Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 96522

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : April | Volume : 18 | Issue : 4 | Page : EC01 - EC06 Full Version

Flow Cytometry in Mature T- and NK-cell Neoplasms: A Retrospective Descriptive Study from a Tertiary Care Cancer Centre in Kerala, India


Published: April 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/67657.19283
Jayasudha Arundhathi Vasudevan, Rekha A Nair, Priya Mary Jacob, CM Simi, Geetha Narayanan, Aleyamma Mathew

1. Associate Professor, Division of Pathology, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. 2. Professor, Department of Pathology, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. 5. Professor and Head, Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. 6. Professor and Head, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Jayasudha Arundhathi Vasudevan,
Associate Professor, Division of Pathology, Regional Cancer Centre, Medical College, P.O. Thiruvananthapuram-695011, Kerala, India.
E-mail: drjayasiv@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Mature T- and NK-cell Neoplasms (MTNKN) constitute around 12% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas. They have a variable clinical course, ranging from indolent to highly aggressive tumours. Flow cytometry immunophenotyping is crucial for the diagnosis, staging, and classification of MTNKN.

Aim: To determine the frequency, morphologic, and immunophenotypic profile of various subtypes of MTNKN diagnosed by flow cytometry.

Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective descriptive study conducted at the Department of Pathology, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. All cases of MTNKN diagnosed by flow cytometry in peripheral blood, bone marrow aspirates, or body fluids from January 1, 2010 to June 30, 2020 (10.5 years duration) at the cancer centre were studied. The morphology of tumour cells and immunophenotype by flow cytometry were analysed. Clinical parameters (lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, skin lesions, effusions, B symptoms) and follow-up details, including Progression-free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS), were also noted. Descriptive statistics for continuous variables and frequencies and percentages for categorical variables were obtained. The Kaplan-Meier method for survival plots was used.

Results: Mature T- and NK-cell neoplasms constituted 83 cases. The median age of patients was 56 years. The majority of patients were males (n=49). Adult T-cell Leukaemia/Lymphoma (ATLL) (n=50) constituted the most common subtype, followed by Mycosis Fungoides/Sezary Syndrome (MF/SS) (n=14), T-cell Large Granular Lymphocytic Leukaemia (T-LGLL) (n=7), T-cell Prolymphocytic Leukaemia (T-PLL) (n=4), Aggressive NK-cell Leukaemia (ANKL) (n=3), Hepatosplenic T-cell Lymphoma (HSTL) (n=3), and Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (ALCL) (n=2). OS and PFS at three years were 22.3% and 16.6%, respectively.

Conclusion: Mature T- and NK-cell neoplasms presenting as leukaemia is rare. ATLL was the most common subtype of MTNKN. Flower cells, Sezary cells, and prolymphocytes are useful morphological clues for diagnosis. Immunophenotyping by flow cytometry, along with clinicopathologic correlation, is crucial for the diagnosis and subclassification of MTNKN. All subtypes except T-LGLL show inferior PFS and OS.

Keywords

Chronic lymphoproliferative disorder, Frequency, Immunophenotype, Subtypes, Survival

The MTNKN are less common than mature B-cell neoplasms, constituting only around 12% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas (1). There is a higher incidence in Asia, particularly in HTLV-1 endemic regions (2),(3). The primary approach to the flow cytometry diagnosis in MTNKN depends on the demonstration of deviation from the normal immunophenotypic antigen pattern (4),(5),(6). Familiarity with the normal antigen expression pattern in normal and reactive conditions is important, as the reactive T-cell population may also show downregulation of the expression of T-cell antigens. Downregulation of CD5 and CD7 is also reported in reactive T-cell populations. Some mature T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders present primarily in the leukaemic phase, while some present primarily as lymphomas, thus explaining the importance of clinical correlation. MTNKN presenting in the leukaemic phase are ATLL, MF/SS, T-LGLL, T-PLL, HSTL, ANKL, and NK-large granular lymphocytic leukaemia (7). ATLL is associated with the human retrovirus HTLV-1 and most frequently presents in an acute phase with circulating tumour cells and is morphologically characterised by flower cells. Sezary syndrome is a triad of erythroderma, generalised lymphadenopathy, and the presence of clonally related neoplastic T cells (Sezary cells) in the skin, lymph nodes, and peripheral blood (1),(2). Sezary syndrome and mycosis fungoides are closely related tumours but are considered separate based on the clinical picture. T-PLL classically presents with a markedly high and rapidly rising WBC count and is associated with skin changes, lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, and effusions. T-LGLL is characterised by a persistent increase in Large Granular Lymphocytes (LGLs) usually to 2-20×109/L without a clearly identified cause (1). ANKL is characterised by systemic proliferation of NK cells associated with an aggressive clinical course (1). The HSTL is an aggressive extranodal lymphoma characterised by hepatosplenomegaly without lymphadenopathy (1),(2),(3). The present study aimed mainly to determine the frequency of various subtypes of MTNKN diagnosed by flow cytometry, assess the morphologic and immunophenotypic profile, PFS, and OS of these subtypes. Flow cytometry helps in providing a rapid diagnosis in MTNKN, which are generally aggressive. This helps in the early initiation of treatment and thus a better clinical outcome. The present study is the single largest study on MTNKN diagnosed by flow cytometry from Kerala, India.

Material and Methods

This was a retrospective descriptive study that included all cases of MTNKN diagnosed by flow cytometry from 1 January 2010 to 30 June 2020 (a duration of 10.5 years) at Department of Pathology, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India, a tertiary care cancer centre in India. The study period was from 1 August 2020 to 31 July 2021. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB No: 09/2020/05).

Inclusion criteria: All new cases of MTNKN diagnosed by flow cytometry in peripheral blood, bone marrow aspirates, or body fluids were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Relapsed cases of MTNKN were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

The total number of flow cytometry tests done in the tertiary care cancer centre for the diagnosis of haematologic malignancies during this period was 7574. Mature lymphoid neoplasms in the leukaemic phase, including B-cell and T/NK-cell lineage, accounted for 778 cases. The frequency of MTNKN was calculated based on the total number of mature lymphoid neoplasms of both B- and T- and NK-cell lineage diagnosed by flow cytometry during the period. Samples for flow cytometry included peripheral blood, bone marrow aspirates, or body fluids. The morphology of tumour cells in peripheral blood or bone marrow, including the presence/absence of flower cells, Sezary cells, prolymphocytes, LGLs, was noted. Immunophenotype by flow cytometry was determined using a six-colour flow cytometry analysis with a BD FACS Verse flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA). The standard lyse-wash method was used, and a minimum of 10,000 events were acquired for analysis. LCA gating was used to identify the atypical cell population. An antibody panel consisting of CD2FITC (55.2), CD3PerCP (SK7), CD5PE (L17F12), CD7APC (M-T701), CD4 PECy7 (SK3), CD8FITC (SK1), CD25PerCP (M-A251), CD20APC (L-27), CD34PE (8G-12), CD56PE (MY31), CD16PE (873.1), TCRabFITC (WT31), TCR gdPE (11F2), CD1aAPC (H1149), TdtFITC (E17-1519), and CD45FITC (2D1) was used. Data analysis was done using BDFAC Suite software. Clinical parameters and follow-up details were noted. Serum HTLV-1 assay was done by western blot in all cases suspicious of ATLL. OS was assessed from the date of diagnosis to the date of death (if dead)/closure of the study. PFS was assessed from the date of the 1st treatment to the date of progression/closure of the study.

Statistical Anlaysis

Statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for Statistical Sciences (SPSS) software version 28.0 Descriptive statistics, such as the mean and standard deviation for continuous variables and frequency and percentages for categorical variables, were obtained. Statistical associations were assessed using the Chi-square test. The Kaplan-Meier method for survival plot, Log-rank test for statistical significance for survival, and Cox-regression model for risk estimation were utilised. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Frequency: The total number of MTNKN cases diagnosed during the period was 83. MTNKN accounted for 10.67% of mature lymphoid neoplasms, including B-cell and T/NK-cell lineage (n=778). Of the 83 cases, 78 were diagnosed in peripheral blood, four in bone marrow, and one in pleural fluid. ATLL constituted the most common subtype (n=50), followed by MF/SS (n=14), T-LGLL (n=7), T-PLL (n=4), ANKL (n=3), HSTL (n=3), and ALCL (n=2).

Demographic details: The age range of patients ranged from 17 to 83 years, with a median age of 56 years. The majority of patients were males (n=49). The age range of ATLL patients was 32 to 75 years, with the majority (n=33) being males. MF/SS patients were aged between 35 to 72 years, with a male predominance (n=7). T-PLL patients’ age range was 53 to 65 years, with an equal distribution between males and females. T-LGLL patients’ age ranged from 37 to 68 years. Among the three ANKL patients, two were 17 years old, one was 40 years old, and there was a male predominance (n=2). HSTL patients’ age ranged from 26 to 53 years, and all patients were females. Both ALCL patients were males, aged 44 years and 56 years, respectively.

Clinical and laboratory data: Clinical and laboratory features of the various subtypes are presented in (Table/Fig 1). Among routine haematological parameters, anaemia was present in 36% (n=36), leukocytosis in 94% (n=78), and thrombocytopenia in 35% (n=29) of patients. Analysis of biochemical parameters revealed hypercalcemia in 27% (n=22) and elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase levels in 90% (n=75) of patients. Clinical data analysis revealed lymphadenopathy in 73% (n=61), hepatomegaly in 40% (n=33), splenomegaly in 49% (n=41), effusions in 24% (n=20), and B symptoms in 46% (n=38) of patients. Effusions and B symptoms were absent in T-LGLL.

Morphology and flow cytometry data: The immunophenotype by flow cytometry of each subtype is shown in (Table/Fig 2).

Adult T- cell leukaemia/lymphoma cases (n=50) were diagnosed after correlating immunophenotype by flow cytometry with tumour cell morphology, clinical findings with emphasis on skin lesions, and laboratory findings including serum calcium and LDH levels. All cases showed flower cells in peripheral blood, with flow cytometry performed in all cases. ATLL cases are characterised by positivity for CD2, CD3, CD5 with loss of CD7, and bright expression of CD25. A CD4+CD8- phenotype was noted in 49 cases (Table/Fig 3)a-e. Aberrant immunophenotype included one case showing loss of CD5 and another case showing loss of CD5 and a CD4-CD8- (double negative) phenotype.

Mycosisfungoides/Sezary syndrome (n=14) was characterised by Sezary cells in all 14 cases, with flow cytometry was done in peripheral blood in all cases. All cases were positive for CD2, CD3, CD5, with loss of CD7. CD25 was positive in three cases, with dim expression compared to ATLL (Table/Fig 4)a-e. A CD4+CD8- phenotype was noted in 13 cases, with one case showing a CD4-CD8- (double negative) phenotype. Serum HTLV1 assay was negative in all 12 cases tested.

T-cell prolymphocytic leukaemia was diagnosed in four cases, all showing small to medium-sized neoplastic cells with basophilic cytoplasm, round to oval nucleus, and visible nucleoli. Three cases showed typical T-PLL immunophenotype with preservation of T-cell lineage antigens, while one case showed an aberrant immunophenotype with loss of CD3 and preservation of other T-cell lineage antigens, and absence of markers of immaturity
(Table/Fig 5)a-f. CD25 was positive in one case.

T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukaemia was seen in seven cases, with one patient diagnosed preceding acute myeloid leukaemia relapse. Flow cytometry was done in peripheral blood for six patients and bone marrow aspirate for one patient. All cases showed a CD8+CD4- phenotype, with three cases positive for CD56.

Aggressive NK-cell leukaemia constituted three cases, tumour cells in all cases being cytoplasmic CD3 and CD56 positive and negative for other T-cell lineage markers (Table/Fig 6)a-g. EBER testing could not be done in all three cases.

Hepatosplenic T- cell lymphoma was seen in three cases, with flow cytometry done in bone marrow aspirate for one case and peripheral blood for two cases. All cases showed loss of CD5, with one case exhibiting a TCR alpha beta phenotype (Table/Fig 7)a-g and two cases showing a gamma delta phenotype (Table/Fig 8)a-h.

Anaplastic large cell lymphoma was seen in two cases. The morphology of tumour cells resembled blasts, prompting an acute leukaemia panel to be conducted in both cases. The first case was positive for CD56 and CD7 only, while the second case was positive for CD56 only and negative for other T-lineage, NK-cell markers, B lineage, and myeloid markers. CD30 and ALK were not present in the flow cytometry panel. Lymph node biopsies were performed in both cases, revealing tumour cells strongly positive for CD30 (Table/Fig 9)a-g. ALK was positive in the first case and negative in the second case.

Serum HTL V-1 assay: Serum HTLV-1 assay was done in 24 out of 50 cases suggestive of ATLL by flow cytometry, all of which tested positive.

Survival data: The follow-up of patients at three years was 80.7%, and at four years was 78.3%, with a median follow-up period of 37 months (1-79 months). The Overall Survival (OS) at three years in patients with MTNKN presenting in the leukaemic phase was 22.3% {Standard Error (SE)=5.2%} (Table/Fig 10). Progression-free Survival (PFS) at three years was 16.6% (SE=4.6%) (Table/Fig 11). The overall Median Survival (MS) time was 3.1 months (SE=1.22%) (Table/Fig 12).

Among ATLL cases, 22 patients were treated with multi-agent chemotherapy regimens based on age and performance status. Four patients received palliative chemotherapy. PFS at three years was 7% (SE=4.6%) (Table/Fig 13),(Table/Fig 14), and OS was 11.5% (SE=5.8%) (Table/Fig 15),(Table/Fig 16). The MS was around 1.3 months (SE=0.42) (Table/Fig 12).

Four patients with MF/SS were treated with multi-agent chemotherapy regimens (CHOP/COP/LSG/MINE) based on age and performance status, while one patient received palliative chemotherapy. PFS at three years was 21.4% (SE=11%) (Table/Fig 13),(Table/Fig 14). OS at three years was around 39.7% (SE=13%) (Table/Fig 15),(Table/Fig 16). The MS was 20.8 months (SE=8.26) (Table/Fig 12).

Among T-PLL, three patients were treated with a multi-agent chemotherapy regimen (CHOP), and one patient received palliative chemotherapy. All four cases had an aggressive clinical course (Table/Fig 13),(Table/Fig 14),(Table/Fig 15),(Table/Fig 16). The Median Survival (MS) was 3.5 months (SE=1.77) (Table/Fig 12).

In T-LGLL, only two patients required treatment and were managed with a single-agent methotrexate. One of these patients had progressive disease and was then managed with single-agent cyclophosphamide. Progression-free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) at three years were both 100% (Table/Fig 13),(Table/Fig 14),(Table/Fig 15),(Table/Fig 16).

Patients with ANKL were treated with a multi-agent chemotherapy regimen but had an aggressive clinical course (Table/Fig 13),(Table/Fig 14),(Table/Fig 15),(Table/Fig 16). The median survival was 2.6 months (SE=1.68) (Table/Fig 12).

Among HSTL, two patients were treated with a multi-agent chemotherapy (CVP) regimen, and one patient did not receive treatment. All patients had a dismal outcome (Table/Fig 13).(Table/Fig 14),(Table/Fig 15),(Table/Fig 16). The median survival was 0.8 months (SE=0.33) (Table/Fig 12).

Both patients with ALCL could not begin treatment and had a poor outcome (Table/Fig 13),(Table/Fig 14),(Table/Fig 15),(Table/Fig 16). The median survival was 0.03 months (Table/Fig 12).

The difference in Overall Survival (OS) between different subtypes was found to be statistically significant (p-value=0.001) (Table/Fig 16). OS at three years for T-LGLL was 100%, while for non T-LGLL cases it was 14.8% (SE=4.7%), and this difference was statistically significant (p-value=0.001). The Progression-free Survival (PFS) for the different subtypes was also statistically significant (p-value=0.001) (Table/Fig 14). PFS at three years for T-LGLL was 100%, compared to 8.8% (SE=3.7%) for non T-LGLL cases, and this difference was statistically significant (p-value=0.001).

Discussion

The MTNKN constituted around 10.67% of mature lymphoid neoplasms diagnosed by flow cytometry. Tembhare PR et al., studied 232 cases of MTNKN diagnosed by flow cytometry out of 4862 patients who were evaluated using flow cytometry for lymphoma diagnosis and staging over a period of seven years (8). The study correlated flow cytometry results with histopathology and immunohistochemistry. The study also emphasised the role of flow cytometry in confirming bone marrow infiltration in MTNKN, especially in cases of low-level involvement. The median age of patients was 51 years, showing male predominance with a male-to-female ratio of 2.3:1. Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma was the most common subtype in the study, constituting 22.4% (n=52).

Gujral S et al., studied the morphology and immunophenotype of MTNKN for a period of four years (9). The diagnosis was based on the morphology and flow cytometric immunophenotyping of peripheral blood and/or bone marrow samples of cases of MTNKN presenting as leukaemia. MTNKN constituted nine cases, accounting for 4% of mature lymphoid neoplasms diagnosed by flow cytometry. T-LGLL (n=4) was the most frequent subtype, followed by T-PLL (n=2), ATLL (n=2), and primary cutaneous gamma-delta T-cell lymphoma (n=1).

Naseem S et al., studied the spectrum, frequency, morphology, and immunophenotype of newly diagnosed MTNKN over a period of two and a half years (10). MTNKN constituted 3.1% (n=8) of mature lymphoid neoplasms, with T-PLL (n=4) being the most frequent subtype, followed by chronic lymphoproliferative disorder of NK cells (n=2), T-LGLL (n=1), and HSTL (n=1).

Adult T- cell leukaemia/lymphoma constituted the most common subtype in the present study. The alarming incidence of ATLL in the state of Kerala, India, was also highlighted by Nair RA et al., (11). CD4/CD8 double negativity is extremely rare (12),(13). Loss of CD2, CD3, and CD5 are also reported. The present study had two cases of ATLL with atypical immunophenotype. Aberrant immunophenotypes may be associated with a more aggressive behaviour in ATLL. Another study from a referral centre in India showed a frequency of 22% (n=2) among mature T and NK-cell neoplasms presenting as leukaemia (9). The survival of the acute variant of ATLL ranges from two weeks to more than one year (1). The median survival of ATLL in the present study was 1.3 months.

Mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome constituted the second most common subtype. The typical immunophenotype of MF/SS is CD3 positive, CD4 positive T cells with aberrant loss of CD7 and CD26. CD25 was expressed in 10 cases in the present study. Compared to ATLL, all the cases showed dim expression of CD25. Bright expression of CD25 would include ATLL as an alternative diagnosis and mandates testing for serum HTLV1. Rare cases of CD4/CD8 double-negative phenotypes are also reported, which was seen in a single case in the present series (14). The Median Survival (MS) of SS is around 32 months, whereas the present study showed an MS of 20.8 months (SE=8.26). SS is an aggressive disease with a five-year OS of 10-30% depending on the stage of the disease (1). The present study also showed similar findings.

T-cell prolymphocytic leukaemia is morphologically characterised by small to medium-sized cells with non granular basophilic cytoplasm, some showing cytoplasmic protrusions or blebs, round/oval/markedly irregular nuclei, and visible nucleoli [1,15,16]. It is characterised by pan T-cell antigen expression without antigen loss. Immunophenotypic aberrancies in CD2, CD3, CD5, and CD7 are also reported. Loss of CD3 is reported in one case series (15). Loss of CD3 was seen in one case in the present study. Rare immunophenotypes like decreased surface CD3, CD45, as well as the more common CD4 and CD8 double-positive phenotype, may result in a differential diagnosis of T lymphoblastic leukaemia. However, the absence of markers of immaturity like CD1a, CD34, Tdt, along with the morphology of atypical lymphoid cells, will help in the distinction. The course of the disease is aggressive with an MS of 1-2 years (1).

T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukaemia is characterised by Large Granular Lymphocytes (LGLs) in the blood and bone marrow. T-LGLL is typically a disorder of mature cytotoxic T cells. The typical immunophenotype is CD3+, TCRab+, CD4-, CD8+. CD56-positive T-LGLL may have an aggressive clinical course associated with STAT5B mutations (17). Three cases of T-LGLL in the present study were CD56 positive, and among them, one case had disease progression.

The typical immunophenotype of ANKL is CD2+, CD3 epsilon+, surface CD3-, CD56+. EBER testing could not be performed in these cases. The median survival of ANKL is less than two months (1). Similar findings were seen in the present study as well. NK-large granular lymphocytic leukaemia is defined as a persistent increase in NK-cells without a clearly identified cause (1). It has an indolent behaviour compared to fulminant ANKL. The immunophenotype is similar to ANKL, except that CD16 is more frequently positive. There were no cases of NK-large granular lymphocytic leukaemia in the present series.

Hepatosplenic T- cell lymphoma is characterised immunophenotypically by CD3+, CD5-, usually T-cell receptor gamma delta (TCR gd)+, CD8-/+, CD4-, TIA1+ (1),(18),(19),(20). The clinicopathological features of HSTL alpha-beta subtype resemble the gamma-delta subtype, and they can be considered phenotypically heterogeneous subtypes of the same entity (18). A peculiarity of the three cases was that all the cases presented with lymphocytosis. The maximum total count in peripheral blood reported in the literature is 25.7×109/L. One of the patients in the present study had a total count of 35,900/mm3, and another patient had a total count of 1.02 lakh/mm3. The median survival of HSTL is less than two years, as seen in the present study.

Among ALCLs, the leukaemic phase occurs more commonly in ALK-positive ALCL, more often in the small cell variant, and is associated with the presence of cytogenetic abnormalities characterised by t (2;5) (21),(22). Rare ALK-negative cases are also recorded (23). These patients, regardless of ALK expression, have an unfavourable prognosis. The present study had two cases of ALCL, of which one was ALK-negative ALCL.

Limitation(s)

Molecular studies were not conducted in the present study.

Conclusion

The MTNKN accounted for around 10.67% of mature lymphoid neoplasms diagnosed by flow cytometry. ATLL constituted the most common subtype. The presence of flower cells in ATLL, Sezary cells in MF/SS, and prolymphocytes in T-PLL are helpful morphological clues for diagnosis. Morphology should be correlated with clinical, laboratory, and immunophenotypic data. Prognosis was excellent for T-LGLL, while it was inferior for other subtypes. Clinicopathologic correlation is essential for the diagnosis and subcategorisation of these groups of neoplasms.

References

1.
WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Haematolymphoid tumours [Internet; beta version ahead of print]. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2022. (WHO classification of tumours series, 5th ed.; vol. 11). Available from: https://tumourclassification.iarc.who.int/chapters/63.
2.
Satou A, Bennani NN, Feldman AL. Update on the classification of T-cell lymphomas, hodgkin lymphomas, and histiocytic/dendritic cell neoplasms. Expert Rev Hematol. 2019;12(10):833-43. Doi: 10.1080/17474086.2019.1647777. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
De Leval L. Approach to nodal-based T-cell lymphomas. Pathology. 2020;52(1):78- 99. Doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2019.09.012. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Cherian S, Wood B. Flow cytometry in evaluation of hematopoietic neoplasms: A case-based approach. College of American Pathologists, 2012.
5.
Jevremovic D, Olteanu H. Flow cytometry applications in the diagnosis of T/NK-cell Lymphoproliferative disorders. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2019;96(2):99-115. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Shi M, Jevremovic D, Otteson GE, Timm MM, Olteanu H, Horna P. Single antibody detection of T-cell receptor αβ clonality by flow cytometry rapidly identifies mature T-cell neoplasms and monotypic small CD8-positive subsets of uncertain significance. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2020;98(1):99-107. Doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21782. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Herling M, Khoury JD, Washington LT, Duvic M, Keating MJ, Jones D. A systematic approach to diagnosis of mature T-cell leukemias reveals heterogeneity among WHO categories. Blood. 2004;104(4):328-35. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Tembhare PR, Chatterjee G, Chaturvedi A, Dasgupta N, Khanka T, Verma S, et al. Critical role of flow cytometric immunophenotyping in the diagnosis, subtyping, and staging of T-cell/NK-cell Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in real-world practice: A study of 232 cases from a tertiary cancer centre in India. Front Oncol. 2022;12:779230. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Gujral S, Polampalli S, Badrinath Y, Kumar A, Subramanian PG, Nair R, et al. Immunophenotyping of mature T/NK-cell neoplasm presenting as leukaemia. Indian J Cancer. 2010;47(2):189-93. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Naseem S, Kaur M, Sachdeva MS, Ahluwalia J, Das R, Varma N, et al. T-cell/ Natural killer-cell neoplasms presenting as leukaemia-Case series from single tertiary care centre. Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res. 2016;10(1):13-20.
11.
Nair RA, Jacob PM, Nair SG, Prem S, Jayasudha AV, Sindhu NP, et al. Adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma (ATLL) in Kerala, South India: Are we staring at the tip of the iceberg? J Hematopathol. 2013;6:135-44. [crossref]
12.
Kamihira S, Sohda H, Atogami S, Fukushima T, Toriya K, Miyazaki Y, et al. Unusual morphological features of adult T-cell leukaemia cells with aberrant immunophenotype. Leuk Lymphoma. 1993;12(1-2):123-30. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Licata MJ, Janakiram M, Tan S, Fang Y, Shah UA, Verma AK, et al. Diagnostic challenges of adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma in North America-A clinical, histological, and immunophenotypic correlation with a workflow proposal. Leukaemia Lymphoma. 2018;59(5):1188-94. Doi: 10.1080/10428194.2017.1365862. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Kageyama Y, Tsuda K, Nato Y, Nagaharu K, Suzuki K, Sawaki A, et al. Sézary syndrome with CD4/CD8 double-negative neoplastic T Cells in peripheral blood. Case Rep Hematol. 2021;2021:5527725. Doi: 10.1155/2021/5527725. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Chen X, Cherian S. Immunophenotypic characterization of T-cell prolymphocytic leukaemia. Am J Clin Pathol. 2013;140(5):727-35. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Staber PB, Herling M, Bellido M, Jacobsen ED, Davids MS, Kadia TM, et al. Consensus Criteria for diagnosis, staging, and treatment response assessment of T-cell prolymphocytic leukaemia. Blood. 2019;134(14):1132-43. Doi: 10.1182/ blood.2019000402. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Lamy T, Moignet A, Loughran TP Jr. LGL leukaemia: From pathogenesis to treatment. Blood. 2017;129(9):1082-94. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Macon WR, Levy NB, Kurtin PJ, Salhany KE, Elkhalifa MY, Casey TT, et al. Hepatosplenic alphabeta T-cell lymphomas: A report of 14 cases and comparison with hepatosplenic gammadelta T-cell lymphomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25(3):285-96. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Foss FM, Horwitz SM, Civallero M, Bellei M, Marcheselli L, Kim WS, et al. Incidence and outcomes of rare T-cell lymphomas from the T-cell project: Hepatosplenic, enteropathy associated and peripheral gamma delta T-cell lymphomas. Am J Hematol. 2020;95(2):151-55. Doi: 10.1002/ajh.25674. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Pro B, Allen P, Behdad A. Hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma: A rare but challenging entity. Blood. 2020;136(18):2018-26. Doi: 10.1182/blood.2019004118. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Nguyen JT, Condron MR, Nguyen ND, De J, Medeiros LJ, Padula A. Anaplastic large cell lymphoma in leukaemic phase: Extraordinarily high white blood cell count. Pathol Int. 2009;59(5):345-53. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Nnachi OC, Ezenwenyi IP, Okoye AE, Akpa CO, Uzoigwe CJ, Ugwu GC. Diagnostic challenges of anaplastic large cell lymphoma in a resource-limited setting: A case report and literature review. Case Rep Hematol. 2021;2021:6677638. Doi: 10.1155/2021/6677638. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Lu Y, Zhao X, Wang E, Chen W, Huang Q. ALK-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma with extensive peripheral blood and bone marrow involvements manifested as “leukaemic phase”. Leuk Res. 2010;34(4):475-82.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/67657.19283

Date of Submission: Sep 22, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Dec 07, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jan 30, 2024
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? No
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 23, 2023
• Manual Googling: Dec 15, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jan 27, 2024 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com