Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 45977

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2023 | Month : July | Volume : 17 | Issue : 7 | Page : OD04 - OD06 Full Version

Co-existence of Obstructive and Septic Shock in a Patient Identified by Point of Care Ultrasonography: A Case Report


Published: July 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/63387.18110
Sadananda Barik, Nishit Kumar Sahoo, Satyabrata Guru, Ajitesh Sahu, Upendra Hansda

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Trauma and Emergency Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 2. Junior Resident, Department of Trauma and Emergency Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Trauma and Emergency Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Trauma and Emergency Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 5. Associate Professor, Department of Trauma and Emergency Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Correspondence Address :
Sadananda Barik,
I-O51, Cosmopolis Apartment, Khandagiri, Bhubaneswar-751019, Odisha, India.
E-mail: kdsada@gmail.com

Abstract

Shock is a state of acute circulatory failure leading to decreased organ perfusion, inadequate delivery of oxygenated blood to tissues, and resultant end-organ dysfunction. A 45-year-old male patient a known case of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) presented to the Emergency Room (ER) with a complaint of fever for four days and shortness of breath for one day. The patient had a wound discharging pus over the dorsum of the right foot for two weeks following trauma. On examination, the patient’s vitals were: pulse rate-88 Beats Per Minute (bpm), respiratory rate-26 breaths per minute, Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)-78% room air, Blood Pressure (BP)-82/40 mmHg mean arterial pressure- 54 mmHg. As a protocol of shock evaluation, Point of Care Ultrasonography (POCUS) showed a distended Inferior Vena Cava (IVC), dilated right atrium and ventricle, and good left ventricular systolic function. Given the presence of right leg swelling, ultrasound was done, which showed a thrombus in the popliteal vein. Noradrenaline infusion was started to maintain a mean arterial blood pressure of 70 mmHg. A diagnosis of obstructive shock due to pulmonary embolism was strongly suspected, and thrombolysis with injection streptokinase was done. After two hours of thrombolysis, Two-Dimensional (2D) Echocardiography (ECHO) revealed normal right atrium and ventricle size and IVC collapsibility index of 70%, but the patient’s blood pressure didn’t improve significantly. So, adequate intravenous fluid was given as per the septic shock protocol. But, the noradrenalin requirement didn’t improve. The patient was put on broad-spectrum antibiotics. Blood culture showed growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. So, a diagnosis of co-existing septic shock with obstructive shock was made. The patient improved and discharged in stable condition. The present case report highlights the co-existence of septic shock and obstructive shock and the usefulness of POCUS in differentiating and managing various shocks.

Keywords

Deep vein thrombosis, Pulmonary embolism, Sepsis, Streptokinase, Thrombolysis

Case Report

A 45-year-old male was presented to the the ER of All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, with the complaint of high grade fever for four days, shortness of breath and altered sensorium, and generalised weakness for two days. The patient had a wound discharging pus over the dorsum of the right foot for two weeks following trauma. Following this, the patient was bed bound with limited movement. The patient has been a known diabetic for the past ten years, taking oral antidiabetic drugs irregularly. The patient has been a smoker for 20 years and is not an alcoholic and was not a known case of chronic respiratory illness, cardiac illness, or hypertension. No history of any surgery in the past. There was no history of bleeding or coagulation disorder in any family members. On examination patient was conscious and oriented (Glasgow coma scale E3 M5 V4). The vitals were pulse rate-88 bpm, respiratory rate-26 breaths/minute, SpO2-78% room air, BP-82/40 mmHg {(mean arterial pressure-54 mmHg)}, temperature-101°F. Random blood sugar was 178 mg/dL. Extremities were cold and neck veins were distended. Chest auscultation revealed normal vesicular breath sounds with no added sound. The right lower limb was swollen with an ulcer over the dorsum of the right foot. The ulcer was 5×5 cm, had a red margin and necrotic base, and was discharging foul smelling pus. It was an infected diabetic ulcer.

The Electrocardiogram (ECG) showed sinus rhythm with t-wave inversion in lead V1, V2, V3, and V4 and QT interval prolongation (QTc-483ms) (Table/Fig 1). Arterial blood gas analysis showed pH 7.398, partial pressure of Carbon Dioxide (pCO2)-28.6 mmHg, partial pressure of Oxygen (pO2)-56 mmHg, Bicarbonate (HCO3)-27 mmol/L, lactate 2.1 mmol/L, sodium 132 mmol/L, potassium-3.67 mmol/L and Ca++1.05 mmol/L. POCUS showed distended IVC collapsibility index 9%, dilated right atrium and ventricle, and Thrombolysisnormal left ventricular systolic function with no regional wall motion abnormality (Table/Fig 2). Compression sonography of the bilateral lower limb revealed an echogenic thrombus in the right popliteal vein (Table/Fig 3). Ultrasound of both lung fields was normal. The D-dimer value was 1.34 mg/L Fibrinogen Equivalent Units (FEU) (normal reference value is <0.5 mg/L FEU).

Because of the above clinical and ultrasound picture, a diagnosis of obstructive shock due to pulmonary embolism was strongly suspected. Oxygen inhalation was started through a high flow nasal cannula at the rate of 10/minute, with which SpO2 improved to 98%. With a noradrenalin infusion rate of 18 mcg/minute, BP improved to 90/65 mmHg (mean arterial pressure 73 mmHg). To relieve obstruction, an accelerated regimen of streptokinase (1.5 million IU over two hours) was given for thrombolysis. After thrombolysis, patient improved significantly, respiratory rate decreased to 16 breaths/minute, oxygen requirement decreased to 4 L/minute through a face mask, noradrenalin infusion dose was reduced from 18 mcg/minute to 6 mcg/minute, peripheries became warm, and neck vein distention disappeared. 2D ECHO revealed a return of dilated right atrium and ventricle to normal size and collapsed IVC collapsing index 70%. Given the above parameters, a successful thrombolysis was confirmed. But, the patient continued to remain in a shock state requiring noradrenalin support. Intravenous fluid bolus was administered as per septic shock protocol, but the noradrenalin requirement didn’t improve. So, a provisional diagnosis of co-existing septic shock was made.

Intravenous Piperacillin-Tazobactam and injection Linezolid was administered after sending the necessary specimens for cultures. After six hours of ER stay patient was shifted to ICU for further treatment. Local wound debridement was done. Blood culture reports revealed Pseudomonas aeruginosa was sensitive to Piperacillin and Tazobactam. The patient slowly improved, and the noradrenalin infusion was tapered off after five days and shifted to the ward. The patient was discharged in stable condition after 10 days.

Discussion

Shock is a state of acute circulatory failure leading to decreased organ perfusion, inadequate delivery of oxygenated blood to tissues, and resultant end-organ dysfunction. Early identification and the start of treatment play a crucial role in its outcome (1). It is broadly classified into hypovolemic, distributive, cardiogenic, and obstructive shock. The common cause of shock in the ER is hypovolemic (30.8%) and septic shock (27.2%), followed by cardiogenic shock (14%) (2). Obstructive shock is rare, seen only in 0.9%. POCUS is now widely available in the Emergency Department (ED) and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and rapid evaluations of fluid status and cardiac and pulmonary function. POCUS helps in the early diagnosis of a hypotensive patient in ER, so that, appropriate treatment can be immediately started (3).

A systematic review found POCUS helpful in diagnosing undifferentiated shock in the ER (4). In a patient with acute pulmonary embolism with hemodynamic instability, thrombolysis reduces the death rate and pulmonary embolism recurrence (5). Haemodynamic instability is characterised by cardiac arrest, obstructive shock and persistent hypotension. Obstructive shock is defined as systolic BP<90 mmHg or vasopressors required to achieve a BP>90 mmHg despite adequate filling status and end-organ dysfunction (6). Thrombolytic therapy leads to rapid improvements in pulmonary pressure, accompanied by RV dilation on echocardiography (7). Surviving sepsis campaign International guidelines for managing sepsis and septic shock, 2021 suggest infusing 30 mL/kg of intravenous crystalloid for septic shock patients for initial resuscitation. The noradrenalin infusion is strongly recommended if mean arterial pressure doesn’t improve with fluid therapy (8).

Two or more types of shock can co-exist in a patient, posing diagnostic and management challenges to the emergency physician. There was one reported case of combined septic and obstructive shock. Zanobetti M et al., reported a case of combined septic and obstructive shock, and they demonstrated the utility of bedside POCUS and 2D echocardiography (9). In the present case, the cause of obstructive shock was an extension of the right lung mass into the right ventricle, causing occlusion of the tricuspid valve. In index patient, obstructive shock due to acute pulmonary embolism and septic shock co-existed with immediate thrombolysis for acute obstructive shock due to pulmonary embolism and subsequent treatment of septic shock helped the patient’s complete recovery.

Conclusion

The present case shows the importance of bedside POCUS in identifying the co-existence of more than one kind of shock in a patient in the ER in a very short time. This helps in the early start of appropriate therapy, which will change the outcome of the patients.

References

1.
Vincent JL, De Backer D. Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(6):583. [crossref]
2.
Holler JG, Jensen HK, Henriksen DP, Rasmussen LM, Mikkelsen S, Pedersen C, et al. Etiology of shock in the emergency department: A 12-year population-based cohort study. Shock. 2019;51(1):60-67. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Sasmaz MI, Gungor F, Guven R, Akyol KC, Kozaci N, Kesapli Ml. Effect of focused bedside ultrasonography in hypotensive patients on the clinical decision of emergency physicians. Emerg Med Int. 2017;2017:6248687. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Berg I, Walpot K, Lamprecht H, Valois M, Lanctot JF, Srour N, et al. A systemic review on the diagnostic accuracy of point of care ultrasound in patients with undifferentiated shock in the emergency department. Cureus. 2022;14(3):e23188. [crossref]
5.
Marti C, John G, Konstantinides S, Combescure C, Sanchez O, Lankeit M, et al. Systemic thrombolytic therapy for acute pulmonary embolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(10):605-14. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, Bueno H, Geersing GJ, Harjola VP, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J. 2020;41(4):543-603. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Goldhaber SZ, Haire WD, Feldstein ML, Miller M, Toltzis R, Smith JL, et al. Alteplase versus heparin in acute pulmonary embolism: Randomized trial. Assessing right-ventricular function and pulmonary perfusion. Lancet. 1993;341(8844):507-11.[crossref][PubMed]
8.
Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(11):1181-247. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Zanobetti M, De Villa E, Lazzeretti D, Conti A, Pinni R. A case of combined septic and obstructive shock: Usefulness of bedside integrated cardiothoracic emergency ultrasonography. Case Rep Emerg Med. 2013;2013:154861.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63387.18110

Date of Submission: Feb 18, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Mar 20, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Apr 22, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2023

Author declaration:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 28, 2023
• Manual Googling: Apr 17, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Apr 21, 2023 (4%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 5

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com