Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 37019

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2024 | Month : January | Volume : 18 | Issue : 1 | Page : ER01 - ER05 Full Version

Atypical Morphological Presentation of Neoplastic Plasma Cells: A Series of Five Cases


Published: January 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/67679.18959
Vinoth Kumar Ganesamoorthy, Rutvi Gautam Dave, Elanthenral Sigamani, Anup J Devasia, Sukesh C Nair, Madhavi Maddali, Praveen Kumar Chinniah

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Trichy SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Trichy, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Transfusion Medicine and Immunohaematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Professor, Department of General Pathology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Professor, Department of Clinical Haematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India. 5. Professor, Department of Transfusion Medicine and Immunohaematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India. 6. Assistant Professor, Department of Clinical Haematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India. 7. Assistant Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Rutvi Gautam Dave,
Associate Professor, Department of Transfusion Medicine and Immunohaematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore-632002, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: rutvidave87@gmail.com

Abstract

The diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma (MM) is made by demonstration clonal plasma cells in Bone Marrow (BM) aspiration/biopsy, in addition to assessing serum biochemical parameters, conducting radiological examinations, and considering the clinical presentation. In most cases, predominantly mature plasma cells are observed, along with scattered immature forms in the BM. Several morphological variants of plasma cells have been reported, including Auer rod-like inclusions, small lymphocyte-like cells, hairy cell-like cells, anaplastic variants, promonocyte-like cells, crystal-storing histiocytes, Burkitt-like cells, and blastoid cells. In this series of five cases, most showed a typical clinical presentation and laboratory findings suggestive of plasma cell dyscrasia. However, the morphology of each case exhibited unusual morphological variants, posing diagnostic challenges. These variants included Auer rod-like inclusions, small lymphocytes/lymph-plasmacytoid cells, hairy-like cells, multilobulated nuclei, and anaplastic variants mimicking dysplastic megakaryocytes, leading to various differential diagnoses. The age range of these cases was 57-76 years. Most of the cases presented with generalised dull aching body pain. Imaging studies revealed lytic lesions involving various parts of the bone, including the skull, ribs, vertebrae, and femur. Biochemical assays suggested the possibility of plasma cell dyscrasia. Two of the cases had primary Plasma Cell Leukaemia (PCL), which is a rare and highly aggressive plasma cell neoplasm. The anaplastic variant is associated with a poor prognosis, aiding in predicting treatment responses. However, due to the unusual morphological presentation, the diagnosis of MM or PCL was made after conducting ancillary studies such as Serum Protein Electrophoresis (SPEP), serum free light chain assay, Immunofixation Electrophoresis (IFE), and immunophenotyping through Immunohistochemistry (IHC) or flow cytometry.

Keywords

Bone marrow, Flow cytometry, Immunohistochemistry, Plasma cell

Multiple Myeloma (MM) is characterised by the monoclonal proliferation of plasma cells. Signs and symptoms of these patients are related to renal damage caused by an excess of light chain or the infiltration of immunoglobulin-producing plasma cells into the organs. Common presentations of MM include fatigue, bone pain, hypercalcaemia, elevated serum protein or creatinine, and anaemia. The diagnosis of MM is made according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG-2014): ≥10 percent clonal plasma cells in the BM or biopsy-proven bony or soft tissue plasmacytoma plus one or more of the following myeloma-defining events. One of the myeloma-defining events is organ or tissue impairment that can be attributed to the plasma cell proliferative disorder (e.g., increased calcium, kidney impairment, anaemia, lytic bone lesions). Another myeloma-defining event is a biomarker associated with near-inevitable progression to end-organ damage (i.e., ≥60 percent clonal plasma cells in the BM; involved/uninvolved free light chain ratio of 100 or more {the involved free light chain level must also be at least 100 mg/L or more}; or MRI with more than one focal lesion) (1).

Diagnosing conventional mature or immature plasma cells in morphology may not be difficult. However, several morphological variants of plasma cells have been reported, including Auer rodlike inclusion (2), small lymphocyte-like cells (3), hairy cell-like cells (4), anaplastic variants (5), promonocytes-like cell (6), crystalstoring histiocytes (7), Burkitt-like cells (8), and blastoid cells (9).

These morphological variations pose considerable diagnostic challenges for the pathologist. Present study observed the following five morphological variants of MM, which include Auer rod-like inclusions, small lymphocytes/lympho-plasmacytoid-like cells, hairy cell-like cells, plasma cells with multilobulated nuclei, and cells resembling dysplastic megakaryocytes. Ancillary investigations like serum electrophoresis, serum-free light chain assay, SPEP, IFE, and immunophenotyping by IHC or flow cytometry complement the diagnosis.

Case Report

This series summarises five atypical plasma cell morphologies in five different patients with MM who presented to the Department of Haematology at Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021. Diagnostic reporting was performed by the departments of transfusion medicine and immunohaematology, general pathology, radiodiagnosis, and molecular haematology. Most of the cases presented with generalised dull aching body pain. Imaging studies showed lytic lesions involving various parts of the bone, ranging from the skull, ribs, vertebrae, and femur. Biochemical assays suggested the possibility of plasma cell dyscrasia. However, due to the unusual morphological presentation, the diagnosis of MM or PCL was made after conducting IHC and flow cytometry. In all these cases, the diagnosis of MM was based on the IMWG-2014 diagnostic criteria (1).

Case 1

A 63-year-old male, known to be hypertensive and on antihypertensive medication for 10 years, as well as having type 2 diabetes mellitus and taking oral hypoglycaemic agents for two years, experienced intermittent, sharp, severe back pain for two months (Table/Fig 1)a. Imaging studies revealed multiple lytic lesions over the thoracic vertebrae. Other relevant investigations showed anaemia (9 g/dL, normal range 13-17 g/dL), increased β2 microglobulin (6.7 mg/L, normal range 0.8 to 2.2 mg/L), elevated calcium (11.2 mg/dL, normal range 8.3 to 10.4 mg/dL), positive Bence Jones Protein (BJP), an increased κ/λ ratio (140, normal κ/λ ratio 0.26 to 1.65), an M band in SPEP (SPEP-1.9 G%) and IFE with IgG kappa (Table/Fig 2). Bone marrow aspirate revealed atypical plasma cells (57%) with Auer rod-like inclusions (Table/Fig 3)a. On IHC, these cells showed positive expression for CD38 (Table/Fig 4)g. The diagnosis of MM was made based on the above findings. The patient was lost to follow-up.

Case 2

A 76-year-old male, known to have type 2 diabetes mellitus for 12 years and taking oral hypoglycaemic agents, as well as having bilateral osteoarthritis of the knee joint and using analgesics, presented with a three-month history of 10 kg weight loss, a firm, non tender swelling of size 1×1 cm on the left side of the neck, and dull aching body pain. Relevant investigations revealed (Table/Fig 2) anaemia (10.5 g/dL, normal range 13-17 g/dL), mildly elevated creatinine (1.49 mg/dL, normal range 0.7 to 1.4 mg/dL), and increased β2M (10.59 mg/L, normal range 0.8 to 2.2 mg/L). Bence Jones Protein was negative. SPEP and IFE were normal. Imaging studies revealed multiple lytic lesions over the ribs and lumbar vertebrae (Table/Fig 1)b. The Peripheral Smear (PS) showed small lymphocytes/lymphoplasmacytoid-like plasma cells (92%). Bone marrow aspirate was inadequate (Table/Fig 3)c,d. Bone marrow trephine biopsy showed solidly cellular marrow with medium-sized atypical lymphoid cells with an irregular nuclear membrane, coarse chromatin, inconspicuous nucleoli, and scant cytoplasm. On flowcytometry, atypical cells showed strong positive staining for CD138, MUM1 with kappa light chain restriction, and negative for CD3 and CD20 (Table/Fig 4)a-f. Flow cytometry showed positive expression for CD138 and CD38 with kappa light chain restriction. In view of the peripheral blood showing ≥5 plasma cells, the diagnosis of PCL was made. The patient died during the first hospital admission due to refractory shock and cardiac arrest.

Case 3

A 60-year-old male with no co-morbid conditions presented with weight loss and dull aching generalised body pain for two months. Imaging studies revealed multiple lytic lesions over the skull (Table/Fig 1)c and lumbar vertebrae. Investigations revealed (Table/Fig 2) anaemia (8 g/dL, normal range 13-17g/dL) and increased β2m (8.13 mg/L, normal range 0.8 to 2.2 mg/L). Serum Protein Electrophoresis (SPEP), Immunofixation Electrophoresis (IFE), creatinine, and calcium were normal. Bence Jones Protein was negative. The Peripheral Smear (PS) showed lymphoid-like cells (84%) with irregular membrane projection (Hairy cell-like) (Table/Fig 3)e,f. Bone marrow trephine biopsy showed diffuse and interstitial infiltrates of atypical cells. These cells are small to medium-sized plasmacytoid cells with a high N/C ratio, coarse chromatin, and scant cytoplasm (Table/Fig 4)h. On Immunohistochemistry (IHC), atypical cells showed positive expression for MUM1. Flow cytometry showed positive expression for CD138, CD38 with kappa restriction. In view of the peripheral blood showing ≥5 plasma cells, the diagnosis of PCL was made, and the patient was lost to follow-up.

Case 4

A 68-year-old female, known to be hypertensive and on antihypertensive medication for five years, and with chronic kidney disease undergoing haemodialysis for one year, presented with generalised dull aching body pain for 20 days and decreased urine output for 10 days. Imaging studies showed multiple lytic lesions over the skull (Table/Fig 1)d. The patient had anaemia (5.7 g/dL, normal range 11-15 g/dL for females), markedly elevated creatinine (20.84 mg/dL, normal range 0.5 to 1.1 mg/dL for females), increased β2 M (4.32 mg/L, normal range 0.8 to 2.2 mg/L), increased calcium (11.9 mg/dL, normal range 8.3 to 10.4 mg/dL), positive biclonal Bence Jones Protein, an increased κ/λ ratio (540, normal κ/λ ratio 0.26 to 1.65), an M band (6.68 G%) in Serum Protein Electrophoresis (SPEP) and Immunofixation Electrophoresis (IFE) with IgG kappa and IgA kappa (Table/Fig 2). Bone marrow aspirate showed plasma cells (60%) that were predominantly mature and displayed multilobulated nuclei (Table/Fig 3)g. On Immunohistochemistry (IHC), atypical cells showed positive expression for CD138 and MUM1, and were negative for CD3 and CD20. Fluorescence In Situ Hybridisation (FISH) was negative for tp53 mutation. The diagnosis of MM was made based on all findings. The patient was treated with cyclophosphamide and bortezomib and survived for one year, then was lost to follow-up.

Case 5

A 57-year-old man, a known to have diabetes and hypertension for four years and on regular oral medication, presented with easy fatigability for one month. Imaging studies showed a solitary lytic lesion in the proximal diaphysis of the right femur (Table/Fig 1)e,d. Investigations revealed anaemia (7.2 g/dL, normal range 13-17 g/dL), increased β2M (7.83 mg/L, normal range 0.8 to 2.2 mg/L), and an M band (2.91G%) in serum Protein Electrophoresis (SPEP) and Immunofixation Electrophoresis (IFE) showed IgG lambda. The κ/λ ratio was deranged (0.03, normal κ/λ ratio 0.26 to 1.65). Urine Bence Jones Protein was positive (Table/Fig 2). Bone marrow aspirate showed large atypical cells (49%) with markedly pleomorphic bulbous nuclei resembling dysplastic megakaryocytes (Table/Fig 3)h. Bone marrow trephine biopsy also showed atypical cells with eccentrically placed hyperchromatic, lobated and pleomorphic nuclei with clumped chromatin and moderate amounts of pale eosinophilic cytoplasm (Table/Fig 3)i. On Immunohistochemistry (IHC), atypical cells were positive for CD138 and MUM1 and negative for CD61. Fluorescence In situ Hybridisation (FISH) was positive for tp53 mutation (Table/Fig 4)i. The diagnosis of MM was made based on all findings. The patient died during hospital admission due to septic shock. All the above five cases have been summarised in (Table/Fig 2).

Discussion

The diagnosis of MM may not be difficult; however, it poses diagnostic challenges when the morphological appearance is uncommon. In this series of five cases, most of them showed a typical clinical presentation and laboratory findings suggestive of plasma cell dyscrasia. However, the morphology of each case showed unusual morphological variants, causing diagnostic challenges.

The age group of these cases ranged from 57 to 76. Most of the cases presented with dull aching generalised body pain. Case 2 presented with weight loss and neck swelling. X-rays revealed lytic lesions involving the skull, ribs, and vertebrae (cases 1-4), and case 5 showed a lytic lesion in the right femur. All cases showed anaemia and increased β2m. M bands in SPEP and Bence Jones Protein in the urine were positive in cases 1, 4, and 5, and negative in cases 2 and 3. Cases 2 and 4 also had elevated creatinine, and cases 1, 3, and 5 showed normal levels. Cases 1 and 4 had hypercalcaemia, and cases 2, 3, and 5 showed normal calcium levels. All cases had kappa light chain restriction, except case 5, which showed lambda light chain restriction. In all cases, atypical cells showed positive expression for CD138 by IHC. Immunophenotyping by flow cytometry was available for case 2 and case 3, which showed positive expression for CD138 and CD38 monoclonal antibodies. Molecular studies were available for cases 4 and 5. Case 04 tested negative for 17p (tp53) deletion by FISH, whereas case 05 showed deletion (17p).

The first case of this series shows Auer rod-like inclusions within the mature and immature plasma cells. This may cause morphological confusion in resource-limited settings when differentiating from acute myeloid leukaemia. Auer rod-like inclusions are made up of lysosomal enzyme deposition (2). This is particularly seen in MM with kappa light chain restriction. As similar to literature, this case also showed kappa light type paraprotein.

Case 2 and 3 were diagnosed as PCL, which is a much rarer form of MM. The diagnosis of PCL is made when plasma cells are ≥5 percent of the manual white blood cell differential count on a conventional peripheral blood smear, along with diagnostic criteria for MM. PCL is subclassified based on clinical presentation as primary PCL and secondary PCL. Primary PCL is considered when it presents “de novo” in patients with no evidence of previous MM, whereas in secondary PCL, previously diagnosed MM transforms into the leukaemic form (10). Immunophenotyping of both MM and PCL expresses the two common plasma cell markers CD38 and CD138 along with clonal kappa or lambda light chain.

The prognosis of PCL is worse than that of high-risk MM. PCL responds poorly to conventional chemotherapy. The median overall survival is only 6 to 11 months. Treatment in PCL is a combination therapy incorporating an immunomodulatory agent, a proteasome inhibitor, steroids, and/or chemotherapy, followed by autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for eligible patients and then maintenance therapy (11). There is limited data available for PCL relapse. The incidence of relapse at three years was 61% in autologous stem cell transplantation (12).

The second case belongs to primary PCL and presents with small lymphocyte-like morphology. This morphological variant is difficult to differentiate from B-cell lymphoma. IHC showed positive expression for CD 138 and negative for CD20 and CD3. Lambda restriction was present. Garand R et al., described MM of 25/48 (52%) cases with t(11;14) had lymphoplasmacytoid morphology, and most of these cases were found to have non secretory MM (13). Similar to the literature, this case is a non secretory type. Due to the aggressive nature of PCL, as mentioned in the literature, this patient died due to refractory shock and cardiac arrest.

The third case was a primary PCL with hairy cell-like morphology. Tanioka F et al., described the origin of leukaemic cells from the immature stage compared to the more mature MM, with a good response to bortezomib-based therapy (4). The fourth case was an MM with multilobated nuclei. The third and fourth cases were difficult to diagnose as MM morphologically due to the lack of any morphological nature of plasma cells. Hairy cell leukaemia was a differential for the third case, and the fourth case had monocytic or myeloid leukaemia and non haematological neoplasm as differentials. These atypical cells showed positive expression for CD 138 with kappa restriction, while CD13 and CD20 were negative, hence the diagnosis of MM was made.

Immunofixation Electrophoresis (IFE) in the fourth case revealed IgG kappa and IgA kappa monoclonal bands. Very rarely, some cases can show “double gammopathies” (14). The occurrence of double gammopathies in the literature is 2–6% (15),(16). However, there is no prognostic significance among monoclonal gammopathy and double gammopathy (17). The fourth case had a negative tp53 mutation and was alive after combination chemotherapy for 14 months and was lost to follow-up after that.

The fifth case was an anaplastic variant of MM masquerading as high-grade lymphoma (18), dysplastic megakaryocytes (19), and metastasis. Bone marrow revealed large atypical cells resembling dysplastic megakaryocytes, which were positive for MUM 1 and negative for CD61. Anaplastic MM has a higher prevalence of 17p (p53) deletion, hence causing aggressive disease leading to the failure of therapy (20). Similar to the literature, this case had deletion 17p (p53) by FISH (Table/Fig 4)i. Since it is aggressive in nature, the patient was not responding to treatment and died.

Conclusion

Even though myeloma is a diagnosis based on a constellation of diagnostic criteria, rare presentations with unusual plasma cell morphologies can be challenging for the pathologist. Recognising these atypical plasma cell variants is important for the correct diagnosis and to avoid misdiagnosis of other malignant conditions. Some of the morphological variants, such as the anaplastic variant, are associated with a poor prognosis, which helps in predicting treatment responses. Correlation of clinical presentation, laboratory tests, and available ancillary methods is necessary for diagnosing such cases.

References

1.
Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, Blade J, Merlini G, Mateos MV, et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):e538-48. Doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70442-5.[crossref][PubMed]
2.
Hütter G, Nowak D, Blau IW, Thiel E. Auer rod-like intracytoplasmic inclusions in multiple myeloma. A case report and review of the literature. Int J Lab Hematol. 2009;31(2):236-40. Doi: 10.1111/j.1751-553X.2007.01023.x. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Heerema-McKenney A, Waldron J, Hughes S, Zhan F, Sawyer J, Barlogie B, et al. Clinical, immunophenotypic, and genetic characterization of small lymphocyte-like plasma cell myeloma: A potential mimic of mature B-cell lymphoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;133(2):265-70. Doi: 10.1309/AJCPUS3PRRT5ZXVS. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Tanioka F, Tamashima S, Shimizu S, Kobayashi H, Kobayashi Y, Sugimura H. A case of primary plasma cell leukaemia with hairy-cell morphology and lambda-type Bence-Jones protein. Immunohistochemical and molecular analysis. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2003;33(5):232-37. Doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyg043. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Harankhedkar S, Gupta R, Rahman K. Pleomorphic multinucleated plasma cells simulating megakaryocytes in an anaplastic variant of myeloma. Anaplastik Variant Myelomda Megakaryositi Taklit Eden Pleomorfik Multinükleer Plazma Hücreleri. Turk J Haematol. 2018;35(2):150-51. Doi: 10.4274/tjh.2017.0329. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Yeh YA, Pappas AA, Flick JT, Butch AW. A case of aggressive multiple myeloma with cleaved, multilobated, and monocytoid nuclei, and no serum monoclonal gammopathy. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2000;30(3):283-88.
7.
Lebeau A, Zeindl-Eberhart E, Müller EC, Müller-Höcker J, Jungblut PR, Emmerich B, et al. Generalized crystal-storing histiocytosis associated with monoclonal gammopathy: Molecular analysis of a disorder with rapid clinical course and review of the literature. Blood. 2002;100(5):1817-27. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Gupta R, Hussain N, Rahman K, Nityanand S. Plasma cell myeloma with unusual morphology--A series of 6 cases. Eur J Haematol. 2014;93(2):165-70. Doi: 10.1111/ejh.12310. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Srikanth M, Davies FE, Wu P, Jenner MW, Ethell ME, Potter MN, et al. Survival and outcome of blastoid variant myeloma following treatment with the novel thalidomide containing regime DT-PACE. Eur J Haematol. 2008;81(6):432-36. Doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2008. 01131.x. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Fernández de Larrea C, Kyle R, Rosiñol L, Paiva B, Engelhardt M, Usmani S, et al. Primary plasma cell leukaemia: Consensus definition by the International Myeloma Working Group according to peripheral blood plasma cell percentage. Blood Cancer J. 2021;11(12):192. Doi:10.1038/s41408-021-00587-0. Published 2021 Dec 2. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Tuazon SA, Holmberg LA, Nadeem O, Richardson PG. A clinical perspective on plasma cell leukaemia; Current status and future directions. Blood Cancer J. 2021;11(2):23. Doi: 10.1038/s41408-021-00414-6. Published 2021 Feb 4. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Mahindra A, Kalaycio ME, Vela-Ojeda J, Vesole DH, Zhang MJ, Li P, et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation for primary plasma cell leukaemia: Results from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Leukaemia. 2012;26(5):1091-97. Doi: 10.1038/leu.2011.312. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Garand R, Avet-Loiseau H, Accard F, Moreau P, Harousseau JL, Bataille R. t(11;14) and t(4;14) translocations correlated with mature lymphoplasmacytoid and immature morphology, respectively, in multiple myeloma. Leukaemia. 2003;17(10):2032-35. Doi: 10.1038/sj.leu. 2403091. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Srinivasan VK, Bhagat P, Bansal F, Chhabra S. Occurrence of double monoclonal bands on protein electrophoresis: An unusual finding. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2016;32(Suppl 1):184-88. Doi: 10.1007/s12288-015-0622-2. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Riddell S, Traczyk Z, Paraskevas F, Israels LG. The double gammopathies. Clinical and immunological studies. Medicine (Baltimore). 1986;65(3):135-42. Doi: 10.1097/00005792-198605000-00001. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Garcia-Garcia P, Enciso-Alvarez K, Diaz-Espada F, Vargas-Nuñez JA, Moraru M, Yebra-Bango M, et al. Biclonal gammopathies: Retrospective study of 47 patients. Rev Clin Esp. 2015;215:18-24. Doi: 10.1016/j.rce.2014.07.003. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Kyle RA, Robinson RA, Katzmann JA. The clinical aspects of biclonal gammopathies. Review of 57 cases. Am J Med. 1981;71(6):999-1008. Doi:10.1016/0002-9343(81)90326-0. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Harmon CM, Smith LB. Plasmablastic lymphoma: A review of clinicopathologic features and differential diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016;140(10):1074-78. Doi:10.5858/arpa.2016-0232-RA. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Xie W, Tang G, Li S, Yin CC, Xu J. Anaplastic multiple myeloma resembling dysplastic megakaryocytes. Clin Case Rep. 2019;8(3):568-69. Published 2019 Sep 30. Doi: 10.1002/ccr3.2425. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Sethi S, Miller I. Plasma cell myeloma with anaplastic transformation. Blood. 2016;128(16):2106. Doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-08-731844.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/67679.18959

Date of Submission: Sep 26, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Nov 07, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Dec 30, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 26, 2023
• Manual Googling: Dec 22, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Dec 27, 2023 (5%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com