Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 142536

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : July | Volume : 17 | Issue : 7 | Page : BC05 - BC09 Full Version

Electrolyte Abnormalities in Patients Hospitalised with COVID-19 in the Southern Gaza Strip, Palestine: A Retrospective Case-control Study


Published: July 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/63100.18157
Mahmoud I Elhabiby, Ayman Abu Mustafa, Abdelmarouf Hassan Mohieldein

1. Associate Professor, Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Al-Aqsa University, Gaza. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Continuing Academic Education, Palestine College of Nursing, Ministry of Health, Gaza. 3. Professor, Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Buraidah, Qassim, Saudi Arabia.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Abdelmarouf Hassan Mohieldein,
P.O. Box No. 6699, Buraidah-51452, Qassim, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
E-mail: mabdelmarouf@hotmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19), has caused, nearly 18 million deaths worldwide, many more hospitalisations, and severe economic and social disruption, as of March 2022. Malnutrition and electrolyte imbalance can lead to immune system dysfunction, which can increase the risk of infection.

Aim: To evaluate the electrolyte imbalance and other biomarkers in COVID-19 patients and also, to compare these parameters with healthy individuals.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted in the Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences at European Gaza Hospital, Southern Gaza Strip, Palestine. The duration of the study was four months, from February 2022 to May 2022. A total of 200 participants were included in the study, out of which 100 patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection by Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) test and 100 healthy individuals were recruited from blood bank donors and comprehensive Screening Department. Biochemical profile; Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG), urea, Creatinine (Cr), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), total Creatinine Kinase (CK-total), Creatine Kinase (CK) isoenzyme CK and electrolytes (Na, K, phosphorous, and Mg, ionised calcium, total calcium, and Cl) were assayed. Data were statistically analysed using Student’s t-test and Chi-square test.

Results: The mean age of the study participants was 54.1±12.2 years for cases and 54.3±12.4 years for controls. A total of 200 subjects, both the groups had 34 (34.0%) males and 66 (66.0%) females, which was not statistically significant (p-value >0.05). COVID-19 patients had significantly higher values of Na (141.9±4.6 vs 139.7±3.1; p<0.001), K (4.6±0.9 vs 4.3±0.5; p-value=0.001), Cl (108.7±5.3 vs 101.1±4.0; p<0.001), P (4.6±0.6 vs 4±1.4; p<0.001), and Mg (2.1±0.2 vs 1.7±0.3; p<0.001). However, they had lower Ca ionised (1.0±0.1 vs 1.1±0.1; p<0.001) and total Ca (8.4±0.9 vs 9.1±1.1; p<0.001). Furthermore, COVID-19 patients had significantly higher levels of biomarkers of other biochemical profiles compared to healthy controls.

Conclusion: As compared to healthy individuals, patients hospitalised with COVID-19, exhibited alterations in their electrolyte balance and other biochemical markers. Management of these parameters to get homeostasis warrant opportunities to reduce morbidity and mortality of disease.

Keywords

Biomarkers, Coronavirus disease-2019, Manifestations, Multiorgan injury, Pandemic

The number of COVID-19 infection cases, grew exponentially throughout the world. Over 14.9 million confirmed cases and more than 610,000 deaths attributed to COVID-19 have been recorded globally as of July 2020 (1). The proportion of severe and critical COVID-19 cases increased nearly two fold in the Gaza Strip, Palestine (2). Additionally, the elderly and those with preexisting conditions such as, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and cancer are at a greater risk of contracting the COVID-19 (3). COVID-19 infect their hosts via Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors (4). Since, ACE2 receptors are expressed in the kidneys and Gastrointestinal (GI) tract, the virus can cause damage to these organs, which can lead to acute kidney injury and digestive problems (1). COVID-19 disease may also affect the respiratory, nervous, cardiovascular, and urogenital systems (5),(6),(7). Electrolytes plays a critical role in homeostasis, including fluid and acid-base balance regulation, oxygen delivery, and neurological function (8). Since, the GI tract and kidneys plays a crucial roles in fluid and electrolyte balance, patients with COVID-19 disease, may experience fluid and electrolyte imbalances, which, if untreated, may result in adverse events (9). In addition, electrolyte disorders (hyponatraemia, hypernatraemia, hypokalaemia, hyperkalaemia, and hypomagnesaemia) are prevalent among older subjects (55 years or older) in general population (10).

The prognosis of COVID-19 disease appears to be affected by various electrolyte imbalances, according to the findings of several investigations (11),(12). This is the first research to evaluate COVID-19 related electrolyte abnormalities in hospitalised patients, in the southern Gaza Strip. Possible advantages and applicability of such a study will enhance the patient outcomes, guiding clinical decision making and public health policy, and adding to the existing body of information on COVID-19. Hence, the present study was conducted to compare the electrolyte imbalance and biomarkers among patients hospitalised with COVID-19 and healthy subjects in the southern Gaza Strip of Palestine.

Material and Methods

This retrospective case-control study was conducted in the Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences at European Gaza Hospital, a Government Hospital directed and owned by the Palestinian Ministry of Health (MOH), southern Gaza Strip. The duration of the study was four months, from February 2022 to May 2022. The Medical Laboratory Department at Al-Aqsa University in Gaza, approved the study. In addition, permission was obtained from the MOH’s General Directorate of Human Resources Development (GDHRD) to conduct the present study (approval no. 931180). The confidentiality of participants was maintained as all of the data were used anonymously.

Inclusion criteria: All patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 infection with or without electrolyte imbalance were included in the study. The control group consisted of age and gender matched healthy individuals. To ensure that, no one in the control group ever had a COVID-19 infection, they were chosen from newly employed and healthy donors recruited prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Exclusion criteria: Missing data files, patients who were not enrolled in COVID-19 department, patients with kidney disease, those with additional underlying illnesses, or those, who had received certain drugs, that might have an impact on their biochemical or electrolyte levels were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: The Epi Info programme calculator was used to calculate sample size. The total population with complete data on the study’s parameters was 5000 patients, with expected frequency 50% and margin error 6.8% at 95% Confidence Interval (CI), the total sample size calculated was 200 (100 cases and 100 controls).

The European Gaza Hospital diagnoses COVID-19, using World Health Organisation (WHO) and Palestinian Ministry of Health guidelines. The WHO recommends diagnosing COVID-19 with RT-PCR. Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs are tested for virus genetic material (13),(14).

Study Procedure

The European Gaza Hospital diagnoses COVID-19, using World Health Organisation (WHO) and Palestinian Ministry of Health guidelines. The WHO recommends diagnosing COVID-19 with RT-PCR. Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs are tested for virus genetic material (13),(14). The data concerning results of electrolytes and biochemical profile were extracted from the electronic archive system of European Gaza Hospital for patients with COVID-19 disease from February 2022 to May 2022, while the controls’ data were extracted from November 2017 to February 2018, from the system of blood bank donors and comprehensive screening department for new employees before the COVID-19 epidemic. Using a Mindray BS-480 clinical chemistry analyser, commercial kits were used to measure FBG, urea, Cr, AST, ALT, CK-total, isoenzyme Creatine Kinase-Myocardial Band (CK-MB), Phosphorous (P), and Magnesium (Mg). In addition, Ion-selective Electrode (ISE) analysers Erba Lyte 90 were used to assay the serum electrolytes sodium (Na), potassium (K), ionised calcium (Ca ionised), total calcium (total Ca), and chloride (Cl). The cut-off range for all the parameters, investigated in the present study, along with their respective references shown in (Table/Fig 1).

Statistical Analysis

The data was analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0. Results were summarised using mean and Standard Deviation (SD) or number (percentage), and comparison between patients and controls, between genders were done by Student’s t-test and Chi-square test. Pearson’s correlation test was used to investigate the relationship between age and selected parameters. A (p-value <0.05) was considered statistically significant.

Results

The present study included 200 subjects (100 COVID-19 patients as cases and 100 healthy individuals, as controls). Regarding gender, both groups’ cases and controls had equal numbers of males 34 (34.0%) and females 66 (66.0%) and there was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). Patients with COVID-19 showed significantly higher levels of Na (p<0.001)), K (p=0.001), Cl (p<0.001), P (p<0.001), Mg (p<0.001) than healthy controls. In contrast levels of Ca ionised (p<0.001) and total Ca (p<0.001) were significantly lower in patients with COVID-19, as compared to controls. Moreover, patients with COVID-19 characterised by significantly higher levels of biomarkers of other biochemical profiles compared to healthy controls; FBG (p<0.001), Urea (p<0.001), Cr (p<0.001), AST (p<0.001), ALT (p=0.001), CK-total (p<0.001), CK-MB (p<0.001) (Table/Fig 2).

In the cases, data analysis revealed that, males had significantly higher levels of CK-MB than females (41.6±26.6 vs 30.9±24.8, p=0.048). However, there was no statistically significant difference found in the levels of other studied parameters between males and females (p>0.05) (Table/Fig 3). In present study, there was no significant correlation between age and electrolytes and other biochemical parameters among patients hospitalised with COVID-19, indicating that, age is not a major contributing factor to changes in these parameters. However, Na in cases was positively correlated with K, CK total and isoenzyme (p<0.05). In addition, the correlation test revealed that, there was a positive and significant association between the ionised and total Ca levels and the Cl. Lastly, the Cl in cases correlated positively with Ca total and Ca ionised (p<0.05) (Table/Fig 4).

Discussion

Coronaviruses have spread throughout the world, resulting in nearly 18 million deaths, many more hospitalisations and significant economic and social disruption as of March 2022 (15). Monitoring clinical, haematological, and biochemical parameters is essential for COVID-19 patient management. Severity and outcome categorisation based on biochemical parameters is important (16). A total of 100 patients with COVID-19 were recruited for this age- and gender-matched case-control study, representing the cases, and 100 healthy individuals served as the controls.

Reports of electrolyte abnormalities in COVID-19 patients are heterogeneous and controversial. Data from the present study revealed that, Na, K, Cl, P, and Mg levels in the blood were significantly higher in COVID-19 patients than in healthy controls. However, Ca ionised and total Ca significantly decreased in cases compared to controls. In previous studies, hypernatraemia and hyperkalaemia were found to be significantly more common in COVID-19 patients than in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) negative patients (17),(18),(19), which is in line with the findings of the current research.

Many studies reported significantly higher serum concentrations of Mg (hypermagnesaemia) and P (hyperphosphataemia) in patient diagnosed with COVID-19 and its association with the severity of the disease (18),(19),(20). While Low levels of total and ionised Ca in 7blood of COVID-19 patients were reported (21),(22),(23). Hypocalcaemia was significantly associated with severity of the disease, mortality in patients with COVID-19, number of hospitalisation days and admission to the intensive care unit (24),(25),(26). In contrast to these findings, a number of published studies have documented that, patients diagnosed with COVID-19 infection and while they were hospitalised, exhibited symptoms of hyponatraemia, hypochloraemia and hypokalaemia (27),(28),(29),(30). Sarvazad H et al., reported from a cross-sectional study that, 38% hyponatraemia, 7.3% hypokalaemia and 32% hypomagnesaemia were found in patients with COVID-19 (31). Moreover, hypophosphataemia was reported in 33 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 with an incidence of 7.6% (32). (Table/Fig 5) demonstrates discrepancy in reporting findings of electrolytes in patients diagnosed with COVID-19. The present study’s data analysis revealed that, patients diagnosed with COVID-19 had significantly higher FBG levels than healthy controls. In line with the findings of the present study, the mean value of FBG has been found to be higher in patients with COVID-19, and there has been an association between the severity of COVID-19 and blood glucose level (31). Rao S et al., found that, COVID-19 infected hospitalised patients who died, had higher admission glucose levels than those who lived (33).

In the present study, COVID-19 patients had significantly higher levels of urea and creatinine, when compared to healthy controls.

MagnesiumIn agreement with the findings from present study, a retrospective, single-centre study found that, the serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen levels of COVID-19 patients increased substantially during the disease’s peak compared to the recovery period (34). In addition, liver enzymes AST and ALT in COVID-19 patients were significantly higher than in the healthy controls. Medetalibeyoglu A et al., reported high mean values of liver enzymes AST and ALT for COVID-19 patients on admission (35). Moreover, Wu Y et al., found that, elevated liver enzymes AST and ALT in COVID-19 patients may have multiple causes, including direct liver injury, associated inflammatory responses, congestive hepatopathy, haepatic ischaemia, and drug-induced liver injury [36,37]. Lastly, the results from the preset study revealed that, COVID-19 patients had statistically significantly higher mean values of CK-total and CK-MB than controls. Yang J et al., evaluated cardiac function in patients with COVID-19 infections and found that, among hospitalised COVID-19 patients, the prevalence of myocardial injury is high and is associated with a significant elevation of related cardiac biomarkers (38). In addition, abnormalities in myocardial enzymes, including cardiac troponin I, creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, and CK-MB have been reported to be associated with the severity and fatal outcomes of COVID-19 (39).

Liu J et al., studied the association of sex with clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients and they discovered males of all ages had greater levels of organ function parameters (such as ALT, AST, and CK-MB) than did age-matched females, according to age group stratification (40). Pearson’s correlation analysis revealed no significant relationship between the ages in the COVID-19 patients. Tezcan ME et al., found that, there was no statistically significant relationship between the age of the cases and the examined variables (41). Findings of the present study could conclude that, the age was not a confounding factor and had no contribution in alteration of the investigated parameters during the study. This could suggest that, the severity of the illness and the presence of co-morbidities are more significant factors in determining the development of electrolyte abnormalities than previously thought.

However, Pearson’s correlation analyses showed positive correlations between Na and ionised Ca in one hand and K and cardiac biomarkers, CK total and CK-MB in other hand. These results agreed with Sjöström A et al., who found that, there is a relation between the electrolyte and biochemical parameters among COVID-19 cases (42). However, there was no significant association between the K and the other studied chemistry parameters. In contrast to present study’s findings, hypokalaemia was associated with hypocalcaemia in subjects with COVID-19, which was detected in 50% of subjects (30).

Limitation(s)

The researchers of the present study, did not have access to the patients’ complete medical history, which could have an impact on the interpretation of laboratory results. Also, focusing on a specific set of laboratory tests or abnormalities could limit the overall understanding of the effect that COVID-19 has on electrolyte abnormalities and other aspects of the biochemical profile.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the results of the present study showed that, patients with COVID-19 had significantly higher Na, K, Cl, P, and Mg values. In addition, COVID-19 patients had higher levels of biomarkers of other biochemical profile including glucose, kidney function, liver enzymes AST and ALT, and cardiac enzymes than normal individuals. The author’s findings suggested that, hospitalise COVID-19 patients manifest significant alteration in electrolytes and other biochemical profile. Management of these parameters to get homeostasis, could that warrant opportunities to reduce morbidity and mortality of disease. In future research, the long term impacts of COVID-19 on electrolyte abnormalities and other aspects of survivors’ biochemical profiles could be investigated. Also, it might be possible to investigate how the various COVID-19 variants may influence electrolyte abnormalities and other aspects of a person’s biochemical composition.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to extend their gratitude to the members of the JCDR editorial for the assistance they provided in restructuring the results.

References

1.
Kordzadeh-Kermani E, Khalili H, Karimzadeh I. Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations and complications of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Future Microbiol. 2020;15:1287-305. Doi: 10.2217/fmb-2020-0110.[crossref][PubMed]
2.
Ministry of Health (MOH-PHIC) daily reports on COVID-19 in gaza strip. COVID- 19 cases in the Gaza strip. Monthly epidemiological bulletin from (16/10 TO 15/11 2021) AND from (16/11 TO 15/12 2021).
3.
Boukhris M, Hillani A, Moroni F, Annabi MS, Addad F, Ribeiro MH, et al. Cardiovascular implications of the COVID-19 pandemic: A global perspective. Can J Cardiol. 2020;36(7):1068-80. Doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.05.018. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Magrone T, Magrone M, Jirillo E. Focus on receptors for coronaviruses with special reference to angiotensin- converting enzyme 2 as a potential drug target-a perspective. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2020;20(6):807-11. Doi: 10.2174/1871530320666200427112902. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Xu J, Xiao W, Liang X, Shi L, Zhang P, Wang Y, et al. A meta-analysis on the risk factors adjusted association between cardiovascular disease and COVID-19 severity. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1533. Doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11051-w. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Hashim M, Athar S, Gaba WH. New onset adrenal insufficiency in a patient with COVID-19. BMJ Case Rep. 2021;14(1):e237690. Doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-237690. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Zheng KI, Feng G, Liu WY, Targher G, Byrne CD, Zheng MH. Extrapulmonary complications of COVID-19: A multisystem disease? J Med Virol. 2021;93(1):323- 35. Doi: 10.1002/jmv.26294. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Balc AK, Koksal O, Kose A, Armagan E, Ozdemir F, Inal T, et al. General characteristics of patients with electrolyte imbalance admitted to emergency department. World J Emerg Med. 2013;4(2):113-16. Doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.issn.1920-8642.2013.02.005. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Pourfridoni M, Abbasnia SM, Shafaei F, Razaviyan J, Heidari-Soureshjani R. Fluid and electrolyte disturbances in COVID-19 and their complications. Bio Med Research International. 2021;2021:6667047. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Liamis G, Rodenburg EM, Hofman A, Zietse R, Stricker BH, Hoorn EJ. Electrolyte disorders in community subjects: Prevalence and risk factors. Am J Med. 2013;126(3):256-63. Doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.06.037. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Panimathi R, Gurusamy E, Mahalakshmi S, Ramadevi K, Kaarthikeyan G, Anil S. Impact of COVID-19 on renal function: A multivariate analysis of biochemical and immunological markers in patients. Cureus. 2022;14(2):e22076. Doi: 10.7759/ cureus.22076. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Tang CF, Ding H, Jiao RQ, Wu XX, Kong LD. Possibility of magnesium supplementation for supportive treatment in patients with COVID-19. Eur J Pharmacol. 2020;886:173546. Doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173546. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Palestinian Ministry of Health (2020): Diagnosis and management & treatment of patients with COVID-19.
14.
Vandenberg O, Martiny D, Rochas O, van Belkum A, Kozlakidis Z. Considerations for diagnostic COVID-19 tests. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;19(3):171-83. Doi: 10.1038/ s41579-020-00461-z. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Mikolajek H, Weckener M, Brotzakis ZF, Huo J, Dalietou EV, Le Bas A, et al. Correlation between the binding affinity and the conformational entropy of nanobody SARS-CoV-2 spike protein complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2022;119(31):e2205412119. Doi: 10.1073/pnas.2205412119. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Sadiq A, Khurram M, Malik J, Chaudhary NA, Khan MM, Yasmeen T, et al. Correlation of biochemical profile at admission with severity and outcome of COVID-19. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2021;11(6):740-46. Doi: 10.1080/20009666.2021.1974161. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Voets PJ, Frölke SC, Vogtländer NP, Kaasjager KA. COVID-19 and dysnatremia: A comparison between COVID-19 and non COVID-19 respiratory illness. SAGE Open Med. 2021;9:20503121211027778. Doi: 10.1177/20503121211027778. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Yasari F, Akbarian M, Abedini A, Vasheghani M. The role of electrolyte imbalances in predicting the severity of COVID-19 in the hospitalized patients: A cross-sectional study. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):14732. Doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19264-8. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Nakanishi H, Suzuki M, Maeda H, Nakamura Y, Ikegami Y, Takenaka Y, et al. Differential diagnosis of COVID-19: Importance of measuring blood lymphocytes, serum electrolytes, and olfactory and taste functions. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2020;252(2):109-19. Doi: 10.1620/tjem.252.109. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Quilliot D, Bonsack O, Jaussaud R, Mazur A. Dysmagnesemia in Covid-19 cohort patients: Prevalence and associated factors. Magnes Res. 2020;33(4):114-22. Doi: 10.1684/mrh.2021.0476. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Malinowska J, Malecka-Gieldowska M, Balkowska D, Borecka K, Ciepiela O. Hypermagnesemia and hyperphosphatemia are highly prevalent in patients with COVID-19 and increase the risk of death. Int J Infect Dis. 2022;122:543-49. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.06.057. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Sharma R, Heidari A, Johnson RH, Advani S, Petersen G. Serum magnesium levels in hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2. J Investig Med. 2022;70(2):409- 14. Doi: 10.1136/jim-2021-001948. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Cappellini F, Brivio R, Casati M, Cavallero A, Contro E, Brambilla P. Low levels of total and ionized calcium in blood of COVID-19 patients. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020;58(9):e171-73. Doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0611. PMID: 32459190. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Liu J, Han P, Wu J, Gong J, Tian D. Prevalence and predictive value of hypocalcemia in severe COVID-19 patients. J Infect Public Health. 2020;13(9):1224-28. Doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.05.029. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Lippi G, South AM, Henry BM. Electrolyte imbalances in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Ann Clin Biochem. 2020;57(3):262-65. Doi: 10.1177/0004563220922255. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Alemzadeh E, Alemzadeh E, Ziaee M, Abedi A, Salehiniya H. The effect of low serum calcium level on the severity and mortality of Covid patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2021;9(4):1219-28. Doi: 10.1002/iid3.528. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Machiraju PK, Alex NM, Safinaaz, Vadamalai V. Hyponatremia in coronavirus disease-19 patients: A retrospective analysis. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2021;8:20543581211067069. Doi: 10.1177/20543581211067069. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Malieckal DA, Uppal NN, Ng JH, Jhaveri KD, Hirsch JS; Northwell Nephrology COVID-19 Research Consortium. Electrolyte abnormalities in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Clin Kidney J. 2021;14(6):1704-07. Doi: 10.1093/ ckj/sfab060.
29.
Chen D, Li X, Song Q, Hu C, Su F, Dai J, et al. Assessment of hypokalemia and clinical characteristics in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Wenzhou, China. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(6):e2011122-e. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Alfano G, Ferrari A, Fontana F, Perrone R, Mori G, Ascione E, et al. Modena Covid-19 Working Group (MoCo19). Hypokalemia in Patients with COVID-19. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2021;25(4):401-09. Doi: 10.1007/s10157-020-01996-4. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Sarvazad H, Cahngaripour SH, Eskandari Roozbahani N, Izadi B. Evaluation of electrolyte status of sodium, potassium and magnesium, and fasting blood sugar at the initial admission of individuals with COVID-19 without underlying disease in Golestan Hospital, Kermanshah. New Microbes New Infect. 2020;38:100807. Doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100807. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Wang R, He M, Kang Y. Hypophosphatemia at admission is associated with increased mortality in COVID-19 patients. Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:5313-22. Doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S319717. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Rao S, Ali K, Dennis J, Berdine G, Test V, Nugent K. Analysis of glucose levels in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 during the first phase of this pandemic in West Texas. J Prim Care Community Health. 2020;11:2150132720958533. Doi: 10.1177/2150132720958533. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Hong XW, Chi ZP, Liu GY, Huang H, Guo SQ, Fan JR, et al. Characteristics of renal function in patients diagnosed with COVID-19: An observational study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020;7:409. Doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00409. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Medetalibeyoglu A, Catma Y, Senkal N, Ormeci A, Cavus B, Kose M, et al. The effect of liver test abnormalities on the prognosis of COVID-19. Ann Hepatol. 2020;19(6):614-21. Doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2020.08.068. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Wu Y, Li H, Guo X, Yoshida EM, Mendez-Sanchez N, Levi Sandri GB, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and prognosis of abnormal liver biochemical tests in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatol Int. 2020;14(5):621-37. Doi: 10.1007/s12072-020-10074-6. [crossref][PubMed]
37.
Moon AM, Barritt AS. Elevated liver enzymes in patients with COVID-19: Look, but not too hard. Dig Dis Sci. 2021;66(6):1767-69. Doi: 10.1007/s10620-020- 06585-9. [crossref][PubMed]
38.
Yang J, Liao X, Yin W, Wang B, Yue J, Bai L, et al. Study of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia Infected Critically Ill Patients in Sichuan Province (SUNRISE) Group. Elevated cardiac biomarkers may be effective prognostic predictors for patients with COVID-19: A multicenter, observational study. Am J Emerg Med. 2020;39:34041. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.10.013. [crossref][PubMed]
39.
Zhang Q, Zheng Z, Zhang Y. Association of myocardial enzyme abnormality with clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19: A retrospective study. Dis Markers. 2021;2021:3440714. Doi: 10.1155/2021/3440714. [crossref][PubMed]
40.
Liu J, Zhang L, Chen Y, Wu Z, Dong X, Teboul JL, et al. Association of sex with clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients: A retrospective analysis of 1190 cases. Respir Med. 2020;173:106159. Doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2020.106159. [crossref][PubMed]
41.
Tezcan ME, Dogan Gokce G, Sen N, Zorlutuna Kaymak N, Ozer RS. Baseline electrolyte abnormalities would be related to poor prognosis in hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 patients. New Microbes New Infect. 2020;37:100753. Doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100753. [crossref][PubMed]
42.
Sjöström A, Rysz S, Sjöström H, Höybye C. Electrolyte and acid-base imbalance in severe COVID-19. Endocr Connect. 2021;10(7):805-14. Doi: 10.1530/EC-21-0265.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63100.18157

Date of Submission: Jan 25, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Feb 23, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Apr 24, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 08, 2023
• Manual Googling: Mar 22, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Apr 12, 2023 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com