Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 44437

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : August | Volume : 17 | Issue : 8 | Page : SC16 - SC19 Full Version

Clinical Spectrum of Neonatal Encephalopathy and the Role of CK-MB Assay in Transient Myocardial Ischaemia in Neonates with Hypoxic Ischaemic Encephalopathy: A Prospective Cohort Study


Published: August 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/41407.18363
MK Senthil Kumar, Nallamuthu Soundararajan, Muthukumar Geethanjali

1. Senior Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Government KAPV Medical College, Trichy, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Senior Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Government KAPV Medical College, Trichy, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Professor and Head, Department of Paediatrics, Government Medical College, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
MK Senthil Kumar,
Plot No-20, Superindent Garden, Airport Post, Trichy-620007, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: dryemkay@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Significant advancements have been made in the field of perinatal medicine through the use of newer monitoring technologies. However, birth asphyxia continues to cause prolonged hospitalisation due to multiple organ dysfunction and unfortunately, sometimes results in death. An elevation of the serum Creatine Kinase Myocardial Bound (CK-MB) fraction in myocardial ischaemia could indicate exposure to asphyxia and shock in neonates.

Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the clinical spectrum of Neonatal Encephalopathy (NE) and investigate Transient Myocardial Ischaemia (TMI) in neonates with Hypoxic Ischaemic Encephalopathy (HIE) using CK-MB assay at birth, 24 hours, and 72 hours.

Materials and Methods: A prospective clinical study was conducted in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Tamil Nadu, India. The study duration was eight months, from January 2014 to August 2014. A total of 70 term neonates admitted with NE symptoms were included. Among them, 65 babies with evidence of asphyxia, such as an Appearance, Pulse, Grimace,Activity and respiration (APGAR) score less than 3 at five minutes, heart rate less than 60 Beats Per Minute (bpm), meconium-stained amniotic fluid, or the need for positive pressure ventilation for more than one minute, were evaluated for TMI. Myocardial involvement was assessed through clinical evaluation, chest X-ray (CXR), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Echocardiography (ECHO), and CK-MB assay at birth, 24 hours, and 72 hours. Statistical analysis was performed using Epi Info software version 7.0.

Results: The mean Gestational Age (GA) of the study participants was 38.97±1.31 weeks. During the study period, 70 babies were admitted with NE symptoms, and HIE was the cause of encephalopathy in 65 babies. Other causes included hypoglycaemia, intraventricular haemorrhage, and bilirubin encephalopathy. Meconium staining of amniotic fluid was the most common intrapartum event in HIE babies. The survival rate in encephalopathy cases was 28.57%. Shock and respiratory failure were common complications in HIE, representing 46.15% and 44.61% respectively. Cardiomegaly in CXR, ST depression in ECG, Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR) in ECHO, and elevated CK-MB were commonly detected in babies with TMI associated with HIE.

Conclusion: NE caused by HIE has a high mortality and morbidity rate. 83.3% of asphyxiated babies with shock had elevated CK-MB levels at birth, but the CK-MB values at 24 hours and 72 hours were not significantly elevated.

Keywords

Birth asphyxia, Ischaemic markers, Neonatal echocardiography, Serum creatine kinase myocardial bound

Neonatal encephalopathy is a clinical term that describes an abnormal neurobehavioral state consisting of an altered level of consciousness. It does not imply a specific aetiology. HIE describes encephalopathy with objective data to support hypoxic ischaemia as the underlying cause (1). The National Neonatal-Perinatal database defines perinatal asphyxia as “slow gasping breathing or an APGAR score of 4-6 as moderate asphyxia, whereas the absence of breathing or an APGAR score of 0-3 at one minute as severe asphyxia” (2). According to the National Neonatology Forum of India (NNF), asphyxia is defined as “gasping respiration or ineffective breathing efforts or absence of breathing at one minute of life” (2).

The frequency of perinatal asphyxia is approximately 1.5% of live births in developed countries with advanced obstetric or neonatal care. Perinatal asphyxia accounts for 20% of perinatal deaths (50% if stillbirths are included). The incidence of perinatal asphyxia is estimated to be 10 to 15 times higher in low to middle-income countries (1). Prolonged total or partial asphyxia commonly results in decreased ventricular contractility and declining cardiac output. In addition to biochemical and radiological evidence of TMI, there is also noted contractile dysfunction of the heart (3),(4),(5). In cases of TMI, the neonate may exhibit tachycardia, a murmur indicating tricuspid valve insufficiency, congestive cardiac failure, and, in severe cases, cardiogenic shock (6). Due to the decline in cardiac function, the child may develop hypotension following asphyxia (7). The neonatal heart obtains glucose through glycogenolysis from its own glycogen storage. Experimental data suggests that, because of this characteristic, the immature heart has the capability to recover from short periods of ischaemia compared to the adult heart (8). The ECG may show ST depression in the mid precordium and T-wave inversion in the left precordium. Tricuspid insufficiency is functional and secondary to acute cardiac dilation. Echocardiographic findings most commonly include decreased left ventricular contractility, elevated ventricular end-diastolic pressures, Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR) (due to papillary muscle ischaemia), and pulmonary hypertension. In severe asphyxia, dysfunction more commonly affects the right ventricle (1).

Creatine Phosphokinase (CPK) or Creatine Kinase (CK) is an enzyme expressed in many cell types. CK-MB, the muscle-brain isoenzyme, is primarily present in cardiac muscle and in small quantities in skeletal muscle. There are several reports stating that levels of CK-MB are significantly elevated in babies who had birth asphyxia compared to those who did not (9),(10). Gunes T et al., published data on CK-MB and echocardiography. Babies with severe asphyxia had significantly elevated CK-MB values in the first two to four hours compared to healthy babies and babies with mild asphyxia (10). The CK-MB values on the third day showed no difference, and the echocardiography performed on the first day of life showed involvement in 80% of severely asphyxiated babies. However, echocardiography taken on day seven and day 15 showed normal results in all babies. Boo Y et al., found that levels of CK-MB in asphyxiated infants peaked significantly at 12 hours of life before returning to a low level at 48 hours of life (11). However, studies with serial measurements of CK-MB values in the first three days are lacking. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the clinical spectrum of NE and TMI in neonates with HIE using CK-MB assay at birth, 24 hours, and 72 hours.

Material and Methods

A prospective clinical study was conducted in the NICU at a Tertiary Care referral Hospital in Tamil Nadu, India. The study duration was eight months, from January 2014 to August 2014. Ethical clearance for the study was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Committee (Ref. No. 491/PAED/2013/41).

Inclusion criteria: All neonates with features of NE were included to describe the clinical spectrum. Babies with evidence of asphyxia, such as a five-minute APGAR score less than 3, heart rate less than 60 bpm, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, or the need for positive pressure ventilation for more than one minute, were included in the study (1).

Exclusion criteria: Neonates with congenital malformations and mothers who had received magnesium sulphate injection within four hours prior to delivery or received opioids were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: The calculated sample size was 60, using the formula:

n=z2p(1-p)/d2,

where n is the sample size, ‘z’ is 1.96 for a 95% confidence level, ‘p’ is the prevalence, and ‘d’ is the degree of error, based on a previous study by Agarwal J et al., (2012) (12) where CK-MB was raised in 86.6% of asphyxiated babies (with an allowable error of 10%).

Study Procedure

All included neonates were clinically evaluated and underwent CXR, biochemical analysis for CK-MB, microbiological analysis, and neurosonogram to determine the cause of encephalopathy. The outcome of each neonate was recorded as discharged or expired. Term neonates who had suffered perinatal asphyxia and developed HIE were enrolled for the evaluation of TMI. Myocardial involvement was assessed through clinical evaluation, CXR, ECG, ECHO, and CK-MB assay at birth, 24 hours, and 72 hours. Written consent was obtained from parents, and data regarding detailed maternal history, details of meconium staining of amniotic fluid, birth events, APGAR score, gender, and weight of the baby were recorded. The gestational age of the baby was assessed using the New Ballard scoring system (13). Treatment was provided according to the existing institutional protocol. Neonatal hypotension or shock was defined as a mean arterial pressure less than 30 mmHg or a low Blood Pressure (BP) value accompanied by clinically detectable evidence of circulatory compromise, such as poor peripheral perfusion or decreased urine output (14). Perfusion Index (PI) using pulsoximetry and BP were measured to detect the presence of shock. Serum CK-MB assay was performed at birth, 24 hours, and 72 hours. ECG and CXR were taken to assess cardiac dysfunction. Echocardiography was performed in 18 babies based on the newborn’s transportability to the Department of Cardiology.

Statistical Analysis

Data was entered into an Excel spreadsheet and analysed using Epi Info software version 7.0. Frequencies, percentages, means, and Standard Deviation (SD) were calculated using this software. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The mean gestational age of the newborn babies was 38.97±1.31 weeks. Among the 70 cases of NE, there were 35 males and 35 females. Forty (57.14%) Babies were born in the hospital of study (inborn) and 30 (42.85%) babies were born in other hospital and referred here (outborn). Natural labor was the most common mode of delivery, while breech and vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery were the least common methods (Table/Fig 1).

Among the 70 babies with NE, 65 (92.8%) had HIE. Hypoglycemia and bilirubin encephalopathy accounted for 2 (2.8%) cases each, followed by intraventricular haemorrhage which accounted for only 1 (1.4%) case (Table/Fig 2). Meconium Staining of the Amniotic Fluid (MSAF) was the most common intrapartum event, while 12 (18.46%) babies had no adverse intrapartum events (Table/Fig 3). ECG positive findings were only seen in 20 (30.76%) asphyxiated newborns. Using echocardiography, 12 (66.67%) babies were reported to have a normal heart without any structural or functional abnormalities, as determined by the cardiologist.

One baby had both Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR) and decreased left ventricular contractility. Three babies had TR alone, and two other babies had decreased left ventricular contractility alone. Blood culture analysis showed growth in 8 (12.31%) babies, with Staphylococcus aureus being the most common organism grown in 3 (4.61%) cases (Table/Fig 4).

In the present study, the mean CK-MB value was lowest at birth, increased to a maximum after 24 hours, and then decreased after 72 hours. The sensitivity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of CK-MB were highest at birth (Table/Fig 5). In the present study, 30 (83.33%) babies with shock had significantly elevated CK-MB values at birth, with a p-value <0.001. Only 7 (25%) of the HIE babies with shock had elevated CK-MB at 24 hours (p-value >0.05). Likewise, only 4 (50%) of the HIE babies with shock had elevated CK-MB at 72 hours (p-value >0.05) (Table/Fig 6).

Among the 65 babies with HIE, 29 (44.61%) babies had respiratory failure, 28 (43.07%) babies had shock alone, 6 (9.23%) babies had sepsis alone, and 2 (3.07%) babies had both sepsis and shock, along with acute kidney injury. In the present study, the survival rate among babies affected by NE and HIE in the neonatal unit during testthe study period was 28.57% and 24.61%, respectively. Shock and respiratory failure were the two major complications in HIE cases, present in 30 (46.15%) and 29 (44.61%) babies, respectively. While respiratory failure caused death in 24 (82.75%) babies with severe respiratory distress, cardiac dysfunction caused death in 17 babies (56.66%) with shock. Sepsis complicated with Neonatal Necrotising Enterocolitis (NNEC) and Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) increased the mortality rate (Table/Fig 7).

Discussion

The higher percentage of inborn newborns accounting for NE may be due to the presence of maternal risk factors, leading to referrals to a tertiary institute before or during labor. MSAF occurred in 40 (61.53%) neonates with HIE in the present study, while a study by Mundhra R and Agarwal M reported MSAF in only 12-16% of deliveries (15). Another study by Reddy S et al., reported MSAF in only 8% of deliveries (16). The difference can be attributed to differences in inclusion criteria.

TR and left ventricular dysfunction were the most common findings in the echocardiography of asphyxiated babies, consistent with studies by Ranjit MS, Omokhodion SI, and Losekoot TG (17),(18). These studies examined CK and CK-MB activities in perinatally asphyxiated newborns and healthy controls during the first 100 hours of life. The babies with asphyxia had significantly raised mean CK and absolute CK-MB values. Fractional CK-MB values did not show such a rise in asphyxiated babies, but healthy controls showed a steady decline in the activities of these enzymes from birth (18).

The mean CK-MB value at birth in the present study was 13.14 U/L (±12.03). In a study by Omokhodion SI and Losekoot TG, the mean value was 16.36 (±3.0) in the immediate postpartum period (18). Higher values of 176.1±243 and 121±77.4 were obtained in studies by Reddy S and Dutta S, and Rajakumar PS et al., respectively (16),(19). A comparison of the diagnostic performance of CPK-MB in various studies is shown in (Table/Fig 8) (9),(16),(19),(20). In a study by Heba A et al., in Egypt, the sensitivity and specificity of CK-MB were 99% and 97.5%, respectively (9). However, Sachin C et al., from Nepal reported a sensitivity of 18.06% and specificity of 100% for samples collected at birth (20). In the present study, the corresponding values were 86% and 80%. Sensitivity and specificity for CK-MB at 24 hours analysis in a study by Reddy S and Dutta S were 36% and 100%, respectively. In the present study, the corresponding values were 37% and 38%.

In the present study, shock (46.15%) and respiratory failure (44.16%) were the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in HIE-affected babies. A study by Reddy S and Dutta S reported cardiogenic shock in only 16% of cases (16), while Rajakumar PS et al., reported congestive heart failure in 36.7% of cases and respiratory failure in 66.7% of cases (19). In the present study, out of the 65 HIE babies admitted, 49 expired (75.4%). In the study by Rajakumar PS et al., only 16% of babies expired (19). The high mortality in the present study can be attributed to differences in inclusion criteria. Respiratory failure caused death in 82.75% of newborns with severe respiratory distress, while cardiac dysfunction resulted in only 56% of cases. This can be attributed to the transient nature of myocardial ischaemia. Early detection and prompt initiation of treatment can help improve the prognosis of these asphyxiated newborns.

Limitation(s)

Echocardiography is considered the gold standard test for assessing myocardial dysfunction, but it was not performed in all HIE babies for the evaluation of TMI due to the difficulty in mobilising sick/ ventilated babies.

Conclusion

In the present study, HIE accounted for the majority of cases of NE. The NE caused by HIE is associated with high mortality and morbidity rates. The case fatality rates for HIE due to shock, respiratory failure, and sepsis are 56.66%, 82.75%, and 100%, respectively. Approximately 83.3% of asphyxiated babies with shock had elevated CK-MB levels at birth. However, the CK-MB values at 24 hours and 72 hours were not significantly elevated. Further studies comparing CK-MB values with point-of-care echocardiography by neonatologists or intensivists would be preferred.

References

1.
Anne RH, Janet S. Cloherty and Stark’s Manual of neonatal care. Perinatal asphyxia and Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy. 8th edn. Wolters Kluwer; New Delhi: 2021. Pp. 820-841.
2.
NNPD network. National Neonatal Perinatal Database- report for the year 2002- 2003. NNF NNPD network. New Delhi: 2005.
3.
Trevisanuto D, Lachin M, Zaninotto M, Pellegrino PA, Plebani M, Cantarutti F, et al. Cardiac troponin T in newborn infants with transient myocardial ischemia. Biology of the Neonate. 1998;73(3):161-65. https://doi.org/10.1159/000013973. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Oh KS, Bender TM, Bowen A, Godine L. Transient myocardial ischemia of the newborn infant. Pediatric Radiology. 1985;15:29-33. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Turner-Gomes SO, Izukawa Y, Rowe RD. Persistence of AV valve regurgitation and electrocardiographic abnormalities in transient myocardial ischemia of newborn. Pediatric Cardiology. 1989;10(4):191-94. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Goodwin TM, Belai I, Hernandez P. Asphyxial complications in term newborn. Am J Obstet Gyanecol. 1992;167:1506-12. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Aaltonen M, Soukka H, Halkola L. Asphyxia aggravates systemic hypotension but not pulmonary hypertension in piglets with meconium aspiration. Pediatr Res. 2003;53:473-78. https://doi.org/10.1203/01.PDR.0000049514.02607.03. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Julia PL, Kofsky ER, Young HH. Studies of myocardial protection in immature heart. J Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 1990;100:879-87. [crossref]
9.
Heba A, Naglaa AK, Miftah HL, Sahar AE. Role of creatine kinase mb in diagnosis of myocardial injury after neonatal hypoxia-ischemia. The Egypt J Hospital Medicine. 2021;85(2):3498-502. [crossref]
10.
Gunes T, Ozturk MA, Koklu SM, Narin N, Koklu E. Troponin-T levels in perinatally asphyxiated infants during the first 15 days of life. Acta Paediatr. 2005;94(11):1638-43. Doi: 10.1080/08035250510041222. PMID: 16303703. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Boo Y, Hafidz H, Nawawi M. Comparison of serum cardiac troponin T and creatine kinase MB isoenzyme mass concentrations in asphyxiated term infants during the first 48 h of life. J Paediatr Child Health. 2005;41(7):331-37. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Agrawal J, Shah GS, Poudel P, Baral N, Agrawal A, Mishra OP. Electrocardiographic and enzymatic correlations with outcome in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Ital J Pediatr. 2012;38:33. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Ballard JL, Khoury JC, Wedig K, Wang L, Eilers-Walsman BL, Lipp R. New Ballard Score, expanded to include extremely premature infants. J Pediatr. 1991;119(3):417-23. Doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)82056-6. PMID: 1880657. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Amir MK, Cloherty and Stark’s Manual of neonatal care. Shock. 8 th edn. Wolters Kluwer; New Delhi: 2021.Pp. 523-33.
15.
Mundhra R, Agarwal M. featal outcome in meconium stained deliveries. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(12):287410. 7860/JCDR/2013/6509.3781.
16.
Reddy S, Dutta S. Creatine kinase and hepatic enzymes for the retrospective diagnosis of perinatal asphyxia among sick neonates. Indian Pediatrics. 2008;45:144-47.
17.
Ranjit MS. Cardiac abnormalities in birth asphyxia. Indian J Pediatr. 2000;67(3 Suppl):S26-29. PMID: 11129917. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Omokhodion SI, Losekoot TG. Serum cratine kinase and creatine kinase- MB isoenzyme activities in perinatally asphyxiated newborns. Eur Heart J. 1991;12(9):980-84.
19.
Rajakumar PS, Vishnu B, Sidharth MG, Balachander J, Konark BC, Narayana P, et al. Cardiac enzyme levels in myocardial dysfunction in newborns with perinatal asphyxia. Ind J Pediatr. 2008;75:1223-25. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Sachin C, Rupa RS, Nisha KB. Lactate dehydrogenase and CK-MB as predictors of hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy in newborns with perinatal asphyxia. MedPulse International J Pediatr. 2019;11(2):58-64. http://medpulse. in/Pediatrics/index.php.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/41407.18363

Date of Submission: Jan 15, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Feb 03, 2023
Date of Acceptance: May 18, 2023
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 16, 2023
• Manual Googling: Mar 15, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Apr 26, 2023 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com