Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 47928

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2023 | Month : July | Volume : 17 | Issue : 7 | Page : ER01 - ER05 Full Version

Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Metastasising to Unusual Sites: A Case Series of Four Cases


Published: July 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/63502.18209
Preeti Agrawal, Swarneet Bhamra, Rambir Singh, Ashish Pandey, Megha Shukla Pandey

1. Professor and Head, Department of Pathology, American International Institute of Medical Sciences, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, American International Institute of Medical Sciences, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, American International Institute of Medical Sciences, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, American International Institute of Medical Sciences, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India. 5. Professor, Department of Pathology, American International Institute of Medical Sciences, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Correspondence Address :
Ashish Pandey,
Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, American International Institute of Medical Sciences, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
E-mail: ashishpandey_789@yahoo.com

Abstract

Oral cancer ranks as the sixth most common malignancy worldwide, with Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) being the predominant type observed in the head and neck region. Incidence and mortality rates of SCC have significantly increased over the past few decades. Smoking and tobacco chewing are the most common aetiological factors, predominantly affecting elderly males. Distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis is a rare occurrence, typically disseminating through blood vessels or lymphatics. The lungs are the most frequent site for distant metastasis, followed by bone, mediastinal nodes, and occasionally the liver. However, in our cases, we observed metastasis to uncommon sites, excluding the liver. Accurate diagnosis necessitates the correlation with clinical history, radiological, histopathological, and immunohistochemical findings. Despite employing various surgical and radiotherapeutic modalities, distant metastasis diminishes the chances of survival, successful treatment, and worsens the prognosis. This article presents four cases of oral SCC that exhibited metastasis to unusual sites. Two cases had a primary tumour in the left lateral border of the tongue, with distant metastasis to the breast and skin (chest wall), while the other two cases had a primary tumour in the left buccal mucosa and left mandibular region, with distant metastasis to the kidney and liver.

Keywords

and neck tumours, Metastasis, Oral squamous cell carcinoma, Rare sites

Oral cancer is the sixth most common malignancy worldwide (1). It is the most common cancer among Indian males and the fourth most common among Indian women. According to Global Cancer Observatory (GLOBOCAN) data from 2020, there were 377,713 new cancer cases of the oral cavity and lip registered, with 177,757 new deaths worldwide, accounting for 1.8% of all cancer deaths (2). In the head and neck region, Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) is the most prevalent malignancy, accounting for over 90% of cases (3). The majority of cases are moderately or well-differentiated types (4). Loco-regional disease is common among such patients, with distant metastasis being a rare occurrence at the time of diagnosis (5). Approximately 40% of the cases show metastasis to lymph nodes (6), with cervical lymph nodes being commonly involved and reducing the survival rates by 50% (7). The most common site for distant metastasis is the lung, accounting for about 66% of cases, followed by the liver, mediastinal nodes, and bone (3),(8). This article presents four cases of oral SCC that exhibited metastasis to unusual sites.

Case Report

Case 1

A 50-year-old female patient presented to the Outpatient Department (OPD) with a complaint of an ulcerated lesion present over the left lateral border of the tongue for the past three months. Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography of the neck revealed an ill-defined malignant mass lesion measuring 60×40.3×50.4 mm, involving the left lateral border of the tongue, crossing the midline, and infiltrating up to the right lateral border of the tongue, left hyoid bone, left myelohyoid, digastric, and suprathyroid strap muscles, with bilateral cervical lymphadenopathy (Table/Fig 1)a. Biopsy results showed invasive nests and sheets of atypical polygonal cells, exhibiting round to oval pleomorphic nuclei with vesicular chromatin, prominent nucleoli, eosinophilic cytoplasm, and individual cell keratinisation. Due to the advanced stage at diagnosis, surgery was not performed. The patient received six cycles of chemotherapy and 35 cycles of radiotherapy. During the course of treatment, the patient noticed a lump in the left breast. Mammography revealed an irregular-shaped high-density mass lesion in the upper outer quadrant of the left breast with spiculated margins, distortion of breast parenchyma, and no microcalcification, consistent with Breast Imaging Reporting And Data System 5 (BI-RADS 5) (Table/Fig 1)b. Fine needle aspiration cytology study of the mass showed clusters and a few singly dispersed atypical polygonal cells with pleomorphic hyperchromatic nuclei and moderate amount of cytoplasm, suggesting a malignant lesion with the possibility of metastatic SCC (Table/Fig 1)c. The patient underwent a trucut biopsy, which revealed an invasive tumour surrounding the mammary ducts, composed of nests and sheets of atypical polygonal cells with moderately pleomorphic nuclei, vesicular chromatin, prominent nucleoli, eosinophilic glassy cytoplasm, along with single-cell keratinisation. A histopathological diagnosis of metastatic SCC was made (Table/Fig 1)d. The patient was planned for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, but her condition rapidly worsened, and she passed away.

Case 2

A 56-year-old male patient presented with a complaint of a mass in the oral cavity for the past month. The patient had a history of beedi smoking and tobacco chewing for 15 years. Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography revealed an ill-defined heterogeneously enhancing mass measuring 70x40.5x50 mm, involving the left buccal mucosa, left inferior and superior gingivobuccal sulcus, likely neoplastic mass with left cervical lymphadenopathy (Table/Fig 2)a. Biopsy results showed invasive nests and sheets of moderately pleomorphic atypical polygonal cells, exhibiting individual cell keratinisation and focal keratin pearl formation, consistent with the diagnosis of moderately differentiated Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC). The patient underwent left composite hemimandibulectomy with modified neck dissection, and a diagnosis of moderately differentiated SCC was confirmed. The patient was staged as pT4aN3b, with skin involvement and extracapsular extension. Frozen section margins were negative, and the patient was discharged with stable vitals. Four months after surgery, the patient complained of abdominal pain and underwent imaging studies, including a Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography scan, which revealed a hypermetabolic ill-defined heterogeneous enhancing soft tissue density lesion involving the lower pole of the left kidney, suggestive of metastasis (Table/Fig 2)b. A core needle biopsy from the same lesion was performed, showing the presence of invasive nests and sheets of atypical squamous epithelial cells, demonstrating moderate nuclear pleomorphism, moderate to abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm, individual cell keratinisation, and keratin pearl formation, suggesting a diagnosis of metastatic SCC (Table/Fig 2)c,d. The patient was then started on radiotherapy. However, during the course of treatment, the patient’s condition deteriorated markedly, and he passed away after receiving two cycles of radiotherapy.

Case 3

A 47-year-old male patient presented to the Outpatient Department (OPD) with complaints of an ulcer over the left lateral border of the tongue and difficulty in chewing for the past 1.5 months. The patient had a history of tobacco chewing. Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography of the neck revealed an ulcerative heterogeneously enhancing irregular soft tissue density mass lesion measuring 40.2×20.2×10.3 mm involving the left lateral border of the tongue (Table/Fig 3)a. The patient underwent wide excision glossectomy with modified neck dissection, and the specimen was sent for histopathology. Microscopic examination revealed a tumour composed of invasive nests and sheets of moderately pleomorphic atypical squamous epithelial cells showing individual cell keratinisation and focal keratin pearl formation. A diagnosis of invasive moderately differentiated Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) was made, and the tumour was staged as pT3N0. The patient received adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy and was discharged with stable vitals. He was kept on regular follow-up. In the 7th month postoperatively, the patient reported a tender erythematous swelling over the posterior chest wall. Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography of the thorax showed a heterogeneously enhancing soft tissue density mass lesion in the posterior chest wall (Table/Fig 3)b. Fine needle aspiration cytology revealed clusters of atypical cells comprising round to oval pleomorphic nuclei with fine granular chromatin, prominent nucleoli, and a moderate amount of cytoplasm, favoring poorly differentiated carcinoma (Table/Fig 3)c. An incisional biopsy was performed, which showed nests and sheets of atypical polygonal cells showing moderate nuclear pleomorphism, vesicular chromatin, prominent nucleoli, and eosinophilic cytoplasm with individual cell keratinisation (Table/Fig 3)d. A histopathological diagnosis suggestive of metastatic SCC was made. The patient was advised concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy, but due to financial constraints, he denied treatment and was lost to follow-up.

Case 4

A 38-year-old male patient presented to the outpatient department (OPD) with complaints of a mass over the left mandibular region for the past 1.5 months. The patient had a history of tobacco chewing for 10 years. Magnetic resonance imaging of the neck revealed a heterogeneously enhancing necrotic mass in the angle of the left mandible. Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography of the neck revealed a mass lesion involving the left mandible measuring 80.3×70.6×10.7 mm, with destruction of the underlying mandible and enlarged left cervical level 1b and II nodes (Table/Fig 4)a. Biopsy results showed a tumour composed of invasive nests and sheets of atypical polygonal cells showing mild to moderate nuclear pleomorphism, vesicular chromatin, prominent nucleoli, and a moderate amount of eosinophilic cytoplasm with single cell keratinisation and focal keratin pearl formation, consistent with the diagnosis of moderately differentiated Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC). Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography of the abdomen revealed multiple variably sized hypodense lesions in both lobes of the liver, with decreased enhancement relative to the background liver parenchyma, most conspicuous in the portal venous phase, suggesting metastases (Table/Fig 4)b. Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology from a liver nodule was performed, showing atypical polygonal cells present in clusters comprising pleomorphic round to oval nuclei with vesicular chromatin, prominent nucleoli, and a moderate amount of cytoplasm. The features were suggestive of metastatic poorly differentiated carcinoma favoring SCC (Table/Fig 4)c. A biopsy was performed, revealing nests and sheets of atypical polygonal cells showing mild nuclear pleomorphism, round to oval nuclei with vesicular chromatin, prominent nucleoli, and moderate to abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm with individual cell keratinisation and intercellular bridges, suggesting metastatic SCC (Table/Fig 4)d. The patient was then planned for chemotherapy, following which he was discharged with stable vitals and advised regular follow-up.

The findings of all four cases have been summarised below (Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

In the head and neck region, Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) is the most common type of malignancy worldwide. Patients who exhibit metastasis to regional lymph nodes during the initial diagnosis have a 30% risk of developing distant metastasis within 9 to 12 months (9). The tongue is the most common primary site for distant metastasis (10). In our study, two out of the four cases showed carcinoma in the left lateral border of the tongue. A review by Irani S indicated that the gingiva is the most frequent primary site of involvement for distant metastasis (10).

Metastases to the breast from extramammary tumours are very rare, comprising 0.5% to 6.6% of cases. The most common primary tumours metastasizing to the breast are contralateral breast carcinoma, followed by lung, gastrointestinal, gynaecological, haematological carcinomas, and melanoma (11). Breast metastases from SCCs of the head and neck region are extremely uncommon, and only a few cases have been reported in the literature (3). The mean age at diagnosis is usually 50 years, which is consistent with our case. The age range typically varies from 32-87 years (11). Metastases usually appear after 30 months of the primary extramammary malignancy diagnosis or during the course of treatment of the primary malignancy, as in our case (11). It is challenging to differentiate primary breast carcinoma from metastases because the clinical presentation might be similar to primary cancer, and it may be the initial presentation of a metastatic disease of unknown origin (12).

Radiology plays a critical role in diagnosing metastatic breast disease. On mammography, metastases present as single or multiple well-circumscribed masses, commonly located in the upper outer quadrant. Spiculations, calcifications, and desmoplastic reaction are absent, which are mainly seen in primary breast carcinomas (13). Histopathological and immunohistochemical examinations play an important role in accurately diagnosing the metastatic lesion and tailoring appropriate treatment (11). Surgery may be indicated only for symptom palliation or when an isolated breast metastasis is identified with a long interval from the diagnosis of the primary tumour (14). The prognosis is extremely poor, with an overall survival rate of less than a year from the time of diagnosis (14).

Metastases to the kidneys are very rare and are often erroneously diagnosed as primary tumours. The incidence of extrarenal tumours metastasizing to the kidneys varies from 2 to 20% (15). Distant metastasis of SCC of the tongue to the kidney is extremely uncommon, with only two reported cases in the literature (15). The median patient age is around 56.7 years, similar to our case, where the patient was a 56-year-old male. Imaging studies are the mainstay for diagnosing metastases (9). Radiologically, they are usually subcapsular in location, multicentric, small, and bilateral, with a known history of a primary tumour (15). Zhou C et al. reported a radiology pathology concordance of 51%, while Wu AJ et al. reported a concordance of 54% (16),(17).

In cases of secondary renal involvement, it is essential to rule out other possible differential diagnoses such as urothelial carcinoma with squamous differentiation and collecting duct carcinoma. Immunohistochemistry can be a useful tool, but it is not completely diagnostic due to overlapping features (9). SCCs usually show negativity for Cytokeratin 20 (CK20), whereas some urothelial carcinomas showing squamous differentiation are positive. Urothelial tumours are frequently CK7 positive, while SCCs are negative. Primary urothelial carcinoma typically exhibits strong diffuse expression of GATA3 (9). Paired-Box Gene 8 (PAX8) and CK7 can be helpful in distinguishing SCC from collecting duct carcinoma, with the latter being positive. A known history of a primary tumour can also be a helpful clue.

In a study by Wu AJ et al., the median time interval between primary diagnosis and metastases was reported to be three years, whereas Singh GK et al. and Elsarraj HS et al. reported a median interval of 18 months (17),(18),(9). In our study, the interval was 4 months, which was similar to the study by Thyavihally YB et al., who also reported a median time interval of four months (19). The median overall survival is about a year, and surgical interventions can help improve overall survival to more than two years (9).

The frequency of cutaneous metastasis from primary malignancies varies from 0.7% to 9%. In patients with head and neck SCC, the incidence of cutaneous metastasis is around 0.8-1.3% (20). The skin of the head and neck and chest region are the most common sites for metastasis (21). In our case, the site of metastasis was the posterior chest wall. One of the first reported cases of skin metastases was by Schultz and Schwartz in 1985, where a patient developed skin metastases secondary to carcinoma of the hypopharynx (22). Among all cancers of the head and neck region, laryngeal cancer is most often associated with skin metastasis (20).

FNAC and biopsy should be done to rule out the presence of malignancy even if the lesion appears clinically benign. Rastogi M et al. reported a case of SCC of the base of the tongue that showed multiple cutaneous metastases after 18 months of follow-up (20). Rahman T et al. reported cutaneous metastasis in a patient with carcinoma of the base of the tongue, in which lesions appeared one month after completion of treatment. This could possibly be due to the presence of occult skin metastasis during the course of treatment or at the time of diagnosis, which might have been missed (23). In our case, cutaneous metastasis occurred in the 7th month of follow-up. Treatment is usually palliative, and prognosis is very poor, with a survival of only a few months (20).

Metastases to the liver from head and neck cancers are rare, with an incidence of about 4.4% (24). Clinical history, imaging findings, FNAC, and biopsy can be used to accurately diagnose the metastatic lesion.

Metastatic nodules on ultrasonography are usually multiple and may be cystic, hypoechogenic, or hyperechogenic without a peripheral halo (24). Cases with isolated nodules in the liver and a history of head and neck cancer may show raised Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, which could be the only alarming sign (23). Marcy PY et al. reported distant metastases from head and neck carcinomas to the liver in 0.9% of the studied population, while Merino E et al. reported liver metastasis in 0.7% of cases (24),(25). Prognosis is usually very poor, with a median survival of only four months (24).

Conclusion

Distant metastasis from oral SCCs is a rare event and mostly occurs during advanced stages. Careful evaluation of patient during the treatment of primary malignancy can have a remarkable impact on the overall survival and prognosis. Clinicopathological correlation can be immensely helpful in making a correct diagnosis and tailoring an appropriate cost-effective treatment.

References

1.
Borse V, Konwar AN, Buragohain P. Oral cancer diagnosis and perspectives in India. Sensors International. 2020;1:100046. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-49. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Bugshan A, Farooq J. Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Metastasis, potentially associated malignant diaorders, etiology and recent advancements in diagnosis. F1000 Research. 2020;9:229-38. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
El-Naggar AK, Chan JKC, Grandis JR, Takata T, Slootweg PJ (Eds): WHO Classification of Head and Neck Tumours. 4th edition. IARC: Lyon; 2017.
5.
Kowalski LP, Carvalho AL, Priante AVM, Magrin J. Predictive factors for distant metastasis from oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2005;41(5):534-41. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Noguti J, De Moura CFG, De Jesus GPP, Da Silva VH, Hossaka TA, Oshima CT, et al. Metastasis from oral cancer: An overview. Cancer Genomics and Proteomics. 2012;9(5):329-35.
7.
Sharma A, Kim JW, Paeng JY. Clinical analysis of neck node metastasis in oral cavity cancer. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;44(6):282-88. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Ferlito A, Shara AR, Silver CE, Rinnaldo A, Mondin V. Incidence and sites of distant metastases from head and neck cancer. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2001;63(4):202-07.[crossref][PubMed]
9.
Elsarraj HS, Khawar S, Hamza A. Metastasis from tongue squamous cell carcinoma to kidney. Autopsy & Case Reports. 2021;11:257-61. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Irani S. Distant metastasis from oral cancer: A review and molecular biologic aspects. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016;6(4):65-71. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Longo R, Melgar E, Campitiello M, Plastino F, Eid N, Quirin I, et al. Breast metstasis from squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: A case report. J Med Case Rep. 2017;11(01):01-04. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Buisman FE, Van Gelder L, Menke-Pluijmers MBE. Non primary breast malignancies: A single institution’s experience of a diagnostic challenge with important therapeutic consequences-a retrospective study. World J Surg Oncol. 2008;19(4):682-87.
13.
Vaidya T, Ramani S, Rastogi A. A case series of metastases to breast from extramammary malignancies. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2018;28(4):470-75. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Leach B, Sun B, Petrovic L, Liu SV. Breast metastasis from nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A case report and review of literature. Oncol Lett. 2013;5(6):1859-61. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Sureka B, Bansal K, Agrawal N, Pand D, Arora A. Oral squamous cell carcinoma metastases to the kidneys: Is it common? J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(6): TJ01-TJ02. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Zhou C, Urbauer DL, Fellman BM. Metastases to the kidney: A comprehensive analysis of 151 patients from a tertiary referral centre. BJU Int. 2016;17(5):775-82. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Wu AJ, Mehra R, Hafez K, Wolf JS, Kunju LP. Metastases to the kidney: A clinicopathological study of 43 cases with an emphasis on deceptive features. Histopathology. 2015;66(4):587-97. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Singh GK, Singh P, Yadav V, Shanmuga PB, Periasamy K. Unusual sites of metastases in carcinoma tongue- A case report. OGH reports. 2017;6(2):77-79. [crossref]
19.
Thyavihally YB, Tongaonkar HB, D’Cruz AK, Chinoy RF. Carcinoma of tongue with solitary metastasis to kidney- case report. Indian J Urol. 2005;21(2):120-21. [crossref]
20.
Rastogi M, Srivastava K, Srivastava M, Chufal KS, Bhatt ML, Srivastava AN. Multiple skin metastases in forearm from base tongue carcinoma. Oral Oncology Extra. 2005;41(8):188-90. [crossref]
21.
Anehousur V, Desai SK, Acharya S, Kumar N. Distant chest skin metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of gingivobuccal sulcus: A rare case report. J Clin Diagn Res. 2020;14(2):XD01-XD03. [crossref]
22.
Verma K, Gupta M, Gulati A, Sharma RK. Cutaneous metastasis of carcinoma tongue: A rare case report. J Dermatol Dermatol Surg. 2019;23(2):99. [crossref]
23.
Rahman T, Krishnatreya M, Sarma A, Kumar M, Kataki AC. Cutaneous metastasis from squamous carcinoma of the base of tongue. N Am J Med Sci. 2015;7(1):24. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Marcy PY, Magne N, Bailet C, Pivot X, Dassonville O, Poissonnet G, et al. Liver metastases from head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: Radiological and Biological features. Oncol Res Treat. 2004;27(2):157-60. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Merino E, Hellin D, Rosique M, Amoros LM, Jimenez-Cervantes J. Laryngeal cancer and secondary neoplasms in Murcia. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 1994;45(2):93-97.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63502.18209

Date of Submission: Feb 15, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Apr 07, 2023
Date of Acceptance: May 26, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 07, 2023
• Manual Googling: Apr 19, 2023
• iThenticate Software: May 11, 2023 (21%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com