Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 44342

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : July | Volume : 17 | Issue : 7 | Page : OC05 - OC09 Full Version

Complementary Value of Tissue Doppler Imaging in Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography: A Prospective Cohort Study


Published: July 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/62304.18165
V Sudha Kumary, Jayaprakash Kesava Pillai, KJ Raihanathul Misiriya

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Cardiology, MCH, Kottayam, Ernakulam, Kerala, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Cardiology, MCH, Kottayam, Ernakulam, Kerala, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Cardiology, MCH, Kottayam, Ernakulam, Kerala, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. V Sudha Kumary,
Sudhanilam, Chemmanampady, Gandhinagar P.O., Kottayam, Ernakulam-686008, Kerala, India.
E-mail: drsudhaanil@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: In patients with Coronary Artery Diseases (CAD), the presence of viable myocardium predicts the recovery of Left Ventricular (LV) systolic function after revascularisation. The identification of myocardial viability during dobutamine stress echocardiography is subjective and with observer bias. Tissue Doppler Imaging (TDI) echocardiography has opened new possibilities for non-invasive quantification of myocardial function by directly interrogating myocardial velocity with high temporal and spatial resolution.

Aim: To determine the baseline regional myocardial and mitral annular Maximum Systolic Velocities (MSV) in patients with LV dysfunction and to compare the MSV values in viable and non-viable myocardium.

Materials and Methods: In this prospective cohort study, TDI of regional and annular LV myocardial velocities was performed at the baseline (at rest) in 352 patients with CAD and LV dysfunction who were referred for dobutamine stress Echocardiography. Viability assessment by 2 Dimensional (2D) methods was done simultaneously using routine dobutamine stress protocol. Patients were grouped in two groups based on the presence or absence of viability with 2D stress echocardiography. TDI velocities were compared in the two groups of patients with and without myocardial viability. Measurements of regional wall thickness, Ejection Fraction (EF) and Wall Motion Score Index (WMSI) were done to assess the regional and global LV function in these patients. Those patients who underwent revascularisation were subsequently assessed for functional recovery by 2D and TDI echocardiography before discharge from the hospital. Analyses were conducted using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 58.2±8 years. Among 352 patients studied (124 females and 228 males), mean age 58 years (range 36 to 75 years). A total of 243 patients (69%) with viable myocardium as per 2D echocardiography had higher cut-off Baseline Regional Maximum Systolic Velocity (BRMSV) >0.03 m/s and baseline mitral annular systolic velocity >0.06 m/s with high sensitivity and specificity compared to patients with severe contractile dysfunction and non-viable myocardium.

Conclusion: Tissue doppler parameters like regional myocardial systolic and mitral annular velocities have shown significantly higher cut-off values in those patients with ischaemic and viable myocardium compared to non-viable myocardium.

Keywords

Mitral annular velocity, Regional maximum systolic velocity, Viable myocardium

Qualitative and semi quantitative evaluations of myocardial function by 2-D and M-mode echocardiography have long been the most important non-invasive methods for diagnosing CAD (1),(2). The hibernating myocardium denotes to resting LV dysfunction due to reduced coronary blood flow that can be somewhat or completely reversed by myocardial revascularisation and by reducing myocardial oxygen demand (3),(4). Identification of ischaemic and viable myocardium has important prognostic and therapeutic implications as significant recovery of function occurs after revascularisation (5).

Ischaemic and hibernating myocardium may appear as wall motion abnormalities in 2D echocardiography (6) and have a positive inotropic reserve which can be stimulated by catecholamine in contrast to irreversibly damaged myocardium. Stress echocardiography aims at detecting a stimulated positive inotropic response in segmental wall motion. In the clinical setting of CAD and LV dysfunction, prediction of LV functional improvement after revascularisation is done by using various methods like nuclear scanning, cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and dobutamine stress echocardiography (7),(8). Scintigraphic studies with Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG PET) and thallium-201 have demonstrated accurate results in the detection of viability and the prediction of LV recovery (9),(10). FDG PET is currently reputed to be the most sensitive (11),(12). Being low cost, dobutamine stress echocardiography which is based on 2D visual assessment of the examiner is the most frequently used stress echocardiographic test for detection of myocardial viability. Infusion of dobutamine at rates of 5 to 20 μg/kg/minutes is used to detect myocardial viability. Though dobutamine stress echocardiography is a frequently used and valuable tool for the evaluation of ischaemic myocardium, its interpretation still remains subjective, relying on image quality and sonographer’s experience (13),(14).

TDI permits assessments of myocardial velocities which may reflect regional myocardial function by using frequency shift of sound waves (15). TDI echocardiography has opened new possibilities for non-invasive quantification of myocardial function by directly interrogating myocardial velocity with high temporal and spatial resolution (16). Regional myocardial systolic velocity can be low in infarcted myocardium compared to viable and ischaemic zones. In Studies by Kalra DK et al., and Shan K et al., Peak systolic velocity (Sm) and early diastolic velocity (Em) were significantly higher in normal segments. Previous researches have demonstrated peak myocardial velocities in normal myocardium without much work on infarcted muscle (17),(18). Measurement of these regional velocities can offer an objective means to quantify global and regional LV function and to improve the accuracy and reproducibility of conventional echocardiography. The present study was designed to investigate how velocity patterns in ischaemic and infarcted myocardium relate to regional function at rest. It tests whether quantitative DTI provides information regarding the regional myocardial systolic function and compares the values in those with and without viability by 2D dobutamine stress echocardiography. It aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the TDI parameters for the detection of viable myocardium.

Material and Methods

This was a prospective cohort study conducted from 1st January to 30th June 2015 conducted on patients undergoing dobutamine stress echocardiography at the Department of Cardiology, Government Medical College, Kottayam, and Kerala, India. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) (SBMR- IRC 05/2014).

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged between 18-75 years with CAD and LV dysfunction, classified according to New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class I, II, and III (20) were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients classified as NYHA functional class IV, those with significant arrhythmia, Myocarditis or Valvular/congenital heart disease were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: Sample size was calculated from a Pilot study conducted with 50 cases, the prevalence of viable myocardium in patients undergoing stress echo was 35% (19). In order to detect a difference of 0.25 between the proportions of acceptable intubating conditions per group, with 80% power and 5% level of significance, 352 patients were included.

Study Procedure

After consent from patients, and applying inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, patients with CAD and LV dysfunction were taken up for the study. History was taken and a clinical examination was done. A 2D assessment of regional wall motion and M-mode assessment for regional wall thickness and EF were done. Regional Wall Motion Score Index (RWMSI), and Ejection Fraction (EF) were calculated at rest (21). TDI was performed at the baseline. Baseline Annular Maximum Systolic Velocity (BAMSV) and BRMSV were measured by placing the cursor at medial and lateral annulus (average of the 2 was taken) and at two points where the myocardium appears hypocontractile (average of the two was taken).

Viability assessment by 2D methods was done simultaneously using routine dobutamine stress protocol. Dobutamine was infused at rates of 5 to 20 μg/kg/minutes (22). Patients were grouped in two groups (243 patients had viable myocardium and 109 had non-viable myocardium) based on the presence or absence of viability with 2D stress echocardiography. TD velocities were compared in the two groups of patients with and without myocardial viability by 2D dobutamine stress. Those patients who underwent revascularisation by Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) based on their symptoms and 2D viability findings were subsequently underwent 2D and TDI and measured the Regional Maximum Systolic velocity post-procedure (RMSVP) to assess the functional recovery before discharge from the hospital.

Statistical Analysis

Data was entered in Microsoft Excel and data analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0. Normality of the data was assessed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The comparison of quantitative variables between the two groups were analysed by independent sample t-test. Association between categorical variables was analysed by the Chi-square test. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted Area Under Curve (AUC). Variables that were found significantly associated with the dependent variables were subjected to multivariate analysis. ROC 6curve of predicted probability of the Binary logistic regression model for VIB 2D was made.

Results

Among 352 patients studied 124 were females and 228 were males with the mean age 58.2±8 years (Table/Fig 1). There was significant association between DM, HTN, CAD CSA, CAD ACS, PTCA and CABG and 2D viability (Table/Fig 2).

In the present study, mean RWMSI was 1.66 in patients with viable myocardium compared to 2.69 in those with non viable myocardium; p<0.001 (Table/Fig 3).

Two hundred and forty five patients underwent PCI and 25 patients underwent CABG and 82 patients did not undergo revascularisation and were rejected in view of their irreversible LV dysfunction. Of these 270 patients who underwent revascularisation 253 (93.7%) had functional recovery.

From the AUC of ROC, optimum cut-off BRMSV >0.03 m/s sensitivity 100, Specificity 99.08, positive predictive value (+PV 99.6) and negative predictive value (-PV100). Optimum cut-off BAMSV >0.06 m/s Sensitivity 98.35 Specificity 93.58+PV97.2 and -PV96.2 (Table/Fig 4).

There were significant positive correlations of BAMSV between the RWTs and EF in those with viable myocardium, and negative correlation with WMSI, indicated by the r values as shown in
(Table/Fig 5).

Correlation was assessed for only for BAMSV. BRMSV values were similar and hence correlation assessment was not possible. There are only small differences between the values among the non viable group with regard to RMSV. In the binary logistic regression model for viability viable myocardium group had significant p-value in terms of BAMSV and also with dyslipidaemia (Table/Fig 6).

Area under the ROC curve (AUC) 0.984; Standard error 0.006; 95% Confidence interval 0.965 to 0.994; z statistic 77.67; Significance level P (area=0.5) <0.0001 (For a given cut-point in a prediction model or score, the mean of sensitivity and specificity equals the AUC). (Table/Fig 7). Sensitivity and specificity 98.4%; Standard error 0.006; 95% Confidence interval 0.965 to 0.994; z statistic 77.67; Significance level P (area=0.5) <0.0001.

Discussion

Tissue doppler parameters like regional myocardial systolic and mitral annular velocities has shown significantly higher cut-off values in those patients with ischaemic and viable myocardium compared to non-viable myocardium. It complements the standard interpretation of stress echocardiograms. Mean and SD of BRMSV in patients with and without viable myocardium was 0.053±0.007; 0.026±0.006 (t: 36.048 p<0.001). Similarly mean and SD BAMSV is 0.057±0.008; 0.086±0.018 (t: 15.674 p<0.001). The present study, however, demonstrates importance of peak systolic velocity to serve as a quantitative marker of regional function. The ability of peak regional velocity to serve as a quantitative marker of regional function was confirmed in the ischaemic and viable myocardium with higher cut-off values using ROC. A number of studies have confirmed the diagnostic potential of TDI in the assessment of regional myocardial function (23),(24),(25). In the present study, the peak myocardial velocity value in non-ischaemic myocardium showed satisfactory agreement. In a study by Voigt JU et al., 25 normal subjects were observed at rest using parasternal and apical methods (26). Peak maximal velocity value was 0. 37±0.29 cm/sec.

WMSI was calculated for the entire left ventricle and for each vascular territory using the sum of individual scores divided by the respective number of segments. A WMSI of 1.0 (16/16) is considered normo kinetic. WMSI of 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and 3 are designated mild hypokinesia, hypokinesia, severe hypokinesia and akinesia, respectively (27). RWMSI mean±SD in patients with and without viable myocardium are 1.66±0.28; 2.69±0.32 (p<0.001). In the present regional wall thickness at end diastole was low in infarcted myocardium compared to the viable and ischaemic myocardium. The normal range myocardial thickness is 0.6-1.0 cm LV posterior wall end diastole. Patients with non-viable and ischaemic myocardium will be having high WMSI and low myocardial thickness, as well as, low cut-off values of myocardial systolic velocities. Myocardium with thick infarct (>50% transmurality) undergoes wall thinning during contraction as opposed to healthy myocardium. In the present study, mean±SD of regional wall thickness in patients with and without viable myocardium are 6.61±0.86; 4.46±0.55 (p<0.001), EF mean±SD 43.29±22.72; 29.14±3.44 (p<0.001). In a study by Walpot J et al., normal values LV mid-diastolic wall thickness from coronary CT angiography found that the LV was thickest in the basal septum with a mean thickness of 8.3 mm and 7.2 mm and thinnest in the midventricular anterior wall with 5.6 mm and 4.5 mm for men and women, respectively (28).

The present findings indicate that the diagnostic power of dobutamine stress echocardiography may be improved by measuring maximum systolic and mitral annular velocities. In actively contracting myocardium, the peak systolic velocity measured during LV ejection reflected changes in myocardial function. In severely ischaemic and dyskinetic myocardium, however mitral annular velocities were the better markers of myocardial dysfunction. TDI parameters namely baseline mitral annular velocity showed a positive correlation with viable myocardium of 2D stress echocardiography. Together with WMSI and RWTHI tissue doppler velocities complement the prediction of viable myocardium to the dobutamine stress echocardiography.

Qualitative and semi quantitative evaluations of myocardial function by 2D and M-mode echocardiography have long been the most important non-invasive methods for diagnosing CAD. TDI is a potentially powerful method for diagnosing myocardial ischemia and infarction and has been introduced as a method to quantify myocardial function in terms of tissue velocities and ischaemic regions are characterised by a decrease in systolic velocities at rest or during stress echo (15),(23).

The clinical implementation of TDI, however, has been relatively slow, and most echocardiographic laboratories do not apply TDI as a routine diagnostic method. This may in part be attributed to a lack of established criteria for how to analyse and interpret the TDI velocity trace, which reflects the relatively limited insight into the aetiology of the different velocity components. Timing of TDI velocities in relation to the different cardiac phases should be possible by simultaneous display of myocardial velocities, ECG, and aortic and mitral valve signals (24). Systolic velocities are directed upwards and diastolic velocities are directed downwards (e’ and a’ early and late myocardial velocities). (Table/Fig 8) is the example showing TDI of a patient from the laboratory.

Limitation(s)

The measurements of absolute velocities are angle dependent, and one should be aware of this limitation. The problems with cardiac translation and rotation are inherent in all TDI techniques. In the present study, standard 2-chamber and short axis views were used and no attempt was made to correct for angle dependency of TDI measurements. Myocardial ejection velocities had very low amplitudes and appeared to be influenced by tethering effects and/or translational motion.

Conclusion

Diagnostic power of dobutamine stress echocardiography may be improved by measuring maximum systolic and mitral annular velocities. In actively contracting myocardium, the peak systolic velocity measured during LV ejection reflected changes in myocardial function. In severely ischaemic and dyskinetic myocardium, however, mitral annular velocities were the better markers of myocardial dysfunction. TDI parameters namely baseline mitral annular velocity showed a positive correlation with viable myocardium of 2D stress echocardiography. Together with WMSI and RWTHI, tissue doppler velocities complement the prediction of viable myocardium to the dobutamine stress echocardiography.

References

1.
Meluzín J, Cerný J, Frélich M, Stetka F, Spinarová L, Popelová J, et al. Prognostic value of the amount of dysfunctional but viable myocardium in revascularised patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32(4):912-20. Doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00324-6. PMID: 9768711. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Pozzoli G, Montani E, Scarpini S, Ferrari S, Repetto S, Rumolo R, et al. Role of M-mode and 2-dimensional (sector-scan) echocardiography in studying postinfarct ventricular kinetic changes G Ital Cardiol. 1980;10(5):525-35. PMID: 7450374.
3.
Nagueh SF, Mikati I, Weilbaecher D, Reardon MJ, Al-Zaghrini GJ, Cacela D, et al. Relation of the contractile reserve of hibernating myocardium to myocardial structure in humans. Circulation. 1999;100:490-96. https://Doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.100. 5.490. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Rahimtoola SH. The hibernating myocardium. Am Heart J. 1989;117(1):211-21. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Afridi I, Kleiman NS, Raizner AE, Zoghbi WA. Dobutamine echocardiography in myocardial hibernation: Optimal dose and accuracy in predicting recovery of ventricular function after coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1995;91(3):663-70. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Lee KS, Marwick TH, Cook SA, Go RT, Fix JS, James KB, et al. Prognosis of patients with left ventricular dysfunction with and without viable myo-cardium after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1994;90(6):2687-94. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Vanoverschelde JL, D’Hondt AM, Marwick T, Gerber BL, De Kock M, Dion R, et al. Head-to-head comparison of exercise-redistribution-reinjection thallium single-photon emission computed tomography and low dose dobutamine echocardiography for prediction of reversibility of chronic left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28(2):432-42. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Arnese M, Cornel JH, Salustri A, Maat A, Elhendy A, Reijs AE, et al. Prediction of improvement of regional left ventricular function after surgical revascularisation: A comparison of low-dose dobutamine echocardiography with 201TI single-photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. 1995;91(11):2748-52. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Perrone-Filardi P, Pace L, Prastaro M, Squame F, Betocchi S, Soricelli A, et al. Assessment of myocardial viability in patients with chronic coronary artery disease: Rest-4-hour-24-hour 201Tl tomography versus dobutamine echocardiography. Circulation.1996;94(11):2712-19. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Wiggers H, Nielsen TT, Bøttcher M, Egeblad H, Bøtker HE. Positron emission tomography and low-dose dobutamine echocardiography in the prediction of postrevascularisation improvement in left ventricular function and exercise parameters. Am Heart J. 2000;140(6):928-36. PMID: 11099997 Doi: 10.1067/mhj.2000.110766. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Tamaki N, Kawamoto M, Takahashi N, Yonekura Y, Magata Y, Nohara R, et al. Prognostic value of an increase in fluorine-18 deoxyglucose uptake in patients with myocardial infarction: Comparison with stress thallium imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22(6):1621-27. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Khalaf S, Chamsi-Pasha M, Al-Mallah MH. Assessment of myocardial viability by PET. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2019;34(5):466-72. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Attenhofer C, Ritter M, Jenni R. Stress echocardiography: Development and significance Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1994;124(34):1467-78. PMID: 7939513.
14.
Marcovitz PA, Armstrong WF. Dobutamine stress echocardiography: Diagnostic utility. Herz. 1991;16(5):372-78. PMID: 1757063.
15.
Rambaldi R, Desideri A, Bigi R, Cortigiani L, Mantero A, Fiorentini C. Myocardial doppler at rest for the identification of myocardial viability. Ital Heart J. 2003;4(3):179-85. PMID: 12784744.
16.
Bountioukos M, Schinkel AF, Bax JJ, Biagini E, Rizzello V, Krenning BJ, et al, Pulsed-wave tissue Doppler quantification of systolic and diastolic function of viable and nonviable myocardium in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J. 2004;148(6):1079-84. Doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.05.022. PMID.[crossref][PubMed]
17.
Shan K, Bick RJ, Poindexter BJ, Shimoni S, Letsou GV, Reardon MJ, et al. Relation of tissue Doppler derived myocardial velocities to myocardial structure and beta-adrenergic receptor density in humans J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36(3):891-96. Doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00786-5. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Kalra DK, Ramchandani M, Zhu X, Lawrie G, Reardon MJ, Mann DL, et al. Relation of tissue Doppler-derived myocardial velocities to serum levels and myocardial gene expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and inducible nitric oxide synthase in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy having coronary artery bypass grafting. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2002;7(1):708-12. PMID: 12356382. Doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02594-8. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW, Klar J, Lwanga SK. Adequacy of sample size in health studies. John Wiley and Sons, 1990. Available at: https://digitallibrary. un.org/record/49698?ln=en.
20.
Caraballo C, Desai NR, Mulder H, Alhanti B, Wilson FP, Fiuzat M, et al. Clinical Implications of the New York Heart Association Classification 27 Nov 2019. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2019;8:e014240. Available at: https://Doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.014240. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Lebeau R, Serri K, Di Lorenzo M, Sauvé C, Viet Le VH, Soulières V, et al. Assessment of LVEF using a new 16-segment wall motion score in echocardiography. Echo Res Pract. 2018;5(2):63-69. Published online 2018 Mar 21. Doi: 10.1530/ERP-18-0006. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Gillam LD, Marcoff L. Stress Echocardiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(6):e009319. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
ur Rahman H, Khan SB, Noor L, Hadi A, Nawaz T, Shah ST, et al. Assessment of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function by tissue Doppler imaging after acute myocardial infarction. J Ayub Med coll Abbottabad. 2011;23(2):108-11.
24.
Nestaas E, Schubert U, de Boode WP, El-Khuffash A; European Special Interest Group ‘Neonatologist Performed Echocardiography’ (NPE). Tissue Doppler velocity imaging and event timings in neonates: A guide to image acquisition, measurement, interpretation, and reference values. Pediatr Res. 2018;84(Suppl 1):18-29. Published online 2018 Aug 2. Doi: 10.1038/s41390-018-0079-8 PMCID: PMC6257218 PMID: 30072806. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Bountioukos M, Schinkel AFL, Bax JJ, Biagini E, Rizzello V, Krenning BJ, et al. Pulsed-wave tissue Doppler quantification of systolic and diastolic function of viable and nonviable myocardium in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J. 2004;148(6):1079-84. Doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.05.022. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Voigt JU, Arnold MF, Karlsson M, Hübbert L, Kukulski T, Hatle L, et al. Assessment of regional longitudinal myocardial strain rate derived from doppler myocardial imaging indexes in normal and infarcted myocardium. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2000;13(6):588-98. https://Doi.org/10.1067/mje.2000.105631. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Jurado-Román A, Agudo-Quílez P, Rubio-Alonso B, Molina J, Díaz B, García- Tejada J, et al. Superiority of wall motion score index over left ventricle EF in predicting cardiovascular events after an acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019;8(1):78-85. PMID: 27738092. Doi: 10.1177/2048872616674464. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Walpot J, Juneau D, Massalha S, Dwivedi G, Rybicki FJ, Chow BJW, et al. Left Ventricular mid-diastolic wall thickness: Normal values for coronary CT angiography. Radiology Cardiothoracic Imaging. 2019;1(5):e190034. PMID: 33778527PMCID: PMC7977927. Doi: 10.1148/ryct.2019190034. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Arnese M, Cornel JH, Salustri A, Maat A, Elhendy A, Reijs AE, et al. Prediction of improvement of regional left ventricular function after surgical revascularisation: a comparison of low-dose dobutamine echocardiography with 201TI single-photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. 1995;91(11):2748-52.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/62304.18165

Date of Submission: Dec 15, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Mar 27, 2023
Date of Acceptance: May 23, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Dec 17, 2022
• Manual Googling: Apr 18, 2023
• iThenticate Software: May 22, 2023 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 9

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com