Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 44519

AbstractMaterial and MethodsReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Research Protocol
Year : 2023 | Month : June | Volume : 17 | Issue : 6 | Page : EK01 - EK04 Full Version

Utility of COX-2 as Immunohistochemical Prognostic Marker in Relation to Various Histopathological Parameters and TNM Staging in Colorectal Carcinoma


Published: June 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/60532.18032
Sreetama Mukherjee, Sunita Vagha, Samarth Shukla, Anup Kediya, Suvidha S Tammewar

1. First Year Junior Resident, Department of Pathology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Pathology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 3. Professor, Department of Pathology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 5. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Sunita Vagha,
Professor and Head, Department of Pathology, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: sreetama45@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The most prevalent neoplasm of the gastrointestinal system is colorectal carcinoma. After lung and breast carcinoma, malignant colorectal cancer appears to be characterised by inflammation. Among the numerous recognised indicators of inflammation, Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) has been identified as playing a key role in the early phases of carcinogenesis.

Need of the study: The link between higher expression of COX-2 and the early stages of carcinogenesis and cancer development implies that COX-2 might be a target for precancerous colorectal lesion imaging. The present study can be useful in assessment of expression of COX2 in colorectal cancer and it’s correlation with the histopathological grade, nodal status and TNM staging.

Aim: To assess the expression of COX-2 in colorectal carcinoma and the association with various histopathological parameters and Tumour Node Metastasis (TNM) staging.

Materials and Methods: The current study is an observational, cross-sectional, retrospective, and prospective study that will take place in the Histopathology and Immunohistochemistry unit of the Department of Pathology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. Sample collection will be done during the the period of August 2021 to July 2024. The study included approximately 60-65 resected specimens from confirmed and planned Colectomy, Hemicolectomy, and Proctocolectomy specimens received in the Department of General Pathology, JNMC. Observations and results will be collected from the immunohistochemistry study by using COX-2 as a prognostic marker in colorectal carcinoma and correlating it with the TNM staging. Statistical analysis will be made by Chi-square test and regression analysis.

Keywords

Cyclooxygenase 2, Colectomy specimens, Tumour node metastasis staging

The most prevalent neoplasm of the gastrointestinal system is colorectal carcinoma. After lung and breast carcinoma, it is the world’s third most common cancer and the second leading cause of death (1). It contributes to ten percent of worldwide cancer incidence and deaths. Epidemiological studies show colorectal cancer contributes to an estimated 1.9 million incidence cases and 0.9 million mortalities globally in 2020 (1). In comparison to Western countries, the incidence rate is low in India. The incidence of colorectal carcinoma is relatively less among the younger population (<30 years) than in the elderly population. The majority of Indian research determined that the typical age of incidence for this tumour is 45-84 years old, with a male predominance.

Risk factors for colorectal carcinoma can be classified as genetic and environmental or lifestyle-related factors. Colonic polyposis syndromes, Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) and its variations (Turcot, Gardener, and attenuated FAP), and non polyposis syndromes are inherited illnesses that lead to colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) (2). Environmental risk factors include modifiable and non modifiable variables. Lack of physical exercise, low fibre-high fat diet, alcohol drinking and tobacco use are all controllable risk factors. Non modifiable risk factors include age, gender, and ethnicity. African, Americans population at an increased risk of developing colon cancer than other races, colorectal carcinoma is more common in people who have Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis (3).

Variety of symptoms, including changes in bowel habits, discomfort, tenesmus, as well as rectal bleeding and surgical emergencies including intestinal obstruction (2). The clinical symptoms may vary based on the tumour location and tumour staging. Unfortunately, colorectal tumours grow slowly and may go unnoticed for lengthy periods of time (2).

Colorectal carcinoma can be assessed by using various investigations which include complete blood count, liver function test, imaging technique such as X-ray, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, PET scan) (3), diagnostic colonoscopy, proctoscopy, biopsy and evaluation of tumour markers on immunohistochemistry (3).

The prognosis of colorectal adenocarcinomas is related to clinical and pathological parameters such as age, sex, tumour size, the local extent of the tumour, tumour edge, tumour margin, tumour thickness, lymph node involvement and the most important is tumour stage (2). Prognosis of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer primarily on the stage defined by the TNM, the American Joint Committee on Cancer Classifications, and the CAP guidelines (4).

Immunohistochemistry is the technique of using the antigen-antibody interaction to identify particular antigens on cells. It involves the process of selective identification of antigens, Antibodies that bind selectively to antigens in biological tissues are used to detect a protein in the cells of a piece of tissue (5).

The COX isoenzymes also known as prostaglandin (PG) rate-limiting synthases catalyse the metabolism of Arachidonic Acid (AA) to PG H2 (6). Other PGs and thromboxanes are formed from it. Finally thromboxane A2 (TXA2) and physiologically active PGs (PGD2, PGE2, PGF2, and PGI2) are formed (6). These regulatory chemicals are important in a series of biological processes which include cell proliferation, angiogenesis, immunological function, and inflammation, all of which are important in the formation and progression of cancers (5).

Malignant colorectal cancer appears to be characterised by inflammation. COX-2 has been identified as playing a key role in the early phases of carcinogenesis. The link between higher expression of COX-2 and the early stages of carcinogenesis and cancer development implies that COX-2 might be a target for precancerous colorectal lesion imaging. As a result, the current study is to assess the expression of COX-2 in colorectal cancer and correlate it with the histopathological grade, nodal status, and TNM staging.

Hence, this research protocol is planned to assess expression of COX-2 in colorectal carcinoma in relation with histopathological parameters and TNM staging. The objective of this study is to confirm and diagnose colorectal carcinoma by histopathological examination and to determine histological grades based on COX-2 as a prognostic markers; The authors will also determine the staging of colorectal carcinoma by TNM classification based on eighth American Joint Committee of Cancer (AJCC). The authors will assess COX-2 expression in tumour tissues of colon and rectum by immunohistochemistry. The research protocol will compare the relation between COX-2 expression with the histopathological parameters, histological grade and pathological TNM staging.

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Colorectal carcinoma is the world’s third-highest cause of cancer-related deaths in both genders, with an anticipated 515,637 male fatalities and 419,536 female deaths in 2020 (1). The most abundant prostanoid present in colorectal tissue is COX-2 produced from PGE2. The COX-2 expression is either low or non existent in the typical colonic mucosa. In the normal mucosa, macrophages, vascular endothelial cells, and neuroendocrine cells produce low amounts of COX-2 (5). However, it is an early response gene that is rapidly activated by growth factors, cytokines, oncogenes, and phorbol ester. The COX-2 promoter region has multiple transcription factor binding sites, including nuclear factor Kb, nuclear factor of Interleukin (IL)-6, AMP (Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate), and Hypoxia-Inducible Factors (HIF-1). All of which upregulate COX-2. COX-2 has been linked to cancers of the colon, breast, bladder, oesophagus, and prostate, as well as precancerous and malignant lesions (5). COX-2 contributes towards carcinogenesis by: i) Evasion of apoptosis; ii) Providing self-sufficiency of growth signals; iii) Decreasing the sensitivity to antigrowth signals; iv) Providing boundless potential to replicate; v) Supporting angiogenesis; vi) Progression of the tumour by promoting invasion and metastasis. Avoidance of the antitumour immune response. COX-2 is implicated in carcinogen activation and apoptosis suppression, replicative potential, angiogenic factor generation, and metastatic potential enhancement (5).

Steinbach G et al., studied the effects of Celecoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, which has been shown to have beneficial effects on patients with FAP (7). According to many studies, such patients have a one-hundred percent chance of developing colorectal cancer. In this placebo-controlled research, Colorexib was given to a group of patients and the effect it had on them was monitored for six months. According to the findings of this study, regular ingestion of colorexib can lessen the occurrence of colorectal polyps.

Sano H et al., conducted an immunohistochemical analysis to show the exaggerated appearance of COX-2 in colon tissues with cancer (8). This study intended to examine the role of Non Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) in reducing the risk of colorectal cancer. The major observations are as follows:

• Immunoreactive COX-2 was found in the mucosal epithelial cells, mucosal and mononuclear cells, Auer Bach’s myenteric plexus, vascular endothelial cells, and smooth muscle cells of the inner circular and external longitudinal layers.
• In cancer cells, the extent and intensity of the immunoreactive COX-2 were greater than that of mucosal epithelial cells, inflammatory mononuclear cells, and fibroblasts in colorectal cancer tissues.
• These findings suggest that COX-2 may have a role in the genesis, progression, and maintenance of colorectal malignancies when activated by chemical compounds, cytokines, and growth factors.
The function of COX in endothelial cell migration and angiogenesis has been studied by Fujita T et al., (9). The researchers developed in-vitro model systems in which endothelial cells and colorectal carcinoma cells were co-cultured. COX-2 overexpression causes cells to create PGs, which encourage endothelial migration and tube formation, whereas control cells used by the researchers showed limited activity. Various angiogenic factors, along with NS-398 (a form of COX-2 inhibitor) and aspirin can inhibit this effect by antibodies. Based on the observations from in-vitro analysis, the team concluded that:
• Cells, where COX-2 is overexpressed, would show better growth as compared to Caco-2 cells.
• Both indomethacin and NS-398 significantly reduced the growth of tumours.

Additionally, a selective COX-2 inhibitor has little effect on the growth of HCT-116 xenografts, whereas a non selective COX-2 inhibitor causes cancer cells to release angiogenic factors. Kasper HU et al., an immunohistochemical assessment of COX-2 expression in colorectal carcinoma and liver metastases in 57 persons indicated that COX-2 is consistently engaged in the manifestation of metastatic colorectal cancer (10). The findings of the study indicated that COX-2 inhibitors may have anticancer effects through changing signalling pathways linked to cell sensitivity and death.

Al-Maghrabi J according to the study, COX-2 expression was associated to lymph node involvement and distant metastases in 56 percent of patients with colorectal cancer, over expression of COX-2 was also linked to a greater likelihood of tumour recurrence in the study, implying that expression of COX-2 can provide necessary prognostic information in colorectal carcinoma and could be used to screen patients at high risk of recurrence (11). COX-2-negative patients exhibited a much longer survival time than COX-2-positive patients, indicating that Cyclooxygenase 2 expression is associated to a poor prognosis.

The TNM classification (Tumour/Lymph Node/Metastasis) was devised by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (4) and is the most extensively used clinical staging method for categorising colorectal carcinoma. This method is primarily used for classifying the severity of cancer and helps to assess the various cancer staging. It primarily assesses (T) tumour, regional lymph nodes (N), and distant metastasis (M). Implementing a standard classification system such as TNM helps in knowledge sharing and research efficiently (4).

Material and Methods

The planned research protocol will result in cross-sectional, retrospective and prospective study that will take place in the Histopathology and Immunohistochemistry unit of the Department of Pathology, between the years of 2022 and 2024. The approval for the research protocol has been taken from University’s Institutional Ethical Committee (DMIMS (DU)/IEC/2022/105).

Sample size calculation: Sample size calculation for study on estimating a population prevalence has been described by Daniel ET in study by Charan J and Biswas T:

n=Z2p.(1-p)/d2

In this formula (12), ‘n’ is the sample size, ‘Z’ is the statistic denoting the level of confidence (significance level of 5% i.e., confidence interval of 95%=1.96), ‘P’ denotes the expected prevalence of colorectal carcinoma (18%) and ‘d’ is the desired level of error in margin (7%). The sample size (n) is derived to be 63.85 (using above factors).Thus, nearly 60-65 patients will be needed in this study group.

Inclusion criteria: Patients diagnosed with Colorectal Carcinoma (primary cases arising denovo, without any history of previous treatment) and cases of Colectomy/Hemicolectomy/Proctocolectomy resection specimens are planned to be involved in the study.

Exclusion criteria: All inflammatory lesions and other malignancies of the gastrointestinal tract, biopsy specimens and all treated cases of colorectal carcinoma and cases with recurrence will be excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

The study will include approximately 60-65 resected specimens from confirmed and planned colectomy, Hemicolectomy, Proctocolectomy specimens received in the Department of Pathology.

Staining protocol: Haematoxylin and eosin staining (13): The positive tissue control considered will be a piece of lung adenocarcinoma tissue. Colon cancer tissue sections will be deparaffinised by immersing into three sets of xylene for ten minutes each. It will be followed by three sets of absolute ethanol and finally rinsed with tap water for dewaxing of the sections. Post this, alcohol in descending grades will be used to rehydrate the prepared sections which will then be exposed to water. The slides will then be placed into Harris Haematoxylin for ten minutes and then rinsed thoroughly in running tap water for approximately 4-5 minutes. The sections will be exposed to one percent Hydrochloric (HCL) acid in 70% alcohol to remove excess Haematoxylin followed by wash with alkaline tap water for five minutes. The slides will be then stained in Eosin (1 percent aqueous) for one minute. The sections will then be dehydrated by washing with absolute alcohol (90 percent), before being mounted in Dibutylphthalate Polystyrene Xylene (DPX).

Approach to the study: Patients who are enrolled in the trial will be asked to give their prior informed permission so that specimen from clinically suspicious cases would be obtained and forwarded to the Department of Pathology for histopathological analysis. In this study, we will collect colectomy/Hemicolectomy/Proctolectomy specimens which will be preserved in 10 percent formalin in the Department of Pathology, for histopathological examination. We will perform gross inspection and dissection of this surgical specimen then we will take the sections from the margins, tumour mass, and lymph nodes. After that we will perform regular tissue processing followed by Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining. Then we will assess the tumour’s histological grade by categorising on the basis of the College of American Pathologists (CAP) (4) standards. We will analyse tumour’s stage by TNM staging based on 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer, (AJCC) (4).

Immunohistochemical staining for COX-2 (6): The segment will be cut at nearly four micrometres, then it has to be floated on Poly-L Lysine coated slides, and then incubated at thirty seven degrees celsius for duration of one day and then it has to be shifted to fifty eight degrees celsius overnight. Deparaffinisation will be accomplished in two changes of Xylene for fifteen minutes each, followed by dexylinisation in two changes of pure alcohol. De-alcoholisation will be done for one minute with ninety percent and seventy percent alcohol, respectively. Rehydrate for ten min in tap water and then for five minutes in water processed by distillation. Retrieval of antigen will be accomplished after ten minutes of pressure cooking in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) and then soaking the pressure cooker in water for twenty minutes in the sink. After that, the slides will be washed for five minutes in distilled water.

For five minutes, the slides will be immersed in Tris-Buffer Solution (TBS) (pH 7.6). Peroxide block will be applied for 10-15 minutes. The slides will then be washed three times in TBS buffer, each time for five minutes. A fifteen-minute power block will be used to prevent non specific reactions with the other tissue antigen The slides will be drained, and the sections will be coated with the appropriate primary antibody for an hour to identify tumour markers using an antigen-antibody response. The slides will then be washed three times in TBS for five minutes each time to remove any unbound antibodies. A final super-enhancer will be added and allowed for thirty minutes to improve the response between the primary and secondary antibodies. The unbound antibodies will be removed by washing under TBS buffer. The surplus stain will be rinsed in tap water for five minutes after Counter staining using a haematoxylin stain for one minute. The slide was then air-dried, xylene cleaned, and DPX mounted.

The positive control will be a piece of lung adenocarcinoma, while the negative control will be the same tissue treated without secondary antibody 70. 3’3’ diaminobenzidine will be the chromogen in the colour development solution (DAB).

Methodology of interpretation (5): The extent of staining and the intensity of staining will be added together for a total score expression of COX-2 will be scored as per the criteria shown in (Table/Fig 1),(Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3).

Interpretation based on histologic grade according to College of American Pathologists guidelines (CAP) (4): The criteria for grading considered in the present study is as follows:

• Grade I- Well-distinguished
• Grade II- Differentiated to a moderate extent
• Grade III- Insufficiently differentiated
• Grade IV- Undifferentiated

Despite high interobserver heterogeneity, multivariate analysis has repeatedly demonstrated that histologic grade is a stage-independent predictive predictor. High tumour grade, in particular, has been shown to be an unfavourable prognostic factor. The number of grades has been compacted in the bulk of research reporting the prognostic value of tumour grade to establish a two-tiered stratification for data analysis as follows:

• Low-grade: Well-differentiated and moderately differentiated
• High-grade: Poorly differentiated and undifferentiated The classification of low-grade tumours as well-differentiated or moderately differentiated has been the most significant grading discrepancy faced, whereas interobserver variability in recognising high-grade carcinoma is modest. A two-tiered grading system for colorectal cancer (low-grade and highgrade) is suggested due to its shown predictive efficacy, relative simplicity, and consistency. The following are the criteria for grading only on gland development.
Low-grade=Low-grade gland formation is defined as more than or equal to fifty percent gland formation.
High-grade=Less than fifty percent gland development is considered high-grades.

Observations and results will be collected and combined together over the period of three years and will be analysed statistically.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis will be made by Chi-square test (Software Used: Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27.0) to determine the association between COX-2 expression and histopathological features. Multiple linear regression analysis is performed to determine the relative elements that contribute to metastasis. A p-value of <0.05 is considered to indicate significance.

References

1.
Morgan E, Arnold M, Gini A, Lorenzoni V, Cabasag CJ, Laversanne M, et al. Global burden of colorectal cancer in 2020 and 2040: Incidence and mortality estimates from Globocan. Gut. 2023;72(2):338-44. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Kumar V, Abbas AK, Aster JC, Turner JR, Perkins JA. Robbins & COTRAN pathologic basis of disease. 10th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2021.
3.
Sirohi B, Shrikhande SV, Perakath B, Raghunandharao D, Julka PK, Lele V, et al. Indian Council of Medical Research Consensus Document for the management of colorectal cancer. Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology. 2014;35(03):192-96. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Amin MB. AJCC cancer staging manual. 8 th ed. New York: Springer; 2017.
5.
Kim SH, Ahn BK, Paik SS, Lee KH. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression is a predictive marker for late recurrence in colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology Research and Practice. 2018;2018:7968149. Doi: 10.1155/2018/7968149. eCollection 2018. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Dagallier C, Avry F, Touchefeu Y, Buron F, Routier S, Chérel M, et al. Development of PET radioligands targeting COX-2 for colorectal cancer staging, a review of in vitro and preclinical imaging studies. Frontiers in Medicine. 2021;8:675209. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.675209. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Steinbach G, Lynch PM, Phillips RK, Wallace MH, Hawk E, Gordon GB, et al. The effect of celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, in familial adenomatous polyposis. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(26):1946-52. Doi: 10.1056/ NEJM200006293422603. PMID: 10874062. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Sano H, Kawahito Y, Wilder RL, Hashiramoto A, Mukai S, Asai K, et al. Expression of cyclooxygenase-1 and-2 in human colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 1995;55(17):3785-89. PMID: 7641194.
9.
Fujita T, Matsui M, Takaku K, Uetake H, Ichikawa W, Taketo MM, et al. Size- and invasion-dependent increase in cyclooxygenase 2 levels in human colorectal carcinomas. Cancer Res. 1998;58(21):4823-26. PMID: 9809985.
10.
Kasper HU, Konze E, Dienes HP, Stippel DL, Schirmacher P, Kern M. COX-2 expression and effects of COX-2 inhibition in colorectal carcinomas and their liver metastases. Anticancer Res. 2010;30(6):2017-23. PMID: 20651346.
11.
Al-Maghrabi J. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression as a predictor of outcome in colorectal carcinoma. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2012;18(15):1793. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research? Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine. 2013;35(2):121-26. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Bancroft JD, Lyton C, Suvarna KS. Theory and practice of histological techniques. 5th ed. Sl.: Elsevier; 2012.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/60532.18032

Date of Submission: Oct 07, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Nov 22, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jan 30, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jun 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 08, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jan 02, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jan 17, 2023 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com