Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 39064

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : July | Volume : 17 | Issue : 7 | Page : LC18 - LC22 Full Version

Social Phobia, Hospital Phobia and Hospital Anxiety among Transgender Individuals at a Community Centre in Chennai, South India: A Mixed Method Study


Published: July 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/64686.18206
R Divya, Aparna Menon, S Abeetha

1. Associate Professor, Department of Physiology, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital, Siruvachur, Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital, Siruvachur, Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Physiology, ACS Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Aparna Menon,
Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital, Siruvachur, Perambalur-621113, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: aparnamenon7@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Stigma and discrimination within the healthcare sector in general may impact transgender people’s desire and ability to access appropriate medical treatment. The transgender community have specific healthcare needs which may go untreated leading to increased disease burden in the community. In India there is a gap in understanding the factors affecting utilisation of health services by transgender community.

Aim: To determine the factors affecting presence of social, hospital phobia and anxiety among transgender individuals at a Transgender Community Centre in south India, and to understand the perspective of the community members on using healthcare services.

Materials and Methods: The present quantitative component embedded within a qualitative study was conducted in the Department of Physiology, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital (DSMCH) (Community Centre), Siruvachur, Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India for two days, during the month of August 2022 among 24 transgender adults. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with the group for the qualitative part of the study during two consecutive days in August 2022, and quantitative part was analysed within the same group using three questionnaires for social phobia, hospital phobia and hospital anxiety. Age-wise and gender-wise distribution of scores in social phobia, hospital phobia and hospital anxiety were analysed using Mann-Whitney U tests as the data was not normally distributed.

Results: Out of the 24 participants, 20 (83.33%) were in the age-group of 18-35 years and 18 (75%) identified themselves as transfemales. Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interview found prevalence of gender-based discrimination and mistreatment at hospitals faced by transgender individuals leading to fear of hospitals. Out of 24, nine participants had hospital-related anxiety score more than four out of nine. Social phobia score out of 36 was given and the highest score was 27, with a mean score of 11.416±8.445. Hospital phobia score out of 32 was given and mean score was 13±6.041.

Conclusion: Transgender individuals feel hesitant to approach hospitals due to the discrimination they have faced and continue to face at hospitals. There is a need to make the hospitals a more inclusive space for them.

Keywords

Discrimination, Healthcare access, Hospital stigma, Medical treatment, Transfemale

Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer,+ is the short form for LGBTQ+ community (1). Transgender people are a group for whom, their gender identity differs from their sex assigned at birth. The transgender population is diverse and consists of transgender women (assigned male at birth who identify as female), and transgender men (assigned female at birth who identify as male). Available data suggest that transgender people are at significantly higher risk for several negative health corollaries in comparison with cisgender people (2). Even with recent advancements in this field, the issue of discrimination towards gender and sexual minorities remains high globally (3).

The situation in India is not much different either (4). Due to societal and family struggles from lack of acceptance individuals of LGBTQ+community are facing a large amount of stress and anxiety in their day-to-day life. Studies conducted globally have shown that the prevalence of mental health issues, such as anxiety, depression, suicidal tendencies and substance use, are very high among the LGBTQ+community (5),(6),(7). The discrimination faced by the LGBTQ+community can be responsible for mental health issues faced by them. Health-related inequalities are found in high frequency among transgender community. The various accounts of transgender community signifies to their experience of stigma and discrimination within the healthcare apparatus (8).

Transgender patients report that the lack of providers with expertise in transgender medicine represents the single largest component inhibiting access (9). Studies show that compared to the cisgender population, the transgender people combat health inequality in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), mental health issues, and substance use treatments (10),(11),(12). A national study conducted in New Zealand on the health and well-being in the transgender population found that more than one third of the study participants from the transgender community avoided visiting a clinician/healthcare provider due to disrespect or mistreatment apprehensions (13). In the transgender community, hospital phobia is linked to their victimisation. The same prejudices and discrimination from the society is also shown by hospital staff toward transgender patients, making them scared of going to hospitals even in serious health issues (14).

These factors usually lead to transgender individuals being reluctant to take medical help, as required. There is a need to understand the level of hospital phobia and social phobia in life of transgender individuals in India, in order to address the issue and find tangible solutions (15),(16),(17). Hence, the present study was conducted to understand the factors affecting social and hospital phobia among the transgender individuals attending a community centre in South India and also to understand the perspective of the community members on using healthcare services available to them using in-depth interviews along with quantitative scoring done with help of questionnaires to understand the degree of the problem.

Material and Methods

The present quantitative component embedded within a qualitative study was conducted in the Department of Physiology, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital (Community Centre), Siruvachur, Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India, for two days, during the month of August 2022 at the community centre in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. The study was commenced after obtaining ethical clearance from Institutional Ethics Committee, DSMCH, Perambalur (IECHS/IRCHS/no.163) and was conducted according to the guidelines of Helsinki Declaration after obtaining informed consent from all participants. Volunteers were recruited based on convenient sampling from the community centre. After explaining the study 24 individuals consented to participate in the study.

Inclusion criteria: Participants aged between 18 years and 80 years, who self-identificated as member of transgender community were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Participants, aged <18 years and unwilling to give consent to participate were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

The qualitative part of the study was done using in-depth interviews based on semi-structured questionnaire framed by the investigators by reviewing the literature, and by taking input from Non Governmental Organisations (NGOs) and community members [16,17]. Semi-structured interview included open-ended questions to which the participant response was recorded and key phrases were analysed. The responses were recorded in audio format as well as simultaneous note taken by the investigators. Investigator notes were used to assess data saturation from the interview themes. Reliability testing was not done as the question were open-ended and results could not be scored. Themes and questions used in semi-structured interview is provided in (Table/Fig 1).

The quantitative part of the study consisted of questionnaire, framed based on previous studies on hospital phobia and was used to conduct structured interviews with the participants (18),(19),(20),(21). The questionnaire consisted of three areas: social phobia, hospital phobia and hospital anxiety. It consisted of nine questions in social phobia scores, eight questions in hospital phobia scores and eight questions in hospital anxiety scores. Social and hospital phobia was assessed on a Likert scale of 5 (0-not at all to 4- extremely) and hospital anxiety was assessed in Yes/No (No-0 and Yes-1) format. Questionnaire reliability could not be checked using statistical analysis due to low sample size. However, the questions were validated by experts peer review and review by NGOs and community members. The answers were recorded in Microsoft excel sheet in the computers used by investigators. The interviews were recorded after obtaining informed consent from all participants and the responses were used to analyse keywords for the purposes of the study. The structured interview used statements to which the participant could respond using Likert scale and the total scores were analysed. Less than 25% of the total scores were considered as minimally present, 25-50% scores were considered as moderately present and more than 50% were considered as severe for all three questionnaires, based on the data obtained.

Statistical Analysis

Data were statistically analysed using Microsoft excel and GraphPad Prism 7 software. Age-wise and gender-wise distribution of scores in social phobia, hospital phobia and hospital anxiety were analysed using Mann-Whitney U tests as the data was not normally distributed. Analysis of keywords in the semi-structured interview was done by analysing the interviews for keywords by all the investigators separately and then finalising the keywords and phrases in a consensus meeting. The appearance of keywords was used to analyse patterns and frame results.

Results

Total 24 transgender individuals participated in the study, of which 18 (75%) were transfemale, three were transmale and three were trans-non binary. The majority (n=12, 50%) of participants were in 18-25 years of age, followed by 8 (33.3%) aged between 26-35 years (Table/Fig 2).

In the present study, the mean scores were spread over a wide range with relatively lower scores for social phobia compared to hospital phobia and hospital anxiety (Table/Fig 3).

The mean scores were compared among different age groups and was found statistically non significant. Social phobia was found to be higher in the younger age group, hospital phobia and hospital anxiety scores were found to be higher in the older age groups. No significant difference was found in gender-wise distribution of social phobia, hospital phobia and hospital anxiety scores as the number of participants were limited in transmale and trans-non binary categories (Table/Fig 4). Qualitative study was done using open-ended questions framed by the investigators and the participant responses were recorded. Based on the responses the frequency of repeating keywords and themes were found as represented in (Table/Fig 5).

The open-ended interview questions have revealed a few recurring patterns to the experience of transgender individuals in a hospital. The authors found that 11 out of 24 participants resort to self-medication sometimes. Of the 24 participants, five feel unsafe in all types of hospitals, while seven feel comfortable in all types of hospitals. Majority of participants recounted experiences of emotional or physical harm at a hospital. A total of 14 of 24 participants have faced verbal assault in the form of use of unsavoury language and calling derogatory names to transgender individuals. of the 24 participants, five have faced physical abuse from hospital staff and six participants have faced sexual assaults in a hospital setting.

Ten of the 24 participants recollected having been discriminated against by doctors themselves at a healthcare setting because of their gender. Nine participants have faced discriminatory behaviour from nursing staff and four have recollected stories of harassment by fellow patients in wards. In the present study, seven participants have faced depression and 9 of 24 participants reported thoughts of self-harm as a direct consequence of their experiences in a healthcare setting. Seven participants felt they could not reveal the history of mental health issues or sexual assault to their healthcare providers for fear of discrimination. Fifteen participants felt they would reveal sensitive personal history such as substance use, mental health issue or sexual assault as they considered it best to inform their providers of all the facts irrespective of their fear of discrimination.

A participant (transfemale of age group 36-45 years) stated that “It is important for doctors to know exactly what happened. Otherwise how can they give correct treatment. I would tell them everything”. A participant (transfemale 26-35-year-old) said “If I don’t tell them (doctors) about smoking or drinking they might give some medicine that smokers or alcoholics are not meant to take. That would be risky”. A participant (transmale, 18-25-year-old) said “if the doctor says the sickness could be related to some substance use or some mental health issues then we have to tell them everything”. While, a participant (transfemale 18-25-year-old) said “If I tell them (hospital staff) that I drink sometimes or there was some sexual assault by a partner they think I am a bad person and they might scold me or send me out”.

Discussion

The present study found that transgender community faces a variety of discriminatory and abusive experiences at the hospitals in South India. The participants mostly constituted younger age group (18-35 years) transfemale population and because of that there was no significant differences found in age-wise or gender-wise analysis of the scores from questionnaires used in the quantitative part of the study. There is a trend of self-medication among the community members rising from the discomfort in visiting hospitals. Similar studies have also found an increasing number of transgender individuals being averse to approaching healthcare settings for care (3),(16).

The present study also found that majority of the participants have faced some form of discrimination at the hospital, which was mostly from the hospital staff and sometimes from the fellow patients, which is also similar to findings from other studies around the globe. The 2015 US survey of the transgender community found that 33% faced gender-based discrimination while attending a healthcare facility (22). In India, previous studies have found that similar barriers are faced by transmen trying to access healthcare settings (23). The present study also found high rate of abuse and harm faced by the transgender community members at hospitals ranging from verbal, physical to sexual abuse. A lot of the mistreatment faced by the transgender community is found to stem from the ignorance of healthcare professionals (24). Multiple studies have found that discrimination and harassment at hospitals have kept transgender individuals from receiving necessary healthcare services on time (25),(26),(27). It has been previously found that there is a general perception of uncertainty among healthcare providers, when it comes to the care of transgender individuals which in turn is mirrored in the attitude of transgender patients in approaching healthcare providers (28).

All of such findings point to the fact that there is a clear need for improved accessibility of healthcare services to transgender individuals in India. The need for healthcare access is even more pronounced in transgender individuals undergoing gender-affirming care. They are in need of continuous medical care and supervision throughout the transitioning process and require regular follow-ups, not to mention the need for ongoing psychological support (29). When they are faced with mistreatment in such conditions it discourages the transgender patients from continuing their transitioning process, or much worse end up in the hands of un-qualified individuals (30).

The older individuals of the community centre seemed more optimistic about the situation rather than the younger generation of transgender individuals. This could be because of rules being framed for justice towards the LGBTQ+community and the general increase in awareness among the public due to social media and mass media over the years. They feel that some of the government and private initiatives to assist in gender affirmative therapy in the select few institutes across the country itself is a huge improvement over what existed a decade or two ago. They also were happy with one odd hospital which had transgender wards in the hospital for gender assignment treatments which helped them escape the harassment faced in general wards.

Older community members are hopeful of the changes that are already happening in the healthcare services with few hospitals offering gender affirming care. Recent legislations and policy changes have made a positive impact in delivering care to transgender community (31). The present study was limited to transgender population residing in an urban area with plenty of options for healthcare services. The results may vary in a rural area with limited availability of healthcare and less number of hospitals specialised in transgender healthcare. Rural areas typically have higher chances of discrimination and hence more hesitancy to access health services (32).

Even though it is common in India for the general public as well to resort to self-medication in mild illness about 45% of the interviewed transgender individuals feel that self-medication is easier than approaching a healthcare setting for any illness. There is a clear preference for private hospitals compared to government run hospitals, where the participants feel lack of privacy and rude behaviour of the staff. This has also been stated as a reason for the preference for private hospitals, where they can avail of private rooms than be accommodated in a ward with other patients where there is risk of mistreatment. Even though some of them may resort to self-medication occasionally overall the interviewed population seemed aware of the harms of not visiting a healthcare professional in time. They had all stated that inspite of their worst experiences at hospitals they would still look for a safe hospital to go to in case of a health necessity. This could also be specific to the group that was interviewed who were at the community centre in a major city, where a lot of social and healthcare workers were in contact with the transgender community, leading to better awareness than their counterparts in smaller towns or villages. Issues of self-medication and preference for hospitals with private wards concur with the experience of discrimination from hospital staff as well as fellow patients and needs to be addressed in a policy level. Similar findings are seen in study done by Arora L et al., and suggest that inclusive policies and training at a hospital level can tackle the problem (33).

There is a growing need to create safe spaces in government and private hospitals for transgender individuals in India. The few places already offering gender affirming care and transgender-friendly clinics are situated in big cities and population centres which may be inaccessible to many of the transgender individuals in villages or smaller towns. Making a queer-friendly primary healthcare system that can be accessed by transgender individuals at all towns and areas where transgender community members reside needs to be a long-term goal in order to improve the standard of life and healthcare access to them.

Limitation(s)

The present study was conducted as a qualitative interview-based study with a quantitative component embedded in it. A focused quantitative study could better predict the incidence and prevalence of hospital phobia among transgender community. Sample size for the study was 24, which is too low to predict significant statistical outcomes from the quantitative part of the study. The reliability and validity of the social phobia, hospital phobia and hospital anxiety scores could not be measured accurately due to the low sample size. The study participants were all recruited from the same community centre at a city in South India, which may not be representative of the transgender population from other smaller urban or rural settings.

Conclusion

The transgender community feels hesitant to approach hospitals owing to the variety of challenges they face at the hands of hospital staff and fellow patients. When appropriate measures are taken to create transgender-friendly spaces, there is increased interest in accessing healthcare. This clarifies the need for creating more safe spaces and gender-friendly clinics to make sure that the transgender community receives the medical services they deserve. A study should be conducted among the rural transgender population with large sample size, which may yield different results and could help in developing targeted policies. Continued experience of harassment and discrimination in public spheres and healthcare settings has a negative impact on the mental health of the transgender community, further exacerbating the need for safe spaces for positive coping. Healthcare providers need training and awareness to reduce the stigma faced by the transgender community in their care.

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge all the members of Thozhi Community Centre, Chennai, India who enthusiastically participated in the study.

References

1.
Divya R, Menon A. Transgender healthcare and Indian medical students: Is curricular revamping the need of the hour? Chettinad Health City Med J. 2022;54(1):16-20. Doi: 10.24321/2278.2044.202204. [crossref]
2.
Newcomb ME, Hill R, Buehler K, Ryan DT, Whitton SW, Mustanski B. High burden of mental health problems, substance use, violence, and related psychosocial factors in transgender, non-binary, and gender diverse youth and young adults. Arch Sex Behav. 2020;49(2):645-59. Doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01533-9. Epub 2019 Aug 14. PMID: 31485801; PMCID: PMC7018588. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Chong L, Kerklaan J, Clarke S, Kohn M, Baumgart A, Guha C, et al. Experiences and perspectives of transgender youths in accessing healthcare: A systematic review. JAMA paediatrics. 2021;175(11):1159-73. https://Doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.2061. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Pandya A, Redcay A. Access to health services: Barriers faced by the transgender population in India. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health. 2021;25(2):132-54. Doi: 10.1080/19359705.2020.1850592. [crossref]
5.
Rees SN, Crowe M, Harris S. The lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender communities’ mental healthcare needs and experiences of mental health services: An integrative review of qualitative studies. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2021;28(4):578-89. Doi: 10.1111/jpm.12720. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Bhugra D, Killaspy H, Kar A, Levin S, Chumakov E, Rogoza D, et al. IRP commission: Sexual minorities and mental health: Global perspectives. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2022;34(3-4):171-99. Doi: 10.1080/09540261.2022.2045912. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
2022 National Survey on LGBTQ Youth Mental Health. The Trevor Project. Published on 2022. Accessed on April 30, 2023. https://www.thetrevorproject.org/survey-2022/assets/static/trevor01_2022survey_final.pdf.
8.
Reisner SL, Chaudhry A, Cooney E, Garrison-Desany H, Juarez-Chavez E, Wirtz AL. It all dials back to safety: A qualitative study of social and economic vulnerabilities among transgender women participating in HIV research in the USA. BMJ open. 2020;10(1):e029852. https://Doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029852. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Kcomt L, Gorey KM, Barrett BJ, McCabe SE. Healthcare avoidance due to anticipated discrimination among transgender people: A call to create trans-affirmative environments, SSM-Population Health. 2020;11:100608. https://Doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100608. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Boonyapisomparn N, Manojai N, Srikummoon P, Bunyatisai W, Traisathit P, Homkham N. Healthcare discrimination and factors associated with gender-affirming healthcare avoidance by transgender women and transgender men in Thailand: findings from a cross-sectional online-survey study. Int J Equity Health. 2023;22(1):31. Doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01843-4. PMID: 36782169; PMCID: PMC9926841. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Schulman JK, Erickson-Schroth L. Mental health in sexual minority and transgender women. Med Clin North Am. 2019;103(4):723-33. Doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2019.02.00. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Mueller SC, De Cuypere G, T’Sjoen G. Transgender research in the 21st century: A selective critical review from a neurocognitive perspective. Am J Psychiatry. 2017;174(12):1155-62. Doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17060626. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Allory E, Duval E, Caroff M, Kendir C, Magnan R, Brau B, et al. The expectations of transgender people in the face of their health-care access difficulties and how they can be overcome. A qualitative study in France. Prim Healthcare Res Dev. 2020;16(21):e62. Doi: 10.1017/S1463423620000638. PMID: 33323162; PMCID: PMC7801925. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Kattari SK, Bakko M, Langenderfer-Magruder L, Holloway BT. Transgender and nonbinary experiences of victimization in healthcare. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2021;36(23-24):NP13054-76. https://Doi.org/10.1177/0886260520905091. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Chakrapani V, Newman PA, Shunmugam M, Dubrow R. Barriers to free antiretroviral treatment access among kothi-identified men who have sex with men and aravanis (transgender women) in Chennai, India, AIDS Care. 2011;23(12):1687-94. Doi: 10.1080/09540121.2011.582076. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Kelley J. Stigma and human rights: Transgender discrimination and its influence on patient health. Prof Case Manag. 2021;26(6):298-303. Doi: 10.1097/NCM.0000000000000506. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Goldenberg T, Reisner SL, Harper GW, Gamarel KE, Stephenson R. State policies and healthcare use among transgender people in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2020;59(2):247-59. Doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.01.030. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Walker J, van Niekerk M, Hobbs H, Toynbee M, Magill N, Bold R, et al. The prevalence of anxiety in general hospital inpatients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2021;72:131-40. Doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2021.08.004. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Tyrer P. Why health anxiety needs to be recognised in hospital practice. Clin Med (Lond). 2020;20(3):339-42. Doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0346. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Butler RM, Horenstein A, Gitlin M, Testa RJ, Kaplan SC, Swee MB, et al. Social anxiety among transgender and gender nonconforming individuals: The role of gender-affirming medical interventions. J Abnorm Psychol. 2019;128(1):25-31. Doi: 10.1037/abn0000399. Epub 2018 Nov 29. PMID: 30489112. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Seelman KL, Colón-Diaz MJP, LeCroix RH, Xavier-Brier M, Kattari L. Transgender noninclusive healthcare and delaying care because of fear: Connections to general health and mental health among transgender adults. Transgender Health. 2017;2(1):17-28. http://Doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2016.0024. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Grant JM, Mottet LA, Tanis J. National Transgender Discrimination Survey Report on Health and Healthcare. Washington, DC: National Center for Transgender Equality and the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (2010). Published 2011. Accessed Jan 30, 2023. http://www.thetaskforce.org/static_html/downloads /reports/reports/ntds_full.pdf.
23.
Raj A, Juned F. Gendered identities and digital inequalities: An exploration of the lived realities of the transgender community in the Indian digital welfare state. Gender & Development. 2022;30(3):531-49. Doi: 10.1080/13552074.2022.2131250. [crossref]
24.
Floyd MJ, Martin O, Eckloff KJ. A qualitative study of transgender individuals’ experiences of healthcare including radiology. Radiography (Lond). 2020;26(2):e38- e44. Doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2019.10.008. Epub 2019 Nov 1. PMID: 32052776. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Lyons T, Shannon K, Pierre L, Small W, Krüsi A, Kerr T. A qualitative study of transgender individuals’ experiences in residential addiction treatment settings: Stigma and inclusivity. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2015;10(1):01-06. Doi: 10.1186/s13011-015-0015-4. PMID: 25948286; PMCID: PMC4432520. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Gamariel F, Isaakidis P, Tarquino IAP, Beirão JC, O’Connell L, Mulieca N, et al. Access to health services for men who have sex with men and transgender women in Beira, Mozambique: A qualitative study. PLoS One. 2020;15(1):e0228307. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228307. PMID: 31999760; PMCID: PMC6992190. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Tun W, Pulerwitz J, Shoyemi E, Fernandez A, Adeniran A, Ejiogu F, et al. A qualitative study of how stigma influences HIV services for transgender men and women in Nigeria. J Int AIDS Soc. 2022;25(Suppl 1):e25933. Doi: 10.1002/ jia2.25933. PMID: 35818868; PMCID: PMC9274359. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Poteat T, German D, Kerrigan D. Managing uncertainty: A grounded theory of stigma in transgender healthcare encounters. Soc Sci Med. 2013;84:22-29. Doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.02.019. Epub 2013 Feb 19. PMID: 23517700. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
van Leerdam TR, Zajac JD, Cheung AS. The effect of gender-affirming hormones on gender dysphoria, quality of life, and psychological functioning in transgender individuals: A systematic review. Transgend Health. 2023;8(1):06-21. Doi: 10.1089/ trgh.2020.0094. PMID: 36895312; PMCID: PMC9991433. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Silva ED, Fighera TM, Allgayer RM, Lobato MIR, Spritzer PM. Physical and sociodemographic features associated with quality of life among transgender women and men using gender-affirming hormone therapy. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:621075. Doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.621075. PMID: 34381383; PMCID: PMC8350045. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Pandey N. Free gender reassignment surgeries soon at govt. hospitals under new transgender rights rules. The Print. Published on 8 June 2020. Accessed on 16 May 2023. https://theprint.in/india/governance/free-gender-reassignment-surgeries-soon-at-govt-hospitals-under-new-transgender-rights-rules/437561/.
32.
Renner J, Blaszcyk W, Täuber L, Dekker A, Briken P, Nieder TO. Barriers to accessing healthcare in rural regions by transgender, non-binary, and gender diverse people: A case-based scoping review. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:717821. Doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.717821. PMID: 34867775; PMCID: PMC8637736. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Arora L, Bhujang PM, Sivakami M. Understanding discrimination against LGBTQIA+ patients in Indian hospitals using a human rights perspective: An exploratory qualitative study. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2022;29(2):38-54. Doi: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2104678.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/64686.18206

Date of Submission: Apr 13, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Apr 27, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jun 17, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 15, 2023
• Manual Googling: May 16, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jun 08, 2023 (17%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com