Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 47941

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2023 | Month : July | Volume : 17 | Issue : 7 | Page : SR01 - SR03 Full Version

Neonatal Dengue- A Case Series


Published: July 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/62508.18105
Priya Margaret Alen, M Renumaheswari, MG Ravanagomagan, Ramitha Enakshi Kumar

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Senior Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Undergraduate Student, Omandurar Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
MG Ravanagomagan,
G-4, R Block, SBMCH, No. 7, CLC Works Road, Chrompet, Chennai-600044, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: drmgr04@gmail.com

Abstract

Dengue is one of the commonest arboviral infections seen in children but in neonates, it is a disregarded entity. It can be acquired either through vertical (transplacental) or horizontal transmission (mosquito bite). It usually presents with fever, lethargy, poor feeding, and thrombocytopenia which can be accompanied by hepatosplenomegaly, transaminitis, fluid leak, petechiae, bleeding, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), shock and Acute Kidney Injury (AKI). Dengue shock in neonates responds well to dopamine if used early. A retrospective review of case records of five neonates admitted with dengue fever from October 2021 to October 2022 showed the neonates average age was 10 days and male:female ratio of 3:2. Three cases had horizontal and two cases had vertical transmission. All neonates presented with fever and were admitted within one week of illness. Petechial rashes and refusal of feeds were observed in two cases. Four cases had leukopenia whereas, all cases had thrombocytopenia. Sepsis was ruled out. Dengue Nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) antigen was positive in four cases. Immunoglobulin GM (IgM) antibody was positive in all while Immunoglobulin G (IgG) was negative in all cases. None of the cases had hepatic derangement except for mild transaminitis in three cases. Only two cases had severe thrombocytopenia requiring platelet transfusion, but none developed bleeding, plasma leakage, shock requiring inotropes or fluid overload. Mortality due to neonatal dengue was nil and the duration of hospital stay ranged between 6-12 days. In the vertically transmitted cases, isolation of the virus from the breast milk or cord blood was not done due to logistics. Therefore, dengue fever can be suspected as one of the differentials in any neonate presenting with fever, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia mimicking sepsis, especially during the epidemic season.

Keywords

Leukopenia, Sepsis, Thrombocytopenia, Transaminitis

Dengue fever is caused by a flavivirus belonging to the flaviviridae family (1). Aedes aegypti a day-biting mosquito is the vector that carries the flavivirus. World Health Organisation (WHO) defines dengue infection as an acute febrile illness with two or more of the following signs and symptoms like retro-orbital pain, severe headache, arthralgia, myalgia, haemorrhagic manifestations, leukopenia, and skin rash. Earlier dengue was an infection of children, but now even adults including pregnant women are infected by the dengue virus. The routes of dengue infection are by mosquito bites, maternal-foetal, mucocutaneous and by blood (1).

Dengue infection in the mother can cause severe complications like preterm delivery, low birth weight, miscarriage, and perinatal death. If the mother is affected late in pregnancy, the neonate can develop dengue infection (2),(3). With the emergence of dengue fever as an epidemic, more and more pregnant women are affected by the disease. Secondary dengue is said to be more serious and dangerous than primary dengue. If a pregnant mother gets dengue fever in the latter half of pregnancy and delivers during the febrile phase where viraemia is highest, both, mother and neonate can get severe dengue with life-threatening complications even with the primary infection (4). The present case series presents five cases of neonatal dengue in a span of one year duration (Table/Fig 1).

Case Report

Case 1

A 7-year-old boy was referred to the Paediatric Department of Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chrompet, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India from outside with complaints of fever, cough, headache and vomiting for three days. On admission, he was afebrile with a heart rate of 105/minute and blood pressure of 98/60 mmHg. He had leukopenia, thrombocytopenia with a platelet count of 55000 cells/cumm and normal haemoglobin. NS1 antigen and dengue IgM antibody was positive and he was diagnosed for dengue fever. He was treated with intravenous fluids and paracetamol following which he recovered. On follow-up, he was afebrile with normal blood counts. His sister an eight-day-old female infant, also had fever since three days. She was born from non consanguineous marriage by Lower Segment Caesarean Section (LSCS) with an Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, and Respiration (APGAR) score of nine in one minute. On examination, she was febrile (100º F), her peripheral pulses were well felt, capillary refill time was less than two seconds. Petechial rashes were seen on her body. Laboratory examination showed low platelet count (87000 cells/cumm), low total leukocyte count (2000 cells/cumm), and elevated Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) (447 unit/L) and Serum Glutamic-oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) (1023 unit/L). Blood culture was sterile and cranial Ultrasonography (USG) did not show any intracranial haemorrhage. She was tested for NS1 antigen and dengue IgM that came out to be positive (Table/Fig 1). A diagnosis of neonatal dengue fever was made. Prophylactic antibiotics namely ampicillin (50 mg/kg/dose, 12 hourly) and gentamycin (4 mg/kg/day) were given for neonatal sepsis. Platelet count dropped to 66000 on day 3. Antibiotics were stopped on fifth day and cultures were negative. Platelet count was checked everyday. On fifth day, platelet counts were increased to 100000 and liver enzymes started decreasing. She was discharged on the seventh day with weight of 3.2 kg. Follow-up period after five days was uneventful with no fever or rashes.

Case 2

A 15-day-old neonate girl, brought with complaints of fever since four days, rashes over the body and refusal of feeds since one day. Born out of non consanguineous marriage by LSCS with APGAR scores 8/10, 9/10 in one and five minutes, respectively and birth weight of 2.75 kg. Her mother was also admitted to the Medicine Department and was diagnosed with dengue and on treatment. Keeping this in mind, the baseline investigations from the neonate was done that showed (leukopenia 4500 cells/cumm), thrombocytopenia (95,000 cells/cumm), and normal haemoglobin. Blood culture was negative for any growth. She was kept on antibiotics and other supportive measures. Dengue NS1 antigen and IgM antibody was positive. Baby was treated symptomatically with antipyretics, intravenous fluids and discharged on the 10th day of admission without any complications.

Case 3

A 24-day-old inborn, term boy baby came with complaints of fever abdominal distension for the past six days. Baby born out of non consanguineous marriage by LSCS with APGAR scores 8/10, 9/10 in one and five minutes, respectively and birth weight of 3.1 kg. Child was exclusively on breastfeeds and there was no history of bad child rearing practices. Family history revealed that, grandmother was admitted two days before and was diagnosed with dengue. She was under treatment. On examination, the baby had fever (101.3º F), no petechiae, or bleeding manifestations was observed. The baseline investigations showed leukopenia (3700 cell/cumm), thrombocytopenia (83,000 cells/cumm), normal haemoglobin level. Blood culture showed no growth of organisms. USG abdomen showed moderate ascites. Dengue NS1 antigen and IgM antibody was positive (Table/Fig 1). Baby was treated symptomatically with antipyretics and intravenous fluids. Serial ultrasound was done and found to be normal also thrombocytopenia gradually returned to normal range at the end and baby was discharged on the 12th day of admission. Follow-up period after five days of discharge was uneventful baby was alert, active, and feeding well with adequate weight gain.

Case 4

A one-day-old male neonate was admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) with fever at eight hours of life. The child was born to a primigravida mother at 38 weeks of gestation by a normal vaginal delivery with a birth weight of about 3.2 kg. The neonate cried at birth, started on direct breastfeeds within an hour of birth. The child was well, till eight hours of life but then started to have a fever with a temperature of about 38° C following which he was transferred to NICU. Family history revealed, mother also had fever for four days, was positive for dengue NS1 antigen, IgM, and IgG antibodies, and was on treatment. Child had normal vitals and normal skin perfusion. General and systemic examinations were unremarkable except a few petechiae on his face. Child was empirically started on antibiotics ampicillin (50 mg/kg/dose 12 hourly) and gentamycin (4 mg/kg/day). The blood culture was negative for any growth. Dengue IgM antibody came out to be positive (Table/Fig 1). The child had fever for about four days, following which he entered the critical phase. Laboratory investigations showed normal White Blood Cells (WBC) count with thrombocytopenia (98,000/mm3) at the time of admission and platelet count was, as low as, 11,000/mm on day six of illness. Platelet transfusions and supportive management with intravenous fluids was provided. Except for a mild transaminitis, child did not have any complications. The child had defervescence on day seven then, he started to become alert and active. He was discharged after 10 days of admission. On follow-up after five days, child was active, feeding well and repeat investigations showed normal WBC and platelet counts (2,82,000/mm3).

Case 5

A two-day-old female neonate, who was delivered in the same hospital had developed fever. The baby had a birth weight of 2.9 kg with reassuring APGAR scores. She was born by vaginal delivery to a second gravida mother with a history of dengue fever at 39 weeks of pregnancy and was in recovery phase of illness. Baby had fever of about 37.9° C on day 2 of life, hence, child was empirically started on antibiotics ampicillin (50 mg/kg/dose 12 hourly) and gentamycin (4 mg/kg/day). Blood culture was negative for any growth. Chills was also evaluated for dengue NS1 antigen which was positive. However, dengue IgM and IgG antibody tests were negative (Table/Fig 1). On day 5 of illness, baby entered the critical phase wherein, the neonate had refusal of feeds and lethargy and subsequently started on intravenous fluids. Petechial lesions were also noted. Platelet count was, as low as, 10,000/mm for which platelet transfusion (10 mL/kg) was provided. Followed which baby recovered well and was discharged on day 9 of life. On follow-up after five days, child was afebrile, alert, feeding well, no petechial rashes and repeat investigations showed normal WBC and platelet counts.

Discussion

Dengue is a viral infection which affects people in endemic areas annually (5). Neonatal dengue, most of the time is underdiagnosed, because it mimics neonatal sepsis and also due to less suspicion. Severe dengue is due to secondary heterotypic infections or primary infection in infants born from Dengue Virus (DENV)-immune mothers, due to Antibody-dependent Enhancement of infection (ADE) (6). In the present case series, five cases of neonatal dengue are presented out of which, two cases had vertical transmission and three cases had horizontal transmission of dengue. The clinical course of dengue has three phases namely, febrile phase which lasts for about 2-7 days followed by critical phase ranging between 48-72 hours and finally, a convalescent phase of about 3-4 days. All the neonates presented within one week of illness during their febrile phase. The mean age of presentation was 10 days. Male to female ratio was 3:2. Petechial rashes and refusal of feeds were observed in two cases. Diagnosis of dengue fever can be done by using dengue virus isolation, virus nucleic acid detection, detection of NS1 antigen, or by detection of antibodies. Dengue virus isolation and virus nucleic acid detection are usually not preferred as they are time consuming and expensive (5). In the present case series, four cases had leukopenia, and all of them had thrombocytopenia. Dengue NS1 antigen was positive in four cases, whereas, dengue IgM was positive in all cases. Surprisingly, all cases were found out to be negative for dengue IgG antibody, which can be explained as primary dengue infection. Neurosonogram did not reveal any bleeding despite low platelet counts. Sepsis screen including blood culture was negative in all cases.

Among the three vertically acquired dengue cases, all mothers had dengue NS1 antigen and IgG antibody positivity whereas, only 1 (33%) mother had dengue IgM positivity. Pregnant mothers can transmit the infection to the foetus if, she develops a fever 10 days prior to delivery to 10 hours post delivery. Intrauterine transmission is high, especially when the mother is in febrile phase as viraemia is observed highest in the febrile phase. The transmission is unaffected by the mode of delivery (6). All neonates had a smooth hospital stay without any serious complications like shock requiring inotropes, severe plasma leakage and bleeding manifestations. According to literature review, newborns with low birth weight have a higher risk of getting severe forms of dengue (7). In the present case series, all the neonates were term babies with normal birth weight. None of the cases had hepatic derangement except for mild transaminitis, which was observed in three cases. Only two cases had severe thrombocytopenia requiring platelet transfusion but, they did not develop any bleeding manifestations. Bleeding is due to mature immune system and repeated infections with various serotypes as seen in older children and adults (8). Although, neonates are one of the vulnerable groups, the lesser incidence of complications could be explained due to their immunological immaturity and also due to decreased production of mediators like Interleukin-1 (IL-1) 1 beta, IL-6 and tumour necrosis factor alpha by the neonate (9).

In the present case series, no newborn developed dengue shock syndrome, which is in contradiction to a study done by Pachauri A et al., where a neonate developed dengue shock syndrome on day three of life with a good outcome (8). Age appears to be one of the most common epidemiological risk factors in dengue as the case fatality rate is higher in children compared to adults (10),(11). However, in the present case series, mortality due to neonatal dengue was nil and all cases recovered well. The duration of hospital stay ranged between 6-12 days with a mean duration of about nine days which is in contrast to the study done by Dalugama C et al., where they reported a longer hospital stay (12). This could be explained as all the neonates were of term gestation and none of them had severe complications like shock requiring inotropes, fluid overload and organ failure. Maternal deaths were reported in 6%-18% of pregnant dengue patients in a study done by Machain-Williams C et al., whereas, in the present case series, there were no maternal death (13). Reduced maternal death is due to the early diagnosis and management, as well as, prompt referral of sick mothers to a tertiary care centre for appropriate management. Supportive management like judicious use of fluids, inotropes and blood products, if required remains the main stay of treatment.

Conclusion

It is recommended to suspect dengue fever in any neonate presenting with fever, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia mimicking sepsis, especially during the epidemic season. Dengue serology should be done in both, the mother and child for early diagnosis and treatment. Neonate should be thoroughly evaluated for any serious complication and should be vigilantly monitored, till their second week of life, before discharging them.

References

1.
Gibbons RV, Vaughn DW. Dengue: An escalating problem. BMJ. 2002;324:1563-66. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Clyde K, Kyle JL, Harris E. Recent advances in deciphering viral and host determinants of dengue virus replication and pathogenesis. J Virol. 2006;80:11418-31. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Choudhry SP, Gupta RK, Kishan J. Dengue shock syndrome in newborn: A case series. Indian Pediatr. 2004;41:397-99.
4.
Carroll ID, Toovey S, Van Gompel A. Dengue fever and pregnancy-A review and comment. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2007;5:183-88. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Dutra NR, de Paula MB, de Oliveira MD, de Oliveira LL, De Paula SO. The laboratorial diagnosis of dengue: Applications and implications. Journal of Global Infectious Diseases. 2009;1(1):38. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Bhattari CD, Yadav BK, Basnet R, Karki M, Chauhan S. Dengue fever in a neonate: A case report. Journal of the Nepal Medical Association. 2023;61(259). [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Watanabe S, Vasudevan SG. Clinical and experimental evidence for transplacental vertical transmission of flaviviruses. Antiviral Research. 2023;210:105512. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Pachauri A, Tripathi S, Kumar M. Perinatal transmission of dengue infection in a neonate presenting as dengue shock syndrome. Journal of Neonatology. 2023:09732179231151746. [crossref]
9.
Halstead SB, Lan NT, Myint TT, Shwe TN, Nisalak A, Kalyanarooj S, et al. Dengue hemorrhagicfever in infants: Research opportunities ignored. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:1474-79. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Thaithumyanon P, Thisyakorn U, Deerojnawong J, Innis BL. Dengue infection complicated by severe hemorrhage and vertical transmission in a parturient woman. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;18:248-49. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Chye JK, Lim CT, Ng KB, Lim JM, George R, Lam SK. Vertical transmission of dengue. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25:1374-77. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Dalugama C, Medagama A, Wickramasinghe A, Priyankara S, Bowatte G. Retrospective comparative study on maternal, foetal, and neonatal outcomes of symptomatic dengue infection: A study in Teaching Hospital, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka Journal of Child Health. 2023;52(1):39-44. [crossref]
13.
Machain-Williams C, Raqqga E, BaakBaak CM, Kiem S, Blitvich BJ, Ramos C. Maternal, foetal, and neonatal outcomes in pregnant dengue patients in Mexico. Biomed Research International. 2018;2018:9643083.[crossref][PubMed]

Tables and Figures
[Table / Fig - 1]
DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/62508.18105

Date of Submission: Jan 01, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Mar 30, 2023
Date of Acceptance: May 22, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 04, 2023
• Manual Googling: Apr 13, 2023
• iThenticate Software: May 20, 2023 (4%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com