Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 38104

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : July | Volume : 17 | Issue : 7 | Page : EC30 - EC36 Full Version

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Paediatric Small Round Blue Cell Tumours at the Tertiary Care Centre, Ludhiana, India


Published: July 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/61460.18198
Shikha Narang, Arnav Kumar Roychoudhury, Gunjan Bala, Sumit Dhuria, Pavneet Kaur Selhi

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda, Punjab, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, PDCC Renal and Transplant Pathology, Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda, Punjab, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda, Punjab, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda, Punjab, India. 5. Professor, Department of Pathology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Sumit Dhuria,
Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda-151109, Punjab, India.
E-mail: sumitdhuria04@outlook.com; sumitdhuria1984@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Small, undifferentiated cells with high nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratios predominate in Small Round Blue Cell Tumours (SRBCT) and are characterised by their monotony. The classification of small round-cell tumours is further facilitated by Immunohistochemistry (IHC). Determine the line of differentiation using IHC, which also acts as a proxy for underlying molecular genetic changes. To identify the presence of a particular protein marker that can help with accurate cancer categorisation and diagnosis, histology uses IHC. In light of this, SRBCT are a subgroup of highly aggressive malignant neoplasms that are primarily comprised of monotonous, small, undifferentiated cells with high nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratios.

Aim: The study is aimed to analyse the role of IHC in the SRBCT to differentiate and accurately diagnose the tumour cells using molecular markers.

Materials and Methods: This ambispective cohort study was conducted from August 1st, 2010 to 31st July 2015, a total of five years in the Pathology Department of Dayanand Medical College and Hospital (DMCH), Ludhiana, Punjab, India. All specimens of SRBCT less than 18 years of age were analysed grossly and microscopically. The study covered patients who were in the paediatric age range. The SRBCT were distinguished and categorised using immunohistochemical staining. CD99, CD20, CD15, CD30, CD3, desmin, CD45/LCA (the Lymphocyte Common Antigen), chromogranin, Myogenin, Synaptophysin (SYP), Cytokeratin (CK), and Epithelial Membrane Antigen (EMA) were among the immunomarkers used in this investigation. The results were presented using percentage and frequency statistics.

Results: Total 54 cases of SRBCT were analysed. This included 12 cases of Non Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL), 10 cases of Ewing’s/Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumours (PNETs), 12 cases of Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (HL), nine cases of rhabdomyosarcoma, four cases of neuroblastoma, two cases each of Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH) and synovial sarcoma, and one case each of olfactory neuroblastoma, sarcoma and ganglioneuroblastoma.

Conclusion: The present study shows that utilising IHC in challenging circumstances is incredibly helpful and crucial where clinical-histomorphological findings are not sufficient for arriving at the final diagnosis. The majority of SRBCT developed in younger age groups, with lymphoma being the most prevalent type.

Keywords

Cluster of differentiation, Immunohistochemistry, Non-Hodgkins lymphoma, Protein markers

Small, monotonous, undifferentiated cells with high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratios and small, round, blue cell tumours are a subset of highly aggressive malignant neoplasms. A definitive diagnosis might be challenging because, even though traditional histological findings are typically highly predictive of tumour type, these tumours occasionally may be difficult to identify by Light Microscopy (LM) (1). The importance of making an accurate diagnosis of paediatric small-round-cell cancers has increased as various therapeutic modalities are employed for various tumour types. It has also become crucial to further categorise tumours using IHC, as a treatment for many paediatric tumours is personalised based on patient risk.

Neuroblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing’s sarcoma, acute lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma, and the blastematous component of Wilms’ tumour can be grouped as the SRBCT of childhood (2). While it is often relatively straightforward to arrive at a diagnosis on clinical and conventional pathological information, in a small proportion of cases this is not the case. Because it uses a specific antigen-antibody reaction to specifically visualise the distribution and amount of a specific molecule in the tissue, IHC is a crucial auxiliary technique for pathologists (3). The utilisation of IHC has recently exploded as more and more molecules involved in illness diagnosis, treatment, and causation are found. The fact that IHC is carried out without destroying the histologic architecture, sets it apart from many other laboratory studies. As a result, it is possible to evaluate a molecule’s expression pattern in a setting of the environment (4). Dhingra H et al., involved a 5-year retrospective review of all solid tumours in children under the age of 18 (5). The pattern of paediatric tumours was portrayed in this institution-based investigation. The neuropathological spectrum of dura-based non meningiothelial lesions identified over five years in the tertiary care centre was examined by Rao S et al., (6). Yadav M et al., final diagnoses made using an analysis of eosin-stained tissue sections and Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) haematoxylin (7). Barwad A et al., report histological analysis using immunofluorescence and electron microscopy frequently leads to an accurate diagnosis and encourages crucial treatment (8). To diagnose primary malignant mixed Mullerian tumours, Agrawal R et al., investigated the diagnostic utility of immunocytochemistry {Malignant Mixed Mullerian Tumour (MMMT)} and Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) (9). The pathologist should meticulously match the radiological, morphological, and clinical findings with a panel of IHC markers because no antibody is specific to a particular type of cancer (10). Consequently, to differentiate and accurately diagnose the tumour cells, IHC and molecular markers are studied in this article.

Many different kinds of soft tissue tumours lack distinguishing morphological characteristics and have a hazy differentiation line. In histology, IHC is employed for a particular protein marker which can facilitate precise tumour diagnosis and classification. As a consequence, SRBCT are a kind of extremely aggressive malignant neoplasms that are primarily characterised by small, monotonous, undifferentiated cells with high nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratios. This group includes Ewing’s/PNETs, neuroblastoma, NHL, rhabdomyosarcoma, monomorphic, LCH, synovial sarcoma, olfactory neuroblastoma, Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (ALCL), ganglioneuroblastoma, and desmoplastic SRBCT, small-cell carcinoma, mesenchymal chondrosarcoma, and small-cell osteosarcoma. Due to their near histological similarities, a variety of overlapping characteristics, and a lack of distinguishing characteristics on Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) sections, most of the SRBCT are extremely difficult to diagnose thereby necessitating IHC and molecular studies as additional support for proper diagnosis and accurate categorisation of these tumours. Treatment and the prognosis vary greatly among these tumours, thereby necessitating an accurate diagnosis, hence making the appropriate usage of IHC even more important in these smudgy greyish scenarios (11),(12),(13). The main goal is to examine the histological range of SRBCT during five years at a tertiary care facility, as well as the use of IHC in the identification of these cancers. Hence, the present study was conducted with aim to analyse the role of IHC markers for appropriate diagnosis to enable the clinician to give the most effective targeted and tailored treatment suited for that particular patient.

Material and Methods

This ambispective cohort study was conducted from 1st August 2010 to 31st July 2015 comprising of 1.5 years prospective from 1st August 2010 to 31st January 2012 and 3.5 years of retrospective analysis from 1st February 2012 to 31st July 2015, in the Pathology Department of Dayanand Medical College and Hospital (DMCH), Ludhiana, Punjab, India (Approved by the Institutional Research and Ethics Committee in the meeting held on 26.12.2013 vide letter no DMCH/TCM/2013 dated 28.12.2013). From August 2013 to August 2015, 54 patients participated in the present study at the DMCH tertiary care Hospital.

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: The study covered patients who were in the paediatric age range. The study did not include the small, spherical, blue-cell tumours of the bone marrow and all specimens of SRBCT less than 18 years of age were analysed. The study did not include the small, spherical, blue-cell tumours of the bone marrow.

Study Procedure

Utilising the appropriate panel of immunohistochemical antibodies and the streptavidin-biotin detection method, immunohistochemical studies were carried out to classify the tumours. From the institute’s pathology department’s records, all cases of round cell tumours reported from bone, soft tissue, and solid organ regions were gathered. All specimens of tumours less than 18 years of age were analysed grossly and microscopically. The files contained FFPE sections of cancers identified as SRBCT on resected tissues and small biopsies. Two impartial expert observers removed and examined the paraffin blocks.

The EnVision method was used to carry out the IHC. There was no need to dilute any of the antibodies. The samples were fixed in 10% neutral formaldehyde, routinely embedded in paraffin, and cut into 4 m slices, endogenous peroxidase activity was suppressed with 0.3% Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2) after being deparaffinised, microwaved for 10 minutes in citrate buffer (pH 6.0), and rehydrated in graduated series of ethanol. In an automated staining system (Agilent, America), the tissues are administered using standardised procedures. The study performed the initial blocks of IHCs stated as SRBCT following the departmental protocol using the following antibodies- Cluster of Differentiation (CD)99, Epithelial Membrane Antigen (EMA), CD45, Cytokeratin (CK), Friend Leukaemia Integration (FLI)-1, S-100, Chromogranin, Vimentin, Desmin, Synaptophysin (SYP) and Myogenin. To distinguish and classify SRBCT, further IHC stains were performed. The lymphocyte common antigen (CD45/LCA), CD30, CD99, CD20, CD15, and CD3 (called Monoclonal antibodies directed against the E2 protein (MIC2) or cluster of differentiation 99), Myogenin, desmin, CK, SYP, chromogranin, S100 were the immunomarkers used in this investigation. The statistical analysis of CD15 and CD30 has been included in the study as seen in (Table/Fig 1). The membranous/cytoplasmic/nuclear staining of various IHC markers was studied under Light Microscopy (LM).

Statistical Analysis

The results were presented using percentage and frequency statistics.

Results

The SRBCT were found in 54 cases, and the results of the study are shown in (Table/Fig 2). In the present study, there were 12 cases (22.2%) of NHL and 12 (22.2%) of HL cases, and the final diagnosis showed that 10 people have the ES/PNET tumour (18.5%). Moreover, the least cases were diagnosed as Neuroblastoma (7.4%), Synovial sarcoma and monophasic (3.7%), LCH (3.7%), Olfactory neuroblastoma (1.9%), Ganglioneuroblastoma (1.9%) and Sarcoma (1.9%).

(Table/Fig 3) shows the cases’ age distribution for both males and females. Patients with small rounded blue cell tumours ranged in age from one year to 18 years in the current study. The age range from 11≤15 years exhibited the highest percentage of tumour cases (18 cases, 33.3%). The least number of tumour cases occurred in the age group 6≤10 years (9 cases, 16.6%). In the present study, the tumour has mostly affected males with a high range of (40 cases, (74.1%)) when compared to females 14 (25.9%) cases. (Table/Fig 1) illustrates the demographic details of age and sex of 54 cases with the predicted nuclear features.

On Histochemical analysis, Neuroblastoma showed sheets of small round cells and perivascular rosettes (Table/Fig 4)(a). The cases presented areas with fibrillary material, differentiated areas often displayed a strong immunoreactivity, whereas undifferentiated areas with excessive cellularity were less positive (Table/Fig 4)(b). The ganglioneuroblastoma results revealed an abundant neuroblastic component that was dispersed widely or rosette-like and a clear ganglionic maturation with big, neurons with a high degree of differentiation (Table/Fig 4)(c). (Table/Fig 5)a-c showed IHC analysis of Monophasic Synovial Sarcoma while various presentations of rhabdomyosarcoma. (Table/Fig 6)a,b also depicted characterstic features.

Lymphoma was diagnosed in 24 cases out of 54 cases based on CD45 positivity. Further, the diagnosis of HL was based on CD15 and CD30 markers. In addition, NHL was further categorised into T cell and B cell types based on positive reactivity with CD20 and CD3, respectively. Myogenin positivity was seen in 100% of cases of Rhabdomyosarcoma. These cases showed heterogenous shapes of round to ovoid tumour cells with moderate eosinophilic cytoplasmic. The intercellular space showed a pale mucoid appearance (Table/Fig 6)(b). SYP and chromogranin positivity was noted to diagnose Neuroblastoma (Table/Fig 4). Both cases of LCH showed CD1a positivity Ewing’s Sarcoma showed characteristic reactivity with CD99 on cell membranes (Table/Fig 7)a,b. Anaplastic large cell lymphoma with CD30 membranous positivity, immunohistochemical picture shown in (Table/Fig 8). Compared with SYP, H&E was more sensitive, although less specific, in the identification of neuroblastoma.

Vimentin was found to be expressed in the cytoplasm of mangy tumour cells, according to the findings of the IHC staining study. According to this theory, patients with lymph node metastases (n=15) have considerably greater levels of vimentin protein expression than patients who do not contain metastases lymph nodes (n=24). IHC staining analysis revealed that vimentin overexpression was strongly linked to lymph node metastases in patients when taken as a whole (Table/Fig 5)b. SMA is a marker that can be used to identify smooth muscle, myofibroblastic, and associated cancers. However, because positive tumours can harbour a variety of other organisms, SMA positivity is insufficient in and of itself to diagnose smooth muscle differentiation (Table/Fig 5)c.

Morphologically, RMS cells are of heterogeneous shapes ranging from undifferentiated and round cells to ovoid cells, microscopically, this tumour was composed of round to oval cells with a moderate amount of cytoplasm. In this view, nuclei were moderately pleomorphic with coarse chromatin and inconspicuous nucleoli (Table/Fig 6).

Strong CD99 membranous staining was the primary indicator in the cluster analysis for ES, and it was seen in 67% of these tumours. Membranous CD99 staining, in contrast to H&E, X400, demonstrated weak specificity for ES, as demonstrated by high staining of synovial sarcomas in 17% (Table/Fig 7).

Strong diffuse positivity for CD30, as is shown in anaplastic large cell lymphoma (Table/Fig 8) and moderate localised staining for EMA were realised during immunohistochemical analyses. Oval-shaped nuclei, grooves, and invaginations on H&E, X400 are distinguishable features with positive CD1a immunostains. From this, the results define that CD1a is most consistent with the diagnosis of LCH (Table/Fig 9)a,b.

Discussion

Due to recent improvements in diagnostic and auxiliary techniques, SRBCT have proliferated exponentially and become increasingly complex. This type of neoplasm typically affects people of all ages and is distinguished by high cellularity, small cell diameters, sparse, and generally diffuse patterns of growth. These tumours exhibit malignant cells with basophilic staining nuclei and scanty cytoplasm; thereby giving it a bluish overall appearance on the slide; hence the more commonly known name “Small Round Blue Cell Tumour (SRBCT)” (11),(12),(13),(14). Historically, Ewing’s sarcoma/PNET, neuroblastoma, lymphomas, and rhabdomyosarcoma have been the primary SRBCT group members. Diagnosing these tumours had been a major challenge in the past but with the advent of ancillary techniques and with the combination of topographic, morphologic and ultrastructural features, navigating these diagnostic dilemmas has become easier over the last two-three decades (14).

Since SRBCT differ biologically and genetically and have a wide range of histomorphological variations, it is crucial to distinguish them from other types of tumours. The histopathological examination has been the gold diagnostic in diagnosing tumours but the employment of a panel of antibodies has made it possible for pinpointing the diagnosis in even smudgy cases where histopathology alone cannot be enough for prognostication of the tumour. Selective use of a panel of IHC markers has made the diagnosticating even better. Immunohistochemical findings interpretation is highly specific, sensitive and requires a high level of competence because it frequently has a considerable impact on the final diagnosis. IHC should therefore always be used in conjunction with histological diagnosis, to strengthen the final analysis and avoid any possible diagnostic pitfall. Therefore, an appropriately chosen panel of antibodies is of paramount importance for arriving at an accurate diagnosis and ruling out the overlapping morphological features.

In the present study, 54 cases of SRBCT in patients under the age of 18 were found and examined. This stated that men predominated (74% of patients were men and 26% were women), and the majority of cases had occurred in the 10-≤15 year age range. The studies’ sex distribution and male-to-female ratio were consistent with those of research by Ashraf MJ et.al, Bhagat VM et.al., D’cruz L et al., (11),(12),(13),(14). Additionally, there were 11 distinct types of small round cell tumours included in the study. The majority of these were NHL which contributed to 22.2% of all cases which was in concordance with the studies conducted by D’Cruz L et al., and Patel RG et al., (13),(14). Patel A et al., and Patel MM et al., the highest incidence of NHL was observed in malignant SRBCT (15),(16). They have been referred to as “Ewing’s sarcoma-like” despite lacking the pathognomonic classical EWSR1-ETS translocation of ES because of partial morphologic overlap with ES and weak/patchy, the only constant immunological profile is CD99 expression. The others included Ewing’s/PNET contributing to (18.5%) of total cases. Conrad P et al., showed 94.7% of cases (17); and the findings of the investigation were corroborated by Patel MM et al., who demonstrated that CD99 was positively correlated in all cases of Ewing’s sarcoma/PNET (16).

Immunohistochemically, strong membrane staining for CD99 is consistently seen in almost all cases of Ewing’s sarcoma/Primitive Neuro-Ectodermal Tumours (PNET), although it is not very specific as it may also come positive in several other soft tissue sarcomas and lymphoblastic lymphomas. Although it is not very specific because it can also be positive in several other soft tissue sarcomas and lymphoblastic lymphomas. When ES/PNET is investigated immunohistochemically, CD99 staining strong membrane is frequently observed. In this study, nine cases of Rhabdomyosarcoma contributed to (16.6%) of the total cases which were in concordance with the studies conducted by D’Cruze L et al., Patel RG et al., and Konrad P et al., (13),(14),(17). All of the studies showed 100% positivity for myogenin which corroborates with the present study findings.

The HL (22.2%), neuroblastoma (7.4%), monomorphic synovial sarcoma (3.7%), LCH (3.7%), olfactory neuroblastoma (1.9%), ganglioneuroblastoma (1.9%). In 2010, Martin AW, elucidated that NHL shows when CD45 is positive for CD3, it is highly selective for T cells and is negative for B cells, based on the eosin and haematoxylin stained sections from 12 biopsies from different organs, the initial differential diagnosis was Non-Hodgkins lymphoma (18). After IHC, 12 cases of NHL were further categorised as Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (five cases), Burkitt’s Lymphoma (two cases), ALCL (one case) and NHL unclassified (four cases). All 10 cases diagnosed to be ES/PNET showed positivity with CD99 which was in concordance with the findings of the study conducted by Folpe AL et al., (19). All four cases of neuroblastoma showed positivity with chromogranin (100%) and NSE which was similar to the studies done by Terada T whose carcinoids displayed SYP positivity (85%) and chromogranin positivity (62%) (20). In undifferentiated or poorly differentiated tumours, IHC may not be as helpful, but this study had no difficulty in diagnosing all 54 cases. (Table/Fig 10) depicts the immunochemistry study analysis from the last five years with the present study (21),(22),(23),(24).

Jarwani PB et al., study was conducted in tertiary care hospitals and cases diagnosed as STTs from January 2018 to December 2020 (25). Here, the Incidence of malignancy increased with age, malignant tumours being most common in the fifth decade. Adipocytic tumours (n=162, 63.8%) formed the major bulk of benign tumours. By examining the IHC expression of Ki-67 (MIB), neuron-specific enolase, SYP, and chromogranin in these tumours, Abdullah H et al., investigated the histological spectrum of NETs of the GIT (26). The molecular markers CD99, CD20, CD45/LCA, CD3, SYP, EMA, Myogenin, chromogranin, desmin, and CK are used in the current investigation. SRBCT are therefore a subset of extremely aggressive malignant neoplasms.

Limitation(s)

Firstly, the limited size of the patient population, secondly non availability of other modalities and markers for being an adjunct to the results were the limitations. Moreover, there were few undifferentiated/poorly differentiated tumours for which due to financial restraint and financial burden on the patient party, the authors could not apply the whole panel of IHC markers and could not arrive at a final diagnosis. Such cases had to be excluded from the study.

Conclusion

The SRBCT are a heterogeneous group of malignant neoplasms. IHC presents a rapid and cost-effective ancillary tool that can provide a clear-cut distinction among these various tumour types. A diverse category of malignant neoplasms is known as SRBCT. IHC is a fast and low-cost supplementary tool that can distinguish between these various cancer forms. Monoclonal antibodies CD45/LCA, CD20, CD3, CD99, Myogenin, desmin, EMA, CK, SYP, chromogranin, S100, CD34, ALK, MIC-2, CD1a BCL-2, BCL-6, and CD10 were applied on FFPE tissue sections. Its primary objective is to group patients according to their histomorphological patterns to guarantee that they receive an appropriate and targeted treatment that is well-tailored to their needs. It also aims to detect tumours that are more likely to result in catastrophic consequences and recurrence thereby ultimately improving the treatment outcome and final prognostication. IHC should be carried out to a high degree for the results to be beneficial and repeatable because it can provide such crucial information.

References

1.
Asadbeigi SN, Zhang L, Linos K. Subcutaneous desmoplastic small round-cell tumour: An unusual primary location expanding the differential of superficial round-cell tumours. Journal of Cutaneous Pathology. 2020;47(8):768-75. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Hingorani P, Dinu V, Zhang X, Lei H, Shern JF, Park J, et al. Transcriptome analysis of desmoplastic small round blue cell tumours identifies actionable therapeutic targets: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Oncology Group Scientific reports. 2020;10(1):01-12. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Zhuvithsii Z, Sarma A, Ahmed S, Kakoti L, Kalita M, Kataki AC. The role of histopathology and immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of pediatric round cell tumours: A five years study at a cancer care centre. National Journal of Medical Research. 2020;10(04):173-77.
4.
Shihab MA, Enaya HM. Immunohistochemical evaluation of CD3 T-cell lymphocyte and CD20 B-cell markers in Iraqi patients with celiac disease. EurAsian Journal of Bio Sciences. 2020;14(1):2023-28.
5.
Dhingra H, Narang S, Selhi P, Tyagi R, Sood N, Dhuria S. Unique tumors come in small packages: A single centre experience of histopathological spectrum of solid pediatric tumors in North West India. J Dr NTR Univ Health Sci [Internet]. 2022;11(2):118. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jdrntruhs.jdrntruhs_5_22. [crossref]
6.
Rao S, Chandran C, Konar S, Mahadevan A, Santosh V, Nandeesh BN. Pathological spectrum of Dura-based nonmeningothelial lesions: 5 years’ experience from a tertiary care centre. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base [Internet]. 2022;83(2):215-22. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Yadav M, Sharma P, Singh V, Tewari R, Mishra PS, Roy K. An audit of diagnostic disparity between intraoperative frozen section diagnosis and final histopathological diagnosis of central nervous system lesions at a tertiary care center. J Lab Physicians [Internet]. 2022;14(4):384-93. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1750064. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Barwad A, Bajaj V, Singh G, Dinda AK, Sahoo RK, Kumar L, et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance: Histomorphological spectrum at a tertiary care center. Glomerular Dis [Internet]. 2022;2(4):153-63. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Agarwal R, Singh M, Goswami S, Mandal S, Verma D, Khurana N, et al. USG guided fine needle aspiration cytology along with immunocytochemistry to diagnose primary malignant mixed Mullerian tumors: A three-year study from a tertiary care center. J Cytol [Internet]. 2022;39(1):09-13. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Yoshida KI, Machado I, Motoi T, Parafioriti A, Lacambra M, Ichikawa H, et al. NKX3-1 is a useful immunohistochemical marker of EWSR1-NFATC2 sarcoma and mesenchymal chondrosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol [Internet]. 2020;44(6):719-28. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Ashraf MJ, Beigomi L, Azarpira N, Geramizadeh B, Khademi B, Hakimzadeh A, et al. The small round blue cell tumours of the sinonasal area: Histological and immunohistochemical findings. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013;15(6):455-61. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Bhagat VM, Kaptan KR, Dudhat RB, Italiya SL, Tailor HJ, Patel AR. Adjunctive role of immunohistochemistry to traditional histomorphology in diagnosis and accurate typing of soft tissue sarcoma. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2013;2(4):980-87. [crossref]
13.
D’cruze L, Dutta R, Rao S, Rao A, Varadarajan S, Kuruvilla S. The role of immunohistochemistry in the analysis of the spectrum of small round blue cell tumours at a tertiary care centre. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7:1377-82. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Patel RG, Shah PY, Prajapati SG, Amin NS, Khant VS. Histopathological study of round cell tumours- A retrospective study. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2017;6(2):388-93. [crossref]
15.
Patel A, Patel M, Bhagat V, Naik K. Role of immunohistochemistry in the differential diagnosis of malignant small round blue cell tumour: A study of 38 cases. Int J Res Med Sci. 2015;3(12):3833-39. [crossref]
16.
Patel MM, Dhandha ZB, Italiya SL, Shah MB, Kaptan KR, Mansuri BM. Role of immunohistochemistry in the differential diagnosis of round cell tumour. Indian J Res. 2013;3(5):217-20.
17.
Konrad P, Cieckiewiczi AS, Pekuli M, Nowicki Z. Differential diagnosis of small round blue cell tumours (SRBCT), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry study. Pol J Pathol. 2009;4:151-62.
18.
Martin AW. Immunohistology of Non Hodgkins Lymphoma. In: David J. Dabbs, editor. Diagnostic immunohistochemistry, theranostic and genomic applications. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2010;157,162,166.
19.
Folpe AL, Goldblum JR, Rubin BP, Shehata BM, Liu W, Dei Tos AP, et al. Morphologic and immunophenotypic diversity in Ewing family tumours: A study of 66 genetically confirmed cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29(8):1025-33. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Terada T. Carcinoid tumours of digestive organs: A clinicopathologic study of 13 cases. Gastroenterology Research. 2009;2(1):35-37. [crossref]
21.
Rajan A, Prema NS. Morphologic spectrum of peripheral neuroblastic tumors-a 5-year retrospective study at a tertiary care centre in south india. Indian Journal of Pathology and Oncology. 2019;6(3):348-52. [crossref]
22.
Tripathy PK, Pattnaik K, Jena PK, Mohanty HK. Adrenal tumours in children: Spectrum of presentation and surgical approach in a tertiary care institute. Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology. 2020;41(03):351-57. [crossref]
23.
Murthy SS, Gundimeda SD, Challa S, Manjula V, Fonseca D, Rao VB, et al. FISH for EWSR1 in Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors: Experience from a tertiary care cancer center. Indian J Pathol Microbiol [Internet]. 2021;64(1):96-101. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/IJPM.IJPM_267_20.
24.
Bargunam P, Chandrashekhar T, Boya K. Histopathological spectrum of myxoid soft-tissue neoplasms in a tertiary care center with a special focus on vascular patterns: A 13-year compilation. Acta Med Int [Internet]. 2022;9(2):99. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/amit.amit_50_22. [crossref]
25.
Jarwani PB, Babaria SS, Joshi DS, Suri SK. Evaluation of soft tissue tumours with immunohistochemistry correlation. 2022.
26.
Abdullah H, Wani Z, Nabi Z, Shah P, Bhat S. Neuroendocrine tumours of the gastrointestinal tract with special reference to immunohistochemistry markers at a tertiary care hospital. APIK Journal of Internal Medicine. 2022;10(2):78-85.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/61460.18198

Date of Submission: Nov 14, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jan 02, 2023
Date of Acceptance: May 11, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 23, 2022
• Manual Googling: Mar 24, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Apr 20, 2023 (6%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 9

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com