Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 38172

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Short Communication
Year : 2023 | Month : December | Volume : 17 | Issue : 12 | Page : BM01 - BM05 Full Version

Serum Biochemical Changes among Chronic Kidney Disease Patients in a Rural Cohort of Odisha, India: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: December 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/57859.18829
Pujarini Dash, Soumya Ranjan Nayak, Debadutta Sahoo, Khokan Rana, Swetalina Nayak, Kanhu Charan Mohanty, Sanghamitra Pati, Subrata Kumar Palo

1. Scientist, Department of MRHRU, Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 2. Statistician, Department of MRHRU, Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 3. Scientist, Department of MRHRU, Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 4. Research Assistant, Department of MRHRU, Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 5. Research Assistant, Department of MRHRU, Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 6. Laboratory Technician, Department of MRHRU, Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 7. Director, Department of MRHRU, Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 8. Scientist, Department of MRHRU, Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Correspondence Address :
Subrat Kumar Palo,
Scientist, Department of MRHRU, Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar-751023, Odisha, India.
E-mail: drpalsubrat@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is one of the fastest-growing causes of death worldwide. Monitoring biochemical parameters such as liver function tests, kidney function tests, and lipid profiles is crucial for early identification of health complications, prevention, and prompt management in CKD patients.

Aim: To investigate the association of sociodemographic factors and serum biochemical indicators with Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) among CKD patients in rural Odisha, India.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a rural cohort of the Model Rural Health Research Unit (MRHRU) established in Cuttack district, Odisha, India, from March 2021 to April 2021. A total of 530 registered CKD patients were enrolled in the study. Sociodemographic data and blood samples were collected for lipid profile, kidney function, and liver function analysis. The data were analysed using STATA 15.1 and RStudio 2021.09.0+351.

Results: The mean age of the study participants was 51.2±14.1 years, with 330 (62.26%) being male. A total of 74% of the participants showed abnormal Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR). Abnormal eGFR was found to be more common among the older age group (>45 years), those who were literate, and those in private jobs, compared to their counterparts. Both lipid profile and liver function abnormalities were significantly associated with individuals having normal eGFR.

Conclusion: The positive association of eGFR with lipid profile and liver function enzymes highlights the importance of regular screening of these parameters among CKD patients for early prevention and control of future complications.

Keywords

Glomerular filtration rate, Kidney function test, Lipid profile, Liver function test

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is one of the most important public health problems in the world, with a prevalence of 13.4% (11.7-15.1%) (1). CKD is defined as a GFR of less than 60 mL/min/ 1.73 m² for three months or more, irrespective of the cause (2). If not treated in time, it may lead to kidney failure, cardiovascular disease, and premature death (2). Regular laboratory follow-up is crucial, especially in high-risk groups such as people with diabetes or hypertension, for preventing any adverse conditions (2).

From a diagnostic perspective, several biochemical markers exist in the serum (serum urea and creatinine concentration) and urine (albumin-to-creatinine ratio), which can be used as markers for renal dysfunction or injury. Most of these biomarkers are associated with their own advantages and disadvantages that should be considered before utilising them for regular monitoring and diagnosis of CKD. Although serum creatinine has been used as an endogenous biomarker for renal function, its dependence on muscle mass stands as a limitation for its use (3). Similarly, despite guidelines recommending testing urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio to analyse kidney dysfunction, its lack of sensitivity and specificity for progressive decline in eGFR has been widely reported (4).

The GFR is defined as the flow of plasma from the glomerulus into Bowman’s space over a specified period and is the most widely used parameter to measure kidney function. The eGFR depends on the serum creatinine level in patients with kidney disease (5). The level of liver enzymes in the serum is suggestive of aggression against hepatocytes (6). Interestingly, patients with CKD on haemodialysis have been found to have lower levels of liver enzymes in the serum than those with normal renal function (7).

An association has been observed between one liver enzyme, Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), and increased mortality in CKD patients before dialysis and on dialysis as well (8). Due to continuous changes in dietary habits and lifestyle, risk factors for CKD are increasing. Some research studies have reported that the intake of a high-fat and high-sugar diet increases the incidence of CKD [9,10]. The prevalence of dyslipidaemia was found to be 78.67% among non diabetic CKD patients admitted to a hospital in India, and it was accompanied by decreased High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) and Triglycerides (TG) levels in the serum (11).

However, the role of TG, cholesterol, Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL), and HDL in the development and progression of CKD is still unclear. Further studies are inevitable to understand whether these are independent risk factors for CKD or if they associate with eGFR, and which type of lipid has the greatest impact on CKD. In India, the rural health system is unable to manage the rising burden of CKD due to a shortage of qualified doctors, specifically nephrologists, leading to under-diagnosis and under-treatment, resulting in a high rate of adverse outcomes among CKD patients (12).

Furthermore, most researchers focus on urban settings, and research on CKD patients residing in rural areas remains in the background. The present study focused on CKD patients in a rural area that is known to have a large number of CKD patients and aims to understand the sociodemographic as well as serum biochemical risk factors among them. Additionally, no similar study has been conducted in a rural cohort from the eastern region of India.

The MRUHU, Tigiria, is a unit of Indian Council of Medical Research-Regional Medical Research Centre (ICMR-RMRC), Bhubaneswar, situated in a rural area of Odisha, an eastern state of India. The catchment area of this MRHRU harbours some blocks that are known to be CKD hotspots (according to secondary data collected from hospitals in respective places). The present study was conducted to study the sociodemographic parameters and evaluate different biochemical indicators (serum creatinine, liver function enzymes: total and direct bilirubin, Serum Glutamic-oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT); Serum Glutamic-pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT); lipid profile: Total Cholesterol (TC); TG; HDL; LDL and Very Low-density Lipoprotein (VLDL) in CKD patients and also to check their association with eGFR.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in the rural catchment area (three blocks: Tigiria, Badamba and Narasjnghapur) of MRHRU, Cuttack, Odisha, during March 2021-April 2021. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) of ICMR-RMRC, Bhubaneswar (ICMR-RMRC/IHEC-2021/89).

Inclusion criteria: Registered CKD patients with all grades, aged 18 years and above, who gave written informed consent were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Pregnant women and individuals with cognitive impairment were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: The minimum sample size for the finite population was calculated as 564, using the following formula:

n=(deff*N*p*q)/[(d2/Z2)*(N-1)+p*q]

where n=sample size; deff=design effect; N=population size; p=estimated proportion; q=1-p; d=desired precision or absolute level of precision. Assuming a prevalence of dyslipidaemia as 78.6% (11), an absolute precision of 3.93%, and a non response rate of 10%, for a finite population of 322,056.

Study Procedure

Data of registered CKD patients were collected from the hospital CKD register of respective areas. From a total of 2,481 registered CKD patients, 570 were randomly chosen and approached for their participation, and 545 patients consented to participate. On the day of sample collection, a total of 530 patients came to the facility, and using a validated structured proforma, sociodemographic data (age, gender, education, caste, occupation, etc.) were recorded through the Open Data Kit (ODK) smartphone application.

A 3 mL blood sample was collected using aseptic techniques under careful supervision and immediately sent to the Model Rural Health Research Unit (MRHRU) laboratory for serum separation by the centrifugation method (3,000 rpm for three minutes at room temperature). Out of all, 37 samples could not be processed for liver function tests, and one sample could not be analysed for SGOT, SGPT, and ALP due to an insufficient amount of sample volume.

Laboratory procedure: All the serum biochemical tests were done at the MRHRU laboratory, Tigiria, using the Erba Chem 5x semi-auto analyser. Biochemical test methods and reference ranges for all the laboratory parameters are presented in (Table/Fig 1) (13),(14).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using STATA 15.1 and RStudio 2021.09.0+351. Univariate descriptive analysis was used to determine the prevalence of abnormal eGFR across the sociodemographic characteristics of the population. A multivariate binary logistic regression model was adopted to assess the association of abnormal eGFR with sociodemographic characteristics. Bivariate Chi-square analysis was conducted to examine the categorical association of eGFR status with lipid profile and liver function. The correlation between eGFR values and individual lipid profile and liver function indicators was represented graphically through a correlation plot.

Results

Out of 530 CKD patients, a total of 392 participants had abnormal eGFR. The highest number of patients 219 (55.87%) in the age group of 45-64 years had a significantly higher Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) of 3.65 for having abnormal eGFR compared to the age group of 18-44 years, where 71 (18.11%) patients had abnormal eGFR. Among the 330 males and 200 females, 258 (65.82%) males and 134 (34.18%) females had abnormal eGFR, with males having a higher AOR of 2.23 for the risk of abnormal eGFR, although this was not statistically significant. Among the three different caste categories, the majority of patients, 154 (39.23%) in the general category and 153 (39.03%) participants in the Other Backward Caste (OBC) group, had abnormal eGFR. In the present study population, literate individuals, those with co-morbidities, and those in private jobs were found to have significantly higher AOR for abnormal eGFR (Table/Fig 2). There was no available information for one patient regarding caste, education, and morbidity.

Out of the 530 CKD patients, 228 (58.16%) patients were found to have both abnormal lipid profiles and abnormal eGFR, and 131 (36.09%) had both abnormal liver function and abnormal eGFR. eGFR showed a statistically significant association with lipid profile (p-value=0.001) and liver function (p-value=0.001), raising concerns for CKD patients (Table/Fig 3).

The mean levels of TG, Cholesterol (CHOL), HDL, VLDL, and LDL among patients with CKD were 142.65±124.32, 170.35±50.42, 51.14±15.53, 28.53±24.86, and 147.73±52.85, respectively. The mean levels of Total bilirubin (T), Direct bilirubin, SGOT, and SGPT were 0.39±0.21, 0.19±0.13, 28.63±10.58, and 22.53±9.17, respectively (Table/Fig 4).

When the correlation between eGFR and individual parameters of liver function tests and lipid profile was checked using Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis, taking all the parameters as continuous variables, a significantly positive correlation was observed between eGFR and all parameters (TC, TG, LDL, VLDL, direct bilirubin, total bilirubin, SGOT, and SGPT), while eGFR showed a negative correlation with ALP and HDL (Table/Fig 5)a-j,(Table/Fig 6).

Discussion

The CKD has become a worldwide problem, affecting millions of people and its incidence and prevalence are increasing. Timely detection of risk factors and appropriate treatment can prevent the development or progression of CKD. In the present study, approximately 74% of patients had abnormal eGFR, while the remaining patients had normal eGFR, which could be attributed to their medication practice since their diagnosis. The various functions of the kidney are influenced by the aging process, and the GFR decreases with age, starting around the age of 30 (15). The present study demonstrates a higher AOR for having abnormal eGFR in older age groups, including those aged 45-64 years and above 65 years, with the highest AOR recorded in people above 65 years. This is supported by the fact that GFR decreases to <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 in healthy adults over the age of 60-65 years, although this may vary according to gender and age (16). A study on the Canadian population by Ma I et al., showed that women and elderly individuals were significantly associated with an increased risk of abnormal eGFR, suggesting a higher risk for CKD. Conversely, minority individuals and those with high median household income had a significantly lower risk of CKD (17). Contradictory to these findings, the current study did not find a significant difference between males and females or among different castes regarding the risk of having abnormal eGFR. Additionally, according to the present study’s results, literate individuals and those in private jobs appear to be at a higher risk of having CKD.

The contradictory results between other studies and the present study may be due to different study settings, variations in the health status, and lifestyles of the study participants (17),(18),(19). For example, in the Netherlands, low-level education was found to be associated with higher odds of unfavourable CKD outcomes among all ethnic groups studied (18). Similarly, in a German CKD cohort, low educational attainment was positively associated with diabetic nephropathy and CKD following acute kidney injury (19). In the case of individuals in private jobs, their occupation may not directly influence kidney function, but the associated work pressure and poor lifestyle choices may contribute to abnormal kidney function. According to Seligman HK et al., low occupational level is associated with poor food and lifestyle choices, which directly affects the risk of cardiometabolic diseases and CKD (20).

Another common issue in CKD patients is co-morbidity, but its impact on disease progression and outcomes is less studied. The present study showed a significantly higher chance (AOR=5.06) of having abnormal eGFR in people with co-morbidity compared to those without any co-morbid condition. Since co-morbidity is known to be associated with poor renal outcomes in CKD patients, there is an urgent need for tailored treatment strategies for CKD in high-risk groups (21). Similarly, the association of various biochemical indicators with abnormal eGFR or CKD has also been rarely studied, resulting in ambiguous results.

The present study demonstrates that both lipid profile and liver function are associated with eGFR, highlighting the importance of regularly evaluating these parameters in both healthy individuals and those with kidney disease to prevent aggressive renal conditions. According to Liang X et al., high levels of TG, total TC, and LDL are associated with the occurrence of CKD and indicative of the progression of renal dysfunction and disease (22). Since hepatic co-morbidities such as hepatitis B and C are common among CKD patients, testing serum liver enzymes is valuable for diagnosing and monitoring liver damage in this group of patients (23). Furthermore, studies have established a relationship between TC and declined GFR, as well as TC, LDL, and end-stage renal disease in patients with type 1 diabetes and overt nephropathy (24),(25). These findings support the results of the present study and suggest a strong association between lipid profile, liver function enzymes, eGFR, and kidney dysfunction.

Limitation(s)

The present study was conducted in the catchment area of the MRHRU, which includes three specific blocks in a particular geographical area. Therefore, the findings of similar studies conducted in other regions may vary. Additionally, the authors did not compare serum indicators with non CKD cases, which could provide further insights. The small sample size and, in a few cases, the inability to process samples for liver function tests due to insufficient sample volume were major limitations of the present study.

Conclusion

The positive association between lipid profile and liver function enzymes with eGFR highlights the importance of regularly examining serum biochemical indicators to detect renal dysfunction at an early stage and ensure proper disease management. Since lipids and liver function enzymes are also associated with other morbidities such as obesity and diabetes, patients with these risk factors should be treated with utmost precaution to prevent further deterioration of their health status.

Acknowledgement

The authors express their gratitude to the MRHRU for providing the study set-up and laboratory facility. They are also thankful to the Department of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Odisha, as well as the administrative officials, Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs), Accredited social health activists (ASHAs), Anganwadi Workers (AWWs), and Panchayati Raj Institution (PRI) members of the study area for their support.

References

1.
Lv JC, Zhang LX. Prevalence and disease burden of chronic kidney disease. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1165:03-15. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Levey AS, Eckardt KU, Tsukamoto Y. Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: A position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes. (KDIGO) Kidney Int. 2005;67:2089-100. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Bargnoux A, Kuster N, Cavalier E, Piéroni L, Souweine J, Delanaye P, et al. Serum creatinine: Advantages and pitfalls. J Lab Precis Med. 2018;3:7. [crossref]
4.
Colombo M, McGurnaghan SJ, Blackbourn LAK, Dalton RN, Dunger D, Bell S, et al. Comparison of serum and urinary biomarker panels with albumin/creatinine ratio in the prediction of renal function decline in type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2020;63(4):788-98. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO 2012. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 2013;3:01-150.
6.
Giannini EG, Testa R, Savarino V. Liver enzyme alteration: A guide for clinicians. Can Med Assoc J. 2005;172:367-79. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Liberato IR, Lopes EP, Cavalcante MA, Pinto TC, Moura IF, Loureiro Júnior L. Liver enzymes in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012;67:131-34. [crossref]
8.
Kovesdy CP, Ureche V, Lu JL, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Outcome predictability of serum alkaline phosphatase in men with pre-dialysis CKD. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25:3003-11. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Asghari G, Momenan M, Yuzbashian E, Mirmiran P, Azizi F. Dietary pattern and incidence of chronic kidney disease among adults: A population-based study. Nutr Metab. 2018;15:01-11. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Asghari G, Farhadnejad H, Mirmiran P, Dizavi A, Yuzbashian E, Azizi F. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet is associated with reduced risk of incident chronic kidney diseases among Tehranian adults. Hypertens Res. 2017;40:96-102. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Murmu M, Sahu P, Naik M, Nayak OP, Patra SR. Study of lipid profile in non-diabetic CKD patients. J Med Sci Clin Res. 2020;8(3):567-79. [crossref]
12.
Jafar TH, Ramakrishnan C, John O, Tewari A, Cobb B, Legido-Quigley H, et al. Access to CKD Care in Rural Communities of India: A qualitative study exploring the barriers and potential facilitators. BMC Nephrol. 2020;21(1):26. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Tietz Textbook of clinical chemistry and Molecular diagnostics. Burtis, CA, Ashwood ER, Bruns DE; 5th edition, WB Saunders Company, 2012.
14.
Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National cholesterol Education program (NCEP) Expert panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult treatment panel III), JAMA. 285:2486(2001). [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Epstein M. Aging and the kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol.1996;7:1106-22. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Poggio ED, Rule AD, Tanchanco R, Arrigain S, Butler RS, Srinivas T, et al. Demographic and clinical characteristics associated with glomerular filtration rates in living kidney donors. Kidney Int. 2009;75:1079-87. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Ma I, Guo M, Muruve D, Benediktsson H, Naugler C. Sociodemographic associations with abnormal estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in a large Canadian city: A cross-sectional observation study. BMC Nephrol. 2018;19:01-08. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Adjei DN, Stronks K, Adu D, Snijder MB, Modesti PA, Peters RJG, et al. Relationship between educational and occupational levels, and chronic kidney disease in a multi-ethnic sample- The HELIUS study. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0186460.[crossref][PubMed]
19.
Winitzki D, Zacharias HU, Nadal J, Baid-Agrawal S, Schaeffner E, Schmid M, et al. Educational attainment is associated with kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in the German CKD (GCKD) cohort. Kidney Int Rep. 2022;7(5):1004-15. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Seligman HK, Laraia BA, Kushel MB. Food insecurity is associated with chronic disease among lowincome NHANES participants. J Nutri. 2010;140(2):304-10. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Lee W, Lee Y, Li L, Ng H, Kuo W, Lin P, et al. The number of comorbidities predicts renal outcomes in patients with stage 3-5 chronic kidney disease. J Clin Med. 2018;7:493. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Liang X, Ye M, Tao M, Zheng D, Cai R, Zhu Y, et al. The association between dyslipidemia and the incidence of chronic kidney disease in the general Zhejiang population: A retrospective study. BMC Nephrol. 2020;21:01-09. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Johnson DW, Dent H, Yao Q, Tranaeus A, Huang CC, Han DS, et al. Frequencies of hepatitis B and C infections among haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients in Asia Pacific countries: Analysis of registry data. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24:1598 603. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Hovind P, Rossing P, Tarnow L, Smidt UM, Parving HH. Remission and regression in the nephropathy of type 1 diabetes when blood pressure is controlled aggressively. Kidney Int. 2001;60:277-83. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Appel GB, Radhakrishnan J, Avram MM, DeFronzo RA, Escobar-Jimenez F, Campos MM, et al. RENAAL study: Analysis of metabolic parameters as predictors of risk in the RENAAL study. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:1402-07.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/57859.18829

Date of Submission: May 24, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Aug 17, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Nov 21, 2022
Date of Publishing: Dec 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 27, 2023
• Manual Googling: Sep 15, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Nov 18, 2023 (3%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com