Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 251404

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2024 | Month : April | Volume : 18 | Issue : 4 | Page : PD06 - PD08 Full Version

Gracilis Flap Restoring Quality of Life in a Patient with Non Functional Anal Sphincter


Published: April 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/68664.19240
Simran Dhole, Firoz Borle, Suhas Jajoo, Chandrashekhar Mahakalkar, Shivani Kshirsagar

1. Junior Resident, Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 3. Professor, Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 4. Professor, Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 5. Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Simran Dhole,
Junior Resident, Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha-442001, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: simran1997dhole@gmail.com

Abstract

An excellent technique for reconstructing the perineum following extensive perineal resection for restoration of a traumatised anal sphincter is the Gracilis myocutaneous flap. Direct anal trauma or pelvic injuries can separate the anal sphincters. An overlapping sphincteroplasty has a fair possibility of regaining acceptable fecal continence if roughly half of the sphincter ring is still functional. A case of a 22-year-old male who underwent Gracilis myocutaneous flap reconstruction after being diagnosed with a non functioning anal sphincter is reported. A free muscle transplant was done to repair the sphincter, utilising denervated muscle with an intact blood supply. New muscle was attached to those sphincter muscles which were still functional. The transplanted muscle receives new muscular fibers, enabling the repaired sphincter to contract voluntarily in addition to reflexively. The surgical approach is determined based on the presented sphincter defect. Free muscle transplantation can be preferred in cases where the external sphincter has some degree of functionality.

Keywords

Anal continence, Colorectal repair, Myocutaneous flap, Sigmoidoscopy, Sphincteroplasty, Sphincter defect

Case Report

A 22-year-old male patient with no major medical history underwent surgery following a road traffic accident caused by a collision. He had emergency repair of a main perineal tear with diversion colostomy at a private tertiary care centre (Table/Fig 1). Postoperative anorectal manometry indicated low rectal sensation, low resting pressure, and an abnormally long squeeze. The right testis was found in the medial portion of the upper thigh after an inguinoscrotal ultrasound revealed the right scrotal sac was empty. The patient was referred to another tertiary care centre for further evaluation. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was conducted to assess the extent of sphincter damage, revealing a Type 3B complex trans-sphincteric left perianal fistula.

Medical examination showed a decrease in the size of the left levator ani and left transverse perineal muscles. Sigmoidoscopy was performed to visualise the colon, which was found to be normal, and the left gracilis myocutaneous flap was scheduled. A line was drawn from the gracilis origin to the medial femoral condyle along the abductor longus, as the medial aspect of the thigh was the location of the incision, which was made 1 cm below this line; the vascular pedicle was found around the muscular belly. The pubic tubercle was 10 cm away from the pedicle. Following the dissection, a resulting flap was tunneled under the skin to the perineal defect. The repair was carried out by attaching separate sutures to the ischial tuberosity. Both intraoperative and postoperative procedures were uneventful. The preoperative condition is depicted in images (Table/Fig 2).

Intraoperative images of dissected gracilis muscle and gracilis myocutaneous flap repair have been shown (Table/Fig 3). The patient was followed up after two months of the Gracilis flap repair. Positive changes were noted, as indicated by the differences in pre- and postrepair manometry reports. The patient was better able to control his anal reflexes and was continent (Table/Fig 4),(Table/Fig 5). Postoperative Gracilis flap repair, anal manometry was suggestive of adequate anal squeeze pressure, lower increment in rectal pressure with a lower decrease in anal pressure during the push, with a normal report for anal continence on dye study (Table/Fig 6). The patient underwent colostomy closure, which had positive outcomes. The patient had normal passage of stools from his anal opening with adequate anal continence.

Discussion

Fecal incontinence is a common morbidity experienced by perineal and anorectal trauma victims (1). The sphincter can be reinforced by using translated adjacent muscles or employing an artificial sphincter if the degree of sphincter disruption or weakening prevents restoration of function through direct means (2),(3).

Though there are certain complications and morbidities associated with gracilis free flap- such as wound healing, flap loss, skin necrosis, flap wound edge separations, infections at the recipient site, thrombus in the flap and rare cases, temporary sciatic nerve palsy, but no such complication was noted in present case and the patient returned to his normal life. The gracilis muscle is a small adductor of the lower limb that inserts on the medial tibial condyle and originates in the pubic bone. It is vascularised by the medial circumflex branch of the deep femoral artery. While the lower limb typically becomes functionally disabled due to the flap’s transposition, insertion of a vascular pedicle can significantly reduce the degree of flap rotation. The gracilis muscle, a small adductor of the lower limb, is a suitable reconstructive technique for medium-sized lesions resulting from anal-rectal, vaginal, or vulvar resection, such as the gluteal and gracilis flap (4),(5). Similar to Ruiz and Kaiser, present study also utilised the puborectalis sling to contribute to anal resting tone, with the gracilis muscle augmenting the external anal sphincter (6).

Harvesting the myocutaneous flap paddle may cause a minor functional deficit in the gracilis muscle, the thigh’s most superficial adductor. It is recommended to dissect the branches of the medial circumflex femoral artery to ensure proper vascularisation of the flap. The transplanted muscle can adapt to its new function due to altered innervation. The gracilis flap can be harvested as a muscle, musculocutaneous complex, or conjoint flap, depending on the required components (7),(8). In the current case, the incision was made on the medial aspect of the thigh, 1 cm below this line, revealing a vascular pedicle around the muscular belly, contrary to the method used by Walega et al., following a single large mid-thigh incision and dissection, the resulting flap was tunneled under the skin to a perineal defect, with separate sutures attached to the ischial tuberosity for repair, unlike in this case (9).

The gracilis flap has been considered a secure and reasonably effective option for the treatment of recurrent rectovaginal fistulas, especially as a second or third-line therapeutic approach (10),(11). Despite specific scenarios for the use of the gracilis flap, the limited reliability of the distal skin component of the gracilis musculocutaneous flap has hindered its efficacy (12).

Although complications and morbidities are associated with the gracilis free flap, such as wound healing issues, flap loss, skin necrosis, infections at the recipient site, and rare cases of temporary sciatic nerve palsy, no such complications were noted in present case, and the patient returned to normal life. The cost involved can be a constraint in this procedure, attributed to the aforementioned morbidities. Other options, such as intrasphincteric injectable drugs, are under development with promising initial outcomes (13). There have been instances of flap failure in a few cases due to primary or secondary thrombosis. Further research is needed on gracilis myocutaneous flaps to assess their efficacy and gain a more comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness of this particular flap and potential strategies to mitigate complications (14).

Conclusion

The gracilis myocutaneous flap can be considered an efficient and practical technique for sphincter reconstruction. After dissection, the myocutaneous flap can be tunneled subcutaneously or across the adductor muscles to reach the perineal defect and effectively cover the wound. This can be followed by colostomy closure. In this case, the patient underwent gracilis myocutaneous flap repair to improve anal sphincter functionality, resulting in normal stool passage and improved quality of life. Therefore, perineal tear repair using a gracilis flap for positive outcomes in patients with anal continence and sphincter tone control is recommended.

References

1.
Rani KP, Kumar JS, Singaravelu V, Deyonna F. Gracilis myocutaneous flap: Adding to the armamentarium of complex sacrococcygeal defect reconstruction. Indian J Plast Surg. 2019;52(02):246-49. Doi: 10.1055/s- 0039-1696078. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Ryan JA, Beebe HG, Gibbons RP. Gracilis muscle flap for closure of rectourethral fistula. J Urol. 1979;122(1):124-25. Doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)56282-5. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Hassan MZ, Rathnayaka MM, Deen KI. Modified dynamic gracilis neosphincter for fecal incontinence: An analysis of functional outcome at a single institution. World J Surg 2010;34:1641-47. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0489-1. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Evans GR, Evans MR. Gracilis Flap for perineal reconstruction and functional restoration for the treatment of fecal incontinence. gregory Evans (ed.), operative plastic surgery, 2 edn (New York, 2019; online edn, Oxford Academic, 1 July 2019), Doi: 10.1093/med/9780190499075.003.0083, accessed 17 Nov 2023. [crossref]
5.
Thiele JR, Weber J, Neeff HP, Manegold P, Fichtner-Feigl S, Stark GB, et al. Reconstruction of perineal defects: A comparison of the myocutaneous gracilis and the gluteal fold flap in interdisciplinary anorectal tumor resection. Front Oncol. 2020;10:668. Doi: 10:668. 10.3389/fonc.2020.00668. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Ruiz NS, Kaiser AM. Fecal incontinence-Challenges and solutions. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(1):11-24. Doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i1.11. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Hull TL, Sapci I, Lightner AL. Gracilis flap repair for reoperative rectovaginal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum. 2022;113-17. Doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002249. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Barišic' G, Krivokapic' Z. Adynamic and dynamic muscle transposition techniques for anal incontinence. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2014;2(2):98-105. Doi: 10.1093/ gastro/gou014. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Walega P, Romaniszyn M, Siarkiewicz B, Zelazny D. Dynamic versus adynamic graciloplasty in treatment of end-stage fecal incontinence: Is the implantation of the pacemaker really necessary? 12-month follow-up in a clinical, physiological, and functional study. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015;698516. Doi: 10.1155/2015/698516. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Maspero M, Piñeiro AO, Steele SR, Hull TL. Gracilis muscle interposition for the treatment of rectovaginal fistula: A systematic review and pooled analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2023;66(5):631-45. Doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002739. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Park SO, Hong KY, Park KJ, Chang H, Shin JY, Jeong SY. Treatment of rectovaginal fistula with gracilis muscle flap transposition: Long-term follow-up. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017;32:1029-32. Doi: 10.1007/s00384-017- 2784-x. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Core GB, Weimar R, Meland NB. The turbo gracilis myocutaneous flap. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1992;8(04):267-75. Doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1006707. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Meurette G, Duchalais E, Lehur PA. Surgical approaches to fecal incontinence in the adult. J Visc Surg. 2014;151(1):29-39. Doi: 10.1016/j. jviscsurg.2013.12.011. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Patel AA, Moshrefi S, Cai LZ, Lee GK, Nazerali RS. A 20-year tertiary cancer center’s experience utilizing the pedicled gracilis myocutaneous flap. Eur J Plast Surg. 2020;43(1):1-6. Doi: 10.1007/s00238-020-01692-2.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/68664.19240

Date of Submission: Nov 19, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jan 04, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Jan 31, 2024
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 20, 2023
• Manual Googling: Jan 12, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Jan 26, 2024 (6%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com