Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 38074

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : January | Volume : 18 | Issue : 1 | Page : OC48 - OC52 Full Version

Vitamin D Status and its Correlation with Carotid Intima-media Thickness amongst Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Hospital-based Cross-sectional Study


Published: January 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/65406.18966
Subrat Kumar Dutta, Mamata Singh, Pramod Kumar Rout, Nihar Ranjan Mohanty, Anurag Choudhury, Bhagyashree Panda, Bibhu Pada Hota, Pravat Kumar Thatoi

1. Senior Resident, Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India. 2. Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Jajati Keshari Medical College and Hospital, Jajpur, Odisha, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of General Medicine, Dharanidhar Medical College, Keonjhar, Odisha, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of General Medicine, KIMS and PBMH Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 5. General Duty Medical Officer, Department of Emergency Department, NTPC Hospital, Kaniha, Talcher, Odisha, India. 6. Assistant Professor, Department of General Medicine, PRM Medical College and Hospital, Baripada, Odisha, India. 7. Assistant Professor, Department of General Medicine, Dharanidhar Medical College, Keonjhar, Odisha, India. 8. Professor, Department of General Medicine, Dharanidhar Medical College, Keonjhar, Odisha, India.

Correspondence Address :
Pravat Kumar Thatoi,
Flat-2C, Kingston Residency, Cantonment Road, Cuttack-753001, Odisha, India.
E-mail: drpravatthatoi@yahoo.co.in

Abstract

Introduction: There is rising concern about vitamin D deficiency around the globe due to its increasing association with multiple medical disorders. Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is an established risk factor for atherosclerotic disorders, and Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness (CIMT) is considered a radiological marker of subclinical atherosclerosis.

Aim: To find a correlation between serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25-(OH)-D) levels and CIMT among patients with DM.

Materials and Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted, including 100 adult patients with Type 2 DM who were admitted to the Department of Medicine at SCB Medical College and Hospital in Cuttack, Odisha, India from October 2020 to September 2021. Vitamin D deficiency was defined as serum 25-(OH)-D levels <20 ng/mL, and insufficiency as <30 ng/mL. The demographic profile of patients, family history of Type 2 DM, smoking history, blood pressure, haemogram, blood sugar, serum electrolytes, and lipid profile were studied. CIMT of the bilateral Common Carotid Artery (CCA) was measured by B-mode ultrasonography. CIMT values ≥ 0.8 mm were considered abnormal. Data were analysed using appropriate statistical tests in Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0.

Results: The present study included 55% males (n=55) and 45% females (n=45). The average age of the patients was 60 ±10 years, ranging from 26-75 years. Vitamin D deficiency was highly prevalent among patients with Type 2 DM (73% deficient, 12.5 ng/mL; 21% insufficient, 24.7 ng/mL). Vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency was higher among male participants (57.5%, 62%) compared to females (42.4%, 38%). Vitamin D levels were significantly associated with dyslipidemia. Mean CIMT among the vitamin D deficiency versus insufficiency versus normal group were 0.87 versus 0.87 versus 0.7 mm on the right Common Carotid Artery (CCA), and 0.95 versus 0.86 versus 0.75 mm on the left CCA, respectively. Significant negative correlations were observed for HbA1c (r=-0.025), Triglycerides (r=-0.274), right CIMT (r=-0.284), and left CIMT (r=-0.264) with serum 25-(OH)-D levels.

Conclusion: The majority of patients with Type 2 DM have concurrent vitamin D deficiency. A significant inverse linear association between serum vitamin D levels and CIMT was observed, indicating the association of vitamin D deficiency with subclinical atherosclerosis. Although unproven in the present study, the role of vitamin D supplementation in the improvement of atherosclerosis remains unclear.

Keywords

Atherogenesis, Cholecalciferol, Dyslipidemia, Prevalence, Ultrasonography

Vitamin D, a fat-soluble vitamin and immunomodulatory hormone, is well-known for its functions beyond calcium and bone homeostasis. The expression of Vitamin D Receptor (VDR) on immune cells has demonstrated the pathophysiology of vitamin D in several inflammatory conditions like DM, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), Rheumatoid Arthritis, Asthma, Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19), etc. (1),(2),(3),(4). In recent years, vitamin D deficiency has become an epidemic worldwide, affecting individuals of all ages, genders, and ethnicities (5). In India, the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in the community ranges from 50-94% (6),(7), and among patients with DM, it is reported to be 63-91% (8),(9), which is an established risk factor for atherosclerosis (10).

While carotid angiography is considered the gold standard for demonstrating atherosclerosis, its invasiveness and cost limit its routine use (10). An alternative non invasive modality is the measurement of CIMT using B-mode ultrasonography, which is considered an accessible surrogate marker of atherosclerosis (9),(10).

Several international studies, along with a few conducted in India, have been carried out to establish the role of vitamin D in atherosclerosis by measuring CIMT levels (11),(12),(13),(14),(15). However, only one study focused on Type 2 DM patients in India (9). Among patients with Type 1 DM, only 8% had normal vitamin D status, and there was no significant association between vitamin D deficiency and higher CIMT levels (15). A recent study involving the Brazilian population descended from African slaves reported a low prevalence of vitamin D deficiency (4.8%), and no independent association was observed between vitamin D levels and CIMT (16). A similar study on Korean adults found that low vitamin D levels were not associated with higher CIMT but showed a significant negative correlation with carotid atherosclerosis (17). Furthermore, the association of dyslipidemia with vitamin D deficiency and the role of vitamin D supplementation in atherosclerosis remain controversial (18),(19). Despite multiple studies conducted globally, a uniform result on vitamin D status and subclinical atherosclerosis has yet to be achieved. Given the scarcity of studies assessing vitamin D levels and CIMT among diabetics in India (9),(20), the present study aimed to estimate the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among Type 2 DM patients and correlate it with their CIMT levels.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted, including 100 adult patients with Type 2 DM who were admitted to the Department of Medicine at SCB Medical College and Hospital in Cuttack, Odisha. The study was carried out over a period of one year, from October 2020 to September 2021. Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants in the local Odia language. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional review board and Ethical Committee (letter no. IEC 204/26.08.2020).

Sample size calculation: The sample size was calculated to be 83, based on a prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among diabetics of 71% and a margin of error of 10% (9). However, the final sample size included in the study was 100.

Inclusion criteria: Patients of age ≥18 years with a diagnosis of Type 2 DM or under treatment for Type 2 DM were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients diagnosed with Type 1 DM, Gestational DM, diabetic ketoacidosis, or hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state, those with a recent history of acute illness, chronic kidney disease, chronic liver disease, patients taking medications likely to affect vitamin D levels (such as calcium and vitamin D supplements, Teriparatide injections, thyroxine, anticonvulsants, orlistat, cholestyramine), pregnant individuals, known patients with cardiovascular diseases, dyslipidemia, and chronic diarrhoea were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

A detailed history, thorough physical and clinical examination, and medication history were obtained from each patient. Blood pressure was measured twice, with a five-minute apart using an automated digital blood pressure machine, and the mean value was recorded. Participants were subjected to eight hours overnight fasting, and blood samples were collected for routine investigations including complete blood count, serum fasting blood sugar, two-hour post-prandial blood sugar, serum C-peptide, serum electrolytes, kidney function tests, liver function tests, lipid profile, HbA1c, and urine routine microscopy.

Vitamin D (serum 25-(OH)-D) levels were measured using a competitive Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) kit manufactured by Euro-Immune (Germany). The participants were divided into three groups based on their serum 25-(OH)-D levels: >30 ng/mL as normal, 20-30 ng/mL as insufficient, and <20 ng/mL as deficient (6).

The CIMT was measured using B-mode ultrasonography. A B-mode image was taken at the distal Common Carotid Artery (CCA). The patient’s head was rotated 45° away from the imaged side, and the probe was held parallel to the artery to ensure clear visualisation of the double lines of the lumen-intima and media-adventitia interfaces on both near and far walls. The CIMT measurement was taken below the bulb and extended caudally over a distance of approximately 1 cm (Table/Fig 1). CIMT ≥0.8 mm was considered abnormal (12).

Statistical Analysis

The data were entered in Microsoft Excel, and statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS version 26.0. The data were checked for normality. Normally distributed continuous data were presented as mean±Standard Deviation (SD), while categorical data were presented as proportions. Differences between groups were assessed using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables and the Chi-square test for categorical variables. Pearson’s correlation was used to analyse the relationship between different parameters, including CIMT (right) and CIMT (left), with serum vitamin D levels. The correlation coefficient (r) was reported. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant, while a p-value of less than 0.001 was considered highly significant. A scatter plot of vitamin D levels and CIMT was created using Microsoft Excel.

Results

The present study included 100 patients, comprising 55% males (n=55) and 45% females (n=45). The average age of the patients was 60 ±10 years, with an age range of 26 to 75 years. (Table/Fig 2) demonstrates that the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency was 73% in the current study, with a mean serum 25-(OH)-D level of 12.5 ng/ mL, while 21% were insufficient, with a mean serum 25-(OH)-D level of 24.7 ng/mL. Male patients exhibited severe vitamin D deficiency (57.5%) or insufficiency (62%) compared to female patients (42.5% and 38%, respectively).

The majority of participants in the vitamin D deficient group had a positive family history of Type 2 DM, smoking, and antihypertensive drug use, as opposed to the insufficient and normal vitamin D groups. Smoking history was present in 13% of the patients (n=13).

Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) values significantly differed among vitamin D deficient, insufficient, and normal vitamin D groups (77.4 mmHg versus 73.4 mmHg versus 75.3 mmHg, p=0.036). The average 2 hour-Postprandial Blood Sugar (PPBS) in the deficient group was 247.6 mg/dL, compared to 218.3 mg/dL in the insufficient group (p=0.039). Furthermore, the serum TG levels were 112.7 mg/dL in the vitamin D deficient group and 99 mg/dL in the insufficient group (p=0.004).

Regarding CIMT, 8% of patients had normal CIMT, while 92% had abnormal CIMT in either carotid artery. CIMT (R) measured 0.87±0.16 mm in the vitamin D deficient group, 0.87±0.2 mm in the insufficient group, and 0.7±0.2 mm in the normal vitamin D group (p<0.05). Similarly, CIMT (L) was 0.95±0.21 mm in the deficient group, 0.86±0.2 mm in the insufficient group, and 0.75±0.1 mm in the normal vitamin D group (p<0.05).

(Table/Fig 3) presents correlations between various parameters, including CIMT (R) and CIMT (L), with vitamin D levels. Age, BMI, and serum potassium positively correlated with vitamin D levels, with Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) of 0.247 (p-value 0.013), 0.358 (p-value <0.001), and 0.315 (p-value 0.001), respectively. Conversely, HbA1c, serum TG, CIMT (R), and CIMT (L) correlated negative correlations with vitamin D levels, with Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) of -0.025 (p-value 0.012), -0.274 (p-value 0.006), -0.284 (p-value 0.005), and -0.264 (p-value 0.008), respectively.

(Table/Fig 4),(Table/Fig 5) graphically illustrate the linear increase in CIMT with decreasing serum vitamin D levels.

Discussion

There is a rising concern regarding vitamin D deficiency due to its association with multiple medical disorders, with prevalence ranging from 50-94% in India (6),(7). The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency reported in the present study (73%) aligns with other Indian studies (71% and 81%) (9),(11). DM is an established risk factor for atherosclerotic diseases like coronary artery disease and cerebrovascular accidents. Vitamin D deficiency is prevalent among diabetics, often exacerbating atherosclerotic diseases due to its involvement in inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and immune cell recruitment (21). As carotid angiography is an invasive modality for diagnosing atherosclerosis, the measurement of CIMT using ultrasonography serves as an accessible and non invasive alternative (19).

The present study reveals a significant inverse relationship between vitamin D levels and CIMT, consistent with similar studies in different regions of India (9),(11),(12),(22), and clinical studies (13),(23),(24),(25),(26) and meta-analyses (19),(27),(28) conducted globally. An inverse correlation between vitamin D and CIMT was also observed among Type 1 DM patients, although it did not reach statistical significance (15). Similar findings were observed in another study involving the Brazilian population descended from African slaves (16). However, Choi YK et al., found no significant association between vitamin D status and CIMT but noted a significant negative correlation with carotid atherosclerosis, as measured by the presence of carotid plaques (17).

In the present study, the majority of patients with vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency were males, in line with the study by Mulatkar CP et al., (males, 54%) (9). Furthermore, Subramanian A et al., reported that diabetic males had significantly lower serum vitamin D concentrations compared to diabetic females (9.07 versus 12.6 ng/mL) (29).

According to Mantha S et al., the relative contribution to CIMT was maximum for smoking (41%), followed by the total cholesterol HDL ratio (34%) and vitamin D deficiency (25%) (11). Although 1 in 10 patients reported a history of smoking in the present study, it was not statistically significant among the deficient and insufficient groups. This finding aligns with the study by Wang Y and Zhang H (24).

Dyslipidemia was associated with vitamin D deficiency, although there are inconsistent results regarding the particular type of cholesterol molecule involved. Some studies show an association with LDL-cholesterol, while in others, neither total cholesterol nor HDL-cholesterol nor triglycerides were associated (17),(19),(24). In the present study, a higher Triglyceride (TG) level was significantly associated with vitamin D deficiency.

Similar inconclusive findings were observed for both Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and DBP. Choi YK et al., reported a significant difference in DBP (vitamin D deficient versus non deficient: 80.3 versus 74.6 mmHg), similar to the results in the current study (17).

However, neither DBP nor SBP values were statistically significant among the vitamin D deficient groups in the study by Wang Y and Zhang H (24).

According to Surdu AM et al., an inverse correlation was observed between vitamin D levels and serum total cholesterol, LDL, and triglyceride levels, whereas HDL levels correlated positively with vitamin D levels (18). Additionally, vitamin D supplementation in different dosages improved lipid parameters (18). However, supplementing Type 2 DM patients with vitamin D demonstrated a reduction in total cholesterol content within the monocytes, without affecting serum triglycerides, LDL cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol (18). Unlike other studies, present study demonstrated a negative correlation of all the lipid parameters with vitamin D levels.

Multiple randomised clinical trials and systematic reviews extend the controversy surrounding low-dose vitamin D supplementation, showing no effect on myocardial infarction, stroke, hyperlipidemia, insulin resistance, blood pressure, and, consequently, cardiovascular mortality (18),(30). However, another randomised clinical trial demonstrated that vitamin D supplementation, along with vitamin K and calcium, for diabetic patients with coronary artery disease had beneficial effects on CIMT (30). In addition to the inconsistencies in reports on vitamin D supplementation and atherosclerosis, some studies have reported that vitamin D deficiency is not independently associated with subclinical atherosclerosis among patients with SLE or non diabetic HIV patients (31),(32). Although vitamin D plays a significant role in multiple pathophysiological mechanisms involving infection, inflammation, and autoimmunity, there is a lack of consensus regarding its involvement in atherosclerosis.

Limitation(s)

The present study did not evaluate the vitamin D status in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis and Hyperosmolar hyperglycaemic state, which are extreme complications of Type 2 DM. Although patients receiving Teriparatide injections (recombinant parathyroid hormone) for osteoporosis were excluded, parathyroid hormone or serum calcium was not measured due to financial limitations. Furthermore, the present study did not evaluate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on CIMT. Conducting cohort or case-control studies to determine the cause-and-effect relationship between vitamin D and atherosclerosis is recommended. Additionally, multiple randomised clinical trials are recommended to estimate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on atherosclerosis.

Conclusion

The present study reports a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among patients with Type 2 DM. Male sex and patients with a family history of Type 2 Diabetes are commonly affected. Dyslipidemia is significantly associated with vitamin D deficiency. A significant inverse linear association was observed between vitamin D levels and CIMT, indicating its association with sub-clinical atherosclerosis. Although unproven in the present study, the effect of vitamin D supplementation on the improvement in atherosclerosis remains unclear. Hence, future studies are recommended for further evaluation of vitamin D supplementation in atherosclerosis.

References

1.
Verma S, Chaturvedi V, Ganguly NK, Mittal SA. Vitamin D deficiency: Concern for rheumatoid arthritis and COVID-19? Mol Cell Biochem. 2021;476(12):4351-62. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Ahmad S, Arora S, Khan S, Mohsin M, Mohan A, Manda K, et al. Vitamin-D and its therapeutic relevance in pulmonary diseases. J Nutr Biochem. Elsevier Inc.; 2021;90:108571. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Pal R, Banerjee M, Bhadada SK, Shetty AJ, Singh B, Vyas A. Vitamin-D supplementation and clinical outcomes in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endocrinol Invest. 2022;45(1):53-68. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Mohan M, Cherian JJ, Sharma A. Exploring links between Vitamin-D deficiency and COVID-19. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16(9):e1008874. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Islam MZ, Bhuiyan NH, Akhtaruzzaman M, Allardt CL, Fogelholm M. Vitamin-D deficiency in Bangladesh: A review of prevalence, causes and recommendations for mitigation. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2022;31(2):167-80.
6.
Aparna P, Muthathal S, Nongkynrih B, Gupta SK. Vitamin D deficiency in India. J Family Med Prim Care. 2018;7(2):324-30. Doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_78_18. PMID: 30090772; PMCID: PMC6060930. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Venkatesh U, Sharma A, Ananthan VA, Subbiah P, Durga R. Micronutrient’s deficiency in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nutr Sci. Cambridge University Press; 2021;10:e110. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Anyanwu AC, Olopade OB, Onung SI, Odeniyi IA, Coker HAB, Fasanmade OA, et al. Serum Vitamin-D levels in persons with Type 2 diabetes mellitus in Lagos, Nigeria. Int J Diabetes Clin Res. 2020;7(4):133. [crossref]
9.
Mulatkar CP, Singh R, Mahapatra H, Taneja A, Sharma N. Association of Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin-D Level with Carotid Artery Intima Media Thickness in Indian Patients of Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus. Saudi J Med Pharm Sci. 2017;3(10A):1051-57. Available from: http://scholarsmepub.com/sjmps/.
10.
Bashir F, Nageen A, Kidwai S, Ara J. Carotid intima-media thickness and cardiometabolic risk factors in Pakistani type 2 diabetics. Saudi J Health Sci. 2017;6(3):145-150. [crossref]
11.
Mantha S, Tripuraneni SL, Fleisher LA, Roizen MF, Mantha VRR, Dasari PR. Relative contribution of vitamin-D deficiency to subclinical atherosclerosis in Indian context: Preliminary findings. Medicine. 2021;100(32):e26916. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Chauduri J, Mridula K, Umamashesh M, Balaraju B, Bandaru V. Association of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin-D in carotid intima-media thickness: A study from South India. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2017;20(3):242-47. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Carrelli AL, Walker MD, Lowe H, McMahon DJ, Rundek T, Sacco RL, et al. Vitamin-D deficiency is associated with subclinical carotid atherosclerosis: The Northern Manhattan Study. Stroke. 2011;42(8):2240-45. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Targher G, Bertolini L, Padovani R, Zenari L, Scala L, Cigolini M, et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin-D3 concentrations and carotid artery intima-media thickness among type 2 diabetic patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2006;65(5):593-97. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02633.x. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Taskiran B, Cansu GB, Bahadir E, Mutluay R. Role of Vitamin-D in intima media thickness in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Natl Med Assoc. 2017;109(1):14-20. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Monteiro Júnior FC, Mandarino NR, Santos EM, Santos AM, Salgado JV, Brito DJA, et al. Correlation between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin-D levels and carotid intima-media thickness in a Brazilian population descended from African slaves. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2018;51(4):e7185. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29490002/. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Choi YK, Song SW, Shin BR, Kim JA, Kim HN. Serum vitamin-D level is negatively associated with carotid atherosclerosis in Korean adults. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2017;68(1):90-96. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Surdu AM, Pînzariu O, Ciobanu DM, Negru AG, Cainap SS, Lazea C, et al. Vitamin-D and its role in the lipid metabolism and the development of atherosclerosis. Biomedicines. 2021;9(2):172. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Lupoli R, Vaccaro A, Ambrosino P, Poggio P, Amato M, Di Minno MND. Impact of Vitamin-D deficiency on subclinical carotid atherosclerosis: A pooled analysis of cohort studies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(7):2146-53. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28609831/. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Bhadra R, Choudhuri AR, Hazra A, Mukhopadhyay JD. Serum vitamin-D level and its relation with carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetic patients: A cross-sectional observational study. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2016;10(2 Suppl 1):S55-59. Doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2016.01.025. Epub 2016 Jan 15. PMID: 26818693. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Kim DH, Meza CA, Clarke H, Kim JS, Hickner RC. Vitamin-D and endothelial function. Nutrients. 2020;12(2):575. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Giri R, Rai R, Verma S, Verma RK. Correlation between vitamin-D and carotid artery intima media thickness in patients with ischemic stroke. Int J Adv Med. 2016;64(1):398-401. [crossref]
23.
Hua CR, Zhen JX, Jiang Q, Gu Z, Gu P li, Zhou B, et al. Correlations between serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin-D and carotid atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes in Shanghai. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2014;75(4):206-12. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25168108/. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Wang Y, Zhang H. Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin-D3 levels are associated with carotid intima-media thickness and carotid atherosclerotic plaque in Type 2 diabetic patients. J Diabetes Res. 2017:2017:3510275. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC5387802/. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Winckler K, Tarnow L, Lundby-Christensen L, Almdal TP, Wiinberg N, Eiken P, et al. Vitamin-D, carotid intima-media thickness and bone structure in patients with type 2 diabetes. Endocr Connect. 2015;4(2):128-35. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25956908/. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Aydin E, Altin C, Özcan Söylev G, Tekindal MA, Ağildere M. Assessment of subclinical atherosclerosis in Vitamin-D deficiency. Ultrasound Q. 2019;35(2):142-46. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Chen FH, Liu T, Xu L, Zhang L, Zhou XB. Association of serum vitamin-D level and carotid atherosclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ultrasound Med. 2018;37(6):1293-1303. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Säidifard N, Tangestani H, Djafarian K, Shab-Bidar S. Serum Vitamin-D level and carotid intima-media thickness: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized control trials. Horm Metab Res. 2020;52(5):305-15. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Subramanian A, Nigam P, Misra A, Pandey RM, Mathur M, Gupta R, et al. Severe vitamin-D deficiency in patients with Type 2 diabetes in north India. Diabetes Management. 2011;1(5):477-83. [crossref]
30.
Asemi Z, Raygan F, Bahmani F, Rezavandi Z, Talari HR, Rafiee M, et al. The effects of vitamin-D, K and calcium co-supplementation on carotid intima-media thickness and metabolic status in overweight type 2 diabetic patients with CHD. Br J Nutr. 2016;116(2):286-93. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007114516001847/type/journal_article.[crossref][PubMed]
31.
Kiani AN, Fang H, Magder LS, Petri M. Vitamin-D deficiency does not predict progression of coronary artery calcium, carotid intima-media thickness or high-sensitivity c-reactive protein in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013;52(11):2071-76. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Portilla J, Moreno-Pérez Ó, Serna-Candel C, Escoín C, Alfayate R, Reus S, et al. Vitamin-D insufficiency and subclinical atherosclerosis in non-diabetic males living with HIV. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17(1):18945.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/65406.18966

Date of Submission: May 13, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Aug 04, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Oct 11, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 17, 2023
• Manual Googling: Sep 13, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Oct 07, 2023 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com