Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 49408

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2023 | Month : August | Volume : 17 | Issue : 8 | Page : ZD07 - ZD11 Full Version

Recurrence of Ameloblastoma on the Right Side of the Mandible: A Case Report


Published: August 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/62685.18335
KR Shakila, LP Raghupathy, RM Aravindh Swamy, J Sowmiya

1. Professor, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Dental Sciences, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Dental Sciences, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Dental Sciences, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Postgraduate, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Dental Sciences, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. KR Shakila,
Professor, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Dental Sciences, Chinnakolambakkam, Madhuranthagam, Chengalpattu-603308, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: shakilasuresh100@yahoo.com

Abstract

Ameloblastoma is a benign, locally invasive epithelial odontogenic tumour occuring in the jaw. Among all types, multicystic ameloblastoma is a locally aggressive lesion and prone to recurrence. Hereby, the authors present a case report of a 23-year-old female with a chief complaint of painful swelling on the right lower third of the face for the past one month. History revealed a gradual increase in size of the swelling, along with intermittent and non radiating pain that worsened during mastication and improved with rest. Patient past history revealed similar swelling in the same region twice, with the first occurring five-years-ago and a recurrence after two years of treatment. Both the episodes were treated with laser ablative surgery and extraction of the affected tooth. The patient presented with recurrent swelling one month ago and underwent an incisional biopsy, which revealed a histopathological diagnosis of unicystic ameloblastoma. Additional investigations, including an occlusal radiograph, orthopantomogram, and Computed Tomography (CT), were performed. Based on the recurrence, clinical examination, and investigations, the present case was diagnosed as unicystic ameloblastoma. It was treated with segmental resection followed by reconstruction of the mandible using a free fibula graft was planned. The prognosis was good, and regular follow-up has been maintained for the last four months, with the patient still under review. The uniqueness of present case lies in the patient’s second decade of life, three episodes of recurrence within five years, and the treatment approach of segmental mandibulectomy with immediate free fibula graft reconstruction. This procedure reduces the risk of recurrence, allows for full rehabilitation within a short period, and minimises the number of surgical procedures.

Keywords

Acanthomatous ameloblastoma, Mixed/solid type, Squamous metaplasia

Case Report

A 23-year-old female patient presented to the Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Dental Sciences, with a chief complaint of painful swelling in the lower back jaw region of the face for the past one month. The history of the presenting illness revealed that the swelling gradually increased in size and was accompanied by intermittent, non radiating pain that worsened during mastication and was relieved by rest. The intra oral images have been shown in (Table/Fig 1)a-c. The patient had no relevant medical history. Past dental history revealed two previous episodes of similar swelling in the same region. The first episode occurred seven years ago, during which the patient visited a private clinic where radiographic investigation and panoramic imaging were performed (Table/Fig 2)a. The imaging showed a large radiolucent area extending from the apical region of tooth (according to the Federation Dentaire Internationale tooth numbering system). Based on the radiographic interpretation, it was diagnosed as unicystic ameloblastoma. The patient underwent endodontic procedures (Root Canal Treatment of 44), extraction of tooth 47, and laser ablative surgery in September 2017. Follow-up radiographic investigations were performed after the procedure (Table/Fig 2)b.

For a period of one and a half years, the patient remained normal. However, patient noticed recurrent swelling in the same region, for which patient revisited the previously visited private clinic. The patient underwent laser ablative surgery for the second time in September 2019. Subsequent radiographic investigations, including an orthopantomogram, showed mixed radiopacities and radiolucencies extending from the apical region of tooth 43 to 45 as a follow-up (Table/Fig 3)a,b. Approximately one year ago, the patient developed another painful swelling similar to previous episodes and sought treatment at a private Dental College in Chennai, India. Radiographic investigations, including an orthopantomogram, revealed multilocular radiopacities and radiolucencies extending from the apical region of tooth 43 to 47 (Table/Fig 4), with mesial root resorption on 47. An occlusal radiograph showed buccal cortical plate expansion with radiopacities (Table/Fig 5).

Computed tomography revealed buccal and lingual cortical bone expansion of the right body of the mandible (Table/Fig 6). An incisional biopsy was performed, and the results indicated a diagnosis of unicystic ameloblastoma.

On extraoral examination and inspection, evidence of facial asymmetry was observed on the right side of the face, attributed to a single diffuse swelling measuring approximately 5×4 cm. The swelling was roughly oval in shape and extended anteriorly from 2 cm below the right commissure of the lip at the parasymphysis region, posteriorly up to the right angle of the mandible, superiorly 1 cm below the infraorbital region, and inferiorly along the right lower border of the mandible. The skin over the swelling appeared normal with no secondary changes. Palpation confirmed the size, shape, and extension of the swelling, which was found to be hard in consistency and tender, without any evident bleeding or pus discharge. Intraoral examination revealed an exophytic bony swelling over the right lower alveolar ridge, extending anteriorly from the distal aspect of 43 to the posterior aspect of tooth 48. The affected area exhibited hardness and tenderness, with missing teeth 44, 45, 46, and 47.

Based on the history of recurrence, clinical findings, radiographic findings, and histopathological report (Table/Fig 7)a,b, a provisional diagnosis of recurrent unicystic ameloblastoma of the right body of the mandible was made, considering the differential diagnosis of odontogenic keratocyst, calcifying odontogenic cyst, peripheral giant cell granuloma, and odontogenic myxoma. The treatment involved intermaxillary fixation (Table/Fig 8), followed by segmental mandibulectomy and free fibula graft reconstruction. The patient was positioned supine, and general anesthesia was administered via right nasoendotracheal intubation. A 2% lignocaine with adrenaline was injected along the incision line. Incisions were made using a no. 15 Bard Parker (BP) blade. A subplatysmal flap was raised, and the right common facial vein and facial artery were identified and ligated. The right submandibular gland, along with its duct, was excised using an oscillating saw. A vertical cut was made from the 42 region (Table/Fig 8), with extraction of 42, while another cut was made beyond the third molar at the angle region, completing the segmental mandibulectomy.

A tourniquet was placed on the left thigh and inflated to 300 mmHg. Painting and draping were done in the usual manner. The fibula above the left leg was marked using Doppler and skin paddles to identify and mark the myocutaneous flap perforation. Incisions were made over the markings, and layer-by-layer dissection was performed. The flexor hallucis longus muscle, along with its lateral and anterior compartments, was dissected. The posterior intermuscular septum was dissected, and the peroneal artery and vein were identified in the posterior compartment. The fibula bone was exposed along the plane of dissection, and approximately 8 cm of fibula bone was harvested along with the skin paddle. Osteotomy cuts were made with an oscillating saw at the distal and proximal ends. The donor site was closed primarily. Approximately 5.5 cm of fibula was customised to match the shape of the segmental defect in the mandible and was fixed using two titanium mini plates. Microvascular anastomosis was performed, connecting the facial artery to the peroneal artery and the facial vein to the peroneal vein. The osteomyocutaneous flap was sutured to the lower vestibule using 3-0 Vicryl. Suturing was done in two layers using 3-0 Vicryl and 2-0 Ethilon.

Orthopantomogram and Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) showed successful bony reconstruction of the right side of the mandible, from the symphysis to the angle of the mandible, using titanium miniplate fixation screws. There were no signs of relapse during the one-month, two-month, and four-month follow-up (Table/Fig 9)a-c,(Table/Fig 10),(Table/Fig 11)a,b. The prognosis was good, and regular follow-up with the patient has been maintained for the last four months, with the patient still under review.

Discussion

Ameloblastoma is defined as unicentric, non functional, intermittent in growth, anatomically benign, and clinically persistent, as described by Robinson HBG (1). It is one of the most common odontogenic tumours, known for its potential to grow extensively and cause severe bone deformity. Ameloblastoma arises from remnants of the tissues involved in tooth formation and represents approximately 1% (2) of all oral ectodermal tumours and 11% of all odontogenic tumours. It predominantly occurs in the third, fourth, and fifth decades of life, with a higher incidence in males, and most commonly affects the posterior mandible. Around 50-80% of cases are associated with an unerupted or impacted tooth. Ameloblastoma can be classified into unicystic, multicystic, peripheral, and intraosseous subtypes. Histopathological variants include follicular, plexiform, acanthomatous, and granular cell types, with uncommon variants such as desmoplastic, basal cell, clear cell, and keratoameloblastoma (3).

Clinically, ameloblastoma is characterised as a slow-growing, locally aggressive lesion, which can cause mobility and root resorption in the associated teeth. Radiographically, it appears as unilocular or multilocular radiolucencies with well-defined borders. The multilocular appearance resembles soap bubbles, indicating the presence of multiple bony spaces separated by trabeculae. Treatment options for ameloblastoma include enucleation, curettage, marsupialisation, cryosurgery, electrocautery, sclerotherapy, radiotherapy, and segmental or complete resection with reconstruction. The first description of ameloblastoma was made by Cusack JW in 1827 (4), and the term “ameloblastoma” was suggested by Churchill in 1934 to replace the term “adamantinoma” coined by Malassez L (5) in 1885. Ameloblastoma is a benign epithelial odontogenic tumour that is often aggressive and destructive. It originates from various sources, including cell rests of the dental organ (such as remnants of the dental lamina (cell rests of Serres) or remnants of Hertwig’s sheath), epithelium of odontogenic cysts (such as dentigerous cysts and odontomas), disturbances in the development of the enamel organ, and basal cells of the surface epithelial rests of Malassez L of the jaws (6).

Ameloblastoma occurs predominantly in young adults, with a mean age of 35 years, and shows a higher incidence in males. It is more commonly found in the mandible than in the maxilla, with a ratio of 13:1. It accounts for approximately 97.4% of mandibular cases, with the body, ramus, and angle being the most frequently affected sites. In the 2017 classification by the World Health Organisation (WHO) (7), ameloblastoma is categorised as conventional/solid/multicystic (86% of cases), unicystic (13% of cases), peripheral/extraosseous (about 1% of cases), and malignant ameloblastoma. Typically, ameloblastoma is asymptomatic and exhibits slow growth, although it may rarely cause pain and paresthesia. The lesion is commonly associated with the crowns of mandibular third molars but can also be found in interradicular, periapical, and edentulous regions. It can penetrate the cortical bone and cause tooth resorption. Conventional ameloblastoma often infiltrates the cancellous bone trabeculae at the periphery of the lesion before radiographic evidence of bone resorption becomes visible. Due to its local invasiveness and destructive nature, ameloblastoma can lead to deformity of the jaws, masticatory dysfunction, and abnormal jaw movement, including involvement of the Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ). Radiographically (8), ameloblastoma presents with soap bubble-like, honeycomb, or eggshell cracking appearances, which may mimic other tumours such as odontogenic keratocysts, aneurysmal bone cysts, or giant cell tumours. Differential diagnosis includes dentigerous cysts, odontogenic keratocysts, odontogenic myxomas, aneurysmal bone cysts, fibrous dysplasia, odontomas, and osteosarcomas (9). In this particular case, the patient was a female in second decade of life who had a history of recurrent ameloblastoma at the same site. The initial surgical treatment performed was marginal resection. The last recurrence occurred three years ago, and now the patient has presented for the third time with radiological findings suggestive of a multilocular radiolucency. According to a study by Li Y et al., (10), radiographic examinations can be used for diagnosing and planning the treatment of ameloblastoma, especially in cases of unicystic ameloblastomas characterised by a fibrous cyst wall lined by ameloblastic epithelium.

Histopathologically, follicular ameloblastoma is characterised by islands of epithelium resembling enamel organ epithelium with a core of stellate reticulum-like cells embedded in a mature fibrous connective tissue stroma. A plexiform pattern is characterised by long, anastomosing chords or sheets of odontogenic epithelium. Unicystic ameloblastoma, on the other hand, presents as a circumscribed unicystic lesion lined by ameloblastic epithelium and containing eosinophilic to haemorrhagic material (Table/Fig 7). The underlying dense fibrous stroma shows proliferating fibroblasts, scattered osteoclast-like giant cells, areas of newly formed woven bone trabeculae, and vascular channels. Radiographs provide valuable information about bone destruction, the presence of multiple locules, and bone reactions.

A literature review revealed that the most common histologic pattern of ameloblastoma was follicular (48.1%), followed by reticular (37%), basaloid (7.4%), and mixed (7.4%) (11). In males, the predominant tumour patterns were reticular (50%), follicular (35%), mixed (10%), and basaloid (5%). In females, the most common type was follicular (six out of seven cases; 85.7%), followed by basaloid (14.3%). Various treatment modalities have been employed, including electrocautery, cryosurgery, injection of sclerosing agents, enucleation, curettage, marsupialisation, cryosurgery, and segmental or complete resection with reconstruction. Recurrence rates were reported by Lau SL and Samman N as 3.6% for resection, 30.5% for enucleation alone, 16% for enucleation followed by Carnoy’s solution application (which consists of 60% ethanol, 30% chloroform, 10% glacial acetic acid, and 1 gram of ferric chloride), and 18% for marsupialisation followed by enucleation (12). Simple treatment with enucleation or curettage often presents a high potential for recurrence (60-80%). Therefore, the interpretation of clinical and imaging data is crucial for early diagnosis and effective treatment of ameloblastoma. The therapeutic decision should aim to eliminate the pathology, considering the treatment method’s morbidity and the patient’s quality of life during rehabilitation.

According to a retrospective study conducted by Vayvada H et al., involving 21 patients with mandibular ameloblastoma who underwent segmental mandibulectomy with free fibula graft reconstruction, was conducted (13). Only four patients experienced complications or recurrence during an average follow-up of five years (13). Segmental mandibulectomy with free fibula graft reconstruction is considered an ideal treatment method for mandibular ameloblastoma, providing satisfactory functional and aesthetic results. Another retrospective study by Ooi A et al., reviewed 30 consecutive patients with unicystic ameloblastoma who were treated with segmental mandibulectomy and free fibula graft reconstruction (14). At an average follow-up of five years, no tumour recurrences were observed, and 96% of the patients reported satisfaction with their appearance.

Due to its slow growth, ameloblastoma can reappear after several years. Therefore, annual follow-ups for at least 10 years are recommended. Despite undergoing laser ablative surgery twice, the patient experienced a recurrence within five years. Complete resection of the lesion, involving wide surgical excision with clear margins, is crucial to prevent recurrences due to the aggressive nature of ameloblastoma.

Conclusion

The treatment of marginal resection with a safety margin proved to be ineffective in this reported case of mandibular ameloblastoma. Due to multiple recurrences, segmental resection with free fibula reconstruction was performed. However, long-term follow-up remains crucial in light of the local aggressiveness and high recurrence rate associated with this condition. If the patient had undergone complete resection of the lesion during the initial episode, it would have ultimately reduced the time, cost, number of surgical procedures, and improved functional and aesthetic outcomes. Therefore, factors such as the patient’s age, the aggressive nature of the lesion, its location, and the high likelihood of recurrence should all be carefully considered, before deciding on any surgical interventions.

References

1.
Robinson HBG. Ameloblastoma: A survey of 379 cases from the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1937;23:831-43.
2.
Becelli R, Carboni A, Cerulli G, Perugini M, Iannetti G. Mandibular ameloblastoma: Analysis of surgical treatment carried out in 60 patients between 1977 and 1998. J Craniofac Surg. 2002;13(3):395-400; discussion 400. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Pillai RS, Ongole R, Ahsan A, Radhakrishnan RA, Pai KM. Recurrent desmoplastic ameloblastoma of the maxilla: A case report. J Can Dent Assoc. 2004;70(2):100-04. PMID: 14756940.
4.
Cusack JW. Report of the amputations of the lower jaw. Dubl Hosp Rec. 1827;4:01-38.
5.
Malassez L. Sur Le role des debris epitheliaux papdentaires. Arch Physiol Norm Pathol. 1885;5:309-40; 6:379-449.
6.
Sivapathasundaram B. Shafer’s Textbook of oral pathology. Elsilver Health Sciences; 2020.
7.
Soluk-Tekkes¸in M, Wright JM. The World Health Organization classification of Odontogenic Lesions: A Summary of the Changes of the 2017 (4th) Edition. Turk Patoloji Dergisi. 2018;34(1):01-18. Doi: 10.5146/tjpath.2017.01410. PMID 28984343. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
More C, Tailor M, Patel HJ, Asrani M, Thakkar K. Radiographic analysis of ameloblastoma: A retrospective study. Indian J Dent Res. 2012;23(5):698. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Slater LJ. Diagnostic criteria for unicystic ameloblastoma: Ameloblastic versus ameloblastomatous epithelium. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;111(5):536. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Li Y, Han B, Li LJ. Prognostic and proliferative evaluation of ameloblastoma based on radiographic boundary. Int J Oral Sci. 2012;4(1)e30. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Abtahi MA, Zandi A, Razmjoo H, Ghaffari S, Abtahi SM, Jahanbani-Ardakani H, et al. Orbital invasion of ameloblastoma: A systematic review apropos of a rare entity. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2017;30(1):23-34. Published 2017 Nov 6. Doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2017.09.00. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Lau SL, Samman N. Recurrence related to treatment modalities of unicystic ameloblastoma: A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;35(8):681-90.[crossref][PubMed]
13.
Vayvada H, Mola F, Menderes A, Yilmaz M. Surgical management of ameloblastoma in the mandible: Segmental mandibulectomy and immediate reconstruction with free fibula or deep circumflex iliac artery flap (evaluation of the long-term esthetic and functional results). J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64(10):1532-39. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Ooi A, Feng J, Tan HK, Ong YS. Primary treatment of mandibular ameloblastoma with segmental resection and free fibula reconstruction: Achieving satisfactory outcomes with low implant-prosthetic rehabilitation uptake. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67(4):498-505.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/62685.18335

Date of Submission: Jan 05, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Feb 24, 2023
Date of Acceptance: May 04, 2023
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 06, 2023
• Manual Googling: Mar 16, 2023
• iThenticate Software: May 02, 2023 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com