Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 38266

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : January | Volume : 18 | Issue : 1 | Page : PC09 - PC12 Full Version

Clinical Profile in Patients of Amoebic Liver Abscess with and without Hyperbilirubinemia: A Prospective Cohort Study


Published: January 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/68554.18948
S Sujitha, Rajiv Ranjan Kumar, Jitendra Kumar, Rekha Dewan

1. Resident (Post PG MCH), Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Madurai Medical College, Maduari, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, Dr. Baba Saheb Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, Rohini, New Delhi, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, Dr. Baba Saheb Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, Rohini, New Delhi, India. 4. Senior Specialist, Department of General Surgery, Dr. Baba Saheb Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, Rohini, New Delhi, India.

Correspondence Address :
Jitendra Kumar,
Dr. Baba Saheb Ambedkar Hospital, Sector-6, Rohini, New Delhi, India.
E-mail: jkumar33@ymail.com

Abstract

Introduction: In tropical countries like India, two-thirds of liver abscess cases are amoebic. Along with abdominal pain, fever, and other non-specific clinical features, jaundice is commonly observed in Amoebic Liver Abscess (ALA) cases. However, the understanding of jaundice in a patients with ALA is limited, and it is associated with a poor prognosis.

Aim: To compare the morbidity and mortality of ALA patients with and without hyperbilirubinemia, as well as their clinical outcomes.

Materials and Methods: The present prospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary teaching institute in northern India. It included 150 patients aged between 20 and 60 years with a confirmed diagnosis of ALA. The patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of hyperbilirubinemia. Those with jaundice resulting from other causes or a history of hepatitis were excluded. Variables examined in the study included age, sex, alcohol intake, basic laboratory parameters, ultrasound-assessed abscess size and number, and duration of hospital stay.

Results: Among the 150 cases, 22 (14.6%) had elevated serum bilirubin levels (>1 mg/dL). Additionally, 122 (81.33%) had a history of alcohol intake, and 117 (78%) had a single abscess cavity. In ALA patients with hyperbilirubinemia, 12 (54.55%) had abnormal creatinine values, and 6 (27.26%) experienced complications such as rupture and peritonitis. One mortality occurred in a patient with ALA and jaundice.

Conclusion: ALA patients with jaundice exhibited larger abscess cavities, a higher complication rates, a longer hospital stays, and a poor prognoses.

Keywords

Amoebiasis, Extraintestinal amebiasis, Entamoeba histolytica, Hepatic-entamoebiasis, Jaundice

Liver abscess is a prevalent condition in surgical practice, occurring worldwide but with a higher incidence in countries like India, tropical regions of Africa, Mexico, and Central America (1). It can be caused by bacterial, parasitic, fungal, or mixed infections, leading to the formation of a pus-filled mass in the liver parenchyma. Different types of liver abscess, including amoebic, pyogenic, fungal, and mixed types, can occur (2),(3). ALA is the most common extra-intestinal manifestation of amebiasis, affecting 3-9% of cases (4). Amebiasis is a parasitic infection caused by ingestion of Entamoeba histolytica cysts through contaminated food or water. ALA is particularly prevalent in tropical countries like India, where 50-70% of liver abscess cases are amoebic in nature (5). The high incidence of ALA in tropical developing countries may be attributed to factors such as poor sanitation, overcrowding, poverty, and inadequate nutrition (6),(7).

The typical symptoms and signs associated with ALA include right hypochondriac abdominal pain that worsens with coughing, jolting, and deep breathing; fever of varying degrees with or without rigours; tender hepatomegaly; and intercostal tenderness (8). Common laboratory findings include leukocytosis, anemia, and elevated liver enzymes. Chest X-rays may reveal an elevated right hemi-diaphragm, pleural effusion, and basal atelectasis. Abdominal USG is a preferred diagnostic modality for ALA, showing hypoechoic lesions with poor rim echoes, predominantly affecting the right lobe (8).

Jaundice is frequently observed in ALA patients and is considered a poor prognostic indicator. Serum bilirubin levels >3.5 mg/dL, encephalopathy, and hypoalbuminemia are independent risk factors for mortality in ALA cases (8),(9). The causes of hyperbilirubinemia in ALA are not fully understood but are thought to be either due to cholestasis resulting from the mechanical pressure of the abscess cavity on biliary channels or parenchymal destruction of liver cells (10). Previous studies have shown increased morbidity and mortality in ALA patients with jaundice, attributed to liver cell necrosis and subsequent damage to biliary canaliculi and associated vascular channels (9),(10). However, there is limited research available (10),(11) that specifically addresses the clinical, laboratory, and radiological profiles of ALA patients in correlation with jaundice. Therefore, the aim of this study is to assess the morbidity and mortality of ALA patients with and without hyperbilirubinemia, considering their clinical, biochemical, microbiological, and radiological profiles.

Material and Methods

This prospective cohort study was conducted at Dr. Baba Saheb Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital in Delhi, India, from October 2016 to December 2017. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC approval letter No.- F.5(59)/2013/BSAH/DNB/Committees/11423) prior to the start of the study.

Inclusion criteria: Patients between the ages of 20 and 60 years who were diagnosed with ALA and provided consent were enrolled in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with cholangitis, gall bladder and Common Bile Duct (CBD) stones, hepatitis, CBD stricture, medical renal disease, critically ill patients requiring ICU admission, pregnant women, and patients with a history of malignancy were excluded.

Sample size: A convenient sample of 150 patients with serum bilirubin levels above 1 mg/dL was included in Group-1, while the remaining patients with normal serum bilirubin levels were included in Group-2. The variables studied in both groups included age, sex, alcohol intake, previous history of hepatitis, and the site, size, and number of liver abscesses observed on Ultrasonography (USG).

Procedure

A detailed history, physical examination, routine laboratory investigations, chest X-ray, and USG abdomen were conducted as a baseline measures for all eligible patients. The laboratory tests and their normal ranges are presented in (Table/Fig 1). USG abdomen was performed in both supine and lateral positions to assess the morphological characteristics of the liver abscess. Chest X-rays were obtained to evaluate for pleural effusion, basal atelectasis, or any pulmonary complications related to ALA. The diagnosis of ALA was confirmed by amoebic serology in all cases.

In either group, percutaneous aspiration or catheter drainage of the ALA was considered if patients did not show improvement in symptoms after five days of medical therapy, if the abscess cavity diameter exceeded 300 cm, if there was a thin rim of parenchymal tissue (<10 mm) around the abscess, if the abscess was located near the right porta hepatis, or if there was evidence of mechanical obstruction to the biliary tree or Inferior Vena Cava (IVC). Outcomes were assessed based on symptom and sign improvement, reduction in bilirubin level, and decrease in abscess cavity size on USG examination.

Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables were presented as numbers and percentages (%), while continuous variables were presented as mean ± SD and median. The data was entered into a Microsoft excel spreadsheet and analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0. The normality of the data was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Non-parametric tests were used for variables that did not follow a normal distribution. The independent t-test was used to compare quantitative variables, while the Mann-Whitney U test was used for variables with non-normal distribution. Qualitative variables were analysed using either the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Out of the 150 patients with ALA included in the present study, 22 had a raised level of serum bilirubin and were included in Group-1, while the remaining 128 patients had normal serum bilirubin levels and were included in Group-2. The baseline characteristics of subjects in both groups were comparable and summarised in (Table/Fig 2). The majority of cases (n=68/46%) were seen in the age group of 36 to 45 years in both groups. The male-to-female sex ratio in Group-1 was 21:1, while in Group-2 it was 9.66:1. Symptoms such as pain, abdomen, and fever were comparable in both groups with no statistical difference (p-value=1.00). Hepatomegaly was observed in the USG examination, and a significant number of patients (81.8%) in Group-1 had hepatomegaly compared to Group-2.

The histories of alcohol intake by the patients in both groups were comparable, with no statistically significant difference. Group-1 had a higher prevalence of thrombocytopenia, deranged blood sugar, urea, and serum creatinine, and these differences were statistically significant compared to Group-2 (Table/Fig 2). In Group-1, 2 (9.09%) patients had deranged PT-INR, while none of the patients in Group-2 had deranged PT-INR. A larger number of patients (16, 72.73%) in Group-1 with hyperbilirubinemia had a large (>300 cc) abscess.

Depending on the clinical condition and severity of the disease, patients were managed using conservative medical management, percutaneous needle aspiration, or catheter drainage. All patients in Group-1 required some form of intervention for the management of liver abscesses. Only one patient in Group-1 required exploratory laparotomy for a ruptured liver abscess. Intercostal tube drainage for symptomatic relief in patients with pleural effusion was required in 2 (9.1%) patients in Group-1 and 5 (3.91%) patients in Group-2, which was statistically significant (p-value=0.007). However, there was no significant difference in the rate of complications between the two groups (p-value=0.06). Pus cultures from 17 patients were positive for secondary bacterial infection, with E.coli being the most common pathogen (12, 70.59%).

One patient with a ruptured liver abscess, severe peritonitis, and septicemia in Group-1 died during the course of treatment. Among the remaining 149 patients, the mean length of hospital stay was 13.31±5.3 days (range: 7-62 days), with a median of 13 days. There was a statistically significant difference in the duration of hospital stay between Group-1 and Group-2 (p-value <0.0001) (Table/Fig 3).

Patients in both groups responded well to therapeutic management, either through medical or surgical intervention, and the response time was found to depend on the size of the abscess. Larger abscesses took more time to respond. In Group-1, the response to treatment varied and was found to be related to the level of serum bilirubin at admission. After 72 hours of management, 15 (71.42%) patients in Group-1 had serum bilirubin levels of 1-3 mg/dL compared to 6 (27.27%) at baseline (p-value=0.013), which is statistically significant. A summary of different outcomes at admission and after 72 hours of treatment is presented in (Table/Fig 4).

Discussion

In the present study, the mean age of patients was 40.37±8.94 years, and 91.33% were male and 8.63% were female. Out of a total of 150 patients, 14.66% were found to have jaundice. Jaundice in patients with ALA is a common finding, and according to the literature, it may be between 6 and 29% (10),(11). The incidence of jaundice in ALA reported in the literature has a lot of variation, and this trend is increasing with time. For example, Chhetri MK et al., reported it at 6% in their series, Vakil BJ et al., reported 7.8%, Chen HL et al., reported 21.43%, and Jha AK et al., reported as high as 28% in their series (12),(13),(14),(15). The increasing trend of higher incidences of jaundice reported in ALA may be due to the wide availability and access to laboratory investigations now. It has been observed that in a series where a higher incidence of jaundice among patients with ALA was reported, it was also associated with more incidences of complications, morbidity, and even mortality (11),(13). In this study also, the authors found the same result with more morbidity, and overall, one reported mortality was reported in a patient with ALA with jaundice.

The demographic findings of the current study match fairly with the findings of other studies. For example, Sharma N et al., reported a mean age of 40.5±2.1 years in their series, while Mukhopadhyay M et al., reported 91.67% male and 8.33% female in their series of patients with ALA (16),(17). In the current study, symptoms like fever and pain in the abdomen were present in 93.33% and 98%, respectively, which was also comparable to the findings of other studies. Sharma N et al., reported 94% of patients with fever and 90% of patients with pain in the abdomen, while in a series by Mukhopadhyay M et al., it was reported to be 80.56% and 83.33%, respectively (16),(17). In 67.33% of patients, involvement of the right lobe of the liver and the finding of a single abscess cavity in 78% of patients in this study are on par with the literature and findings of an earlier study (16).

Many studies have found a strong association between alcohol consumption and hyperbilirubinemia in patients with ALA (14),(15),(18),(19). They found that the majority of patients with a history of chronic alcoholism have hyperbilirubinemia compared to non-alcoholic ones [15,18,19]. In the present study, the authors found the same result. Out of the total 150 cases of ALA, 81.3% of patients and 90.90% of patients with jaundice had a history of alcohol intake. Most of the reported series found a raised TLC count in patients with ALA, and it was more pronounced in patients with ALA with jaundice (20),(21). In the present study, there were also 62.67% of the total 150 patients with ALA and 95.45% of the patients with ALA with jaundice found to have leukocytosis. Comparison of findings of similar studies are summarised in (Table/Fig 5) (12),(13),(14),(15),(16),(17).

Most of the studies done earlier found deranged kidney function and a higher associated high blood sugar level in a patient with ALA who had jaundice (19),(21). In the present study, among ALA patients who had jaundice, 72.73% had elevated serum urea, 54.55% had raised serum creatinine, and 40.91% had an elevated random blood sugar value. Comparing these results with patients with ALA without jaundice, we found a statistically significant difference. Katazenstein D et al., and Gupta RK correlated the high value of Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) with the duration of ALA, which returned to normal after the resolution of the abscess. Abnormally high ALP is associated with ALA and is considered the most reliable and consistent biochemical indicator of ALA (22),(23). Also, a raised level of ALP is found to be associated with an increase in the size of the abscess cavity in patients with ALA (24). The findings of the present study correlate well with these earlier findings. In the present study, 86.36% of patients with jaundice and 50.78% of ALA patients without jaundice had raised ALP, while 61.90% of overall patients with an abscess cavity size greater than 300 cm had raised ALP.

Most of the patients with uncomplicated ALA with a size of abscess less than 100 cm were managed in this series with medical management, while larger abscesses with or without complications required drainage procedures in the form of percutaneous needle aspiration or catheter drainage. Most of the studies reported earlier that medical management is the mainstay of treatment for ALA and itself is sufficient for uncomplicated abscesses of size less than 5 cm (1),(6),(8),(12),(25). Patients with ALA with jaundice reported a higher rate of complications than the cases without jaundice. The authors found complications like rupture in the pleural cavity in 4.66% of cases, rupture in the peritoneal cavity in 7.33% of cases, and generalised peritonitis and death in 0.6% of cases. These findings of the present study are comparable with those of earlier studies (10),(17). The authors found that patients of ALA with jaundice have a longer duration of hospital stay in comparison to patients without jaundice, which is well understood by the fact that ALA patients with jaundice have a serious nature of illness with a higher rate of complications.

Limitation(s)

The samples for this study were chosen from a single source, and they were already diagnosed cases of ALA. The selected cases were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of jaundice without randomisation. This study was a simple observational study without randomisation or intervention, and the authors observed the limited jaundiced population found in our small series of ALA. Further study is required that should be based on a randomised sample representing a wider population.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the current study observed that hyperbilirubinemia, or jaundice, is not a rare manifestation of ALA. Patients with ALA who have diabetes and a history of chronic alcohol intake are more likely to develop jaundice and other complications. Deranged laboratory parameters in terms of leucocytosis, raised serum urea, and creatinine are more frequently associated with patients with ALA and jaundice. Raised serum bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase in a patient with ALA are associated with a longer duration of hospital stay, higher complications, and a poor prognosis.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the Department of Microbiology and the hospital authority for their logistic and technical support.

References

1.
Salles JM, Moraes LA, Salles MC. Hepatic amebiasis. Braz J Infect Dis. 2003;7(2):96-110. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Czerwonko ME, Huespe P, Bertone S, Pellegrini P, Mazza O, Pekolj J, et al. Pyogenic liver abscess: Current status and predictive factors for recurrence and mortality of first episodes. HPB (Oxford). 2016;18(12):1023-30. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Mischnik A, Kern WV, Thimme R. Pyogener Leberabszess: Erregerprofil und Konsequenzen für Diagnostik und Therapie (Pyogenic liver abscess: Changes of Organisms and Consequences for Diagnosis and Therapy). Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2017;142(14):1067-74. German. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Cuschieri A, Giles GR, Moosa AR, Essential Surgical Practice. Butterworth Heinemann, London, UK, 3rd edition, 1995.
5.
Menon AR, Kizhakkekarammal PK, Rao GK. Amoebic vs pyogenic liver abscesses: A comparative study in a tertiary care hospital. J Acad Clin Microbiol. 2015;17(2):89-93. [crossref]
6.
Channanna C, Rehman FU, Choudhuri B, Patil A. A clinical study, diagnosis and management of Liver Abscess at VIMS, Bellary. J Evidence Based Med Health Care. 2014;1(7):668-85. [crossref]
7.
Rani R, Murthy RS, Bhattacharya S, Ahuja V, Rizvi MA, Paul J. Changes in bacterial profile during amebiasis: Demonstration of anaerobic bacteria in ALA pus samples. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;75(5):880-85. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Sharma MP, Sarin SK. Amoebic liver abscess in a North Indian hospital--current trends. Br J Clin Pract. 1987;41(6):789-93. [crossref]
9.
Singh V, Bhalla A, Sharma N, Mahi SK, Lal A, Singh P. Pathophysiology of jaundice in amoebic liver abscess. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;78(4):556-59. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Nigam P, Gupta AK, Kapoor KK, Sharan GR, Goyal BM, Joshi LD. Cholestasis in amoebic liver abscess. Gut. 1985;26(2):140-45. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Sarda AK, Mishra A, Malhotra N, Manchanda A. Hyperbilirubinemia in patients with amoebic liver abscess: A study of 75 cases. J Gastroint Dig System. 2013;3:138. https://www.omicsonline.org/hyperbilirubinemia-in-patients-with-amoebic-liver-abscess-a-study-of-cases-2161-069X.1000138.php?aid=19323.
12.
Chhetri MK, Chakravorty NC, Neelakantan C, Bhattacharya B, Sarkar SK. Hepatic amoebiasis and its treatment with metronidazole. J Assoc Physicians India. 1969;17(11):681-88.
13.
Vakil BJ, Mehta AJ, Desai HN. Atypical manifestation of amoebic abscess of liver. Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1970;73(3):63-67.
14.
Chen HL, Bair MJ, Lin IT, Wu CH, Lee YK. Clinical manifestations and risk factors of amebic liver abscess in Southeast Taiwan compared with other regions of Taiwan. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;89(6):1214-18. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Jha AK, Jha P, Chaudhary M, Purkayastha S, Jha SK, Ranjan R, et al. Evaluation of factors associated with complications in amoebic liver abscess in a predominantly toddy-drinking population: A retrospective study of 198 cases. JGH Open. 2019;3(6):474-79. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Sharma N, Sharma A, Varma S, Lal A, Singh V. Amoebic liver abscess in the medical emergency of a North Indian hospital. BMC Res Notes. 2010;3:21. Doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-21. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Mukhopadhyay M, Saha AK, Sarkar A, Mukherjee S. Amoebic liver abscess: presentation and complications. Indian J Surg. 2010;72(1):37-41. Doi: 10.1007/ s12262-010-0007-6. Epub 2010 Feb 5. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Alam F, Salam MA, Hassan P, Mahmood I, Kabir M, Haque R. Amebic liver abscess in northern region of Bangladesh: Sociodemographic determinants and clinical outcomes. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:625. Doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-625. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Mathur S, Gehlot RS, Mohta A, Bhargava N. Clinical profile of amoebic liver abscess. J Ind Acad Clin Med. 2002;3:367-73. https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/265737521_Clinical_Profile_of_Amoebic_Liver_Abscess.
20.
Sharma MP, Ahuja V. Management of amebic liver abscess. Arch Med Res. 2000;31(4 Suppl):S4-5. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Bansal P, Ranjan A, Agrawal K, Pandey CP. Clinical study of amoebic liver abscess in Rohilkhand region and its management. Ann Int Med Den Res. 2017;3(2):SG51-SG54. [crossref]
22.
Katzenstein D, Rickerson V, Braude A. New concepts of amebic liver abscess derived from hepatic imaging, serodiagnosis, and hepatic enzymes in 67 consecutive cases in San Diego. Medicine (Baltimore). 1982;61(4):237-46. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Gupta RK. Amebic liver abscess: A report of 100 cases. Int Surg. 1984;69(3):261-64.
24.
Khanna S, Chaudhary D, Kumar A, Vij JC. Experience with aspiration in cases of amebic liver abscess in an endemic area. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005;24(6):428-30. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Zafar A, Ahmed S. Amoebic liver abscess: A comparative study of needle aspiration versus conservative treatment. J Ayub Med Coll. 2002;14(1):10-12.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/68554.18948

Date of Submission: Nov 09, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Dec 04, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Dec 21, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2024

Author declaratio n:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 18, 2023
• Manual Googling: Dec 13, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Dec 18, 2023 (10%)

Etymology: Author Origin

Emendatio ns: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com