Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 28881

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : September | Volume : 17 | Issue : 9 | Page : OC33 - OC36 Full Version

Prevalence and Aetiology of Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuretic Hormone in Hyponatraemia: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: September 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/62752.18434
SR Resmi, Anil Thomas, Ani Thampi, SK Mathew, Sunil Antony

1. Assistant Professor, Department of General Medicine, Believer’s Church Medical College, Thiruvalla, Kerala, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of General Medicine, Believer’s Church Medical College, Thiruvalla, Kerala, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of General Medicine, Believer’s Church Medical College, Thiruvalla, Kerala, India. 4. Professor, Department of General Medicine, Believer’s Church Medical College, Thiruvalla, Kerala, India. 5. Associate Professor, Department of General Medicine, Believer’s Church Medical College, Thiruvalla, Kerala, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Sunil Antony,
Associate Professor, Department of General Medicine, Believer’s Church Medical College, St. Thomas Nagar, Kuttapuzha P.O, Thiruvalla-689103, Kerala, India.
E-mail: drsunilantony@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Hyponatraemia is a frequently occurring electrolyte abnormality. Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuretic Hormone Secretion (SIADH) is one of the common causes of hyponatraemia. SIADH is a disorder of impaired water excretion caused by the inability to suppress the secretion of Antidiuretic Hormone (ADH). The importance of determining the cause of hyponatraemia as SIADH is not only to seek the aetiology of SIADH but also to treat appropriately.

Aim: To determine the prevalence of SIADH in patients with hyponatraemia and its causes in these patients.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of General Medicine at Jubilee Mission Medical College and Hospital, Thrissur, Kerala, India. The study duration was one year and six months, from December 2014 to June 2016. A total of 100 individuals over the age of 18, who were admitted with serum sodium levels under 135 mEq/L, were chosen. Data on the causes of hyponatraemia and SIADH, laboratory evaluations, and assessments based on SIADH criteria were gathered using a structured proforma. The primary outcome variables included the aetiology of SIADH and the causes of hyponatraemia. Frequency and percentages were used to represent the data. The data were analysed using MS Excel.

Results: Among 100 patients, the maximum number of patients with hyponatraemia were in the 59-78 years age group. Forty-two (42) had severe hyponatraemia (Na < 120 mmol/L). The most common cause of hyponatraemia was drug intake (diuretics + antihypertensives), which constituted 42 (42%) of the total 100 patients, followed by SIADH in 33 (33%) patients. Among the aetiologies of SIADH, cerebrovascular accident was the most common (9/100), followed by pneumonia and Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) in five patients each. Among the non neurological symptoms, vomiting was the most common symptom in 28 (28%) patients, followed by lethargy in 15 (15%). Among the neurological symptoms associated with hyponatraemia, confusion was the predominant one seen in 10 (10%) patients, followed by drowsiness in 7 (7%).

Conclusion: SIADH is an important cause of hyponatraemia with a high prevalence. The prevalence of SIADH in hyponatraemic patients was 33%. Among the aetiologies of SIADH, cerebrovascular accident was the most common.

Keywords

Antihypertensive agents, Inappropriate secretion, Morbidity, Salt depletion, Sodium

The most typical electrolyte imbalance in hospitalised patients, occurring in upto 6% of cases, is hyponatraemia (1). It happens because the complex multisystem physiological mechanisms that typically maintain salt and water balance are disrupted. Mild hyponatraemia is typically asymptomatic, but major neurological problems can develop as a result of cerebral oedema when the reduction in serum sodium is large (125 mmol/L) or acute (48 hours). These problems include non cardiogenic pulmonary oedema, hyponatraemic encephalopathy, seizures, coma, and death (2).

Previous studies contend that, among medical patients, the aetiology of hyponatraemia was a more significant predictive factor than the absolute amount of serum sodium. The treatment of underlying causes of hyponatraemia and re-establishing salt and water balance are the cornerstones of the clinical care of hyponatraemia (3),(4),(5). However, it is notoriously difficult to pinpoint the exact cause of hyponatraemia. One of the most frequent causes of severe hyponatraemia is SIADH (2). Clinical and biochemical standards based on Bartter’s original description are necessary for an accurate diagnosis (6).

According to numerous research studies, the primary aetiologies of SIADH are idiopathic, pulmonary, and Central Nervous System (CNS) causes (7),(8),(9). Because severe hyponatraemia in medical inpatients has a poor prognosis and its aetiology is complex, it is crucial for doctors to conduct an accurate clinical assessment and appropriate biochemical tests, as these results will dictate the course of treatment (7).

Although SIADH is reported as one of the most common causes of hyponatraemia in the literature, very few studies have been conducted to generate evidence regarding its prevalence. Hence, the present study was conducted to assess the prevalence of SIADH in hyponatraemia. The objectives were to determine the aetiology of SIADH, its distribution, and the severity of hyponatraemia in the study population.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of General Medicine at Jubilee Mission Medical College and Hospital, Thrissur, Kerala, India. The study duration was one year and six months, from December 2014 to June 2016. The Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) approved the conduct of the present study (ECR/835/KL/INST/2015/06), and written informed consent was obtained from study participants.

Inclusion criteria: A total of 100 patients admitted with a serum sodium value <135 meq/L and aged over 18 years in the Medicine Department were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients under 18 years of age and those who were not willing to be admitted or receive further treatment were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: According to Babaliche P et al., (2), considering the prevalence of SIADH in hyponatraemia as 40% with a precision of 10% and a 95% confidence interval, the sample size was calculated as follows:

N=Z21-α/2*p*(1-p)/d2

Z1-α/2-two tailed probability for 95% confidence interval=1.96
p (%)-prevalence of SIADH=0.4
d (%)-precision or allowable error for severe hyponatraemia=0.1
N=1.962 * 0.4 * (1-0.4) / 0.12
N=92.2

Thus, the total sample size required for the study was 92. To account for a non participation rate, another eight subjects were added. So, the final sample size was 100.

The patients included in the study were admitted with various illnesses and stayed in the hospital for an average of 10 days. The diagnosis of SIADH was based on the following criteria:

Essential criteria:

- Extracellular Fluid (ECF) effective osmolality below 270 mOsm/kg water
- Inappropriate urinary concentration (>100 mOsm/kg)
- Clinical euvolaemia (absence of signs of hypovolaemia and hypervolaemia)
- Increased urinary (Na+) while on a normal salt and water intake
- Absence of adrenal, thyroid, pituitary, or renal insufficiency or diuretic use (10).

Supplemental criteria:

- Abnormal water load test (inability to excrete atleast 90% of 20 mL/kg water load in four hours and/or failure to dilute urinary osmolality to below 100 mOsm/kg)
- Arginine Vasopressin Plasma (AVP) level inappropriately raised relative to plasma osmolality
- No significant correction of plasma (Na+) with volume expansion but improvement after fluid restriction.

The patients were classified based on the severity of hyponatraemia into:

- Mild hyponatraemia: 131-134 meq/L
- Moderate hyponatraemia: 120-130 meq/L
- Severe hyponatraemia: <120 meq/L, as per the hyponatraemia guideline development group (10).

These patients were evaluated for the underlying cause of hyponatraemia, which included a detailed history and physical examination followed by appropriate laboratory investigations. A complete history was taken, assessing symptomatology related to the neurological system, such as confusion, ataxia, seizures, stupor, and non neurological symptoms, such as vomiting, hiccups, postural dizziness, lethargy, and muscle cramps. The intake of medications that might cause hyponatraemia was inquired about, and existing co-morbidities were noted. A complete physical examination was conducted, including assessing the hydration status of the patient and signs of hypovolaemia. The hydration status of the patients was clinically evaluated, considering poor skin turgor, mucous membrane dryness, and sunken eyes as signs of hypovolaemia, and oedema and raised jugular venous pulse as signs of hypervolaemia. Patients without these signs were grouped as euvolemic. Plasma and urine osmolality were also assessed, along with investigation findings and radiological reports. All data were collected using a case report form.

Statistical Analysis

The collected data were entered into MS Excel. Descriptive analysis was performed using the mean and standard deviation for continuous variables, and frequency and percentage for categorical variables. Comparisons were made using appropriate statistical tests and represented in tables and figures.

Results

Among the 100 patients, the maximum number of patients with hyponatraemia were in the 59-78 years age group, and males were more common (Table/Fig 1).

Among the non neurological symptoms, vomiting was the most common symptom, seen in 28 (28%) patients, followed by lethargy in 15 (15%) patients. Among the neurological symptoms associated with hyponatraemia, confusion was the predominant symptom, seen in 10% of patients, followed by drowsiness in 7 (7%) patients (Table/Fig 1).

The most common cause of hyponatraemia was drug intake (diuretics+antihypertensives), which was seen in 42 out of 100 patients. SIADH was the cause in 33 (33%) patients (Table/Fig 2). Among the 100 patients, 20 (20%) had severe hyponatraemia, 38 (38%) had moderate hyponatraemia, and 42 (42%) had mild hyponatraemia (Table/Fig 3).

Among the aetiology of hyponatraemia, salt restriction in the diet (42%) was the most common cause, followed by Diabetes Mellitus (DM) (33%) (Table/Fig 4).

Among the aetiologies of SIADH (33), cerebrovascular accident was the most common (9 out of 100 patients), followed by pneumonia and SSRIs, each seen in five patients (Table/Fig 5).

Individuals with severe hyponatraemia (serum sodium <120) were the only ones who had disorientation as a presenting symptom. Among the 7% of patients who reported being sleepy, 5% had severe hyponatraemia. Both of the stupor patients exhibited severe hyponatraemia. Six individuals suffered seizures, and five of them had severe hyponatraemia (Table/Fig 6).

Discussion

The current study in Kerala showed that SIADH in hyponatraemia was 33%. Patients with hyponatraemia were more prevalent in the 59-78 years age range. A study by Agarwal SM and Agrawal A at JIPMER and NIMHANS reported a mean age of 48.1±16.1 years for 70 consecutive patients with blood sodium ≤125 mmol/L at presentation or during hospital stay (11). This finding was consistent with the present study’s findings. Another study by Padhi R et al., at the Institute of Medical Sciences and SUM Hospital in Bhubaneswar, Odisha, found a mean age of 60.4±17.2 years (12). A study on the clinico-aetiological profile and outcome of hyponatraemia in hospitalised adult patients at Kamalnayan Bajaj Hospital, Aurangabad, also reported a similar age range (13).

In the present study, out of a total of 100 patients, 54 were men and 46 were women, indicating that men were more likely to have hyponatraemia than women. This slight increase in male incidence was not considered significant, as the hospital population generally has a higher ratio of males to females.

Among the 100 patients, 42 (42%) had severe hyponatraemia, the highest percentage in the group. Thirty-eight patients (38%) had moderate hyponatraemia, and 20 patients (20%) had mild hyponatraemia. A study conducted in a tertiary care hospital’s medical ward from March 2010 to April 2011 reported that 2.4% of patients had severe hyponatraemia (Na <120 meq/L) (14). The age range of the majority of patients with severe hyponatraemia in that study was 59 to 78 years. A significant number of individuals older than 78 also had severe hyponatraemia (10 out of 14) (14). In the present study, diuretics and antihypertensives were the most frequent causes of hyponatraemia, accounting for 42 out of every 100 patients. Among the 100 patients, 33% developed SIADH. The most common cause of SIADH in the study was cerebrovascular accident, considered as a co-morbidity. Pneumonia was the second most common cause of SIADH, considered as the primary disease. Thiazides combined with angiotensin receptor blockers or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors accounted for the majority of prescriptions (17%). Other causes of hyponatraemia included dehydration, chronic liver disease, congestive cardiac failure, hypothyroidism, renal failure, adrenal insufficiency, and the use of diuretics and antihypertensives. Diuretics are a significant contributor to hyponatraemia due to their widespread use (15),(16),(17).

A total of 25 (50%) patients in the study were on diuretics, which was the most common cause of hyponatraemia according to a study of hyponatraemia in adult hospital inpatients at Al-Diwania Teaching Hospital (18). Sixteen patients (32%) had heart failure. In another study at Sreebalaji Medical College in Chennai, 24 out of 100 patients developed SIADH (24%), which was the most common cause of hyponatraemia (19). Robertson GL studied hyponatraemia in patients with spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage and found that drugs, especially diuretics like furosemide and hydrochlorothiazide, contributed significantly to the cause of hyponatraemia (9). A study at Kamalnayan Bajaj Hospital in Aurangabad from August 2013 to August 2014 also reported that diuretics (53%) were the most common aetiological factor of hyponatraemia (13).

Out of the 100 patients, 58 individuals were using medications that caused hyponatraemia. The most common medications causing hyponatraemia were thiazides combined with ACEIs/ARBs, loop diuretics, thiazides alone, SSRIs, TCAs, carbamazepine, psychiatric medications, and MAOIs. Caution should be exercised when administering diuretics due to their known harmful side-effects, including hyponatraemia. Hyponatraemia is also attributed to ARBs/ACEIs. The incidence of hyponatraemia caused by various antihypertensives is rising with the increased use of these medications. In this study, only combinations of medications and diuretics were identified as the culprits behind hyponatraemia. Many patients in the study followed a self-imposed salt restriction in their diet as part of hypertension control.

Confusion was the most common neurological symptom of hyponatraemia, occurring in 10% of patients, followed by sleepiness in 7% of cases. Ataxia, stupor, and seizures were among the other typical neurological symptoms (20). In this study, individuals with severe hyponatraemia (serum sodium <120) were the only ones who had disorientation as a presenting symptom. 5% of the 7% of patients who reported being sleepy had severe hyponatraemia. Both of the stupor patients exhibited severe hyponatraemia. Six individuals suffered seizures, and five of them had severe hyponatraemia. In a study of the clinico-etiological profile and outcomes of hyponatraemia in hospitalised adult patients at Kamalnayan Bajaj Hospital in Aurangabad, 76 patients were studied. It was determined that nausea (54%) was the most common gastrointestinal symptom and drowsiness (42%) was the most common neurological symptom. Hypertension (26% of patients) was the most prevalent ailment, followed by diabetes mellitus (33%), cardiac disease (25%), cerebrovascular accident (18%), chronic kidney disease (14%), chronic liver disease (7%), and hypothyroidism (7%), among other frequent conditions. Another study by Natkunam A et al., found that older people with concomitant disorders like cardiac, renal, or hepatic failure were more susceptible to hyponatraemia (21). The most common co-morbid disorders in the study at Kamalnayan Bajaj Hospital were hypertension (51%) and diabetes mellitus (42%). A study conducted in Istanbul, Turkey, examined the relationship between the severity of hyponatraemia and co-morbidity in elderly patients who develop hyponatraemia (22). The clinical implication of the current study was that the findings will aid physicians in prioritising the cause of SIADH for effective management.

Limitation(s)

This was a single-centre study, so there was no diversity in the included study population. As a cross-sectional study, follow-ups were not conducted.

Conclusion

SIADH is an important cause of hyponatraemia with a high prevalence. Among the aetiology of SIADH, cerebrovascular accidents are the most common, followed by pneumonia and the use of SSRIs. Tracing out SIADH as a cause of hyponatraemia, after excluding other causes, can be a difficult task but it is worth it as it can unmask and treat many correctable causes of hyponatraemia.

References

1.
Bhasin Chhabra B, Veitla V, Weinberg S, Koratala A. Demystifying hyponatremia: A clinical guide to evaluation and management. Nutr Clin Prac. 2022;37(5):1023-32. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Babaliche P, Madnani S, Kamat S. Clinical profile of patients admitted with hyponatremia in the medical intensive care unit. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2017;21(12):819-24. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Liamis G, Megapanou E, Elisaf M, Milionis H. Hyponatremia-inducing drugs. Front Horm Res. 2019;52:167-77. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Rodenburg EM, Hoorn EJ, Ruiter R, Lous JJ, Hofman A, Uitterlinden AG, et al. Thiazide-associated hyponatremia: A population-based study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;62(1):67-72. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
De las Peñas R, Ponce S, Henao F, Camps Herrero C, Carcereny E, Escobar Ãlvarez Y. SIADH-related hyponatremia in hospital day care units: Clinical experience and management with tolvaptan. Support Care in Cancer. 2016;24:499-507. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Janicic N, Verbalis JG. Evaluation and management of hypo-osmolality in hospitalized patients. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2003;32(2):459-81. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Burst V. Etiology and epidemiology of hyponatremia. Front Horm Res. 2019;52:24-35. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Chow KM, Kwan BC, Szeto CC. Clinical studies of thiazide-induced hyponatremia. J Natl Med Assoc. 2004;96(10):1305-08.
9.
Robertson GL. Disorders of the Neurohypophysis. In: Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine, Kasper DL, Jameson J, Fauci AS, , Hauser SL, Longo DL, Loscalzo J. eds. , 17th edition volume 11 2222. McGraw Hill; 2018.
10.
Verbalis, JG. In Diseases of the Kidney Schrier RW, Gottschalk CW eds. 6 th ed, 2400. Boston: Little Brown. 1997.
11.
Agarwal SM, Agrawal A. A comparative study of the clinicoetiological profile of hyponatremia at presentation with that developing in the hospital. Indian J Med Res. 2011;134(1):118-22.
12.
Padhi R, Panda BN, Jagati S, Patra SC. Hyponatremia in critically ill patients. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2014;18(2):83-87. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Baji PP, Borkar SS. Clinicoetiological profile and outcome of hyponatremia in hospitalised adult patients. Int J Sci Rep. 2015;1(7):293-98. [crossref]
14.
Chatterjee N, Sengupta N, Das C, Chowdhuri AR, Basu AK, Pal SK. A descriptive study of hyponatremia in a tertiary care hospital of Eastern India. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;16(2):288-91. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Schrier RW. Body water homeostasis: Clinical disorders of urinary dilution and concentration. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17(7):1820-32. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Bal C, Gompelmann D, Krebs M, Antoniewicz L, Guttmann-Ducke C, Lehmann A, et al. Acute symptomatic hyponatremia in setting of SIADH as an isolated presentation of COVID-19. IDCases. 2020;21:e00859. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Bal C, Gompelmann D, Krebs M, Antoniewicz L, Guttmann-Ducke C, Lehmann A, et al. Associations of hyponatremia and SIADH with increased mortality, young age and infection parameters in patients with tuberculosis. Plos one. 2022;17(10):e0275827. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
AL-Barqawi ARH. A study of hyponatremia in hospitalized patients. QMJ. 2007;3(4):112-14.
19.
Padma V, Javid SM, Narendran, Anand NN. Study of symptomatic hyponatremia in elderly patients. Int J Pharm Bio Sci. 2016;7(2)B:434-40.
20.
Hunnur M, Bhat R, Bhat KR, Kannan V, Kavitha VP. A prospective study of SIADH in hospitalised patients. Journal of the Association of Physicians of India. 2001;49:0004-5772.
21.
Natkunam A, Shek CC, Swaminathan R. Hyponatremia in a hospital population. J Med. 1991;22(2):83-96.
22.
Kayar NB, Kayar Y, Ekinci I, Erdem ED, Ismailova M, Sit D. Relation between severity of hyponatremia and comorbidity in elderly patients who develop hyponatremia. Bio Med. 2016;27(3):872-76.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/62752.18434

Date of Submission: Jan 09, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Mar 09, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Aug 04, 2023
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 10, 2023
• Manual Googling: Mar 22, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jul 26, 2023 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com