Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 38231

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : July | Volume : 17 | Issue : 7 | Page : OC17 - OC20 Full Version

Incidentally Detected Anaemia in Elderly: A Cross-sectional Study from a Tertiary Care Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India


Published: July 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/64940.18177
Ajinkyaraj Jayaji Pandhare, Shilpa Sule, Sujata Khatal

1. Postgraduate Student, Department of General Medicine, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of General Medicine, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of General Medicine, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Ajinkyaraj Jayaji Pandhare,
Flat No. 18, Phase 1, Patang Plaza, Nr. Wellness Forever, Dhankawadi, Katraj, Pune-411043, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: 5001.ajinkyaraj@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Iron Deficiency Anaemia (IDA) is most prevalent nutritional deficiency observed worldwide. The elderly population is particularly susceptible. It is a significant risk factor for increased mortality and morbidity, reducing mobility and quality of life. Currently, less Indian data is available for incidentally detected anaemia in elderly. The known causes of anaemia in elderly are nutritional, anaemia of chronic disease and malignancy.

Aim: To evaluate the haematological profile and to identify potential aetiologies of anaemia in elderly who had an incidental diagnosis of anaemia.

Materials and Methods: This was a prospective cross-sectional hospital-based observational study, which included 90 incidentally diagnosed patients with anaemia above 60 years of age, admitted in Department of General Medicine, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India during March 2021 to September 2022. Complete Blood Counts (CBCs) with peripheral blood smear, Haematocrit (Hct), reticulocyte counts, Red Blood Cells (RBC) indices like Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV), Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH) and cell morphology were all examined for each patient. The statistical programme Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) (version 26.0) was used to analyse the data. The Chi-square test was used to evaluate the qualitative parameters.

Results: The mean age was 66.44±5.87 years; 52 (57.8%) were men, and 38 (42.2%) were women. The most prevalent co-morbid conditions were diabetes and hypertension. The common clinical signs observed were pallor, oedema, knuckle pigmentation. In the present study, IDA was the most frequent aetiology 53 (58.9%), second being megaloblastic anaemia 24 (26.7%), followed by dimorphic anaemia 13 (14.4%). Gastritis was commonest finding on gastroscopy.

Conclusion: Anaemia is a common finding amongst elderly population which remains undiagnosed and is ignored. The main cause is nutritional deficiency leading to IDA, megaloblastic anaemia or dimorphic anaemia. Hence, geriatric population should undergo regular screening for early recognition of anaemia. Further large population studies are required for detailed evaluation to determine the causes of anaemia in elderly.

Keywords

Gastritis, Iron deficiency anaemia, Megaloblastic anaemia

Haemoglobin levels <12 gm/dL in women and 13 gm/dL in men are considered anaemic, according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) (1),(2). Improved diagnostics and demographic changes in the society has led to increase in prevalence of anaemia. As per haemoglobin values on admission patients were divided in three groups: severe (Hb <8 gm/dL), moderate (Hb 8 gm/dL to <10.0) and mild (Hb 10 gm/dL to lower limit of normal) (3). Anaemia increases the risk of several unfavourable outcomes for older adults, such as hospitalisation, morbidity, and mortality. In light of the rising prevalence of anaemia with ageing, the elderly with anaemia represent a significant demographic segment that is expanding quickly (4).

The prevalence of anaemia in elderly patients is found to be 37.88% and it is correlated with iron deficiency, inflammatory diseases, cancer, and low serum erythropoietin levels (5). The majority of the time, chronic diseases, iron deficiency, or myelodysplastic syndromes can be found to be the underlying cause of anaemia in elderly people 65 years of age and older (6). Further testing can reveal that one third of these elderly anaemic patients had nutritional deficiencies or myelodysplastic syndromes, one third has Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), and one third has unexplained anaemia. One of the most frequent causes of anaemia is IDA, but because elderly people frequently have multiple co-morbid conditions, it can be challenging to diagnose IDA. Common causes of iron deficiency in elderly patients include inadequate dietary intake, malabsorption, and blood losses (7). In National Health And Nutrition Examinations Survey (NHANES) survey it was observed that elderly had typically mild anaemia (defined as haemoglobin levels >10 g/dL). Anaemia was found in 10% of community dwelling adults above 65 years of age. In nursing homes the prevalence goes upto 48-63%. Even mild anaemia in the elderly has been linked to a number of serious adverse effects, such as a decline in physical activity, decline in cognitive function, rise in falls, rise in dementia, rise in hospitalisations, rise in mortality, and a multidimensional loss of function (8). Anaemia was significantly associated with increased risk of death and mobility disability in western population as compared to Indians (9). Numerous ageing symptoms, such as fatigue, shortness of breath, and diminished cognition, are also symptoms of anaemia. As a result, anaemia can be overlooked in this population. In order to increase the overall quality of life and lifespan of frail older people who are at risk for negative outcomes, haemoglobin level serves as a useful screening marker (4). Present study aimed to find the prevalence of anaemia amongst the elderly population visiting to the tertiary care centre for reasons other than anaemia and the commonest cause of anaemia among them. This will help to formulate an algorithm for early diagnosis and prompt management of anaemia to avoid morbidity and mortality. In the current study, clinical, biochemical, and haematological findings in elderly patients with incidentally discovered anaemia were studied in order to assess the aetiopathogenesis of anaemia.

Material and Methods

The current study was a prospective cross-sectional hospital-based observational study carried out between March 2021 and September 2022 at the Department of General Medicine, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India. Ninety elderly people of either gender over the age of 60 who had incidentally been diagnosed with anaemia and haemoglobin values of <13 g/dL for men and <12 g/dL for women from the medicine OPD and ward were included in the study. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC). (Ref No.BVDUMC/IEC/9). All study participants provided informed consent.

Inclusion criteria: All subjects above the age of 60 years who were incidentally diagnosed to have anaemia were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Subjects who were already diagnosed with and receiving treatment for anaemia, chronic inflammatory diseases, or CKD and were receiving chemotherapy or radiation therapy were excluded from the study. Out of 130 screened, 90 subjects were included in study and 40 were excluded from study (As study aim was to diagnose incidentally detected anaemia, screening was done).

Sample size calculation: The data was provided to the statistician and sample size was calculated using appropriate statistical test.

Study Procedure

A thorough dietary and medical history, socio-demographic information and clinical examination were done as per predesigned proforma. For each patient CBC with peripheral blood smear, Hct, reticulocyte count, and RBC indices such as MCV, MCH, and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC), serum iron studies and cell morphology were studied. Ultrasonography (USG) was also done in few patients. In indicated patients upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy was done. Stool occult blood and colonoscopy could not be done in all patients, though indicated as they had some other concurrent illnesses like diabetes mellitus, hypertension, Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19), cataract, urinary tract infection, respiratory tract infections etc., for which they were being evaluated and treated.

Statistical Analysis

The data was analysed using SPSS statistical software (version 26.0). The qualitative parameters were presented as percentages and frequencies and compared between the groups using the Chi-square test. The quantitative parameters were presented as mean±Standard Deviation (SD), and the differences in the means were compared using the student’s t-test. The p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The current study included 90 elderly incidentally diagnosed anaemic patients. The mean age of the patients was 66.44±5.87 years. There were 52 (57.8%) males and 38 (42.2%) females, with a male-to-female ratio of 1:3. The mean Body Mass Index (BMI) value was 21.98±2.34 kg/m2. The most common co-morbidity among anaemic elderly patients was hypertension, which was reported by 35 (38.9%) patients, followed by diabetes mellitus in 29 (32.2%), hypothyroidism in 6 (6.7%), and heart disease in 1 (1.1%) patient. The most common clinical sign was pallor reported in all study population (100%), distribution of patients according to the clinical signs present is depicted in (Table/Fig 1).

(Table/Fig 2) shows different aetiologies of anaemia among elderly patients with anaemia.

The association between gender and laboratory parameters was studied. In current study, the BMI was significantly higher in males compared to females (p-value=0.016). While all other parameters studied did not differ significantly between the groups. In general population, females had more prevalence of anaemia as compared to males but this difference is not evident in elderly in the present study. The means of laboratory parameters according to gender with respective p-values are shown in (Table/Fig 3).

Present study noted the diet pattern of the study population, among the 90 patients, 57 (63.3%) consumed a mixed diet, and 33 (36.7%) were vegetarians. The laboratory parameters were compared between the groups based on diet pattern and is presented in (Table/Fig 4). The present study found significant increases in BMI (p-value=0.027), MCV (p-value <0.0001), MCH (p-value <0.0001) and serum iron (p=0.002), while a significant decrease in platelet count (p-value=0.001) and vitamin B12 (p-value=0.0062) was found in elderly patients consuming a vegetarian diet as compared to patients consuming mixed diet. While all other parameters studied did not differ significantly between the groups. The means of laboratory parameters according to diet with respective p-values are shown in (Table/Fig 4).

Most of the patients who underwent gastroscopy (n=25) had iron deficiency anaemia (80%) (Table/Fig 5). Stool occult blood test could be done in 67 patients only. It was positive in 21 patients and negative in 46 patients. Colonoscopy could be done in only one patient which showed haemorrhoids. Out of 90 patients, 12 patients underwent ultrasonography. Out of these 12 patients, two patients had hepatomegaly, three patients had splenomegaly, two patients had bilateral mild renal disease, and there were two patients with ascites, one each with incisional hernia, prostatomegaly, bilateral renal parenchymal disease.

Discussion

Anaemia can affect people of any age, but older people are more vulnerable because the prevalence of anaemia increases with age, reaching nearly 50% in elderly men, and will continue to increase as the population ages (10),(11),(12),(13). Currently, it is believed that anaemia in the elderly is a pathologic condition brought on by underlying illnesses. Anaemia is therefore no longer regarded as an age-related condition and shouldn’t be associated with senescence (14),(15). Anaemia affects 39% of elderly people worldwide who are 60 years of age or older, but it affects 54.1% of people in Asia (16).

The current study, aimed to assess laboratory parameters among elderly patients with incidentally detected anaemia. A total of 90 elderly patients with incidentally detected anaemia were included; their average age was 66.44±5.87 years, their BMI was 21.98±2.34 kg/m2, and there were 1.37 times as many men as women among them. Choi CW et al., in their study found that 13.6% of the 1254 elderly subjects were anaemic (17). Anaemia was found in 35.3% of cases among the elderly population, according to Krishnapillai A and Omar MA (18).

In the current study, pitting pedal oedema was second most common sign (35.6%), after pallor which was seen in all patients (100%), 1.1% of people had facial oedema. Palpitations, anorexia, and fatigue were listed as the top three symptoms by Bhasin A et al., in their study. Age-related nail changes are frequent in the elderly (19). In present study, nail changes such as koilonychia 6 (6.6%), platynychia 8 (8.8%), clubbing 1 (1.1%) were seen in a small number of patients, while knuckle pigmentation was seen in 26 (28.9%) of elderly anaemic patients.

Since anaemia is frequently caused by iron deficiency, vitamin B12 and/or folate deficiency, chronic illness, and other pathological conditions, its precise characterisation in this population was done in conjunction with an evaluation of vitamin B12 status. According to their aetiologies, anaemias can be divided into four groups: clonal anaemias, nutritional deficiency anaemias, bleeding anaemias, and anaemias that arise because of chronic inflammation and CKD. There are a few cases, though, where no cause was found (20),(21),(22). In the present study, the most common aetiology was IDA, followed by megaloblastic anaemia, dimorphic anaemia, and other forms of anaemia. In contrast the most frequent aetiologies of anaemia, according to Mann S et al., were megaloblastic anaemia, iron deficiency anaemia, and unexplained anaemia (23). Similar to the current study, Tettamanti M et al., identified iron deficiency as a common cause of anaemia in the elderly along with anaemia of chronic disease (24).

The IDA is the most prevalent nutritional deficiency anaemia. Malnutrition is frequently associated with iron depletion similar to folate deficiency. Malnutrition and subsequent anaemia can result from the gastrointestinal tract’s age-dependent functional changes, polypharmacy, and social isolation. Malnutrition can lead to folate deficiency, especially when combined with alcohol abuse. Anticonvulsants and medications like methotrexate are additional causes. Pernicious anaemia, the standard vitamin B12-deficient anaemia, is not common. On the other hand, Helicobacter pylori infections, acid-reducing medications, or atrophic gastritis may cause hypochlorhydria, which more frequently results in a syndrome of food-cobalamin malabsorption (21),(24),(25).

In present study, anaemic elderly females had a significantly lower BMI as compared to males. In comparison to subjects with a mixed diet, the subjects with vegetarian diet had a significantly low platelet count in elderly patients. BMI, MCV, MCH, and serum iron were more in the subjects consuming vegetarian diet in comparison with those consuming mixed diet. Unlike the current study, which found no significant differences in haemoglobin levels between elderly males and females, Kim HS and Lee BK reported significantly lower mean haemoglobin levels in females than in males (11). Men’s haemoglobin levels declined more noticeably than women’s, according to Salive ME et al., (26).

Reduced quality of life, dementia, insomnia, low mood, and cardiovascular disease are all risks that are increased by low haemoglobin levels. Additionally, impaired physical and executive functions are associated with anaemia. People with low haemoglobin levels are more susceptible to fractures and falls. Anaemia is also closely related to longer hospital stays and more frequent admissions (21). Even mild anaemia is strongly linked to poor clinical outcomes; it should receive clinical attention rather than simply being considered a normal part of ageing (27). In this study, out of 90 patients, 12 patients underwent ultrasonography. Out of these 12 patients, two patients had hepatomegaly, three patients had splenomegaly, two patients had bilateral mild renal disease, and there were two patients with ascites, one each with incisional hernia, prostatomegaly, bilateral renal parenchymal disease. In current study, out of 90 patients 25 underwent upper gastrointestinal scopy. Majority of these patients had IDA. The commonest finding on scopy was gastritis. Stool occult blood test could be done in 67 patients only. It was positive in 21 patients and negative in 46 patients.

Limitation(s)

Detailed anaemia evaluation could not be done as patients were incidentally detected anaemia. Larger multicentric studies to evaluate causes of anaemia in elderly will help in future to effectively prevent, diagnose and treat elderly with anaemia.

Conclusion

In the present study, the proportion of older adults with incidentally discovered anaemia was significant. Anaemia from iron deficiency was the main reason. Anaemia is considered to be an important prognostic factor for several illnesses. The present study highlights the significant underdiagnosis of anaemia in the older population. Therefore, it is advised that aged patients should undergo routine anaemia screening and assessment in order to ensure early diagnosis and prompt management to reduce morbidity and death.

References

1.
Cappellini MD, Motta I. Anaemia in clinical practice-definition and classification: Does hemoglobin change with aging? In Seminars in Haematology. 2015;52(4):261-69. WB Saunders. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Beutler E, Waalen J. The definition of anaemia: What is the lower limit of normal of the blood hemoglobin concentration? Blood. 2006;107(5):1747-50. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Bohlius J, Weingart O, Trelle S, Engert A. Cancer-related anaemia and recombinant human erythropoietin-An updated overview. Nat Clin Pract Oncology. 2006;3(3):152-64. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Goodnough LT, Schrier SL. Evaluation and management of anaemia in the elderly. Am J Hematol. 2014;89(1):88-96. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Alwar V, Reethi K, Rameshkumar K. Geriatric anaemia: An Indian perspective. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2013;29(2):126-27. Doi: 10.1007/s12288- 012-0146-y. Epub 2012 Feb 1. PMID: 24426356; PMCID: PMC3636354. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Steensma DP, Tefferi A. Anaemia in the elderly: How should we define it, when does it matter, and what can be done? Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82(8):958-66. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Joosten E, Pelemans W, Hiele M, Noyen J, Verhaeghe R, Boogaerts MA. Prevalence and causes of anaemia in a geriatric hospitalized population. Gerontology. 1992;38(1-2):111-17. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Patel KV. Epidemiology of anaemia in older adults. Semin Hematol. 2008;45:210-17. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Patel KV, Harris TB, Faulhaber M, Angleman SB, Connelly S, Bauer DC. Racial variation in the relationship of anaemia with mortality and mobility disability among older adults. Blood. 2007;109(11):4663-70. Doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-10-055384. Epub 2007 Feb 6. PMID: 17284526; PMCID: PMC1885520. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Penninx BW, Pahor M, Woodman RC, Guralnik JM. Anaemia in old age is associated with increased mortality and hospitalization. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(5):474-79. Doi: 10.1093/gerona/61.5.474. PMID: 16720744. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Kim HS, Lee BK. Cross-sectional study on the prevalence of anaemia among rural elderly in Asan. Nutr Res Pract. 2008;2(1):08-12. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Bach V, Schruckmayer G, Sam I, Kemmler G, Stauder R. Prevalence and possible causes of anaemia in the elderly: A cross-sectional analysis of a large European university hospital cohort. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:1187-96. Doi: 10.2147/CIA.S61125. PMID: 25092968; PMCID: PMC4113572. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Balducci L. Epidemiology of anaemia in the elderly: Information on diagnostic evaluation. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:S2-S9. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Nissenson AR, Goodnough LT, Dubois RW. Anaemia: Not just an innocent bystander? Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(12):1400-04. Doi: 10.1001/ archinte.163.12.1400. Erratum in: Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(15):1820. PMID: 12824088. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Lipschitz DA, Mitchell CO, Thompson C. The anaemia of senescence. Am J Hematol. 1981;11:47-54. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
World Health Organization. Worldwide Prevalence of Anaemia 1993-2005 of WHO Global Database of Anaemia; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008. Worldwide prevalence of anaemia 1993-2005 (who.int).
17.
Choi CW, Lee J, Park KH. Prevalence and characteristics of anaemia in the elderly: Cross sectional study of three urban Korean population samples. Am J Hematol. 2004;77(1):26-30. Doi: 10.1002/ajh.20140. PMID: 15307102. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Krishnapillai A, Omar MA. The prevalence of anaemia and its associated factors among older persons: Findings from the National Health and Morbidity Survey (NHMS) 2015. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:4983. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Bhasin A, Rao MY. Characteristics of anaemia in elderly: A hospital based study in South India. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2011;27(1):26-32. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Rao S, Banerjee S, Ghosh SK, Gangopadhyay DN, Jana S, Mridha K. Study of nail changes and nail disorders in the elderly. Indian J Dermatol. 2011;56(5):603-06. Doi: 10.4103/0019-5154.87174. PMID: 22121296; PMCID: PMC3221241. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Stauder R, Thein SL. Anaemia in the elderly: Clinical implications and new therapeutic concepts. Haematologica. 2014;99(7):1127-30. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Stauder R, Valent P, Theurl I. Anaemia at older age: Etiologies, clinical implications, and management. Blood. 2018;131(5):505-14. Doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-07- 746446. Epub 2017 Nov 15. PMID: 29141943. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Mann S, Kumar A, Singh SK, Katyal S, Chopra G, Varma SK. Clinical evaluation of anaemia in geriatric patients-A cross sectional study conducted at tertiary care hospital. National Journal of Community Medicine. 2014;5:316-20.
24.
Tettamanti M, Lucca U, Gandini F, Recchia A, Mosconi P, Apolone G. Prevalence, incidence and types of mild anaemia in the elderly: The “Health and Anaemia” population based study. Haematologica. 2010;95(11):1849-56. Doi: 10.3324/ haematol.2010.023101. Epub 2010 Jun 9. PMID: 20534701; PMCID: PMC2966906. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Ahmed T, Haboubi N. Assessment and management of nutrition in older people and its importance to health. Clin Interv Aging. 2010;5:207-16. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Salive ME, Cornoni-Huntley J, Guralnik JM, Phillips CL, Wallace RB, Ostfeld AM. Anaemia and hemoglobin levels in older persons: Relationship with age, gender, and health status. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40(5):489-96. Doi: 10.1111/j.1532- 5415.1992.tb02017.x. PMID: 1634703. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Guralnik J, Ershler W, Artz A, Lazo-Langner A, Walston J, Pahor M. Unexplained anaemia of aging: Etiology, health consequences, and diagnostic criteria. J Am Geriatr Soc . 2022;70(3):891-99.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/64940.18177

Date of Submission: Apr 24, 2023
Date of Peer Review: May 17, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jun 29, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 26, 2023
• Manual Googling: May 24, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jun 06, 2023 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com