Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 49823

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : August | Volume : 17 | Issue : 8 | Page : SC01 - SC05 Full Version

Prevalence of Double Burden of Malnutrition among Young Children in Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: August 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/61505.18261
Aakriti Jasrotia, Vartika Saxena, Yogesh Bahrupi

1. Tutor, Department of Community and Family Medicine, AIIMS, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India. 2. Head, Department of Community and Family Medicine and Ayush, AIIMS, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Community and Family Medicine, AIIMS, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.

Correspondence Address :
Vartika Saxena,
Swami Ram Nagar, Beside Jolly Grant Airport, Jolly Grant, Doiwala-248016, Uttarakhand, India.
E-mail: Vartika.cfm@aiimsrishikesh.edu.in

Abstract

Introduction: The Double Burden of Malnutrition (DBM), which refers to the coexistence of obesity and stunting in children, is a newly emerging form of malnutrition and a significant issue in developing countries, including India. Many of these countries are in the third stage of the epidemiological transition and undergoing rapid urbanisation, leading to increased availability of processed food, mechanisation of work, and sedentary lifestyles. These factors present a unique challenge in combating DBM. Due to the lack of evidence on DBM in India, particularly among young children, the current study was conducted.

Aim: The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of DBM among children under six years of age and identify its biosocial determinants.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Urban Anganwadi Centres of Tehsil Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India. The study spanned six months, from November 2021 to April 2022, and included a total of 310 children from 13 Anganwadi Centres. Data collection was performed using a validated and pretested semi-structured questionnaire through Epicollect 5.0. The collected data were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0. Pearson’s Chi-square test was employed to examine the association between various biosocial determinants (sociodemographic factors, Infant and Young Child Feeding practices, and screen time) and DBM.

Results: The study included 310 children under six years of age, among whom 11 (3.5%) exhibited DBM. The prevalence of DBM was higher in females, with 8 (5.2%) affected, compared to males, with 3 (2%) affected. Among the females, DBM was more prevalent in the age group of 2-5 years, with five cases. Six out of the 11 children with DBM belonged to the lower-middle class. Additionally, 7 (4%) of the DBM children were breastfed immediately, while 4 (3.5%) were breastfed after a few hours or days. The prevalence of DBM in urban areas of Rishikesh (3.5%) was higher than the national average of 2.8% reported in the Comprehensive National Nutrition Survey (CNNS) 2016-2018 report.

Conclusion: Although, the present study had a small sample size, it offers valuable insights and fills the data gap regarding the estimation of DBM at the individual level and the association of various factors in this specific age group. DBM was more prevalent in females compared to males, suggesting a gender-related disparity in the occurrence of DBM among young children. However, further research is needed to understand the underlying factors contributing to this difference and to develop targeted interventions.

Keywords

Comprehensive national nutrition survey, Coronavirus disease-2019, Feeding practices, Obesity, Stunting

The DBM faced by the world is a newly emergent form of malnutrition. It can be defined as “the coexistence of undernutrition along with overweight and obesity or diet-related non-communicable diseases within individuals, households, and populations, across the life course” (1),(2). Among these three levels of DBM, individual-level DBM is a more serious problem, which can be multifaceted. However, in most cases, the root cause for it is the intake of energy-dense food with excess calories and inadequate physical activity. DBM poses a serious and negative economic impact on families and populations. It hampers children’s growth and development, increases healthcare costs, slows economic growth, and perpetuates the cycle of poverty and ill health. The direct and indirect costs incurred by families significantly impede their ability to thrive economically and socially. The economic cost of malnutrition is also increasing as the burden of disease grows, becoming a significant public health challenge (3).

Many developing countries in the world are in the third stage of epidemiological transition due to rapid urbanisation and industrialisation. This has led to an increasing availability of highly processed, nutritionally deficient food, along with a decreased requirement for physical activity due to improved socioeconomic standards and access to modern gadgets, among other factors. The epidemiological and nutrition transition has resulted in an increased number of children who are obese and overweight, adding to the burden of malnutrition that already exists (4),(5). In 2020, the World Health Organisation (WHO) reported that roughly 39 million children under the age of five were either overweight or obese, while 149 million were stunted (6),(7). This situation has been further exacerbated by the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which has been linked to overnutrition in recent times (8). According to the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), approximately 6% of children under five are overweight, which equates to approximately 40 million children worldwide (9). Meanwhile, the prevalence of stunting continues to be high at 22% (10). Some globally conducted studies have revealed a range of DBM prevalence, ranging from 0.2% to 1.9% in low and middle-income countries (11), and less than 5% in Sub-Saharan Africa at the household level (12).

India bears the burden of DBM, with persistent undernutrition and a significant rise in overnutrition and non-communicable diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases. The latest National Family Health Survey (NFHS-V) conducted during 2019-2020 reported an increase in overweight among children under five years of age, from 2.1% to 3.4% (13). Obesity has also increased at an annual rate of 4.98% from 1990 to 2017 and is estimated to reach 17.5% by 2030 (14). On the contrary, the prevalence of stunted children has fallen by 2.9% to the current level of 35.5% (13). However, it is still high and far from reaching the sustainable development goal of reducing stunted children by 50% by 2030 (15). This situation of rising overweight and obesity coexisting with persistent high levels of stunting is resulting in an increasing prevalence of DBM.

In India, DBM has been reported to be 5.5% in 23 states and union territories (16), 33% in Delhi among mother-child dyads at the household level (17), and 55.6% among adolescent girls at the population level in Barabanki district of Uttar Pradesh (18). Additionally, India’s urban population is steadily increasing, with a current total urban population of 35.39% in 2020-2021 (19). This growing urban population faces numerous challenges, including overcrowding, lack of basic needs, substandard housing, reduced access to healthcare and clean water, and inadequate sanitation (20). City dwellers encounter a wide range of health and nutrition problems, and the coexistence of undernutrition and overweight/obesity is becoming a serious, slowly evolving public health issue.

Since very few studies have been conducted on DBM in the country to assess its prevalence at the individual level, and moreover, no data is available from any northern states of the country, the present research was conducted to explore the situation in Uttarakhand and assess the biosocial determinants of DBM.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Urban Anganwadi Centres of Tehsil Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India. The study duration was six months, from November 2021 to April 2022, and included children under six years of age. Data were collected after obtaining written informed consent from the parents/guardians of the selected children. The research was conducted with the approval of the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC NO: AIIMS/IEC/21/601).

Inclusion criteria: Children under six years of age whose parents/guardians provided written consent were included in the study.

Sample size calculation: The sample size was calculated based on the primary objective of the research, which was to estimate the prevalence of chronic malnutrition and its correlates in children under six years of age residing in urban areas of Rishikesh. The sample size was calculated using the prevalence of stunting reported by Rehan A et al., (2020) among children in Rishikesh under six years of age, which was 43.3%, with a relative precision of 8% and a design effect of 2 at a 95% confidence level (21). The calculated sample size was 292.

Formula: {DEFF*Np(1-p)}/{(d2/Z21- α/2*(N-1)+p*(1-p)}

Two-stage cluster random sampling was used to select the sample units.

Stage 1: There are 34 Anganwadi Centres in the urban Rishikesh area, and one-third of them, i.e., 11 centres, were planned to be included in the study by random sampling using the lottery method.

Stage 2: From each Anganwadi centre, 27 children were selected by simple random sampling using the lottery method. In a few Anganwadi centres, parents of the remaining children insisted on the inclusion of their children, hence the final sample size increased from the calculated sample size.

However, two randomly selected Anganwadi centres had a shortage of the required number of children, so their nearest AWCs were also included to complete the sample size. Finally, 310 children were included in the study.

Study Procedure

A pretested and validated semi-structured study tool was used, which included information on sociodemographic parameters such 2as age, socioeconomic status (modified Kuppuswamy Scale) (22), religion, caste, and type of family. It also included feeding methods (breastfeeding, complementary feeding, frequency of feeding, etc.) and parameters to assess the physical activity of the child (playing outdoor games, watching television).

Anthropometric assessments were conducted, including measuring each child’s height and weight. Length/height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using an IndoSurgicals Infantometer/Krups stadiometer following a standard protocol. Weight was measured using a bar weighing scale for children under two years of age and a calibrated Digital Samso weighing scale for children above two years of age, with measurements taken to the nearest 0.1 kg following a standard protocol.

Operational definitions:

• Stunting: A child was defined as stunted if their height/length-for-age was more than two standard deviations below the WHO child growth standards median (23).
• Overweight: A child up to five years of age was defined as overweight if their weight-for-height was greater than two standard deviations above the WHO child growth standards median. For children above five years, if their weight-for-height was greater than one standard deviation above the WHO child growth standards median (24).
• Obesity: A child up to five years of age was defined as obese if their weight-for-height was greater than three standard deviations above the WHO child growth standards median. For children above five years, if their weight-for-height was greater than two standard deviations above the WHO child growth standards median (24).

Double Burden of Malnutrition (DBM): For this study, DBM was considered as a child having height/length-for-age more than two standard deviations below the WHO child growth standards median and weight-for-height more than three standard deviations above for children below five years, and more than two standard deviations above for children above five years, as per the WHO child growth standards median.

Statistical Analysis

The data were collected using Epicollect 5.0 software and analysed using SPSS version 23.0. Descriptive statistics were calculated, including mean and standard deviation, median (interquartile range), and proportions and percentages for numerical and categorical variables, respectively. To determine the association between DBM and biosocial determinants (sociodemographic, IYCF, screen time), Pearson’s chi-square test was employed. In 2×2 tables, Fisher’s exact test was used whenever the expected frequency was less than one. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The study included 310 children under six years of age, with more male children (156, 50.3%) than female children (154, 49.7%). The prevalence of DBM was 11 (3.5%), while 71 (22.9%) children were stunted, and almost half of them (32, 10.3%) were overweight and obese. Out of the 11 DBM children, eight were females, and five of them were in the age group of 2-5 years. All 11 DBM children were Hindu by religion. Considering caste, 196 (63.22%) children were from the general category, while 92 (29.7%) were from backward caste, and 22 (7.1%) were Scheduled Castes (SC)/Scheduled Tribes (ST). Out of the 11 DBM children, eight were from the General category, while only three were from Other Backward Classes (OBC)/ST/SC. The present study included 145 (46.8%) children from nuclear families, 86 (27.7%) from joint families, and 79 (25.5%) from third-generation families. Six children from nuclear families were facing DBM (p-value=0.823).

A maximum of 204 (66.4%) participants belonged to the middle class of socioeconomic status in the study, and eight out of the 11 DBM cases were from this class, while three children were from the lower class. However, no cases of DBM were reported from the upper class (p-value >0.999) (Table/Fig 1),(Table/Fig 2).

Association of young child feeding practices with Double Burden of Malnutrition (DBM): The study analysed different IYCF practices like ever breastfed, initiation of breastfeeding, any prelacteal feeds, colostrum, exclusive breastfeeding for six months, frequency of breastfeeding, top feeding given, age of start of complimentary feeding/weaning, food eating frequency, and explored their association with DBM. Strikingly, DBM was more common among children who were ever breastfed (11, 3.8%), had immediate initiation of breastfeeding (7, 4.1%), were not given any prelacteal feeds (7, 4%), had colostrum at birth (9, 4.2%), exclusively breastfed for six months (8, 3.7%), and were breastfed on demand (5, 7%). DBM was also more common among children who were given top feed (4, 4%) and among those who started complementary feeding/weaning after the age of one year (1, 8.3%). However, DBM was not significantly associated with any of these feeding practices (Table/Fig 3).

Association of Screen Time with Double Burden of Malnutrition (DBM): The study examined the association between several screen variables and DBM. The results showed that DBM was more common among children who played video games on mobile (8, 3.8%) and children who played games or watched videos for less than one hour per day (6, 4.1%). DBM was also more common among children who often watched television (9, 5%) and those who watched television or used mobile devices while eating (7, 4.8%). However, DBM was not significantly associated with any factors of screen time (Table/Fig 4).

Discussion

Prevalence of DBM in this study was 3.5%, which is higher than the 2.8% reported in the CNNS 2016-2018 report (25). This variation may be attributed to sociodemographic differences among different geographical locations in India. As there is limited literature available providing evidence of DBM at the individual level for children under six years of age, an attempt was made to discuss the findings to obtain approximations for comparison. The prevalence of DBM was reported as 5.5% among preschool children in a study by Kukka A across 23 states and union territories (16). In a study by Lerm BR et al., the prevalence ranged from 0.2% to 10.9% at the individual level in 90 low- and middle-income countries, while Adeomi A et al., reported a prevalence of 4% at the individual level in two Nigerian states. Bates K et al., reported a prevalence ranging from 0.3% to 11.7% in 79 low- and middle-income countries (11),(12),(26),(27). In contrast to the current study, Shukla M et al., conducted a study among school-going adolescent girls in Uttar Pradesh and reported that 55.6% of girls had DBM (18). Another study conducted among 6-17 year-old school-going children in three districts of South India observed a population double burden prevalence of 39.7% (28). The variations in the study findings can be attributed to different study designs, settings, and interstate variations in geographical, sociodemographic, and sociocultural traits.

The child’s age was not significantly associated with DBM (p-value >0.999). A similar finding was reported by Adeomi A et al., where the double burden at the individual level was not significantly associated with age (p-value=0.309) (26). However, a study conducted by Oddo VM et al., reported that an age of more than 24 months was found to be significantly associated with DBM at the household level (p-value <0.001) (29). The variation in outcome findings is attributed to the study population and study type.

Religion and caste category were not found to be significantly associated with DBM. However, DBM was reported more in the General Caste category (8, 4%). A similar finding was reported by Panda BK et al., who reported a high risk of overnutrition among the General category. This may be attributed to inadequate IYCF practices, easy availability of packed food, and poor access to nutritious food (30).

In the present study, DBM cases were reported in the Hindu religion, which was contrary to a study conducted by Panda BK et al., where a higher risk of overnutrition was found among Muslims (30). The variation in the study findings may be attributed to cultural and dietary practices, rapid urbanisation, changing lifestyles, the study area, and sample size. Socioeconomic status was found not to be associated with DBM. A similar finding was reported in a study conducted by Adeomi A et al., in two Nigerian states (26). In contrast, a study of mothers and children in Cambodia reported that DBM at the household level was significantly associated with socioeconomic status (p-value <0.001) (30). The variation in the study findings may be due to the current study assessing DBM at the individual level, whereas the latter study assessed it at the household level. Child ever breastfed was not significantly associated with DBM, which was consistent with the findings of a study conducted by Oddo VM et al., which reported that breastfeeding was protective against mother-child DBM (29). This is one of the first research studies of its kind in the state of Uttarakhand and one of the few in the country that has analysed DBM in a community-based setting.

Limitation(s)

The study had a small sample size, and recall bias could have occurred for some of the questions regarding IYCF practices, such as the age of starting weaning/complementary feeding.

Conclusion

The prevalence of DBM in the study was 3.5%, which is higher compared to the national average of 2.8%, as reported in the CNNS 2016-2018 report. Further research is needed to assess DBM at the individual level, along with its risk factors, and to understand the underlying factors contributing to DBM, particularly in females. These efforts will help develop targeted interventions.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to express their gratitude to all the Anganwadi workers and parents of the children for their time and immense support.

References

1.
World Health Organisation. 2021. Nutrition [Internet]. Available from: https:// www.who.int/health-topics/nutrition [cited 28 December 2021].
2.
World Health Organisation. 2017. Double burden of malnutrition [online]. Available at: < http://www.who.int/nutrition/double-burden-malnutrition/en> [Accessed 8 May 2021].
3.
World Health Organisation. 2022. The double burden of malnutrition: Policy brief [Internet]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/nutrition/publications/double burden malnutrition-policybrief/en /index.html [accessed8 Sept 2022].
4.
Stranges S. Epidemiological and nutritional transition in low-and middle-income countries. European Journal of Public Health. 2019;29(Supplement_4):ckz185-99. [accessed2022 April 23]. [crossref]
5.
Dahn CM, Wijesekera O, Garcia GE, Karasek K, Jacquet GA. Acute care for the three leading causes of mortality in lower-middle-income countries: A systematic review. International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science. 2018;8(3):117. [accessed2022 April 23]. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
World Health Organisation. 2022. Obesity and overweight [Internet]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight. [Cited 27 May 2022].
7.
World Health Organisation. 2021. Malnutrition. [online] Available at: https://www. who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/malnutrition. [Accessed 8 May 2021].
8.
Grimes A, Lightner JS, Eighmy K, Steel C, Shook RP, Carlson J. Decreased physical activity among youth resulting from COVID-19 pandemic-related school closures: Natural experimental study. JMIR Formative Research. 2022;6(4):e35854. [Accessed 8 Sept 2022]. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
United Nations Children’s Fund 2022. Prevention of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents [Internet]. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/documents/prevention-overweight-and-obesity-children-and-adolescents. [Cited 27 May 2022].
10.
United Nations Children’s Fund. 2022 Malnutrition in Children-UNICEF DATA [Internet]. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/topic/nutrition/malnutrition/ [Cited 20 May 2022].
11.
Lerm BR, Crochemore-Silva I, Costa JC, Victora CG. The double burden of malnutrition in under-five children at national and individual levels: Observed and expected prevalence in ninety-three low-and middle-income countries. Public Health Nutrition. 2021;24(10):2944-51. [Accessed 2021 May 18]. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Wojcicki J. The double burden household in sub-Saharan Africa: Maternal overweight and obesity and childhood undernutrition from the year 2000: Results from World Health Organisation Data (WHO) and Demographic Health Surveys (DHS). BMC Public Health. BioMed Central Ltd.; 2014;14:01-12. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/1124. [Accessed 2021 May 18]. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
International Institute for Population Sciences. 2021. Fact sheet for key indicators India and states [Internet]. Available from: http://rchiips.org/nfhs/NFHS- 5_FCTS/India.pdf [cited 28 December 2021].
14.
Kaul R. Obesity in children on rise in India; problem has just begun, say experts [Internet]. Hindustan Times. 2022. Available from: https://main.icmr.nic.in/sites/ default/files/Release_IndiaStateLevelMalnutrtionPaper.pdf. [Cited 27 May 2022].
15.
United Nations Children’s Fund. 2022. Nutrition for every child UNICEF Nutrition strategy 2020-2030 [Internet]. Available from: https://www. unicef.org/ media/92031/file/UNICEF.pdf. [Cited 27 May 2022].
16.
Kukka A. Prevalence of double burden of malnutrition among indian pre-school children: An analysis of cross-sectional DLHS-4 data from 23 states. Diva-portal. org. 2018. Available from: https://uu.diva- portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1211930/ FULLTEXT01.pdf. [Cited 2021 Oct 4].
17.
Malik R, Puri S, Adhikari T. Double burden of malnutrition among mother-child DYADS in urban poor settings in India. Indian Journal of Community Health. 2018;30(2):13944. Available from: https://www.iapsmupuk.org/journal/index. php/ IJCH/article/view/856. [Accessed 2021 May 18]. [crossref]
18.
Shukla M, Ahmad S, Shukla N, Singh J, Shukla R. Double burden of malnutrition among school-going adolescent girls in North India: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2018;7(6):1417-24. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/jfmpc/Fulltext/2018/07060/Double_burden_of_ malnutrition_among_school_going.48.aspx. [Accessed 2021 May 18]. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
MacroTrends. India urban population1960-2023 [Internet]. Available from: https:// www.macrotrends.net/countries/IND/india/urban-population. [Cited 2023 Mar 26].
20.
Shrinivasan R. 17% of urban India lives in slums. Times of India [Internet]. 2013. Available from: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/17-of-urban-india- lives-in-slums- census/article show/19118219.cms. [Accessed 8 May 2021].
21.
Rehan A, Kishore S, Singh M, Jain B, Reddy NK, Kumar D, et al. A study to assess undernutrition and its sociodemographic correlates in under-five children in urban and rural areas of Rishikesh, Uttarakhand. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2020;9(9):4980. [Accessed 8 Sept 2022]. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Kumar G, Dash P, Patnaik J, Pany G. Socioeconomic status scale-Modified Kuppuswamy Scale for the year 2022. International Journal of Community Dentistry. 2022;10(1):01-06. [Accessed 8 May 2021]. [crossref]
23.
World Health Organisation. Stunting in a nutshell [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/19-11-2015-stunting-in-a-nutshell. [Accessed 16 July 2021].
24.
World Health Organisation. Obesity [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://www. who.int/health-topics/obesity. [Accessed 16 July 2021].
25.
United Nations Children’s Fund. 2022 Comprehensive National Nutritional Survey 2016-2018 [Internet]. Available from: https: //www.unicef.org/india /media/2646/ file/ CNNS-report.pdf. [Cited 27 May 2022].
26.
Adeomi A, Fatusi A, Klipstein-Grobusch K. Double burden of malnutrition among school-aged children and adolescents: Evidence from a community-based cross-sectional survey in two Nigerian States. Open Research Africa. 2021;4(38):38. [Cited 27 May 2022]. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Bates K, Gjonc¸a A, Leone T. Double burden or double counting of child malnutrition? The methodological and theoretical implications of stunting overweight in low and middle income countries. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017;71(8):779-85. [Cited 18 May 2022]. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Hombaiah C, Bilimale AS, Madhu B, Murthy MN. Ambivalence in distinguishing double burden of malnutrition among school children in three districts of south India. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. 2021;12:100805. [Accessed 2023 April 3]. [crossref]
29.
Oddo VM, Rah JH, Semba RD, Sun K, Akhter N, Sari M, et al. Predictors of maternal and child double burden of malnutrition in rural Indonesia and Bangladesh. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2012;95(4):951-58. [Accessed 2022 August 18]. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Panda BK, Mog M, Dhillon P. Double burden of malnutrition among adolescents in India: Evidence from large scale surveys. Demography India. 2021;50(1):85-98.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/61505.18261

Date of Submission: Nov 16, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Mar 15, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jun 10, 2023
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Dec 01, 2022
• Manual Googling: May 24, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jun 05, 2023 (14%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com