Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 46234

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : July | Volume : 17 | Issue : 7 | Page : OC33 - OC37 Full Version

Renal Complications of Benign Tertian Malaria: A Case-control Study from South Delhi, India


Published: July 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/63628.18195
Mohammadd Ashraf Khan, Dharmander Singh, Kanupriya Bajaj, Siddharth Kumar, Afroz Jamal, Varun Kashyap, Vineet Jain, Sunil Kohli

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, New Delhi, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, New Delhi, India. 3. Junior Resident, Department of Medicine, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, New Delhi, India. 4. Junior Resident, Department of Medicine, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, New Delhi, India. 5. Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, New Delhi, India. 6. Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, New Delhi, India. 7. Professor, Department of Medicine, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, New Delhi, India. 8. Professor and Head, Department of Medicine, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, New Delhi, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Dharmander Singh,
B Block, Department of Medicine, HAHC Hospital, New Delhi-110062, India.
E-mail: dr.dharmander@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Plasmodium vivax (P. vivax) malaria is a major public health problem worldwide, particularly in the tropical and subtropical regions. Although P. vivax malaria is generally considered less severe than Plasmodium falciparum (P. falciparum) malaria, it can still cause severe illness, including severe anaemia, respiratory distress, and cerebral malaria, which can be fatal. Additionally, due to its relapsing nature it can further complicate treatment. Despite being a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, P. vivax malaria has received relatively less attention than P. falciparum malaria. Therefore, present study was designed to evaluate renal complications.

Aim: To study the prevalence of renal involvement and its associations with clinical manifestations, laboratory parameters, and other complications in monoinfection of P. vivax malaria.

Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective case-control study done over three years duration between April 2017 to March 2020. A total of 380 patients data were taken from hospital records of Hakeem Abdul Hameed Centenary (HAHC) Hospital, New Delhi, India admitted with a diagnosis of P. vivax infection. Renal complications were assessed in all patients admitted with the diagnosis of P. vivax. Renal involvement was defined as per Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria for Acute Kidney Injury (AKI). For statistical calculations, data was analysed into two groups i.e., AKI and non AKI. Clinical, laboratory and other complications were assessed for statistical significance by t-test/Mann-Whitney test and for correlation between AKI and these variables univariate analysis was done initially followed by multivariate analysis.

Results: Male to female ratio in present study was 1.8:1. The prevalence of AKI was 22.59% with a male: female=2.1:1. Mean age in the AKI group was 35.89±14.69 years as compared to the non AKI group was 29.40±12.44 years (p-value=0.019). Renal involvement was significantly associated with rising hepatic transaminases (p-value=0.02, 0.018 for each variable). Leukopenia was protective for AKI; however rising leukocyte count was associated with increasing odds of renal involvement with Odd Ratio (OR) of 7.486 (p-value=0.001). AKI was strongly associated with increasing age, leukocytosis, and hyperbilirubinaemia. Whereas hepatic transaminases, hyponatraemia, cerebral malaria, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and thrombocytopaenia were weakly associated with AKI.

Conclusion: P. vivax is not benign malaria anymore; complications should be anticipated and treated at an early stage.

Keywords

Acute kidney injury, Renal insufficiency, Severe manifestations

Malaria is caused by the transmission of any of the five strains of the Plasmodium species to humans, most commonly by the bite of a female anopheles mosquito. Despite the advancements in public health measures, insecticidal agents, and antimalarial drug therapy, malaria continues to be a major causative agent of acute febrile illness in the tropics. In the year 2021, there was an estimated 247 million malaria cases globally, and 4.9 million of these were due to P. vivax (1). While P. falciparum is the predominant strain worldwide and is also considered the most fatal (2). However, some recent studies have highlighted the morbidity and mortality, of the potential of infections with P. vivax (3),(4),(5),(6). India has the highest case burden of malaria (79%) in the Southeast Asia region and accounts for 83% of mortality associated with malaria in this region (1). As per the world malaria report 2022, 39.7% of malaria cases in the Southeast Asia region can be attributed to P. vivax which is much higher than its global contribution of 2% (1).

The National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme management guidelines for malaria warrant the use of light microscopy, wherever available or atleast bivalent rapid diagnostic tests in remote settings to distinguish the Plasmodium species (7),(8). Since P. vivax has been historically considered a benign variant of the disease, it can lead to delay in diagnosing a complicated case (9). Cerebral malaria, pulmonary oedema, AKI, sepsis, jaundice, severe haemolysis, thrombocytopaenia, and shock are some of the recognised complications of malaria infection (10). Even though these complications have most commonly been associated with the P. falciparum they can occur nevertheless with P. vivax as well (10). AKI is a common complication in patients seeking acute critical care. AKI can further complicate the disease by adding to the acid base abnormalities and electrolyte abnormalities and causing fluid overload. AKI can be diagnosed in patients based on oliguria, or a rising trend in serum creatinine or urea levels (11). Since, a complicated malarial illness is a medical emergency, physicians should have a high index of suspicion for the same irrespective of the malarial species (10),(12),(13).

A few case reports in recent years have reported AKI in P. vivax infection but the data available is limited in number. P. vivax has a propensity to cause AKI due to intravascular haemolysis and due to it’s a relapsing nature it may further complicate the disease. It has much higher morbidity as estimated previously warranting an extensive study to be carried out (13),(14),(15). Hence, present study was planned to study the AKI in P. vivax and its correlation with clinical parameters, laboratory parameters and with respect to other complications in P. vivax malaria.

Material and Methods

The present study was a retrospective case-control study done by extracting the data of patients admitted to HAHC Hospital, which is a tertiary healthcare centre in New Delhi, India. Due clearance from the hospital’s ethics committee (IEC number HIMSR/IEC/48/2017) was obtained before the data collection.

Inclusion criteria: In present study patients which were admitted to this hospital between April 2017 and March 2020 with a final diagnosis of P. vivax Malaria were included in the study. The diagnosis of P. vivax was confirmed by either Giemsa-stained peripheral blood smear examination of thin or thick smear, and/or by P. vivax specific lactate dehydrogenase rapid antigen test.

Exclusion criteria: All patients with a co-infection of any documented viral, bacterial, or mixed malarial infections. Patients who had chronic kidney disease, or were on immunosuppressants and pregnant females were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

The study included a total of 380 patients diagnosed with P. vivax malaria, out of which 17 were excluded as per exclusion criteria. A total of 363 patients were included for data analysis, 82 were included in the AKI group (cases) and the remaining 281 formed the non AKI group (controls). Detailed data regarding the history, findings of physical examination, treatment advised along with disease progression and the daily laboratory analysis were recorded as per fixed performa in Microsoft excel sheet from the hospital records. Haematological tests were performed using the Sysmex haematological analyser, biochemical investigations were performed using the Siemens Xp and biochemistry autoanalyser. All the relevant information was compiled in a spreadsheet.

The AKIN criteria is a more accurate reflection of the development of AKI and require concurrent measurements of serum creatinine and urine output. To label a patient with the development of AKI there should be an acute rise in serum creatinine of ≥0.3 mg/dL or a decrease in urine output to <0.5 mL/kg/hr for >6 hours with normal sized kidneys confirmed with ultrasonography (11). As the maximum upper limit of the standard value of creatinine of 1.2 mg/dL, hence, by applying AKIN criteria, any patient with a serum creatinine of ≥1.5 mg/dL were labelled as AKI and hence such patients formed the case group, and patients with serum creatinine <1.5 mg/dL were labelled as non AKI group and formed the control group.

Statistical Analysis

All the analysis was performed in International Business Machines (IBM) Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0. Categorical data were represented in percentage form and continuous data was represented in Mean±SD format. In categorical data, Z test of proportion was applied to compare two groups and for Normal distributed data Independent t-test was applied while in non normal distributed data the Mann-Whitney test was used. To know the association of risk factors in AKI vs non AKI patient’s univariate and multivariate analysis was done at 95% confidence interval. The p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

As per present study, 363 patients were enrolled in the study and out of which as per AKIN criteria 82 were diagnosed as AKI secondary to P. vivax infection, hence a 22.59% incidence was obtained. P. vivax infection distribution as per gender was 232 (63.91%) males and 131 (36.09%) females i.e., male to female ratio of 1.8:1. Despite the high rate of infection of P. vivax in the male gender, the rate of AKI development was slightly higher in the male population 68.29% vs 31.7% in females i.e., male to female ratio of 2.1:1, which was statistically non significant.

In the evaluation of age, the mean age was 30.8 in total patients, 35.89 in the case group, and 29.4 in the control group. However, there was no significant statistical difference between the age in the case and the control group. None of the individual co-morbidity played a significant role in the development of AKI among P. vivax patients. Amongst the history and physical examination variations between the two groups, breathlessness, cough, and cerebral malaria were statistically significant and were higher in the AKI group (Table/Fig 1). Other history and examination details such as fever, chills, vomiting, bodyache, and abdominal pain had approximately similar incidences in both groups. The present study also showed a difference in the incidence of bleeding in the two groups i.e., 15.85% vs 8.89% in cases vs control group, but the difference was clinically insignificant.

Further, various laboratory and imaging results were also compared between the two groups to establish any correlation or for early predication of development of AKI in acute P. vivax infection. The differences between the case and the control group were statistically significant for leukopenia, or leukocytosis, severe thrombocytopaenia, hyperbilirubinaemia, and a rise in hepatic transaminases. However, development of shock and mortality were approximately similar in both groups. Radiological findings were also approximately similar in both groups but non significant (Table/Fig 2).

To establish the correlation and causal relationship between the variables and AKI, univariate analysis was performed for all possible variables for the risk of developing AKI. As per univariate analysis, it was found that age more than 60 years, hyponatraemia, cerebral malaria, raised bilirubin, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), thrombocytopaenia (platelet count <50,000 cells/uL), and a rising Total Leukocyte Count (TLC) i.e., >4000/uL were all found to be significantly correlated with the development of AKI, for these significant variables, further multivariate analysis was done to identify most significant risk factor or variable for the development of AKI (Table/Fig 3). In elderly patients increased age i.e., >60 years, leukocytosis (TLC >10,000) and an increased level of serum bilirubin were found to be the most significant factors associated with the development of AKI by multivariate analysis (Table/Fig 4).

Discussion

As most cases of complicated malaria are historically considered to be due to the less common P. falciparum malaria, studies linking the clinical and laboratory parameters in complicated P. vivax infection have been sparse and limited. The incidence of AKI was 22.59% amongst diagnosed P. vivax malaria cases and previous studies had estimated the prevalence of AKI in P. vivax cases ranging from 6-40% (4),(16),(17). Hence, the present study had almost the same frequency of AKI as documented previously in other studies (4),(12).

The mean age for the AKI group was approximately 35 years of age and in the non AKI group was 29 years of age, however a definite correlation between age and development of AKI could not be established, but in patients developing AKI, patients more than 60 years of age or elderly people with P. vivax infection were more prone for developing AKI than the patients with younger age, and younger age were more prone than children. Risk of AKI increase with increasing age which was confirmed to be a significant parameter on univariate, in which age was found to be significant with a p-value=0.040 even in multivariate regression, similar risk of AKI with increasing age had been described in many studies (4),(5),(18),(19). Hence, elderly patients should have close monitoring of laboratory parameters as well as clinical parameters and should be monitored more frequently than the younger population. The most probable postulated reasons for developing AKI in these patients could be due to compromised renal function due to age-related fall in glomerular filtration rate, due to multiple co-morbidities or patients already on polypharmacy which may play a role in AKI or due to some unknown pathology or immune dysfunction which need further elaborate studies.

Distribution of patients as per gender for male; female was in a ratio of approximately 1.8:1 in the total population, which was slightly higher in patients in the AKI group i.e., 2.1:1 but there was no statistical significance, similar male predilection had been documented in various studies, however no definite cause had been detected and it is non significant statistically in previous studies too (4),(19). Even though the distributions of common clinical symptoms such as fever, chills, vomiting, body aches, and abdominal pain were not significantly different in the two groups. These clinical symptoms had been found significant in few studies whereas other studies label these as non significant, abdominal pain and vomiting had been found closely associated in few studies with AKI (6),(20), it was noted that breathlessness and cough had a higher prevalence in the AKI group in present study and similar association was seen in another study where ARDS was also correlating with AKI (17). Hence, clinical symptoms cannot be used as a guide to predict the development of AKI. But patients having cough and breathlessness should definitely be monitored for renal dysfunction. These symptoms may also be attributed to AKI and volume overload. However, these symptoms do predict ARDS, but ARDS was not found to be significantly associated with AKI in present study. Hence, these two symptoms should be visualised de novo for the development of ARDS or AKI. Definitive evidence of this can only be known by the temporal development of these symptoms, as in a previous published research, these symptoms were significant but AKI was associated with ARDS (17).

The pathogenesis of AKI because of malaria has not been well understood. It is believed that renal microcirculation obstruction, haemodynamic factors, and hypovolemia along with activation of the immune system and endothelial damage with the accompanying release of inflammatory mediators have a role to play in the development of AKI in patients infected with P. vivax (12),(13),(14),(18),(19). Previous studies have also shown hepatic dysfunction and increased bilirubin and liver enzymes to be closely associated with the development of AKI in malaria patients (4),(14),(16). This along with the other laboratory derangements has the potential to serve as an early indicator for the development of AKI in P. vivax infections. As also seen in present study AKI patients had raised total bilirubin (4),(6),(14),(17),(21) and transaminase level three times the upper normal limit and the variations in the level of these were statistically significant in AKI vs non AKI group. Multiple studies published from across the globe shows similar association of AKI with total bilirubin and transaminases, among all available literature, approximately all studies agrees on association of AKI with total bilirubin (5),(14),(16),(21). Similarly, presence of encephalopathy was also significant in AKI patients (6),(20). Hence, it can be postulated that some strains of P. vivax malaria have a predilection for capillary microcirculation in the liver, kidney, and brain vessels, hence the presence of one of these should alert the physician for prediction of presence of the other two variables (5),(15),(16),(20). Hence, few patients have these complications together, while few have other complications like bleeding, ARDS, hypoglycaemia, anaemia etc., which may be due to variations in strains of P. vivax (15).

In haematological parameters, haemoglobin variations were not found to be significant implying, there was no severe haemolysis in AKI patients (18). Therefore, haemoglobinuria causing AKI cannot be postulated as a major cause of AKI. In evaluation of leukocytes, leukopenia was protective for development of complications, while leukocytosis was significantly correlated with development of AKI, which may be due to rising inflammation, and inflammatory mediators leading to AKI. This was a unique association noted in this study that as TLC rises, so the chances of AKI also rise and vice versa, there are very few studies which had correlated leukocytosis with AKI and had similar outcome (14),(18). Thrombocytopaenia was also significant in AKI patients, which may be due to severe acute inflammation leading to platelet adhesions and thrombocytopaenia (18),(22),(23). Hypovolemia or shock and mortality both were insignificant in AKI patients, implying that shock doesn’t predispose to AKI. However, there were wide variations in shock, mortality and acidosis in P. vivax patients few had significant correlations, while others negate any correlation. As per present study due to absence of shock in AKI patients, cause of AKI being prerenal was unlikely, which was well established in various other studies, even proven with kidney biopsy (12),(13),(20). So overall, after evaluation of laboratory parameters, it can be derived that, the cause of AKI was not tubular or prerenal. Hence, most likely cause being interstitial intrinsic AKI due to inflammation caused by some strains of P. vivax malaria (14),(18). However, even the presence of AKI doesn’t increase chances of mortality in these patients. So malarial strains causing AKI, increase morbidity, hospital stay, and treatment cost, but mortality was not raised because of these strains (4),(5),(6).

So as discussed above there were multiple variables that were significant and hence there was a confusion of actual variables associated with AKI pathogenesis. Hence, to remove confounding variables and to isolate the most strongly associated variables/factors associated with AKI, regression equations were applied to all possible parameters causing AKI. In univariate analysis, findings were exactly similar as written above with extra additional findings of significant hyponatraemia in AKI patients (20), which may be attributed to volume overload causing hypervolemic hyponatraemia, which is very well studied in AKI (20). Another additional finding was the TLC counts, that signifies leukopenia is protective, however even a normal leukocyte count is a risk factor for AKI but leukocytosis is definitely a grave sign with p-value of 0.001 suggesting inflammation to be the main role for the pathogenesis of AKI (17).

To correlate the variables multivariate regression analysis was done only on the variables which were found significant on univariate analysis. Postmultivariate analysis, only clinical parameter found to be significant was age (4),(18),(19), while for laboratory parameters total bilirubin levels (4),(6),(14),(17),(21), leucocytosis (5),(17) were highly significant, hyponatraemia (6),(20),(23) was borderline significant with a p-value of 0.057. Hence, hepatopathy with or without transaminitis and AKI with hyponatraemia were most closely correlated (4),(6),(19). Pathogenesis of this AKI can be postulated by the absence of severe haemolysis or shock in this group hence ruling out intrinsic tubular or prerenal causes respectively. So, after ruling out these causes, intrinsic AKI due to interstitial nephritis was the most probable cause for AKI (12),(13),(18). This pathogenesis of interstitial nephritis was either linked to severe inflammation caused by malarial P. vivax infection, as correlated by leukocytosis, thrombocytopaenia, and mild transaminitis or this may also be attributed to predilection of some strains to specific microvasculature, hence causing AKI and hepatopathy (4),(14),(16) in few while ARDS, encephalopathy, bleeding, metabolic acidosis, etc., in others. So, inflammation theory may explain AKI, but can’t explain why different patients have different complications and why some of them occur together more commonly than others.

In general, clinicians should not consider malaria caused by P. vivax to be benign and have a high degree of suspicion for the development of AKI, especially in older patients or the ones with derangements in bilirubin or high leukocyte count (4),(6),(13). Early diagnosis and recognition of AKI can lead to early referral/administration of the renal replacement therapy along with other aggressive treatment administration which can considerably reduce the morbidity (4),(5),(6).

Limitation(s)

The present study had multiple limitations which had led to underestimation of AKI such as AKIN criteria for urine output was not taken into account for all patients as this was retrospective analysis. Secondly, a fixed criteria for diagnosis of AKI was used i.e., creatinine >1.5 mg/dL, however as per AKIN criteria, a patient whose baseline creatinine maybe 0.6 mg/dL, even a creatinine value of 1.0 mg/dL should be considered AKI. Hence, if a baseline creatinine would have been available then AKI would have been diagnosed more accurately.

Conclusion

The AKI is a common complication of P. vivax malaria and correlates with the morbidity of the disease. Incidence of AKI was higher in elderly patients, those with raised bilirubin, or with a raised leukocyte count. Hence, patients with the above mentioned characteristics should warrant for a stringent monitoring schedule. Such patients should be maintained on a positive fluid balance. Patients who develop AKI should be under close monitoring for hepatic dysfunction. Further studies are needed to evaluate the cause effect relationships and the temporal association of AKI and hepatic dysfunction caused by P. vivax.

References

1.
Abdisalan N. World malaria report 2022. World Health Organisation; 2022. 77-121.
2.
Noor A. World malaria report 2022. World Health organisation. 2022;77-121.
3.
Matlani M, Kojom LP, Mishra N, Dogra V, Singh V. Severe vivax malaria trends in the last two years: A study from a tertiary care centre, Delhi, India. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2020;19(1):01-11. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Saravu K, Rishikesh K, Parikh CR. Risk factors and outcomes stratified by severity of acute kidney injury in malaria. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e90419. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Santos T, De Medicina F, Doutor T, Vieira H, Jose D, Brito-Sousa D, et al. Acute kidney injury in Plasmodium vivax malaria hospitalized patients in Manaus, Brazilian Amazon: Are we underestimating the real burden? 2019. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.17608/v1.[crossref]
6.
Naqvi R. Plasmodium vivax causing acute kidney injury: A foe less addressed. Pakistan J Med Sci. 2015;31(6):1472-75. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
World Health Organization. Guidelines for the treatment of malaria. 3 rd ed. World Health Organization; 2015. Pp. 313.
8.
Kalpana B, editor. Manual on integrated vector management in India 2022. Delhi: National Center for Vector Borne Diseases Control; 2022. Pp. 162.
9.
Cowman AF, Healer J, Marapana D, Marsh K. Malaria: Biology and disease. Cell. 2016;167(3):610-24. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Rahimi BA, Thakkinstian A, White NJ, Sirivichayakul C, Dondorp AM, Chokejindachai W. Severe vivax malaria: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies since 1900. Malar J. 2014;13(1):01-10. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Lin CY, Chen YC. Acute kidney injury classification: AKIN and RIFLE criteria in critical patients. World J Crit care Med. 2012;1(2):40. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Kute VB, Shah PR, Munjappa BC, Gumber MR, Patel HV, Jain SH, et al. Outcome and prognostic factors of malaria-associated acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis: A single center experience. Indian J Nephrol. 2012;22(1):33-38. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Kute VB, Vanikar AV, Ghuge PP, Goswami JG, Patel MP, Patel HV, et al. Renal cortical necrosis and acute kidney injury associated with Plasmodium vivax: A neglected human malaria parasite. Parasitol Res. 2012;111(5):2213-16. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Nair RK, Rao KA, Mukherjee D, Datt B, Sharma S, Prakash S. Acute kidney injury due to acute cortical necrosis following vivax malaria. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2019;30(4):960-63. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Agrawal P, Kumar A, Parwaiz A, Rawat A, Tiewsoh K, Nada R. Complement factor H gene polymorphisms and vivax malaria associated thrombotic microangiopathy. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2019;30(2):540-44. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Kaushik R, Kaushik RM, Kakkar R, Sharma A, Chandra H. Plasmodium vivax malaria complicated by acute kidney injury: Experience at a referral hospital in Uttarakhand, India. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2013;107(3):188-94. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Anghan H, Sethi P, Soneja M, Mahajan S, Wig N. Clinical and laboratory features associated with acute kidney injury in severe malaria. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2018;22(10):718-22. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Kimmatkar P, Jhorawat R, Gandhi K, Kumar R, Malhotra V, Agrawal D, et al. Acute kidney injury in patients with Plasmodium vivax malaria: Clinicohistopathological profile. Saudi J Heal Sci. 2016;5(3):138. [crossref]
19.
Mishra SK, Das BS. Malaria and acute kidney injury. Semin Nephrol. 2008;28(4):395-408. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Kute VB, Trivedi HL, Vanikar AV, Shah PR, Gumber MR, Patel HV, et al. Plasmodium vivax malaria-associated acute kidney injury, India, 2010-2011. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18(5):842-45. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Manjit, Dhankar M, Singh J, Aggarwal H, Jain D. Study of acute kidney injury in malaria at a tertiary care hospital in northern India. IJMSIR. 2021;6(2):187-94.
22.
Lacerda MVG, Mourão MPG, Coelho HC, Santos JB. Thrombocytopenia in malaria: Who cares? Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2011;106(Suppl.1):52-63. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Kumar A, Shashirekha. Thrombocytopenia- An indicator of acute vivax malaria. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2006;49(4):505-08.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63628.18195

Date of Submission: Feb 22, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Mar 29, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jun 17, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 28, 2023
• Manual Googling: Apr 13, 2023
• iThenticate Software: May 12, 2023 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 5

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com