Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 159865

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : August | Volume : 17 | Issue : 8 | Page : EC07 - EC11 Full Version

Histopathological Analysis of Lung Infections during Pre and Post COVID-19 Eras: Insights from a Four-Year Autopsy Study at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India


Published: August 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/63723.18258
Yogambal Muthureddy, Mahalakshmi Kandasamy, Selvam Abathu Katha Pillai, Swaminathan Kalyanasundaram

1. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Tirunelveli Medical College, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Tirunelveli Medical College, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Tirunelveli Medical College, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Professor and Head, Department of Pathology, Tirunelveli Medical College, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Yogambal Muthureddy,
Plot No. 9, Mahalakshmi Flats, Flat D, 2nd Floor, CRR Puram, L&T Colony, Manapakkam, Chennai-600125, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: yogambaldr@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Autopsies are routinely useful in establishing the cause and time of death. The Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19), a pandemic viral infectious disease, has affected many countries worldwide. In developing countries like India, infectious lung pathology has been a significant cause of death even before the COVID-19 era. However, the emergence of COVID-19, there has been an increase in lung infections due to factors such as prolonged hospital stays, assisted ventilation, lung damage, and immune suppression, affecting both morbid patients and survivors.

Aim: To describe the histopathological spectrum of infective lesions of lung in autopsy during Pre COVID-19 and COVID-19 era in a tertiary care hospital of Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Pathology at Tirunelveli Medical College, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India, between January 2018 and December 2021. Data including age, sex, COVID-19 status, clinical history, histomorphological patterns, and identification of infectious agents, were collected from clinico-pathological and autopsy documents. A total of 627 lung specimens were available, with 41 specimens being autolyzed, leaving 586 specimens for inclusion in the study. Gross morphology and microscopic features were documented, and diagnoses were made based on these findings.

Results: The study included a total of 586 specimens, of which 76 (12.9%) were reported as infective pathology. Among these cases, 29 (38.1%) cases were reported in the pre COVID-19 period, and 47 (61.9%) were reported during the COVID-19 period. Of the 76 cases, 41 (53.95%) were male, and 35 (46.05%) were female. The number of cases reported during the post COVID-19 period (47 cases, 61.84%) was higher than the number reported during the pre COVID-19 period (29 cases, 38.16%). In both periods, the majority of cases (10 cases, 13.1% in the pre COVID-19 period; 13 cases, (17.1%) in the post COVID-19 period) were observed in individuals aged 60 years and above, followed by those in the age group of 50 to 59 years (7 cases, 9.2%). Similarly, in the pre COVID-19 period; 10 cases, 13.2% in the post COVID-19 period). Among the 76 cases, interstitial pneumonia (9 cases, 11.8%) was the most common finding in the pre COVID-19 period, followed by bronchopneumonia (seven cases, 9.2%). In the COVID-19 period, Tuberculosis (TB) was the most common finding (17 cases, 22.4%), followed by pneumonia with consolidation (10 cases, 13.2%). Additionally, the number of cases diagnosed with pulmonary TB during the COVID-19 period (17 cases, 22.4%) was higher than that during the pre COVID-19 period (6 cases, 7.9%). During the post COVID-19 period, there has been a drastic increase in the number of pneumonia cases compared to the pre COVID-19 era, and this increase is statistically significant with a p-value of 0.04.

Conclusion: Pneumonia (lobar pneumonia, interstitial pneumonia, and bronchopneumonia) is the most common histopathological lung lesion in the present study. Compare to pre COVID-19 era, there is increased number of infective lesions during COVID-19 era. There was a drastic increase in pathological findings of Kochs lesion during COVID-19 era.

Keywords

Aspergilloma, Coronavirus disease-2019, Pneumonia, Tuberculosis

The worldwide impact of the COVID-19 pandemic caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-COV-2) virus has been substantial on clinical, social, and economic fronts (1),(2). The virus induces a strong immunological response and cytokine storm that results in an excessive inflammatory reaction (3). As a result, immunosuppressive treatments, including the use of steroids, have been recommended in severely and critically ill patients to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19 (4). However, in some instances, the inappropriate use of immunosuppressive drugs or steroids in COVID-19 treatment has resulted in complications, such as opportunistic infections. Respiratory system pathology is the second most frequent cause of sudden and unexpected death across the globe. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, congestion, oedema, and interstitial pneumonia were the most commonly observed respiratory conditions, along with other infections (5). In the pre COVID-19 era, lung infections were primarily associated with elderly individuals and those with weakened immune systems. Compared to the pre COVID-19 era, the involvement of the lungs due to infectious causes increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. This was attributed to immune suppression caused by the virus, prolonged assisted ventilation, and extended hospital stays (6). In developing countries, the lockdown’s effects, limited medical access, fear of hospital stay, and economic crisis led to a rise in chronic infections like TB and opportunistic infections during the COVID-19 period. Notably, the lungs were the primary organ affected by COVID-19, which contributed to the increased incidence of lung infections during this time (7).

In light of these developments, the authors conducted a retrospective analysis of clinico-pathological, autopsy findings, and histopathological findings of lung specimens from our institute, a tertiary care center in Tirunelveli. The analysis was conducted for two periods: pre COVID-19 (January 2018 to December 2019) and COVID-19 (January 2020 to December 2021) to evaluate the trend and nature of lung infections during these periods. The present analysis of the lung infection trends before and during the COVID-19 pandemic can provide valuable insights to help develop more effective treatment protocols and preventative measures. Additionally, understanding the COVID-19 induced injury to the lungs and raising awareness about pandemic management can aid in mitigating the burden of lung infections during such pandemics.

Material and Methods

This study was conducted as a retrospective cross-sectional study in a year 2022 from January to December (1 year) in Department of Pathology, Tirunelveli Medical College, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India. The data were collected for four years between 2018 to 2021. This study was conducted in academic and for research purpose to find out the histopathological spectrum of infectious lesions in lung autopsy specimens during this pre COVID-19 and COVID-19 era. For this study, a total of 627 lung specimens were received over a four-year period from January 2018 to December 2021, irrespective of age and sex. However, 41 specimens were excluded due to autolysis and not being received in formalin, leaving 586 specimens for analysis. Among these specimens, 309 were received during the pre COVID-19 period (January 2018 to December 2019), and 277 were received during the COVID-19 period (January 2020 to December 2021).

Procedure

Out of the 586 specimens analysed, 76 were histopathologically reported as infectious lesions, including interstitial pneumonia, lobar pneumonia, granuloma, and fungal infections. Both whole organ lung specimens and portions of the lung were included in the analysis. It should be noted that all 76 cases were analysed irrespective of their COVID-19 positive status or the cause of death. Among these 76 cases, 11 were portions of the lung. Since this study is purely retrospective in nature and involves record and histopathological analysis, no interventions were made, and patient identities were kept anonymous. As a result, ethical clearance was not required for this study. All the clinical data were taken from autopsy records and hospital records. Most of the specimens were received in portion, fixed in 10% formalin. Gross examination of the specimen includes weight of the specimen, size, colour change, texture and any 8specific change with description. Routine tissue processing, paraffin block preparation, section cutting, slide staining using haematoxylin and eosin were done. After mounting slides were viewed under light microscope.

Statistical Analysis

Data was entered in Microsoft excel and analysed using open epi software. Chi-square test was used to find the association between various parameters during pre COVID-19 and COVID-19 era. Results were expressed as proportions and percentages.

Results

The study included a total of 586 specimens, out of which 309 were received during the pre COVID-19 period (January 2018 to December 2019) and 277 were received during the COVID-19 period (January 2020 to December 2021). Histopathological examination was performed on all specimens. Among these 586 specimens 76 (12.9%) were reported as infective pathology which further included 29 (38.1%) cases reported during the pre COVID-19 period, and 47 (61.9%) cases reported during the COVID-19 period. The age-wise and sex wise distribution of these lung lesions is presented in (Table/Fig 1).

During the pre COVID-19 period, the majority of the cases of infective lung pathology were observed in individuals above the age of 60 years (10 cases, 13.1%). In the COVID-19 period, the majority of cases were observed in individuals above the age of 60 years (13 cases, 17.1%) (Table/Fig 1). Among these 76 cases Interstitial pneumonia 9 (11.8%) is the most common finding in pre COVID-19 period, followed by bronchopneumonia 7 (9.2%), TB 6 (7.9%), Pneumonia with consolidation 5 (6.6%) and aspergillus infection 2 (2.6%) (Table/Fig 2).

During COVID-19 is the most common finding 17 (22.4%), followed by pneumonia with consolidation-Gross appearance and histopathology of TB depicted in [Table/Fig 3a and 3b]. The gross appearance of bronchopneumonia with patchy discolouration is depicted in (Table/Fig 4) 10 (13.2%), Interstitial pneumonia 9 (11.8%), bronchopneumonia 6 (7.9%) and aspergillus 5 (6.6%) (Table/Fig 5)

depicts the Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) examination of Lobar pneumonia while [Table/Fig:6] depicts the H&E examination of Aspergilloma. Out of the 47 cases, 26 cases were COVID-19 positive, 10 cases were COVID-19 symptomatic positive cases. For 11 cases, COVID-19 status was not specified (Table/Fig 7). The comparative analysis of baseline parameters and diagnosis of lung infections between the pre COVID-19 and COVID-19 eras reveals several key findings. Firstly, there is a significant increase in the number of pneumonia cases during the COVID-19 era compared to the pre COVID-19 era, and this increase is statistically significant with a p-value of 0.04 (Table/Fig 8). Although there is a significant difference in socio-demographic data between the pre COVID-19 and COVID-19 periods, these differences are not statistically significant. Furthermore, there is an observed increase in the percentage of Tuberculosis cases during the post COVID-19 period. However, this increase is not statistically. significant, likely due to the smaller sample size available for analysis. Similarly, the type of specimen received did not yield statistically significant differences in the present study (Table/Fig 9).

Discussion

Autopsy is the detailed and careful examination of the dead body mainly done to find out the main cause of death. Most of the times cause of death having been established during ante-mortem period itself. Histopathological examination is useful to study the disease process, which may be missed during routine gross examination thus enriching the present medical knowledge. Gross examination along with histopathology gives better diagnosis. All the previous autopsy studies of lung were generalised studies which highlighted about all histopathological spectrum of lung specimens (8),(9),(10). During the COVID-19 pandemic, developed countries conducted autopsies on deceased COVID-19 patients revealing various COVID-19 related changes that have been extensively studied. However, there is currently a dearth of specific studies exclusively focused on lung infections during the pre and post COVID-19 periods, particularly in developing countries (11). Despite the extensive research conducted on respiratory diseases and lung health in general, there is a noticeable gap in understanding the specific dynamics and impacts of lung infections in the context of the pre and post COVID-19 era, particularly within developing nations (11).

The present study represents a novel contribution as it exclusively focuses on the infectious pathology of the lungs, specifically examining the trends observed during both the pre COVID-19 and COVID-19 eras. By narrowing this research scope to infectious lung diseases, the authors here, aim to provide valuable insights into this specific aspect of respiratory health. In the study conducted by Patel CB et al., it was observed that infectious disease patterns were a prevalent finding in the histopathological diagnosis across a majority of the studies (9). The presence of infectious diseases was consistently identified as a significant contributor to lung pathology (8),(9),(10),(12). In the present study, the authors have conducted an analysis of data from previous studies focusing on the infective pathology of lung autopsy cases. In their journal article Chauhan G et al., conducted a study on 335 lung specimens (12).

Pathological lesions were observed in 285 cases, accounting for 85.1% of the total sample. In their study, pneumonia was observed in 49 cases, accounting for 14.62% of the total cases, while granulomatous (tuberculous) lesions were seen in 21 cases, representing 6.26% of the total cases (12). In the present study during the pre COVID-19 period, the authors observed pneumonia in 21 cases, with the distribution of specific types being as follows: pneumonia with consolidation in five cases (6.6%), interstitial pneumonia in nine cases (11.8%) and broncho pneumonia in seven cases (9.2%). Additionally, the authors found that TB (granuloma) was present in six cases, representing 7.9% of the total cases. In the post COVID-19 period, we observed pneumonia in 25 cases, with the distribution of specific types as follows: pneumonia with consolidation in 10 cases (13.2%), interstitial pneumonia in nine cases (11.8%), and bronchopneumonia in six cases (7.9%). Furthermore, the authors found that TB (granuloma) was present in 17 cases, accounting for 22.4% of the total cases. The present study aligns with the findings of Sumaya et al., Amin NS et al., Momin YA et al., and Amin A et al., which indicate that pneumonia followed by TB are common findings in the examined cases (13),(14),(15),(16). They reinforce the presence of pneumonia and TB as commonly observed findings within the studied population (13),(14),(15),(16). The present study findings align with these studies, underscoring the significance of pneumonia and TB as prominent manifestations of infectious diseases in the lungs. The consistent identification of TB across multiple studies highlights (13),(14),(15),(16) its significance as a common pathology within the examined cases, particularly during the COVID-19 era. Notably, there has been a drastic increase in the prevalence of TB cases, accounting for 17 cases (22.4%) in our study. Similar to the study conducted by Jain VK et al., the present study also observed an increase in TB cases (7). Several factors can account for this rise, including the effects of lockdown measures and the fear of hospital stays during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Additionally, challenges in accessing regular Outpatient Department (OPD) services, community-level TB issues, and a significant decrease in the diagnosis of new cases of active TB have contributed to the observed increase. Furthermore, deficiencies in monitoring and uninterrupted supply of anti-TB medications, affordability of personal protective equipment for healthcare workers, and the economic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic have played a role in the rise of TB cases. These multifaceted factors highlight the complex interplay between the COVID-19 pandemic and the management of TB. In the studies stated above pneumonia is the most common cause of death, thus correlating with the present study. Similar to Amin A et al., this study also revealed a significant observation regarding aspergillosis (16). The authors identified two cases (2.6%) of aspergillosis during the pre COVID-19 period and five cases (6.6%) during the COVID-19 period. Importantly, we observed an increase in the prevalence of aspergillosis during the post COVID-19 period. The increased prevalence of aspergillosis in COVID-19 patients could be attributed to the combination of diabetes and increased use of corticosteroids to combat COVID-19 infection, which increases the risk of development and aggravation of existing opportunistic fungal infections. Additionally, mechanical ventilation, catheter placement, and immunosuppressant therapies appear to play a role in the manifestation of various fungal co-infections in COVID-19 patients. The statistical analysis (Table/Fig 8) conducted in this study revealed a significant association between COVID-19 and lung infections, with a p-value of 0.04 (Threshold p-value=0.05). This finding indicates that there is a statistically significant relationship between the presence of COVID-19 and the occurrence of lung infections especially pneumonia. This significant association underscores the connection between COVID-19 and the development of lung infections. It highlights the potential impact of COVID-19 on respiratory health and the susceptibility to secondary infections. Understanding this association is crucial for effective management and prevention strategies, as it can inform clinical decisionmaking, public health measures, and interventions to minimise the risk and burden of lung infections in individuals with COVID-19.

Further research and investigation into the mechanisms and factors contributing to this association are warranted to enhance our understanding and optimise patient care outcomes. Despite significant differences in socio-demographic data between the pre COVID-19 and COVID-19 periods, these differences do not reach statistical significance, likely due to the smaller sample size employed in the study. Similarly, the type of specimen received did not yield statistically significant differences in the present study. This could also be attributed to the smaller sample size, indicating the need for a larger sample to draw more conclusive results.

Limitation(s)

In some cases, only a part of the organ was received, preventing us from providing a precise report on additional findings. Additionally, due to their compromised condition, autolysed specimens were excluded from the study. Furthermore, specimens obtained from deceased individuals of unknown identity lacked proper clinical information, significantly limiting the usability of their data in this study. However, the present analysis revealed that the specific type of specimen did not demonstrate statistical significance.

Conclusion

Pneumonia, including lobar pneumonia, interstitial pneumonia, and bronchopneumonia, is the most commonly observed histopathological lung lesion. This finding highlights the significance of lung infections as a common cause of mortality. When comparing the pre COVID-19 era to the COVID-19 era, the authors observed an increased number of infective lesions, indicating a higher burden of infectious diseases during the pandemic. A significant increase in tuberculous etiology during the COVID-19 period emphasises the importance of prevention and pre-planning during pandemics to effectively manage and prevent the surge of treatable infectious conditions. This calls for proactive measures such as early detection, proper treatment, and comprehensive public health strategies to control the spread of TB. Furthermore, the rise in opportunistic fungal infections, such as aspergillosis, necessitates specific interventions. Proper diagnosis of the pandemic, along with strict control of diabetes and monitored steroid use, plays a crucial role in preventing life-threatening infectious conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

References

1.
Corticosteroids for COVID-19 [Accessed 12 May 2023]. Available from: https:// www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-Corticosteroids-2020.1.
2.
Nair AV, Kumar D, Yadav SK, Nepal P, Jacob B, Al-Heidous M. Utility of visual coronary artery calcification on non-cardiac gated thoracic CT in predicting clinical severity and outcome in COVID-19. Clin Imaging. 2021;74:123-30. Doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.01.015. Epub 2021 Jan 18.[crossref][PubMed]
3.
Tang Y, Liu J, Zhang D, Xu Z, Ji J, Wen C. Cytokine storm in COVID-19: The current evidence and treatment strategies. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1708. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.01708. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Gangneux JP, Bougnoux ME, Dannaoui E, Cornet M, Zahar JR. Invasive fungal diseases during COVID-19: We should be prepared. J Mycol Med. 2020;30(2):100971. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Ghoshal AG, Ravindran GD, Gangal P. The burden of the segregated respiratory diseases in India and the quality of care in these patients: Results from the Asia- Pacific burden of respiratory disease study. Lung India. 2016;33(6):611-19. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Borczuk AC, Salvatore SP, Seshan SV, Patel SS, Bussel JB, Mostyka M, et al. COVID-19 pulmonary pathology: A multi-institutional autopsy cohort from Italy and New York City. Mod Pathol. 2020;33(11):2156-68. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Jain VK, Iyengar KP, Samy DA, Vaishya R. Tuberculosis in the era of COVID-19 in India. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(5):1439-43. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Khare P, Gupta R, Ahuja M, Khare N, Agarwal S, Bansal D. Prevalence of lung lesions at autopsy: A histopathological study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(5):EC13-EC16. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Patel CB, Patel K, Bhagat VM, Shah P. Pattern of histopathological lesions in lung autopsy. Int J Res Med Sci. 2018;6(1):279-83. [crossref]
10.
Dhruw D, Chikhlikar K, Nayak K, Thakur N, Singh B, Meshram A. Histopathological spectrum of lesions in lungs on post-mortem specimen in a tertiary centre of bastar region-a retrospective study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2020;14(9):EC05-EC06. [crossref]
11.
Kurawar RR, Vasaikar MS. Spectrum of histomorphological changes in lungs at autopsy: A 5-year study. Ann Pathol Lab Med. 2017;4(1):A106-12. [crossref]
12.
Chauhan G, Agrawal M, Thakkar N, Parghi B. Spectrum of histopathological lesions in lung autopsy. J Res Med Den Sci. 2015;3(2):109-12. [crossref]
13.
Sumaya, Aruna S, Gurudut KS, Kittur SK. Histomorphological pattern analysis of lung autopsies in a tertiary care hospital. Indian J Pathol Oncol. 2020;7(2):279-84. [crossref]
14.
Amin NS, Shah PY, Patel RG, Khant VS, Prajapati SG. Histopathological alterations in lung tissue received as autopsy specimens-A study of 410 cases. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2017;6:327-30. https://www.bibliomed.org/ mnsfulltext/67/67-1471374433.pdf?1690454396. [crossref]
15.
Momin YA, Patil D, Suladhal SS. Histopathological study of lung lesions in autopsy cases. International Journal of Scientific Research. 2018;7(12):34-37.
16.
Amin A, Vartanian A, Poladian N, Voloshko A, Yegiazaryan A, Al-Kassir AL, et al. Root causes of fungal coinfections in COVID-19 infected patients. Infect Dis Rep. 2021;13(4):1018-35.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63723.18258

Date of Submission: Mar 08, 2023
Date of Peer Review: May 06, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jun 30, 2023
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 13, 2023
• Manual Googling: Jun 19, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jun 27, 2023 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com