Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 47928

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : August | Volume : 17 | Issue : 8 | Page : OC14 - OC18 Full Version

Pulmonary Manifestations of Dengue Fever at a Tertiary Care Centre in Northern India: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: August 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/63382.18343
Sanjay Fotedar, Jasminder Singh, Anubha Garg, Mohini Chinu, Vikas Chaudhary, Vaibhav Gaur

1. Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Pt. B. D. Sharma, PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 2. Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Pt. B. D. Sharma, PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 3. Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Pt. B. D. Sharma, PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 4. Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Pt. B. D. Sharma, PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 5. Assistant Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Pt. B. D. Sharma, PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 6. Senior Resident, Department of Internal Medicine, Pt. B. D. Sharma, PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India.

Correspondence Address :
Vaibhav Gaur,
Room No. 332, Doctors Hostel, Medical Campus, PGIMS, Rohtak-124001, Haryana, India.
E-mail: Gaurvaibhav30@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Dengue Fever (DF) is associated with systemic inflammation, clinically manifesting as involvement of different organ systems, including the pulmonary system. Pulmonary involvement is characterised by pleural effusion, pneumonia, haemoptysis, pulmonary haemorrhage, secondary bacterial infections with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), and Dengue Haemorrhagic Shock Syndrome (DHSS), which are the leading causes of mortality and morbidity.

Aim: This study aims to analyse the pleuropulmonary manifestations associated with DF.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care centre in northern India from June 2018 to November 2018. A total of 140 patients diagnosed with DF using Non-Structural protein 1 (NS1), Immunoglobulin (Ig)M, (Ig)G rapid card tests and confirmed by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) were included. Patients were examined for pleuropulmonary manifestations and other systemic features. Baseline investigations, including Complete Blood Count (CBC), Haematocrit (Hct), Liver Function Test (LFT), Renal Function Test (RFT), chest X-ray (PA view), and High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) of the chest when required, were performed. Data analysis was carried out by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0.

Results: A total of 140 patients (108 males and 32 females) aged between 18 and 35 years were included and analysed. Among them, 113 (81%) were diagnosed with uncomplicated febrile illness, 17 (12%) with Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever (DHF), and 10 (7%) as Dengue Shock Syndrome (DSS). Patients with co-morbidities, particularly respiratory system illnesses, and young patients were found to be at increased risk of morbidity. Pleuropulmonary manifestations observed in the study included pleural effusion, pneumonia, pulmonary haemorrhage, ARDS, and pneumothorax.

Conclusion: DF is associated with the involvement of the pulmonary system, and its incidence is increased in cases of moderate to severe disease. Therefore, pleuropulmonary manifestations can be useful in evaluating the severity of DF cases.

Keywords

Dengue shock syndrome, Haemorrhage, Oedema, Pneumonia, Shock

Dengue Fever (DF) is a self-limiting mosquito-transmitted acute febrile illness caused by an arbovirus (genus flavivirus). It is clinically characterised by a spectrum that varies between asymptomatic and severe disease states with fatal complications. All four serotypes of the dengue virus can cause the disease, which varies from mild self-limiting to severe forms such as DHF or DSS. Dengue viral infections represent a significant healthcare problem in tropical and sub-tropical regions worldwide. The World Health Organisation (WHO) estimates that there are about 50-100 million dengue cases with approximately 22,000 deaths each year (1),(2). The epidemic trend in India is on the rise, and all four serotypes are found in the country. Symptomatic dengue virus infections are grouped into categories: 1) undifferentiated fever; 2) DF; 3) DHF; and 4) expanded dengue syndrome (3).

Most cases are self-limiting and present as non-specific febrile illnesses. Severe forms such as DHF and DSS are associated with systemic manifestations that involve almost every body organ. Severe forms are characterised by immune activation and increased levels of Tumour Necrosis Factor (TNF), Interleukin 8 (IL-8), and other mediators of inflammation, and endothelium being the target of immunopathological mechanisms.

These mechanisms lead to varied systemic manifestations, including those in the pulmonary system. DHF is associated with ARDS, with dengue virus antigen lining the alveolar epithelial cells. Increased vascular permeability is associated with interstitial oedema, leading to pulmonary dysfunction. Pulmonary haemorrhage is found to be associated with or without haemoptysis. Pleural effusion and ascites are attributed to plasma leakage, increased vascular permeability, and haemostatic dysfunction, and they can also be influenced by co-morbid conditions involving the pulmonary system (3),(4),(5). Thus, the aim of the present study was to analyse the pleuro-pulmonary manifestations in patients with DF.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Internal Medicine, Pt. BDS PGIMS Rohtak, Haryana, India, from June 2018 to November 2018, for a duration of six months. A total of 140 patients admitted to the medicine wards with complaints of fever and thrombocytopenia, subsequently diagnosed as cases of DF, were enrolled after obtaining proper consent from the patients and receiving due consideration and approval from the Ethical Committee (IEC/18/623). The sample size was calculated using an online sample size calculator at clincalc.com, with final sample size of 135.

Inclusion criteria: Patients above 18 years of age, diagnosed with DF based on NS1, IgG/IgM (rapid card test), and confirmed by ELISA (IgG and IgM).

Exclusion criteria: Patients below 18 years of age, febrile thrombocytopenia, and bleeding manifestations due to other causes were excluded from the study.

A total of 163 patients were initially enrolled, out of which 23 patients were excluded for not meeting the inclusion criteria. Finally, 140 patients were included in this study.

Procedure

Patients admitted to the hospital, after fulfilling the mentioned criteria, were enrolled in the study. A detailed history was recorded, including the patient’s demographic profile, any previous co-morbidities, duration of febrile illness, headache, retro-orbital pain, backache, abdominal pain, nausea, cough with haemoptysis, myalgia, and rashes. A complete physical and systemic examination was done to evaluate systemic involvement. Blood samples were taken for Complete Haemogram (CH), Total Leukocyte Count (TLC)/Differential Leukocyte Count (DLC), Haematocrit (Hct), Absolute Platelet Count (APC), Bleeding Time (BT), Clotting Time (CT), Prothrombin Time (PT) (to rule out any bleeding disorders), LFT, RFT, serum electrolytes, and complete urine examination. Imaging studies included a chest X-ray for every patient, abdominal Ultrasonography (USG), and High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) of the chest as and when required. Serology included NS1, IgG, and IgM by rapid card test, with confirmation by ELISA. The collected data were evaluated using appropriate statistical tests.

Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was carried out using SPSS (IBM version 25.0). Clinical and laboratory parameter data were expressed in numbers and percentages.

Results

This study included 140 patients, with 108 males and 32 females, resulting in an M:F ratio of 2.86 (Table/Fig 1). According to the Traditional WHO classification (1997), there were 121 cases of DF, 15 cases of DHF, and four cases of DSS. The highest number of cases was observed in the 18-35 years age group for both males and females. The lowest number of cases was found in the age group >55 years (25%). The study included 93 (66.43%) patients from rural areas and 47 (33.57%) from urban areas (Table/Fig 1). Out of the 140 patients, 113 (80.72%) were diagnosed with DF, 17 (12.14%) presented with haemorrhagic manifestations, and 10 (7.14%) presented with DSS (Table/Fig 2). The most common presenting features included fever (100%), body aches (79.28%), abdominal pain (65%), arthralgia (64.28%), vomiting and nausea (59.28%), retro-orbital pain (49.28%), rashes (40.71%), bleeding (20.71%), and jaundice (13.57%) (Table/Fig 3). Among the 140 patients, 40 (28.57%) had hypertension, five had diabetes mellitus, six patients with chronic kidney disease, five had chronic liver disease, four had chronic pulmonary diseases, and three had chronic cardiac diseases (Table/Fig 4).

A total of 113 cases were diagnosed as dengue cases with mild systemic involvement, 17 with DHF, and 10 with DSS. The most common pleuropulmonary manifestation was pleural effusion (28.57%), followed by pneumonia (11.42%), ARDS (8.57%), and DSS with lung involvement in 7.14 cases. Pleural effusion was the most common complication among pleuropulmonary complications, observed in 40 (28.57%) patients, followed by pneumonia in 16 (11.42%) patients, ARDS in 12 (8.57%) patients, and pneumothorax in one patient (Table/Fig 5).

Regarding haematological findings, 85% of patients had a platelet count below 150,000, with 30 patients requiring platelet transfusion. 53 patients had leukopenia, and 44% showed an increase in Hct (Table/Fig 6). Out of the total patients, 99 (71.71%) were having positive for NS1Ag, 25 (17.85%) showed IgM positivity, and 16 (11.42%) were positive for both antigen and antibody (Table/Fig 7).

Among the patients, 40 (28.57%) patients were having pleural effusion, 16 (11.42%) had pneumonia, 12 (8.57%) were having ARDS pattern on X-ray, and only one patient had pneumothorax (Table/Fig 8). HRCT was performed on 30 patients, which showed pleural effusion in all 30 patients, pneumonia in 16 (53.33%) patients, an ARDS pattern in 12 (40%) patients, pneumothorax in two patients, and pulmonary haemorrhage in one patient (Table/Fig 9).

The clinical features of DF, including fever, body ache, arthralgia, abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting, were observed in patients with pleuropulmonary complications. Patients with respiratory symptoms such as cough, haemoptysis, and shortness of breath were treated with supplementary oxygen, ventilator support, and conservative medical management.

Discussion

Dengue, an acute febrile illness caused by the flavivirus and primarily occurring in tropical and subtropical regions, is a significant health problem. It is now endemic in more than 100 countries worldwide (5). In recent years, there has been an emerging trend of the disease, resulting in a major health issue in South-East Asia, including India. The WHO guidelines from 2009 categorise patients with DF into non-severe and severe forms. The non-severe form is further divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of warning signs (1),(2). The non-severe form without warning signs includes patients who live in endemic areas or have a travel history to endemic areas and present with fever and at least two of the following clinical features: vomiting, nausea, body aches, rash, leukopenia, and a positive tourniquet test (2). The non-severe form with warning signs includes patients with the aforementioned features plus persistent vomiting, abdominal pain, tiredness, third space fluid collection (pleural effusion and ascites), bleeding (mucosal), restlessness, lethargy, hepatomegaly (>2 cm), and increased hematocrit with a rapid decrease in platelet count. The severe form of the disease is described as having one of the following clinical features: shock due to severe plasma leak, with or without fluid accumulation, respiratory distress, severe bleeding, or systemic organ involvement (1),(2),(3).

DF is characterised by systemic inflammation, manifesting as systemic involvement that affects almost every organ system. While DF can occur in all age groups, there is an increased incidence in the younger age group (18-30 years), with a higher prevalence in males. Clinical manifestations of systemic involvement include fever, body aches, myalgias (with varying incidence), headache, 16arthralgias, retro-orbital pain, nausea with abdominal pain, jaundice, and haemorrhagic manifestations include petechiae, epistaxis, hematuria, melena, and internal bleeding. Organ dysfunction may also occur depending on the extent of involvement (6). Dyspnoea may be attributed to pleural effusion (commonly), ARDS, pulmonary haemorrhage, pneumonia, and shock. The present study aimed to evaluate the pleuropulmonary manifestations, as well as associated systemic involvement.

In the present study, DF was found to be more prevalent in the younger and productive age group, with a higher incidence in males, as they are more commonly exposed to the vector. The clinical presentation of DF correlated with laboratory parameters such as TLC, platelet count, leukopenia, Hct, and serology, which were consistent with various studies reported in the literature (4),(5),(7).

The severity of Pleural Effusion (PE) varied from unilateral to bilateral, ranging from mild and asymptomatic to massive bilateral effusion requiring therapeutic tap and diuretics. The severity of pleural effusion correlated with capillary leak, decrease in platelet count, increased vascular permeability, hypoalbuminemia, and associated complications as ARDS/DHSS (8). Pleural effusion is usually mild and considered a transudate, but when significant, it is considered a sign of severe disease and impending complications, including ARDS, DHF, and DHSS. In severe cases, hemothorax has also been reported. Diagnostic modalities for detecting and evaluating pleural effusion include chest X-ray, Ultrasonography (USG), HRCT of the chest, and biochemical and cytological analysis of pleural fluid, with predominantly transudate on biochemical analysis (7),(8),(9).

Pleuropulmonary manifestations of DF include pleural effusion, pneumonia (including primary viral pneumonitis and secondary bacterial infections), pulmonary haemorrhage (with or without haemoptysis), non-cardiogenic pulmonary oedema, and ARDS in severe cases (10),(11). Pleural effusion was the most common pleuropulmonary complication observed in the present study.

Pneumonia was the second most common respiratory complication observed, with clinical presentation and chest X-ray and HRCT findings consistent with secondary bacterial infection (12). Dengue is not known to cause primary pneumonia, but inflammation of the lung parenchyma leads to plasma leakage and leukopenia, which predisposes to secondary bacterial infections and complicates

the natural course of the disease, particularly in patients with severe disease and comorbid conditions (6). Secondary infections can manifest as pneumonia, bacteremia, and bacteriuria, with Staphylococcus aureus and mycoplasma, along with influenza viral infections, complicating the course of DF (9),(13). In the present study, pneumonia was observed in 11% of the cohort, with varying incidence reported in the literature. Secondary infections, including pneumonia, should be suspected when prolonged fever, suppressed Total Leukocyte Count (TLC), and progression of the disease to a severe form are observed.

Prompt evaluation for secondary infections, including pneumonia, should be done through sputum examination and culture, as well as blood and urine culture, along with imaging studies. Prompt antibiotic therapy should be instituted. Cough, haemoptysis, and dyspnoea were also observed as significant respiratory manifestations and precursors of severe life-threatening complications such as ARDS and DHSS. Patients with ARDS were found to have associated complications such as Gastrointestinal Tract (GIT) bleeding, petechiae, epistaxis, and secondary bacterial infections, as low platelet count and sepsis are reported as precursors of ARDS in patients with DF. ARDS was observed in 12 (8.57%) cases in the present study (5),(9),(13).

In dengue-endemic areas, Dengue Haemorrhagic Shock Syndrome (DHSS) is reported as the leading cause of ARDS. The main cause of pleuropulmonary manifestations has been attributed to thrombocytopenia and capillary leak syndrome. Atypical presentations, such as cholecystitis and ARDS, sometimes complicate management, as ARDS can develop rapidly and increase mortality and morbidity. Prognostic factors described in the literature include age, co-morbid conditions, coagulopathy, and transaminitis (9),(12),(14). Dengue virus is detected in pulmonary endothelial cells and macrophages, and histopathological findings in fatal cases show haemorrhage and interstitial pneumonitis (9).

There is infiltration of the lung parenchyma with mononuclear cells and hyperplasia of alveolar macrophages, with hyaline membrane formation and hypertrophy of type II pneumocytes. Clinically, ARDS does not differ from the classical presentation, with symptoms including hypoxia, respiratory distress, suppression of Total Leukocyte Count (TLC), and an altered alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient. Progression to the severe form characterises the clinical picture (10),(13).

Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever (DHF) is clinically characterised by increased capillary permeability resulting in fluid extravasation, haemostatic abnormalities with decreased platelet count, and haemorrhagic manifestations. Major haemorrhage in severe cases is associated with shock, sometimes refractory, leading to DSS, in present study, DHF was observed in 21 (15%) patients. The development of DHF involves a complex interplay of the virus, immune response, and intrinsic host factors. Clinically, DHF is characterised by dyspnoea, haemoptysis, and hypotension. Imaging studies, especially HRCT of the chest, reveal thickening of interlobar septa, Ground-glass Opacities (GGO), poorly defined small nodules, and features of Diffuse Alveolar Haemorrhage (DAH) in severe cases. Although DAH is infrequently reported as a complication of DF, it is a known complication. The incidence of DAH reported in the literature is 1.4%, and two patients (1.42%) in this study were observed to have DAH (9).

Alveolar haemorrhage is attributed to multiple factors, including low platelet count with platelet dysfunction, coagulation abnormalities, capillary dysfunction, and Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC). The classical triad described in Diffuse Alveolar Haemorrhage (DAH) includes haemoptysis, a rapid fall in hemoglobin levels over a period of 24-48 hours, and the appearance of new pulmonary infiltrates on imaging. DSS usually develops when patients have prolonged hypotension and severe plasma leakage, with a higher incidence of ARDS than in patients with DHF alone. Pneumothorax is rare in dengue fever, with only a few case reports described. Pneumothorax can be due to the exacerbation of underlying chronic pulmonary disease or complications associated with mechanical ventilation (13). Cough, with or without expectoration, and haemoptysis are important clinical manifestations in patients with respiratory system involvement. These symptoms are attributed to interstitial oedema, haemostatic dysfunction, and secondary infections. Dyspnea is due to pulmonary parenchymal inflammation, oedema, exacerbation of underlying comorbid conditions, and complications including ARDS, pulmonary haemorrhage, and congestive heart failure. At times, ascites can also contribute to dyspnoea. In patients with undifferentiated fever and unexplained dyspnoea, along with haemoptysis and pulmonary infiltrates on imaging, dengue fever should be considered as a differential diagnosis.

Imaging studies, such as chest X-ray, usually reveal pleural effusion with or without pneumonitis as a common finding. Areas of consolidation can be patchy and bilateral, with features of ARDS in severe cases. HRCT of the chest is being used to assess the severity and complications, which include pleural effusion and lung parenchymal involvement, such as consolidation with air bronchograms, multifocal Ground-glass Opacities (GGO), pleural effusion with interlobar septal thickening and a crazy-paving pattern, and findings of alveolar haemorrhage in severe cases (12),(14). Complications associated with dengue fever significantly correlate with a fall in platelet count as a marker of disease progression and impending respiratory system complications (10),(11),(12),(13).

Pleuropulmonary complications, though less common in non-severe cases of dengue fever, commonly complicate moderate to severe cases and pose challenges in management (8). A high degree of clinical suspicion and early diagnosis are of utmost importance in order to decrease morbidity and mortality. Patients diagnosed with dengue fever, particularly moderate to severe cases, should be evaluated daily for systemic involvement, especially in the pulmonary system. While there is no specific treatment available for dengue fever, early detection of systemic complications and introduction of supportive treatment, including correction of abnormalities and proper monitoring, can significantly improve clinical outcomes (10),(14).

Limitation(s)

Firstly, this study was conducted at a single centre, so a smaller number of patients were enrolled. Secondly, other systemic manifestations were not included in this study.

Conclusion

Dengue Fever (DF) is associated with involvement of the pulmonary system, with pleural effusion being the most common manifestation. Other complications are also seen in the more severe forms of dengue, such as DSS and DHF, which can have a complicated course and can be fatal if not managed properly and in a timely manner. Additionally, pulmonary manifestations can serve as a useful clinical tool for assessing the severity of DF. Pleuropulmonary manifestations are a valuable clinical tool that correlates well with the severity of dengue.

References

1.
WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines committee. Dengue: Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment, prevention and control. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44188.
2.
WHO (2011), Comprehensive Guidelines for Prevention and Control of Dengue and Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever. Revised and Expanded Edition, Regional Office of SEAR. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/204894.
3.
Gupta S, Singh L, Tandon R. Study of pulmonary manifestations among dengue patients in tertiary care hospital of North India. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research 2020;7(5):E1-E5. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21276/ijcmr.2020.7.5.11. [crossref]
4.
Patil ST, Virupaksha KL, Kavyashree NG. A study of clinical manifestations and complications of dengue fever in medical college hospital. Int J Med Res Rev. 2019;7(3):224-30. [crossref]
5.
Cheepsattayakorn A, Cheepsattayakorn R. Dengue-virus infection: Lung involvement, clinical implications, and associated human leucocyte antigen. J Resp Med Res Treatment. 2014;2014:162245. Doi: 10.5171.162245.
6.
Htun TP, Xiong Z, Pang J. Clinical signs and symptoms associated with WHO severe dengue classification: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Emerging Microbes & Infections. 2021;10(1):1116-28. Doi: 10.1080/22221751.2021.1935327. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Mallhi TH, Khan AH, Adnan AS, Sariff A, Khan YH, Jummat F. Clinico-laboratory spectrum of dengue viral infection and risk factors associated with dengue hemorrhagic fever: A retrospective study. BMC Inf Dis. 2015;15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-1141-3. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Patil AA. Clinico laboratory profile of suspected dengue patients in a tertiary care hospital. MedPulse-Int Med J. 2015;2:54-57. Available at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?journal=MedPulse+%E2%80%93+Int+Med+J&title=Clinico+laboratory+profile+of+suspected+dengue+patients+in+a+tertiary+care+hospital&author=A+A+Patil&volume=2&publication_year=2015&pages=54-57&.
9.
WHO | Global Strategy for dengue prevention and control, 2012-2020. WHO. 2012. Available at: https://www.who.int/denguecontrol/9789241504034/en/.
10.
Isea-Dubic J, Caribay V, Jobe AS. Pleuro-pulmonary complications in dengue haemorrhagic fever. CHEST. 2008;134(4):33001. [crossref]
11.
Singh VK, Haria JM, Jain SK. Hosptial based study of dengue haemorrhagic fever in Western UP Region. Int J Sci Std. 2014;1(5):32-34. Available at: http://www.ijss-sn.com/uploads/2/0/1/5/20153321/ijss_feb-08.pdf.
12.
Das P, Mahendran CS, Saxena P, Sahay S, Chandra E, Sarath S. Pulmonary manifestations of dengue: Case series. Int J Adv Eng Manag. 2021;20(11);01-05.
13.
Rafi A, Mousumi AN, Ahmed R, Chowdhury RH, Wadood A, Hossain G. Dengue epidemic in a non-endemic zone of Bangladesh: Clinical and laboratory profiles of patients. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14(10):e0008567. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pntd.0008567. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Marchiori E, Ferreira JL, Bittencourt CN, Neto CA, Zanetti G, Mano CM, et. al. Pulmonary hemorrhage associated with dengue fever, High-resolution computed tomography findings: A case report. orphaned. J Rare Dis. 2009;4:8. Available at: https;//doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-4-8.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63382.18343

Date of Submission: Feb 21, 2023
Date of Peer Review: May 09, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jun 23, 2023
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 24, 2023
• Manual Googling: May 12, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jun 19, 2023 (19%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 5

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com