Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 141113

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : April | Volume : 17 | Issue : 4 | Page : TC09 - TC13 Full Version

Prevalence of Deep Vein Thrombosis among COVID-19 Patients using Colour Doppler Ultrasound in a Tertiary Care Centre of Central India: A Prospective Cohort Study


Published: April 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/62477.17756
Amit Shankhwar, Alka Agrawal, Aksha Tanwani, Vasudev Lodhi

1. Associate Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, MGM Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Radiodiagnosis, MGM Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India. 3. Postgraduate Resident, Department of Radiodiagnosis, MGM Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India. 4. Postgraduate Resident, Department of Radiodiagnosis, MGM Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Aksha Tanwani,
Postgraduate Resident, Department of Radiodiagnosis, MGM Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
E-mail: akshatanwani@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Acute respiratory disease, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious and potentially fatal respiratory disease. Increase in the inflammatory response, hypoxia, immobilisation are suggested mechanisms of procoagulant state. Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary emboli are common and often silent. Venous duplex ultrasound help in determination of the presence, extent, age of the thrombus and its attachment to venous wall.

Aim: To evaluate the prevalence of DVT by colour doppler ultrasound in lower limbs of mild to severe clinical categories of COVID-19 patients.

Materials and Methods: A time-bound, hospital-based prospective cohort study was conducted in the Department of Radiodiagnosis, MY Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India, between March 2021 and February 2022. Study comprised 2200 cases of COVID-19 positive patients with elevated D-dimer levels i.e., >0.5 ng/mL and colour doppler imaging for lower limb. The clinical (co-morbidities, clinical severity) and radiological data (compressibility, colour flow) were studied and analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 25.0.

Results: In the present study, there were 1144 (52%) males and 1056 (48%) females. Out of 2200 patients, 792 (36%) patients showed presence of DVT. The most prevalent age group was 36-55 years having 506 (63.9%) patients. Majority of DVT positive patients were suffering with hypertension and diabetes i.e., 261 (33%) and 372 (47%) patients, respectively. Most commonly affected vein in DVT was Common Femoral Vein (CFV) in 704 (88.9%) patients. Superficial veins thrombosis was also associated with DVT affecting Short Saphenous Vein (SSV) in 439 (55.4%) patients and Great Saphenous Vein (GSV) in 221 (27.9%) patients.

Conclusion: There was a high prevalence of DVT among COVID-19 positive patients. Colour doppler ultrasound has provided an excellent aid in the diagnosis of DVT.

Keywords

Coronavirus disease 2019, Femoral vein, Pulmonary emboli, Ultrasonography

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), an infectious and potentially fatal acute respiratory disease caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus and was the cause of the worldwide pandemic. It causes an increase in inflammation, hypoxia, immobilisation, and disseminated intravascular coagulation, which is suggested mechanisms for a procoagulant state leading to microthrombosis, and angiogenesis (1). The triggers of venous thrombosis are frequently multifactorial, with the different parts of the triad of Virchow i.e., damage to the vessel wall, blood flow turbulence, and hypercoagulability contributing in varying degrees in each patient, but all result in early thrombus interaction with the endothelium (2). As blood flow slows, oxygen tension declines with a coincident increase in haematocrit (3). The hypercoagulable microenvironment that ensues may downregulate certain antithrombotic proteins that are preferentially expressed on venous valves including thrombomodulin and Endothelial Protein C Receptor (EPCR) (4). In addition to reducing important anticoagulant proteins, hypoxia drives the expression of certain procoagulants. Among these is P-selectin, an adhesion molecule which attracts immunologic cells containing tissue factor to the endothelium (5),(6). It is part of the venous thromboembolic disorders which represent the third most common cause of death (7). Severe COVID-19 patients are found to have the consistent haemostatic abnormalities like mild thrombocytopenia and increased D-dimer level, which together with the higher rate of mortality, indicate some form of underlying coagulopathy (8). Therefore, severe COVID-19 positive patients are more prone for venous thromboembolic events and the same was perceived by clinicians on the field.

Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary emboli are common and often silent and thus go undiagnosed, therefore the incidence and prevalence is often underestimated. Morbidity can be reduced only through early diagnosis and treatment. Venous duplex ultrasound examination not only helps in determination of the presence of a thrombus but also evaluation of the extent of the thrombus (particularly its upper limit), its age (of prognostic interest), and its attachment to the venous wall (partially or totally occlusive thrombus, attached or free floating thrombus (9). The primary diagnostic US criteria for acute DVT remains non compressibility of the vein with secondary diagnostic criteria being echogenic thrombus within the vein lumen, venous distention, complete absence of spectral or colour Doppler signal within the vein lumen, loss of flow phasicity, and loss of response to valsalva or augmentation (10). US can also be used to differentiate acute from chronic thrombus. In acute thrombosis, vein is distended by hypoechoic thrombus and shows partial or no compressibility without collaterals. In chronic thrombosis, the vein is incompressible, narrow and irregular and shows echogenic thrombus attached to the venous walls with development of collaterals.

Advantages of lower extremity venous duplex US are that it is readily available, quick, cost-effective, non invasive, devoid of ionising radiation, lacks need for intravenous contrast and can be portable for critically ill patients prone for developing DVT. The present study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of DVT in lower limbs of COVID-19 patients with high levels of D-dimer by colour doppler ultrasound.

Material and Methods

A time-bound, hospital-based prospective cohort study was conducted in the Department of Radiodiagnosis, MY Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India from March 2021 to February 2022. Institutional Scientific and Ethical Committee approval was obtained (EC/MGM/June-21/21).

Inclusion criteria: Clinically mild to severe COVID-19 positive patient diagnosis made by Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR), patients with elevated D-dimer level >0.5 ng/mL by fragment D-dimer test, patients of age between 18 years and 90 years and patients who gave informed consent were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients having history of DVT of lower limbs, pregnant females and patients receiving therapeutic dose of anticoagulants for DVT were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

Mild category included patients with various COVID-19 symptoms but no dyspnea or abnormal chest imaging, Moderate category included patients with abnormal chest imaging but SpO2 >94% on room air and severe category included patients with SpO2 <94% on room air and respiratory rate >30/min or respiratory failure or multiorgan dysfunction (11).

Lower extremity venous duplex US combines two components to assess for DVT i.e., B-mode or gray-scale imaging with transducer compression maneuvers and Doppler evaluation consisting of colour flow doppler imaging.

The patient was appropriately positioned and gel was applied to the groin. A high frequency linear-array transducer (7-13 MHz) that provides adequate penetration and high resolution image was used and scanning was done both in transverse and longitudinal planes. The probe was laid transversely at the inguinal ligament, identifying the common femoral artery and Common Femoral Vein (CFV). The veins were compressed at this site to assist in identification. Colour mode and doppler mode was used to differentiate between arterial and venous flow. Veins were followed distally, compressing every one centimetre.

The popliteal vein was assessed by placing the transducer transversely on the posterior knee. The popliteal vein can be identified in the proximal popliteal fossa with the knee flexed at 10 degrees to 30 degrees.

Statistical Analysis

Data recorded were tabulated in Microsoft Excel sheet for analysis. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 25.0 was used to analyse the data. Mean and standard deviation of the quantitative variables were calculated.

Results

A total of 2200 COVID-19 positive patients with elevated D-dimer levels were included, out of which 1144 (52%) were males and 1056 (48%) were females (Table/Fig 1).

Most of the patients were in 36-55 year age group. The mean age of the patient was 51.4±17.8 years (Table/Fig 2). Among all DVT positive patients 52% were males and 48% were females, showing slight male predominance (Table/Fig 3). The mean age for DVT positive patients was 56.0±12.9 years. The most prevalent age group was 36-55 years while least prevalent between 19-35 years age (Table/Fig 4). Fever was seen in 2090 (95%) patients followed by cough in 1166 (53%) patients (Table/Fig 5).

Many of the patients in the present study had co-morbidities, most common of which were diabetes i.e., 770 (35%) patients and hypertension i.e., 522 (23.7%) patients (Table/Fig 6).

Majority of the present study group i.e., 992 (45%) patients belong to moderate category followed by 773 (35%) patients to severe category (Table/Fig 7). Majority i.e., 497 (62.7%) DVT positive patients belong to severe category followed by 286 (36.1%) patients to moderate category and only 9 (1.2%) patients to mild category.

Deep veins of 662 (30%) patients were non compressible whereas, deep veins of 130 (6%) patients were partially compressible and remaining 1408 (64%) showed normal compressibility and partial or absent colour flow was not noted in 792 (36%) patients of the study (Table/Fig 8). Hypoechoic thrombus was more common than hyper-echoic thrombus and phasic variation and distal augmentation were absent in thrombosed veins on colour mode.

Out of 2200 patients, 792 (36%) patients showed presence of DVT. Most commonly affected vein in DVT was CFV, 704 (88.9%) (Table/Fig 9). Superficial veins thrombosis is also associated with DVT, Short Saphenous Vein (SSV), 439 (55.4%) more than Great Saphenous Vein (GSV), 221 (27.9%) (Table/Fig 10).

Saphenofemoral Junction (SFJ) thrombosis was commonly seen in 352 (44.5%) DVT positive patients (Table/Fig 11). Lower limb oedema was seen in 453 (57%) DVT positive patients. Collaterals were noted in very few i.e., 24 (3%) DVT positive patients.

Majority of DVT positive patients were suffering with hypertension 261 (33%) and diabetes 372 (47%) (Table/Fig 12).

Colour doppler mode longitudinal scan showing partially occluding hypoechoic (acute) thrombus in the poptliteal vein with increased vein diameter (Table/Fig 13). Transverse colour mode scan showing echogenic lumen (subacute thrombus) and complete absent colour flow in CFV and GSV involving saphenofemoral junction (Table/Fig 14).

Discussion

A total of 2200 COVID-19 positive adults were included in the present study comprising 1144 (52%) males and 1056 (48%) females, males were affected with COVID-19 slightly more than females. This might be as a result of the X chromosome’s protection and sex hormones (12).

The total mean age for the subjects was 51.4±17.8 years. The mean age of population in present study was less than those conducted by Nopp S et al., and Weinberg I et al., in which mean age was found to be 62.6 years and 62±15 years, respectively (13),(14).

Current study shows that the most experienced symptoms in COVID-19 patients were fever and cough due to cytokine storm. Fever was seen in 2090 (95%) patients followed by cough in 1166 (53%) patients. This was in accordance with study done by Alimohamadi Y et al., who also found that most common symptoms in COVID-19 patients were fever in 81.2% and cough in 58.5% patients (15).

Many of the patients in the present study had co-morbidities, the most common of which were diabetes i.e., 770 (35%) patients, and hypertension i.e., 522 (23.7%) patients. The diabetic population is more susceptible to infection, due to the associated lymphopenia and to the exaggerated inflammatory response associated with an increased Renin-Angiotensin System (RAS) activation in several tissues (16). It is possible for hypertensives to have lower ACE2 expression, which, when bound by SARS-CoV-2, attenuates any remaining ACE2 and causes angiotensin-II levels to rise, causing COVID-19 (17).

On gray-scale ultrasound, lumen was found anechoic in 1408 (64%) patients, hypoechoic in 513 (23%) patients and hyperechoic in 279 (13%) patients. It is possible to distinguish between acute and chronic thrombus using US. In acute thrombosis, the vein exhibits partial or no compressibility in the absence of collaterals and is engorged by a hypoechoic thrombus. Chronic thrombosis results in a vein that is incompressible, uneven, and narrow, as well as an echogenic thrombus adhered to the venous walls (18).

In the present study, deep veins were completely compressible in 662 (83.5%) patients, partially compressible in 130 (16.5%) patients, and the remaining 1408 (64%) patients showed normal compressibility. The basic US diagnostic standard for acute DVT is still the vein’s non compressibility. A vein with acute thrombosis exhibits limited or no compressibility and is dilated by a hypoechoic thrombus. The vein with chronic thrombosis is incompressible, uneven, and narrow. Additional diagnostic criteria include venous distention, loss of flow phasicity, echogenic thrombus inside the vein lumen, total absence of spectral or colour doppler signal within the vein lumen, and loss of responsiveness to valsalva or augmentation (19).

Normal colour flow was noted in 1408 (64%) patients and partial colour flow noted in 130 (6%) patients and absent colour flow was not noted in 662 (30%) patients of the present study. Lower limb DVT typically manifests in the acute stage with venous distension and absent or partial colour flow depending on the extent of the thrombus and vessel lumen obstruction [19,20]. Oedema was noted in 638 (29%) COVID-19 patients, out of which 462 (21%) patient were associated with thrombosis. In the weeks following a DVT, the process of vein recanalisation, related mediators of inflammation and damage to venous valves cause valvular incompetence (reflux). Venous hypertension brought on by prolonged venous blockage and valvular incompetence causes oedema in a study by Meissner MH et al., (21).

In current study, isolated DVT was found in 132 (16.7%) patients, most commonly affecting CFV in 704 (88.9%) patients followed by Superficial Femoral Vein (SFV) in 616 (77.7%) patients and popliteal vein in 572 (72.2%) patients. Alshoabi SA and Mothanna A found in his study that CFV and SFV were the most common affected veins (19). Khaladkar SM et al., also found in their study that thrombosis was localised to the SFV in 69 (85.2%) patients, CFV in 57 (70.3%) patients, popliteal vein in 54 (66.66%) patients (22).

Along with DVT, superficial vein involvement was seen in 660 (83.3%) patients most commonly affecting SSV in 439 (55.4%) patients followed by GSV in 221 (27.9%) patients. In many of them, thrombus seem extending from the femoral vein into the GSV and from the popliteal vein into the SSV. Leon L et al., found that the presence of DVT in association with saphenous thrombosis ranges from 6% to 53%. Thrombus propagation can occur in a contiguous and in a non contiguous fashion (23).

Thrombosis of SFJ was noted in 352 (44.5%) patients. DVT can develop contiguously with superficial thrombosis via the SFJ. It can also develop independently in a deep vein without direct extension from the superficial vein, in a non contiguous manner. Ascer E et al., results demonstrated a 40% incidence of DVT occurring synchronously with SFJ thrombosis (24).

DVT was detected in 792 of 2200 patients. The prevalence of DVT in the present study was found to be 36%. The prevalence in the present study is comparable to the studies of Rouyer O et al., i.e., 38.5% (25). It came out to be less than the studies of Trigonis RA et al., i.e. 42.2%, while it was more than those conducted by Riyahi S et al., i.e. 14%, Demelo-Rodri´guez P et al., i.e., 14.7%, Weinberg I et al., i.e., 20%, Tan BK et al., i.e., 14.7% and Boonyawat K et al., i.e., 28% (14),(26),(27),(28),(29),(30). Various studies were compared with the present study (Table/Fig 15) (14),(25),(26),(27),(28),(29),(30). This difference could be because of ethnic and racial differences, socio-economic disparities, vaccination coverage, healthcare facilities, etc.

In present study, the mean age for DVT positive patients was 56.0±12.9 years. Age-specific risk factors of thrombosis, i.e., presence of co-morbidities, endothelial dysfunction and frailty may be important in the explanation of the increased incidence of DVT in the elderly. It is proposed by Cushman M that venous thrombosis is a disease of aging, with a low rate before the fourth decade of life, rising rapidly after age 45 years (31).

Among DVT positive patients, males (53%) were affected slightly more than females (47%). Venous thrombosis rates are slightly higher in men than women due to various reasons the most potent of these are genetic factors, co-morbidities and smoking as mentioned in a study by Previtali E et al., (32).

Many patients with DVT were co-morbid, most common of which were diabetic i.e., 372 (47%) patient and hypertensive i.e., 261 (33%) patients. The risk of venous thromboembolism appears to be elevated in diabetic patients. Increased thrombin generation and higher concentration of procoagulant cell-derived circulating microparticles in patients with diabetes suggest that hypercoagulability may play an important pathogenic role in the increased frequency of venous thromboembolism. A study by Piazza G et al., stated 2-fold increase risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with diabetes identifies the diabetic population as being particularly vulnerable to initial venous thromboembolism and disease recurrence (33). Du Y et al., stated 3.12-fold increase risk of venous thromboembolism in old age with hypertension (34).

Prevalence of DVT among COVID-19 positive patients was found to be 36%. Patients having severe clinical grade, Diabetes mellitus and hypertension were most common to develop DVT.

Limitation(s)

The results cannot be generalised to the whole population as the study was carried out in a single-centre.

Conclusion

With decreased immobility, there is sharp increase in incidence of DVT among severe COVID-19 positive patients. Therefore, it becomes important to provide such patients a non invasive and accurate method which allows early diagnosis. Current study showed significant improvement in the diagnosis of DVT in COVID-19 positive patients by ultrasound using compression and colour doppler technique.

References

1.
Hansen AT, Juul S, Knudsen UB, Hvas AM. Low risk of venous thromboembolism following early pregnancy loss in pregnancies conceived by IVF. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(10):1968-72. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Carroll BJ, Piazza G. Hypercoagulable states in arterial and venous thrombosis: When, how, and who to test? Vasc Med. 2018;23(4):388-99. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Hamer JD, Malone PC, Silver IA. The PO2 in venous valve pockets: Its possible bearing on thrombogenesis. Br J Surg. 1981;68:166-70. Doi: 10.1002/bjs. 1800680308. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Brooks EG, Trotman W, Wadsworth MP, Taatjes DJ, Evans MF, Ittleman FP, et al. Valves of the deep venous system: An overlooked risk factor. Blood. 2009;114:1276-79. Doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-209981. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Myers DD, Hawley AE, Farris DM, Wrobleski SK, Thanaporn P, Schaub RG, et al. P-selectin and leukocyte microparticles are associated with venous thrombogenesis. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:1075-89. Doi: 10.1016/S0741-5214(03)01033-4. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Closse C, Seigneur M, Renard M, Pruvost A, Dumain P, Belloc F, et al. Influence of hypoxia and hypoxia-reoxygenation on endothelial P-selectin expression. Thromb Res. 1997;85:159-64. Doi: 10.1016/S0049-3848(96)00233-2. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Naringrekar H, Sun J, Ko C, Rodgers SK. It’s not all deep vein thrombosis: Sonography of the painful lower extremity with multimodality correlation. J Ultrasound Med. 2019;38(4):1075-89. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Lippi G, Favaloro EJ. D-dimer is associated with severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A pooled analysis. Thromb Haemost. 2020;120(5):876-78. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Twigg SJ, McCrirrick A, Sanderson PM. A comparison of post mortem findings with post hoc estimated clinical diagnosis of patients who die in a United Kingdom intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2001;274:706-10. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Forbes K, Stevenson AJ. The use of power Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of isolated deep venous thrombosis of the calf. Clin Radiol. 1998;53:752-54. Doi: 10.1016/S0009-9260(98)80318-8 pmid:9817093. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Treatment Guidelines. National Institutes of Health. Available at: https://www. covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/. Accessed [9 December 2020].
12.
Patanavanich R, Glantz SA. Smoking is associated with COVID-19 progression: A meta-analysis. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020;22:1653-56. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Nopp S, Moik F, Jilma B, Pabinger I, Ay C. Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2020;4(7):1178-91. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Weinberg I, Fernández-Capitán C, Quintana-Díaz M, Demelo-Rodriguez P, De Casasola Gg, Fidalgo Ã, et al. Systematic testing for venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and raised D-dimer levels. Thrombosis Update. 2021;2:100029. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Alimohamadi Y, Sepandi M, Taghdir M, Hosamirudsari H. Determine the most common clinical symptoms in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene. 2020;61(3):E304. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Candido R, Jandeleit-Dahm KA, Cao Z, Nesteroff SP, Burns WC, Twigg SM, et al. Prevention of accelerated atherosclerosis by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in diabetic apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Circulation. 2002;106(2):246-53. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Henry BM, Vikse J. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(19):1860-61. [crossref]
18.
Tapson VF, Carroll BA, Davidson BL, Elliott CG, Fedullo PF, Hales CA, et al. The diagnostic approach to acute venous thromboembolism,clinical practice guideline American thoracic society. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160:1043- 66. Doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.160.3.16030. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Alshoabi SA, Mothanna A. Deep venous thrombosis: Commonly affected veins in the lower limbs. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines. 2019;7(3):12-19. [crossref]
20.
Kassaï B, Boissel JP, Cucherat M, Sonie S, Shah NR, Leizorovicz A. A systematic review of the accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in asymptomatic patients. Thromb Haemost. 2004;91:655-66. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Meissner MH, Wakefield TW, Ascher E, Caprini JA, Comerota AJ, Eklof B, et al. Acute venous disease: Venous thrombosis and venous trauma. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2007;46(6):S25-53. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Khaladkar SM, Thakkar DK, Shinde K, Thakkar DK, Shrotri H, Kulkarni VM. Deep vein thrombosis of the lower limbs: A retrospective analysis of doppler ultrasound findings. Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth. 2014;7:612-19. [crossref]
23.
Leon L, Giannoukas AD, Dodd D, Chan P, Labropoulos N. Clinical significance of superficial vein thrombosis. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2005;29(1):10-17. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Ascer E, Lorensen E, Pollina RM, Gennaro M. Preliminary results of a nonoperative approach to saphenofemoral junction thrombophlebitis. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 1995;22(5):616-21. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Rouyer O, Pierre-Paul IN, Balde AT, Jupiter D, Bindila D, Geny B, et al. High prevalence of deep venous thrombosis in non severe COVID-19 patients hospitalized for a neurovascular disease. Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra. 2020;10(3):174-80. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Trigonis RA, Holt DB, Yuan R, Siddiqui AA, Craft MK, Khan BA, et al. Incidence of venous thromboembolism in critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 patients receiving prophylactic anticoagulation. Critical Care Medicine. 2020 Jun 6. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Riyahi S, Hectors SJ, Prince MR, Sweeney EM, Lane EG, Honya R, et al. Predictors of acute deep venous thrombosis in patients hospitalized for COVID- 19. Medicine. 2021;100(38):e27216. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Demelo-Rodríguez P, Cervilla-Muñoz E, Ordieres-Ortega L, Parra-Virto A, Toledano- Macías M, Toledo-Samaniego N, et al. Incidence of asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and elevated D-dimer levels. Thrombosis Research. 2020;192:23-26. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Tan BK, Mainbourg S, Friggeri A, Bertoletti L, Douplat M, Dargaud Y, et al. Arterial and venous thromboembolism in COVID-19: A study-level meta-analysis. Thorax. 2021;76(10):970-79. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Boonyawat K, Chantrathammachart P, Numthavaj P, Nanthatanti N, Phusanti S, Phuphuakrat A, et al. Incidence of thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Thrombosis Journal. 2020;18(1):01-02. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Cushman M. Epidemiology and risk factors for venous thrombosis. InSeminars in Hematology. 2007;44(2):62-69. WB Saunders. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Previtali E, Bucciarelli P, Passamonti SM, Martinelli I. Risk factors for venous and arterial thrombosis. Blood Transfusion. 2011;9(2):120.
33.
Piazza G, Goldhaber SZ, Kroll A, Goldberg RJ, Emery C, Spencer FA. Venous thromboembolism in patients with diabetes mellitus. The American Journal of Medicine. 2012;125(7):709-16. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Du Y, Zhou N, Zha W, Lv Y. Hypertension is a clinically important risk factor for critical illness and mortality in COVID-19: A meta-analysis. Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases. 2021;31(3):745-55.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/62477.17756

Date of Submission: Dec 24, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Feb 01, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Mar 09, 2023
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Dec 26, 2022
• Manual Googling: Feb 11, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Mar 03, 2023 (20%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com