Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 47824

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2023 | Month : December | Volume : 17 | Issue : 12 | Page : OD01 - OD04 Full Version

Polyglandular Syndrome with Complications and a Rare Co-existence of Hypercortisolism in a Young Girl: An Internist Approach


Published: December 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/63894.18823
K Vidhya, P Ananth Krishnan, Prasan Kumar Panda

1. Intern, Department of Internal Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India. 2. Resident, Department of Internal Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.

Correspondence Address :
Prasan Kumar Panda,
Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, Sixth Floor, College Block, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Rishikesh-249203, Uttarakhand, India.
E-mail: motherprasanna@rediffmail.com

Abstract

Patients diagnosed with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) can sometimes manifest as part of broader clinical presentations known as Autoimmune Polyglandular Syndromes (APS). APS refers to a group of rare autoimmune disorders in which multiple endocrine glands are affected by autoimmune attacks. There are four types of APS described so far, including APS1, APS2, APS3 and APS4. In contrast to APS1 and APS2, APS3 does not involve the adrenal cortex. In APS3, autoimmune thyroiditis occurs with other organ-specific autoimmune diseases, excluding Addison’s disease. A 20-year-old female with a known case of T1DM, Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), hypothyroidism, and hypertension recently presented with a hypertensive emergency. On further evaluation, she was also diagnosed as a possible case of APS3 with a rare presentation of hypercortisolism instead of Addison’s disease. Various challenges were faced while managing her diabetes due to the brittle diabetes pattern she showed, and also there was a dilemma in the conclusive diagnosis of hypercortisolism in this patient due to the co-existing CKD.

Keywords

Chronic kidney disease, Hypothyroidism, Hypercortisolism, Hypertensive emergency, Type 1 diabetes mellitus

Case Report

A 20-year-old female reported to the Department of Internal Medicine, with a chief complaint of headache associated with 3-4 episodes of vomiting for seven days. The pain was acute in onset, persistent, holocranial in nature with moderate-severe intensity. Vomiting was non-projectile, non bilious, non blood stained, associated with nausea, burning and non radiating pain sensation in epigastrium. The patient also complained of stabbing chest pain of acute onset, persistent, non progressive and non radiating in nature with moderate to severe intensity, with no history of anuria, burning micturition, fever, cough, palpitations, and yellowish discolouration of eyes.

She was a known case, presenting with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) for 15 years on an insulin basal bolus regimen (non-compliant to medication) with poor glycaemic control and primary hypothyroidism for 3 years on regular intake of levothyroxine 75 mg since three years, Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) for 5 months (non dialysis dependent) and hypertension for 4-5 months on irregular medication. She also had a history of multiple hospital admissions in the last 6 months with Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA) episodes, hypertensive emergency, and even the requirement of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) care and mechanical ventilation during her previous admission. While admitting to the hospital, the patient was drowsy but oriented to time, place, and person, with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 14/15 (E4V4M6). On examination, she had a Blood Pressure (BP) recording of 210/120 mmHg, pulse rate 96/minute, and vitally stable otherwise. On palpation, she had bilateral pitting pedal oedema (Table/Fig 1). Chest examination revealed bilateral infrascapular coarse crackles. She was admitted and evaluated as a case of hypertensive emergency. Labetalol intravenous (i.v.) boluses of 20/40 mg (as per BP recordings) and i.v. diuretics (Torsemide 20 mg i.v. BD) were used to treat her in the initial 2-3 days, after which she was shifted to oral antihypertensives and oral diuretics. This hypertensive crisis was due to incorrect pharmaceutical consumption (self-underdosing) after a review of her medical history. Her antihypertensive medications (Tab Clonidine 0.3 mg TDS, Tab Prazosin 5 mg OD, Tab Nifedipine Retard 30 mg TDS) were adjusted, and her BP was controlled. Simultaneously, Random Blood Sugar (RBS) was found to be 286 mg/dL, and Arterial Blood Gas (ABG) analysis revealed high anion gap metabolic acidosis (pH=7.28, HCO3=14 mEq/L, paCO2=31.1 mmHg, paO2=69.1 mmHg) with urine ketone positive, confirmed to be a case of DKA. The patient was immediately started on fluid therapy and insulin infusion, which continued for 48 hours. Strict monitoring of urine output, blood gas parameters, blood sugar, and electrolytes was done to monitor the response, and after 48 hours, she was shifted to a basal-bolus insulin regimen.

The patient presented with findings of normocytic normochromic anaemia, deranged blood glucose, and kidney profiles. She also had extremely elevated anti-Thyroid Peroxidase (anti-TPO) antibodies and an abnormal thyroid profile with a hypothyroidism picture (details provided in (Table/Fig 2)). Urine Routine/Microscopy (R/M) was abnormal and 24-hour urine protein excretion was highly elevated. Initial Ultrasonography (USG) also suggested the presence of medical renal disease (Table/Fig 2).

Renal artery Doppler was done as part of the investigation of secondary hypertension that revealed normal study. She was also evaluated for Cushing syndrome, as part of secondary hypertension evaluation. Serum cortisol after dexamethasone suppression overnight, serum midnight cortisol, and morning cortisol at 8 am were performed and revealed elevated levels (20.40 μg/dL with normal range <1.8 μg/dL). As there are high chances of false hypercortisolemia in CKD patients, midnight salivary cortisol test was planned, but couldn’t be done due to financial constraints. Because of the anti-Hepatitis C Virus (anti-HCV) positive status (accidental detection during baseline investigations), an HCV Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) load was tested, which revealed an undetectable target with normal Liver Function Test (LFT) and normal liver in ultrasound. Patient had symptoms of blurring of vision intermittently, eye fundus examination was performed that revealed bilateral non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy and grade-2 hypertensive nephropathy. On neuropathy evaluation, she was diagnosed with severe sensory neuropathy.

She was oligo-anuric with a persistent range of serum creatinine, nephrotic range proteinuria, and eGFR of 11 mL/min/1.73 m2 during the hospital course. Nephrology opinion was sought and she was treated conservatively as a case of diabetic kidney disease, with diuretics (Torsemide 20 mg PO BD) and adequate fluid management. For diabetes mellitus management, she had undergone seven points RBS charting, a strict diabetic diet, and a basal bolus regimen, and her sugar levels were kept under control during her hospital stay. During the titration of insulin dose, the patient experienced sporadic episodes of hypoglycaemia and very high blood sugar values, hence the possibility of brittle diabetes was also kept in perspective. Tablet Ramipril (2.5 mg BD) was started because of proteinuria and hypertension; however, it was later withdrawn because of hyperkalemia after a three-day course.

Clinically, she improved gradually and blood pressure and sugar got controlled. Hepatitis B and pneumococcal vaccines were started in view of CKD. Proper diabetic education was given to patient and attender, and was discharged with advice of strict compliance to medication and regular follow-up.

The patient was completely well and asymptomatic at discharge. Due to a range of reasons, including non compliance to drug therapy, she was admitted 2-3 times again within a duration of 4-5 months, with similar complaints and eventually lost to follow-up.

Discussion

With a prevalence of >90% among individuals with T1DM and autoimmune disorders, affective thyroid disease is the most common concomitant organ-specific autoimmune illness in adults (1). T1DM can be part of endocrine syndromes like Autoimmune Polyglandular Syndrome (APS) (1).

These are uncommon medical conditions characterised by the destruction of both endocrine and non-endocrine organs due to the infiltration of T-lymphocytes directed by organ-specific antibodies (2). There are recognised patterns of polyendocrine deficiencies, which can be attributed to both monogenic and polygenic variations. Historically, this array of clinical characteristics has led to the categorisation of these disorders as Type-1, Type-2, Type-3, or Type-4 APS. Type-3 APS is the most prevalent, primarily characterised by Thyroid Autoimmune Disease (TAD), and it is typically observed in middle-aged females. Within Type-3 APS, there exist several subtypes distinguished by the presence of other organ-specific autoimmune conditions: Type-3a involves TAD along with T1DM, Type-3b involves TAD along with pernicious anaemia, and Type-3c involves TAD along with conditions such as vitiligo, alopecia, or other organ-specific autoimmune diseases (2).

In the present case, the patient had a history of T1DM for 15 years and later on she developed hypothyroidism and hypercortisolism which is attributed to autoimmunity considering the age of presentation. High cost of blood investigations to assess the pancreatic autoantibodies prevented from doing the same. However, young age of onset, absence of family history, and absence of signs of insulin resistance were conclusive for a clinical diagnosis of T1DM. To check for autoimmune thyroiditis, serum Anti-TPO level was evaluated, which came out to be significantly raised.

A case report published by Lakhotia M et al., from India reported a case of a 29-year-old male presented with Type-2 APS. However, his first presentation with hypothyroidism preceding the adrenal insufficiency was a rare occurrence, and also the co-existence of celiac disease was another rare thing (3). A retrospective study conducted by Shaikh SB et al., across 100 T1DM patients showed that 29% of T1DM subjects had autoimmune thyroid disorder (Hashimoto’s or Graves’ disease), 5% were diagnosed with vitamin B12 deficiency, 4% had Addison’s disease, and 6% showed vitiligo. A 28% had a family history of autoimmune endocrinopathy. These all were pointing towards high prevalence of APS in T1DM patients (4). It is worth noting that CKD is recognised to induce physiological hypercortisolism, which can lead to a clinical presentation resembling that of Cushing’s disease. However, the exact cause and timing of symptom presentation in these two conditions are not clearly distinguishable. Furthermore, certain aspects of CKD may complicate the accurate interpretation of biochemical findings that would typically diagnose Cushing’s disease in patients with normal renal function (5).

The APSs manifest as distinct clusters of endocrine irregularities, which exhibit discernible patterns in individuals with immune dysregulation. Recognising these patterns allows for the treatment and anticipation of associated systemic or other hormonal deficiencies (6). Notably, approximately 20% of patients diagnosed with T1DM present with Thyroglobulin (TG) and TPO antibodies. However, only a minority of them progress to clinical or biochemical hypothyroidism, rendering APS3 (also known as APS2b) relatively common (7). In the context of this case, APS 1 and APS 2 were ruled out due to the absence of adrenal insufficiency. Currently, there is no universally accepted set of guidelines for the diagnosis and management of APS Type-3. Nevertheless, it would be prudent to consider this diagnosis in patients with TAD, as other studies have indicated that as many as 52% of individuals with TAD could potentially meet the criteria for an APS Type-3 diagnosis (7). It is worth noting that this case represents a rare presentation due to the presence of hypercortisolism instead of Addison’s disease in association with all these autoimmune conditions.

Overt endogenous glucocorticoid excess (Cushing’s syndrome) is a well-recognised cause of hyperglycaemia (8); however, due to the low prevalence (1/500,000) in the general population (9), its epidemiological role on diabetes development is trivial. Subclinical hypercortisolism is a recently defined entity, characterised by impaired ACTH/cortisol homeostasis without classical signs or symptoms of Cushing’s syndrome as in present case (10). Preliminary reports have suggested that these patients are at high risk of T2DM (11) and, most importantly, those who are diabetic are expected to experience clinical improvement after hypercortisolism removal (12), whereas in T1DM, Addison’s disease is most commonly associated. Addison’s disease occurs more frequently in patients with T1DM as part of the APS (13). Conversely, in some patients, diabetes may be attributed to insulin resistance due to hypercortisolism too. In this case, the patient was presenting with a rare presentation of T1DM being associated with subclinical hypercortisolism.

However, the occurrence of hypercortisolism is infrequent in APS. Simultaneously, it was essential to take into consideration that elevated levels of plasma cortisol represent a well- documented characteristic of CKD. It has been suggested that the heightened inflammatory state in CKD leads to increased activation of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) axis, resulting in escalated cortisol secretion [14,15]. Additionally, the extended half-life of plasma cortisol and its metabolites in CKD, partially attributable to reduced renal excretion, may contribute to this phenomenon. Furthermore, the presence of higher concentrations of glucuronide conjugates and steroids (aside from cortisol) in the serum of CKD patients can cross-react with antisera used in cortisol immunoassays [14,15]. Any combination of these factors could potentially increase the likelihood of obtaining false-positive results when measuring plasma cortisol levels for the diagnosis of Cushing’s disease. To address this diagnostic challenge, the measurement of midnight salivary cortisol, while not entirely specific to CKD, is recommended over several evenings in such cases. The circadian rhythms of cortisol and ACTH prove to be the most accurate indicator for guiding a definitive diagnosis in this context. Additionally, thorough attention should be paid to signs, symptoms, and clinical history (5).

Unfortunately, we were unable to conduct these investigations due to their unavailability. Consequently, we cannot rule out hypercortisolism induced by CKD in this case, and we could not definitively diagnose Cushing’s syndrome under these circumstances. The hypercortisolism observed in various screening tests had to be attributed to the phenomenon of false hypercortisolism often seen in CKD patients.

Another diagnostic fallacy we faced in this case was the glomerular range proteinuria associated variations of endocrine hormone levels. Urinary loss of T4 binding globulin and various proteins can cause false low values of thyroid hormones. At the same time, nephrotic range proteinuria can cause urinary loss of cortisol binding globulin, leading to false low levels of serum cortisol, which is exactly reverse in this case.

Another challenge faced during treatment of this patient was the high variability of blood glucose levels. She had past history of DKA episodes, RBS values up to 500 mg/dL range, and hypoglycaemic episodes during the hospital course. Brittle diabetes, which represents the most severe phenotype of high glucose variability was kept as possibility. Historically, brittle diabetes was described as severe glycaemic instability of blood glucose levels with frequent and unpredictable episodes of hypoglycaemia and/or DKA that disrupt life activities, often requiring frequent and/or prolonged hospitalisations (16). These patients usually have T1DM or pancreatic diabetes (e.g., post-pancreatectomy). Risk factors include duration of diabetes (cognitive impairment, advanced renal disease). Patient had various risk factors as above, which led her to this condition. The basal bolus regimen had to be blocked, and to switch to continuous insulin infusion with hourly strict monitoring for a better control. Later her daily insulin requirement was calculated and shifted to basal bolus regimen. Strict adherence to diabetic diet, and proper diabetic education helped to achieve target range sugars later. Hypertension is both a cause and effect of CKD and contributes to its progression (17). As estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) declines, the incidence and severity of hypertension increase (18). Additionally, hypertension and CKD are both independent risk factors for Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD). When both exist together the risks of CVD morbidity and mortality are substantially increased (19). As seen in this patient, whether hypertension or CKD is the first event, is a matter of mystery. However, the long-standing history of diabetes, normal sized kidneys, nephrotic range proteinuria, diabetic retinopathy all were in favour of diabetic kidney disease, and CKD may be considered as the triggering agent for the young age hypertension presentation.

As seen in patients having multiple arrays of diseases, this patient too was under a multitude of medications for her treatment. Multimorbidity, commonly defined as the co-existence of two or more chronic health conditions, is common in the older population (20). Managing multiple chronic conditions presents significant challenges for both healthcare providers and patients, and it exerts a detrimental impact on overall health outcomes. Multimorbidity is associated with a range of adverse consequences, including diminished quality of life, self- reported health, mobility, and functional capacity. It also leads to an increased likelihood of hospitalisations, physical discomfort, greater utilisation of healthcare resources, higher mortality rates, and elevated healthcare costs (21).

In the case of this young female patient, it was noteworthy that she was prescribed numerous medications, a condition commonly referred to as polypharmacy, which is more prevalent among older individuals with multiple chronic conditions. Polypharmacy carries its own set of unfavourable effects, encompassing increased mortality risk, heightened susceptibility to falls, severe medicationrelated reactions, prolonged hospitalisation, and a greater likelihood of hospital readmission shortly after discharge (22).

Conclusion

The APS3 comprises autoimmune endocrine disorders like hypothyroidism and T1DM but typically lacks Addison’s disease, and may include hypercortisolism. Diagnosing Cushing’s syndrome in CKD patients remains challenging due to frequently false-positive test results. Patients with T1DM and concurrent renal issues require diligent monitoring, diabetic education, and strict dietary adherence to manage their condition. Autoimmune conditions often underlie the development of multiple chronic health issues in young patients. Polypharmacy is a concern not only among the elderly but also among younger individuals with multiple health conditions.

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to thank Dr. Saurabh Kumbhar, Resident, Department of Medicine for helping in data collection in this case study.

References

1.
Kawasaki E. Type 1 diabetes and autoimmunity. Clin Pediatr Endocrinol. 2014; 23(4):99-105. Doi: 10.1297/cpe.23.99. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Apolinario M, Brussels A, Cook CB, Yang S. Autoimmune polyglandular syndrome type A: A case report of an unusual presentation and literature review. Clin Case Rep. 2022;10(2):e05391. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Lakhotia M, Pahadia HR, Kumar H, Singh J, Tak S. A case of autoimmune polyglandular syndrome (APS) type II with hypothyroidism, hypoadrenalism, and celiac disease: A rare combination. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(4):OD01-03. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Shaikh SB, Haji IM, Doddamani P, Rahman M. A study of autoimmune polyglandular syndrome (APS) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) followed up at a tertiary care hospital. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(2):70-72. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Raff H, Trivedi H. Circadian rhythm of salivary cortisol, plasma cortisol, and plasma ACTH in end-stage renal disease. Endocr Connect. 2013;23-31. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Cojocaru M, Cojocaru IM, Silosi I. Multiple autoimmune syndrome. Maedica. 2010;5(2):132-34.
7.
Perheentupa J, Miettinen A. Autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type I. In: Eisenbarth GS, editor. Molecular mechanisms of endocrine and organ-specific autoimmunity. RG Landes; 1999. pp. 19-40.
8.
Arnaldi G, Angeli A, Atkinson AB, Bertagna X, Cavagnini F, Chrousos GP, et al. Diagnosis and complications of Cushing’s syndrome: A consensus statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:5593-602. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Reincke M. Subclinical Cushing’s syndrome. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2000;29:47-56. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Chidiac RM, Aron DC. Incidentalomas: A disease of modern technology. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1997;26:233-53. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Rossi R, Tauchmanova` L, Luciano A, Di Martino M, Battista C, Del Viscovo L, et al. Subclinical Cushing’s syndrome in patients with adrenal incidentaloma: Clinical and biochemical features. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:1440-48. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Bernini G, Moretti A, Iacconi P, Miccoli P, Nami R, Lucani B, et al. Anthropometric, haemodynamic, humoral and hormonal evaluation in patients with incidental adrenocortical adenomas before and after surgery. Eur J Endocrinol. 2003;148:213-19. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Zelissen PM, Bast EJ, Croughs RJ. Associated autoimmunity in Addison’s disease. J Autoimmun. 1995;8:121-30. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Lacroix A, Feelders RA, Stratakis CA, Nieman LK. Cushing’s syndrome. Lancet. 2015;386(9996):913-27. Doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61375-1. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Nolan GE, Smith JB, Chavre VJ, Jubiz W. Spurious overestimation of plasma cortisol in patients with chronic renal failure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1981;52(6):1242-45. Doi: 10.1210/jcem-52-6-1242. PMID: 7229002. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Hirsch IB, Gaudiani LM. A new look at brittle diabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 2021;35(1):107646. Doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2020.107646. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Muntner P, Anderson A, Charleston J, Chen Z, Ford V, Makos G, et al. Hypertension awareness, treatment, and control in adults with CKD: Results from the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;55:441-51. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Bidani AK, Griffin KA. Pathophysiology of hypertensive renal damage: Implications for therapy. Hypertension. 2004;44:595-601. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Gansevoort RT, Correa-Rotter R, Hemmelgarn BR, Jafar TH, Heerspink HJ, Mann JF, et al. Chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular risk: Epidemiology, mechanisms, and prevention. Lancet. 2013;382:339-52. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Salive ME. Multimorbidity in older adults. Epidemiol Rev. 2013;35:75-83. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Marengoni A, Angleman S, Melis R, Mangialasche F, Karp A, Garmen A, et al. Aging with multimorbidity: A systematic review of the literature. Ageing Res Rev. 2011;10(4):430-39. Doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2011.03.003. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Milton JC, Hill-Smith I, Jackson SHD. Prescribing for older people. BMJ. 2008;336:606: Doi: 10.1136/bmj.39503.424653.80.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63894.18823

Date of Submission: Mar 05, 2023
Date of Peer Review: May 12, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Oct 30, 2023
Date of Publishing: Dec 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 13, 2023
• Manual Googling: Jun 15, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Oct 26, 2023 (6%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com