Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 49555

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : December | Volume : 17 | Issue : 12 | Page : ZC01 - ZC06 Full Version

Evaluation of Dental and Periodontal Health Status in Leprosy Patients during Three Different Stages of Drug Regimen: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: December 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/64907.18760
Madhumita Choudhari, Pavan Bajaj

1. Intern, Department of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Madhumita Choudhari,
Intern, Department of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi, Wardha-442001, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: madhumita.a.choudhari@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The prevalence of oral lesions in leprosy patients and the risk of developing them with the disease are considerably high. Multidrug Therapy (MDT) can effectively treat leprosy, but its effectiveness is heavily dependent on early detection, when chronic disability might be avoided. Poor oral hygiene combined with weakened immunity increases the risk of developing oral lesions in leprosy patients and impacts their overall health.

Aim: To evaluate the oral, dental and periodontal findings in patients during three different stages of drug regimen.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 150 known leprosy patients from four leprosy facilities in the Vidarbha area, Maharashtra, India. Comprehensive oral examination was performed from July 2022 to September 2022, including the Decayed, Missing, Filled Teeth (DMFT) index, assessment of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions (NCCLs), Plaque Index (PI), Papillary bleeding Index (PBI) and complete periodontal examination by measuring Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) and Clinical Attachment Loss (CAL). Descriptive statistics were done utilising SPSS version 23. The Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test was used to check the mean difference between the three groups. The statistical significance established was p<0.05.

Results: The evaluation revealed the prevalence of decayed teeth as 103 out of 150 (68%), that of a missing tooth was 93 out of 150 (62%). NCCLs were found in 80 out of 150 with the prevalence of abrasion as seen in 51 (63.7%) patients and 38 patients (47.5%) for abfraction, and 18 out of 80 patients (22.5%) for erosion. Comparing the PI and PBI between the groups, significantly higher scores were observed in patients who had not undergone treatment (p-value <0.01). CAL was found to be statistically significant with higher scores in patients who had completed their treatment (p-value <0.001).

Conclusion: The findings of the present study indicate that the NCCLS and the DMFT scores were higher in the untreated group. However, there was increased attachment loss in treated patients, which can be supplemented to the drug therapy prescribed for leprosy.

Keywords

Chronic periodontitis, Combination drug therapies, Disease eradication, Hansens disease, Oral health

Leprosy, commonly known as Hansen’s disease, is a chronic infectious disease caused by the bacteria Mycobacterium leprae. Leprosy is a chronic granulomatous infectious illness that manifests slowly over time with a preference for mucous membranes of the respiratory system, skin, and peripheral nerves (1). It is a significant public health concern accounting for the high case burden, morbidity, and associated stigma (2). National Leprosy Eradication Programme (NLEP) reported a total of 65,147 new cases of leprosy in 2020-21, with annual new case detection of 4.56 per 1,00,000 as against 1,14,451 cases in 2019-20. Maharashtra was a significant contributor of over 76 per cent of the cases (3). In the Vidarbha region, the prevalence is clustered in Amravati, Buldhana, Chandrapur, Gadchiroli, Gondia, and Wardha than in other districts (4). Children contracting leprosy from adults is primarily transferred through the oral mucosa, which is accounted for second most common site of M. leprae infection and transmission (5). A nasal lesion that obstructs airflow manifests mouth breathing, which causes low intra-oral temperature, allowing the bacillus to thrive (6),(7). There are two clinical types of the illness recognised: tuberculoid leprosy and lepromatous leprosy.

Various studies (8),(9) mentioned in literature for oral findings in leprosy comprise periodontal diseases, gingival bleeding, papillary hypertrophy, and tooth loss. With the advancement of leprosy, deformities such as claw hands, arthralgia, thumb paralysis, contractures and wounds delimit the patients to maintain oral hygiene (6). The clinical kinds of leprosy are categorised using the actions of M. leprae with the human immune system (7).

MDT is utilised as a treatment model effectively curbing the disease but is associated with various side effects throughout the patient’s life. Many factors, including diet, psychological health, and oral and systemic health, are affected. Literature reveal plethora of oral abnormalities comprised of salivary gland hypofunction, altered saliva composition and flow, increased predisposition of caries susceptibility, periodontal diseases, mucositis, angular cheilitis (10).

Despite the literature establishing the oral health profile of patients with leprosy, there is a significant knowledge gap addressing the oral profile pre to, during, and following the MDT. In order to compare the outcomes across different treatment stages, there is a need to look into the state of comprehensive oral and periodontal integrity within the staged-therapy model.

Hence, the aim of this study was to evaluate the oral, dental and periodontal findings in patients of different stages of leprosy so as to create a guide for clinicians to formulate appropriate oral health conservation and rehabilitative outcomes for such patients during the course of their life. This study makes an effort to examine soft and hard tissue and periodontal health in the oral findings, and correlates them with different stages of leprosy.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional study with 150 patients of leprosy was selected from Anandvan, Amravati, Ashokwan and Dattapur, Maharashtra, India, in the months of July, August and September 2022. The authorised personnel of the leprosy centres were requested to provide written consent. The study was performed under the ethical standards and institutional ethical guidelines prescribed by the university’s Institutional Ethics Committee (Reference no.: DMIMS (DU)/IEC/2022/1190.)

Inclusion criteria: Those dentulous leprosy patients who were having more than 15 teeth, either already under treatment or not yet started with treatment, and consented for study participation were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Edentulous or partially edentulous patients having less than 15 teeth, who do not have any medical records , have not been examined by a medical professional and not giving any consent for participation in the study were excluded.

Sample size estimation: Minimum sample size required

Formula: N=Z21-α/2*p*(1-p)/D2

Z1-α/2=1.96, at 5% level of significance
Percentage of deformities in leprosy patient with deep pockets (highest severity)=6.8%
P=6.8% (11).
D=estimated error (5%)=0.05
=(1.96)2*0.068*(1-0.068)/(0.05)2=98
Minimum sample size required was 98.

Clinical measurements:

The groups were then examined clinically:

Dental examination:

Intraoral hard tissue examination included the examination of:

1. Caries prevalence was noted using the DMFT index as decayed (D), missing (M) and filled (F) teeth (12).
2. NCCLs primarily attrition, abrasion and abfraction on the buccal/labial, lingual, occlusal, mesial, and distal aspects of the teeth.

Oral hygiene status:

1. PI (Sillnes and Loe, 1964) (13) was employed to record plaque on the labial/buccal and lingual surfaces and scored on a 0-3 scale.
2. Papillary Bleeding Index (PBI): A periodontal probe (William’s Calibrated Probe) was carefully inserted into the gingival sulcus at the base of the papilla on the mesial aspect and then moved coronally to the papilla tip, repeating it on the distal aspect of the same papilla. The intensity of bleeding thus provoked was recorded on a 0-4 scale using the PBI (Muhlemann HR, 1977) (14).
The PBI score per person was obtained by totalling all the papillary bleeding scores, divided by the number of surfaces examined.

Periodontal examination:

1. The PPD was recorded with A UNC-15 probe from the free gingival margin to the base of the sulcus (15). CAL was also measured from the gingival margin to the Cement-Enamel Junction (CEJ) (16).

Statistical Analysis

All information was recorded and organised in an MS excel sheet. Descriptive statistics were done utilising SPSS version 23. As the information followed typical distribution, parametric tests were employed to investigate the information. The ANOVA test was used to check the mean difference between the three groups. The post-hoc Tukey HSD test was utilised to check the proportion differences. The statistical significance established was p<0.05.

Results

Among the 150 patients, 54 were men and 96 women. Each group consisted of 50 patients.

A total of 103 out of 150 patients presented with decayed teeth (68.66%). A total of 93 out of 150 patients presented with at least one lost tooth (62.00%), and 64 out of 150 had their teeth filled (42.66%), as displayed in (Table/Fig 1). NCCL were observed in 80 out of 150 patients. A total of 49 out of 96 females (51%) and 31 out of 54 males (57%) that presented with NCCL. A total of 51 out of 80 patients (63.75%) displayed abrasion, 38 out of 80 patients (47.5%) demonstrated the presence of abfraction, and 18 out of 80 patients (22.5%) presented with erosion (Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 4),(Table/Fig 5). Mean DMFT score was highest in Group-3 followed by Group-2. Significant difference in DMFT scores was found between Group-1 and 3 and Group-2 and 3 (p=0.001) (Table/Fig 6).

(Table/Fig 7) shows the descriptive statistics and the output of the ANOVA analysis of the oral hygiene status using PBI and PI. Highest PBI score was found in Group-3 (3.44±0.67) and the difference was significant between all the three groups (p<0.01). PI score was lowest in Group-1, followed by Group-2.

The PPD of patients undergoing treatment was 2.28±0.96, while for patients with completed treatment was 2.54±1.11, the difference between the two groups was 0.2±0.7 which was not statistically significant p-value (0.39) (Table/Fig 8),(Table/Fig 9),(Table/Fig 10),(Table/Fig 11).

The CAL of patients undergoing treatment was 5.06±1.26, while for the patients with completed treatment was 6.64±1.13 and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant p-value=0.001. The CAL of the patients who were not undergoing treatment was 4.02±1.09, while that for patients undergoing treatment was 5.06±1.26, and the difference between the two groups was 1.04±1.77 which was statistically significant p-value=0.001 (Table/Fig 12),(Table/Fig 13),(Table/Fig 14),(Table/Fig 15),(Table/Fig 16).

Discussion

Leprosy is one of the world’s oldest diseases (17). Despite advances in all medical science, leprosy remains a public health concern in countries such as India. The principal weapon against leprosy is MDT, which has drastically reduced the incidence of leprosy in India (18). The therapy’s efficacy largely depends on early diagnosis and prompt intervention.

In the present study, oral and comprehensive periodontal examinations were done on patients in different stages of treatment. The dental examination included scrutiny by DMFT index and NCCLs. The prevalence of decayed teeth was 68%, that of missing teeth was 62%, and of the patients who did not have their teeth filled was 42.6%. The findings were in accordance with the study by Souza VA et al., who reported a prevalence of decayed teeth in 73%, 71.4% of missing teeth and 60.3% of the patients did not have their teeth filled (19). The prevalence of abrasion was 71%, abfraction was 47.5% and 22.5% for erosion, which was similar to the findings by Gadge RS and Bajaj PS in a study that examined 200 patients for NCCLs with the prevalence of abrasion being 77%, 44% for abfraction and 29% for erosion (20). Additionally, it has been discovered that the quantity and quality of saliva play a part in the emergence of these lesions. This could be explained by xerostomia brought on by the medications used to treat the illness, which directly impacts these conditions (21).

Recurrent gingival bleeding, papillary expansion of the gums, tooth loss, and hypoesthesia patch along the boundary of the alveolar mucosa define the lepromatous form of leprosy, which is extremely common. Claw hands, numbness, stiff joints, paralysed thumbs, widespread absorption, contractures, fissures, and ulcers are common in leprosy patients, making it difficult to maintain oral hygiene, which worsens oral health. On periodontal examination, a comparison of the difference between the PPD of the patients in all groups was not statistically significant; however, CAL was found to be statistically significant with higher scores in patients who had completed their treatment (p-value=0.001). The outcomes support those of Matos FZ et al., where the periodontal condition was exhibited in all individuals of groups with gingivitis (63.1%) and periodontitis (25%) (1). Periodontitis was most prevalent (25%) in Group-1 (individuals who had already completed the leprosy treatment).

Souza VA et al., examined leprosy individuals to diagnose roughly 80 to 88% of patients with periodontal disease and gingival bleeding in 92% of the patients, per the present study’s findings (19). Jacob Raja SA et al., evaluated leprosy patients’ oral and periodontal health (6). The study included 62 patients treated in a leprosy centre in the Dindigul district. The most common observation was gingival recession (54.8%), followed by tooth loss (69.5%), mobility (60.86%), attrition (56%), chronic pulpitis (34.7%), and dental caries (26%). A study by Rawlani SM et al., revealed that the prevalence of periodontal disease was 78.75% (22). Radiographic findings showed mean alveolar bone loss of approximately 5.6 mm in the maxilla and mandible, corroborating the above mentioned findings.

The majority of the patients had advanced periodontitis. Previous research by Marks Jr in 1978 demonstrated that resorption of alveolar bone in the anterior maxilla is a typical skeletal deformity of leprosy and likely causes local osteoclast activity (23). Findins of similar studies from the literature has been tabulated in (Table/Fig 17) (1),(6),(19),(20),(22).

All the compiled data point towards declining periodontal health with the disease advancement and the MDT treatment model. Dapsone, clofazimine, rifampicin, ofloxacin, and minocycline were frequently prescribed to these patients as part of the MDT suggested for treating leprosy. The patient also took steroids and anti-inflammatory medications in addition to these antibiotics for a long time. Dapsone therapy has been shown to be capable of causing patients’ hematopoietic changes (24). Thus, the presence of dental findings, including NCCLs, along with an increase in CAL, can be attributed to the adverse effects of the drugs. Oral health is said to be a reflection of systemic health. Poor oral hygiene weakened immunity paves the way for deviation in oral health and impacts an individual’s overall health. To prevent additional morbidity, leprosy patients should be educated about oral health issues and encouraged to practice good dental hygiene and also to improve the quality of life for those undergoing treatment.

Limitation(s)

It is important to note that the samples used in the current study were convenience samples gathered in context of specific centres in Vidarbha, Maharashtra. Hence, they may not be representative of the communities at large being researched. Furthermore, the current data’s non-random and cross-sectional qualities imply that the interpretation of the results should be limited to the groups examined at the time of this research. Given the size of the disease in relation to public health and the high incidence of the disease in India, the upper airways are the most important entryway for the bacillus and the oral and para-oral findings of broad disease beginning; leprosy is not mentioned frequently in dental literature on a longitudinal basis. As a result, when considering the current findings and conclusions, readers should approach with caution.

Conclusion

This study concludes that there was a correlation between declining oral health with the advancement of disease. The findings of the present study re-emphasise the presence of dental and periodontal findings in various stages of leprosy including caries, NCCLs and increased CAL. The increased attachment loss in treated patients can be supplemented to the drug therapy prescribed for leprosy. The key take home message for clinicians and public health professionals is to be more forthcoming with regard to the disease’s progression and the broader implications of disease and treatment approaches including early diagnosis along with the formulation of preventive and therapeutic treatment models, with vigilant screening of relevant findings to lessen the burden of disease.

Acknowledgement

The author acknowledges the help from the College Authority, leprosy centres, Departments and resources provided for this clinical research.

Author’s contribution: Author Madhumita conceptualised and gathered the data about this clinical research. Dr. Pavan put the necessary input was given towards the design of the manuscript. The authors discussed and finalised the final manuscript.

References

1.
Matos FZ, Aranha AMF, Borges ÃH, Pedro FLM, Raslan SA, Hamida F, et al. Can different stages of leprosy treatment influence the profile of oral health? Oral status in leprosy. Med Oral Patol Oral Cirugia Bucal. 2018;23(4):e376-83. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Katkar D, Mote BN, Adhav A, Muthuvel T, Kadam S. Epidemiological perspective of national leprosy eradication programme in Maharashtra: Focusing on “tribal hot-spot” of tribal district. Indian J Community Med Off Publ Indian Assoc Prev Soc Med. 2017;42(3):174-76. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Directorate General of Health Services. 2022. National Leprosy Eradication Programme. [online]. Available from: https://dghs.gov.in/content/1349_3_NationalLeprosyEradicationProgramme.aspx.
4.
Scheepers A. Correlation of oral surface temperatures and the lesions of leprosy. Int J Lepr Mycobact Dis Off Organ Int Lepr Assoc. 1998;66(2):214-17.
5.
Costa A, Nery J, Oliveira M, Cuzzi T, Silva M. Oral lesions in leprosy. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2003;69(6):381-85.
6.
Jacob Raja SA, Raja JJ, Vijayashree R, Priya BM, Anusuya GS, Ravishankar P. Evaluation of oral and periodontal status of leprosy patients in Dindigul district. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2016;8(Suppl 1):S119-21. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Pardillo FEF, Fajardo TT, Abalos RM, Scollard D, Gelber RH. Methods for the classification of leprosy for treatment purposes. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2007;44(8):1096-99. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Vohra P, Rahman MSU, Subhada B, Tiwari RVC, Nabeel Althaf MS, Gahlawat M. Oral manifestation in leprosy: A cross-sectional study of 100 cases with literature review. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2019;8(11):3689-94. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Gupta B, Gupta S, Chaudhary M, Raj AT, Patil S. Oro-facial manifestations in lepromatous leprosy patients in Central India: Clinical findings from a cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(6):1981-86. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Govindasamy K, John AS, Lal V, Arif M, Solomon RM, Ghosal J, et al. A comparison of three types of targeted, community-based methods aimed at promoting early detection of new leprosy cases in rural parts of three endemic states in India. PloS One. 2021;16(12):e0261219. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Chaluvaraj R, Hiremath SS. Assessment of the oral health status and treatment needs of leprosy afflicted patients in central leprosorium and rehabilitation centres in Bangalore city. J Indian Assoc Public Health Dent. 2003;3(3):09-13.
12.
Organisation WH. Oral health surveys: Basic methods. World Health Organisation; 2013.
13.
Löe H. The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems. J Periodontol. 1967;38(6):610-16. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Mühlemann HR. Psychological and chemical mediators of gingival health. Rev Odontostomatol (Paris). 1977;6(5):352-57.
15.
Hefti AF. Periodontal probing. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1997;8(3):336-56.[crossref][PubMed]
16.
Vandana KL, Gupta I. The location of cemento enamel junction for CAL measurement: A clinical crisis. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2009;13(1):12-15. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Bennett BH, Parker DL, Robson M. Leprosy: Steps along the journey of eradication. Public Health Rep. 2008;123(2):198-205. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Desikan K. Multi-drug regimen in leprosy and its impact on prevalence of the disease. Med J Armed Forces India. 2003;59(1):02-04. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Souza VA, Emmerich A, Coutinho EM, Freitas MG, Silva EH, Mercon FG, et al. Dental and oral condition in leprosy patients from Serra, Brazil. Lepr Rev. 2009;80(2):156-63. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Gadge RS, Bajaj PS. Clinical evaluation of non-carious cervical lesions in lepromatous and tuberculoid leprosy. Med Sci. 2020;24(104):2460-66.
21.
Cunha-Cruz J, Scott J, Rothen M, Mancl L, Lawhorn T, Brossel K, et al. Salivary characteristics and dental caries: Evidence from general dental practices. J Am Dent Assoc. 2013;144(5):e31-40. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Rawlani SM, Rawlani S, Degwekar S, Bhowte RR, Motwani M. Oral health status and alveolar bone loss in treated leprosy patients of central India. Indian J Lepr. 2011;83(4):215-24.
23.
Marks Jr SC. The cellular basis for extremity bone loss in leprosy. Int J Lepr. 1979;47(1):26-32.
24.
Gupta B, Gupta S, Chaudhary M, Raj AT, Awan KH, Patil S. Hematological alterations in lepromatous leprosy: A cross-sectional observational study. Dis Mon. 2020;66(7):100919.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/64907.18760

Date of Submission: Apr 21, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jul 05, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Oct 31, 2023
Date of Publishing: Dec 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 2, 2023
• Manual Googling: Aug 17, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Oct 26, 2023 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 9

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com