Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 28907

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2023 | Month : November | Volume : 17 | Issue : 11 | Page : ZD15 - ZD18 Full Version

Malignant Neoplasm of the Tongue Mimicking an Oral Pyogenic Granuloma: A Case Report


Published: November 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/65039.18732
Ajit Chandrasekhar, Saurabh Kumar, Rabin Chacko, Arun Paul Charlu

1. Post Doctoral Fellow, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Services, Dental and Oral Surgery I, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Services, Dental and Oral Surgery I, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Services, Dental and Oral Surgery I, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Services, Dental and Oral Surgery I, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Arun Paul Charlu,
Room No. 4, Department of Dental and Oral Surgery I, OPD Building, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore-632004, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: drarunpaul81@gmail.com

Abstract

Pyogenic Granuloma (PG) is a benign reactive lesion characterised by tissue hyperplasia caused by local irritants. The gingiva is the most common site of occurrence in the oral cavity, followed by the tongue and buccal mucosa. It typically presents as a pedunculated or sessile mass. Removal of the irritants and complete excision of the lesion from its base usually results in complete resolution. In this case report, the authors present the case of a 44-year-old female patient, who presented to maxillofacial surgeons With complaints of difficulty in eating and speaking due to a large growth on her tongue that had been present for the past year. The mass, which was non-tender and non-indurated, nearly filled the oral cavity. Routine medical examination revealed iron deficiency anaemia, and systemic correction was initiated. Concurrently, the patient underwent surgical excision of the mass, which was initially diagnosed as a PG, under local anaesthesia. However, the final biopsy revealed poorly differentiated Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC). Subsequent radiological investigations revealed extensive local and regional disease spread with metastasis to the upper chest wall. As a result, the patient was advised palliative care by the Institution’s head and neck tumour oncology board.

Keywords

Biopsy, Gingiva, Pedunculated, Squamous cell carcinoma

Case Report

A 44-year-old female patient, residing in Vellore reported to the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department at Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, with a chief complaint of inability to eat or speak properly for the past year. The patient had a history of continuous irritation of the tongue for the last two years, and a growth that started as a small mass one year ago. The mass was not associated with any pain or tenderness and had gradually grown to fill the oral cavity, causing difficulty in eating, loss of appetite, and weight loss. The patient was brought to the hospital by a social worker because she required treatment, but her socio-economic situation was below the poverty level, and thus she had not sought medical treatment over the past two years. There was no familial history of malignancy. The patient’s medical history was non-contributory, and she did not have any tobacco-related habits.

On examination, the patient appeared very fragile and malnourished. No swelling was noted over the face, and a non-tender submandibular node was palpable on the left-side, which was mobile and not fixed to underlying structures. Intraoral examination revealed a 7×5 cm polypoid mass attached only by a pedicle on the left lateral aspect of the tongue, extending towards the pharynx. The growth was mostly soft but firm in some regions and non-tender on palpation (Table/Fig 1). Nasopharyngolaryngoscopy (NPL) performed by an ENT surgeon revealed that the posterior one-third of the tongue was normal and that the lesion was only attached to the left lateral border of the tongue (Table/Fig 2). Routine blood investigations revealed significant abnormalities in iron levels, Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC), Haemoglobin (Hb), and ferritin, while sodium and HbA1c values were mildly altered (Table/Fig 3).

The mass was initially diagnosed as a giant PG on the left lateral border of the tongue due to its pedunculated nature. Additionally, the patient was diagnosed with microcytic hypochromic iron deficiency anaemia and pre-diabetes systemically. Prior to the procedure, the patient received a transfusion of one unit of packed red cells over four hours to achieve a target Hb level of 8 g/dL, as advised by the general medicine team. Following this, an excisional biopsy, as recommended for a PG (1), was performed under local anaesthesia. Local infiltration with 2% lignocaine with adrenaline was used at the peduncular stalk, and a left-side lingual nerve block was administered. The peduncle was incised, and dissection was carried out until the base of the peduncle, completely releasing it. Primary closure was performed using 3-0 vicryl. The entire proliferative mass and its attachment were excised and sent for histopathological confirmation of the diagnosis (Table/Fig 4). The patient experienced no complications during the procedure and was advised to follow-up with the general medicine unit for iron supplementation and further systemic evaluation.

Histopathological evaluation revealed fibrocollagenous tissue covered by stratified squamous epithelium with extensive ulceration and mild dysplasia infiltrated by an ill-defined tumour arranged as sheets, nests, anastomosing cords, trabeculae, and occasional alveolar patterns. The tumour consisted of polygonal cells with fine chromatin, inconspicuous nucleoli, and abundant granular eosinophilic cytoplasm. Foreign body suture material with adjacent giant cell reaction was present. The adjacent stroma showed fibrosis mixed with small-caliber vascular channels. Adjacent spindle cell lesions forming vague fascicles with blunt ends, fine chromatin in the nucleus, inconspicuous nucleoli, and scant cytoplasm were also observed. Some rhabdoid cells, bizarre-looking cells, and tumour giant cells were present (Table/Fig 5)a,b.

Tumour Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed for confirmation and further categorisation of the malignancy. The tumour cells were positive for PanCK and p40, and negative for CD31, desmin, s100, and p16 (Table/Fig 6)a,b.

The final diagnosis was a poorly differentiated SCC of the tongue with spindle cell and epithelioid cell morphology. Following the diagnosis, the patient was referred to the departments of medical oncology, radiation therapy, and head and neck surgery for further evaluation and to plan a second line of management. The head and neck surgical oncology team advised a Computed Tomography (CT) scan of the head and neck with contrast, which revealed a confluent, heterogeneously enhancing lesion along the left lateral border of the anterior third of the tongue, extending up to the midline without crossing it. The maximum depth of invasion was approximately 13 mm, and the lesion was in close proximity to the left lingual neurovascular bundle without encasing it. Multiple enhancing heterogeneous areas were observed within the extrinsic muscles of the tongue and floor of the mouth, including the left anterior belly of the digastric, mylohyoid muscle, geniohyoid, and hyoglossus muscles (Table/Fig 7)a,b. The posterior third/base of the tongue was not involved. Enlarged bilateral cervical lymph nodes and left intraparotid lymph nodes were present, some of which showed features suggestive of extranodal extension. Multiple enhancing necrotic masses were also noted within the left masseter muscle. Along the anterior triangle of the neck and upper chest wall, multiple enhancing subcutaneous nodules measuring up to 5 mm were present (Table/Fig 8)a,b.

Due to the extensive nature of the disease, the head and neck tumour oncology board planned for palliative care for the patient. Treatment options discussed included immunotherapy, carboplatin+paclitaxel chemotherapy, followed by Oral Metronomic Chemotherapy (OMCT) and supportive care. However, due to financial constraints, the patient opted for OMCT. Unfortunately, the patient did not return for further management, and during a telephonic follow-up, it was noted that the patient had passed away three months after her last visit to the hospital.

Discussion

India contributes to one-third of the total burden of oral cancer, which is also the 11th most common form of cancer worldwide. Tobacco usage, human papillomavirus, alcohol, poor nutrition, an immunocompromised state, and chronic irritation are commonly attributed etiological factors for SCC of the oral cavity (2). Chronic irritation is often considered a modifier rather than an initiator of oral cancer (3). Tongue cancers are the most common forms, accounting for 40% of all forms of oral cancer (4), with the majority of lesions presenting as ulcerative growths (5). The tongue, being highly vascularised and muscular with a rich lymphatic network, predisposes it to be a site of malignant invasion (6).

Pyogenic Granulomas (PGs) are benign, reactive, hyperplastic growths in the oral cavity that preferentially affect the gingiva, buccal mucosa, tongue, hard palate, and lip (7). Although the exact cause of PGs is unknown, they are thought to be related to chronic irritation or trauma (8). PGs are more common in the second to fifth decades of life, with a higher percentage of cases occurring in females, suggesting that female sex hormones may play a role in their formation (8),(9). PGs typically present as exophytic, lobulated, or smooth masses with a mostly pedunculated base, although the lobular capillary hemangioma variant may have a sessile base (8),(10). On the other hand, oral SCC is rarely pedunculated but is frequently ulcerative and indurated (4).

The index patient, nearing the fifth decade of life, presented with a slow-growing, non-indurated, pedunculated, and painless exophytic lesion on the tongue with a history of chronic mechanical trauma. This demographic profile and clinical presentation favoured a clinical diagnosis of PG. Even though chronic irritation was considered a confounding factor for SCC rather than an independent risk factor (3).

A polypoid, pedunculated, or exophytic growth pattern is indicative of Spindle Cell carcinoma (SpCC), which is an exceptionally sparse variant of SCC with unique clinicopathologic traits (11). It predominantly occurs in the larynx and is almost always an aggressive and poorly differentiated form of SCC (12). Predisposing factors for SpCC include alcohol consumption, smoking, and previous irradiation history (13). This type of neoplasm, with two different cellular elements, is referred to as a biphasic neoplasm. However, in this case, none of the features of a biphasic neoplasm were present.

The diagnosis of a PG is mostly clinical, and radiographs are not essential unless they are located close to the teeth and signs of bone loss are present. The final diagnosis is based on the histopathological report (14). In the index patient, the lesion was on the tongue with no features of bony involvement, but signs of malignancy were evident. Therefore, it was provisionally diagnosed as a PG, and an excisional biopsy was performed as complete excision is the treatment of choice [14-16]. Complete excision is associated with the least recurrence rates and a definitive cure (17). Unfortunately, it was reported as SCC with epithelial and spindle cell components.

The IHC markers are highly essential tools in diagnosing a biphasic neoplasm as they express both epithelial and mesenchymal markers (18). In the present case, the tumour cells were predominantly SCC with adjacent spindle cell bundles, and only the epithelial markers were expressed, but not the mesenchymal markers. Spindle cells can be focally positive for PanCK (19), which was expressed in the present case.

If a spindle cell component is present, the neoplasm is considered more aggressive than usual, and close follow-up after surgery and radiotherapy is recommended due to the exceptionally high rate of recurrence (20). As these lesions tend to metastasize and recur easily, prognosis is based on the depth of invasion, although it remains controversial (21).

Conclusion

Over three lakh people are estimated to be diagnosed with oral SCC annually, with India accounting for over 20% of the diagnosed population. SCC can even present as a pedunculated lesion similar to a PG. Therefore, when patients present with large lesions (>2 cm), regardless of the nature of the lesion, it is advisable to perform a CT scan of the head and neck as part of the first line of investigations and to opt for an incisional biopsy rather than an excisional biopsy.

References

1.
Jafarzadeh H, Sanatkhani M, Mohtasham N. Oral pyogenic granuloma: A review. J Oral Sci. 2006;48(4):167-75. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Borse V, Konwar AN, Buragohain P. Oral cancer diagnosis and perspectives in India. Sens Int. 2020;1:100046. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Gupta AA, Kheur S, Varadarajan S, Parveen S, Dewan H, Alhazmi YA, et al. Chronic mechanical irritation and oral squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2021;21(6):647-58. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Yamamoto H, Kawai M, Kichiro M. Pedunculated squamous cell carcinoma on the tip of the tongue. Oral Health Case Rep. 2017;3(3):139. [crossref]
5.
Regezi J, Sciubba J, Jordan R. Ulcerative Lesions. In: Oral Pathology: Clinical Pathologic Correlations. Seventh. St. Louis, Missouri 63043: ELSEIVER.
6.
Kim SH, Cho NH, Kim K, Lee JS, Koo BS, Kim JH, et al. Correlations of oral tongue cancer invasion with matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression. J Surg Oncol. 2006;93(4):330-37. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Parajuli R, Maharjan S. Unusual presentation of oral pyogenic granulomas: A review of two cases. Clin Case Rep. 2018;6(4):690-93. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Verma PK, Srivastava R, Baranwal HC, Chaturvedi TP, Gautam A, Singh A. Pyogenic granuloma - Hyperplastic lesion of the gingiva: Case reports. Open Dent J. 2012;6:153-56. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Shah JS, Patel A, Lunagariya N. Clinical nature and treatment with sclerotherapy of pyogenic granuloma: A case series. J Clin Diagn Res. 2020:14(9):ZR01-04. [crossref]
10.
Smith M. Pathology Outlines - Pyogenic granuloma. Available from: https://www. pathologyoutlines.com/topic/oralcavitypyogenicgranuloma.html.
11.
James AR, Sekar R, Ganesan S, Srinivas BH. Spindle cell carcinoma of tongue. BMJ Case Rep. 2021;14(11):e246740. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Stelow EB, Mills SE. Squamous cell carcinoma variants of the upper aerodigestive tract. Am J Clin Pathol. 2005;124 Suppl:S96-109. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Rath R, Das BK, Das S, Baisakh M. Spindle cell carcinoma of maxilla: Histomorphological and immunohistochemical analysis of a case. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol JOMFP. 2014;18(2):256-61. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Georgoulis A, Zarenti S, Anastasopoulos M, Doufexi AE. Pyogenic granuloma: A literature review and a case report. Eur J Dent Oral Health. 2022;3(3):01-04. [crossref]
15.
Sarwal P, Lapumnuaypol K. Pyogenic Granuloma. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
16.
Wollina U, Langner D, França K, Gianfaldoni S, Lotti T, Tchernev G. Pyogenic granuloma – a common benign vascular tumor with variable clinical presentation: New findings and treatment options. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2017;5(4):423-26. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Giblin AV, Clover AJP, Athanassopoulos A, Budny PG. Pyogenic granuloma – the quest for optimum treatment: Audit of treatment of 408 cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(9):1030-35. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Zidar N, Gale N. Larynx Cancer: Pathology and Genetics. In: Boffetta P, Hainaut P, editors. Encyclopedia of Cancer (Third Edition). Oxford: Academic Press; 2019;Pp. 346-55. [crossref]
19.
Surbhi, Metgud R, Naik S, Patel S. Spindle cell lesions: A review on immunohistochemical markers. J Cancer Res Ther. 2017;13(3):412-18.
20.
Sarma A, Das R, Sharma JD, Kataki AC. Spindle cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study of 40 cases. J Cancer Ther. 2012;3(6):1055-59. [crossref]
21.
Rathy R, Vishnu M, Ajish SM. Spindle cell carcinoma of maxilla: Case report of a rare entity and review of literature. Oral & Maxillofacial Pathology Journal. 2013;4:379- 84. https://ompj.org/files/6ab4314a74f643fa9438b6e10fd36303-7.Rathy.pdf.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/65039.18732

Date of Submission: Apr 28, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jul 15, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Sep 15, 2023
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 02, 2023
• Manual Googling: Jul 22, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Sep 12, 2023 (7%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com