Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 209015

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : January | Volume : 18 | Issue : 1 | Page : LC01 - LC04 Full Version

Impact of COVID-19 Vaccines on Mortality Rates among Adult COVID-19 Patients


Published: January 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/64633.18879
Mandar R Sane, Harshita Verma

1. Associate Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 2. Undergraduate Student, Department of Forensic Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Mandar R Sane,
Associate Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Nagpur-441108, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: drmrsane@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been a public health concern since 2019. Multiple strategies have been implemented to flatten the curve of cases, including isolating active cases, contact tracing, quarantines, lockdowns, hand hygiene, face mask usage, and sanitisation. Vaccination has been used as a tool to reduce morbidity and mortality due to COVID-19.

Aim: To analyse the impact of COVID-19 vaccines on mortality rates among COVID-19 patients, with a secondary objective of studying the association between age, time since vaccination, and mortality rates.

Materials and Methods: The present cohort study was conducted in the Department of Forsenic Medicine at All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Nagpur, Maharashtra,India, with a sample size of 60 cases, out of which 30 were included. Data was collected over a six month period from January 1, 2022, to June 30, 2022. The study included adult COVID-19 patients who were admitted to AIIMS Nagpur and subsequently died. Data on vaccine type, dose, and time since vaccination were also collected.

Results: The mean age of patients was 53 years. Of the patients, 63.3% (n=57) were males and 36.6% (n=33) were females. Among the patients, 60% were vaccinated, while 40% were unvaccinated. Among the vaccinated patients, 14.8% received Covaxin, while 85.1% received Covishield. Regarding the vaccination dosage, 9.2% of the patients received a single dose, while 90.7% received two doses. All the patients who survived COVID-19 had been vaccinated for more than one month.

Conclusion: Vaccination resulted in a 93.1% reduction in the odds of death among vaccinated patients. Among the unvaccinated patients, 80% died due to COVID-19. After adjusting for age and co-morbidities, vaccination was found to be independently associated with a lower risk of mortality (p<0.001). Furthermore, 73.3% of the deceased cases had co-morbidities (p<0.001). The study demonstrates the protective effect of vaccination with either Covishield or Covaxin, which should hopefully address any misconceptions among the general public.

Keywords

Coronavirus disease 2019, Mortality decline, Potency of vaccine

Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) is a highly contagious disease caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). It is known worldwide due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and has raised concerns among health authorities since 2019. India diagnosed its first case in January 2020 (1). By January 2022, the pandemic had caused around 44 million cases and five lakh deaths (2). The COVID-19 pandemic followed a wave pattern globally, with the first wave in September 2020, the second wave in April-May 2021, and the third wave in December 2021-January 2022 (3).

Multiple strategies were implemented to flatten the curve of cases, including the isolation of active cases, contact tracing, quarantines, lockdowns, following hand hygiene, wearing face masks, and sanitisation, among others. The development of vaccines had the potential to prevent severe diseases and decrease mortality.

In India, vaccination began on January 16, 2021, with the use of Covishield (AstraZeneca) and Covaxin (Bharat Biotech) for the mass vaccination program. Covishield is the non replicating chimpanzee Adenovirus Vaccine Vector ChAdOx1, manufactured by the Serum Institute of India in collaboration with the University of Oxford and AstraZeneca, while Covaxin is the inactivated-virus vaccine BBV152, developed by Bharat Biotech International (4). The vaccination drive was implemented in a phased manner. Untill September 22, 80% of administered vaccine doses were Covishield, 35% Covaxin, and 4% Corbevax (5). In October 2022, India administered over 2.19 billion doses, including first, second, and booster doses (6). Since then, the mortality curve has flattened to a great extent. Several Indian studies were conducted to evaluate Vaccine Effectiveness (VE) in preventing virus infection, reducing hospital stay, severe COVID-19 disease, or mortality. Ghosh S et al., conducted a cohort study on the Indian population to check the effectiveness of the Covishield vaccine and claimed that the vaccine provided 93% protection against COVID-19 and a 98% reduction in mortality (7). Another multicentric hospital-based case-control study conducted by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) to evaluate the effectiveness of Covishield and Covaxin showed that the VE of complete vaccination was 85% (95% CI: 79-89%) and 71% (95% CI: 57-81%), respectively (8). In a case-control study at JIPMER, VE following any number of vaccine doses was found to be 95% (44%-100%) in preventing moderately severe disease (9).

Comparative analysis of mortality due to COVID-19 in vaccinated subjects who have received either the first dose of the vaccine or are fully vaccinated is not well reported, particularly regarding its association with factors such as age group or co-morbidities. The present study aims to examine the impact of COVID-19 vaccination in preventing deaths due to COVID-19. Secondary objectives of present study are to investigate the association of age, co-morbidities, and time since vaccination with mortality rates due to COVID-19 in vaccinated and unvaccinated patients.

Material and Methods

This was a cohort study conducted at AIIMS Nagpur, Maharashtra India over a period of six months, from January 1, 2022, to June 30, 2022. The study commenced after obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC), AIIMS Nagpur (EC/NEW/INST/2020/548).

Sample size calculation: Based on previous literature and assuming a vaccination proportion of 56.1% in the control group and 28.7% in the cases (8), with a study power of 80%, a case-to-control ratio of 1:2, and a two-sided confidence interval (1-α) of 95, the calculated sample size was 37 cases and 74 controls. However, considering the feasibility of a hospital-based study, the sample size was considered as 30 cases and 60 controls. Therefore, 30 deaths that occurred at AIIMS Nagpur hospital due to COVID-19 were included as cases, while 60 cases that were admitted due to COVID-19 but recovered were included as controls. A consecutive sampling technique was used for sampling.

Inclusion criteria: The study included deaths occurring due to COVID-19 or its complications in adult patients admitted to the hospital.

Exclusion criteria: Deaths occurring due to unnatural causes in COVID-19 patients and patients for whom vaccination details were not provided were excluded.

Study Procedure

Data was collected from the Medical Certificate of Cause of Death (MCCD) issued for deaths due to COVID-19 at AIIMS Nagpur. The data included age, gender, existing co-morbidities, and duration of hospital stay. A predesigned study proforma was used for data collection. Information on the vaccination status of the patients (first/second dose, Covaxin/Covishield, and time since receiving the dose of the vaccine) was collected from the treatment file of the patients admitted at AIIMS Nagpur. The admission criteria for these patients were determined by the institute’s policy, which included patients with at least two of the following symptoms: fever (temperature ≥38°C), chills, myalgia, headache, sore throat, or new olfactory or taste disorder, or those who had at least one respiratory sign or symptom (including cough, shortness of breath, or clinical or radiographic evidence of pneumonia) and at least one Severse Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-positive nasopharyngeal swab. The post-dose period was categorised as 0-31 days and more than 31 days.

Statistical Analysis

The data was collated in MS Excel, and descriptive statistics were used for analysis. VE was calculated as (1-Odds ratio) × 100% (9). The qualitative data were evaluated using Pearson’s Chi-square test or Fisher’s-exact test. Matched pair analysis was conducted, and multivariable conditional logistic regression was performed to calculate the adjusted odds ratio. The factors used for adjustment were vaccination status, presence of comorbidity, and age.

Results

The present was a cohort study that enrolled 30 deaths due to COVID-19 as cases and 60 survivors of COVID-19 infection as controls. The mean age of the participants was 53 years. Among the patients, 63.3% (n=57) were males, while 36.6% (n=33) were females (Table/Fig 1).

Among the vaccinated patients, 14.8% were vaccinated with Covaxin, while 85.1% were vaccinated with Covishield (Table/Fig 2). There was a 93.1% reduction in the odds of deaths in vaccinated patients. Among the unvaccinated patients, 80% died due to COVID-19, while among the vaccinated patients, 80% survived (p<0.01). Regarding the vaccination status, 9.2% of the patients had received a single dose of vaccination, while 90.7% of patients had received two doses of vaccination (Table/Fig 2). All the patients who survived the COVID-19 infection were found to be vaccinated for more than one month (Table/Fig 3). Of the patients, 52.2% had no comorbidity, while 47.7% of cases had co-morbidities. However, 73.3% of cases who died due to COVID-19 had co-morbidities (p<0.001).

Multivariate regression analysis of independent parameters such as vaccination, co-morbidities, and age showed that the adjusted odds ratio for vaccination was significant with a p-value <0.001 (Table/Fig 4).

Discussion

The results of present case-control study indicate that vaccination significantly reduced the risk of mortality among COVID-19 patients aged 18 years and above who were admitted to the hospital. There was a 93.1% reduction in the odds of deaths in vaccinated patients. Among the unvaccinated patients, 80% died due to COVID-19, while among the vaccinated patients, 80% survived. The VE was calculated to be 93.1% (1-adjusted odds ratio).

It is important to note that all cases and controls included in present study were above 18 years of age. While 18 years of age was considered as the benchmark, the current vaccination program in India includes individuals above 12 years of age. Additionally, there were no deaths reported in the hospital statistics for patients between 12 to 18 years of age. Lopez Bernal J et al., included individuals above 70 years in their study (10), while Bhatnagar T et al., conducted a case-control study on patients above 45 years of age (8), and Desai A et al., included patients above 18 years of age (4).

In the present study, 63.3% (n=57) of the patients were males, while 36.6% (n=33) were females. The higher representation of male patients in the study may be attributed to their higher engagement in outdoor activities, which may increase the risk of acquiring COVID-19 infection. It is important to note that the VIN-WIN study (7) included only male participants. Therefore, the results of the VIN-WIN study cannot be directly compared to the findings of the present study in terms of gender.

Vaccination Status

The present study is unique as it is a cohort study where both cases and controls were individuals suffering from COVID-19 and admitted to the hospital. In contrast, studies by Lopez Bernal J et al., and Dagan N et al., which also investigated mortality as an outcome, considered vaccinated patients as cases and unvaccinated patients as controls (10),(11). Lopez Bernal J et al., found that vaccination with one dose significantly reduced symptomatic COVID-19 in older adults and provided further protection against severe disease (10). Dagan N et al., studied vaccine efficacy and reported higher effectiveness for more serious outcomes such as hospitalisation, severe illness, and death (11). On the other hand, studies by Bhatnagar T et al., and Pramod S et al., considered COVID-19 positive cases and COVID-19 negative individuals as controls (8),(9). The present study directly measures the reduction in odds of mortality in vaccinated patients. The odds ratio is 0.063, with a 95% confidence interval (0.021-0.187), while the adjusted odds ratio is 0.069, with a confidence interval of (0.020-0.237). The adjustment was done for age and co-morbidities. The study showed a 93.1% reduction in the odds of deaths in vaccinated patients. Among the unvaccinated patients, 80% died due to COVID-19, while among the vaccinated patients, 80% survived. The VE was calculated to be 93.1%. In India, deaths due to COVID-19 account for 1.18% of all cases, but this constitutes 5,29,008 deaths nationwide as of October 2022 (12).

Vaccine Efficacy/Effectiveness Studies

Various studies have been conducted to report vaccine efficacy/effectiveness. The vaccination trial results of Covaxin showed 93% efficacy against severe COVID-19 (13). Real-world estimates of VE should take into account various factors such as storage and cold chain maintenance, incomplete delivery of doses, and emerging variants of the virus. Real-world studies have been conducted to evaluate the impact of vaccines on preventing breakthrough infections (9),(14), hospital stay (4),(15), severity of disease (8), and mortality outcomes (7),(10),(11). These studies are summarised in (Table/Fig 5) (7),(8),(10),(15).

In the present study, the VE {(VE) (1-adjusted odds ratio)×100} was found to be 93.1%, and there was a 93.1% reduction in the odds of deaths in vaccinated patients. Among the unvaccinated patients, 80% died due to COVID-19. These findings are comparable to other studies. Ghosh S et al., reported a VE of 98.53% (95% CI, 0.00-99.99) (7), while Dagan N et al., reported it as 92% (95% CI, 75 to 100) (11).

The impact of the vaccine also depends on the number of doses administered and the time since vaccination. Studies by Desai A et al., and Lopez Bernal J et al., evaluated the impact of vaccines after a single dose of vaccination (4),(10). However, other studies evaluated the impact of vaccines after the first dose and subsequently after the second dose (7),(8),(9). The evidence from the present study aligns with the observations of Bhatnagar T et al., where the efficacy of vaccines was found to be 85% (95% CI: 79-89%) with Covishield and 71% (95% CI: 57-81%) with Covaxin (8). Regarding the mortality outcome, Dagan N et al., reported a vaccine efficacy of 72% (95% CI, 19 to 100) after the first dose of the vaccine, which improved to 92% (95% CI, 75 to 100) after the second dose of vaccination (11).

In the present study, it was found that all the patients who survived the COVID-19 infection had been vaccinated for more than one month. Bhatnagar T et al., reported that VE was highest between 6-8 weeks after the administration of Covishield (94%, 95% CI: 86-97%) and Covaxin (93%, 95% CI: 34-99%) (8). Similarly, Dagan N et al., observed an increase in vaccine efficacy with an increase in the duration since vaccination (11). In the present study, an arbitrary limit for the time since vaccination (<1 month or >1 month) was decided based on the findings of Ghosh S et al., where the mean duration between the first and second dose in cases who subsequently tested positive was 31.43 days (7).

In the present study, 54 patients (60%) were vaccinated. Among them, 46 patients (85.1%) received Covishield, while eight patients (14.8%) received Covaxin. These proportions corresponded with the national vaccination database, where Covishield constituted 80%, Covaxin accounted for 16%, and other vaccines constituted 4% (6). No deaths were recorded among the patients who received Covaxin. Of the patients who received Covishield, 83% survived, while 17% succumbed to COVID-19. Although our analysis did show protection against mortality after vaccination with Covishield/Covaxin, the numbers for each type of vaccine were too few to draw any statistical conclusions.

Multivariate regression analysis was performed to investigate whether significant differences in independent parameters could obscure an association with COVID-19 mortality. After adjusting for age and co-morbidities, vaccination was found to be independently associated with a lower risk of mortality (p<0.001), with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.069 (95% CI, 0.020-0.237). This finding was consistent with the observations of Desai A et al., (4).

The present study provides evidence of the impact of vaccines in preventing deaths due to COVID-19. It will help establish vaccines as effective tools in the fight against COVID-19 in future waves and variants. The findings of present study can contribute to public education and awareness campaigns about the importance of vaccination.

Limitation(s)

Authors did not consider whether the patients admitted to the hospital were experiencing reinfection of COVID-19, and this is particularly significant in drawing conclusions for unvaccinated patients. Another limitation of the present study is the smaller sample size.

Conclusion

Vaccination resulted in a 93.1% reduction in the odds of death in vaccinated patients, leading to a VE of 93.1% for COVID-19 mortality. Among unvaccinated patients, 80% died due to COVID-19. Although the results demonstrate protection against mortality after vaccination with Covishield/Covaxin, the numbers for each type of vaccine are insufficient to draw statistical conclusions. After adjusting for age and co-morbidities, vaccination was found to be independently associated with a lower risk of mortality (p<0.001). Among the cases who died due to COVID-19, 73.3% had co-morbidities (p<0.001).

The findings of present study will help alleviate fears or misconceptions about vaccines among the general population. The data generated by present study will also contribute to further research on mortality patterns in vaccinated or unvaccinated COVID-19 patients.

References

1.
Andrews MA, Areekal B, Rajesh KR, Krishnan J, Suryakala R, Krishnan B, et al. First confirmed case of COVID-19 infection in India: A case report. Indian J Med Res. 2020;151(5): 490-92. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Mathieu E, Ritchie H, Rodés-Guirao L, Appel C, Giattino C, Hasell J, et al. Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19). Our World in Data [Internet]. 2020 Mar 5 [cited 2022 Oct 28]; Available from: https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus.
3.
India: WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard with Vaccination Data [Internet]. [cited 2022 Oct 28]. Available from: https://covid19.who.int.
4.
Desai A, Desai P, Mehta J, Sachora W, Bharti N, Patel T, et al. Measuring the impact of a single dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (recombinant) coronavirus vaccine on hospital stay, ICU requirement, and mortality outcome in a tertiary care centre. Int J Infect Dis. 2021:113:282-87. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
India: COVID-19 vaccines administered by vaccine type 2022 [Internet]. Statista. [cited 2022 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1248301/ india-covid-19vaccines-administered-by-vaccine-type/.
6.
CoWIN Dashboard [Internet]. [cited 2022 Oct 28]. Available from: https:// dashboard.cowin.gov.in/.
7.
Ghosh S, Shankar S, Chatterjee K, Chatterjee K, Yadav AK, Pandya K, et al. COVISHIELD (AZD1222) Vaccine effectiveness among healthcare and frontline Workers of Indian Armed Forces: Interim results of VIN-WIN cohort study. Med J Armed Forces India. 2021;77(Suppl 2):S264-70. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Bhatnagar T, Chaudhuri S, Ponnaiah M, Yadav PD, Sabarinathan R, Sahay RR, et al. Effectiveness of BBV152/Covaxin and AZD1222/Covishield vaccines against severe COVID-19 and B.1.617.2/Delta variant in India, 2021: A multi-centric hospital-based case-control study. Int J Infect Dis. 2022;122:693-702. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Pramod S, Govindan D, Ramasubramani P, Kar SS, Aggarwal R, Manoharan N, et al. Effectiveness of Covishield vaccine in preventing Covid-19- A test-negative case-control study. Vaccine. 2022;40(24):3294-97. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Lopez Bernal J, Andrews N, Gower C, Robertson C, Stowe J, Tessier E, et al. Effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines on covid-19 related symptoms, hospital admissions, and mortality in older adults in England: Test negative case-control study. BMJ. 2021;373:n1088. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Dagan N, Barda N, Kepten E, Miron O, Perchik S, Katz MA, et al. BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine in a nationwide mass vaccination setting. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(15):1412-23. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
#IndiaFightsCorona COVID-19 [Internet]. MyGov.in. 2020 [cited 2022 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.mygov.in/covid-19/.
13.
Ella R, Vadrevu KM, Jogdand H, Prasad S, Reddy S, Sarangi V, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBV152: A double-blind, randomised, phase 1 trial. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2021;21(5):637-46. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Tyagi K, Ghosh A, Nair D, Dutta K, Singh Bhandari P, Ahmed Ansari I, et al. Breakthrough COVID-19 infections after vaccinations in healthcare and other workers in a chronic care medical facility in New Delhi, India. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021;15(3):1007-08. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Vasileiou E, Simpson CR, Shi T, Kerr S, Agrawal U, Akbari A, et al. Interim findings from first-dose mass COVID-19 vaccination roll-out and COVID-19 hospital admissions in Scotland: A national prospective cohort study. The Lancet. 2021;397(10285):1646-57.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/64633.18879

Date of Submission: Apr 11, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jul 18, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Nov 14, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 14, 2023
• Manual Googling: Nov 08, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Nov 10, 2023 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com