Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 36148

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2023 | Month : July | Volume : 17 | Issue : 7 | Page : ER06 - ER10 Full Version

Low-grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm: A Series of Four Cases


Published: July 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/63453.18232
Chandan Chowdhuri, Ashwinkumar K Barsagade, Sivaganesh Alias Porko, Avnika Jasuja, Suparna Dubey

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Andaman and Nicobar Islands Institute of Medical Sciences, Port Blair, Andaman and Nicobar, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Andaman and Nicobar Islands Institute of Medical Sciences, Port Blair, Andaman and Nicobar, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Andaman and Nicobar Islands Institute of Medical Sciences, Port Blair, Andaman and Nicobar, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Andaman and Nicobar Islands Institute of Medical Sciences, Port Blair, Andaman and Nicobar, India. 5. Professor and Head, Department of Pathology, Andaman and Nicobar Islands Institute of Medical Sciences, Port Blair, Andaman and Nicobar, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Avnika Jasuja,
Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Andaman and Nicobar Islands Institute of Medical Sciences, Port Blair-744101, Andaman and Nicobar, India.
E-mail: avnikajasuja@gmail.com

Abstract

Low-grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm (LAMN) is a rare malignant neoplasm seen in less than 0.3% of appendectomy specimens. Patients with LAMN can present with abdominal pain, mimicking appendicitis clinically. In later stages, it can rupture, leading to Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). Therefore, a high clinical suspicion is needed for correct diagnosis and management. The prognosis of LAMN depends on the presence or absence of mucin/neoplastic epithelium outside the appendix. For LAMN confined to the appendix, appendectomy alone is sufficient for management, with conservative follow-up. For LAMN with extruded acellular mucin localised to the appendiceal serosa, management involves appendectomy and PMP surveillance. For all mucinous lesions of the appendix, it is essential to submit the entire appendix for histopathologic examination, thoroughly evaluating the presence of mucin/neoplastic epithelium involving the serosa/extra appendiceal tissue for accurate staging and to predict the risk of recurrence and determine further management. Here four cases of LAMN due to their rarity and clinical importance is presented. This study of four cases emphasises that the clinical diagnosis of this rare malignancy is difficult, and radiological investigations were not available as these patients presented with clinical features mimicking appendicitis. Emergency appendectomy was performed in all cases. LAMN should be considered as a differential diagnosis because if not diagnosed and treated in the early stages, it can lead to dreaded complications like PMP. The histopathological examination of all four cases of LAMN showed dissecting acellular mucin in various stages of progression in the appendicular wall, but none involving the serosa. This highlights the importance of timely surgical intervention and histopathological examination for an exact diagnosis and staging of LAMN for further follow-up or treatment.

Keywords

Appendicectomy, Mucin, Pseudomyxoma peritonei

LAMN is a rare malignant neoplasm, accounting for 1% of gastrointestinal neoplasms and is found in <0.3% of appendectomy specimens (1). This rare malignancy is most commonly discovered incidentally during operative exploration and is often diagnosed late. It can also present with symptoms such as abdominal pain, vomiting, abdominal distention, mass lesion, or intestinal obstruction. In rare cases, urological findings such as haematuria, ureteral obstruction, hydronephrosis, and urinary tract infection may occur (1),(2),(3). LAMN often presents similarly to acute appendicitis due to appendix distension, and a definitive diagnosis can only be made through histopathological examination of the appendix (4). Ultrasound of the abdomen is considered the primary diagnostic modality for appendiceal lesions, which can potentially differentiate between benign and malignant lesions (5). LAMNs typically appear as cystic, thin-walled, fluid-filled structures with or without calcifications in the appendix wall (6). Tumour marker tests, including Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) and Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA-19.9), should be included in the lab work-up (7). Research has shown that these tumour markers are more useful as predictive indicators of recurrence rather than diagnostic biomarkers (8). This appendix tumour presents serious complications, including the risk of appendix rupture and the spread of mucin and neoplastic cells into the peritoneum, leading to PMP (2),(3). Peritoneal seeding typically occurs in the advanced stages of the disease.

In present case series, patients presented with vague appendicitis symptoms, and appendectomies were performed with a clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Histopathological examination of all four cases revealed LAMN with varying degrees of dissecting acellular mucin progression through the appendiceal wall but without involvement of the serosa. Histopathological diagnosis is crucial for staging the neoplasm and guiding further follow-up and treatment. Therefore, timely intervention is necessary to prevent LAMN dissemination and further progression to PMP.

Case Report

The study was conducted at the Department of Pathology of a tertiary care hospital. Out of 166 appendectomy specimens received in the Department of Pathology, Andaman & Nicobar Islands Institute of Medical Sciences, Portblair, Andaman & Nicobar, India from January 2021 to December 2022, four cases were diagnosed as LAMN, based on the World Health Organisation (WHO) diagnostic criteria (9).

Case 1

A 51-year-old female presented with a sudden onset of colicky pain in the right iliac fossa lasting for one day, accompanied by nausea, vomiting, and fever. She had a history of constant dull aching pain for one month, initially around the umbilicus and later shifting to the right iliac fossa. There was no history of dysphagia, constipation, or urinary symptoms. Physical examination revealed tenderness at the right lower quadrant and McBurney’s point. Complete blood count was within normal limits. Radiological investigations were not performed as emergency laparoscopic appendectomy was carried out.

Gross examination revealed an appendix measuring 4.5 cm in length with a grey-brown and congested external surface. On cut-section, a dilated lumen at the tip measuring 2.2 cm in diameter was observed, filled with mucinous material, and mild wall thickening measuring 0.4 to 0.6 cm. Gross examination did not reveal any evidence of perforation or extrusion of mucin (Table/Fig 1)a.

Histomorphology showed a mildly dilated lumen with extensive denudation of the lining epithelium, which was replaced by acellular pools of mucin with pushing invasive margins. This mucin was confined to the lamina propria. The subepithelium exhibited loss of lymphoid follicles and areas of congestion. There was no evidence of invasion into the muscularis propria (Table/Fig 1)b. No definite evidence of dysplasia in glandular epithelium or invasive malignancy was observed. The resected margin was free of mucin or tumour. The final diagnosis of LAMN (pTis-pathological tumor stage carcinoma in situ) was made, and the postoperative period was uneventful. The patient was discharged, and during regular follow-up after three months, the patient remained asymptomatic. Abdominal ultrasound showed no significant findings, and no further intervention was required.

Case 2

A 35-year-old female presented with right lower abdominal pain persisting for three weeks. Upon examination, a mass was palpated in the right lower quadrant. Laboratory investigations revealed elevated CEA levels. During the surgery, a large dilated appendix containing inspissated mucoid material was observed, leading to an open appendectomy.

Gross examination showed an 8 cm long appendix with a diameter of 2.5 cm. The external surface appeared congested. Upon sectioning, the entire lumen was found to be dilated and filled with mucoid material (Table/Fig 2)a. The wall thickness measured between 0.2 to 0.5 cm. No gross evidence of mucin perforation or extrusion was observed.

Histomorphology revealed that the appendix was partially lined by a villiform layer of pseudostratified columnar cells with elongated pencil-shaped nuclei displaying mild atypia (Table/Fig 2)b. Extensive denudation of the surface epithelium was observed, with acellular pools of mucin dissecting through the lamina propria into the fibrotic submucosal layer. The subepithelial tissue showed marked congestion, oedema, and chronic inflammatory infiltrate with loss of lymphoid follicles. Foci of dystrophic calcification were also present (Table/Fig 2)c. There was no evidence of high-grade nuclear features, intramural glandular epithelium, dissection of mucin into the muscularis propria, periappendiceal tissue, or serosa. The resected margin was free of mucin or tumour. The final diagnosis of LAMN (pTis) was made, and the postoperative period was 7uneventful. The patient was discharged, and during regular follow-up after three months, she remained asymptomatic. Abdominal ultrasound showed no significant findings, and no further intervention was required.

Case 3

A 50-year-old female presented with acute and sharp pain in the right lower abdomen. The patient had been experiencing dull constant pain in the periumbilical region for one month. Imaging studies were not performed due to the long waiting period in the busy emergency ultrasound setup of the limited resource facility. The patient underwent emergency laparoscopic appendectomy.

Gross examination revealed an appendix measuring 6.2 cm in length. The tip of the appendix was dilated, measuring 0.6 cm in diameter, and filled with mucoid material (Table/Fig 3)a. Histomorphology showed villous proliferation of mucinous epithelial cells in the tip of the appendix, displaying abundant apical mucin, elongated nuclei, low N:C ratio, and fine chromatin. The underlying subepithelium exhibited inflammatory cells and abundant extracellular mucin reaching the subserosa (Table/Fig 3)b. Multinucleated giant cells and foamy macrophages were also observed in the subserosal adipose tissue (Table/Fig 3)c. The resected margin was free of mucin or tumour. There was no evidence of high-grade nuclear features, glands, or mucinous epithelial cells in the serosa. The final diagnosis of LAMN (pT3) was made, and the postoperative period was uneventful. The patient was discharged, and during regular follow-up after three and six months, the patient remained asymptomatic. Abdominal ultrasound showed no significant findings, and no further intervention was required. The patient is currently on regular follow-up.

Case 4

A 37-year-old male presented with dull right lower abdominal pain persisting for two months, with recent worsening of symptoms and the pain becoming sharp. The patient underwent emergency open appendectomy. Imaging studies were not performed.

Gross examination revealed an appendix measuring 3 cm in length and 1.0 cm in diameter. The appendix appeared thickened and fibrosed (Table/Fig 4)a. Histomorphology showed a mildly dilated lumen with denudation of the lining epithelium. The lining was partially composed of a flat layer of columnar cells and replaced by acellular pools of mucin reaching until the muscularis propria (Table/Fig 4)b. The subepithelium exhibited loss of lymphoid follicles and areas of congestion. There was no definite evidence of dysplasia in the glandular epithelium or invasive malignancy. The resected margin was free of mucin or tumour. The final diagnosis of LAMN (pTis) was made, and the postoperative period was uneventful. The patient was discharged, and during regular follow-up after three months, the patient remained asymptomatic. Abdominal ultrasound showed no significant findings, and no further intervention was required.

A summary comparing the four cases is shown in (Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

LAMNs are rare gastrointestinal tract neoplasms that are often misdiagnosed as acute appendicitis. LAMNs commonly present with pain in the right iliac fossa, resembling acute or recurrent appendicitis. According to the 5th edition of the WHO classification of digestive system tumours (9), the histological criteria for LAMN in the appendix are a mucinous tumour with low-grade cytology and a pushing margin/invasion. High-Grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm (HAMN) in the appendix refers to a mucinous tumour with high-grade cytology and a pushing margin/invasion. Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma refers to high-grade appendiceal tumours with features of tissue invasion and irregular gland proliferation, often associated with stromal desmoplasia and signet ring cells.

LAMNs are a relatively homogeneous group of mucinous tumours with low-grade cytologic atypia, similar to low-grade dysplasia in other parts of the gastrointestinal tract (2). In later stages, LAMNs can rupture and disseminate as intraperitoneal mucinous tumours, which is associated with a poor prognosis (3).

Pai RK et al., first used the term “low-grade mucinous neoplasm with low risk of recurrence” if the mucin located outside the appendix was acellular, or “low-grade mucinous neoplasm with high risk of recurrence” if it contained neoplastic epithelium (10).

LAMNs should be differentiated from serrated lesions. LAMNs exhibit pushing infiltration with varying degrees of appendiceal wall fibrosis (11), whereas serrated lesions have intact mucosal muscle and no fibrosis. All patients in present case series exhibited different degrees of appendiceal fibrosis.

Present case series revealed that LAMNs were more likely to occur in adult females, which was consistent with previous reports (2),(11),(12),(13). The symptoms of LAMNs were mainly similar to appendicitis, presenting with lower abdominal pain. In a study by Bell PD et al., it was found that more than half of the patients were symptomatic, with abdominal pain being the most common presentation (13). The tip or the entire appendix was dilated to varying degrees. Calcification, as noted in one of the cases, is a good indication for the preoperative diagnosis of LAMNs by radiologists (10). However, no imaging was available in any of these cases.

The microscopic findings in all cases showed the appendix partially lined by a villiform layer of pseudostratified columnar cells or a flat layer of columnar cells with apical mucin. There were also instances of extensive denudation, covered by acellular pools of mucin, which dissected through the lamina propria into the fibrotic submucosal layer. In one case, extracellular mucin invaded the muscularis propria and reached the subserosa, resulting in pT3 staging. In a series of five cases by Wang AS et al., all cases were limited to the appendix, and one out of five cases (20%) had pT3 staging (14). A similar percentage was also found in the study by Misdraji J et al., (20%) (12). The underlying subepithelial tissue exhibited marked congestion, oedema, scattered chronic inflammatory infiltrate, and the loss of lymphoid follicles in all cases, which was consistent with the study by Misdraji J et al., (12). One case showed foci of dystrophic calcification. Calcification was found in 42% of cases in the study by Misdraji J et al., (12) and 50% of cases in the study by Bell PD et al., (13). Many multinucleated giant cells and foamy macrophages were also noted in one case of the present study. Pai RK and Longcare TA mentioned in a study of appendiceal mucinous tumours that extravasated mucin initiates a chronic inflammatory reaction associated with fibrosis, granulation tissue, and dystrophic calcification (15).

The surgical margins of the appendix were free of tumour in all four cases. In the study by Wang AS et al., all five cases of LAMN had tumour-free surgical margins (14), while Pai RK et al., and Bell PD et al., reported 9% and 6% of the cases, respectively, with positive surgical margins (10),(13). Three cases showed acellular mucin confined to the lamina propria and muscularis propria, resulting in a pathological staging of pTis (LAMN), and one case showed acellular mucin dissecting the muscularis propria and invading the subserosa, staged as pT3 (LAMN). In the present study, the majority (75%) of cases were confined to the muscularis (pTis), which was similar to the studies by Bell PD et al., (66%), Wong M et al., (61%), and Wang AS et al., (80%) (13),(14),(16).

A summary comparing the present case series with other studies is shown in (Table/Fig 6) (10),(12),(13),(14),(16).

In cases of LAMN confined to the appendix, appendectomy alone is the appropriate treatment since these tumours do not spread through lymphatics or haematogenous routes. However, in cases where the appendectomy margins are involved by acellular mucin or neoplastic epithelium, patients are managed through conservative follow-up and surveillance (2),(17). When acellular mucin is found on the surface of the appendix without spreading into the peritoneal cavity, an appendectomy is usually sufficient, along with routine follow-up and imaging to detect PMP (2),(18). Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is now recognised as the standard care for cases where appendiceal neoplasms have spread to the peritoneum (19),(20).

All four cases in the present study were limited to the appendix, and appendectomy alone was deemed sufficient as the standard treatment. No further management was required, and all cases had uneventful follow-up.

Conclusion

LAMN is a rare appendiceal mucinous tumor and prognosis is dependent on the presence or absence of extra appendiceal mucin and neoplastic epithelium. Evaluation of the appendix should be performed carefully to determine the prognosis and treatment of these tumours. Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms can rupture and lead to PMP with high-risk of mortality. For LAMN confined to the appendix, appendectomy alone is sufficient for management, with conservative follow-up and imaging if the margins involved by acellular mucin or neoplastic epithelium. For LAMN with extruded acellular mucin localised to the appendiceal serosa, management is done with appendectomy and PMP surveillance. This case series of LAMN suggests the importance of considering the possibility of appendiceal neoplasm in patients presenting with symptoms of acute appendicitis and timely intervention for management of such patients and preventing development of PMP.

References

1.
Padmanaban V, Morano WF, Gleeson E, Aggarwal A, Mapow BL, Stein DE, et al. Incidentally discovered low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm: A precursor to pseudomyxoma peritonei. Clin Case Rep. 2016;4(12):1112-16. Doi: 10.1002/ccr3.694. PMID: 27980743; PMCID: PMC5134204. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Misdraji J. Mucinous epithelial neoplasms of the appendix and pseudomyxoma peritonei. Mod Pathol. 2015;28Suppl 1:S67-79. Doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2014.129. PMID: 25560600. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Carr NJ, Sobin LH. Adenocarcinoma of the appendix. In: Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND, editors. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2010. Pp. 122-25.
4.
Matias-García B, Mendoza-Moreno F, Blasco-Martínez A, Busteros-Moraza JI, Diez-Alonso M, Garcia-Moreno Nisa F. A retrospective analysis and literature review of neoplastic appendiceal mucinous lesions. BMC Surg. 2021;21(1):79. Doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01091-9. PMID: 33573654; PMCID: PMC7877070. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Lien WC, Huang SP, Chi CL, Liu KL, Lin MT, Lai TI, et al. Appendiceal outer diameter as an indicator for differentiating appendiceal mucocele from appendicitis. Am J Emerg Med. 2006;24(7):801-05. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.04.003. PMID: 17098100. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Kehagias I, Zygomalas A, Markopoulos G, Papandreou T, Kraniotis P. Diagnosis and treatment of mucinous appendiceal neoplasm presented as acute appendicitis. Case Rep Oncol Med. 2016;2016:2161952. Doi: 10.1155/2016/2161952. Epub 2016 Mar 14. Erratum in: Case Rep Oncol Med. 2016;2016:3612014. PMID: 27066284; PMCID: PMC4808669.
7.
Al-Tarakji M, Ali SM, Shah AA, Petkar MA, Mirza S, Singh R, et al. A Unique case of low-grade mucinous neoplasm in stump appendectomy. Case Rep Surg. 2020;2020:8850403. Doi:10.1155/2020/8850403. PMID: 33014506; PMCID: PMC7512081. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Koh JL, Liauw W, Chua T, Morris DL. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) is an independent prognostic indicator in pseudomyxoma peritonei post cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2013;4(2):173-81. Doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2012.062. PMID: 23730513; PMCID: PMC3635178.
9.
Misdraji J, Carr NJ, Pai RK. Tumours of the Appendix. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Digestive System Tumours. 5th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2019. Pp. 144-46.
10.
Pai RK, Beck AH, Norton JA, Longacre TA. Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: Clinicopathologic study of 116 cases with analysis of factors predicting recurrence. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(10):1425-39. Doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181af6067. PMID: 19641451. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Carr NJ. Updates in appendix pathology: The precarious cutting edge. Surg Pathol Clin. 2020;13(3):469-84. Doi: 10.1016/j.path.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 Jul 11. PMID: 32773195.[crossref][PubMed]
12.
Misdraji J, Yantiss RK, Graeme-Cook FM, Balis UJ, Young RH. Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: A clinicopathologic analysis of 107 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27(8):1089-103. Doi: 10.1097/00000478-200308000-00006. PMID: 12883241. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Bell PD, Huber AR, Drage MG, Barron SL, Findeis-Hosey JJ, Gonzalez RS. Clinicopathologic features of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm: A single-institution experience of 117 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2020;44(11):1549- 55. Doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001551. PMID: 32796173. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Wang AS, Ismael HN, Parikh J, Modesto VL. Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm: A case series. Cureus. 2022;14(9):e28755. Doi: 10.7759/ cureus.28755. PMID: 36211097; PMCID: PMC9529292.
15.
Pai RK, Longacre TA. Appendiceal mucinous tumours and pseudomyxoma peritonei: Histologic features, diagnostic problems, and proposed classification. Adv Anat Pathol. 2005;12(6):291-311. Doi: 10.1097/01.pap.0000194625.05137.51. PMID: 16330927. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Wong M, Barrows B, Gangi A, Kim S, Mertens RB, Dhall D. Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: A single institution experience of 64 cases with clinical follow-up and correlation with the current (Eighth Edition) AJCC Staging. Int J Surg Pathol. 2020;28(3):252-58. Doi: 10.1177/1066896919883679. Epub 2019 Oct 24. PMID: 31645160. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Tiselius C, Kindler C, Shetye J, Letocha H, Smedh K. Computed tomography follow-up assessment of patients with low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: Evaluation of risk for pseudomyxoma peritonei. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(7):1778-82. Doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5623-3. Epub 2017 May 4. PMID: 28474197. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Gonzalez HH, Herard K, Mijares MC. A rare case of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm: A case report. Cureus. 2019;11(1):e3980. Doi: 10.7759/ cureus.3980. PMID: 30967980; PMCID: PMC6440557.
19.
Glasgow SC, Gaertner W, Stewart D, Davids J, Alavi K, Paquette IM, et al. The American Society of colon and rectal surgeons, clinical practice guidelines for the management of appendiceal neoplasms. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019;62(12):1425-38. Doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001530. PMID: 31725580. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Chicago Consensus Working Group. The Chicago Consensus on Peritoneal Surface Malignancies: Management of appendiceal neoplasms. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(6):175360. Doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08316-w. Epub 2020 Apr 13. PMID: 32285275.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63453.18232

Date of Submission: Feb 15, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Mar 31, 2023
Date of Acceptance: May 20, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 22, 2023
• Manual Googling: Apr 13, 2023
• iThenticate Software: May 17, 2023 (19%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com