Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 46192

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2023 | Month : June | Volume : 17 | Issue : 6 | Page : ER01 - ER05 Full Version

Aberrant Cytomorphological Features of Primary Plasma Cell Leukaemia: A Case Series


Published: June 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/59121.17999
Prithal Gangadhar, Lovely George, Sandhya Ilanthodi, Purnima S Rao

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, A J Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, A J Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India. 3. Professor, Department of Pathology, A J Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India. 4. Professor, Department of Pathology, A J Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Prithal Gangadhar,
Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, A J Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: drprithalg@ajims.edu.in

Abstract

Primary Plasma Cell Leukaemia (pPCL) is a rare but distinctive sub-type of Plasma Cell Myeloma (PCM) comprising approximately 2-4% of cases of PCM and characterised by short remissions and survivals. Apart from these clinical distinctions, this entity also demonstrates unique cytomorphological features. The authors here attempted to highlight this unusual spectrum of leukaemic plasma cells, posing diagnostic challenges in the blood and bone marrow examinations. The cases presented in this series (48 years old male, 72 years old male,68 years old male and 63 years old female) patients, showed presence of atypical cells in the peripheral smear with few cells portraying the characteristic “hairy cell” morphology, the fourth case in addition, showed small sized plasma cells resembling lymphocytes. Bone marrow biopsy in three cases showed haematopoetic cells replaced by sheets of atypical plasma cells. In addition, the fourth case showed atypical cells having convoluted and notched nuclei giving a differential diagnosis of lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma and small B-cell lymphoma with plasmacytic differentiation. As plasma cell neoplasm was not suspected clinically in all four cases, flow cytometry was sought for confirmation which showed atypical cells expressing CD38 (+), CD138 (+), CD56 (–) with Cykappa (+) in first case, Cylambda (+) in the second case and Cykappa (+) in the fourth case with aberrant expression of cyclin D1 thus confirming a diagnosis of PCL in first two cases and PCM-lymphocytic type with PCL in the fourth case. Immunophenotyping was not performed in the third case due to financial constraints. This case series showcases this mélange of cytomorphological variations of plasma cells ranging from cells masquerading as hairy cells to small sized plasma cells resembling lymphocytes, each posing a unique diagnostic dilemma. This has been rarely discussed in prior published case series. Aberrant morphological features rarely seen in PCL, could lead the pathologist astray from the diagnosis, therefore appropriate use of ancillary tests are essential to arrive at a correct diagnosis.

Keywords

Aberrant morphological features, Cyclin D1 expression, Hairy cell like, Plasma cell myeloma

The PCL is one of the rare variants found in 2-4% cases of PCM (1). The original Kyle’s criteria established in 1974 is based on the presence of more than 20% circulating clonal plasma cells and an absolute count greater than 2×109/L plasma cells in the peripheral blood. However, the consensus definition by the International Myeloma working group in year 2021, is the presence of more than or equal to 5% circulating plasma cells in patients otherwise diagnosed with symptomatic myeloma (2). The quintessential plasma cells in PCL are morphologically mature or of intermediate maturity and do not pose any diagnostic difficulty. On the contrary the atypical/aberrant morphological cases of PCL masquerading as hairy cell leukaemia, B cell lymphoma, acute myeloid leukaemia though rare can be challenging to interpret and thus in such cases the utility of ancillary tests cannot be overstated (3).

Identifying and describing more such cases would be helpful in understanding the nuances of this rare variant and to emphasise the importance of incorporating ancillary tests when appropriate (4),(5),(6). Owing to this rarity, search of published literature revealed a dominance of case reports with only a handful of case series (3),(4),(7),(8),(9). As PCL is known to be an ultra high risk disease, prompt identification of these cases with early treatment is paramount (2). Herein, the authors present this case series of primary PCL with their varied cytomorphological presentation and diagnostic conundrums.

Case Report

The authors reviewed all the cases of pPCL diagnosed in the department of Pathology over a period of 6 years from May 2015 to May 2021. Four such cases were identified. The criteria for the diagnosis were the presence of circulating clonal plasma cells of more than 20% and or absolute count of plasma cells exceeding 2×109/L (5). In each of these cases, clinicopathological details were recorded. Haematological parameters included haemoglobin level, White Blood Cells (WBC) count, Platelet count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR). Serum biochemical analysis included S. Creatinine, urea, calcium, lactate dehydrogenase. Serum Protein Electrophoresis (SPE), S. immunoassay, peripheral smear examination, Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy. Immunohistochemistry analysis and Immunophenotyping by flow cytometry were obtained whenever sought for.

Case 1

A 48-year-old male patient, presented with a history of easy fatigability, and significant weight loss of >10% over the past six months with recent onset of fever, vomiting, abdominal pain, and yellowish discoloration of the skin. There was no significant past medical history. He was afebrile at presentation and had mild hepatosplenomegaly. The patient appeared acutely ill on admission. His initial investigation revealed anaemia {haemoglobin (Hb) 6.8 g/dL}, thrombocytopenia (Platelet count of 75,000/cumm), and leukocytosis (19,370/cumm). Preliminary biochemical evaluation was suggestive of azotemia with serum creatinine of 7.9 mg/dL, blood urea of 195 mg/dL, uric acid of 7.6 mg/dL, and elevated calcium levels of 13.5 mg/dL. Serum electrolytes were normal and liver function tests were normal except for mild elevation in alkaline phosphatase. Routine urine test showed proteinuria (3+). Urine Bence Jones protein was negative.

Ultrasound revealed hepatosplenomegaly with moderate ascitis. However, further investigatons with peripheral smear showed a dimorphic anaemia with thrombocytopenia and leukocytosis with the presence of atypical cells accounted for 28% of the differential count (neutrophils 36%, lymphocytes 29%, eosinophils 04%, monocytes 03% and atypical cells 28%), and absolute count on peripheral smear was 5423 cells/mm3 of Total Leucocyte Count (TLC). The abnormal cells had a characteristic “hairy cell” morphology with central to eccentrically placed nucleus, prominent nucleoli and abundant bluish cytoplasm exhibiting circumferential cytoplasmic projections. The abnormal cells were large, about twice the size of a small lymphocyte. Few cells exhibited cleaved and bilobed nuclei. Occasional typical plasma cells were also noted. The Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) was high- 141 mm/hours. SPE and immunofixation were negative. Free light chain assays were not performed due to financial constraints.

Bony pains were absent, and a skeletal survey was also normal. His renal function further deteriorated on consequent days with creatinine of 8.8 mg/dL, thus requiring haemodialysis. In view of abnormal cells in the peripheral smear bone marrow aspiration was sought which showed a hypercellular marrow with good cellular trails and replacement of the normal marrow elements by sheets of plasma cells (83%), immature plasma cells, and plasmablasts with diminished myeloid, erythroid, and megakaryocytic series. The bone marrow aspiration yield was insufficient for flowcytometry hence peripheral blood was sent for immunophenotyping by flow cytometry. Immunophenotyping showed 27% of atypical cells expressing CD38 (+), CD138 (+), Cykappa (+), and CD56 (–) and serum immunoassay showed an increase in IgE (170 IU/mL). The patient was diagnosed to have pPCL based on the findings of peripheral smear, bone marrow, flow cytometric analysis, and immunoassays. He was treated with melphalan/prednisolone regime along with supportive care. However, the patient did not comply with the treatment and succumbed to the illness within four years.

The peripheral smear finding, bone marrow and flow cytometry findings are depicted in (Table/Fig 1).

Case 2

A 72-year-old male patient presented to the Medicine outpatient department with a clinical history of generalised weakness for one month with recent onset of fever since one week. He reported no significant past medical history. On investigations he was anaemic (Hb: 5.2 g/dL) with leukocytosis 16,700 cells/cumm, and thrombocytopenia (platelet count: 72,000/cumm). On peripheral smear examination, there was rouleax formation of red blood cells with a dimorphic picture, and 8 nucleated Red Blood Cells (RBCs)/100 White Blood Cell (WBC) were noted. Differential count showed neutrophils of 42% with shift to the left upto myelocytes, lymphocytes 28%, eosinophils 4%, and monocytes 6%, with 20% plasma cells and few abnormal cells having centrally placed nucleus with grey-blue cytoplasm. A dimorphic anaemia with a 2leukoerythroblastic blood picture and plasmacytosis (20% plasma cells) (absolute plasma cell count of 3140 cells/cumm) was reported (Table/Fig 2)a,b. Following this Bone marrow examination was performed which revealed hypercellular marrow with replacement of the normal marrow elements by sheets of plasma cells (79%) with markedly diminished haematopoietic precursors (Table/Fig 2)c. Further investigations with SPE showed a thick M band. Ultrasonograph showed mild hepatosplenomegaly. The ESR was high at 154 mm/1 hour. Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) was elevated at 813 IU/l and biochemical parameters including calcium levels were within normal limits. Bone scan was normal. Immunophenotyping by flow cytometry was performed which showed atypical cells expressing CD38, Cylambda, CD20, and negative for CD56. Immunoassays showed an increase in IgA (630 mg/dL). He was treated with melphalan/prednisolone regime along with supportive care. Patient survived for four years with treatment.

The peripheral smear finding, bone marrow findings are depicted in (Table/Fig 2).

Case 3

A 68-year-old male patient, a known case of systemic hypertension since eight years had presented to the medicine outpatient department with the complaints of low back ache since a week with h/o fever since three days. Systemic examination was normal. Routine investigations revealed azotemia with increased levels of creatinine (3.3 mg/dL), urea 92 mg/dL and uric acid 7.4 gm/dL. The calcium levels were also elevated. Rest of the biochemical tests were within normal limits. Complete blood count showed anaemia with the Hb level of 8.4 gm/dL. Platelet and total leukocyte counts were within normal limits. Ultrasonography (USG) revealed Grade 1 prostatomegaly. In view of acute kidney injury, a nephrologist opinion was taken and was treated conservatively with i.v. fluids and i.v. antibiotics. Patient improved symptomatically and was adviced to follow-up. Meanwhile as the patient was anaemic, peripheral smear examination was done which showed dimorphic anaemia with the presence of 20% atypical Plasma cells and plasmablasts (Table/Fig 3)a,b. Blood was sent for SPE which showed the presence of M band. ESR was elevated. Further bone marrow aspiration and biopsy was performed which showed hypercellular marrow with sheets of plasma cells, immature plasma cells and plasmablasts (90%) replacing the haematopoetic elements (Table/Fig 3)c. Bone scan was normal. Immunophenotyping was not sent in this case as peripheral smear, bone marrow cytomorphological features and SPE clearly pointed to the diagnosis of PCL. The patient is on regular follow-up on maintenance therapy and is currently in complete remission.

Case 4

A 63-year-old female patient presented to the Neurology outpatient department with complaints of neck pain and lower limb weakness since one week. Blood investigations showed hypercalcaemia with low levels of vitamin D3, and normal serum parathyroid hormones. Rest of the biochemical parameters were within normal limits. Her chest X-ray and Ultrasonography were normal. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) LS spine showed diffuse posterior bulge of L4-L5 disc. SPE were normal. Routine haematological investigations revealed anaemia (8.2 gm/dL) with normal platelet count and total leucocyte counts.ESR was elevated. Peripheral smear showed 52% small sized plasma cells resembling lymphocytes, immature plasma cells, plasmablasts, and abnormal cells with hair like projections bone marrow aspiration and biopsy were performed which shows 80% atypical cells with round to irregular convoluted and notched nuclei, open chromatin, few with nucleoli, scant to moderate amount of basophilic cytoplasm. Many had fine cytoplasmic vacuolations. Some had plasmacytoid appearance with admixed small lymphocytes and binucleate cells. The peripheral smear and bone marrow morphology is depicted in (Table/Fig 4). Patient was diagnosed to have PCL one and a half years ago and has discontinued the treatment after two months due to financial constraints.

A differential diagnosis of PCL, Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma and small B cell lymphoma with plasmacytic differentiation were offered and flow cytometry was suggested. As bone marrow aspiration yield was insufficient for flowcytometry, Immunohistochemistry was performed on the bone marrow biopsy. The atypical cells expressed CD138, Kappa (light restriction), CD56 and cyclin D1 rendering a diagnosis of PCM- lymphocytic type with PCL.

pPCL accounted for 3.8% (4/105) cases of PCM with the mean age of 64 years. A 75% (3/4 cases) of the patients were males. Patients had varied symptoms- easy fatiguability, generalised weekness, fever, weight loss, nausea, vomiting, low back ache and abdominal distension. A 50% (2/4) of the cases showed hepatosplenomegaly. All the cases (100%, 4/4 cases) presented with anaemia and elevated ESR, 50% cases (2/4 cases) had leukocytosis and thrombocytopenia.

The demographic data, clinical features, provisional diagnosis, radiological and laboratory findings including the CRAB features (Creatinine, Renal derangements, Anaemia, Bone lytic lesions) along with SPE, S.Immunoassay whenever available are presented in (Table/Fig 5). (Table/Fig 6) shows the spectrum of cytomorphological features of circulating plasma cells in peripheral smears, bone marrow aspiration and biopsy findings, immunophenotyping by flowcytometry and IHC findings.

Discussion

The PCL is a rare and clinically aggressive variant of PCM (5),(6). In this case series, the authors highlight the cytomorphological variations of PCL which are not adequately discussed in literature. The leukaemic plasma cells are barely recognisable as plasma cells in these cases, imparting a diagnostic challenge to the pathologist. In the present case series, pPCL accounted for 3.8% (4/105) cases of PCM over the period of six years, with the mean age of 64 years. The incidence found in the present case series is lower than the incidence found in case series by Kar R et al., 5.6% (5 in 89 cases over 5 years) (7). The age of the patients ranged from 48 to 72 years and there were three male and one female patient. Male: female ratio is 3:1. The youngest patient in this series was 48 years, although there are Indian reports of pPCL at even younger age of presentation at 21 years (7).

In the conventional cases of PCL, the morphology of plasma cells in the peripheral blood range from mature forms to immature blastic forms (8). All these features are easily recognisable and diagnosis is usually straight forward. But unusual findings like “hairy cells” (9) in the peripheral smear seen in two of the cases discussed here, posed diagnostic difficulty to conclude it as PCL in PBS, in the absence of which would suffice to call as PCL in PBS. But Bone marrow in these cases was straight forward and showed replacement of the normal marrow elements by sheets of plasma cells. Immunophenotyping by flowcytometry also helped us as it showed 27% of atypical cells in 1st case and 20% in 2nd case expressing CD38 (+), CD138 (+), Cykappa (+) in 1st case and Cylambda in 2nd case with CD56 and B-cell lineage negativity in both the cases. These unusual cytomorphological features were also seen in a case series by Kar R et al., Rajeswari G et al., and another study by Kumar TN et al., where the plasma cells were masquerading as hairy cells (7),(8),(10). However, these cells were negative for tartarate-resistant acid phosphatase stain, B lineage, and hairy cell markers and positive for plasma cell markers CD38 and CD138. The 3rd case showed 20% atypical plasma cells within the peripheral smear with replacement of the normal marrow elements by sheets of plasma cells also seen by Rastogi P et al., (11). Flow cytometry was not sought in this case as it fulfilled the definition of PCL.

The 4th case showed 52% small sized plasma cells resembling lymphocytes, immature plasma cells, Plasmablasts, abnormal cells with hair like projections and suggested the possibility of PCL but the bone marrow showed 80% atypical cells with round to irregular convoluted and notched nuclei, open chromatin, few with nucleoli, scant to moderate amount of basophilic cytoplasm. Many had fine cytoplasmic vacuolations. Some had plasmacytoid appearance with admixed small lymphocytes and binucleate cells.

This case posed a diagnostic difficulty owing to the presence of small sized plasma cells giving a lymphoid appearance with bone marrow showing atypical cells displaying convolutions and notched nuclei which are unusual findings in a conventional PCL (1). Flow cytometry was sought in this case to rule out lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma and small B cell lymphoma with plasmacytic differentiation but was not performed due to insufficient material. Hence, Immunohistochemistry was performed on the biopsy which showed atypical cells expressing CD138, Kappa (light restriction), CD56 and cyclin D1 rendering a diagnosis of PCM-lymphocytic type with PCL. It is a rare variant accounting for 3% of myelomas with high frequency of Cyclin D1 expression as seen in the presently discussed case. Small lymphocyte type of myeloma is a potential mimicker of mature B cell lymphoma (12),(13),(14). Thus, cognizance about the unusual cytomorphological findings in PCL will help the pathologists to avoid misdiagnosis as they have a striking similarity between mature B cell lymphoma and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma. The small lymphocyte– like PCM is distinguished from mature B cell lymphoma by the absence of CD 45 expression and the presence of CD 38 and CD 138 (12),(13).

A study done by McKenney AH et al., showed 12 cases of Small Lymphocyte like plasma cells out of 351 PCM with morphologically similar appearing small cells as seen in the present case (12). IHC showed lack of CD45 with CD138+, CD38+, MUM1+Lambda chain restriction. Most cases share hyperexpression of cyclin D1 or cyclin D3 genes. Sharma P et al., also reported a case of small lymphocytic type of PCM in a 68-year-old patient and concluded that plasma cells are notorious for their varied cytomorphology and awareness about this morphological masquerader is essential to avoid misdiagnosis (15). These cases also showed high frequency of CD20 expression and Cyclin D translocation as seen in the present case (16). (Table/Fig 7) depicts published case reports on PCL (8),(10),(12),(17),(18).

Conclusion

Aberrant morphological features rarely seen in PCL, falsely conveys an element of doubt about the diagnosis which needs to be meticulously dealt with ancillary tests like IHC and flow cytometry to arrive at a correct diagnosis.

References

1.
Jung SH, Lee JJ. Update on primary plasma cell leukaemia. Blood Res. 2022;57(S1):62-66. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Fernández de Larrea C, Kyle R, Rosiñol L, Paiva B, Engelhardt M, Usmani S, et al. Primary plasma cell leukaemia: Consensus definition by the International Myeloma Working Group according to peripheral blood plasma cell percentage. Blood Cancer J. 2021;11(12):192. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Majumdar N, Kumar R, Anand M, Kalita D, Ghara N, Chopra A, et al. Plasma cell leukaemia--a study of 28 cases from India. Hematology. 2009;14(4):198-203. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Menon AM, Ali N. Plasma cell Leukaemia mimicking hairy cell leukaemia: Extended role of Immunophenotyping in correct diagnosis. J Appl Hematol. 2019;10(3):108-09. [crossref]
5.
Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H, et al., editors. WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. 4th ed. [Accessed: Apr 2018].
6.
Jelinek T, Kryukov F, Rihova L, Hajek R. Plasma cell leukaemia: From biology to treatment. Eur J Haematol. 2015;95(1):16-26. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Kar R, Priyadarshini SG, Niraimathi M, Basu D, Badhe BA. Clinico-pathological spectrum of primary plasma cell leukaemia diagnosed at a tertiary care centre in South India over 5-year period. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2012;28(3):170-74. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Rajeswari G, Paul TR, Uppin MS, Uppin SG, Rao DR, Raju DD, et al. Plasma cell leukaemia: A case series from south India with emphasis on rarer variants. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2014;35(3):211-14. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Singh S, Rath A, Yadav S. Primary Plasma Cell Leukaemia: Case report and review of the literature. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2018;18(3):e397-e401. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Kumar TN, Krishnamani K, Gandhi LV, Sadhashivudu G, Rao R. Plasma cell leukaemia masquerading as hairy cell leukaemia: A case report. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2014;30:33-35. Doi: 10.1007/s12288-013-0228-5. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Rastogi P, Ahluwalia J, Parathan KK, Malhotra P. Plasma cell leukaemia presenting with hyperleukocytosis and anaplasia. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2017;33(1):128-29. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Heerema-McKenney A, Waldron J, Hughes S, Zhan F, Sawyer J, Barlogie B, et al. Clinical, immunophenotypic, and genetic characterisation of small lymphocyte-like plasma cell myeloma: A potential mimic of mature B-cell lymphoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;133(2):265-70. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Eveillard M, Moreau P. Atypical plasma cell leukaemia mistaken for lymphocytosis on blood count. Blood. 2015;126(16):1965. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Fernández de Larrea C, Kyle RA, Durie BG, Ludwig H, Usmani S, Vesole DH, et al. Plasma cell leukaemia: Consensus statement on diagnostic requirements, response criteria and treatment recommendations by the International Myeloma Working Group. Leukaemia. 2013;27(4):780-91. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Sharma P, Sreedharanunni S, Sachdeva MUS, Malhotra P. Morphology can be misleading: Small lymphocyte-like plasma cell myeloma. BMJ Case Reports CP. 2019;12(10):e232674. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Dadu T, Rangan A, Handoo A, Bhargava M. Primary non-secretory plasma cell leukaemia with atypical morphology– A case report. I ndian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2009;25(2):81-83. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Shibushawa M. Plasma cell leukaemia presenting as flower shaped plasma cells mimicking adult T cell leukaemia or lymphoma. The Lancet Hematology. 2020;7(3):e270. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Toriyama E, Imaizumi Y, Tsuruda K, Itonaga H, Sato S, Ando K, et al. Oligosecretory primary plasma cell leukaemia with atypical morphological abnormality. Intern Med. 2019;58(15):2213-17.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/59121.59121

Date of Submission: Aug 02, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Oct 15, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jan 03, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jun 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 08, 2022
• Manual Googling: Dec 05, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Dec 29, 2022 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com