent cessation of menstruation resulting from the loss of ovarian follicular activity (1). The average age of menopause for Indian women is 47 years (2),(3),(4). Abnormal Uterine Bleeding (AUB), occurring atleast one year after menopause, is called PMB (5). It is one of the significant complaints of postmenopausal women, accounting for 5-10% of all gynaecological patients (1).

Endometrial atrophy is the most common endometrial finding in women with PMB, accounting for 60% of such bleeding. As a symptom of varied aetiology and its strong association with malignancy, it requires prompt and thorough evaluation. Even without amenorrhoea or irregularity, menstruation continuing after the age of 55 years should be investigated (6).

Atleast 20-25% of women with PMB are said to have a neoplastic lesion; approximately 10-15% of which have endometrial carcinoma. The carcinoma of the endometrium is one of the most common female pelvic malignancies and ranks as the fifth most common cancer in females after cervix, breast, oral cavity, and ovarian malignancies. The relatively low mortality for this cancer is probably due to the fact that most of these patients seek consultation at an early stage with symptoms of PMB (7),(8).

Budding screening modalities for endometrial cancer include TVS, saline infusion sonohysterography, 3D Colour Doppler ultrasound, endometrial sampling through endometrial aspiration biopsy, dilatation and curettage, hysteroscopy, and guided biopsy (9).

TVS is a simple, non invasive procedure useful for detecting changes in the endometrial thickness in patients who have undergone a biopsy (endometrial thickness >4 mm) and also aids in the detection of any other organic pathology (10).

The T2DM, a chronic disease increasing rapidly worldwide, is established to be a strong risk factor for progression to malignancies (11) and a high-risk factor for the incidence of endometrial cancer (12). T2DM is also associated with a high-risk of cardiovascular and microvascular complications and cancer (13). The relative risks associated with T2DM are greater than two-fold for liver, pancreatic, and endometrial cancer (14). Gressel GM et al., study results evidenced that in women with T2DM, the risk of endometrial cancer and endometrial hyperplasia is doubled and quadrupled, respectively (15).

The most prominent clinical sign of T2DM is hyperglycaemia, an environment that contributes to tumour progression through multiple pathways leading to increased proliferative, antiapoptotic, and metastatic cancer activity (16). However, the potential biological links between T2DM and the malignant progression of endometrial hyperplasia are unclear and not completely understood.

The majority of diabetic patients are obese or overweight (17). The incidence of Endometrial Cancer (EC) is increasing due to the prevalence of obesity, increased prevalence of diabetes, and changes in reproductive behaviour (e.g., nulliparity) (18),(19). Obese patients with a BMI >30 kg/m2 have higher relative risks for cancers than overweight (BMI >25 and <30 kg/m2) patients (20).

In addition, weight gain was observed to increase the risk of female reproductive organ neoplasms, namely, cancers of the endometrium, breast, and cervix (21),(22),(23). The global prevalence of obesity was associated with an increased risk of DM and EC, and the summary relative risk for EC was 1.52 (24). Besides, obesity has been demonstrated to be related to an overall increased risk of death and recurrence of cancer, among which there was a roughly 2-fold increase in EC mortality (25). The excessive secretion of endogenous oestrogen promotes the growth and proliferation of endometrial cells, thereby resulting in an increased risk of EC (26).

A review of the literature shows that there are studies combining endometrial thickness and their association with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and obesity (27),(28).

For many years, diagnostic curettage has been the method of choice to diagnose endometrial abnormalities (29). Subsequently, hysteroscopy combined with histological examination became the “gold standard” for such evaluation (30). Currently, the focus has shifted to TVS as a simple, non invasive alternative method to hysteroscopy and curettage (31), as it has reduced risks, is relatively inexpensive, and is recommended for the evaluation of the endometrium.

The present study aimed to assess endometrial thickness by TVS, compare it with the histopathological findings in women with PMB, and evaluate whether endometrial thickness of >4 mm on TVS is more suggestive of malignancy. Also, assess the role of T2DM, BMI, hypertension (alone and together in combination) in the progression of endometrial hyperplasia.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King George Hospital, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India from January 2022 to December 2022. The study was approved by the institutional human ethics committee (385/IEC/AMC/NOV2021), and informed written consent was obtained from all study participants.

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: The inclusion criteria involved postmenopausal women (n=100) with complaints of spotting and bleeding per vagina. Patients with vaginal infection, premalignant and malignant lesions of the vagina, vulva, and cervix, cervical and endocervical pathology, bleeding disorders, adnexal masses, and patients on tamoxifen and hormonal therapy were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

TVS and Histopathological Examination (HPE) were performed on all the women participants of the study group population as part of the evaluation of PMB. Thorough per abdominal, per speculum, and pervaginal examination was conducted to rule out any local cause of abnormal bleeding. After routine necessary investigations for PMB, a transvaginal ultrasound examination was carried out to calculate endometrial thickness and morphology. The subjects were asked to empty their bladder before the examination. A small amount of gel was applied over the transducer tip, and the probe was covered by a condom. The endometrium was imaged in a sagittal plane (Table/Fig 1),(Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3). Both anterior and posterior layers of the endometrium were measured. Histopathological diagnosis of the endometrium was obtained from specimens obtained by dilatation and curettage or by hysterectomy in patients who underwent hysterectomy.

The parameters studied on TVS included endometrial characteristics, endometrial appearance, and endometrial halo. Two groups were divided based on the histopathology report, which included atrophic endometrium, senile cystic atrophy, hyperplastic endometrium, disordered proliferative, endometrial polyp/fibroid, secretory endometrium, thickened endometrium, and endometrial carcinoma.

Statistical Analyiss

The descriptive analysis was carried out using the mean and standard deviation for continuous variables, and frequency and proportion for categorical variables. All quantitative variables were checked for normal distribution within each category of the explanatory variable by using visual inspection of histograms and normality Q-Q plots. All the aforementioned data were compiled and statistically analysed using the International Business Machine (IBM) Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 16.0 software package. The data were compared using the Chi-square test, and a p-value ≤0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The present study data showed that the majority (46%) of the subjects with PMB belonged to the age group 50-59 years, followed by 25% of subjects in the age group 40-49 years, 24% in the 60-69 years category, and 5% in the 70-79 years category. The mean age of the women recorded in the study was 55.09±7.66 years, with a minimum age of 40 years and a maximum of 74 years.

The majority (23%) of the cases had a parity of 3, followed by 22% of subjects with a parity of 4, 21% with a parity of 2, 17% with a parity of 5, 8% with a parity of 1, 6% with a parity of 6, and 3% of the subjects were nulliparous women.

The majority (69%) of the subjects attained menopause less than five years ago, followed by 13% of subjects who attained menopause 11-15 years ago, 12% within 6-10 years, and only 6% who attained menopause more than 16 years ago. The mean and SD values were 5.20±5.21 years, with a range of 1-20 years.

It was observed that 17% of cases had obesity alone, 10% had diabetes mellitus alone, 7% had hypertension alone, 9% had diabetes and hypertension, and 4% had all three: diabetes, hypertension, and obesity (Table/Fig 4).

In the present study, all the study group cases were subjected to TVS. The results recorded showed normal endometrial findings such as atrophic endometrium among 36% (n=36) subjects and thickened endometrium among 36% (n=36) cases. Abnormal endometrium such as hyperplasia of the endometrium was recorded in 14% (n=14) cases, carcinoma of the endometrium in 8% (n=8) subjects, and endometrial polyp in 6% (n=6) cases.

Normal endometrium such as atrophic endometrium was observed in 45% of subjects, secretory endometrium in 6% of subjects, and proliferative endometrium in 19% of cases. Abnormal endometrial findings such as endometrial hyperplasia were recorded in 14% of cases, endometrial carcinoma in 7% of cases, and endometrial polyp in 5% of cases (Table/Fig 5).

In the present study, 36% of the subjects had diabetes mellitus. Among the subjects with a normal endometrium, 25.7% had diabetes mellitus, whereas among the cases with abnormal endometrium, 65.4% of women had diabetes (p-value=0.001). There was no statistically significant association observed between hypertension and HPE findings (p=0.471). Similarly, there was no statistically significant association between BMI and HPE findings (p=0.071) (Table/Fig 6).

In the present study, the results of the histopathological findings with a thin line (n=0) and diffuse with regular margin (n=17) were considered as normal endometrium, whereas diffuse with irregular margins (n=8) and focal with a regular margin (n=1) were considered as abnormal endometrium (p-value=0.001). Additionally, 26.9% of study group cases with abnormal endometrium had a heterogeneous appearance, while 73.1% of subjects with abnormal endometrium had a homogenous appearance (p-value=0.001). A statistically significant association was observed between endometrial halo and HPE (p<0.001) (Table/Fig 7).

In the present study, the data on the association between TVS findings and HPE among the study group subjects (n=100) showed that among n=36 cases with atrophic endometrium in TVS, they had a normal endometrium in HPE. Similarly, among n=36 patients with thickened endometrium by TVS, it was found that n=33 cases had a normal endometrium, whereas n=3 cases had abnormal endometrium by HPE (p<0.001) (Table/Fig 8). Statistical analysis showed a statistically significant association between endometrial thickness and endometrial abnormality (p<0.001) (Table/Fig 9).

In the TVS findings (Table/Fig 10), among n=8 cases of endometrial carcinoma, n=2 cases were overdiagnosed as it turned out to be benign non pathological findings. Additionally, n=2 cases of endometrial carcinoma were missed and were diagnosed as proliferative endometrium. Among the n=14 cases of endometrial hyperplasia, n=3 cases were overdiagnosed, with n=1 case diagnosed with endometrium atrophy, n=1 case with proliferative endometrium, and n=1 case with secretory endometrium. Among the cases with endometrial polyp (n=6), n=3 cases were correctly diagnosed, whereas n=3 cases were overdiagnosed, with n=2 cases diagnosed with proliferative endometrium and n=1 case with secretory endometrium by HPE findings.

Among n=36 cases diagnosed with endometrial atrophy using TVS, it was found that n=4 cases were overdiagnosed. HPE findings showed n=1 case each with complex hyperplasia and secretory endometrium, whereas n=2 cases were diagnosed as senile cystic atrophy by HPE.

Among the cases with thickened endometrium (n=36) diagnosed using TVS, it was observed that n=12 cases were the same, whereas n=1 case was diagnosed as endometrial carcinoma, n=14 cases as proliferative endometrium, n=3 cases as secretory endometrium, n=2 cases as senile cystic atrophy, and n=4 cases as simple hyperplasia by histopathological findings.

In the present study, 80.8% of cases with PMB having abnormal HPE showed abnormal TVS, and 19.2% of cases having abnormal HPE showed normal TVS. Additionally, 9.5% of subjects having normal HPE showed abnormal TVS, and 90.5% of cases having normal HPE showed normal TVS (Table/Fig 11).

Discussion

In the present study, the mean age of the women was 55.09±7.66 years, and the majority (46%) of the subjects with PMB belonged to the age group between 50-59 years. Similar results were observed in the study conducted by Kaur M et al., comprising 112 patients, where the mean age was 57±6.41 years, and the majority of the patients (80%) belonged to the age group 51-60 years (32). Similarly, Thulasi P et al., reported that among 75 patients, the majority of the patients (33.3%) belonged to the age group 46-55 years (33).

In the present study, all the patients were subjected to TVS and recorded normal endometrial findings such as atrophic endometrium in 36% of cases and thickened endometrium in 36% of cases. Abnormal endometrium such as hyperplasia of the endometrium was recorded among 14% of cases, carcinoma of the endometrium among 8% of cases, and endometrial polyp among 6% of women. Similar results were reported by Singh P et al., with 38.3% of cases having a normal endometrium, 30% of cases having endometrial hyperplasia, 10% of subjects having an endometrial polyp, and 11.7% of cases having endometrial growth (9).

The histopathological assessment remains the gold standard diagnosis for endometrial evaluation. The cases subjected to HPE of the endometrium showed normal endometrium such as atrophic endometrium in 49% of cases, secretory endometrium in 6% of subjects, and proliferative endometrium among 19% of cases. Abnormal endometrial findings such as endometrial hyperplasia, endometrial carcinoma, and endometrial polyp were observed among 14%, 7%, and 5% of subjects, respectively.

Similarly, Kaur M et al., study results showed that 53.6% of cases had endometrial atrophy followed by 17.9% cases of endometrial hyperplasia, 14.3% cases of endometrial carcinoma, 10.7% cases of an endometrial polyp, and 3.6% cases had pyometra (32). Singh P et al., study reports showed that 10% of cases had a normal endometrium, 38.33% had atrophic endometrium, 18.3% had simple hyperplasia, 13.3% had endometrial carcinoma, 11.7% had disordered endometrium, 5% had atypical endometrium, and 3.3% had an endometrial polyp (9). Similar results were reported by Thulasi P et al., with 40% of cases having endometrial hyperplasia, 4% having endometrial atrophy, and 2.7% having carcinoma endometrium (33). Mathew M et al., reported that 29.7% of cases had disordered proliferative endometrium, 15.1% had proliferative endometrium, 30.3% had secretory endometrium, 5.9% had hyperplasia endometrium, 1.1% had carcinoma endometrium, and 18% had another type of endometrium (34).

Kaur M et al., study reports (Table/Fig 12) showed that the sensitivity was 100%, and accuracy was 85.71% with a cut-off value of the endometrial thickness of 4 mm (9),(32),(35). A study conducted by Singh P et al., showed that the majority of cases (40%) had endometrial thickness <4 mm, followed by 21.7% of cases with a thickness of 4.1-6 mm, 13.3% of cases between 6.1-8 mm, 15% of cases between 8.1-10 mm, and 10% of cases had a thickness >10 mm, with a mean endometrial thickness of 5.76±3.39 mm (9). The sensitivity of endometrial thickness on TVS with ≤4 mm was 87.09%, and accuracy was 81.66%, respectively. In a study conducted by Tulasi P et al., the results showed that the majority of women (46.7%) had endometrial thickness of 8-10 mm, followed by 24% of cases with 5-8 mm, 20% of cases with 10-15 mm, 5.3% had >15 mm, and 4% of cases had <5 mm (33). A study conducted by Mowafi DE et al., showed that the mean endometrial thickness among women with endometrial atrophy was 3.8±1.8 mm, with hyperplasia was 12.9±7.2 mm, endometritis was 12.5±0.7 mm, the polyp was 15.3±7.9 mm, and endometrial carcinoma was 21.1±9.8 mm (35). A study done by Shrestha HK et al., showed that there was no statistically significant predictive value of abnormal endometrium with the help of endometrial thickness (p>0.05) (36). A study conducted by Michail G et al., showed TVS accuracy in differentiating malignant lesions from benign endometrial lesions was 86% of specificity and 93.3% of sensitivity (37).

Many studies have suggested that T2DM and endometrial cancer share characteristics regarding major modifiable determiner, such as low physical activity and obesity (38),(39),(40). T2DM and endometrial hyperplasia are common conditions, and their co-diagnosis in the same individual was frequently detected (41).

As obesity is known to be accompanied by diabetes, it is, however, reasonable to suspect that diabetes-related endocrine perturbations may be responsible for a significant proportion of obesity-cancer risk (42). Most studies have indicated that diabetes is associated with an increased risk of death from endometrial cancer (43),(44).

In the present study, a statistically significant association was also observed in the cases having diabetes alone. Further studies are needed to be undertaken on large population data that can provide new insights into obesity-associated EC.

Limitation(s)

As the present study was a cross-sectional study, follow-up of the patients was not conducted. Therefore, the findings of the study cannot be generalised, as the study was conducted in a single centre.

Conclusion

The combination of morphological features with endometrial thickness on transvaginal ultrasound increases the diagnostic accuracy compared to using endometrial thickness alone. Thus, it is better to use a combination of metric and morphological parameters when performing a sonographic assessment of the endometrium in postmenopausal women. Early screening, early detection, and appropriate management aid in the proper and prompt treatment of women with PMB. Histopathological evaluation is mandatory for ruling out malignancy in cases of PMB with ET >4 mm. Diabetes mellitus, obesity, and hypertension are the triad of endometrial cancer, closely associated with an increased risk of EC. Therefore, proper lifestyle modifications for well-controlled sugars, good physical activity to prevent obesity, and early diagnosis and treatment of diabetes and hypertension can decrease morbidity and mortality due to endometrial cancer.

References

1.
Dawood NS, Peter K, Ibrar F, Dawood A. Postmenopausal bleeding: Causes and risk of genital malignancy. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2010;22(2):117-19.
2.
Bharadwaj JA, Kendurkar SM, Vaidya PR. Age and symptomatology of menopause in Indian women. J Postgrad Med. 1983;29(4):218-22.
3.
Bereck & Novak’s Gynaecology: 14th edition; 2007 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
4.
Biela U. Determinants of age at natural menopause. Przegl Lek. 2002;59(3):165-69.
5.
Chaudhari L, Satia MN. To study the correlation between endometrial thickness on transvaginal sonography and endometrial histopathology in women with postmenopausal bleeding. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;5:1309-15. [crossref]
6.
Kumar P, Malhotra N. Menopause. In: Jeffcoat’s principles of gynaecology. 7th ed. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. 2008; Pp. 613.
7.
Partridge EE, Shingleton HM, Menck HR. The National Cancer Data Base report on endometrial cancer. J Surg Oncol. 1996;61(2):111-23. 3.0.CO;2-F>[crossref]
8.
Swaminathan R, Rama R, Shanta V. Cancer Registration, Pattern and Trend in India in The Last Two Decades. In: Shanta V, Rajkumar T (eds). Oncology update. New Delhi: IJCP Group of Publications; 2004;03-10.
9.
Singh P, Dwivedi P, Mendiratta S. Correlation of endometrial thickness with the histop athological pattern of endometrium in postmenopausal bleeding. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016;66(1):42-46. Doi: 10.1007/s13224-014-0627-z. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Pillai SS. Sonographic and histopathological correlation and evaluation of endometrium in perimenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;3(1):113-17. [crossref]
11.
Mendonça FM, Sousa FRD, Barbosa AL, Martins SC, Araújo RL, Soares R, et al. Metabolic syndrome and risk of cancer: Which link? Metab Clin Exp. 2015;64(2):182-89. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Braun MM, Overbeek-Wager EA, Grumbo RJ. Diagnosis and management of endometrial Cancer. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93(6):468-74.
13.
Vrachnis N, Lavazzo C, Iliodromiti Z, Sifakis S, Alexandrou A, Siristatidis C, et al. Diabetes mellitus and gynaecologic cancer: Molecular mechanisms, epidemiological, clinical and prognostic perspectives, Arch Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;293(2):239-46. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Seewoodhary, Bain SC. Diabetes, diabetes therapies and cancer: What’s the link? Br J Diabetes Vasc Dis. 2011;11(5):235-38. [crossref]
15.
Gressel GM, Parkash V, Pal L. Management options and fertility-preserving therapy for premenopausal endometrial hyperplasia and early-stage endometrial cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(3):234-39. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Giri B, Dey S, Das T, Sarkar M, Banerjee J, Dash SK. Chronic hyperglycaemia mediated physiological alteration and metabolic distortion leads to organ dysfunction, infection, cancer progression and other pathophysiological consequences: An update on glucose toxicity. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;107:306-28. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), “Prevalence of overweight and obesity among adults with diagnosed diabetes—United States, 1988–1994 and 1999–2002,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2004;53(45):1066-68.
18.
Constantine GD, Kessler G, Graham S, Goldstein SR. Increased incidence of endometrial cancer following the women’s health initiative: An assessment of risk factors. J Womens Health. 2019;28(2):237-43. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Calle EE, Thun MJ. Obesity and cancer. Oncogene. 2004;23(38):6365-78. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Calle EE, Kaaks R. Overweight, obesity and cancer: Epidemiological evidence and proposed mechanisms. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2004;4(8):579-91. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Kulie T, Slattengren A, Redmer J, Counts H, Eglash A, Schrager S. Obesity and women’s health: An evidence-based review. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 2011;24(1):75-85. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Eliassen AH, Colditz GA, Rosner B, Willett WC, Hankinson SE. Adult weight change and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. JAMA. 2006;296(2):193-201. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
La Vecchia C, Giordano SH, Hortobagyi GN, Chabner B. Overweight, obesity, diabetes, and risk of breast cancer: Interlocking pieces of the puzzle. Oncologist. 2011;16(6):726-29. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K, Thun MJ. Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of US adults. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1625-38. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Shaw E, Farris M, McNeil J, Friedenreich C. Obesity and endometrial cancer. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2016;208:107-36. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Skandalis SS, Afratis N, Smirlaki G, Nikitovic D, Theocharis AD, Tzanakakis GN, et al. Cross-talk between estradiol receptor and EGFR/IGF-IR signaling pathways in estrogen-responsive breast cancers: Focus on the role and impact of proteoglycans. Matrix Biol. 2014;35:182-93. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Wijaya CF, Martaadisoebrata D. Diabetes mellitus and hypertension are risk factor for endometrial cancer. Indones J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;36(3):140-43.
28.
Ramandeep, Ravi R, Sharma D, Rajora P. Triad of obesity, hypertension and diabetes in endometrial cancer-do we really need to worry? J of Cardiovascular Dis Res. 2023;14(2):1860-65.
29.
Grimes DA. Diagnostic dilatation and curettage: A re-appraisal. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982;142(1):01-06. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Clark TJ, Mann CH, Shah N, Khan KS, Song F, Gupta JK. Accuracy of outpatient endometrial biopsy in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer: A systematic quantitative review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;109(3):313-21. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Granberg S, Wikland M, Karlsson B, Norstrom A, Friberg LG. Endometrial thickness as measured by endovaginal sonography for identifying endometrial abnormality. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;164(1 Pt 1):47-52. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Kaur M, Singh R, Sharma M. Endovaginal sonographic evaluation of postmenopausal uterine bleeding. J Clin Diag Res. 2010;4(2):2175-82.
33.
Thulasi P, Balakrishnan R, Shanthi M. Correlation of endometrial thickness by trans-vaginal sonography and histopathology in women with abnormal peri-menopausal and post-menopausal bleeding- A prospective study. Indian J of Obst and Gync Research. 2018;5(1):44-48. [crossref]
34.
Mathew M, Gupta R, Krolikowski A. Role of transvaginal ultrasonography and diagnostic hysteroscopy in the evaluation of patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;71:251-53. [crossref][PubMed] Mowafi DE, Farid A, El Badawi A. Transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy versus histopathology in postmenopausal bleeding. Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER). Edited by Aldo Campana. 2023 16:17:21. Available from: https://www.gfmer.ch/International_activities_En/ El_Mowafi/Transvaginal_sonography.htm.
36.
Shrestha HK, Adhikari RC, Shrestha KB. Endometrial assessment by transvaginal ultrasonography and correlation with histopathological among post menopausal women. J Pathol Nep. 2020;10:1613-17. [crossref]
37.
Michail G, Karahaliou A, Skiadopoulous S, Terzis G, Boniatis I, Costaridou L, et al. Texture analysis of perimenopausal and post-menopausal endometrial tissue in gray scale transvaginal ultrasonography. Br J Radiol. 2007;80(956):591-e192. [crossref][PubMed]
38.
Vainio H, Kaaks F, Bianchini F. Weight control and physical activity in cancer prevention: International evaluation of the evidence. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2002;11(2):S94-S100.
39.
Schouten LJ, Goldbohm RA, Van den Brandt PA. Anthropometry, physical activity, and endometrial cancer risk: Results from the Netherlands cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(21):1635-38. [crossref][PubMed]
40.
Modesitt SC, Nagell V. The impact of obesity on the incidence and treatment of gynaecologic cancers: A review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2005;60(10):683-92. [crossref][PubMed]
41.
Raffone A, Travaglino A, Saccone G, D’Alessandro P, Arduino B, Mascolo M, et al. Diabetes mellitus is associated with occult Cancer in endometrial hyperplasia. Pathol Oncol Res. 2020;26(3):1377-84. [crossref][PubMed]
42.
Pollak M. Insulin and insulin-like growth factor signalling in neoplasia. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8(12):915-28. [crossref][PubMed]
43.
Wang Y, Zeng X, Tan J, Xu Y, Yi C. Diavetes mellitus and endometrial carcinoma: Risk factors and etiological links. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(34):e30299. [crossref][PubMed]
44.
Njoku K, Agnew HJ, Crosbie EJ. Impact of Type 2 diabetes mellitus on endometrial cancer survival: A prospective database analysis. Front Oncol. 2022;12:899262.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/67553.18975

Date of Submission: Sep 17, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Oct 28, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Dec 21, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 18, 2023
• Manual Googling: Nov 15, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Dec 18, 2023 (17%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com