Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 30788

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : April | Volume : 18 | Issue : 4 | Page : EC19 - EC23 Full Version

Spectrum of Cutaneous Metastasis in Visceral and Haematolymphoid Malignancies: A Cross-sectional Study at a Tertiary Care Centre in Kolkata, West Bengal, India


Published: April 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/66974.19330
Kanwaljeet Singh, Devika Gupta, Ankita Kumari, Prasanta Sengupta, Mohul Chandra Prakash

1. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Command Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 2. Professor, Department of Pathology, Command Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 3. Resident, Department of Pathology, Command Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 4. Professor, Department of Pathology, Command Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 5. Resident, Department of Pathology, Command Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Devika Gupta ,
Professor, Department of Pathology, Command Hospital, Alipore, Kolkata-700027, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: devikalives5h@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Cutaneous Metastasis (CM) is the spread of malignant cells from a primary site of malignancy to the skin. The incidence of CM ranges from 0.5% to 9% of all patients with cancer. CM may be the first sign of clinically silent visceral cancer or can even be a clue to tumour recurrence and heralds a poor prognosis requiring intense chemoradiotherapy.

Aim: To study the spectrum of CM of internal malignancies, including haematolymphoid neoplasms.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Department of Pathology, Command Hospital Kolkata, West Bengal, India, over a period of two years from April 2020 to March 2022 and data was analysed over the next six months. A total of 16 patients who developed CM secondary to underlying solid organ or haematological malignancy were analysed. Categorical variables were summarised as percentages. Data in tables were presented as the frequency of variables (categories) or as absolute numbers.

Results: The parameters studied included the primary site of malignancies, the frequency of various histological types at the primary site, and the common cutaneous metastatic regions. The mean patient age was 55.25 years (ranges 24-72 years) with no gender predilection (M:F=1:1). The most common primary cancer site was the kidney and the oral cavity 4 each (25%), followed by breast, lung, and haematolymphoid malignancy, 2 each (12.5%), and 1 each of thyroid and gallbladder (6.25%). The most common site of CM was the head, abdomen, and epigastric wall 07/16 each (43.75%). The majority of the CM were identified as adenocarcinoma on histopathology.

Conclusion: The CM occurs rarely and can be the initial presentation of an occult internal malignancy or may suggest recurrence if diagnosed later. Renal cell carcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity are the tumours that have a high predisposition for CM, and hence these patients require close follow-up and surveillance.

Keywords

Adenocarcinoma, Internal malignancy, Primary site, Skin metastasis

The CM involves the spread of malignant cells from a primary tumour site to the skin. The incidence of CM is reported in the literature as 0.5%-9% and represents only 2% of all skin tumours (1),(2),(3),(4),(5). CM may be the first sign of clinically silent visceral cancer (37% in men and 6% in women) or present as tumour recurrence. Skin metastases from internal malignancies have variable clinical appearance and presentation and often masquerade as inflammatory dermatosis. This causes delay and failure in diagnosis (5). The development of CM occurs by several different pathways: haematogenous spread, lymphatic spread, direct contiguous tissue invasion, and iatrogenic implantation [6-8]. The mechanism for CM can be viewed as a sequence of steps: initial steps being vessel formation (angiogenesis), cell attachment followed by invasion (matrix degradation and cell motility) and skin homing secondary to certain chemokine-induced upregulation of dermal receptors (3),(9),(10).

Furthermore, the metastatic cascade provides three basic patterns of distribution of metastases: Mechanical tumour stasis (anatomic proximity and lymphatic drainage), site-specific (selective attachment of tumour cells to a specific organ), non selective (independent of mechanical and organ-specific factors). There are four main morphologic patterns of CM involving the dermis: nodular, infiltrative, diffuse, and intravascular (11),(12). Generally, cutaneous metastases herald a poor prognosis. The average survival time of patients with skin metastases is approximately 7.5 months (13). In the present study, Immunohistochemical (IHC) studies helped identify underlying malignancies when primary tumours were unknown. Various IHC markers used in the present study were Pan Cytokeratin (CK), CK7, CK20, CD10, Cluster Differentiation 45 (CD45), GATA3 binding protein (GATA3), Gross Cystic Disease Fluid Protein (GCDFP), Thyroid Transcription Factor (TTF1), CD3, and CD20.

By analysing the spectrum of CM of internal malignancies including haematolymphoid neoplasms, the present study aimed for a better understanding of the pathophysiology of cutaneous metastasising tumours that can be attempted, and this may lead to the opening of new horizons for clinicians to implement effective management guidelines.

Material and Methods

The present cross-sectional study evaluated the clinicopathological findings of total of 16 patients who presented with CM between April 2020 and March 2022 at the Department of Pathology, Command Hospital Kolkata, West Bengal, India. Detailed history and relevant clinical examinations were carried out in all cases.

Inclusion criteria: All patients (all age groups, both genders) with CM of any site, of any primary known or occult malignancy (skin, visceral malignancy, haematolymphoid neoplasms) were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion of cases of primary cutaneous malignancies like malignant melanoma and cases of direct cutaneous involvement from the primary site or tumours arising in a previous scarred or surgical site was done.

Study Procedure

The CM was confirmed by Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) or histopathology. There were cases that presented with CM initially and FNAC, along with clinical and imaging correlation, helped ascertain the primary tumour site. In other cases with CM in a known primary site tumour, the recurrence was suggestive and necessitated the use of aggressive therapy. The primary site of the tumour, site of CM, and cytology or histopathology of the CM site tumour were noted. In some cases, IHC was performed on either the cell block made from cytology specimens or on biopsies to locate the primary cancer site. Various IHC markers used in this study were Pan Cytokeratin (CK), CK7, CK20, CD10, CD 45 (CD45), GATA3 binding protein (GATA3), GCDFP, TTF1, CD3, and CD20.

Fine needle aspiration was performed by standard technique using a 22 G needle attached to a 10 mL disposable syringe fitted onto a Cameco syringe handle. Two to three passes were taken to obtain adequate material, and 3 to 6 slides were prepared. Both wet and air-dried smears were made from the aspirated material. Wet smears were stained with Leishman and Giemsa and Papanicolaou (PAP) stains. Trucut biopsy from the cutaneous nodules was attempted if there was any discrepancy in cytology diagnosis that required histopathological confirmation. Trucut biopsy was also attempted initially in cases with an occult primary. IHC was attempted in most cases, and Immunocytochemistry (ICC) was tried on cell blocks prepared from cytology (FNAC) specimens in a few cases. IHC was used only in cases where the primary diagnosis was not known or in cases where the FNAC done did not clearly rule out a CM from the primary lesion.

Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables were summarised as percentages. Data in tables were presented as the frequency of variables (categories) or as absolute numbers. For data pertaining to age, the range with maximum and minimum values, and median age were calculated.

Results

The demographic profile is mentioned in (Table/Fig 1). The CM emerged from diverse primary sites. Among 16, 11 patients were >50 years of age and 5 (31.25%) were ≤50 years of age. The mean age of the present study population was 55.25 years. Out of 16, 8 (50%) patients were males and 8 (50%) were females, suggestive of no gender predilection with the occurrence of CM. The most common site of CM observed in the present study was the head and neck region and epigastric region/anterior abdominal wall 07/16 each (43.75%). This was followed by CM deposits in the chest/axilla 2 cases (12.5%) (Table/Fig 2).

There were 4 cases each of renal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (25% each), 3 cases (18.75%) with cutaneous metastatic deposits of adenocarcinoma (02 lung and 01 gallbladder origin), 2 cases each of ductal carcinoma of the breast and haematolymphoid malignancies (12.50%), and one case of follicular carcinoma of the thyroid (6.25%) (Table/Fig 3).

In males, squamous cell carcinoma was the most common primary site tumour to present as CM (50%), whereas in females, it was the primary site of the breast and kidney (25% each) that metastasised more commonly to the skin.

All four oral cavity cases, three out of four kidney tumours, one each of breast, lung, and gallbladder were already diagnosed cases on treatment that developed CM later. On the other hand, both the haematolymphoid neoplasms recorded presented initially as cutaneous deposits of occult malignancies. One of these was a young woman diagnosed on FNAC of an abdominal wall mass as high-grade Non Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL), which was later confirmed on biopsy as Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), and detailed imaging {Computed Tomography (CT) of the abdomen and chest} showed generalised lymphadenopathy. (Table/Fig 4) represents cytology smears of an abdominal nodule in a case of high-grade NHL. The smears are highly cellular and show cutaneous lymphoma deposits.

The second haematological occult case was of plasma cell neoplasm presenting as a scalp nodule in an elderly male (Table/Fig 3).

The CM to the scalp in a case of carcinoma breast, which was an occult primary is represented in (Table/Fig 2). The patient underwent a mastectomy that confirmed the present initial diagnosis. Overall, the findings of scalp metastatic carcinoma breast in a young 28-year-old lady were quite intriguing.

The other scalp nodule metastasis case was of an elderly lady of 65 years. She was apparently asymptomatic except for a history of an enlarging nodule in the occipital region that developed over a period of three months. FNAC from the scalp nodule showed follicular epithelial cells arranged in follicles and clusters with colloid in the background. The differentials considered on cytomorphology were of an adnexal tumour; however, the presence of colloid favoured a tumour of follicular cell origin. Immediately, ultrasonography of the thyroid glands was done, which revealed a solitary nodule in the right lobe. She underwent total thyroidectomy that confirmed follicular carcinoma of the thyroid (Table/Fig 5)a-d.

The present cohort had one elderly female who presented with metastatic deposits of adenocarcinoma in the lower back. Later clinical work-up and imaging revealed a lung mass. Biopsy confirmed non small cell carcinoma lung, favouring adenocarcinoma.

The last of the present occult CM cases was of a 63-year-old male who presented with epigastric wall deposits of renal cell carcinoma. FNAC of the abdominal wall nodule suggested metastasis of renal cell carcinoma, which was later confirmed by nephrectomy. The most common CM deposits seen were from underlying primary visceral adenocarcinoma that included tumours of the lung, kidney, breast, gallbladder, and thyroid 10/16 (62.50%). This was followed by squamous cell carcinomas 4/16 (25%).

Another tumour known to show cutaneous involvement is renal cell carcinoma of the kidney. Three out of the four renal cell carcinomas metastasised to the abdominal wall/epigastric region, and one case metastasised to the neck. FNAC followed by biopsy confirmed the cutaneous RCC deposits (Table/Fig 6)a-d. On FNAC, the differentials considered were metastatic adenocarcinoma versus renal cell carcinoma. Since all four cases were known renal cell carcinomas, a synchronous or metachronous dual malignancy was not the present first diagnosis. All underwent trucut biopsy that confirmed renal cell carcinoma deposits. IHC was done, which showed the tumour cells to be positive for CD10 and negative for CK7 and CK20.

Discussion

Cutaneous metastasis (CM) refers to the infiltration of cancer cells in the skin and subcutis, originating usually from internal known visceral malignancy. It is an uncommon occurrence and if seen, suggests disease progression (14),(15). Metastasis to the skin occurs in advanced stages of internal malignancy. It is commonly due to lymphatic or haematogenous embolisation, contiguous spread, or rarely by iatrogenic implantation of malignant cells following surgical procedures. CM can be divided into three different groups (16). The first and largest group represents cutaneous metastases originating from primary cutaneous malignant tumours, such as primary skin malignant melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, Merkel cell, and adnexal carcinomas. The second group comprises metastatic involvement from internal malignancies (17),(18),(19). The last group is manifestations of systemic haematolymphoid neoplasms (leukaemia and lymphomas) in the skin. Since, skin metastases reflect systemic dissemination of a primary malignancy, they are associated with a poor prognosis (20).

The incidence of CM increases with age, especially after the fifth decade of life (21). In the paediatric age group, skin metastasis associated with neuroblastoma or leukaemia is common (12). In the present study, 11 patients (68.75%) were over 50 years of age, and five patients (31.25%) were 50 years of age or younger. This finding was consistent with a study conducted by Rolz-Cruz G and Kim CC (21). The mean age of patients in this cohort was 55.25 years, with an age range of 24-72 years. The youngest patient with CM was a 24-year-old female with metastasis from occult high-grade non Hodgkin lymphoma to the lower back. This finding was in line with studies conducted by Teyateeti P and Ungtrakul T, and Kwon HM et al., where the mean age and age range of cases were 55/34-72 years and 58.6/26-87 years, respectively [22,23]. The male-to-female ratio in the present study was 1:1, consistent with studies conducted by Teyateeti P and Ungtrakul T, and Betloch-Mas I et al., showing a male-to-female ratio of 0.94:1 and 1.1:1 respectively (22),(24).

The CM typically develops after the initial diagnosis of the primary internal malignancy and often appears late in the course of the disease. It may indicate a recurrence of a previously treated tumour or could be the first presentation of an unrecognised malignancy, making it a critical finding (25). When CM is the first presentation without a known primary origin, determining the primary tumour site can be a challenging task. Pathologists play a crucial role in this scenario, requiring morphology coupled with an appropriate IHC work-up to confirm the tumour’s origin. Previous literature has shown that the incidence of occult malignancies presenting as CM varies from 15% to 30.3%, as reported by Fernandez-Flores A, Teyateeti P and Ungtrakul T, Kwon HM et al., Handa U et al., (11),(22),(23),(25). These findings align with the present study, where 25% of cases had initial skin involvement, subsequently confirmed by histomorphology, IHC, and clinicoradiological correlation. The FNAC in certain cases of known primary can reliably confirm cutaneous metastases (26). It proves to be a rapid, minimally invasive technique that, when coupled with ICC, can help identify the unknown primary or confirm a known case. Authors used FNAC as a modality in certain cases, while biopsy took precedence in others, especially those with a silent primary.

According to studies conducted by Fernandez-Flores A on 78 biopsies from 69 patients, the abdominal wall was the most common site for CM, followed by the head and neck region (11). In the present study, it was found that both the head and neck region and the abdominal wall were equally involved by CM. Nibhoria S et al., in their five-year study, reported nine cases out of a total of 1924 patients with internal malignancies presenting with cutaneous metastases, indicating a prevalence rate of approximately 0.5%. They reported the chest followed by the abdomen as the most frequent sites of metastasis (27).

The regional distribution of cutaneous metastases usually depends on the location of the primary disease and the mechanism of spread, which can occur through direct spread from adjacent non cutaneous structures, lymphatic or haematogenous spread, and infrequently through implantation following a surgical or diagnostic procedure (27). Carcinomas of the kidney and lung tend to invade veins and often present as metastases at skin sites distant from the primary tumour. In the present study, out of four cases of renal cell carcinoma, one case metastasised to the neck and the remaining three to the abdominal wall. Of the two cases of lung carcinoma, one metastasised to the back and the other to the anterior abdominal wall. Two cases of breast carcinoma presented as a scalp nodule and a chest wall skin lesion. Out of four cases of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, three showed cutaneous metastases to the neck, while one had deposits in the axilla. Scalp metastases in females should raise suspicion of possible breast cancer, and in males, of lung malignancy (28). One of the breast carcinoma cases had cutaneous metastasis in the scalp. However, cases of lung malignancies in the present study did not show scalp metastasis.

In the present study, the most common primary site malignancies were kidney and oral cavity (25%). Common primary tumour sites differed between female and male patients. Among females, the most common primary site malignancies were breast and kidney, each amounting to 25% of cases. Among males, it was observed that oral cavity (50%), followed by kidney (25%), were the common primary malignancy sites. Studies conducted by Handa U et al., Kwon HM et al., and Fernandez-Flores A suggested that the most common site of primary malignancy was breast in women and lung in males (11),(23),(25). Handa U et al., studied 138 cases retrospectively diagnosed with cutaneous and subcutaneous metastases on FNAC. Out of 101 cases with known primaries, Handa U et al., found that the most common cancer to metastasise to the skin was breast carcinoma (23 cases) in females, and in males, 12 cases of lung cancer metastasis were seen. Variations seen in the male cohort can be explained by multifactorial causes, with ethnic and geographical differences being the most probable. The histology of the most common primary malignancy was adenocarcinoma, followed by squamous cell carcinoma in the present cohort. The predominant histomorphology of adenocarcinoma is in concordance with study conducted by Handa U et al., who described 26 out of 138 cases as metastases of adenocarcinoma (25).

Limitation(s)

The major limitation in the present study was the small sample size and the heterogeneous cases reported, including two haematolymphoid neoplasms, which are known to have circulating malignant cells. Additionally, most patients who present with skin nodules first report to the Dermatology outpatient department. Being a cross-sectional study, the authors were unable to gather data on the initial dermatological description of the metastatic deposits.

Conclusion

The CM can have variable clinical appearances and mimic many benign skin lesions. Skin manifestations before the primary tumour can make it difficult to determine the occult site based on morphology alone. However, the use of appropriate IHC markers along with clinicoradiological correlation can help confirm the diagnosis early, leading to timely therapeutic intervention. Large-scale prospective studies with follow-up details will help establish the outcomes of internal malignancies with CM. The present study has a small cohort of diverse cases that provide insight into the spectrum of associated CM and increase awareness among physicians and oncologists so that in the future, better treatment modalities can be established.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank and acknowledge all technicians working in the histopathology and immunohistochemistry section of Command Hospital, Kolkata laboratory for providing technical assistance.

References

1.
Lookingbill DP, Spangler N, Sexton FM. Skin involvement as the presenting sign of internal carcinoma. A retrospective study of 7316 cancer patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990;22:19-26. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Krathen RA, Orengo IF, Rosen T. Cutaneous metastasis: A meta-analysis of data. South Med J. 2003;96(2):164-67. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Schwartz RA. Cutaneous metastatic disease. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;33(2 Pt 1):161-85. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Lookingbill DP, Spangler N, Helm KF. Cutaneous metastases in patients with metastatic carcinoma: A retrospective study of 4020 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993;29(2 Pt 1):228-36. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Nashan D, Meiss F, Braun-Falco M, Sebastian Reichenberger. Cutaneous metastases from internal malignancies. Dermatol Ther. 2010;23(6):567-80. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Hu SC, Chen GS, Wu CS, Chi CY, Chen WT, E Lan CC. Rates of cutaneous metastases from different internal malignancies: Experience from a Taiwanese medical center. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;60(3):379-87. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Rosen T. Cutaneous metastases. Med Clin North Am. 1980;64(5):885-900. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
White JW Jr. Evaluating cancer metastatic to the skin. Geriatrics. 1985;40(8):67-73.
9.
Hussein MR. Skin metastases: A pathologist’s perspective. J Cutan Pathol. 2010;37(9):e1-e20. [crossref]
10.
Habermehl G, Ko J. Cutaneous metastases: A review and diagnostic approach to tumours of unknown origin. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019;143(8):943-57.[crossref][PubMed]
11.
Fernandez-Flores A. Cutaneous metastases: A study of 78 biopsies from 69 patients. Am J Dermatopathol. 2010;32(3):222-39. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Komurcugil I, Arslan Z, Bal Z, Aydogan M, Ciman Y. Cutaneous metastases different clinical presentations: Case series and review of the literature. Dermatol Reports. 2023;15(1):9553. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Saeed S, Keehn CA, Morgan MB. Cutaneous metastases: A clinical, pathological and immunohistochemical appraisal. J Cutan Pathol. 1994;31(6):419-30. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
El Khoury J, Khalifeh I, Kibbi AG, Abbas O. Cutaneous metastasis: Clinicopathological study of 72 patients from a tertiary care center in Lebanon. Int J Dermatol. 2014;53(2):147-58. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Sariya D, Ruth K, Adams-McDonnell R, Cusack C, Xu X, Elenitsas R, et al. Clinicopathologic correlation of cutaneous metastases: Experience from a cancer center. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143(5):613-20. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Alcaraz I, Cerroni L, Rütten A, Kutzner H, Requena L. Cutaneous metastases from internal malignancies: A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical review. Am J Dermatopathol. 2012;34(4):347-93. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Chiu CS, Lin CY, Kuo TT, Kuan YZ, Chen MG, Ho HS, et al. Malignant cutaneous tumours of the scalp: A study of demographic characteristics and histologic distributions of 398 Taiwanese patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;56(3):448-52. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Mok ZR, Yong AM, Leung AJ, Tan KB, Aw DC. Cutaneous metastasis: Experience from a tertiary healthcare institution in Singapore. Int J Dermatol. 2017;56(12):1497-98. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Sittart JADS, Senise M. Cutaneous metastasis from internal carcinomas: A review of 45 years. An Bras Dermatol. 2013;88(4):541-44. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Saeed S, Keehn CA, Morgan MB. Cutaneous metastasis: A clinical, pathological, and immunohistochemical appraisal. J Cutan Pathol. 2004;31(6):419-30. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Rolz-Cruz G, Kim CC. Tumour invasion of the skin. Dermatol Clin. 2008;26(1):89- 102. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Teyateeti P, Ungtrakul T. Retrospective review of cutaneous metastasis among 11,418 patients with solid malignancy: A tertiary cancer center experience. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(29):e26737. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Kwon HM, Kim GY, Shin DH, Bae YK. Clinicopathologic features of cutaneous metastases from internal malignancies. J Pathol Transl Med. 2021;55(4):289-97. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Betlloch-Mas I, Soriano-García T, Boira I, Palazon JC, Juan-Carpena G, Sancho- Chust JN, et al. Cutaneous metastases of solid tumours: Demographic, clinical, and survival characteristics. Cureus. 2021;13(11):e19970. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Handa U, Kundu R, Dimri K. Cutaneous metastasis: A study of 138 cases diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration cytology. Acta Cytol. 2017;61(1):47-54. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Karde S, Sharma J, Ramesh N, Bhand P, Shukla A. Cutaneous metastases as initial presentation of malignancy. BJR. 2018;4(1):20170059. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Nibhoria S, Tiwana KK, Kaur M, Kumar S. A clinicopathological and immunohistochemical correlation in cutaneous metastases from internal malignancies: A five-year study. J Skin Cancer. 2014;2014:793937. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Habif TP, Campbell JL, Shane Chapman M, Dinulos JGH, Zug KA. Premalignant and malignant non-melanoma skin tumours. Skin Disease. 2004;17:464-507.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/66974.19330

Date of Submission: Aug 10, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Oct 18, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jan 21, 2024
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 11, 2023
• Manual Googling: Dec 15, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jan 19, 2024 (11%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com