Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 182244

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2023 | Month : November | Volume : 17 | Issue : 11 | Page : UR01 - UR04 Full Version

Anaesthetic Management of Caesarean Section in Asymptomatic COVID-19 Positive Parturients with Abnormal Laboratory Findings: A Series of 15 Cases


Published: November 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/66382.18709
M Mohan David, Megha Bharath, Afeefa Abdu Rahman, PM Ajmal

1. Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Government Medical College, Palakkad, Kerala, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Government Medical College, Palakkad, Kerala, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Government Medical College, Palakkad, Kerala, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Government Medical College, Palakkad, Kerala, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. PM Ajmal,
Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Government Medical College, Palakkad-678013, Kerala, India.
E-mail: pmajmal@gmail.com

Abstract

During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, Caesarean Sections (CS) were prioritised over other elective surgeries, leading to the identification and management of asymptomatic COVID-19 positive parturients. The present case series aimed to explore the possibility of laboratory abnormalities and adverse events that can occur in asymptomatic COVID-19 positive cases in the post-pandemic era when routine screening is no longer in place. Out of 141 asymptomatic COVID-19 positive CS patients, 15 cases were selected based on specific criteria. Demographic characteristics and clinical indicators were analysed, including age, gravidity, indications for CS, laboratory values {such as D-dimer, C Reactive Protein (CRP), and platelet count}, blood transfusion requirements, and obstetric outcomes. Indications for CS were predominantly previous CS and failure to progress. Laboratory abnormalities included elevated D-dimer, CRP, leukocyte count, and thrombocytopenia in some cases. Haemodynamic stability was maintained in all patients. The use of prophylactic anticoagulation was noted, potentially offering protection against thrombosis. Asymptomatic COVID-19 positive parturients can exhibit significant laboratory abnormalities. Thromboprophylaxis may play a role in mitigating thrombotic risks. The significance of the present case series lies in the fact that the laboratory abnormalities could only be detected since all positive patients were investigated as per hospital protocol, which will be missed in the post-COVID-19 era where routine investigations are not performed on asymptomatic patients. Therefore, healthcare workers should be aware of this possibility.

Keywords

Anaesthesia, C-reactive protein, D-dimer

Caesarean sections had to be performed without exception due to their inherent nature during the COVID-19 pandemic, even though many other elective cases were postponed. Routine screening, as per hospital protocol, allowed for the detection of many asymptomatic parturients who were managed according to guidelines. The primary anaesthetic technique employed was subarachnoid blockade, unless contraindicated. Despite being asymptomatic, significant laboratory abnormalities and untoward incidents could occur in such cases. These findings hold relevance in the post-COVID-19 era when routine screening and laboratory investigations are not conducted for asymptomatic patients. Guzey NA et al., have discovered that closely monitoring laboratory values will provide information about the clinical course in COVID-19 positive parturients (1). Therefore, healthcare workers must maintain a high degree of suspicion and vigilance regarding the possibility of abnormal laboratory findings.

Case Report

In this case series, patients were classified as symptomatic or asymptomatic based on the presence or absence of any of the following symptoms: fever, cough, rhinitis, breathlessness, headache, and palpitation (2). Out of a total of 157 COVID-19 positive caesarean sections performed at the institution between March 2020 and February 2022, only 16 patients were symptomatic. Among the remaining 141 asymptomatic patients, the authors selected 15 cases who met one or more of the following criteria. Routine investigations were conducted for all positive patients according to hospital protocol. The modified cut-off values were based on previous studies.

1. D-dimer >1500 ng/mL (3)
2. C-Reactive Protein (CRP) ≥3 mg/dL (4)
3. Platelet count <100,000/mm3 (5)
4. Requirement of blood transfusion (6)
5. Intrauterine death of the baby (7)

Subarachnoid blockade was administered to 14 patients, while general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation was performed in one patient due to thrombocytopaenia. Preoperatively, all patients were kept in an isolation ward, and the cases were conducted in a dedicated operation theatre for COVID-19 cases using Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) kits. The majority of patients were between the ages of 20 and 30 years and were second gravidas. The most common indication for caesarean section was a previous caesarean section, followed by failure to progress (Table/Fig 1). Four patients had haemoglobin levels below 11 gm%. Other blood results are provided in (Table/Fig 2). Significant laboratory abnormalities are highlighted in (Table/Fig 3). All patients maintained haemodynamic stability with a Mean Blood Pressure (MBP) of atleast 70 mmHg or higher. Hypotension was prevented by administering intravenous fluid preloading with 5 mL/kg and co-loading with 10 mL/kg, along with a bolus dose of 5mg of intravenous Ephedrine. Except for one patient, all patients received prophylactic Enoxaparin/Heparin, which was discontinued preoperatively according to recommended guidelines. The patient with thrombocytopaenia received general anaesthesia for the caesarean section, while the others underwent subarachnoid blockade. This patient tested negative for dengue IgM. Postoperatively, this patient required transfusion of four units of Platelet Concentrate (PC), two units of Packed Red Blood Cells (PRBC), and two units of Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP). One patient with a history of previous caesarean section experienced complications including abruptio placentae, uterine rupture, and intrauterine death of the baby. This patient also received two units of PRBC transfusion. The average duration of hospital stay was 8.2 days, with only three patients requiring more than 10 days (Table/Fig 4). There were no other major adverse incidents, and all patients were discharged safely.

Discussion

Asymptomatic COVID-19 positive parturients were only detected due to routine Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)/Rapid Antigen Test (RAT) screening. The major indication for Caesarean Section (CS) in the present case series was a history of previous CS and failure to progress, which is consistent with the findings of Guzey N et al., who evaluated 254 CS patients with COVID-19 (1). Complications such as placental abruption, preterm labour, stillbirth, and anaemia were observed, in line with previous studies (5),(7),(8),(9). The occurrence of two cases of placental abruption and one case of intrauterine death in the present case series could potentially be attributed to COVID-19. Aghaamoo S et al., found a higher risk of abruption, preterm labour, and stillbirth in patients with COVID-19 (7). The occurrence of anaemia in COVID-19 is significant as it can impair oxygen-carrying capacity and potentially exacerbate hypoxia due to lung damage. Bergamaschi G et al., and Dakshnamurthy P et al., have reported the occurrence of anaemia in COVID-19 positive parturients [8,9]. One patient presented with a haemoglobin level of 7.5g%, which was corrected with packed red cells and oxygen was administered via mask to improve oxygen flux. Leukocytosis greater than 10,000/cmm was reported by Chen R et al., (10). Eight patients had a total leukocyte count higher than 10,000, and only one patient had a count lower than 5,000/cmm. Jamal S et al., found that thrombocytopenia can occur even in asymptomatic COVID-19 positive parturients (5). One patient had a platelet count of 70,000/cmm, negative dengue tests, and no other identifiable cause. Denizli R et al., noted in their study that elevated liver enzymes could occur in COVID-19 positive pregnant patients, but no such findings were seen in this case series (11). Zhang Y et al., reported the importance of highlighting the increased risk of hypotension related to neuraxial anaesthesia in COVID-19 positive parturients undergoing caesarean deliveries (12). However, in this study, all patients remained haemodynamically stable. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) have differing guidelines for administering prophylactic Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH)/Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) in COVID-19 positive antepartum patients (13),(14). In this case series, except for one patient, all patients were administered prophylactic LMWH/UFH as per institutional guidelines. This may have had a protective effect against thrombosis, even in asymptomatic cases, which could indirectly reflect as reduced D-dimer values. García IG et al., demonstrated that throughout pregnancy, D-dimer levels progressively and significantly increased, reaching higher levels in the third trimester, with a reference value of 551-3333 ng/mL (15). Since the above reference values are for normal pregnancies and thromboprophylaxis was used, a D-dimer value higher than 1500 ng/mL was taken as an inclusion criterion in this case series. Watts DH et al., found that the median CRP value for women in labour at term was 1.3 mg/dL (16). The CRP values higher than six in six patients in this series could be attributed to COVID-19. According to Kinsey KE et al., COVID-19 can cause intraoperative coagulopathy and significantly more oozing (17). This may have contributed to the increased requirement of blood products in two patients, even though there were other obvious indications for blood transfusion.

In summary, all mothers in the present case series study had a safe and healthy postoperative period, with only two patients requiring admission to the intensive care unit for blood transfusion and monitoring. There was one case of intrauterine death, but all other newborns were healthy and without any symptoms. Anesthesiologists can play a crucial role in ensuring the safety of newborns by assessing the APGAR score and providing resuscitation if necessary (18). Anticoagulation therapy for postpartum patients may contribute to a good prognosis (19).

Conclusion

COVID-19 positive parturients, even if asymptomatic, can exhibit laboratory abnormalities such as thrombocytopaenia, high D-dimer, and CRP levels. In some cases, the D-dimer levels were higher than expected during pregnancy, even after administering thromboprophylaxis. Further studies are needed on a country or region-specific basis to determine whether routine thromboprophylaxis is necessary, as different strains of COVID-19 vary in their tendency to cause thrombosis. Timely recognition of these laboratory abnormalities can help prevent potential complications such as bleeding, thrombosis, or sepsis. Although anaesthesia and perioperative management could be performed safely in this case series, it would be advisable for healthcare providers to exercise caution in the post-COVID-19 era when routine screening for COVID-19 is not conducted, as many asymptomatic cases can easily be missed.

References

1.
Güzey NA, Türkyilmaz UE. Evaluation of 254 cesarean sections with COVID-19 in terms of anaesthesia and clinical course: 1-year experience. J Anaesth. 2022;36(4):514-23. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Vaezi M, Mirghafourvand M, Hemmatzadeh S. Characteristics, clinical and laboratory data and outcomes of pregnant women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to Al-Zahra tertiary referral maternity center in Iran: A case series of 24 patients. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:378. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03764-y. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Vlachodimitropoulou KE, Vivanti-AJ, Shehata N, Benachi A, Le Gouez A, Desconclois C, et al. COVID-19 and acute coagulopathy in pregnancy. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18(7):1648-52. Doi: 10.1111/jth.14856. Epub 2020 May 26. PMID: 32302459; PMCID: PMC9770955. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Stringer D, Braude P, Myint PK, Evans L, Collins JT, Verduri A, et al. The role of C-reactive protein as a prognostic marker in COVID-19. Int J Epidemiol [Internet]. 2021 Apr 1 [cited 2023 Sep 23];50(2):420-29. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyab012. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Jamal S, Singh N. COVID-19 in pregnancy: An experience at a dedicated tertiary care COVID facility in western Uttar Pradesh. J South Asian Fed Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;13(2):81-83. [crossref]
6.
Kinsey KE, Ganz E, Khalil S, Brustman L. Intraoperative coagulopathy during cesarean section as an unsuspected initial presentation of COVID-19: A case report. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):481. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Aghaamoo S, Ghods K, Rahmanian M. Pregnant women with COVID-19: The placental involvement and consequences. J Mol Histol. 2021;52(3):427-35. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Bergamaschi G, Borrelli de Andreis F, Aronico N, Lenti MV, Barteselli C, Merli S, et al. Anaemia in patients with COVID-19: Pathogenesis and clinical significance. Clin Exp Med. 2021;21(2):239-46. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Dakshnamurthy P, Samidurai E, Sharma N, Karthik P, Rajendran K. An observational study of COVID-19 infection in pregnant women at a tertiary care center. Int J Infertil Fetal Med. 2023;14(1):38-41. [crossref]
10.
Chen R, Zhang Y, Huang L, Cheng BH, Xia ZY, Meng QT. Safety and efficacy of different anaesthetic regimens for parturients with COVID-19 undergoing Cesarean delivery: A case series of 17 patients. Can J Anaesth. 2020;67(6):655-63. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Denizli R, Sakcak B, Farisog?ullari N, Peker MEM, Sinaci S, Kara Ö, et al. The impact of elevated liver enzymes and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy on the course of COVID-19 in pregnant women. SN Compr Clin Med. 2022;4(1):184.[crossref][PubMed]
12.
Zhang Y, Chen R, Cao C, Gong Y, Zhou Q, Wei M, et al. The risk of neuraxial anaesthesia-related hypotension in COVID-19 parturients undergoing cesarean delivery: A multicenter, retrospective, propensity score matched cohort study. Front Med [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Aug 26];8. Available from: https://www. frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2021.713733. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Varlas VN, Bors ´ RG, Plotogea M, Iordache M, Mehedint´ u C, Cîrstoiu MM. Thromboprophylaxis in pregnant women with COVID-19: An unsolved issue. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(3):1949. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 196: Thromboembolism in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(1):e1-17. [crossref]
15.
García IG, Cañadas PP, Uriarte JM, Izquierdo OG, Pérez MAJ, de Guadiana Romualdo LG. D-dimer during pregnancy: Establishing trimester-specific reference intervals. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2018;78(6):439-42. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Watts DH, Krohn MA, Wener MH, Eschenbach DA. C-reactive protein in normal pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77(2):176-80. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Kinsey KE, Ganz E, Khalil S, Brustman L. Intraoperative coagulopathy during cesarean section as an unsuspected initial presentation of COVID-19: A case report. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):481. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Juan J, Gil MM, Rong Z, Zhang Y, Yang H, Poon LC. Effect of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on maternal, perinatal and neonatal outcome: Systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;56(1):15-27. Doi: 10.1002/uog.22088. PMID: 32430957; PMCID: PMC7276742. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Wang Y, Liang X, Wang H, Li L, Xiong G, Mi L. A considerable asymptomatic proportion and thromboembolism risk of pregnant women with COVID-19 infection in Wuhan, China. J Perinat Med. 2021;49(2):237-40. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm- 2020-0409.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/66382.18709

Date of Submission: Jul 05, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Aug 24, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Oct 11, 2023
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 06, 2023
• Manual Googling: Sep 14, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Oct 09, 2023 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com