Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 41418

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : August | Volume : 17 | Issue : 8 | Page : YC06 - YC10 Full Version

Impact of Different Types of Bikes on Post-ride Pain and Insights into Strategies Adopted by Recreational Cyclists from Gurugram to Alleviate Pain: A Cross-sectional Survey


Published: August 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/64151.18314
Aparna Gupta, Sheetal Kalra

1. PhD Scholar, Department of Physiotherapy, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University, New Delhi, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University, New Delhi, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Aparna Gupta,
PhD Scholar, Department of Physiotherapy, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University, New Delhi-110017, India.
E-mail: aparnaa.gupta0@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Non-traumatic injuries are prevalent among long-distance cyclists. However, there is a lack of studies analysing the impact of different types of bikes on the pain experienced by cyclists or the physiotherapy measures commonly adopted by cyclists post-ride.

Aim: To understand the impact of different types of bikes on the pain experienced by cyclists and to identify the physiotherapeutic measures commonly adopted by Indian cyclists.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on 120 cyclists (94 males and 26 females) from three different cycling groups in Gurugram, Haryana, India. Data was collected from August 2022 to September 2022. A self-structured questionnaire was used to collect information on sociodemographic profile, type of bike used, duration of cycling, average distance and speed covered, areas and types of pain experienced, and measures taken to address pain. The data was analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24.0. The level of significance was set at p≤0.05. Data was presented as frequencies and percentages, and comparisons were made using Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-square tests.

Results: The mean age of the study participants was 39.36±11.88 years. The average speed and distance covered in one ride were 22.52±4.73 km/hour and 43.50±15.32 km, respectively. A statistically significant association between the type of bike used and pain status (p<0.05) was observed. 65% of riders reported experiencing pain in some part of their body in the last six months. Pain was more prevalent among hybrid bike users compared to mountain and road bike users. Male cyclists had a faster average speed compared to female cyclists by 5 km/hour. The average distance covered by male and female cyclists was similar, with just a 1 km difference. Cyclists commonly experienced pain in the wrists, legs, back, and neck. 19.1% of riders did nothing or only rested to address pain, while 21.66% opted for muscle stretching, 9.16% engaged in exercises, and 3.33% used cycling gloves for wrist and hand pain. Other measures included Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), dry needling, icing, refitting or changing the bike, and taking supplements.

Conclusion: Among different types of bikes, hybrid bike users showed a higher incidence of pain. Cyclists in Gurugram tend to utilise limited physiotherapy measures to alleviate pain and enhance performance.

Keywords

Hybrid bike, Mountain bike, Non-traumatic injuries, Physiotherapy

In the post-pandemic era, people have increasingly turned to cycling as a recreational activity. It not only enhances their aerobic capacity but also allows them to exercise without coming into contact with others. Cycling has gained popularity due to its ease of indulgence, low maintenance requirements, and the independence it offers to cyclists (1). There are three commonly used types of bikes: road bikes, hybrids, and mountain bikes. Each of these bikes serves different purposes and has distinct designs. Cyclists choose their preferred type based on their individual preferences (2). For example, if a cyclist’s goal is to build strength, they may opt for a mountain bike. If their aim is to cycle at high speeds, they may choose a road bike, which is designed to be aerodynamic and lightweight. Hybrids, on the other hand, offer a combination of features from both designs, allowing for relatively high speeds while being more sturdy compared to road bikes. In the context of Indian roads, hybrids have been found to work well for long rides. Although their design and performance characteristics, such as the interim design of their tires between road bikes and mountain bikes, are known, it is yet to be explored which type of bike causes the most pain in riders (3).

The best way to avoid injuries when riding a bicycle is to encourage people to wear helmets. Other preventive measures include wearing protective gear and clothing and following general safety guidelines (4). The majority of mountain bike accidents occur in riders between the ages of 20 and 39 (5). In the event of a crash, the saddle and seat-post may cause genital and rectal injuries (6), while landing on the handlebars can lead to visceral and vascular penetration (7). Bicyclists who regularly ride their bikes, especially those involved in professional racing, are at risk of developing overuse injuries. These can be mostly prevented by ensuring that the bicycle’s handlebars, pedals, seat (saddle), and size are all properly adjusted (4),(8). The cyclist’s upper body position, which places the neck in a hyperextended position and the lower back in a flexed position, often leads to neck and back pain (9),(10). Recommendations for addressing these issues include shortening the handlebar reach and creating a slight upward tilt of the saddle (10 to 15 degrees). Regularly changing hand and arm positions on the handlebars, while keeping the elbows slightly flexed, is also advised. Rest, stretching exercises, and anti-inflammatory medications are additional measures (8),(9),(10). Compression neuropathies in the hands may occur due to persistent pressure on the handlebars and improper wrist positioning (11). The deep palmar branch of the ulnar nerve, located near the Guyon tunnel (ulnar tunnel) and anterior to the palmar fascia, is most commonly affected (8),(12). Research on elite professional cyclists suggests a higher prevalence of overuse injuries and a different pattern of lesions compared to other demographics. Clavicle fractures are among the most common traumatic injuries (13). In otherwise healthy individuals with risk factors for hip discomfort, an improper bicycle fit can contribute to hip complaints (14). Myofascial and intra-articular discomfort are frequent issues experienced by cyclists (15). The knee, neck/shoulder, hands, hip, and perineum are the body parts most commonly injured in non-traumatic cycling accidents (16),(17).

There is a lack of literature regarding the prevalence of non-traumatic or gradual onset injuries in recreational road cyclists, particularly in the Indian terrain. Although many studies have been conducted worldwide to investigate non-traumatic injuries in cyclists (1),(2),(3),(4), there are no studies on the Indian population that provide an overview of the effect of different types of bikes on post-ride pain in riders. Furthermore, the present study highlights the gap in knowledge regarding the physiotherapy measures adopted by cyclists to prevent or treat these gradual onset non-traumatic injuries. The aim of this study was to understand which bike design can lead to more post-ride pain and to identify prevalent physiotherapeutic measures among Indian cyclists.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted on 120 cyclists from three different cycling groups in Gurugram, Haryana, India. The survey responses were collected from August 2022 to September 2022. Both male and female riders between the ages of 20 and 60 years were included in the study.

Inclusion criteria: Riders who had been regularly cycling with their respective groups for a minimum of one year, riding at least four days a week for a minimum of two hours a day, were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Riders who were not willing to participate and those who were unable to read and write in English were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

Convenience sampling was used to select participants. In Gurugram, there were approximately less than 1000 riders, out of which around 150 were regular riders meeting the study’s inclusion criteria. A total of 120 regular cyclists responded to the survey. Data compilation, statistical analysis, and report writing were completed within two months, by November 2022. The questionnaire consisted of four sections with a total of 14 questions. Six questions were open-ended, and eight questions were multiple-choice questions. The first section collected sociodemographic data, the second section focused on the type of bike used, distance and speed of the cyclist. The third section included questions about post-ride pain (excluding trauma) and body type, categorised as endomorph (short stature with a wide frame and higher BMI), ectomorph (tall and slim), and mesomorph (strong and solid, neither underweight nor overweight). Participants were asked to select the most painful area from multiple options in the last six months. The fourth section explored the treatment strategies chosen for pain management, as shown in (Table/Fig 1). The questionnaire was self-structured, and a pilot test was conducted on 50 cyclists to assess reliability and validity. The Cronbach’s α-value was 0.700, indicated acceptable internal consistency with a reasonable degree of correlation between different items of the questionnaire. The questionnaire was prepared in English. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist was followed for this cross-sectional study (18). Data collection was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The responses from these cyclists highlight a gap in incorporating physiotherapy into their regular fitness routines for managing pain and injuries.

Statistical Analysis

The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24.0 was used for statistical analysis with a significance level set at 5% (p=0.05). Variables were analysed based on percentages. The independent t-test was used for quantitative data analysis. The Kruskal-Wallis test and Chi-square test were employed to analyse non-parametric data and determine any statistically significant differences among the three types of bikes used.

Results

The mean age of the study participants was 39.36±11.88 years. The average speed and distance covered in one ride were 22.52±4.73 km/hour and 43.50±15.32 km, respectively, as shown in (Table/Fig 2). Speed distribution of speed across the population ranged from 7.64 km/hr to 38.36 km/hr. Approximately 99% of cyclists in Gurugram covered distances on their bikes ranging from 9.12 km to 62.8 km in one day. The survey indicated that 78.33% of the total sample population were male riders, while 21.7% were female riders, as shown in (Table/Fig 3). Among the participants, 65% reported experiencing pain in some part of their body after recreational rides, while 35% of regular cyclists did not experience any pain. Out of the 65% who suffered from pain, 31.6% did not take any measures to alleviate it. Only 19.16% opted for rest to overcome the pain, while 21.66% engaged in muscle stretching during warm-up and cool-down periods or if they felt pain in a specific muscle. Additionally, 9.16% of cyclists used exercise as a means to relieve pain, while 3.33% used cycling gloves for wrist and hand pains. A small percentage (1.66%) of the population tried various approaches, including massage with oil, supplements, changing their bike, refitting their bike, icing, and dry needling. Among the cyclists who reported pain, 33.33% described it as diffuse, while 30.8% experienced numbness and heaviness in the affected body part.

According to the current study, there was no statistically significant difference in the distances covered, but there was a significant difference in the speeds traveled by male and female riders, with higher mean values observed in male riders, as shown in (Table/Fig 4). The average speeds of the three types of bikes showed a statistically significant difference. Although more distance was covered by road cyclists compared to hybrid and mountain bikers, this difference could not be proven statistically (Table/Fig 5). A statistically significant association between the types of bikes used and pain status (p<0.05), with pain being more prevalent among hybrid bikers compared to mountain and road cyclists, as shown in (Table/Fig 6).

Discussion

The present study was conducted on 120 cyclists from Gurugram, India, to understand the impact of different types of bicycles on the pain experienced by cyclists and to determine the commonly adopted physiotherapeutic measures among Indian cyclists. This study is the first of its kind and one of the few conducted within the Indian context specifically for the cyclist community.

According to the information collected and analysed from the survey, the average age of the cyclists was 39.36 years, and the average speed was 22.51 km/hr. The speed distribution across the population ranged from 7.64 km/hr to 38.36 km/hr. A study conducted in Sweden in 2019 analysed the average speed of cyclists, which varied between 12.5 and 26.5 km/hr (19). The present study reflects a similar scenario in terms of speed.

The data collected from the 120 cyclists in Gurugram revealed that the average distance covered in one day was 43.5 km. Evidence on cycling behavior has been analysed by Goel R et al., through surveys across 17 countries on six continents from 2009 to 2019, and it was found that the majority of cyclists fall into the category of covering 0-5 km distance per day (20). However, in the present study, 99% of the cyclists covered distances ranging from 9.12 km to 62.8 km in one day. Literature highlights that Germany, Japan, and the Netherlands are nations that enable greater distances in cycling, along with good representation in terms of gender and age among cyclists (20). It has been estimated that 46.7% of riders choose road bikes, 30% choose hybrid bikes, and only 21.7% opt for mountain bikes.

The present survey indicates that the most commonly affected areas after cycling in recreational cyclists are the wrists (35.8%) and legs (21.6%), followed by the neck and back (13.3% each). Approximately 6% of cyclists complain of headaches and pain in the hip, ankle, and shoulder. Mosimann R et al., suggested that hypertrophy of the psoas muscle leads to the bending of the external iliac artery, which can eventually cause claudication (21).

It is evident from the analysis that the common practices to relieve pain among cyclists are either to do nothing or simply rest. Stretching and exercises are also prevalent practices among cyclists. In 2002, Farrell KC et al., analysed foot pedal force, knee flexion angle, and crank angle and found them to be related to the cause of Iliotibial Band Friction Syndrome (ITBFS) (22). Repeated knee flexion in the impingement zone during cycling is a major contributor to ITBFS and knee pain. The present study suggests that a very small population utilises oil massage, icing, TENS, pain relieving sprays or ointments, supplements, or changes their bike or fitting in order to reduce pain. Only 3% of cyclists use dry needling as a pain relieving technique. The survey highlights the need to educate cyclists about the various options available for physiotherapy treatments to alleviate post-cycling pain. Some of these treatments can be done weekly, once every 10 days, or fortnightly.

Battista S et al., reported that 47.3% of cyclists suffer from lower back pain, and only 35.8% of cyclists use pain relief medications, with Non-Steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) being the most popular choice (23). This is consistent with a study by Outram and Stewart, which found that amateur cyclists commonly use NSAIDs and caffeine to manage pain (24). Muscle energy techniques, positional release techniques, nerve mobilisation, myofascial release, and cupping therapy are some effective techniques used in physiotherapy, which can benefit contemporary recreational cyclists.

It was observed that males cover a greater distance, around 43.4 km, compared to female cyclists who cover an average of 42.6 km in one day. However, there is a significant difference in average speeds between males and females, with males having a higher average speed by 5 km/hr. A cluster analysis done on cyclists in Europe revealed that 50% of female riders had a mean age of 43 years, of whom 67% were employed (25). Despite the low infrastructure and poor policies for road users in India, the present study indicates a good proportion of female riders. There is a statistically significant difference in average speed and pain status among the three types of bikes available: road bikes, mountain bikes, and hybrids. Road bikes offer the highest speed, and there is no significant difference in the distance covered. A statistically significant association between the types of bikes used and pain status was observed, with hybrid bikers experiencing more pain compared to mountain and road cyclists. This finding is consistent with a previous study conducted in 2022, which showed that mountain bikes do not significantly contribute to lower extremity pain (26). Further research comparing the effectiveness of various physiotherapy treatments is recommended.

Limitation(s)

A larger geographical area would have done more justice to the population. Further research is warranted to understand cyclists’ response to different physiotherapy strategies and their effect on their performance.

Conclusion

Among the different kinds of bikes, hybrid users complain more about pain post-ride, while mountain bike users complain the least. There is a lack of awareness among the young cyclist group regarding the available contemporary physiotherapy measures, which can not only effectively alleviate pain but also improve their performance. The information from the present study can therefore be used as a reference to infer which kind of cycle a cyclist should use depending on his or her purpose.

References

1.
Götschi T, Garrard J, Giles-Corti B. Cycling as a part of daily life: A review of health perspectives. Transp Rev. 2016;36(1):45-71. [crossref]
2.
Streisfeld GM, Bartoszek C, Creran E, Inge B, McShane MD, Johnston T. Relationship between body positioning, muscle activity, and spinal kinematics in cyclists with and without low back pain: A systematic review. Sports Health. 2017;9(1):75-79. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Jeukendrup AE, Craig NP, Hawley JA. The bioenergetics of world class cycling. J Sci Med Sport. 2000;3(4):414-33. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Rivara FP, Tliompson DC, Tlwmpson RS, Rebolledo V. Injuries involving off-road cycling. J Fam Pract. 1997;44(5):481-85.
5.
Selbst SM, Alexander D, Ruddy R. Bicycle-Related Injuries. Am J Dis Child. 1987;141(2):140-44. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Bury K, Leavy JE, Lan C, O’Connor A, Jancey J. A saddle sores among female competitive cyclists: A systematic scoping review. J Sci Med Sport [Internet]. 2021;24(4):357-67. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams. 2020.10.006. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Winston FK, Shaw KN, Kreshak AA, Schwarz DF, Gallagher PR, Cnaan A. Hidden spears: Handlebars as injury hazards to children. Pediatrics. 1998;102(3Pt 1):596-601. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Mellion MB. Common cycling injuries. Sport Med. 1991;11(1):52-70. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Van der walt A. Non-traumatic injury profile of amateur cyclists. South African J Sport Med. 2014;26(4):119-22.[crossref]
10.
Salai M, Brosh T, Blankstein A, Oran A, Chechik A. Effect of changing the saddle angle on the incidence of low back pain in recreational bicyclists. Br J Sports Med. 1999;33(6):398-400. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Scoz RD, Amorim CF, Espindola T, Santiago M, Mendes JJB, De Oliveira PR, et al. Discomfort, pain and fatigue levels of 160 cyclists after a kinematic bike-fitting method: An experimental study. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2021;7(3):01-07. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Hankey GJ, Gubbay SS. Compressive mononeuropathy of the deep palmar branch of the ulnar nerve in cyclists. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988;51(12):1588-90. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Barrios C, Sala D, Terrados N, Valenti JR. Traumatic and overuse injuries in elite professional cyclists. Sport Excercise Inj. 1997;3(4):176-79.
14.
Scoz RD, de Oliveira PR, Santos CS, Pinto JR, Melo-Silva CA, de Júdice AFT, et al. Long-term effects of a kinematic bikefitting method on pain, comfort, and fatigue: A prospective cohort study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(19):12949. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Wadsworth DJS, Weinrauch P. The role of a bike fit in cyclists with hip pain. A clinical commentary. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2019;14(3):468-86. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Ricchiuti VS, Haas CA, Seftel AD, Chelimsky T, Goldstein I. Pudendal nerve injury associated with avid bicycling. J Urol. 1999;162(6):2099-100. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Lebec MT, Cook K, Baumgartel D. Overuse injuries associated with mountain biking: Is single-speed riding a predisposing factor? Sports. 2014;2(1):01-13. [crossref]
18.
Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med. 2007;4(10):1623-27. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Eriksson J, Forsman A, Niska A, Gustafsson S, Sörensen G. An analysis of cyclists’ speed at combined pedestrian and cycle paths. Traffic Injury Prevention. 2019;20(3):56-61. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Goel R, Goodman A, Aldred R, Nakamura R, Tatah L, Garcia LMT, et al. Cycling behaviour in 17 countries across 6 continents: levels of cycling, who cycles, for what purpose, and how far? Transp Rev [Internet]. 2022;42(1):58-81. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1915898. [crossref]
21.
Mosimann R, Walder J, Van Melle G. Stenotic intimal thickening of the external iliac artery: Illness of the competition cyclists? Vascular Surgery. 1985;19(4):258-63. [crossref]
22.
Farrell KC, Reisinger KD, Tillman MD. Force and repetition in cycling: Possible implications for iliotibial band friction syndrome. Knee [Internet]. 2003;10(1):103-09. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Battista S, Sansone LG, Testa M. Prevalence, characteristics, association factors of and management strategies for low back pain among italian amateur cyclists: An observational cross-sectional study. Sport Med-Open [Internet]. 2021;7(1):78. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Outram SM, Stewart B. Condemning and condoning: Elite amateur cyclists’ perspectives on drug use and professional cycling. International Journal of Drug Policy. 2015;26(7):682-87. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Fraboni F, Prati G, Casu G, De Angelis M, Pietrantoni L. A cluster analysis of cyclists in Europe: common patterns, behaviours, and attitudes. Transportation (Amst) [Internet]. 2022;49(2):591-620. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11116-021-10187-3. [crossref]
26.
Alexander DA, Indraswari DA, Adji RMS, Widodo S. Association between mountain bike and folding bicycle usage with lower extremity pain. Diponegoro Med J (Jurnal Kedokt Diponegoro). 2022;11(4):212-16.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/64151.18314

Date of Submission: Mar 19, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Apr 25, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jul 03, 2023
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 22, 2023
• Manual Googling: May 26, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jun 30, 2023 (3%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com