Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 47927

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : July | Volume : 17 | Issue : 7 | Page : NC01 - NC04 Full Version

Association of Dry Eye with Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis: A Hospital-based Cross-sectional Study


Published: July 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/61475.18189
Challapalli Himabindu, Niharika KriShna Shetty

1. Postgraduate, Department of Ophthalmology, Sri Siddhartha Medical College and Research Centre, Tumkur, Karnataka, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Ophthalmology, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences Hospital and Research Centre, Bellur, Mandya, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Niharika Krishna Shetty,
Professor and Head, Department of Ophthalmology, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences Hospital and Research Centre, Bellur, Mandya-562123, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: niharika.shetty30@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) is a common allergic disease seen in children. The allergic component is caused by Immunoglobulin E (IgE) and mast cell-mediated pathway. It is proposed to be a combination of immune system, genetic, and environmental factors. Secondary dry eye develops secondary to inflammatory disease namely vascular, allergic, environmental conditions like allergens, cigarette smoke, hormonal changes, systemic disorders, such as diabetes mellitus, eye surgeries such as refractive surgery and systemic medications, such as diuretics and antihistamines. Co-existence of dry eye and VKC can worsen the symptoms of the patient and may also lead to prolonged and unnecessary treatment of the disease.

Aim: To study the association of dry eye with VKC by Schirmer’s test and Tear Film Breakup Time (TBUT).

Materials and Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Opthalmology, Sri Siddhartha Medical College and Research Centre, Tumkur, Karnataka, India, from December 2020 to June 2022. Thirty-three patients of age group between 5-20 years with symptoms of VKC were evaluated for dry eye using Schirmer’s test and TBUT, respectively. Each patient was subjected to detailed history taking, followed by ocular examination as per the predesigned proforma. The patients were subjected to the tear film analysis using Schirmer’s test and TBUT. The data was compiled and the association between categorical variables were analysed using Chi-square test. The data was analysed using Statistical Package fot the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 21.0. The parameters compared were the type of dry eye with the type of VKC.

Results: The mean±Standard Deviation (SD) age of the study group was found to be 11±1.5 years. Out of 33 patients, 69.69% of all the cases were seen in the 5-12 years age group. There was male preponderance in the present study with 63.63% of patients being male child. VKC was most commonly seen as mixed accounting for 57.57% of cases. In the current study, it was discovered that 60.6% of cases showed no sign of dry eye, whereas 39.82% of cases had dry eye. The dry eye was more commonly seen in mixed type of VKC. The p-value was statistically significant (p-value <0.001) for association of dry eye with mixed type of VKC.

Conclusion: The present study highlighted the co-existence of dry eye with VKC. There was a significant association of dry eye with VKC and type of VKC as well, which might have long-term effects on the ocular surface. These ocular surface alterations exist during active and the quiet phase of VKC. The patients of VKC may need a long-term follow-up and treatment for this ocular surface alteration.

Keywords

Allergy, Limbus, Palpabral, Schirmer’s test, Tear breakup time

The VKC is a recurrent, bilateral, seasonal and an external ocular inflammatory disease of unknown cause. VKC is known to have an allergic component caused by IgE and mast cell-mediated pathway. It is proposed to be a combination of immune system, genetic, and environmental factors (1). The clinical picture of VKC is characterised by ocular symptoms such as ocular pruritus, tearing, burning, foreign body sensation and photophobia (2). Clinical signs of VKC include a papillary reaction of the upper tarsal conjunctiva and throughout the limbus. The disease can be classified into three clinical subtypes based on the location of the papillae: tarsal (palpebral, limbal or bulbar and mixed form) (3).

The tarsal form is characterised by large, cobblestone like papillae on the upper tarsal conjunctiva. These can differ in shape and size, but are usually defined as >1.0 mm in diameter (1),(3). The limbal form typically involves Horner Trantas dots, indicating lymphocytic and eosinophilic infiltration of the limbal conjunctiva (1),(3). The mixed form is characterised by the presence of both tarsal and limbal sub types in only one eye (as signs are often heterogeneous between eyes). VKC occurs mainly in children and young adults with onset often occurring in the first decade of life (predominantly 5-10 years). While it is considered a long-term disease with an average duration of 4-8 years (4), VKC generally subsides before or just after puberty, but can leave permanent lesions in patients with severe disease (4). The disease is more common among males than females, with a ratio of 3:1, but this difference may become less at older ages of onset (4).

Vernal and atopic conjunctivitis are also hypothesised to be the causes of dry eye disease and dry eye like symptoms (5). Dry eye syndrome is a disease of the ocular surface and it is multifactorial. Dry eye is characterised by inflammation of the ocular surface and reduction in tear production (5). The definition of Dry Eye Disease (DED) as per Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS) II of the Tear Film Ocular Surface Society (TFOS) was identified as a multifactorial ocular surface illness that is characterised by a vicious cycle of tear film instability and hyperosmolarity (6),(7).

Secondary dry eye arises as a result of inflammatory disease, specifically vascular, allergy, and environmental factors like allergens, tobacco smoke and hormone changes. Systemic disorders including diabetes mellitus, refractive eye surgery, and systemic drugs like diuretics and antihistamines (8). Studies have shown an overlap of dry eye and allergic conjunctivitis, but recent reports show the synergic effect of these both conditions in affecting tear film dynamics, and ocular surface maintenance (8),(9).

Inflammations in the eye can be a causative factor for goblet cell damage, Mucin 5AC, Oligomeric Mucus/Gel-forming (MUC5AC) messenger Ribonucleic Acid (mRNa), expression, and corneal nerves damage, contributing to dry eye (9). Hence, the present study was pursued to evaluate the association between dry eye and VKC. It exacerbates the symptoms of allergy and may also alleviate the complications of VKC. In the present study, association between Schirmer’s graded dry eye and with VKC was also made. This study also tried to grade the severity of the dry eye (TBUT) with the subtype of VKC.

Material and Methods

A hospital-based cross-sectional study conducted in the Department of Opthamology, Sri Siddhartha Medical College and Research Centre, Tumkur, Karnataka, India, from December 2020 to June 2022. The study was approved by Institutional Ethics Committee (SSMC/MED/IEC-42/ JAN-2021). All patients who presented with symptoms of VKC at Sri Siddhartha Medical Hospital were selected and evaluated for dry eye with Schirmer’s and TBUT tests in the study.

Inclusion criteria: Patients of age group between five to 20 years as it typically affects first decade of the life presenting with symptoms like ocular pruritus, tearing, burning, foreign body sensation and Photophobia, tear film instability were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with pre-existing dry eye, pre-existing keratoconjunctivitis sicca, meibominitis, patients having vitamin A deficiency and patients with history of atopy were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

A total of 33 patients were sequentially collected after considering inclusion and exclusion criteria. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects after the nature of the study was explained to them. A comprehensive ophthalmic examination, including Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA), slit-lamp examination, was undertaken for all participants. Snellen’s chart was used to assess VA and improvement with pinhole, if any was noted. The patients were subjected to the tear film analysis using Schirmer’s test and tear film breakup time. The Schirmer’s test was carried out as follows, to evaluate the production of aqueous tears. Sterilised paper strips were placed in the inferior temporal area of the conjunctival sac in both eyes.

The patient was instructed to close their eyes, the room was softly light, and the length of wetness was measured in millimetres after five minutes. Wetness of <15 mm after three minutes was considered abnormal. A value of less than 6 mm of strip wetting in three minutes was accepted as diagnostic marker of aqueous tear deficiency. The time before tear film breaks up following a blink is referred to as TBUT. The normal TBUT is between 15 and 20 seconds. A fluorescein strip that has been moistened with saline covers the inferior cul-de-sac. After several blinks, the tear film was examined using a broad-beam slit lamp with a blue filter to check for the appearance of the first dry spots on the cornea. Less than 5 to 10 second TBUT values were indicative of a tear deficiency. Severity of dry eye was categorised with TBUT <10 seconds, moderate <5-10 seconds, severe <5 seconds (10),(11) and according to the Schirmer’s test, mild <10 mm, moderate <5-10 mm, severe <5 mm (12),(13).

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistical analysis was done by mean and standard deviation for quantitative variables and frequency/percentage for 2categorical variables. The association between categorical variables were analysed by using Chi-square test. The data was analysed by using SPSS software version 21.0 and p-value <0.05 has been considered as level of significance.

Results

The mean±SD age in the present study was found to be 11±1.5 years. The age-wise distribution is mentioned in the (Table/Fig 1).

The patients were distributed according to gender as shown in the (Table/Fig 2). Males 21 (63.63%) were found to be more frequently affected by VKC than females 12 (36.36%).

Patients were distributed according to the type of VKC as shown in (Table/Fig 3). Mixed type accounted for 57.57% of instances of VKC, which was the most prevalent kind, followed by 8 (24.24%) patients with bulbar type and 6 (18.18%) patients with palpebral type.

The frequency distribution of deranged TBUT in patients with VKC is shown in (Table/Fig 4).

In the present study, it was found that 39.82% of cases showed dry eye with mild (27.27%), moderate (9.09%), and severe (3.03%). Schirmer’s test results were shown in (Table/Fig 5) for the evaluation of dry eyes in VKC. In the current study, dry eye was present in 30.3% of patients and 69.69% of cases had no evidence of dry eye.

(Table/Fig 6) compares the kind of VKC with the TBUT-related dry eye. In the present study, dry eye was more commonly seen in mixed type 6 (66.7%) of VKC. The p-value was statistically significant (p-value <0.001) for association with mixed type of VKC.

Comparison of the type of VKC with the Schirmer’s associated dry eye is shown in (Table/Fig 7). Schirmer’s test results for mixed types of VKC revealed the presence of both mild 7 (87.5%) and moderate 2 (100%) dry eyes. There was a statistically significant association with p-value <0.001. Both the Schirmer’s test for dry eyes and the TBUT test for dry eyes show statistically significant differences in the proportion of the various types of VKC with the grades of dry eye.

Discussion

The present study was designed to determine the association of dry eyes with VKC. Majority of the patients belonged to 5-8 years age group. The results of the present study were in accordance with Saboo US et al., where, the mean age of presentation of VKC was 12 years (14). In a study conducted in Ethiopia, Alemayehu AM et al., discovered that the average age of presentation was eight years (15). VKC was reported to affect males (63.63%) more frequently than females (36.36%). The findings of the current study were consistent with those of investigations by Alemayehu AM et al., and Saboo US et al., in which 87% of cases and 55.6% of cases, respectively, were males (14),(15).

In the current study, majority of patients had bulbar VKC, followed by mixed VKC. The study’s findings agreed with those of Alemayehu AM et al., with mixed type of VKC of about 53.1% followed by palpebral type of VKC of about 43.8% (15). In a study conducted by Ujwala S et al., showed 72% of mixed type VKC (14). Dry eye was shown to co-occur in VKC patients as determined by the TBUT test, with mild dry eye detected in maximum cases and severe dry eye in least cases. In the current study, mild dry eye was defined as a TBUT of 10 seconds or less, moderate dry eye as a TBUT of 5-10 seconds, and severe dry eye as a TBUT of less than five seconds (14). Villani E et al., studies revealed that VKC cases had a deranged TBUT rather than a lack of tearing. They found that the TBUT time reduced to 6.31±2.60 seconds in their cases as compared to controls, who had 13.37±2.93 seconds (16).

Another study by Tibrewal S et al., found that, TBUT was lower in VKC children with TBUT around (8.8±4.5 secs) as compared to the controls, which was 10.8±5.5 seconds. In the same study, the non invasive TBUT was found to be low but not statistically significant, (7±3 secs vs 8±2 secs). Thus, their study found that children with VKC had more prevalence of dry eyes and lower TBUT (17). Based on the Schirmer’s test values, it was found that mild dry eye in most of cases, followed by moderate dry eye in 6.06%, and no dry eye in 69.69% of the cases. Thus, it was found that only moderate and mild dry eye were recorded, with maximum patients showing on dry eye. It was found that there was a statistically significant association with a p-value <0.001 when compared type of VKC with type of dry eye, in accordance with TBUT where it was found that the dry eye was more of mild type, predominantly seen in mixed type of VKC (17).

It was also noticed that it was a statistically significant association with p-value <0.001, when compared the type of VKC with type of dry eye in accordance with Schirmer’s test, where in it was found that mild type of dry eye was predominantly seen in mixed type of VKC. Thus, the dry eye was significantly seen to be associated with mixed type of vernal conjunctivitis. Study by Villani E et al., showed association between short TBUT dry eyes and VKC (16), and also a study by Tibrewal S et al., showed prevalence of dry eye in accordance to dry eye tests like Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), TBUT and Ocular Surface analyser (OSA). However, none of the studies compared the type of VKC with the severity of dry, as done in this study (17). Thus, dry eyes are found to be present in VKC cases, and treatment should take account of this for better patient outcome.

Limitation(s)

The lack of follow-up of the study population and small sample size are the limitations of the study. Hence, studies with a larger sample size can be conducted in future.

Conclusion

The present study highlighted the co-existence of dry eye with VKC. There was a significant association of dry eye with VKC and type of VKC as well. VKC is an under diagnosed and under recognised ocular surface disease, this is because the clinical form is generally mild and self-limiting, and access to care varies significantly, meaning that many patients do not present to a clinic. If VKC is not treated properly, the cornea and conjunctiva may suffer substantial damage and potential for visual impairment. VKC treatment should be adequate and continuous through patient or caregivers education on good ocular health and regular, long-term follow-up are essential. The treatment of VKC should also include the management of dry eye without which the ocular surface may never improve completely. Further studies on medical management of the VKC associated dry eye can be persued.

References

1.
Dog? an Ü, Ag? ca S. Investigation of possible risk factors in the development of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018;11(9):1508-13.
2.
Singhal D, Sahay P, Maharana PK, Raj N, Sharma N, Titiyal JS. Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2019;64(3):289-311. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Addis H, Jeng BH. Vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:119-23. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Leonardi A. Management of vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Ophthalmol Ther. 2013;2(2):73-88. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, Caffery B, Dua HS, Joo CK, et al. TFOS DEWS II definition and classification report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):276-83. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Clayton JA. Dry eye. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(23):2212-23. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Javadi MA, Feizi S. Dry eye syndrome. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2011;6(3):192-98.
8.
Hom MM, Nguyen AL, Bielory L. Allergic conjunctivitis and dry eye syndrome. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012;108(3):163-66. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Hu Y, Matsumoto Y, Dogru M, Okada N, Igarashi A, Fukagawa K, et al. The differences of tear function and ocular surface findings in patients with atopic keratoconjunctivitis and vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Allergy. 2007;62(8):917-25. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Goto T, Zheng X, Okamoto S, Ohashi Y. Tear film stability analysis system. Introducing a new application for videokeratoscopy. Cornea. 2004;23(8):65-70. Doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000136685.88489.70 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Vidas Pauk S, Petric? ek I, Jukic´ T, Popovic´ -Suic´ S, Tomic´ M, Kalauz M, et al. Non invasive tear film break-up time assessment using handheld lipid layer examination instrument. Acta Clin Croat. 2019;58(1):63-71. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Tears and Contact Lenses. In: Craig PJ, Downie EL. Contact. Contact lens. Elseiver Publications (sixth Edition), 2019. Pg. 97-116. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Aaron M, Solley WA, Broocker G. Primary care ophthalmology. Second Edition. 2005. Mosby ELSEVIER. pages 1-23. [crossref]
14.
Saboo US, Jain M, Reddy JC, Sangwan VS. Demographic and clinical profile of vernal keratoconjunctivitis at a tertiary eye care center in India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013;61(9):486-89. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Alemayehu AM, Yibekal BT, Fekadu SA. Prevalence of vernal keratoconjunctivitis and its associated factors among children in Gambella town, southwest Ethiopia, June 2018. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):e0215528.[crossref][PubMed]
16.
Villani E, Strologo MD, Pichi F, Luccarelli SV, De Cilla S, Serafino M, et al. Dry eye in vernal keratoconjunctivitis: A cross-sectional comparative study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(42):e1648. Doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001648. PMID: 26496269; PMCID: PMC4620765. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Tibrewal S, Gour A, Rahman M, Ganesh S, Sangwan V. Evaluation of dry eye in pediatric vernal-keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) using clinical tests and non-invasive ocular surface analyser (OSA). Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2021;62(8):3455.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/61475.18189

Date of Submission: Nov 15, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jan 05, 2023
Date of Acceptance: May 05, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 30, 2022
• Manual Googling: Mar 14, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Apr 29, 2023 (20%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 9

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com