Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 38257

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : July | Volume : 17 | Issue : 7 | Page : RC05 - RC09 Full Version

Prediction of Semitendinosus Graft Length and Girth using Anthropometric Parameters: A Prospective Study in North Kerala Population


Published: July 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/63132.18133
Jipin Gopi, Mahesh Anil, Krishna Prabhash, Aarabhy Jayan

1. Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Malabar Medical College and Research Centre, Calicut, Kerala, India. 2. Junior Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Malabar Medical College and Research Centre, Calicut, Kerala, India. 3. Junior Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Malabar Medical College and Research Centre, Calicut, Kerala, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Konni, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Aarabhy Jayan,
Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Konni, Pathanamthitta-689691, Kerala, India.
E-mail: aarabhy@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Semitendinosus, Gracilis and Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone (BPTB) graft are the most popular grafts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Although bone-to-bone patellar tendon grafting improves knee stability and healing rates, there are drawbacks, including donor site morbidity, patellar tendinopathy, anterior knee pain, flexion contracture, and patellar fracture. The advantages of semitendinosus graft include preservation of bone stock, the ability to triple graft length when needed, and the ability to take Gracilis graft through the same incision, if graft diameter is too small.

Aim: To predict the semitendinosus graft length and diameter using anthropometric parameters (height, weight, Body Mass Index (BMI), waist circumference, thigh circumference and thigh length).

Materials and Methods: This prospective descriptive study was conducted in the Department of Orthopaedics, Malabar Medical College, Calicut, Kerala, India for a period of one year (from October 2021 to October 2022). A total of 50 patients in the age group 15-60 years with ACL insufficiency planned for hamstring autograft reconstruction were examined. A number of preoperative factors, including age, gender, height, weight, BMI, thigh length, thigh circumference and waist circumference were assessed. A 2-tailed test and Pearson’s correlation was used to identify relationships between outcome variables (semitendinosus graft length and quadrupled tendon diameter) and predictor variables (age, gender, height, weight, BMI, thigh length, thigh circumference and waist circumference).

Results: A total of 32% of patients had a semitendinosus graft diameter ≥8 mm, while 68% were <8 mm. Compared to males, females had a lower body weight and height and their hamstring grafts were shorter with smaller diameter. Correlation analysis indicated that there was a significant positive relation between height and weight on graft length and diameter (p<0.005).

Conclusion: The study concluded that both hamstring diameter and length was related to height and weight of the person. Patients who were taller and heavier might be anticipated to have grafts with longer length and larger diameter. Also, thigh and waist parameters had no impact on hamstring tendon size.

Keywords

Anterior cruciate ligament, Bone-patellar tendon-bone graft, Hamstring graft

For the reconstruction of the ACL, there are numerous graft choices available, including BPTB autograft, quadriceps tendon autograft, hamstring tendon autograft and various allograft sources. Prior to clinical use, it is important to weigh the pros and cons of each option. Hamstring graft usage has increased because of clinical studies showing comparable outcomes to BPTB reconstruction, less donor site morbidity, and better fixing techniques (1). Other soft tissue reconstructions, that include extra-articular surgeries performed around the knee, elbow, and ankle, have shown to be effective when using hamstring tendon autograft (2),(3). The capacity to identify patients with hamstring tendons of inadequate length or diameter becomes essential as the usage of autograft hamstring tendons rises. To plan for alternate graft sources (such as patellar tendon autograft, quadriceps tendon, or other allograft sources) and to properly counsel patients on graft selection, it is necessary to identify these at-risk patients (4).

One of the excellent options for ACL reconstruction is semitendinosus graft. The muscle is named so, because its lower half is tendinous. The muscle takes origin from lower medial part of upper quadrilateral area of ischial tuberosity and is inserted into the upper part of medial surface of tibia. Supplied by tibial part of sciatic nerve it acts as a knee flexor and weak hip extensor along with other hamstring muscles (5). Most used graft for ACL reconstruction is semitendinosus with or without gracilis and BPTB graft. Though, knee stability and healing rate is better with BPTB graft, it is associated with complication like donor site morbidity, knee extension stiffness, patellar tendinopathy, anterior knee pain, flexion contracture and patellar fracture. Semitendinosus graft have advantages like conservation of bone stock, when length of graft is insufficient with semitendinosus graft, it could be quadrupled or if diameter of graft is less, gracilis graft can also be taken through same incision (6). Double bundle technique or quadrupled bundle technique may be applied using this tendon as a graft. Graft rupture and risk of failure is increased with the use of small diameter grafts (7). The graft is harvested through a vertical para median incision at the level of tibial tubercle after exposing sartorial fascia through an ‘L’ shaped incision. Graft is harvested with the use of tendon stripper (8). Gracilis tendons or doubled semitendinosus or even their combination has enough strength to replace the strength of an ACL. Collagen content is also more in hamstring tendons than in a BPTB graft. The quadruple hamstring tendon has a maximum strength of 1160 N, while the middle third of the 10 mm wide patellar ligament has a maximum strength of 1080 N. The triple hamstring tendon can be upto 250% stronger than a healthy ACL in laboratory settings (9).

In a study by Tuman JM et al., anthropometric information was used as a predictor of hamstring diameter and discovered that older, shorter, female patients were more likely to have a graft with an inadequate diameter. Following analysis of the data, the regression equation shown below was obtained from a moderate correlation between transplant diameter and patient height: Graft diameter=2.4±0.03×height in cm (10). Weight, BMI, self-reported height, and graft diameters were used in the study.

A study by Chiba D et al., hypothesised that further defining criteria predicting graft dimensions would need prospective study of these same values along with direct patient height measurement, the addition of thigh length and thigh circumference, and intraoperative assessment of hamstring lengths. They then used recent prospective data to verify the accuracy of the previously calculated regression equation in their latest literature (11). Height, weight, BMI, waist circumference, thigh circumference and thigh length were used as anthropometric parameters for predicting graft size in the study. Not many studies have been conducted in Kerala, especially in North Malabar region regarding the same. Literature review suggests that graft smaller than 7 mm diameter have increased risk of failure (4). It is essential to establish a minimum tendon length of 32 cm in order to ensure the ideal quadrupled hamstring graft length of 8 cm and 7 mm thickness (2 cm in the femoral tunnel, 4 cm intra-articular, and 2 cm in the tibial tunnel). The risk of obtaining a graft with a smaller diameter is one of the drawbacks of taking hamstring autograft. When such a situation arises during surgery, the surgeon might need to proceed with a different graft source and fixation method. Therefore, preoperative prediction of the thickness of the hamstring graft is crucial for the surgeon to arrange alternative fixation methods or graft choices (12). Hence, it was decided to conduct a study for preoperative prediction of graft size so that operating surgeons will not face intraoperative difficulty because of smaller graft size.

The hypothesis was that the length and diameter of hamstring grafts and semitendinosus grafts used for ACL reconstruction can be predicted using clinically quantifiable anthropometric measurements.

Material and Methods

A prospective descriptive study was conducted in the Department of Orthopaedics, Malabar Medical College, Calicut, Kerala, India for a period of one year (from October 2021 to October 2022). A total of 50 consecutive patients with ACL insufficiency who underwent hamstring autograft reconstruction were examined. The study was approved from the Institution Ethical board with ethical clearance no: MMCH&RC/IEC/2021. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Inclusion criteria: All patients of the age group 15-60 years with clinico-radiologically confirmed ACL tear undergoing ACL reconstruction using semitendinosus graft were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with preoperative hamstring weakness (neuromuscular disorders), acute tear (<4 weeks), multiligamentous knee injury, associated bony injury, prior ACL reconstruction of the same limb, septic arthritis were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: Sample size was calculated by hosmer and lameshow method (13).

n=(z/?)2×p×(1-p).

Using this test, sample size obtained was 50.

Study Procedure

Several preoperative factors, namely age, gender, height, weight, BMI, thigh length, thigh circumference and waist circumference were included. The thigh length was measured from Anterior Superior Iliac Spine (ASIS) to the Medial Joint Line (MJL) and the thigh circumference from 15 cm above superior pole of patella. Surgical operation was performed by a single surgeon in all cases. All hamstring tendon autografts (semitendinosus) were extracted in the same way. An oblique incision was made on the skin over the pes-anserinus insertion site on proximal tibia and subcutaneous fat was incised (Table/Fig 1). Incision of the sartorius fascia was made parallel to the direction of semitendinosus tendon. Semitendinosus tendon was dissected. Proximal attachment of the tendon was 6removed with a close tendon stripper (Table/Fig 2). In order to preserve maximum length, the detachment of the tendon was done close to the bone on its tibial end. Graft preparation was done (Table/Fig 3). Intraoperatively absolute length of semitendinosus graft and diameter of quadrupled tendon was measured using 1 mm calibrated scale (Table/Fig 4),(Table/Fig 5) and sizing cylinders with incremental size change of 0.5 mm (Table/Fig 6) (11).

Statistical Analysis

Single 2-tailed test and Pearson’s correlation were used to identify relationships among anthropometric data and intraoperatively measured hamstring graft measurements using International Business Machines (IBM) Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0. Multiple linear regressions were used to calculate regression coefficients to determine variance explained between clinical predictor variables and outcome variables, that is, semitendinosus-graft length and diameter. Statistical results were considered significant at p≤0.05.

Results

The demographic and predictor variables is shown in (Table/Fig 7). Distribution of gender, side involvement and size of semitendinosus is shown in (Table/Fig 8). A 2-tailed test and Pearson’s coefficient correlation analysis indicated a significant positive relation between height and weight on graft length and diameter (p<0.005) (Table/Fig 9). Taller or heavier the patient, thicker was the tripled hamstring graft. However, gender, BMI, thigh length, thigh circumference and waist circumference did not correlate with graft length and thickness. Rule of thumb for interpreting size of a correlation coefficient has been provided in (Table/Fig 10). Compared to males, females had a lower body weight and height and their hamstring grafts were shorter with smaller diameter.

Discussion

The findings of the present study confirm the hypothesis that the length and diameter of semitendinosus grafts used for ACL reconstruction can be predicted using clinically quantifiable anthropometric parameters. It appears that height and weight are the best predictors for ST graft diameter. Even while hamstring grafts are still a common option for ACL restoration, the graft size requirements for a positive clinical outcome are still not well understood. In a biomechanical investigation, Hamner et al., showed that the number of tendon strands included in the graft increased the strength and stiffness of equally tensioned hamstring tendons (14). These results show that the diameter of the graft influences the biomechanical characteristics of hamstring transplants (11). Additionally, Grood et al., showed that anterior tibial translation had an inverse association with graft diameter in an animal model (15). Clinical trials have not linked graft size to final knee stability, range of motion, or patient satisfaction, despite biomechanical data demonstrating that larger graft diameter leads in a stronger and stiffer construct.

The dimensions of the hamstring graft, which were measured and recorded at the time of the procedure, were compared to all anthropometric measurements that had been taken. These techniques enhanced the precision of hamstring size estimation and allowed for the study of numerous other characteristics. Both the diameter and length of the tendon could be measured. In the Western literature, the mean sizes of hamstring grafts range from 7.9 to 8.6 mm, and the results of this study showed the mean hamstring graft diameter as 8.03 mm. Most of the Western literature showed height as the best predictor among anthropometric data in hamstring graft size (4).

According to a study by Xie G et al., among Chinese Han population, a significant correlation was obtained between weight, height, and BMI of patients with the length and diameter of semitendinosus and gracilis grafts (16). In contrast to the studies by Tuman JM et al., and Pinheiro LF et al., who established that BMI has no influence on graft diameter (10),(17). Treme G et al., in their study found a positive effect of BMI on graft diameter (11). Pinheiro LF et al., in their study found that weight had less influence in graft diameter contrary to the study by Treme G et al. who observed the highest correlation with weight (11),(17). Finally in a study of 119 patients, Schwatzberg et al. observed moderate correlation between graft diameter and weight (18).

Pinheiro LF et al., in a study of 80 patients concluded that height is the most important variable that affects graft length the most (17). Treme G et al., noted that hamstring tendon lengths had strong correlation with height and leg length (11). In a study of 100 patients, Chiang ER et al., concluded that the patient’s height is a predictor of both semitendinosus and Gracilis tendon lengths in Chinese population (19). Height was found to be the most important variable, mainly in women according to the study by Tuman JM et al., (10). Weak correlation to height was seen in the study done by Schwatzberg et al., (18).

Both hamstring diameter and length were found to be related to height and weight of the person. The results showed that patients who were taller and heavier, were anticipated to have grafts with longer length and larger diameter. It was interesting to note that neither waist circumference nor thigh length or circumference correlated to graft dimensions, indicating that thigh and waist parameters had no impact on hamstring tendon size. These results confirmed the study theory that hamstring measurements may be predicted using simple anthropometric measurements. The magnitude of the connections among the available data suggested that patient height followed by weight was the strongest predictor of graft diameter.

The need of predicting semitendinosus dimensions is highlighted by the usefulness of this tissue as a graft option. ACL reconstruction using quadrupled graft is its most popular application. In addition, some surgeons repair the ACL using a tripled semitendinosus graft. Both situations call for grafts that are the right length and diameter. Second, the significance of graft selection and size criteria have increased remarkably for preoperative planning because of increased research into double-bundle reconstruction and the development of new operating procedures. Finally, for additional periarticular reconstructive surgeries, hamstring tendons have proven to be a successful transplant option. Collateral ligament and posterolateral corner reconstruction in the knee have long utilised hamstring tendon grafts. Hamstring tendons are frequently used as grafts in reconstructive procedures for the elbow and ankle. The capacity of the surgeon to anticipate graft size and recognise patients who might have a tiny or insufficient graft will be more crucial as reconstructive procedures continue to advance (11).

The study had several merits. Firstly, the study was one of few that assessed the preoperative and intraoperative measurements in a practical environment. Secondly, since all surgeries were performed by a single surgeon at a single institute, there was the little chance for interobserver bias. It was noteworthy to mention that all the measurements were done in recommended standards and documentation was done with utmost care. This study strengthens the conclusions of earlier, nationally, and internationally published studies and describes the need of calculating hamstring graft size preoperatively.

Further research is needed to identify the physical characteristics of people with quadrupled hamstring graft diameters of <8 mm, in order to identify the clinical parameters that may be most predictive of this patient population. Identifying patients at a high-risk for having insufficient graft diameters by using a combination of anthropometric measurements and considering various relationships among clinical and operative data was taken into account. If the harvested hamstring graft is found to be insufficient for ACL reconstruction or other reconstructive procedures that use the patient’s hamstring tendons as grafts, the surgeon can make plans for a second graft option, thanks to the current data.

Limitation(s)

If more patients were added, the anthropometric data may alter, and connections may not hold true at the extremes of the data continuum. For instance, the relationship between hamstring tendon diameter and weight in this study may not hold true if patients with extremely high weight were assessed. Other demerits included, small sample size, presence of confounders (like activity level, occupation, growth pattern, nutrition) etc., must have been considered when assessing the results. The ability to generalise the findings may be constrained because of small sample size who underwent surgery at a single facility, by a single surgeon.

Conclusion

The findings of this study suggest that since shorter, lighter patients are more likely to yield a smaller graft, discussions about graft choice are crucial when considering ACL reconstruction in these patients. Height followed by weight of the patient has repeatedly shown to be of significance in predicting hamstring graft thickness. Patients at high-risk of having a quadrupled hamstring graft diameter <8 mm are those who weigh <62.5 kg and are shorter than 168.3 cm in height. It is not common for hamstring grafts to be <8 mm in diameter, and it is still challenging to identify these patients.

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge Dr. MK Ravindran, Dr. AN Sadanandan, Dr. Jawahar Adi Raja and Dr. Rijesh P for their immense support in conducting the present study.

References

1.
Macaulay AA, Perfetti DC, Levine WN. Anterior cruciate ligament graft choices. Sports Health. 2012;4(1):63-68. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Cody EA, Karnovsky SC, DeSandis B, Tychanski Papson A, Deland JT, Drakos MC. Hamstring autograft for foot and ankle applications. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(2):189-95. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Morgan RJ, Starman JS, Habet NA, Peindl RD, Bankston LS Jr, D’Alessandro DD, et al. A biomechanical evaluation of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using a novel technique for ulnar-sided fixation. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(7):1448-55. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Challa S, Satyaprasad J. Hamstring graft size and anthropometry in South Indian population. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2013;4(3):135-38. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Rodgers CD, Raja A. Anatomy, Bony Pelvis and Lower Limb, Hamstring Muscle. 2022 Jan 29. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan. PMID: 31536294.
6.
Thaunat M, Fayard JM, Sonnery-Cottet B. Hamstring tendons or bone-patellar tendon-bone graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;105(1S):S89-S94. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Kern M, Love D, Cotter EJ, Postma W. Quadruple-bundle semitendinosus-gracilis graft technique for all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc Tech. 2016;5(6):e1317-20. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Alomar AZ, Nasser ASB, Kumar A, Kumar M, Das S, Mittal S. Hamstring graft diameter above 7 mm has a lower risk of failure following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022;30(1):288-97. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Biuk E, Zelic´ Z, Rapan S, C´ uric´ G, Biuk D, Radic´ R. Analysis of biomechanical properties of patellar ligament graft and quadruple hamstring tendon graft. Injury. 2015;46(Suppl6):S14-17. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Goyal S, Matias N, Pandey V, Acharya K. Are pre-operative anthropometric parameters helpful in predicting length and thickness of quadrupled hamstring graft for ACL reconstruction in adults? A prospective study and literature review. Int Orthop. 2016;40(1):173-81. [crossref]. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Chiba D, Tsuda E, Sasaki S, Liu X, Ishibashi Y. Anthropometric and skeletal parameters predict 2-strand semitendinosus tendon size in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(8):2325967117720148. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Papastergiou SG, Konstantinidis GA, Natsis K, Papathanasiou E, Koukoulias N, Papadopoulos AG. Adequacy of semitendinosus tendon alone for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft and prediction of hamstring graft size by evaluating simple anthropometric parameters. Anat Res Int. 2012;2012:424158.[crossref][PubMed]
13.
Asmussen CAP, Attrup ML, Thorborg K, Hölmich P. Passive knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the endobutton or toggle loc with zip loop as a femoral fixation device: A comparison of 1654 patients from the Danish knee ligament reconstruction registry. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018;6(6):2325967118778507. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Silva EMBD, Albano MB, Alberti HAA, Pereira Filho FA, Namba MM, Silva JLVD, et al. Knee ligament injuries: Biomechanics comparative study of two suture technique in tendon-analysis “in vitro” tendon of bovine. Rev Bras Ortop. 2013;48(1):80-86. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Wang HM, Shultz SJ, Schmitz RJ. Association of anterior cruciate ligament width with anterior knee laxity. J Athl Train. 2016;51(6):460-65. [crossref]. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Xie G, Huangfu X, Zhao J. Prediction of the graft size of 4-stranded semitendinosus tendon and 4-stranded gracilis tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A Chinese Han patient study. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(5):1161-66. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Pinheiro LF, de Andrade MA, Teixeira LE, Bicalho LA, Lemos WG, Azeredo SA, et al. Intra-operative four-stranded hamstring tendon graft diameter evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(5):811-15. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Pereira RN, Karam FC, Schwanke RL, Millman R, Foletto ZM, Schwanke CH. Correlation between anthropometric data and length and thickness of the tendons of the semitendinosus and gracilis muscles used for grafts in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Rev Bras Ortop. 2016;51(2):175-80. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Chiang ER, Ma HL, Wang ST, Hung SC, Liu CL, Chen TH. Hamstring graft sizes differ between Chinese and Caucasians. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;20(5):916-21.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63132.18133

Date of Submission: Jan 28, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Mar 02, 2023
Date of Acceptance: May 15, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 02, 2023
• Manual Googling: May 23, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jun 08, 2023 (11%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com