Electrolyte Abnormalities in Patients Hospitalised with COVID-19 in the Southern Gaza Strip, Palestine: A Retrospective Case-control Study
Correspondence Address :
Dr. Abdelmarouf Hassan Mohieldein,
P.O. Box No. 6699, Buraidah-51452, Qassim, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
E-mail: mabdelmarouf@hotmail.com
Introduction: Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19), has caused, nearly 18 million deaths worldwide, many more hospitalisations, and severe economic and social disruption, as of March 2022. Malnutrition and electrolyte imbalance can lead to immune system dysfunction, which can increase the risk of infection.
Aim: To evaluate the electrolyte imbalance and other biomarkers in COVID-19 patients and also, to compare these parameters with healthy individuals.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted in the Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences at European Gaza Hospital, Southern Gaza Strip, Palestine. The duration of the study was four months, from February 2022 to May 2022. A total of 200 participants were included in the study, out of which 100 patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection by Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) test and 100 healthy individuals were recruited from blood bank donors and comprehensive Screening Department. Biochemical profile; Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG), urea, Creatinine (Cr), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), total Creatinine Kinase (CK-total), Creatine Kinase (CK) isoenzyme CK and electrolytes (Na, K, phosphorous, and Mg, ionised calcium, total calcium, and Cl) were assayed. Data were statistically analysed using Student’s t-test and Chi-square test.
Results: The mean age of the study participants was 54.1±12.2 years for cases and 54.3±12.4 years for controls. A total of 200 subjects, both the groups had 34 (34.0%) males and 66 (66.0%) females, which was not statistically significant (p-value >0.05). COVID-19 patients had significantly higher values of Na (141.9±4.6 vs 139.7±3.1; p<0.001), K (4.6±0.9 vs 4.3±0.5; p-value=0.001), Cl (108.7±5.3 vs 101.1±4.0; p<0.001), P (4.6±0.6 vs 4±1.4; p<0.001), and Mg (2.1±0.2 vs 1.7±0.3; p<0.001). However, they had lower Ca ionised (1.0±0.1 vs 1.1±0.1; p<0.001) and total Ca (8.4±0.9 vs 9.1±1.1; p<0.001). Furthermore, COVID-19 patients had significantly higher levels of biomarkers of other biochemical profiles compared to healthy controls.
Conclusion: As compared to healthy individuals, patients hospitalised with COVID-19, exhibited alterations in their electrolyte balance and other biochemical markers. Management of these parameters to get homeostasis warrant opportunities to reduce morbidity and mortality of disease.
Biomarkers, Coronavirus disease-2019, Manifestations, Multiorgan injury, Pandemic
The number of COVID-19 infection cases, grew exponentially throughout the world. Over 14.9 million confirmed cases and more than 610,000 deaths attributed to COVID-19 have been recorded globally as of July 2020 (1). The proportion of severe and critical COVID-19 cases increased nearly two fold in the Gaza Strip, Palestine (2). Additionally, the elderly and those with preexisting conditions such as, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and cancer are at a greater risk of contracting the COVID-19 (3). COVID-19 infect their hosts via Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors (4). Since, ACE2 receptors are expressed in the kidneys and Gastrointestinal (GI) tract, the virus can cause damage to these organs, which can lead to acute kidney injury and digestive problems (1). COVID-19 disease may also affect the respiratory, nervous, cardiovascular, and urogenital systems (5),(6),(7). Electrolytes plays a critical role in homeostasis, including fluid and acid-base balance regulation, oxygen delivery, and neurological function (8). Since, the GI tract and kidneys plays a crucial roles in fluid and electrolyte balance, patients with COVID-19 disease, may experience fluid and electrolyte imbalances, which, if untreated, may result in adverse events (9). In addition, electrolyte disorders (hyponatraemia, hypernatraemia, hypokalaemia, hyperkalaemia, and hypomagnesaemia) are prevalent among older subjects (55 years or older) in general population (10).
The prognosis of COVID-19 disease appears to be affected by various electrolyte imbalances, according to the findings of several investigations (11),(12). This is the first research to evaluate COVID-19 related electrolyte abnormalities in hospitalised patients, in the southern Gaza Strip. Possible advantages and applicability of such a study will enhance the patient outcomes, guiding clinical decision making and public health policy, and adding to the existing body of information on COVID-19. Hence, the present study was conducted to compare the electrolyte imbalance and biomarkers among patients hospitalised with COVID-19 and healthy subjects in the southern Gaza Strip of Palestine.
This retrospective case-control study was conducted in the Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences at European Gaza Hospital, a Government Hospital directed and owned by the Palestinian Ministry of Health (MOH), southern Gaza Strip. The duration of the study was four months, from February 2022 to May 2022. The Medical Laboratory Department at Al-Aqsa University in Gaza, approved the study. In addition, permission was obtained from the MOH’s General Directorate of Human Resources Development (GDHRD) to conduct the present study (approval no. 931180). The confidentiality of participants was maintained as all of the data were used anonymously.
Inclusion criteria: All patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 infection with or without electrolyte imbalance were included in the study. The control group consisted of age and gender matched healthy individuals. To ensure that, no one in the control group ever had a COVID-19 infection, they were chosen from newly employed and healthy donors recruited prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Exclusion criteria: Missing data files, patients who were not enrolled in COVID-19 department, patients with kidney disease, those with additional underlying illnesses, or those, who had received certain drugs, that might have an impact on their biochemical or electrolyte levels were excluded from the study.
Sample size calculation: The Epi Info programme calculator was used to calculate sample size. The total population with complete data on the study’s parameters was 5000 patients, with expected frequency 50% and margin error 6.8% at 95% Confidence Interval (CI), the total sample size calculated was 200 (100 cases and 100 controls).
The European Gaza Hospital diagnoses COVID-19, using World Health Organisation (WHO) and Palestinian Ministry of Health guidelines. The WHO recommends diagnosing COVID-19 with RT-PCR. Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs are tested for virus genetic material (13),(14).
Study Procedure
The European Gaza Hospital diagnoses COVID-19, using World Health Organisation (WHO) and Palestinian Ministry of Health guidelines. The WHO recommends diagnosing COVID-19 with RT-PCR. Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs are tested for virus genetic material (13),(14). The data concerning results of electrolytes and biochemical profile were extracted from the electronic archive system of European Gaza Hospital for patients with COVID-19 disease from February 2022 to May 2022, while the controls’ data were extracted from November 2017 to February 2018, from the system of blood bank donors and comprehensive screening department for new employees before the COVID-19 epidemic. Using a Mindray BS-480 clinical chemistry analyser, commercial kits were used to measure FBG, urea, Cr, AST, ALT, CK-total, isoenzyme Creatine Kinase-Myocardial Band (CK-MB), Phosphorous (P), and Magnesium (Mg). In addition, Ion-selective Electrode (ISE) analysers Erba Lyte 90 were used to assay the serum electrolytes sodium (Na), potassium (K), ionised calcium (Ca ionised), total calcium (total Ca), and chloride (Cl). The cut-off range for all the parameters, investigated in the present study, along with their respective references shown in (Table/Fig 1).
Statistical Analysis
The data was analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0. Results were summarised using mean and Standard Deviation (SD) or number (percentage), and comparison between patients and controls, between genders were done by Student’s t-test and Chi-square test. Pearson’s correlation test was used to investigate the relationship between age and selected parameters. A (p-value <0.05) was considered statistically significant.
The present study included 200 subjects (100 COVID-19 patients as cases and 100 healthy individuals, as controls). Regarding gender, both groups’ cases and controls had equal numbers of males 34 (34.0%) and females 66 (66.0%) and there was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). Patients with COVID-19 showed significantly higher levels of Na (p<0.001)), K (p=0.001), Cl (p<0.001), P (p<0.001), Mg (p<0.001) than healthy controls. In contrast levels of Ca ionised (p<0.001) and total Ca (p<0.001) were significantly lower in patients with COVID-19, as compared to controls. Moreover, patients with COVID-19 characterised by significantly higher levels of biomarkers of other biochemical profiles compared to healthy controls; FBG (p<0.001), Urea (p<0.001), Cr (p<0.001), AST (p<0.001), ALT (p=0.001), CK-total (p<0.001), CK-MB (p<0.001) (Table/Fig 2).
In the cases, data analysis revealed that, males had significantly higher levels of CK-MB than females (41.6±26.6 vs 30.9±24.8, p=0.048). However, there was no statistically significant difference found in the levels of other studied parameters between males and females (p>0.05) (Table/Fig 3). In present study, there was no significant correlation between age and electrolytes and other biochemical parameters among patients hospitalised with COVID-19, indicating that, age is not a major contributing factor to changes in these parameters. However, Na in cases was positively correlated with K, CK total and isoenzyme (p<0.05). In addition, the correlation test revealed that, there was a positive and significant association between the ionised and total Ca levels and the Cl. Lastly, the Cl in cases correlated positively with Ca total and Ca ionised (p<0.05) (Table/Fig 4).
Coronaviruses have spread throughout the world, resulting in nearly 18 million deaths, many more hospitalisations and significant economic and social disruption as of March 2022 (15). Monitoring clinical, haematological, and biochemical parameters is essential for COVID-19 patient management. Severity and outcome categorisation based on biochemical parameters is important (16). A total of 100 patients with COVID-19 were recruited for this age- and gender-matched case-control study, representing the cases, and 100 healthy individuals served as the controls.
Reports of electrolyte abnormalities in COVID-19 patients are heterogeneous and controversial. Data from the present study revealed that, Na, K, Cl, P, and Mg levels in the blood were significantly higher in COVID-19 patients than in healthy controls. However, Ca ionised and total Ca significantly decreased in cases compared to controls. In previous studies, hypernatraemia and hyperkalaemia were found to be significantly more common in COVID-19 patients than in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) negative patients (17),(18),(19), which is in line with the findings of the current research.
Many studies reported significantly higher serum concentrations of Mg (hypermagnesaemia) and P (hyperphosphataemia) in patient diagnosed with COVID-19 and its association with the severity of the disease (18),(19),(20). While Low levels of total and ionised Ca in 7blood of COVID-19 patients were reported (21),(22),(23). Hypocalcaemia was significantly associated with severity of the disease, mortality in patients with COVID-19, number of hospitalisation days and admission to the intensive care unit (24),(25),(26). In contrast to these findings, a number of published studies have documented that, patients diagnosed with COVID-19 infection and while they were hospitalised, exhibited symptoms of hyponatraemia, hypochloraemia and hypokalaemia (27),(28),(29),(30). Sarvazad H et al., reported from a cross-sectional study that, 38% hyponatraemia, 7.3% hypokalaemia and 32% hypomagnesaemia were found in patients with COVID-19 (31). Moreover, hypophosphataemia was reported in 33 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 with an incidence of 7.6% (32). (Table/Fig 5) demonstrates discrepancy in reporting findings of electrolytes in patients diagnosed with COVID-19. The present study’s data analysis revealed that, patients diagnosed with COVID-19 had significantly higher FBG levels than healthy controls. In line with the findings of the present study, the mean value of FBG has been found to be higher in patients with COVID-19, and there has been an association between the severity of COVID-19 and blood glucose level (31). Rao S et al., found that, COVID-19 infected hospitalised patients who died, had higher admission glucose levels than those who lived (33).
In the present study, COVID-19 patients had significantly higher levels of urea and creatinine, when compared to healthy controls.
MagnesiumIn agreement with the findings from present study, a retrospective, single-centre study found that, the serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen levels of COVID-19 patients increased substantially during the disease’s peak compared to the recovery period (34). In addition, liver enzymes AST and ALT in COVID-19 patients were significantly higher than in the healthy controls. Medetalibeyoglu A et al., reported high mean values of liver enzymes AST and ALT for COVID-19 patients on admission (35). Moreover, Wu Y et al., found that, elevated liver enzymes AST and ALT in COVID-19 patients may have multiple causes, including direct liver injury, associated inflammatory responses, congestive hepatopathy, haepatic ischaemia, and drug-induced liver injury [36,37]. Lastly, the results from the preset study revealed that, COVID-19 patients had statistically significantly higher mean values of CK-total and CK-MB than controls. Yang J et al., evaluated cardiac function in patients with COVID-19 infections and found that, among hospitalised COVID-19 patients, the prevalence of myocardial injury is high and is associated with a significant elevation of related cardiac biomarkers (38). In addition, abnormalities in myocardial enzymes, including cardiac troponin I, creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, and CK-MB have been reported to be associated with the severity and fatal outcomes of COVID-19 (39).
Liu J et al., studied the association of sex with clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients and they discovered males of all ages had greater levels of organ function parameters (such as ALT, AST, and CK-MB) than did age-matched females, according to age group stratification (40). Pearson’s correlation analysis revealed no significant relationship between the ages in the COVID-19 patients. Tezcan ME et al., found that, there was no statistically significant relationship between the age of the cases and the examined variables (41). Findings of the present study could conclude that, the age was not a confounding factor and had no contribution in alteration of the investigated parameters during the study. This could suggest that, the severity of the illness and the presence of co-morbidities are more significant factors in determining the development of electrolyte abnormalities than previously thought.
However, Pearson’s correlation analyses showed positive correlations between Na and ionised Ca in one hand and K and cardiac biomarkers, CK total and CK-MB in other hand. These results agreed with Sjöström A et al., who found that, there is a relation between the electrolyte and biochemical parameters among COVID-19 cases (42). However, there was no significant association between the K and the other studied chemistry parameters. In contrast to present study’s findings, hypokalaemia was associated with hypocalcaemia in subjects with COVID-19, which was detected in 50% of subjects (30).
Limitation(s)
The researchers of the present study, did not have access to the patients’ complete medical history, which could have an impact on the interpretation of laboratory results. Also, focusing on a specific set of laboratory tests or abnormalities could limit the overall understanding of the effect that COVID-19 has on electrolyte abnormalities and other aspects of the biochemical profile.
In conclusion, the results of the present study showed that, patients with COVID-19 had significantly higher Na, K, Cl, P, and Mg values. In addition, COVID-19 patients had higher levels of biomarkers of other biochemical profile including glucose, kidney function, liver enzymes AST and ALT, and cardiac enzymes than normal individuals. The author’s findings suggested that, hospitalise COVID-19 patients manifest significant alteration in electrolytes and other biochemical profile. Management of these parameters to get homeostasis, could that warrant opportunities to reduce morbidity and mortality of disease. In future research, the long term impacts of COVID-19 on electrolyte abnormalities and other aspects of survivors’ biochemical profiles could be investigated. Also, it might be possible to investigate how the various COVID-19 variants may influence electrolyte abnormalities and other aspects of a person’s biochemical composition.
The authors would like to extend their gratitude to the members of the JCDR editorial for the assistance they provided in restructuring the results.
DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63100.18157
Date of Submission: Jan 25, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Feb 23, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Apr 24, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2023
AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA
PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 08, 2023
• Manual Googling: Mar 22, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Apr 12, 2023 (8%)
ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin
EMENDATIONS: 7
- Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
- Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
- Academic Search Complete Database
- Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
- Embase
- EBSCOhost
- Google Scholar
- HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
- Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
- Journal seek Database
- Popline (reproductive health literature)
- www.omnimedicalsearch.com