Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 36988

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : July | Volume : 17 | Issue : 7 | Page : AC01 - AC05 Full Version

Effects of Immobilised Stress on Neuronal Plasticity of Pyramidal Neurons in Prefrontal Cortex of Female Wistar Rats- An Experimental Study


Published: July 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/64222.18200
Sujit Kumar Thakur, Manjunath V Motagi, Yuganti Vaidya, Shailesh Adhikari, Shalik Ram Adhikari

1. Lecturer, Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Nepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Anatomy, Sri Aurobindo Medical College and PG Institute, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India. 3. Professor and Head, Department of Anatomy, Peoples College of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India. 4. Lecturer, Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Nepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal. 5. Lecturer, Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Nepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Correspondence Address :
Manjunath V Motagi,
Professor and Head, Department of Anatomy, Sri Aurobindo Medical College and PGI, Indore-453555, Madhya Pradesh, India.
E-mail: drmanjunathm@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Stress is a normal response of an organism to any threat which can be physical, emotional or psychological. Positive stress is called eustress whereas negative stress is distress. Neuronal plasticity is a term which indicates the changes in brain. There can be structural and functional neuroplasticity.

Aim: To study the neuronal plasticity (dendritic branching pattern and their lengths) of pyramidal neurons in Prefrontal Cortex (PFC) of female wistar rats after immobilised stress.

Materials and Methods: It was an experimental study conducted in Nepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal, from May 2021 to July 2022. Based on the age, 24 female rats were divided into three groups; group A more than 12 weeks, group B 8 to 12 weeks and group C 3 to 7 weeks. Each group contained eight rats, of which, four were control and four were experimental. Experimental rats underwent immobilised stress. After stress protocol, rats were sacrificed and PFC was taken out and stained. The images of neurons were taken by confocal microscope. The neuronal reconstruction was done using Interactive Microscopy Image Analysis (IMARIS) software for dendritic lengths. The parameters in apical dendrite category-length of principal dendrite, branch points and lengths of different branches were compared between control and stressed groups. In basal dendrite category-number of basal dendrites, lengths of different basal dendrites and branch points were compared between control and stressed groups using unpaired t-test. The data was analysed with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0.

Results: It was observed that there was a statistically significant increase in all basal dendrite parameters in experimental category as compared with controls in group A with p-value <0.001, and in group B, significant increase in branch points with a p-value <0.001 in experimental category, and significant increase in branch length of basal dendrites in group C of experimental rats with p-value <0.001. The parameters related to apical dendrites of pyramidal neurons also showed significant shrinkage in experimental rats as compared to control groups. Especially in group C, all the apical dendrite parameters were significantly decreased compared with control group (p-values 0.013, 0.001 and 0.006 for principal dendrite’s length, branch points and branch lengths, respectively).

Conclusion: Stress induces neuronal plasticity in pyramidal neurons of PFC of rats. Findings of this study suggest stress induces significant increase in the basal dendrite parameters of pyramidal neurons of PFC of all age group of rats, especially in the rats of more than 12 weeks age and significant shrinkage of apical dendrites was seen in all age group of rats and more so in the rats between 3 to 7 weeks of age.

Keywords

Brain plasticity, Dendrites, Projection neurons

Stress, in the context of biology is a normal response of an organism to any threat which can be physical, emotional or psychological. This ability to stand a stress is vital for survival (1). The things which cause stress are known as stressors. Stressors can be external (environmental) or internal (illness or induced by different interventions) (2). All the types of stresses may not have negative effect. It depends upon tolerance of body to stress and overcome laziness to improve performance, hence stress can be healthy, challenging and positive and termed as eustress. Stress becomes negative when the quantity of it exceeds the ability to cope, the body systems get fatigued resulting in behavioural and physical problems. This stress can be termed as distress (2).

Stress has been shown to produce long-term effects in cognitive-emotional response in rats as neonatal experiences. For example, the rats raised by nurturing mothers have higher levels of serotonin activity as compared to rats raised without nurturing mothers (3). Stress induces series of changes in the cardiovascular, nervous, immune and endocrine system.

Neuronal plasticity is a term which indicates changes in brain. Brain is not “hard wired” with fixed neuronal circuits. Structural neuroplasticity includes synaptic plasticity, synaptogenesis, neurogenesis and changes in different parts of neuron etc., and formation of new neurons is called neurogenesis (4). Stress has effects on dendritic morphology, spine density and synapse numbers in different brain areas. The major areas of brain affected by stress are hippocampus, amygdala and the PFC etc., (5). In humans and in primates, neuroscientists use granular and orbital part of frontal cortex as PFC. For rodents, research use the term PFC to refer the same area which is called as Anterior Cingulate Cortex (ACC) in primates (6). Rats do not have frontal granular cortex. PFC includes areas along the anterior medial wall of cerebral hemisphere (7).

In this research, authors have included pyramidal neurons of subregions of PFC, which are medial frontal cortex (mPFC) and Orbitofrontal Cortex (OFC) (orbital and insular areas) (5). In pyramidal neurons of the cortex, apical dendrites are long which extends from apex of the cell body (soma). The longest and thickest apical dendrite is considered as principal dendrite. The points from where other branches take origin from principal dendrite are called branch points. Other short dendrites extended from cell body (soma) are considered as basal dendrites. The extra branches taking origin from any of the basal dendrite were also considered as branch points (8).

The pyramidal neurons of OFC show increase in dendritic length and spine density due to stress in contrast to changes in mPFC.

The effects of stress on pyramidal neurons of mPFC are different for male and female. Female do not show a general shortening of dendrites as compared to male because of effects of estradiol (7). Chronic stress decreases lengths of apical dendrites and branch numbers whereas it does not alter basilar dendrite’s lengths and branch numbers (5),(9). Due to the above mentioned reasons, the primary focus of this research was to see the stress related changes in pyramidal neurons of PFC of female Wistar rats. The Wistar rats are the best choice for this research because they are easy to keep, breed easily, respond to alterations in environment and can be easily trained. They are also used in neuroscience research because they did not get easily habituated (10). Hence, the main aim of this study was to find out the effects of immobilised stress on neuronal plasticity of (dendritic branching pattern and their lengths) of pyramidal neurons in PFC of female Wistar rats and to compare with the control group.

Material and Methods

This was an experimental study carried out at Nepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal from May 2021 to July 2022, after obtaining Institutional Review Committee clearance (IRC) from the institution (IRC reg No 425 April 2021). Total 24 female Wistar rats of different age groups were bought from Department of Plant Resources, Thapathali, Kathmandu at different times according to requirement. All 24 rats were divided into three groups as per age of the rats;

• Group A- More than 12 weeks
• Group B- 8-12 weeks
• Group C- 3-7 weeks

Every group was subdivided in to experimental and control rats consisting of four rats each.

Sample size calculation: The sample size was calculated based on degree of freedom (E), with formula (E=Total number of animals-Total number of groups). As per this formula, if the E Value is 20 and above then the sample size is more than adequate. In the present study, the E value is 21 that is (E=total number of animals 24-Total number of groups 3=21) (11).

Separate cages were arranged for control and experimental group rats. Food (Boiled Bengal grams, boiled wheat, lettuce, vitamin A powder) and water provided ad libitum. Day/night cycles of 12 hours were maintained (12). The rats were kept for 3-4 days for acclimatisation before beginning of experiment (13). The tails of the rats were coloured with waterproof colour markers. Red colour was used for control rats while blue colour was used for experimental rats.

Inclusion criteria: Healthy active female Wistar rats with different age groups as per the study protocol were included.

Exclusion criteria: Deceased/Died rats were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

Stress protocol: Restriction of the freedom of locomotion and exploration, better known and referred to as restraint or immobilisation is a kind of deprivation paradigm, is probably the most widespread method of stress induction was used in this study (12).

Experimental rats of different groups were placed individually into transparent acrylic restrainers for 90 minutes everyday for a week followed by daily for two hour over a period of two weeks. In an attempt to avoid habituation caused by repetitive homotypic stress, rats were restrained at random times of day during the light-dark cycle (8 am-8 pm) as shown in (Table/Fig 1). A corresponding control group was maintained. After stress protocol, rats were anaesthetised with Diethyl Ether (C2H5)2O. Thoracic cavity was opened and through the left ventricle initially rats were perfused with 0.9% NaCl (normal saline) and fixed with 100-150 mL of fixative (4% paraformaldehyde) as shown in (Table/Fig 2) (14). Cervical dislocation technique was used to prevent pre and postsynaptic effects of anaesthesia. A surgical scissor was used to remove head with a cut posterior from the ears. Brains were removed with the olfactory bulbs preserved as shown in (Table/Fig 3). Olfactory bulbs were used as the landmarks for PFC (15),(16).

Staining procedure: FD Rapid Golgi Stain™ Kit (Small) was used as the staining solution.

It consists of:

a. Solution A-125 mL
b. Solution B-125 mL
c. Solution C-125×2=250 mL
d. Solution D-125 mL
e. Solution E-125 mL

Forty-eight hours prior to sacrifice of rats, same volumes of solutions A and B were mixed and left without stirring in the dark chamber (impregnation solution). A 5 mL of impregnation solution per cubic cm of tissue was used. After brain removal, the PFC tissue was rinsed with doubled distilled water to remove blood stain. A 15 mL conical tube were labelled and filled with 5 mL of impregnation solution each. The brain tissues of all control and experimental rats of particular group were transferred to the conical tubes and left for two weeks at room temperature in the dark chamber. After two weeks, the tissues were transferred into solution C (same amount as impregnation solution) and left in dark at 4°C for one week, then the tissues were transferred into the new vial filled with water. The tissues were washed under running water over night and placed onto histo-cassette and labelled with unique identification number.

After this the tissues were processed in automatic tissue processor which included process of dehydration, clearing, infiltration and embedding, a support matrix was provided by processing and embedding the tissue in wax. The tissues were dehydrated using a series of progressive more concentrated ethanol bath. The following solutions were kept in sequence; 50%, 70%, 80%, and 90% and absolute alcohol (ethanol) twice. The tissues were kept in solutions for one hour each. For clearing, xylene was used. After different concentrations of ethanol, next containers included xylene. The tissues remained in both xylene container for one hour each. Next two container included molten paraffin wax and tissue remained for one hour in each. This process was performed by using automatic “electra” tissue processor (microprocessor based) manufactured by York Scientific Industries Pvt. Ltd.

After the tissues were thoroughly infiltered in wax, blocks were prepared using L-moulds. All the blocks were labelled and sectioned (coronal) at 50 μm on a semi-automatic rotatory microtome. The sections were made to float in distilled water at 100C and then the sections were picked up on Superfrost plus microscope slides. The slides were left in hot air oven at 60°C over night to improve adhesion. Sections were deparaffinised in xylene for three times and it remained in solutions for five minutes each. The sections were hydrated in decreasing concentrations of ethanol, 100%, 95%, 70% and 50% of ethanol twice, five minutes each. Sections were rinsed in distilled water and were kept in double distilled water two times, two minutes each. A solution consisting of one part of solution D, one part solution E and two parts of double distilled water was prepared. Sections were placed in this staining solution for 10 minutes. Sections were kept in double distilled water two times for four minutes each followed by this section and were dehydrated in progressively higher ethanol concentrations, 50%, 75% and 90% for four minutes each. The sections were continued for dehydration in 100% ethanol four times, four minutes each. Sections were cleared in xylene and mounted with Dibutylphthalate Polystyrene Xylene (DPX). The slides were dried at room temperature for 24-48 hours. Slides were protected from light (17).

The images of coronal section of rat brain after staining with Golgi stain were taken using Leica sp8 confocal microscope with 10x and 40x as shown in [Table/Fig-4-6]. These neurons had apical and basal dendrites [Table/Fig-7,8]. Photomultiplier Tubes (PMT) were used and sample was illuminated using a specific laser wavelength. Z-stacks were obtained so as to capture the whole length of the stained neuron. One neuron per image was ensured while imaging the samples. The image acquisition from confocal microscope and neuronal reconstruction from IMARIS software as mentioned below was performed in Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER-PUNE).

Neuronal Reconstruction

The Z-stacks obtained were opened using IMAGE J software. The Z-projects were selected and images were intensified by using maximum intensity. Then the images were imported to IMARIS software. Neurons were traced with the filament tracing wizard in IMARIS semi-automatically as shown in (Table/Fig 9). From each group 32 (16 experimental and 16 control) neurons were reconstructed, so for three groups, total 96 neurons (48 experimental and 48 control) were reconstructed and apical and basal dendrite parameters were measured. The dendritic length was selected and obtained an excel file with branch names with their respective length in μm.

Statistical Analysis

Unpaired t-test was used to compare the parameters of pyramidal neurons between experimental and control group of rats. In apical dendrite category, length of principal dendrite, branch points and lengths of different branches were compared between control and stressed groups. In basal dendrite category, number of basal dendrites, lengths of different basal dendrites and branch points were compared between control and stressed groups. The data was analysed with SPSS version 20.0. The p-value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

The apical and basal dendritic parameters after manual tracing in IMARIS software are presented in (Table/Fig 10),(Table/Fig 11),(Table/Fig 12) as per the groups A, B, C, respectively. In each table, control and stressed (experimental) groups were compared. The percentage changes were also calculated. From the (Table/Fig 10),(Table/Fig 11),(Table/Fig 12), it was observed that for basal dendrite parameters in group A there was statistically highly significant increase in all basal dendrite parameters in experimental category as compared with control group with p-value <0.001, in group B also there was significant increase in branch points (p-value <0.001) dendritic length (p-value 0.003) and numbers (p-value 0.014) of basal dendrites. However in group C, there was a significant increase in numbers of basal dendrite in experimental rats with (p-value <0.001) and branch points (p-value 0.025) except dendritic length which was not significant. It was also observed that there was shrinkage of apical dendrite parameters as compared with control group.

In group C all the apical dendrite parameters were significantly decreased compared with control group with (p-values 0.013, 0.001 and 0.006 for principal dendrite’s length, branch points and branch lengths, respectively). In group B also apical branch points and branch length significantly decreased with p-values 0.002 and 0.035, respectively. In group A only, apical dendrite branch length was significantly decreased with p-value 0.025. Overall there was a significant increase in the all basal dendrite parameters in the rats of more than 12 (group A) weeks of age and significant decrease in all the apical dendrite parameters in the rats between the age group of 3 to 7 (group C) weeks.

Discussion

The present study explored the effects of stress on pyramidal neurons (basal and apical dendrites) of PFC in female Wistar rats. Findings of the present study suggests that stress induces significant increase in the basal dendrite parameters of pyramidal neurons of PFC of all age group of rats, especially in the rats of more than 12 weeks age and significant shrinkage of apical dendrites was seen in all age group of rats and more so in the rats between 3 to 7 weeks of age. In this study, Wistar rats were restrained for 21 days. Same type of stress protocol was also used by McEwen BS and Gianaros PJ (18).

A study conducted by Brown SM et al., demonstrates pronounced changes in the dendritic morphology of pyramidal neurons in medial PFC as a result of a short duration, mild and chronic stress resulted in a selective remodelling of apical dendrites, with atrophy of upto 31% occurring in more distal branches and relative sparing of proximal branches and also mentioned longer-term, more severe stress produced a pronounced decrease in both branch number and branch length in the apical dendrites of pyramidal neurons in medial PFC (19). In the present study, authors have also witnessed atrophy of apical dendrites and it was significant. Cook SC and Wellman CL, in their study mentioned three hours of daily restraint, resulting in average peak corticosterone titters of ~74 μg/dL, produced more pronounced decreases in distal apical arbor (9). Cook SC and Wellman CL and Hauger RL et al., mentioned daily corticosterone administration, which typically produces average peak corticosterone titers of ~95 μg/dL produced similarly pronounced decreases in distal dendritic material accompanied by increases in dendritic material proximal to the soma [9,20]. So the changes which are taking place in the pyramidal neurons may be related to the corticosterone level which increase due to stress. Depending on the level of stress the corticosterone level increases and changes may occur in pyramidal neurons needs to be established.

In this study, authors did not check the corticosterone level in both experimental rats and control rats but it would be interesting to see correlation between level stress with corticosterone levels in the blood and the amount of changes in the pyramidal neurons. Cook SC and Wellman CL, in their study of chronic stress and its effect on dendritic morphology mentioned that, sholl analysis demonstrated a significant alteration of apical dendrites in stressed animals and overall, the number and length of apical dendritic branches was reduced by 18% and 32%, respectively. The reduction in apical dendritic arbor was restricted to distal and higher order branches, and may reflect atrophy of terminal branches: terminal branch number and length were also reduced by 19% and 35%. On the other hand, basilar dendrites were not affected (9). Liston C et al., also mentioned repeated immobilised stress showed contrasting effects on apical dendrites and basal dendrites in PFC. It had been found that apical dendritic material (p-value=0.007) and branching (p-value=0.05) of medial frontal cortex were decreased by 20% and 11%, respectively whereas basal dendritic materials were not affected (p-value=0.69) (21). The apical dendritic branches’ length decreases by 20% and the decrement is more visible in distal apical dendritic branches after stress while basal dendritic lengths remain unchanged (9),(22),(23).

But in this study, apart from atrophy of apical dendrite, significant increase in the basal dendrites were also observed. Sex differences in the effects of stress on mPFC pyramidal neurons was observed by Garrett JE and and Wellman CL and they mentioned pyramidal neurons of mPFC were drawn in three dimensions, and morphology of apical and basilar arbors was quantified and concluded that in males, stress decreased apical dendritic branch number and length, whereas in females, stress increased apical dendritic length. So, finally they concluded stress induced increase in apical dendrites in female rats is oestradiol dependent (24). Contrast to that in this study there was significant decrease in apical dendrites and significant increase in basal dendrites.

Pyramidal cell neuronal plasticity in the PFC was observed due to stress. It needs to be correlated with stress hormones in the blood. Also, the amount of stress correlation with level of stress hormones needs to be seen. Apart from level of stress, stress hormones and its effects on neurons (neuronal plasticity) the decision making behaviour needs to studied for better understanding.

Limitation(s)

As, the research was performed on female rats, the effects of stress on neuronal plasticity need to be established in male Wistar rats as well. The PFC was studied as a whole but not in specific areas of it.

Conclusion

Stress induces neuronal plasticity in pyramidal neurons of PFC of female Wistar rats. Findings of this study suggest immobilised chronic stress induces significant increase in the basal dendrite parameters of pyramidal neurons of PFC of all age group of rats, especially in the rats of more than 12 weeks age and significant shrinkage of apical dendrites was seen in all age group of rats and more so in the rats between 3 to 7 weeks of age. The changes in pyramidal neurons need to be correlated with corticosterone levels in the stressed rats in further future studies.

References

1.
Galvan A, Rahdar A. The neurobiological effects of stress on adolescent decision making. Neuroscience. 2013;249:223-31. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Salleh MR. Life event, stress and illness. Malaysian J Med Sci. 2008;15(4):09-18.
3.
Schneiderman N, Ironson G, Siegel SD. Stress and health: Psychological, behavioural, and biological determinants. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1(Lacey 1967):607-28. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Demarin V, Morovic S, Bene R. Neuroplasticity. Periodicum Biologorum. 2014;116:209-11.
5.
McEwen BS, Morrison JH. Brain on stress: Vulnerability and plasticity of prefrontal cortex over the life course. Neuron. 2013;79(1):16-29. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Laubach M, Amarante LM, Swanson K, White SR. What, if anything, is rodent prefrontal cortex? eNeuro. 2018;5(5):01-14. Doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0315-18.2018. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Kolb B, Gibb R. Plasticity in the prefrontal cortex of adult rats. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015;9:01-11. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Wu YK, Fujishima K, Kengaku M. Differentiation of apical and basal dendrites in pyramidal cells and granule cells in dissociated hippocampal cultures. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):01-16. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Cook SC, Wellman CL. Chronic stress alters dendritic morphology in rat medial prefrontal cortex. J Neurobiol. 2004;60(2):236-48. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Clause BT. The Wistar rat as a right choice: Establishing mammalian standards and the ideal of a standardized mammal. J Hist Biol. 1993;26(2):329-49. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Ilyas M, Adzim M, Simbak N, Atif A. Sample Size Calculation for Animal Studies Using Degree of Freedom (E); an Easy and Statistically Defined Approach for Metabolomics and Genetic Research. Curr Trends Biomedical Eng & Biosci. 2017;10(2):555785. [crossref]
12.
Krinke GJ. George J. Krinke-The Laboratory Rat (Handbook of Experimental Animals)-Academic Press 2000. 1-756.
13.
Capdevila S, Giral M, Ruiz de la Torre JL, Russell RJ, Kramer K. Acclimatization of rats after ground transportation to a new animal facility; Laboratory Animals. 2007;41:255-61. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Miranda EG de, Nascimento VP do, Waisberg DR, Sousa MWG de, Lima MFMB, Silva D dos S, et al. Inhalation anaesthesia equipment for rats with provision of simultaneous anaesthetic and oxygen. Acta Cir Bras. 2011;26(2):140-43. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Gage GJ, Kipke DR, Shain W. Whole animal perfusion fixation for rodents. J Vis Exp. 2012;65:01-09. [crossref]
16.
Herman JP, Watson SJ. The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates (2 nd edition). Trends in Neurosciences. 1987;10:439. [crossref]
17.
Milatovic D, Montine TJ, Zaja-Milatovic S, Madison JL, Bowman AB, Aschner M. Morphometric analysis in neurodegenerative disorders. Curr Protoc Toxicol. 2010;12(16):01-14. [crossref]
18.
McEwen BS, Gianaros PJ. McEwen and Gianaros. Stress allostasis brain plasticity. 2011. Annu Rev Med. 2011;62(1):431-45. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Brown SM, Henning S, Wellman CL. Mild, short-term stress alters dendritic morphology in rat medial prefrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex. 2005;15(11):1714-22. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Hauger RL, Millan MA, Catt KJ, Aguilera G. Differential regulation of brain and pituitary corticotropin-releasing factor receptors by corticosterone. Endocrinology. 1987;120(4):1527-33. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Liston C, Miller MM, Goldwater DS, Radley JJ, Rocher AB, Hof PR, et al. Stress- induced alterations in prefrontal cortical dendritic morphology predict selective impairments in perceptual attentional set-shifting. J Neurosci. 2006;26(30):7870-74. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Radley JJ, Rocher AB, Janssen WGM, Hof PR, McEwen BS, Morrison JH. Reversibility of apical dendritic retraction in the rat medial prefrontal cortex following repeated stress. Exp Neurol. 2005;196(1):199-203. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Bloss EB, Janssen WG, McEwen BS, Morrison JH. Interactive effects of stress and aging on structural plasticity in the prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci. 2010;30(19):6726-31. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Garrett JE, Wellman CL. Chronic stress effects on dendritic morphology in medial prefrontal cortex: Sex differences and estrogen dependence. Neuroscience. 2009;162:195-207.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/64222.18200

Date of Submission: Mar 23, 2023
Date of Peer Review: May 03, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jun 14, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 25, 2023
• Manual Googling: May 17, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jun 13, 2023 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com