Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 52410

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2023 | Month : June | Volume : 17 | Issue : 6 | Page : UR01 - UR04 Full Version

Anaesthesia for Thoracic Aortic Disease: Series of Four Cases


Published: June 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/60416.18025
S Ajanth, S Mano Praveen, Rameshwar A Mhamane, Charulata M Deshpapande

1. Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, TNMC and BYL Nair Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. 2. Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, TNMC and BYL Nair Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, TNMC and BYL Nair Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. 4. Professor and Head, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, TNMC and BYL Nair Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
S Ajanth,
No. 230, 7th Block, Mogappair West, JJ Nagar West, Chennai-37, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: ajinves94@gmail.com

Abstract

Thoracic aortic diseases involving the thoracic aorta, from the ascending aorta, the aortic arch to the descending aorta, can present in the form of aneurysms, dissection, tear and coarctation which usually lead to various complications, requiring surgical intervention. The same can be addressed surgically by ascending aorta replacement or reduction aortoplasty with/without Aortic Valve Replacement (AVR). The anaesthetic implications might vary depending on the pathology of the thoracic aortic disease which can be acute or chronic and, silent or symptomatic. Anaesthetic management of four patients (2 females and 2 males) with varied thoracic aortic diseases have been described in the series, including bicuspid aortic valve with severe aortic stenosis, Ischaemic Heart Disease (IHD) with severe Aortic Regurgitation (AR) with ascending aortic aneurysm, ascending aortic dilatation in a known Takayasu arteritis patient and coarctation of aorta with atrial septal defect. These patients underwent aortoplasty with or without aortic root replacement. Full cardiopulmonary bypass with Deep Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest (DHCA) at 16-20°C was the technique used for these procedures as it prevents stroke and ensures cognitive function. This technique had no additional cannulas, less chances of intimal injury or embolisation and clear surgical fields. During the process of rewarming, Inj. nitroglycerine was started which reduced preload, conserving the myocardium against ischaemic injuries. These patients were successfully managed perioperatively and were discharged with good outcomes postoperatively.

Keywords

Aortic aneurysms, Aortic stenosis, Bicuspid aortic valve, Coarctation of aorta

The spectrum of the thoracic aortic diseases diversifies from aortic aneurysms, acute aortic syndrome including aortic dissection, penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer, aortic rupture, inflammatory conditions, genetic diseases like Marfan syndrome and congenital abnormalities like coarctation of aorta. Thoracic aortic aneurysms are one of the most common thoracic aortic diseases and usually caused by degenerative changes, developing a dilatation in the aorta, where the incidence is around 10.4 per 100,000 person per year (1). The risk factors for the same include smoking, coronary artery disease, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, various genetic conditions like Marfan’s syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, Turner’s syndrome, and inflammatory conditions like Takayasu arteritis and giant cell arteritis (2). Congenital bicuspid aortic valve is generally associated with aortic aneurysm, presenting in 1-2% of the population (3). Coarctation of aorta accounting for 5-10% of congenital heart defects, is a narrowing of the aorta, which occurs at the junction of descending aorta and arch of aorta distal to the left Subclavian Artery (SCA) (4). Classically, aortic root replacement, AVR and reimplantation of the coronary buttons are done in Bentall procedure. However, various modifications of Bentall procedure have been studied as well. Alternatively, aortoplasty is done in certain conditions, which is less radical and an acceptable alternative with comparably good postoperative and long-term outcomes to the classical ascending aorta replacement with a graft (5). The anaesthetic management in the thoracic aortic disease is complicated by perioperative stroke and spinal cord ischaemic injury, acute renal failure, myocardial ischaemia, arrhythmias and limbal ischaemia, which requires the optimal preoperative assessment, planning, meticulous perioperative anaesthetic management.

Case Report

CASE 1

A 39-year-old female presented to the Cardiothoracic and Vascular Outpatient Department with the history of syncope since one year.

On systemic examination, S1S2 along with a systolic murmur over right sternal border at second intercostal space. It was a case of bicuspid aortic valve with severe aortic stenosis posted for AVR with aortoplasty (Table/Fig 1).

Case 2

A 55-year-old male presented to the Cardiothoracic and Vascular Outpatient Department with the history of dyspnoea since 6-7 years. On systemic examination, S1S2 along with a diastolic murmur over right sternal border at second intercostal space. It was a case of ischaemic heart disease- Chronic Stable Angina (CSA) with severe AR with ascending aorta aneurysm posted for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) with AVR and aortic root replacement (Table/Fig 2).

Case 3

A 39-year-old female presented to the Cardiothoracic and Vascular Outpatient Department with the history of chest pain and dyspnoea on exertion since 2 years. On systemic examination, S1S2 along with a diastolic murmur over right sternal border at second intercostal space. It was a case of severe AR with ascending aortic dilatation in a patient of Takayasu arteritis posted for AVR with aortoplasty.

Case 4

A 26-year-old male presented to the Cardiothoracic and vascular outpatient Department with the history of dyspnoea on exertion since 2 years. On systemic examination, S1S2 along with no murmur. It was a case of coarctation of aorta with Atrial Septal Defect (ASD) for repair with prosthetic graft and ASD closure (Table/Fig 3).

Anaesthetic Management

Patients were evaluated thoroughly during the preoperative visit and counselled. On the day of surgery, fasting was confirmed 2and high-risk informed consent was taken. 18 or 20 Gauge (G) peripheral intravenous access was taken in the right upper limb and premedicated with Inj. Fentanyl 1-2 mcg/kg. Right internal jugular 7 French (Fr) Central Venous Catheter (CVC) line and right femoral 4 or 5 Fr. Arterial line were taken under local anaesthesia with Ultrasonography (USG) guidance. The standard monitoring included were pulse oximetry, Electrocardiography (ECG), invasive blood pressure, central venous pressure, capnography, neuromuscular monitoring, entropy, temperature and urine output. Activated Clotting Time (ACT), haemogram, ionogram, blood glucose and serial arterial blood gases were done. Induction was done with Inj. Midazolam 0.03-0.05 mg/kg, Inj. Fentanyl 5-8 mcg/kg, Inj. Etomidate 0.3-0.5 mg/kg and relaxation was achieved with Inj. Atracurium 0.5 mg/kg; maintenance was done with oxygen: Air (60:40): Sevoflurane (1-2%). Intraoperatively, sedation mixture of Inj. Propofol and Inj. Atracurium was started, titrated as per neuromuscular and entropy monitors and continued during Cardiac Pulmonary Bypass (CPB). Inj. unfractionated heparin 300U/kg was given before cannulation and ACT was targeted above 400 seconds.

Repair was done with use of full CPB with deep hypothalamic circulatory arrest. In the Institute, the heart was accessed by a median sternotomy and CPB initiation via cannulation in the ascending aorta or proximal aortic arch. During aortic cross-clamp, an umbilical tape was used to lift the ascending aorta and ensured that, the clamp covers the entire wall of the aorta completely. The AVR was approached through the aortic oblique incision just distal to the coronary ostia and followed-up by aortoplasty/prosthetic graft replacement and then simultaneously CABG and valve repair was done. During rewarming, Inj. Nitroglycerine infusion was started at 0.3 μg/kg/min in all patients as it reduces the preload, protects myocardium against ischaemic injuries and facilitates heparin neutralisation in coronary artery bypass surgeries.

After rewarming, de-airing was done by valsalva manoeuvre and providing head-low position. On achieving sinus rhythm, separation from CPB was initiated and ACT was kept below 120 seconds by giving Inj. Protamine and fresh frozen plasma to help in achieving haemostasis. Heart rate, rhythm and Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) was maintained in all patients and transferred to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for further weaning and management. The patients were discharged from the ICU on the 3rd or 4th postoperative day and discharged successfully from the hospital by 10th day.

Discussion

Thoracic aortic diseases can be of various types, namely, aneurysm, dissection, tear and coarctation. Congenital presentation occurs in the infancy and early childhood due to connective tissue diseases like Marfan syndrome, Turner’s syndrome and polycystic kidney disease. An acquired presentation is mostly due to atherosclerosis, hypertension and inflammatory changes. The indications for the surgery depend on the predicted surgical risks over the risks of medical management. The immediate surgical intervention is necessitated by factors like aneurysmal size >6.5 cm or 6 cm with connective tissue disease, aneurysmal growth >1 cm/year, rupture/acute dissection and symptomatic patients (6). These surgeries are generally associated with high mortality and morbidity with significant perioperative complications like arterial hypertension, cerebral aneurysms, aortic aneurysms, IHD and recoarctation (7). However, the surgical results have improved significantly over time. While the replacement of the aorta with a prosthetic vascular graft is the most common procedure, the aortoplasty, with or without AVR, is an alternative with advantages, namely, less bleeding, shorter CPB and cross-clamp time and lower morbidity and mortality rates (8).

Hence, these complex surgeries require thorough and patient adjusted preoperative evaluation, initiation and maintenance of CPB, neuroprotective strategies, stringent perioperative monitoring and management of complications (9). A thorough preoperative evaluation including functional capacity assessment, risk stratification for each organ’s prediction of postoperative complications and documentation of neurological status is imminent but, can be modified as per the haemodynamic status of the patient and urgency of the surgery. Attention must be given to the cardiac, respiratory, renal and neurological functional status of the patient. Assessment for coronary artery disease must be evaluated simultaneously during the preoperative stage (6). Preoperative preparation of patients involve cessation of smoking and alcohol consumption, ensuring adequate hydration, strict control of hypertension, optimisation of lipid profile with lifestyle and diet modifications, weight reduction and medical management for risk reduction with beta blockers, Angiotensinogen Converting Enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs) and statins (2). Adequate fluid hydration on the day before surgery and hypothermia protection is necessary to prevent the risk of renal failure. Anaesthetic management should be individualised as per the haemodynamic status of the patient, co-morbidities status, nature of surgery and the type of disease. Brain protection strategies are necessary in thoracic aorta surgeries to prevent stroke and preserve cognitive function, which can be ensured by CPB with hypothermia alone (DHCA) direct ante-grade cerebral perfusion of one or more of brachiocephalic arteries (ACP), or retrograde cerebral perfusion via superior venacava (RCP) (2). The cannulation is done via different approaches based on the pathology and outcomes, namely, direct aortic, femoral, subclavian and axillary approaches (9). In the institute, full CPB with DHCA at 16-20°C is the method of choice for the most surgeries involving aorta, as there are no additional cannulas, less risk of intimal injury or embolisation, clear surgical field and technical or perfusion difficulties. Transoesophageal echocardiography, cerebral oxygenation monitoring and neurophysiological monitoring are recommended in almost all procedures, unless contraindicated (2). These patients are at risk of developing neurological complications which can be due to cerebral hypoperfusion, cerebral embolism and inflammatory reactions. Neuromonitoring is necessary to prevent or detect these complications early to stop the progression. Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) is a non invasive method of measuring cerebral tissue oxygen saturation in the frontal area. Even, transcranial doppler is a non invasive method to monitor cerebral blood flow velocity and detect emboli. Epi-aortic echocardiography can be used as an allied monitoring technique to prevent or minimise cerebral injury (10). Other routine measures like, neutral head position, maintaining PaCO2 above 40 mmHg, MAP >60 mmHg, maintenance of pump flow to 2.5 L/m2/min, haematocrit of above 20%, and deeper plane of anaesthesia (10). Perioperative bleeding/coagulopathy is one of the commonest complications associated with the aortic surgeries. The coagulation factors undergo drastic changes in the surgery, like, activation and consumption of thrombin in CPB and activation of intrinsic coagulation pathway as well as platelets by the exposed collagen (11). It is essential to ensure adequate haemostasis by administration of antifibrinolytics, usage of protamine to reverse the residual effects of heparin, and blood products like fresh frozen plasma, cryoprecipitate and platelets using the point-of-care tests. Instead, prothrombin concentrate complex or rVIIa can be considered in ongoing bleeding.

The main goal of anaesthetic management was to maintain the cardiovascular stability, avoiding hypertension and tachycardia, as the perioperative period is characterised by dramatic fluctuations in the blood pressure (12). It is necessary to maintain MAP >45 mmHg distal to clamp, normocarbia, normoglycaemia, mild to moderate hypothermia and minimising the cross clamp time (<30 minutes) to ensure the spinal cord and cerebral perfusion. Adequate analgesia and stringent blood pressure maintenance are ensured to prevent hypertensive events in the postoperative stage, which is usually seen in 17-50% of patients (12),(13).

Conclusion

The thoracic aortic diseases are frequently associated with high perioperative mortality and morbidity. Vigilant perioperative anaesthetic management along with meticulous surgical care is necessary to improve the prognosis. Special care needs to be given for cardiac and neurological protection, and postoperative surveillance.

References

1.
Clouse WD, Hallett JW Jr., Schaff HV, Gayari MM, Ilstrup DM, Melton LJ 3rd. Improved prognosis of thoracic aortic aneurysms: A population-based study. JAMA. 1998;280:1926-29. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, Bossone E, Bartolomeo RD, Eggebrecht H, et al. ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: Document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2014;35(41):2873-926. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Braverman AC, Guven H, Beardslee MA, Makan M, Kates AM, Moon MR. The bicuspid aortic valve. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2005;30:470-522. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Gargiulo G, Pace Napoleone C, Angeli E, Oppido G. Neonatal coarctation repair using extended end-to-end anastomosis. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;2008(328):mmcts.2007.002691. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Gill M, Dunning J. Is reduction aortoplasty (with or without external wrap) an acceptable alternative to replacement of the dilated ascending aorta? Interact Cardiovasc Thora Surg. 2009;9(4):693-97. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Agarwal S, Kendall J, Quarterman C. Perioperative management of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysms. BJA Education. 2019;19(4):119-25. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Kozyrev IA, Kotin NA, Averkin II, Ivanov AA, Latypov AA, Gordeev ML, et al. Modified technique for coarctation of aorta with hypoplastic distal aortic arch. J Card Surg. 2021;36(6):2063-69.[crossref][PubMed]
8.
Na KJ, Kim JS, Park KH, Lim C. Wrapping of an ascending aortic aneurysm with the multiple boot-straps technique in a patient undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;48(3):206-09. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Peterss S, Pichlmaier M, Curtis A, Luehr M, Born F, Hagl C. Patient management in aortic arch surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;51:i4-i14. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Bashir M, Shaw M, Desmond M, Kuduvalli M, Field M, Oo A. Cerebral protection in hemi-aortic arch surgery. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2(2):239-44.
11.
Li J, Guan X, Liu O, Wang X, Liu Y, Li H, et al. Changes in coagulation factor XII and its function during aortic arch surgery for acute aortic dissection-a prospective observational study. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(7):4006-16. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Grewal J. Coarctation of the aorta. Anaesthesia Tutorial of the Week. 2012;265.
13.
Yao FSF, Hemmings HC, Malhotra V, Fong J, Artusio JF. Yao & Artusio’s Anesthesiology: Problem-oriented Patient Management. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2021.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/60416.18025

Date of Submission: Sep 23, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Dec 23, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Mar 01, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jun 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 01, 2022
• Manual Googling: Feb 25, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Feb 28, 2023 (11%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com