Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 43303

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : June | Volume : 17 | Issue : 6 | Page : SC05 - SC09 Full Version

Screening for Latent and Active Tuberculosis in Paediatric Contacts of Tuberculosis Patients: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: June 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/60860.17996
Gursharan Singh Narang, Preeti Malhotra, Rahul Puri, Ashwani Kumar

1. Professor, Department of Paediatrics, SGRDUHS, Amritsar, Punjab, India. 2. Professor, Department of Paediatrics, SGRDUHS, Amritsar, Punjab, India. 3. Junior Resident, Department of Paediatrics, SGRDUHS, Amritsar, Punjab, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, SGRDUHS, Amritsar, Punjab, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Ashwani Kumar,
Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, SGRDUHS, PO Vallah, Mehta Road, Amritsar-143501, Punjab, India.
E-mail: docashwani82@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Globally, World Health Organisation (WHO) estimate suggests that, one million cases of Tuberculosis (TB) occur among children (approximate 10% of the total 9.6 million TB cases). As per Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP), high importance and priority is given to the household contacts and paediatric age group (especially <6 years). Since, transmission can happen at any time from index case to the contact (before diagnosis or during treatment), all contacts of TB patients should be screened.

Aim: To focus on the screening of paediatric contacts of TB positive patients by Mantoux test and to find out active and latent TB.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Paediatrics at Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Amritsar, Punjab, India. The duration of the study was 16 months, from February 2020 to June 2021. Participants, who were proven cases, either sputum positive or clinically diagnosed and were less than 18 years of age were included. Contacts in whom Isoniazid Preventive Therapy (IPT) had been started were excluded. The candidates who tested Mantoux positive and had symptoms of TB were further screened by following test chest X-ray, Ultrasonography (USG) abdomen, Microscopy for Acid Fast Bacilli (AFB), Cartridge Based Nucliec Acid Amplification Test (CBNAAT), Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) analysis and contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The data collected was analysed statistically with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0 and the level of significance was determined p-value <0.05 as insignificant, p-value >0.05 as significant and p-value <0.001 as highly significant.

Results: A total of 82 contacts were included. Out of these, 60 children had no organ system involvement, whilst 11 had lymphadenopathy, five had respiratory involvement and six had abdominal involvement. Out of 82 contacts, 23 children tested Mantoux positive and 59 tested negative. Out of 23 Mantoux positive contacts 16 (19.51%) had latent TB and only 1 (2.44%) had active TB.

Conclusion: A significant number of children in contact with TB positive patients were found to have latent TB, and it is possible that, there can be activation from latent to active TB later on in these children.

Keywords

Extrapulmonary, Isoniazid, Mantoux, Paucibacillary, Pulmonary

The tuberculosis is a communicable disease, that is a major cause of ill health, one of the top10 causes of death worldwide and the leading cause of death from a single infectious agent (ranking above Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (HIV/AIDS) (1). It is caused by the bacillus Mycobacterium Tuberculosis (MTB), which is spread when people who are sick with TB expel bacteria into the air; for example, by coughing. It typically affects the lungs (pulmonary TB) but, can also affect other sites (extrapulmonary TB). About a quarter of the world’s population is infected with MTB and thus, at risk of developing TB disease (1). Globally, WHO estimated that one million cases of TB occur among children (approximate 10% of the total 9.6 million TB cases) with 233,000 deaths based on an extrapolation from estimates of adult TB (1). In India, an estimated 2.2 lac children become ill with TB each year (22% of global TB burden) (2). It is also known that, about 10% of the cases reported to RNTCP are from children under 14 years of age (3). Recently, childhood TB is gaining more attention as it contributes considerably to childhood morbidity and mortality and there have been several research agendas and calls to action for childhood TB (3). Following inhalation to the lungs, MTB bacilli may disseminate to other organs via haematogenous spread, causing Extra Pulmonary TB (EPTB) (3).

Children often have an atypical clinical presentation (including extra-pulmonary disease) and the classical triad of adult TB: cough, night sweats and weight loss is often absent (2). Constitutional symptoms may include failure to thrive and reduced playfulness, absenteeism from school; low grade or intermittent fever is less frequently seen (2). For children with suspicion of pulmonary TB, the usual presenting symptoms are a persistent, non remitting cough or wheeze that is unresponsive to the treatment for an alternative cause (e.g., bacterial pneumonia) (2). Secondly, collection of good quality specimens for diagnosing childhood TB is challenging (2). For Pulmonary Tuberculosis (PTB) suspects, expectorated sputum is not always available in young children because, they may not produce sputum or swallow their sputum (2). A gastric aspirate is therefore, recommended for those who are unable to expectorate sputum, but the gastric aspiration procedure requires overnight fasting, hospital admission and is invasive (2).

With current diagnostics, even with optimal conditions, the TB confirmation rate is extremely low, due to the difficulty to collect the appropriate specimen and the low bacterial load (paucibacillary) in paediatric specimens (4). Therefore, childhood TB treatment is often empiric without laboratory evidence, resulting in both over and under-diagnosis (4). In RNTCP, screening of contacts has been an important function with programmatic monitoring (4). The national strategic plan for TB elimination 2017-2025 has bold strategies where in contact tracing will be made more rigorous, expansive and accountable (4). The expected end results are that, contacts of most of the TB patients will be screened with more secondary cases being detected and treated (4). They gave high importance and priority to the household contacts and paediatric age group (especially <6 years) (4). Since, transmission can happen at any time from index case to the contact (before diagnosis or during treatment), all contacts of TB patients should be screened (4). Accurate and rapid diagnosis are the keys to control the disease, yet, the traditional tests for TB produce results that are either inaccurate or take too long time to be definitive (5). A fast and reliable diagnostic method that would differentiate between active and Latent TB Infection (LTBI) is also lacking, especially in case of paediatric population (5). Currently, diagnosis of pulmonary TB in India is primarily based on smear microscopy results, with provision for clinical and radiography based diagnosis for those whose sputum smear results are negative (5).

The risk of infection with TB {as measured by Tuberculin Skin Test (TST)} is greatest if the contact is close and with a case of sputum smear-positive disease (3). This illustrates that child contact screening is important especially for close contacts of sputum smear-positive cases because, they have such a high risk of infection (3). Contact history (including closeness and type of source case of TB disease) is important for children with suspected TB disease (3). In resource-limited settings, the focus of contact screening is on contacts of smear-positive cases because of greater risk and limited capacity for screening (3). However, cases of smear-negative pulmonary TB can also transmit infection (3); study suggest that, increased grades of smear positivity of source case is associated with increased risk of infection in child contacts (3). Children upto five years of age, who are close contacts of a microbiologically confirmed pulmonary TB patient within the past three months, should be evaluated for active TB by a medical officer/paediatrician (3). After excluding active TB he/she should be given Isoniazid preventive therapy (INH) irrespective of their BCG or nutritional status (3). Persistent bacterial viability is seen in LTBI, however, there is no proof of clinically active TB and the host stays asymptomatic (6). Therefore, one of the ways to control TB is to consider treating all LTBIs (6). Children are prone to acquire tubercular infection while living with adult TB patients, who are sputum smear-positive making contact tracing is an important tool to control tubercular infection in the community (7). The present study focussed on the screening of paediatric contacts of TB positive patients for active and latent TB.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Paediatrics at Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Amritsar, Punjab, India. The duration of the study was 16 months, from February 2020 to June 2021. Approval of Institutional Ethics Committee was taken prior to the study (SGRDU/cont/thesis/20826).

Inclusion criteria: Paediatric contacts of TB positive patients (proven cases either sputum positive or clinically diagnosed) registered in chest and TB department who were less than 18 years of age included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Contacts in whom IPT had been started were excluded.

Sample size was not calculated and it was a duration based study. All patients reporting during the study period were considered as source cases.

Study Procedure

The candidates who tested Mantoux positive and had symptoms of TB were further screened by following test chest X-ray, USG abdomen, microscopy for AFB, CBNAAT, CSF analysis and contrast MRI (Table/Fig 1). Mantoux test also called Tuberculin skin tests (TST) is an intradermal injection of Purified Protein Derivative (PPD). It is an immunological test that elicits delayed type hypersensitivity. A standard dose of 2 Tuberculin Units (2TU) was administered intradermally and induration was noted in 48-72 hours later. An induration of atleast 10 mm was considered positive. In HIV co-infected cases, severe malnourished and immune compromised cases 5 mm might be taken as the cut off (3). The candidates who tested Mantoux positive and had symptoms of TB were further screened by following test:

• Chest X-ray PA view was done for finding such as military pattern, hilar and/or paratracheal lymphadenopathy with or without parenchymal involvement and fibrocavitary lesions. Specificity of these radiological findings increases in a child with TB symptoms and positive TST. All presumptive TB cases with these radiological patterns were considered probable TB and subjected to microbiology to confirm the diagnosis. In a case, microbiological investigations come out to be negative these children were considered cases of clinically diagnosed TB (8).
• USG abdomen was done and features like lymphadenopathy, peritoneal thickening, omental thickening, bowel wall thickening and ascites were looked for (8).
• Microscopy for Acid Fast Bacilli (AFB)- two samples of at least 1 mL gastric lavage or induced sputum were sent for microscopy 24 hours. Sputum smears after Ziehl-Neelsen staining was examined under oil immersion microscopy (8). A minimum of one slide positive even for single AFB/100 fields was taken as positive for MTB and a minimum of two sputum samples negative for AFB evaluated for 100 fields were declared as negative (8).
• Cartridge Based Nucliec Acid Amplification Test (CBNAAT)- 1 mL of sputum or gastric lavage sample was collected in sterile container. The sample was diluted with three times the reagent (lysis buffer-NaOH+isopropyl alcohol), incubated at room temperature and loaded into the cartridge for automated analysis with results in 100 minutes. Detection of mycobacteria and rifampicin resistance were carried out in the same setting (8).
• Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) analysis (wherever necessary)- CSF was checked for leucocyte counts ranging from 10 to 500 cells/mm3 (occasionally higher) (majority lymphocytes), glucose below 40 mg/dL (CSF glucose/blood glucose below 0.5 and protein (more than 100 mg/dL) (8).
• Contrast MRI (wherever required)- MRI could be done for finding the abnormalities such as, meningeal enhancements, infarcts and tuberculomas especially of lesions involving the brains stems (8).

Latent Tuberculosis (LTB)- Persons with LTBI do not feel sick and do not have any symptoms. They are infected with MTB, but do not have TB disease. The only sign of TB infection is a positive reaction to the tuberculin skin test or TB blood test. Persons with LTBI are not infectious and cannot spread TB infection to others (2).

Active Tuberculosis (ATB)- In some children, TB bacteria overcome the defences of the immune system and begin to multiply, resulting in TB disease (9).

A close contact is defined as living in the same household or in frequent contact with a source case (e.g., care giver) with sputum smear-positive TB. Source cases, who are sputum smear-negative but culture-positive are also infectious, but to a much lesser degree (9).

These contacts were screened and were subjected to detailed history taking, clinical examination and investigations. At the end of the study, all the data was collected and statistically analysed.

Statistical Analysis

The data collected was analysed statistically with SPSS version 26.0 to draw relevant conclusions. For non parametric data, Chi-square test was applied. The level of significance was determined as its ‘p-value’ with p-value >0.05 as insignificant, p-value <0.05 as significant and p-value <0.001 as highly significant.

Results

A total of 272 TB positive patients were registered in Directly Observed Therapy (DOTS) centre for TB treatment. Among these only 48 source cases met the inclusion criteria (93 source cases did not have any contacts, 30 did not have any paediatric contacts, 65 did not come for follow-up, 36 did not give consent) (Table/Fig 2).

A total of 82 contacts of these source cases were included in the study (Table/Fig 2).

Mantoux test was performed on contacts who fit in inclusion criteria and 23 (28.05%) were found to be positive and 59 (71.95%) were found to be negative (Table/Fig 2). Out of 23 Mantoux positive contacts 13 had an induration of 10 to 15 mm, nine contacts had induration of >15 mm, while only one contact had a reaction of 10 mm. The mean size of induration was 14.1±4.45 mm. Out of Mantoux positive contacts males constituted 14 (60.89%) and females constituted 9 (39.13%), while in Mantoux negative contacts 28 (47.54%) were females and 31 (52.54%) were males. Maximum number of Mantoux positive contacts belonged to age group <5 years (10, 43.47%) followed by 6-11 years (9, 39.13%) and least number belonged to 11-18 years (4, 17.39%) age group. While in Mantoux negative contacts maximum number belonged to 11-18 years (25, 42.37%) age group, while 19 (32.2%) belong to 6-10 years age group and 15 (25.42%) belonged to <5 years age. Mean age of all contacts was 8.51±4.55 years. Out of 23 Mantoux positive contacts 17 (73.91%) belonged to rural area while 6 (26.08%) belonged to urban area. In 59 Mantoux negative contacts 33 (55.93%) belonged to rural area while 26 (44.06%) belonged to urban area. Difference was statistically insignificant (p-value=0.133) (Table/Fig 3).

A 2 (28.6%) out of 7 symptomatic Mantoux positive contacts had chest radiograph suggestive of TB while, 6 (37.5%) out of 16 asymptomatic Mantoux positive contacts had a chest X-ray suggestive of TB. Out of 20 symptomatic Mantoux negative contacts chest X-ray was done of seven contacts and five were suggestive of TB (Table/Fig 4).

Out of 23 Mantoux positive contacts CBNAAT of gastric lavage/induced sputum sample was done for 19 (82.6%) patients MTB was detected in only 1 (4.3%). Out of 20 symptomatic Mantoux negative contacts CBNAAT of gastric lavage/induced sputum sample was done for only 6 (30%) and MTB was detected in only 1 (5%) contact (Table/Fig 5).

Out of 23 Mantoux positive contacts, 4 (17.39%) contacts had lymphadenopathy. Out of seven symptomatic Mantoux positive contacts one had left-sided cervical lymphadenopathy while two had right-sided cervical lymphadenopathy. Only one asymptomatic Mantoux positive contact presented with bilateral cervical lymphadenopathy. In all the screened contacts, respiratory system involvement was in 6 (7.31%), abdominal involvement was in 5 (6.09%), lymphnode involvement was in 11 (13.4%). None of the contacts had involvement of CNS, skeletal system (Table/Fig 6).

Ultrasound abdomen was done of all symptomatic Mantoux positive contacts out of which all were normal. Out of 20 symptomatic Mantoux negative contacts USG abdomen was done for five out of which three came out to be normal. One had mesenteric lymphadenopathy while one had ilial wall thickening. USG abdomen was also performed in contacts (Table/Fig 7).

Out of seven symptomatic Mantoux positive contacts 4 (57.14%) had grandparents as source case and 2 (28.57%) had parents as their source, while in symptomatic Mantoux positive contacts 8 (50%) had parents and 3 (18.75%) siblings as their source case. Out of 20 symptomatic Mantoux negative contacts maximum had parents 10 (50.0%) as source case followed by siblings 5 (25.0%). Also, in asymptomatic Mantoux positive contacts maximum had parents 20 (51.2%) followed by siblings 13 (33.4%) as their source case (Table/Fig 8). In the present study, out of 23 Mantoux positive contacts 16 (19.51%) had latent TB and only 1 (2.44%) had active TB.

Discussion

In developing countries like India, TB is an important cause of morbidity and mortality among children (10). Because of the paucibacillary nature of collected specimens in children, there is difficulty in diagnosing the recent infection and active disease (10). Non specific symptoms and delayed diagnosis often make the exact estimation of the disease burden difficult in the paediatric population (10). This was a cross-sectional study which included 82 paediatric contacts (0-18 years) of registered patients for TB treatment in DOTS centre. The results were comparable to a study by Karthik AN et al., in which out of 104 screened contacts 31 (29.8%) contacts were Mantoux positive (11), while in a study by Sharma KR et al., among 190 contacts, only 26 (13.7%) were positive which was less compared to the present study (12).

Out of 23 Mantoux positive contacts 13 had an induration of 10 to 15 mm (57%), nine contacts had induration of >15 mm (39%), while only one contact had a reaction of 10 mm (4%). The mean induration was 14.1 mm. This was similar to study by Singh M et al., out of 95 contacts who tested tuberculin positive, 45% had induration of 10-15 mm, 33% had an induration of 15 to 20 mm and 17% had an induration of >20 mm (13). Out of 23 Mantoux positive contacts 14 (60.89%) were males and 9 (39.13%) were females, while in Mantoux negative contacts 28 (47.54%) were females and 31 (52.54%) were males. This was contrasting to study by Dhoble S et al., where females (60%) contacts were more than males (40%) (14). In the study by Anuradha G et al., also showed contrasting results were female (57.3%) patients were more than males (42.7%) out of 124 contacts (15). This might be due to the reason that, in present study number of male and female contacts were not comparable, infact males were higher in number than females.

In the present study, 32 (39%) contacts were from urban area while 50 (61%) contacts were from rural area. Whereas, in a study by Sarker NR et al., out of 384 contacts most of them belonged to urban area (44.8%), urban slum area (42.2%) and only 13% were from rural area which was contrasting to the present study, where most of the contacts belonged to rural area (16). Out of 23 Mantoux positive contacts, 4 (17.39%) contacts had lymphadenopathy and the results were similar as of the study conducted by Hatwal D et al., wherein, lymph node involvement was the commonest (41.3%), presenting mostly as cervical lymphadenopathy (70.8%) (17). In the present study, among the screened contacts 6 (7.31%) contacts had respiratory system involved, 5 (6.09%) had abdomen involved, 11 (13.4%) had lymphnodes involved. None of the contacts had CNS, skeletal system involved. In a study, conducted by Srivastava G et al., to find tubercular infection in children living with adults receiving DOTS, 29 children had pulmonary TB, 23 children had cervical lymphadenopathy and one child each suffered from tubercular meningitis (<6 years) and abdominal TB (7).

Out of 23 Mantoux positive contacts, 8 (34.8%) contacts had a positive chest radiograph finding. This was in contrast to study by Triasih R et al., for evaluation of chest X-ray in the context of community based screening of child TB contacts out of 265, 19% of contacts having Mantoux positive had a positive chest radiograph finding (18). The difference is statistically significant. Concepcion NDP et al., remarked that although, chest radiography is a screening tool in children suspected of TB, however, it has sensitivity of 39% and specificity of 74% with high intra and interobserver variability. They also derived that a normal chest radiograph can be seen in a case of TB (19). In the present study, out of seven symptomatic Mantoux positive contacts 4 (57.14%) had grandparents as their source case while in asymptomatic Mantoux positive contacts 8 (50%) had parents as their source case. However, among Mantoux negative contacts maximum had parents as source case followed by siblings. But, in a study by Batra S et al., to find childhood TB in household contacts of newly diagnosed TB patients the commonest relationship of source cases to diagnosed children was the mother 51 (42.1%) followed by sister 31 (25.6%), brother 27 (22.3%) and father 18 (14.9%) (20). Nair D et al., found that, household contacts had child 281 (44.2%) followed by spouse 174 (27.6%) and parents 84 (13.2%) and sibling 52 (8.3%) in a study to find household contact screening and yield of TB cases in Chennai, South India (21). In present study, out of all the screened contacts 16 (19.51%) had latent TB and only 1 (2.44%) contact had active TB. Similar finding were seen in a study by Srivastava G et al., in which out of 159 contacts latent TB was detected in 23.4% (n=30) (7). But, in the same study number of active TB were much larger 32 (21.1%). The results were also contrasting to a systematic review and meta-analysis by Fox GJ et al., for contact investigation for TB, in which the prevalence of active TB in all contacts was 3.1% and LTBI was 51.5% which was higher than the present study (22). Also, a study by Ghanaie RM et al., where out of 230 children enrolled, 104 (45.2%) children were identified with LTBI the yield was much higher (23). This might be due to use of masks and improved sanitary habits during the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The higher number of latent TB cases in present study might be because of increased exposure to MTB in India. Due to good coverage by the Bacille Calmette-guerin (BCG) vaccination the volume of active TB is relatively less. However, the children who are immmunocompromised are vulnerable to activation of TB.

The diagnosis of paediatric TB is very challenging because of varied symptomatology, difficulty in laboratory diagnosis, as well as, detection of latent TB cases. A sizable number of children with latent TB are likely to develop active disease subsequently. Identification of LTBI in the household contacts of index adult patients and IPT can go a long way in reducing the burden of paediatric TB. Though, the current national guidelines recommend to offer IPT to household contacts <5 years age after ruling out active TB (3) but, there is a strong case for offering IPT to children and adolescents between 5 to 15 years age also. Education and counselling of patients about child contact tracing and need for initiation and completion of IPT should be highly emphasised.

Limitation(s)

Sample size was not calculated and it was a duration based study. The number of participants should have been more. Follow-up of the contacts was not done.

Conclusion

In the present study, a significant number of children below 15 years of age in contact with TB positive patients were found to have latent TB, and it is possible that, there can be activation from latent to active TB later on in these children. Therefore, to minimise this risk, it is desirable that isoniazid prophylaxis should be given to children upto 15 years age instead of current recommendation to give isoniazid only upto five years of age.

References

1.
Who.int. (cited 2022 May 27). Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/ handle/10665/329368.
2.
Diagnostic Standards and Classification of Tuberculosis in Adults and Children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (Internet). 2000;161(4 Pt 1):1376-95. Available from: http://dx. doi. org/10.1164/ ajrccm.161.4.16141. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Updated Pediatric TB Guidelines 2019- Guidance Document (Internet). Scribd. (cited 2022 May 27). Available from: https://www.scribd.com/document/ 426087947/Updated-Pediatric-TB-Guidelines-2019-Guidance-Document.
4.
Ministry of Health, Family Welfare-Government of India. National strategic plan 2017-2025 for TB elimination in India (Internet). Gov.in. (cited 2022 May 27). Available from: https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&level=2&sublinkid=54 50&lid=3266.
5.
Al-Zamel FA. Detection and diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2009;7(9):1099-108. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Jain A, Lodha R. Management of latent tuberculosis infection in children from developing countries. Indian J Pediatr. 2019;86(8):740-45. Doi: 10.1007/ s12098-019-02861-3. Epub 2019 Feb 11. PMID: 30741387. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Srivastava G, Faridi MMA, Gupta SS. Tubercular infection in children living with adults receiving Directly Observed Treatment Short Course (DOTS): A follow-up study. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):720. Doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05449-x. PMID: 33004004; PMCID: PMC7528466. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Tran TS. Tuberculosis in children: Diagnosis and epidemiology. Open University (United Kingdom); 2016.
9.
Programme GT. Guidance for national tuberculosis programmes on the management of tuberculosis in children (Internet). Who.int. World Health Organization; 2014 (cited 2022 May 27). Available from: https://www.who.int/ publications/i/item/9789241548748.
10.
Kiazyk S, Ball TB. Latent tuberculosis infection: An overview. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2017;43(3-4):62-66. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Karthik AN, Venkataramanan R, Balasubramanian J, Ramasubramaniam P, Balasankar S. Prevalence and risk factors for latent tuberculosis infection among children in contact with smear-positive tuberculosis cases in a tertiary care center, South Tamil Nadu. Int J Sci Study. 2020;8(8):136-41.
12.
Sharma KR, Bhatta NK, Niraula SR, Gurung R, Pokharel PK. A measure of transmission of tuberculosis infection among children in household contact. SAARC Journal of Tuberculosis, Lung Dis HIV/AIDS. 2018;16(1):33-37. [crossref]
13.
Singh M, Mynak ML, Kumar L, Mathew JL, Jindal SK. Prevalence and risk factors for transmission of infection among children in household contact with adults having pulmonary tuberculosis. Arch Dis Child. 2005;90(6):624-28. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Dhoble S, Akre C, Kubde S. Assessment of the socio-demographic profile and treatment outcome of pediatric tuberculosis patients. Nat J Com Med. 2017;8(6):338-42.
15.
Anuradha G, Muraleetharan G. Clinical profile of children with tuberculosis from a semi-urban referral centre in South India: A prospective observational study. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2019;6:1450-55. [crossref]
16.
Sarker NR, Yeasmin T, Saha SK, Adhikary A, Rahman MS, Hossain M. Isoniazid preventive chemotherapy in children contact with adult open pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Med Res Prof. 2019;5(4):201-08.
17.
Hatwal D, Chaudhari S, Joshi AK, Rathaur VK. Patterns of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in children: A hospital based study. Indian J Community Health. 2013;25(1):22-27.
18.
Triasih R, Robertson C, De Campo J, Duke T, Choridah L, Graham SM. An evaluation of chest X-ray in the context of community-based screening of child tuberculosis contacts. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015;19(12):1428-34. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Concepcion ND, Laya BF, Andronikou S, Daltro PA, Sanchez MO, Uy JA, et al. Standardized radiographic interpretation of thoracic tuberculosis in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2017;47(10):1237-48. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Batra S, Ayaz A, Murtaza A, Ahmad S, Hasan R, Pfau R. Childhood tuberculosis in household contacts of newly diagnosed TB patients. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40880. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Nair D, Rajshekhar N, Klinton JS, Watson B, Velayutham B, Tripathy JP, et al. Household contact screening and yield of tuberculosis cases- a clinic based study in Chennai, South India. PloS One. 2016;11(9):e0162090. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Fox GJ, Barry SE, Britton WJ, Marks GB. Contact investigation for tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respi J. 2013;41(1):140-56. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Ghanaie RM, Karimi A, Azimi L, James S, Nasehi M, Mishkar AP, et al. Diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection among pediatric household contacts of Iranian tuberculosis cases using tuberculin skin test, IFN-γ release assay and IFN-γ- induced protein-10. BMC Pediatr. 2021;21(1):01-08.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/60860.17996

Date of Submission: Oct 18, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Dec 16, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Feb 14, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jun 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 20, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jan 11, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Feb 13, 2023 (14%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com