Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 52270

AbstractConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Reviews
Year : 2023 | Month : August | Volume : 17 | Issue : 8 | Page : OE01 - OE04 Full Version

A Narrative Review on Emergency Management of Poisoning


Published: August 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/62534.18279
Rajiv Ratan Singh, Pradeep Kumar Yadav, Sachin Kumar Tripathi

1. Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. 3. Research Scholar, Department of Anthropometry, Lucknow University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Pradeep Kumar Yadav,
647/37A/468, Sita Vihar Colony, Jankipuram Extension, Lucknow-226031, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: dctrprdp@gmail.com

Abstract

Poisoning cases are coming to the Emergency Department (ED) and cases are increasing day by day due to their easy and vast availability. Clinicians are frequently dealt with to manage critically ill poisoning patients. With the swing of prominence in managing poisoning from in-patient care to early decontamination and early stabilisation, ED physicians are playing a more dynamic role in the care of poisoned patients. The clinical effects encountered by them are dependent on numerous variables, such as the dose, the duration of exposure, the health history of the patient, to provide thorough supportive care, recognition of patients requiring treatment with a specific antidote, and to use the appropriate methods to restrict poison absorption or to increase its elimination, which is the foundation of management. If poisoning in the patient is documented early and appropriate compassionate care is commenced hastily, maximum of patients recover soon. This article is aimed to focus on the more specific issues of emergency management of the poisoned patient.

Keywords

Antidotes, Blood poisoning, Emergency medicine, Gastric lavage, Medico-legal aspects, Patient care

The management of addiction, drug overdoses, and unfavourable drug responses are some of the most crucial and dynamic issues that practitioners in the field of medical toxicology deal with daily. In India, abuse of both legal and illegal substances is still prevalent (1). Because of how quickly drugs are approved, their full toxicity is frequently not understood until they have been used, or in the post-marketing era. The frequency of poisoning in humans is difficult to estimate. Information on drug abuse and overdose is available from a variety of sites (2). The American Association of Poison Control Centers (AAPCC) operates the National Poison Data System (NPDS), which includes the Toxin Exposure Surveillance System (TESS). TESS is a surveillance system that tracks and analyses cases of potentially harmful exposures to toxins, including medications, chemicals, and other substances (3). The information gathered by TESS can be used to identify trends and patterns in toxic exposures and to develop interventions and educational programmes to prevent future poisonings. The data is also used to inform the public about health policy decisions and to respond to public health emergencies related to toxic exposures (4).

Acute poisoning is a common emergency that requires early management decisions to ensure optimal outcomes while avoiding lengthy investigations, interventions, or observations. A systematic and individualised approach to patient evaluation and treatment is ideal for providing the best emergency care for acute poisoning. The purpose of this paper is to address the main aspects to consider, in developing an individualised treatment plan for each patient (4).

A rational treatment plan for poisoning involves identifying the poison, assessing the severity of poisoning, initiating supportive care, administering specific antidotes, considering gastrointestinal decontamination, monitoring the patient, and providing appropriate follow-up care (5). The term “poisoning” refers to the process of being exposed to a substance, called a poison or a toxicant that can cause harm or death. Poisoning can occur through ingestion, inhalation, or absorption of the poison into the body through the skin or mucous membranes (6). Poisons can be found in a variety of sources, including household products, pesticides, industrial chemicals, drugs, and certain plants and animals. Symptoms of poisoning can range from mild to severe and can include nausea, vomiting, headache, dizziness, difficulty breathing, seizures, and even coma or death, depending on the type and amount of poison involved. Prompt and appropriate treatment is crucial in cases of poisoning and may involve administering antidotes, providing supportive care, or seeking emergency medical attention (7). Intentional toxic exposure or overdose of drugs can have serious and potentially life-threatening consequences. It is important to seek immediate medical attention if you suspect that someone has intentionally ingested toxic substances or taken an overdose of drugs. The symptoms of drug overdose or toxic exposure can vary depending on the substance involved and the amount taken, but common signs can include confusion, dizziness, difficulty breathing, seizures, and loss of consciousness. In severe cases, overdose can lead to cardiac arrest, coma, and death (8). Snake bites in India are a significant public health issue, with an estimated annual incidence of around 50,000 deaths and 200,000 cases of disability. The incidence of snake bites in India varies by region and season. In general, the incidence of snake bites is higher in rural areas than in urban areas and higher in the monsoon season (June to September) than in other seasons (9). Snake bites are a common occurrence during the monsoon season. There are four main types of venomous snakes found in India (10). The Indian cobra and common krait are known for having neuroparalytic characteristics. Viper bites are responsible for the haematotoxin symptoms (10),(11). The common krait has venom that affects the nervous system and can cause muscle weakness, paralysis, and respiratory failure. The Russell’s viper has a venom that affects the blood-clotting system and can cause bleeding, shock, and kidney failure (11),(12). In addition to these four main types of venomous snakes, there are many non venomous snakes found in India that can still cause harm through bites or other means. It is important to seek immediate medical attention if you are bitten by a snake in India, as prompt treatment with anti- venom can save lives and prevent disability (10),(11),(12).

Prehospital management

The prehospital management of poisoning in a patient begins from the sight of the incident. Early initiation of vomiting can eliminate a major part of the ingested poison. It is still unclear, however, whether early initiation of vomiting influences the outcome (13). In countries where information centres for poison are easily attainable to the general public, people are recommended to keep Carapichea ipecacuanha (Ipecac Syrup USP or Pediatrics Ipecacuanha Emetic Mixture BP) with them (14). When the poison ingested is not identified, the physician does not advise inducing vomiting by the gag reflex or with any chemical agents. If the toxic agent ingested is corrosive, vomiting will impose a second insult on the gastrointestinal tract (upper). Furthermore, if vomiting is induced in patients with lessening consciousness, it can be lethal (15). For the on-site treatment of poisoning the most useful and easy recommendations are as follows:

I. To wet external chemical burns with an abundance of water.
II. If the toxic agent ingested is corrosive then drink some water or milk, it helps in the dilution of the corrosive thus reducing tissue damage.
III. Submerge stings from stonefish or any other deep-sea fish in some hot water (at 45°C) for about 30 to 60 minutes which helps in the inactivation of the toxin which in turn decreases the severity of the symptom (16).

Managementof poisoning inthe Emergency Department

All severely poisoned patients are triaged on arrival at the Emergency Department (ED), as being in a serious or emergency condition (17). A detailed and reliable description of the drug or drugs taken should be sought; which must comprise the drug name, the dose taken, time of intake, and the ingestion of other substances such as alcohol or recreational drugs (if any), which might help in the management of patient’s critical state and drug clearance (18). The patient may be unable to give these details due to unconsciousness or trauma hence incenting history should be obtained from available sources such as witnesses, a packet of the drug consumed, any suicidal notes from the ambulance team, and the patient’s health history (19).

Immediate Care/Initial Management

The preliminary approach to evaluate the critically poisoned patient is based on methodical assessment, proper stabilisation, and compassionate care (20). It is important to reflect on an extensive differential diagnosis to evade impulsively excluding potentially serious conditions which include both toxicological and non toxicological emergencies. The critically poisoned patient may present with central nervous system depression or coma where intubation is essential to effectively protect their airway and reduce the aspiration risk (21). The preliminary precedence in treating critically ill poisoned patients is standard resuscitation that includes airway, breathing, and circulation. An oropharyngeal or nasopharyngeal airway and bag-mask ventilation with the provision of supplemental oxygen may be required in patients with insufficient ventilation caused by reduced respiratory effort or airway compromise until a definitive airway can be obtained in them either through toxin reversal (for example: naloxone for opioids), or rapid succession induction, intubation, and mechanical ventilation (22). A low respiratory rate with reduced oxygen saturation may signify hypoventilation, but note that a normal saturation does not exclude hypoxia in carbon monoxide poisoning. Arterial blood gases should be measured in doubtful conditions, convulsion, and arrhythmia, their onset can be quite sudden hence these toxic symptoms should be observed thoroughly. Gut decontamination should be considered if the physical examination and patient’s history support toxic ingestion (23).

Many drugs demonstrate cardiovascular toxicity in overdose e.g., b-blockers, digoxin, tricyclics, and lithium. This may appear as hypotension and or cardiac arrhythmias. In these cases, pulse, blood pressure, and Electrocardiogram (ECG) should be recorded. Initial fluid resuscitation should be given as appropriate and intravenous access established (24).

Further Management

Additional investigations: Additional laboratory investigations such as urea, electrolytes, and blood glucose as a minimum should be done. Creatinine Kinase (CK) should be measured if there is a suspected probability of rhabdomyolysis or serotonin syndrome (25). Providing a rapid evaluation of acid-base disturbance as well as reviews are the way of ventilation in patients with reduced reconciliation. Even blood gases are helpful. Properly timed drug levels (e.g., paracetamol, lithium, salicylate) should be taken when indicated. If there is any possibility of paracetamol poisoning, paracetamol levels should be sent. Many emergency departments measure paracetamol levels in all patients where poisoning is suspected, as paracetamol poisoning is related to lack of early clinical signs. In conscious overdose patients, who have no indication signifying salicylate and lithium toxicity, and refuse staking salicylate/lithium-containing preparations, there is no need to measure salicylate or lithium concentrations. Salicylate levels should be measured in patients where poisoning is suspected in all unconscious patients. Most poisonings are treated based on observed clinical toxicity rather than drug concentration (26). Temperature, blood glucose (low in β-blocker, ethanol poisoning), and weight should also be recorded. Weight is very important in calculating the dose of the drug whether the patient is likely to have received a toxic dose and may direct treatment, e.g., in paracetamol overdose.

The examination should depict any related injury (accidental or intentional-harm) which may require proper treatment or the presence of other substances such as alcohol. If their clinical condition permit, an assessment of the patient’s mental state should be done (27). In the medicolegal management of poisoned patients or if there is a suspicion of child abuse, toxicology screening may be suitable. Requests for toxicology screens of urgent urine or blood should be discussed with a clinical toxicologist to make them as complete and pertinent as required (28). Patients who come claiming that they have been the victim of a sexual assault after having some contaminated drink, should have biological samples taken for toxicological analysis only if the contaminated drink was taken very recently. Common drugs used in date rape are midazolam and Gamma Hydroxybutyrate (GHB) and they can only be detected in a urine or blood sample obtained within the first few hours of exposure (29).

DiagnosticApproach

Toxidromes

Toxidromes refer to a group of symptoms and signs that are associated with specific classes of toxins or drugs. Recognising the toxidromes can be helpful in identifying the potential cause of poisoning or overdose, and guiding appropriate management (30). The diagnostic approach to toxidromes typically involves a systematic evaluation of the patient’s history, physical examination, and laboratory tests. Here is a general approach to identify toxidromes: Take a complete history, conduct a thorough physical examination, and check for important clinical characteristics (31). Toxidromes are divided according to their site of action, and signs and symptoms as shown in (Table/Fig 1) (32),(33),(34).

Hyperthermic Syndrome

Patients with temperatures greater than 39.0°C should be treated insistently with active cooling measures and cool i.v. fluids because prolonged hyperthermia can result in considerable complications such as acute renal failure, rhabdomyolysis, and disseminated i.v. coagulation (35). In hyperthermic patients with evidence of excessive sympathetic stimulation such as that associated with cocaine and amphetamines, intravenous benzodiazepines are appropriate treatment. Patients with resistant hyperthermia should be discussed with a clinical toxicologist and they may be cured from peripherally acting muscle relaxants (dantrolene), centrally acting serotonin antagonists (cyproheptadine), or general anaesthetic sedation (35).

TreatmentApproach

Decontamination

Inducing emesis is no longer suggested in case of corrosive or volatile substances. Decontamination with ipecac, activated charcoal, gastric lavage, and whole bowel irrigation was once common practice and is in recommendations of the American Academy of Clinical Toxicologists (AACT) and European Association of Poison Centers and Clinical Toxicologists (EAPCCT) (36),(37).

Activated charcoal: The dose of activated charcoal used in cases of poisoning can vary depending on several factors, including the age and weight of the patient, the type and amount of toxin ingested, and the time elapsed since ingestion (37),(38). In general, the recommended dose of activated charcoal for acute poisoning is one gram per kilogram of body weight, up to a maximum of 50-100 g, given orally or via a nasogastric tube. The dose may be repeated every 2-4 hours if needed. If you suspect that someone has ingested a poisonous substance, it is important to seek medical attention immediately. Do not attempt to treat the person with activated charcoal or any other home remedies without medical supervision (39). Doses of activated charcoal should be considered for the adsorption and improved elimination of certain toxins (Table/Fig 2). Certain other substances (including alcohols, lithium, and ferrous salts) however, are not readily adsorbed to charcoal and hence this treatment is not recommended for poisoning with these substances (40).

Gastric lavage: The use of gastric lavage is now limited to life-threatening ingestions that present within one hour of ingestion; and even then, clinical benefit has not been confirmed in controlled studies. To reduce the morbidity of the procedure, certain contra-indications should be noted. They include a defenseless airway, an unhelpful patient, and the ingestion of corrosives or volatile products. Additionally, the appropriate method of gastric lavage is important in minimising the risk of pulmonary aspiration and oesophageal rupture (41).

Whole bowel irrigation: This procedure can be considered for potentially toxic intake of sustained-release or enteric-coated drugs. A laxative agent such as polyethylene glycol is administered to fully flush the bowel of stool and unabsorbed xenobiotics (41).

Antidotes

Antidotes are available only for a restricted number of drugs and poisons. While most of the poisoning cases are managed mainly with appropriate supportive care, numerous precise antidote agents may be employed. A few antidotes are commonly utilised in the management of acute poisoning (42). The table below lists some of the more common antidotes for definite poisonings used in clinical practice. Antidotes commonly used in the management of poisoned patients are in (Table/Fig 3) (42).

Enhancement of Clearance/Dialysis

For agents that can be excreted as weak acids in the urine, Urine alkalinisation can be considered. If metabolic acidosis due to poisoning continues, even with the correction of hypoxia and adequate fluid resuscitation, then correction with intravenous sodium bicarbonate should be considered. Rapid correction is predominantly important if there is a prolongation of the QRS or QT intervals on the ECG (43). In adults, an initial dose of 50 mmol of sodium bicarbonate may be given and can be repeated if essential (as guided by arterial blood gas monitoring) (44).

Dialysis may be done for poisons that are amenable to filtration across dialysis membranes. These comprise agents that possess a low molecular weight, low volume of distribution as well as low protein binding. Examples of such agents are salicylates, lithium, methylxanthines, and toxic alcohol. Criteria for dialysis are inconsistent across different types of poisonings (44). In cases of acute poisoning, haemodialysis should be considered for extracorporeal toxin removal as well as for the management of acute kidney injury. Seizures can be controlled primarily with intravenous diazepam (10-20 mg in adults; 0.25 mg.kg-1 body weight in children) or lorazepam (4 mg in adults; 0.1 mg.kg-1 body weight in children) (45).

Conclusion

Emergency physicians should take a more active role in the emergency management of severe poisoning, not only in the ED but also in the prehospital setting, where early decontamination by various methods and antidote treatment can be instigated if obligatory. Treatment should provide supportive measures using an Airway, Breathing, and Circulation (ABC) approach. Further interventions should be added to reduce the absorption and increase elimination, and proper administration of an appropriate antidote.

References

1.
Haddad and Winchester. Emergency management of poisoning clinical management of poisoning and drug overdose. 2007;13-61. https://doi. org/10.1016/B978-0-7216-0693-4.50007-4. [crossref]
2.
Burkhart KK, Wuerz RC, Donovan JW. Whole-bowel irrigation as an adjunctive treatment for sustained-release theophylline overdose. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21(11):1316-20. Doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81894-3. PMID: 1416325. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Gummin DD, Mowry JB, Beuhler MC, Spyker DA, Brooks DE, Dibert KW, et al. 2019 Annual Report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers’ National Poison Data System (NPDS): 37th Annual Report. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2020;58(12):1360-541. https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2020.1834219 [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Kirshenbaum LA, Sitar DS, Tenenbein M. Interaction between whole-bowel irrigation solution and activated charcoal: Implications for the treatment of toxic ingestions. Ann Emerg Med. 1990;19(10):1129-32. Doi: 10.1016/s0196- 0644(05)81516-1. PMID: 2221518. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Chacko B, Peter JV. Antidotes in poisoning. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2019;23(Suppl 4):S241-49. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23310. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Audi J, Belson M, Patel M, Schier J, Osterloh J. Ricin poisoning: A comprehensive review. JAMA. 2005;294(18):2342-51. Doi: 10.1001/jama.294.18.2342. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Peshin SS, Gupta YK. Poisoning due to household products: A ten years retrospective analysis of telephone calls to the National Poisons Information Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. J Forensic Leg Med. 2018;58:205-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2018.07.005. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Augenstein WL, Israel S, Kulig KW, Rumack BH. Diflunisal overdose with hypotension, tachycardia, and hyperventilation. Abstract. Vet Hum Toxicol. 1987;29:478.
9.
Suraweera W, Warrell D, Whitaker R, Menon G, Rodrigues R, Fu SH, et al. Trends in snakebite deaths in India from 2000 to 2019 in a nationally representative mortality study. Life. 2020;9:e54076. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54076. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Whitaker R. Common Indian snakes: A field guide. Macmillan; 2006.
11.
Sarat S. Study of systemic manifestations of snake bite & their outcome in tertiary care centre (Doctoral dissertation, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences (India)).
12.
Halesha BR, Harshavardhan LL, Lokesh AJ. A study on the clinical- epidemiological profile and the outcome of snake bite victims in a tertiary care center in southern India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(1):122-26. https://doi. org/10.7860/JCDR/2012/4842.2685.
13.
Silva A, Maduwage K, Sedgwick M, Pilapitiya S, Weerawansa P, et al. Neuromuscular effects of common krait (Bungarus caeruleus) envenoming in Sri Lanka. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(2):e0004368. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pntd.0004368. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Sme? dra A, Wochna K, Zawadzki D, Berent J. Medical error in the treatment of Amanita phalloides poisoning in pre-hospital care. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2022;30(1):20. Doi: 10.1186/s13049-022-01008-2. PMID: 35305697; PMCID: PMC8933750. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Avau B, Borra V, Vanhove AC, Vandekerckhove P, De Paepe P, De Buck E, Cochrane Injuries Group. First aid interventions by laypeople for acute oral poisoning. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 1996;2019(7). [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Greene S, Harris C, Singer J. Gastrointestinal decontamination of the poisoned patient. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008;24(3):176-89. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC. 0b013e318166a092. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Darlene FO, Phee-Kheng C. Hot water immersion as a treatment for stonefish sting: A case report. Malays Fam Physician. 2013;8(1):28-32.
18.
Ye L, Zhou G, He X, Shen W, Gan J, Zhang M. Prolonged length of stay in the emergency department in high-acuity patients at a Chinese tertiary hospital. Emerg Med Australas. 2012;24(6):634-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-6723. 2012.01588.x. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Gallagher N, Edwards FJ. The diagnosis and management of toxic alcohol poisoning in the emergency department: A review article. Adv J Emerg Med. 2019;3(3):e28. https://doi.org/10.22114/ajem.v0i0.153.
20.
Barraclough BM, Bunch J, Nelson B, Sainsbury P. A hundred cases of suicide: Clinical aspects. Br J Psychiatry. 1974;125(587):355-73. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Rothman MJ, Tepas III JJ, Nowalk AJ, Levin JE, Rimar JM, Marchetti A, et al. Development and validation of a continuously age-adjusted measure of patient condition for hospitalized children using the electronic medical record. J Biomed Inform. 2017;66:180-93. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Vale JA, Meredith TJ, Buckley BM. Paraquat poisoning: Clinical features and immediate general management. Hum Toxicol. 1987;6(1):41-47. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
McClung C, Hotaling JM, Wang J, Wessells H, Voelzke BB. Contemporary trends in the immediate surgical management of renal trauma using a national database. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75(4):602-06. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Erickson TB, Thompson TM, Lu JJ. The approach to the patient with an unknown overdose. Emerg Med Clin N Am. 2007;25(2):249-81. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Khan A, Ring NJ, Hughes PD. Scimitar syndrome (congenital pulmonary venolobar syndrome). Postgrad Med J. 2005;81(954):216. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Scalco RS, Snoeck M, Quinlivan R, Treves S, Laforét P, Jungbluth H, et al. Exertional rhabdomyolysis: Physiological response or manifestation of an underlying myopathy? BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2016;2(1):e000151. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Kastelik JA, Aziz I, Ojoo JC, Thompson RH, Redington AE, Morice AH. Investigation and management of chronic cough using a probability-based algorithm. Eur Respir J. 2005;25(2):235-43. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Scandura TA. Mentorship and career mobility: An empirical investigation. J Organ Behav. 1992;13(2):169-74. [crossref]
29.
Basuroy R, Srirajaskanthan R, Prachalias A, Quaglia A, Ramage JK. The investigation and management of gastric neuroendocrine tumors. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;39(10):1071-84. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Prekupec MP, Mansky PA, Baumann MH. Misuse of novel synthetic opioids: A deadly new trend. J Addict Med. 2017;11(4):256. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Mégarbane B. Toxidrome based approach to common poisonings. Asia Pac J Med Toxicol. 2014;3:2-12.
32.
Malek N, Baker MR. Common toxidromes in movement disorder neurology. Postgrad Med J. 2017;93(1100):326-32. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Waseem M, Perry C, Bomann S, Pai M, Gernsheimer J. Cholinergic crisis after rodenticide poisoning. West J Emerg Med. 2010;11(5):524.
34.
Ciottone GR. Toxidrome recognition in chemical-weapons attacks. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(17):1611-20. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Nelson TE, Flewellen EH. The malignant hyperthermia syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1983;309(7):416-18. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Greene SL, Dargan PI, Jones AL. Acute poisoning: Understanding 90% of cases in a nutshell. Postgrad Med J. 2005;81(954):204-16. [crossref][PubMed]
37.
Ardagh M, Flood D, Tait C. Limiting the use of gastrointestinal decontamination does not worsen the outcome from deliberate self-poisoning. N Z Med J. 2001;114(1140):423.
38.
Eddleston M, Juszczak E, Buckley NA, Senarathna L, Mohamed F, Dissanayake W, et al. Multiple-dose activated charcoal in acute self-poisoning: A randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;371(9612):579-87. [crossref][PubMed]
39.
Zellner T, Prasa D, Färber E, Hoffmann-Walbeck P, Genser D, Eyer F. The use of activated charcoal to treat intoxications. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019;116(18):311-17. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2019.0311. [crossref][PubMed]
40.
Lowry JA. Use of activated charcoal in pediatric populations. In: Second Meeting of the Subcommittee of the Expert Committee on the Selection and Use of Essential Medicines, The Children’s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Geneva 2008 Jan.
41.
Vale JA. Position statement: Gastric lavage. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1997;35(7):711-19. https://doi.org/ 10.3109/15563659709162568. [crossref][PubMed]
42.
Betten DP, Vohra RB, Cook MD, Matteucci MJ, Clark RF. Antidote use in the critically ill poisoned patient. J Intensive Care Med. 2006;21(5):255-77. [crossref][PubMed]
43.
Dart RC, Borron SW, Caravati EM, Cobaugh DJ, Curry SC, Falk JL, et al. Expert consensus guidelines for stocking of antidotes in hospitals that provide emergency care. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54(3):386-94. [crossref][PubMed]
44.
Lowrie EG, Chertow GM, Lew NL, Lazarus JM, Owen WF. The urea {clearance× dialysis time} product (Kt) as an outcome-based measure of hemodialysis dose. Kidney Int. 1999;56(2):729-37. [crossref][PubMed]
45.
Bayliss G. Dialysis in the poisoned patient. Hemodial Int. 2010;14(2):158-67. [crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/62534.18279

Date of Submission: Dec 28, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Mar 22, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Apr 27, 2023
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Dec 29, 2022
• Manual Googling: Mar 16, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Apr 24, 2023 (16%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com